i
NOTES ON M4/VØE1'R4B/UrY
ANALYSIS )./(4/ornofo.
/9é/,
ÛÌt-OSAKA UNIVERSITY
ERIMmr MA
1. Th INPPOVD SIMI1LPÁ1OUS TAPION MTHO1 OP ANALYZINQ ZTGZAÇ NotJ ( TABL.g II ) Applying the are derived, £ equation at t = te ,
4 & t
-xJ,t
(2)
the following equations
Solving (k and (5) simultaneously, K in
later half and
are
obtained. Then using this K in earlier half is obtained from
(3),.
These procedures are the sane with the forger one described in
Ref-erence I, eccept the correction for a possible initia], heading rate 8o This correction is made merely by a alight modficatioz in reading up te, et
6,
¿9 & (9 , as is shown iii the figureabove. he principle is clear from the equatión (2). Integrating the equation from t = O to t, we obtain
/(1dt
i-
íJ,te
Next, integrating the equation of motion (1) from t t to te, t 4' to t arid t to t , we get
¡a-2
(
e -
- X
Jite-q
( 6 )
(8
-
4')
-
/J
Ji4(z'-4(/
(7)
.7 e(8
2
1,
ti'
/ 2 t2',
4'
ad
are selected a littleearlier from, or
just the sane as t.2 t and t1
respectively. Thia
selectj
depende upon consideration of easiness and reliability
in.
reading u the heading rate
8
at these instants. In this calculation, Iin earlier half is to be used for Eq.
(6)
and K in later half for Eq.(7)
and (8).
This new procedure of obtainin T is generally
more reliable than the former
it is hard to be affected by a possible local distU.rbce in a heading angle record becauseof
its short integration period and also by a possible error in Ö,
valúe, Since 4.term
in the procedure does not became
80
large.2. Tg LEAST QUAR METHOD ( TABLE
III )
The equation of motion. of integrated form
(2) is employeä again
i the procedure.
lodifying the equation, we get
T().*f
Applying
the
equation to successiveinstants of a certain interval over whole manoeuvre, we obtain numerous
simultanéons equatjo, the
unknowns of which are , K and .
,
These
three may be determined 1rough the usual tachnics of the least square method.
The
heading rate at an arbitrary instant is obtainedby
the procedure of finite difference, if necessary, with
some fairing.
t-Jat those instants when
Q the rudder is at rest iscalculated successively
following the
formulae
below.
Jv4 ea. Ç
,s
e-/Iz, kept
1-t .3
'2
1 e,Pt,=
¿t
-;_
d&//ds
L/R and where s =iCa-
ordc
VSo the similar analysis applied to the transformed record yields
no.ndìmensional indices K' and T' immediately. The procedure is more reasonable than the usual tinie base analysis, since it takes account of instantaneous speed variation during a manoeuvre.
In case of a model test, the procedure is crried out conveniently using a vane-wheel current meter with a resolution pick-up that
produces a pulse signal by each revolution. The- relation between
the revolutional rate of a current meter, rps' and shIp speed is linear as is shown below. If the straight line- obtained from trial
runs passes the oriîn, each one revolution of the vane corresponds -exactly tea certain ship travel, that is, V/rpst in metre.. An
actual rps'- V line passes not exactly through the origin but near the origin. For a well-manufactured currentmeter, however, its
rps'- V line may be simulated by an ideal rps'-.V' line through the
origin with a gradient of rpsmean)/ V(mean) in a fair aécuracy. rps'(meah) is a mean rpst over a-whole manoeuvre and. V(mean) 2.8 a speed correspond-ing rps'(mean)
3
J
2I_1
Ìt2t1) 2 3 (7
rT)
when ¿ is-being kept,
¡I
-
¡Z
(tf4»
(rt)
-
2
Zwhen is being kept.
3 4NALYSIs IN RESPECT TO SHIP TRAVEL COMP'TSA'ION FOR SPEEP ARIATION
When ship speed is measured during a manoeuvre, we can transform
8
¡
record against time into against ship travel by integrating speed record;of course nondimensional ship travel s is more reasonable than travel
itself. The equation of motion against ship travel has the similar
form with Eq. (1), that is
'dra
'r
-ds
-t Ç2K (d,,
/
k'1-
1?j,
y I7--According to this principle, all analyses are c-arried out against current meter revolution pulse signal instead of time signal as is commonly used. The obtained X and T are nondimensionalize as follows,
k. INDICES K' AND T' 'AS FUNCTIONS OF TURNING CURVATURE LEVEL refer to the attached figures )
In most cases it is possible to simulate well an observed ship motion in the zig-zag manoeuvre utilizing the linear equation with
K and .i derived by the linear analysis (eference I). Those
indices 1erived from the manoeuvres with different angles of helm employed, however, show sometimes a considerable difference to each
other. This suggests that ship motion in the manoeuvre is no essentially linear1 but ' linear on the average " if linear indices are adjusted
adequately. The indices in this definition may of coue depend
upon a level of ,turning curvature. -From this point of view, it is
recóiidble to carry out the manoeuvre not only by a gle helm angle bt by several one-s and then to formulate the indies'obtained as a function of average turning curvature.
The turning curvature level may be defined by the root mean square
value of -Q over a whole manoeuvre. For the
least square analysis ou zig-zag.manoeuvre, this value has been.2 provided during the procedure, i.e. Z?2 is.a summation of (9 ( or
.Q2 in. the travel base analysis). The simultaneous eqs. method
does not give te value op the oher hand. Accordînz to experiences.,
mean value of /t94/ and
/8/
multiplied by 0.7, is nearly the rootmean square of .
This ilay be used as a measure of turning
curvature leve], for convenience.
The attached figures illustrate two examples of the representation
for a cargo li'ner with 1?iariner stern arrangement.
5.
THE LEAST SUAP ANALYSIS ON TURNÚSG TRIAL( refer to the attached firures ) The'following procedure of the analysis is now in use at our organization, while several procedures have been tried up to the
present. Ref erng to the attached figures,,pip,econd order
expression oflf#1tseems t be more successful. 'Yurther comparative examination for other ship types is now underway.
(1) Steady turning radious for the angles of helm of about±5 ± 10:
± 15, ± 20, I 25, 1 30, ± 35
and if necessary ± 4O are obtained -.through usual turning trials.
()
Steady turning angular velocities and ship speeds for helm angZes of about f 1° and helm midship are also defined by running trials with those angles f helm. Then we get steady turning radious as follows, L,'-=
If the turning paths for smaller angleä of helm may run out of the manoeuvring basin, the procedure of (2) of dàfining Q is employed
also
for the turñing trials.
a-(3)
The neutral helm angle, withwhich
a shipruns
exactly straight, is definedusing
only the results for ± 10 helm angleand helm
midship. in this small range,Q - J
relation may be regarded aa linear.(1f) Using
helm
that is
Picking up X2.
- ä
relations for the helm± 15° , the coefficient
a
i determinedsquare method with a describing equation of the
r
4.12.ò
aQ
±
b2
é
aQ
(5)
Employing this
a
value, the cdefficientb
for stay-board turn is obtained from to normal equations derived fromQ
-
¡
relation ii starboard turn only. Since -these equations producesomewhat different. b value, the mean value of them is taken as the
final
value.The similar procedure is repeated for port
turn
so thatb
vale
for port turn is determined.
the neutral helm angle,
-äp,
aildetected¿n
- angle of
are transformed into effective angle of helm
6,
A
or
I Nomoto; Analysis of the standard manoeuvre of Kempf and proposed steering, quality indices,
Trans. of ship manoeuvrability simposium at Washington, 1960
II Nils H. Norrb.in; Model tests and ship correlation for a cargo liner Tyrans. Royal Insti.tution of Nay. Arch. (advance
COpy;for
Gothenburg meeting, 1961)angles within about
through the 1eat
form,
» P ) ' flPrï ,r.-. "H s H
/f,i,j/
Jy
:'
T ,y 'irlJì
? !''t _//_'»
i pJ/4'1L
( f J2t672S5 ¿I/
ff(]' (Ç'i
'¡/ft If2S)(' ¿AIXiA/î) 'iA 7 (/1 )PT
2iid4
MiVo
/.di
.te
ç/.7
Z/27.2
Z"
7i
5,o
z':4;:/Ûr.o
t6'
t,
EX/? 4/o.
ß,ITE
TABLE ii
22/«
2.9 O'-2'/9
27O
o' /'1
i'-/3O
/2J"
-t2 z/7 Z-t
212 t-4 2.f
2C8 '.2/
&#'-C.7
p.72
- 2-O
i.o
. 23'2Z
ti
/13.1)t'
:&r.3
2C
t
91.Z
r i2/
'?2/.k
/'
()
() 2O,/ (t)
2f./
ii
32
'j/z /2p.i 'ì
2/2/
¿.(
) 12q
q 3,26f
f 3.2/3.2
2 ¿ f
9q
2g
3'
/2'
,,
2
472
r/7
t
r.
-
t)/ -
j.
2
-i'ti
t)/Z -/2/
-ftt71/2
(±)
S'tr
(r)
/
(t)
-/70
031f)
/2
à(r)
Jt
-f32
(4
-;
/C'3q2
(t)
/r,/
-dt
tet
- °
íz
()
-'fO (t)
t)
-1'/ X(t)
(9e'b)_,q,9
fa,dt
/f$:
32
/22
1 . .7
/1.7
/,
f
/0j
2 3.0
/ /
Ir
cVx 27/f
cXL</27
te
2/27Z
4'XI--r2
'K-27y
222/f
',73f
=27.
=/2/2
=23,9/tx/<
AÇ5
,6'9tDj
27.7
2/ f?
r
6.37
-2 -2/( xlçt11
,92f' K.0
3f3
-,û.fl
4
4
7.22 o
i
¡r
-/.22
te
f/,y
61Ja?'Iif
()
r/
0e
26'.7
-=û' .olfr
/
/<
)7Of
XV
T
//.f
-. 13
J('
'f1'
27/ef
f-2q
& )
.,'rì:
(7tZ'
2/1/
1Z'rtr)/
-/20./
(r)
le
o20
A&. "N44Jv
/?15T. 047Es/p.
t
l
37'2
t4 '/3.02òf1 ¿
O-lo
13*f2
r1
/229/
t2/3'j
;2
Cr)
;-jc
(i)
21a./
(t)
f27./
¡ -.2o
c,-1)(172 4-Jrç-,z (-h)(f
jiíz
,,y//q
-2O
(r) /1t)9//f)
f31J'
E,'P. No.
DÄBLEIII
8
o./49
a
b 41L
i,,
-6
fädt. (i)
t
PS'
/-4C
/7
T /1
(½)
p
¡.r
?,d 7 --ç
z,í6'2
7r ¡,J -fr./
'J/
220
/2'?
:,1 7y
dc.?7
/.f -LtZ
.2i:r
-/9.
-9
-/2
il O C4'
1<¡'ij2j.
.íq -rì
'o
'
¡i-'2"
.4
,
7
//Tf
T
lr-i.
..íL-/.4
T!Y
't
¡ir -ir
13
i
-'i
i
/
-i
T
i6'
-12.//7f-/í
.o
-.70
2fr(
¡,,
-r]
/r if
(
.7/
2.2
-
71LJ2L
-.72k-f.
zQi' /y,J;
/
-,7/' Y6
2.eoi6
2
f
2r, 6
f.é
2Zf 2,2
'.z-21.5
23f
20.1 -f
f4 26k
,,24x0
-&
.ill ,n6'
¿IT!
f.7
'I-I W
J2f0
215
I'D
'li"! «a'
y 2/if
a//aiLed
The space here is usually
&fo'
for calculation of solving the simultaneous equations derived fromthe least square method. .Lhe coefficients of the
equations are described below.