• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Platonizm skrajny Juliana Dodda

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Platonizm skrajny Juliana Dodda"

Copied!
1
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Robert Koszkało

Julian Dodd’s Musical Platonism Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to analyze Julian Dodd’s musical Platonism in the ontology of works of music. Dodd defends two views; first, that musical works are norm-types the tokens of which are dateable, locatable patterns of sounds. Second, that musical works are entities individuated purely in terms of how they sound. The main results of the analysis is the rejection of the following Dodd’s theses: 1. that types exist eternally; 2. that they are unstructured; 3.that their identity is determined by the condition that something must meet to be one of its tokens.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

It is known that every rank-one convex function is continuous in its domain and for f ∈ C 2 inequality (2.2) is equivalent to the Legendre–Hadamard condition (or ellipticity

Mr Smith buys one randomly chosen lottery ticket every day (we assume that tickets from the two lotteries are equally numerous on all days); the choices on different days

Some displays will show wonderful blacks in a bright environment, but those same blacks will be seen as dark gray when that display is placed in a dark

Formuła zdaniowa jest wymuszana we wszystkich liniowo uporządkowanych modelach Kripkego wtedy i tylko wtedy, gdy jest prawdziwa we wszystkich liniowo uporządkowanych

The two features of similarity that (1) the Λ-dependence becomes explicit before one tackles the problem of solving the eigenvalue problem for H eff and (2) the effective

The detailed objectives within the presented works are: analysis of road safety in Poland; analysis of road accidents related to children, and the analysis of initiatives and

The olfactory bulb cells project to the five different regions of olfactory cortex: the anterior olfactory nucleus; and the olfactory tubercle; the piriform (olfactory) cortex;

As for the gradient estimate, for the proof of Theorem 1.3 one can either use the blowing-up analysis from [8] or estimates from [6] and [15] (proved independently from each other