• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Knowledge cluster initiatives by MEXT – case of Tokai Region Nanotechnology Manufacturing Cluster in Japan. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu = Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 2013, Nr 295, s.27-40

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Knowledge cluster initiatives by MEXT – case of Tokai Region Nanotechnology Manufacturing Cluster in Japan. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu = Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 2013, Nr 295, s.27-40"

Copied!
18
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

PRACE NAUKOWE

Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu

RESEARCH PAPERS

of Wrocław University of Economics

295

edited by

Anna H. Jankowiak

Szymon Mazurek

Bogusława Skulska

Publishing House of Wrocław University of Economics

Wrocław 2013

Clusters, Networks and Markets

in the Asia-Pacific Region

(2)

Copy-editing: Agnieszka Flasińska Layout: Barbara Łopusiewicz Proof-reading: Barbara Łopusiewicz Typesetting: Beata Mazur

Cover design: Beata Dębska

The project has been cofinanced by the National Science Centre according to the decision No. DEC-2011/01/D/HS4/00639

This publication is available at www.ibuk.pl, www.ebscohost.com, and in The Central and Eastern European Online Library www.ceeol.com as well as in the annotated bibliography of economic issues of BazEkon http://kangur.uek.krakow.pl/bazy_ae/bazekon/nowy/index.php

Information on submitting and reviewing papers is available on the Publishing House’s website

www.wydawnictwo.ue.wroc.pl

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or in any means without the prior written permission of the Publisher © Copyright by Wrocław University of Economics

Wrocław 2013

ISSN 1899-3192 ISBN 978-83-7695-358-8

The original version: printed Printing: Printing House TOTEM

(3)

Contents

Introduction ... 7 Ken-ichi Ando: The dynamics of the industrial cluster facing the foreign

expansion of the home multinationals, the changes of the automotive sector in Aichi and their reasons ... 9

Sebastian Bobowski: Knowledge cluster initiatives by MEXT – case of Tokai

Region Nanotechnology Manufacturing Cluster in Japan ... 27

Anna H. Jankowiak: Micro, small and medium enterprises clusters and the

regional development – case of India ... 41

Szymon Mazurek: Clusters in India as an instrument for enhancing the

innovation, productivity and competitiveness of micro and small enter-prises ... 50

Tomasz Bieliński: Development of internet social networks in China as a

chance for European software developers ... 61

Günter Heiduk, Agnieszka McCaleb: Production, innovation, information

networks in Asia: The role of institutions ... 72

Marta Najda-Janoszka, Karolina Nessel: Has the economic liberalization

changed Filipino business networks? A case study of a small travel agency ... 83

Chris Weston: North Korea and its special economic zones: Re-establishing

networks with the world economy? ... 93

Marta Wincewicz-Bosy: Networks of economic entities related to horse

racing exemplified by the Japan Racing Association (JRA) ... 109

Anna Żyła: The international production networks as a factor of growing

investment attractiveness of ASEAN countries ... 119

Marcin Jałowiecki: China’s luxury products market ... 130 Karolina Klupś-Orłowska: People’s Republic of China as a new direction

for luxury goods brands producers based on the example of activity of Louis Vuitton Moët Hennessy ... 140

Karolina Łopacińska: The Chinese management model regarding enterprise

competitiveness on the international market ... 150

Thanh Nguyen: Vietnamese fishing communities: Which solution between

(4)

6

Contents

Streszczenia

Ken-ichi Ando: Klastry przemysłowe w kraju macierzystym korporacji

trans-narodowych na przykładzie japońskiego sektora motoryzacyjnego... 26

Sebastian Bobowski: Inicjatywa klastra wiedzy MEXT – przykład klastra

nanotechnologicznego regionu Tokai w Japonii ... 40

Anna H. Jankowiak: Klastry mikro, małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw a

rozwój regionalny – przypadek Indii ... 49

Szymon Mazurek: Klastry w Indiach jako instrument wspierania innowa-

cyjności i konkurencyjności małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw ... 60

Tomasz Bieliński: Rozwój internetowych sieci społecznościowych w

Chi-nach jako możliwość rozwoju dla europejskich producentów oprogramo-wania ... 71

Günter Heiduk, Agnieszka McCaleb: Sieci produkcji, innowacji i

informa-cji w Azji: rola instytuinforma-cji ... 81

Marta Najda-Janoszka, Karolina Nessel: Czy liberalizacja ekonomiczna

zmieniła filipińskie sieci biznesowe? Studium przypadku małego biura podróży ... 92

Chris Weston: Korea Północna i jej specjalne strefy ekonomiczne: nowe sieci

powiązań z globalną ekonomią? ... 108

Marta Wincewicz-Bosy: Sieci podmiotów gospodarczych wyścigów

kon-nych na przykładzie Japan Racing Association (JRA) ... 118

Anna Żyła: Międzynarodowe sieci produkcji jako czynnik wzrostu

atrakcyj-ności inwestycyjnej krajów należących do ASEAN ... 129

Marcin Jałowiecki: Rynek dóbr luksusowych w Chinach ... 139 Karolina Klupś-Orłowska: Chiny jako nowy kierunek ekspansji

producen-tów dóbr luksusowych na przykładzie działań Louis Vuitton Moët Hen-nessy ... 149

Karolina Łopacińska: Chiński model zarządzania w aspekcie

konkurencyj-ności przedsiębiorstw na rynku międzynarodowym ... 160

Thanh Nguyen: Wietnamskie społeczności rybackie: przewagi geograficzne

i konflikty czy suwerenność terytorialna? ... 168

(5)

PRACE NAUKOWE UNIWERSYTETU EKONOMICZNEGO WE WROCŁAWIU RESEARCH PAPERS OF WROCŁAW UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS nr 295●2013

ISSN 1899-3192 Clusters, Networks and Markets in the Asia-Pacific Region

Sebastian Bobowski

Wrocław University of Economics

KNOWLEDGE CLUSTER INITIATIVES BY MEXT

1

CASE OF TOKAI REGION NANOTECHNOLOGY

MANUFACTURING CLUSTER IN JAPAN

2

Abstract: Knowledge Cluster Initiative by MEXT provides support facilities and promotes

local outward-oriented initiatives of industry-academia-government collaboration in order to internationalize cluster structures and boost technological revolution. Tokai Region Cluster is an interesting example of intensive spillovers among private and public actors integrated around common vision of progress.

Keywords: knowledge cluster initiative, Tokai Region.

1. Introduction

Linking cluster initiatives with the concept of knowledge-based economy has become the core issue of Japanese cluster policy by Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). Between 1996 and 2015 four Basic Plans of Science and Technology were designed and implemented in order to reach four different stages of transformation of cluster policy:

– First Basic Plan of Science and Technology (Financial Years 1996–2000) – Foundation of Regional R&D;

– Second Basic Plan of Science and Technology (Financial Years 2001–2005) – Start of the Cluster Policy;

– Third Basic Plan of Science and Technology (Financial Years 2006–2010) – Implementation of Cluster Policy;

– Fourth Basic Plan of Science and Technology (Financial Years 2011–2015) – Development of Cluster Policy.

1 Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan.

2 Article based on empirical data collected by author during research made in Tokyo and Nagoya,

Japan, between 6th and 21st October 2012 under research project no. 2011/01/B/HS4/00639 entitled

“Clusters as innovation carrier of enterprises and regions. Verification and implementation of Asian models in terms of the Polish economy”, funded by National Science Centre, Poland.

(6)

28

Sebastian Bobowski

The aim of the article is to present empirical dimension of MEXT cluster policy, focused on promotion and formation of regional knowledge-based clusters, initiated under second stage of cluster policy.

Tokai Region Nanotechnology Manufacturing Cluster is a great example of The Second Stage Knowledge Cluster Initiative, challenging energy conservation, environment preservation, renewable energy, global competitiveness and paradigm shift in industrial sector. Tokai Region, covering Aichi, Gifu, Mie Prefectures and Nagoya City, is a leading Japanese automobile, aircraft, machinery and their parts centre, accumulating nearly 10% of Japanese GDP.

According to MEXT, enhancing industry-academia-government collaboration at the regional level should induce both development of world-class clusters (Knowledge Cluster Initiative) and small clusters based on regional strengths (City Area Program).

2. Cluster structures

Clusters are, according to M.E. Porter, the exemplification of a typical paradox that “the competitive advantage in the global economy is based increasingly on local resources, such as knowledge, relationships and motivations that are not available for distant competitors.”3 He defined clusters as a geographical concentration of

interconnected companies, specialized suppliers, service providers, businesses operating in related sectors, as well as related institutions (such as financial, training, research, standardization institutions and trade associations), in specific areas, while competing and cooperating with each other. Thus, a departure from the traditional understanding of the role of location,4 on the one hand, reflects significant changes

in the field of technology and competition, on the other – points to the serious implications in the acquisition of resources on a global scale. It turns out that the cluster structures may become, when reaching an appropriate critical mass, an instrument of competition policy under the dynamic knowledge-based economy.5

Modern theoretical approaches move away from a Marshall’s industrial district for the extended manufacturing cluster model based on SMEs, while taking into account the growth of service clusters, operating in high-technology sectors, increasing importance of TNCs, network-affiliated international companies, and finally – the contribution of public and private institutions.6

3 M.E. Porter, Clusters and the new economics of competition, Harvard Business Review 1998,

November–December, Reprint No. 98609, p. 78.

4 M.E. Porter, Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global

econ-omy, Economic Development Quarterly 2000, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–34.

5 According to M.E. Porter, clusters affect competition in three ways: by increasing business

ductivity, by stimulating innovation, by determining future productivity growth and initiating the pro-cess of creating new businesses to strengthen the cluster (based on: M.E. Porter, Clusters and the new economics… of Competition, p. 80).

6 OECD, Competitive Regional Clusters. National Policy Approaches, OECD Reviews of

Region-al Innovation, Paris 2007, pp. 25, 26.

(7)

Knowledge cluster initiatives by MEXT

29

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) argues in its report on the issue of competitive regional clusters that “countries are seeking ways to strengthen or develop the potential enabling a concentration of innovative companies associated with the structures of the knowledge economy [...] clusters are considered as effective and pragmatic instrument of managing resources and building partnerships.”7 OECD, conducting research dedicated to critical for

knowledge-based economy innovation clusters, indicates the role of both business entities as “knowledge-generating agents and consumers,”8 while distinguishing traditional and

modern concept of cluster (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of traditional and knowledge cluster

Item Traditional Knowledge

Phase of life mature sectors, shaped concentration young sectors, new concentrations Type of relationships/

transactions long-term relationships, shaped by locally oriented supply chains temporary coalitions for joint R&D activities induced by the market Innovation activities gradual innovations, absorption of

technologies technological innovations

Source: own study based on: European Commission and Enterprise Directorate-General, Regional

Clusters in Europe: Observatory of European SMEs, no. 3, Brussels 2002.

The increase of cluster structures associated with knowledge-based economy will generate significant multiplier effects, encouraged increasingly by external location determinants and structural transformation of the regions (very often specific agglomerations), resulting in the intensification of R&D activities.9

3. Overview of MEXT’s cluster policy

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, when designing cluster policy, complement activities of Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI).10 While METI is oriented on support for the commercialization of research

7 OECD, Competitive Regional Clusters…, p. 11; J.L. Furman, M.E. Porter and S. Stern point to

cluster structures environment as one of the key components of the innovation potential of the country, next to the institutional, resource and political frameworks (based on: J.L. Furman, M.E. Porter, S. Stern, The determinants of national innovative capacity, Research Policy 2002, vol. 31, p. 905).

8 See also: OECD, Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach, OECD Publications, Paris 1999;

OECD, Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems, OECD Publications, Paris 2001.

9 For further studies see: P. Dicken, Global Shift: Transforming the World Economy, Paul

Chapman, London 2003; S. Bobowski, M. Haberla, Networked clusters in the context of

knowledge-seeking strategy of international business, [in:] B. Skulska, A.H. Jankowiak (Eds.) Innovation Sources of Economies in Eastern Asia, Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics No. 256,

Publishing House of Wrocław University of Economics, Wrocław 2012, pp. 121–131.

10 However, some interviewees admitted that the distribution of competences among MEXT and

(8)

30

Sebastian Bobowski

results and development of sales channels, MEXT is focused on support for the formation of intellectual assets and for the development of human resources.

Knowledge Cluster Initiative by MEXT is a component of Regional Innovation Program, initiated till the end of 2010, in parallel with Third Basic Plan of Science and Technology (see Table 2 for details).

Table 2. Transformation of cluster policy by MEXT, 1996–2015

First Basic Plan

of Science and Technology 1996–2000 Foundation of Regional

R&D – increasing public awareness of S&T, promoting basic and pioneering R&D, and constructing S&T-related facilities – creating and expanding various research systems

Second Basic Plan

of Science and Technology 2001–2005 Start of the Cluster Policy – formation of regional knowledge-based clusters

– implementation of S&T policies in regions through fostering and providing expert human resources, enhancing coordination, and promoting interregional technological transfers, further promoting industry-academia-government collaboration in the region Third Basic Plan

of Science and Technology 2006–2010 Implementation of Cluster

Policy – formation of regional clusters through selective support to regions that have the potential to develop as world-class clusters – developing small clusters with strengths that utilize regional

characteristics Fourth Basic Plan

of Science and Technology 2011–2015 Development of Cluster

Policy – building of regional innovation systems enabling local communities to independently develop STI activities that capitalize on their strengths – providing well-performed local clusters with governmental support in networking, fostering and securing of human resources, intellectual property activities concerning R&D and the promotion of R&D Source: based on documentation provided by MEXT, Tokyo, during empirical research made by the

author in October 2012.

When analysing the evolution of MEXT cluster policy through the years, it should be noted that governmental policy has been more and more closely linked with decentralization of development policies, in order to combine local assets and advantages with strategic goals of sustainable growth and societal development boosted by innovations.

Moreover, regionally designed innovation policies within the framework of MEXT policy were proposed to reorient and activate local capabilities for devel-

(9)

Knowledge cluster initiatives by MEXT

31

opment. Therefore, decentralization might be found as relative when recognizing direct linkages between local initiatives, their performance and significance, and governmental support, based on top-down system of evaluation and selection.

4. Cluster concept by MEXT

MEXT perceive cluster as a network among industry, academia and government focused on generating and promoting innovative chain reactions (Figure 1). According to MEXT, cluster structure should be based on tight collaboration and frequent communication among the participants, provide various new technological “seeds,” while attracting external human resources, companies, information and capital.

Figure 1. Cluster concept by MEXT

Source: own study by the author.

5. Regional Innovation Cluster Program

Knowledge Cluster Initiative, supporting the formation of world-class clusters, is expected to encourage and deepen regional independence of innovation policies. Local governments are expected to design core organizations responsible for collaboration with universities, companies and other relevant organizations to initiate

universities companies

supporting organization

CLUSTER

entry of new companies

inflow of human resources

funding

(10)

32

Sebastian Bobowski

joint research projects, while being provided with projects of other ministries and agencies, i.e. R&D projects undertaken by METI or Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), and local organizations, i.e. business groups and universities. Core organizations take the responsibility for realization of regionally designed cluster vision while local government submit his vision to MEXT for evaluation to get subsidies (Figure 2).

6. Quantitative results of Knowledge Cluster Initiatives

According to data provided by MEXT, between 2002 and 2012 127 projects within 75 regions were implemented, inducing investments of 120 billion JPY (1.2 billion EUR).

Majority of cluster initiatives has been concentrated around life sciences (e.g. Kansai Area Cluster, Kansai Science City and Surrounding, Takamatsu, Tokushima, Ehime Nanyo, Central Oita, Toyama Ishikiwa, Niigata, Central Akita, Hirosaki, Sapporo, Tokachi, Fukushima, Okinawa Coastal, Hiroshima, Yamaguchi, Kurume, Nagasaki, Toyohashi), nanotechnology/materials (e.g. Tokai Region, Kyoto, Hamamatsu, Yamagata Yonezawa, Fukui Central, Onoda and Shimonoseki, Fukuoka Figure 2. Regional Innovation Cluster Program

Source: based on documentation provided by MEXT, Tokyo, during empirical research made by the author in October 2012.

Core organizations

Companies and other relevant organizations Local governments

Projects of Other Ministries

and Agencies Projects of Local Organizations Regional cluster visions

Collaboration Collaboration Collaboration Subsidization

Collaboration Contract research Collaboration

Universities Proposal Planning Designation MEXT PN-295-Cluster..._Jankowiak.indb 32 2014-01-29 09:21:40

(11)

Knowledge cluster initiatives by MEXT

33

Chikushi, Kumamoto, Ehime Eastern, Centrai of Osaka, Osaka Izumi), production engineering (e.g. Southern Okayama, Osaka East, Matsuyama, Harima, Southern Ishikawa, Nagaoka, Utsunomiya and Central Tochigi, Yokohama Inland, Western Tono), environment (e.g. Fukui Wakasa, Shinjiko and Nakaumi, Fukuoka Chikushi, Saga Ariake Sea Coastal, Southern Kumamoto, Miyakonojo Basin, Yoneshiro-river Basin, Kasumigaura Southern Coastal City, Kanto Plain Saitarna, East Kanagawa, Shonan and Central Kanagawa, Yamanashi Kuninaka, Tokai Region), energy (e.g. Fukui Wakasa, Fukuoka Chikushi, Hachinohe, Kasumigaura Southern Coastal City, Yamanshi Kuninaka) and IT (e.g. Fukuoka Kitakyushu Iizuka, Osaka Izumi, Southern Ishikawa, Sapporo, Mutsu-Ogawara, Sendai, Tsukuba Science City, Hamamatsu, Southern Gifu)11 sector.

In financial years 2002–2011, according to calculations, 3064 domestic and 647 international patents were provided, 3501 domestic and 8320 international articles were published, 2238 ideas were commercialized/incorporated, while the sale of related products reached approximately 56.7 billion JPY (2.3 billion EUR). When comparing with City Area Program under Regional Innovation Cluster Program, presented achievements do confirm the primacy of outward orientation and globalization of Japanese clusters over local orientation, assuming creation of new businesses and R&D businesses that utilize unique regional resources within small to medium-size clusters.

Tokai Region provides interesting findings and characteristics of The Second Stage Knowledge Cluster Initiative, aiming at global expansion within nanotechnology manufacturing.

7. Tokai Region Nanotechnology Manufacturing Cluster

Cluster Program of Tokai Region was built on two pillars:

1) R&D on advanced nano-manufacturing technology for environment friendly materials and devices;

2) sustainable innovation cluster, assuming efficient industry-government-academia network, knowledge exchange networking (needs/seeds), between academia and industry, while providing facility support through government policy. Tokai Region Cluster is a very well organized and promoted project, with Nagoya Industries Promotion Corporation, core agency located in Aichi Prefecture and R&D foundation from Gifu Prefecture cooperating under Knowledge Cluster Initiative Headquarter (Figure 3).

Research themes are directly correlated, transferring services and technologies (see Table 3 for details).

(12)

34

Sebastian Bobowski

Figure 3. Organization of Tokai Region Cluster Project Promotion

Source: based on documentation provided by Tokai Region Cluster Headquarters and Aichi Science & Technology Foundation, Nagoya, during empirical research made by author in October 2012.

Gifu Research & Development Foundation Nagoya Industries

Promotion Corporation

Honorary Chairman (Toyota Motor Co.)

President (Nagoya University) President (Toyota Motor Co.)

Vice President (ASTF)

Science & Technology Coordinators (4) International Collaboration Coordinators (2) Technology Transfer Coordinator (1) Advisers

Office

Association for promotion of R&D seeds to practical uses in regional SMEs

Theme 1 Theme 2 Theme 3 Theme 4 Expansion Program

Nagoya City Aichi Prefecture Gifu Prefecture

Knowledge Cluster Initiative Headquarter

Core Agency: Aichi Science & Technology Foundation

Executive Director Project Director Chief Scientist (Toyohashi

Deputy Project Director University of Technology)

Deputy Chief Scientist

General Affairs Division Operational Department

Science & Technology Coordinator Priority Research Project

management office Cluster Manager Research theme PN-295-Cluster..._Jankowiak.indb 34 2014-01-29 09:21:40

(13)

Knowledge cluster initiatives by MEXT

35

Table 3. Overview of research themes by Tokai Region Cluster

Research

Theme Objectives

Research

Theme 1 Development of advanced plasma nanotechnologyTotal plasma control with plasma nanoscience – High-density radical source

– Plasma measurement – Plasma control technology

– Atmospheric plasma and liquid plasma technology Research

Theme 2 Development of advanced nanomaterials through surface functionalityDevelopment of nanomaterials with novel surface functions – Nano-carbon materials (solution plasma application)

– Ceramic materials

– Organic/inorganic hybrid nanomaterials Research

Theme 3 Development of highly-efficient optical, power materials and devicesDevelopment of GaN/Si semiconductors and device application – Large diameter GaN/Si substrates

– InGaN nanostructure materials – Device process technology Research

Theme 4 Development of nanocomposites based on surface & interface engineering– Precision machine tools for CRRP – Environment-friendly nanocomposites

Expansion

Program Construction of Advanced Plasma Nanotechnology Research Foundation– Development of high performance plasma processing technology (international collaboration researches)

– International Symposium on Advanced Plasma Science and its Applications (ISPlasma) Source: based on documentation provided by Tokai Region Cluster Headquarters and Aichi Science &

Technology Foundation, Nagoya, during empirical research made by author in October 2012.

Research conducted under Theme 1 provides plasma diagnostics and plasma surface treatment to Theme 2, plasma MBE (Molecular Beam Epitaxy) and plasma etching to Theme 3, Theme 2 exchange surface & interface technology with Theme 4, while Expansion Program induce international collaboration within Theme 1 and Theme 3.

8. R&D management in Tokai Region Cluster

According to the concept by Dr. H. Schmidt, there are five R&D phases of potential interactions and contributions of academia and industry:

– basic study,

– elemental technology development, – product development,

– mass-production technology, and – business.

(14)

36

Sebastian Bobowski

Although, transfers of basic research results from academia to the industry in the business phase are forbidden, knowledge might be exchanged among industry and academia in the first four phases, while technology transfer from academia to industry should take place in the mass-production technology phase.

Nagoya Model provides a set of definitions of each R&D phase (see Table 4 for details).

Table 4. R&D phases according to Nagoya Model

R&D phase Definition Fundamental Research for

Application Research to yield Innovative Technical Seeds which can be used by Industry Applied

Research Unit Technology Incubation of the Seeds for Specified Product Target and the Auxiliary Technologies Product

Development Integration of the Unit Technologies to complete Product Target, and Prototype Production Mass Production

Technology Mass Production Technology Development of Product Target (infrastructure for trial production) Business Business Model

Product Commercialization

Source: based on documentation provided by Tokai Region Cluster Headquarters and Aichi Science & Technology Foundation, Nagoya, during empirical research made by author in October 2012.

Referring to Schmidt concept, research units operating within Tokai Region Cluster, i.e. Nagoya University and Toyohashi University of Technology, should be oriented on applicable studies to be potentially used by industry, subordinate applied research to complete product target and support prototype production through knowledge exchange. Mass production technologies, developed within academia, are to be transferred to industry in the 4th R&D phase, while inflow of knowledge

from academia to industry in the last phase – product commercialization – is uncertain.

Tokai Region Cluster has developed various platforms and organizations for technology transfer (Figure 4).

Different research institutes, laboratories and universities are concentrated around knowledge hubs and centers coordinated by Tokai Region Cluster Headquarters within four dimensions: Materials, Devices, Nano Characterization and Plasma Technology.

Foreign partners in plasma technologies are engaged within International Plasma CoE Network – Plasma Nanotechnology Center located at the Nagoya University cooperates closely with research units from South Korea, United States, Australia, Germany, France, Ireland, Netherlands, United Kingdom and Italy.

(15)

Knowledge cluster initiatives by MEXT

37

1 Synchroton Radiation; 2 High Voltage Electron Microscope.

Figure 4. R&D platforms and organization for technology transfer within Tokai Region Cluster

Source: based on documentation provided by Tokai Region Cluster Headquarters and Aichi Science & Technology Foundation, Nagoya, during empirical research made by the author in October 2012.

International collaboration is combined with intensive regional activities suppor-ted by local governments:

1. Installments of Regional Innovation Facilities – Aichi Center for Industry and Science Technology, – Technological Innovation Center Gifu,

– Plasma Science for Industrial Application.

2. Theme-based Workshops such as seminars of the Cluster Achievements and the related Topics, the Schooling and the Coaching

– Plasma Application Monozukuri (PLAM) Workshop, – Highly Functional Nanomaterial Workshop,

– Nitride Semiconductor Application Workshop, – Aircraft Material and Process Workshop.

Collaboration (headquarter

Materials Devices

Green Vehicle Material Green Mobility Research Center for

Research Lab Research Center Nano Device and

(Nagoya University) (Nagoya University) System (NITECH)

National Composite Electron Device Research

Center Center (Toyohashi

(Nagoya University) University of Technology)

Gifu University Composite LED Joint Research

Materials Center Technological Center (Meijo University) Innovation Center Gifu

Aichi Center for Industry & Science Technology

Plasma Nanotechnology Chubu SOR1 Facility Center (Nagoya University)

Aichi Knowledge Hub

Plasma Center for Nanostructures Research HVEM2 lab Industrial Application

Lab (JFCC) (Nagoya University) (Nagoya City)

(16)

38

Sebastian Bobowski

3. Support of Public R&D, Technology Transfer to the Regional SMEs

– Projects for Utilization and Promotion of the Achievements of the Tokai Cluster, – R&D Projects for Industrial Application of Plasma Technology,

– Joint Industry-Academia-Government Research Projects.

Therefore, management within Tokai Region Cluster might be studied through the prism of plan-do-check-adjust (PDCA) cycle, because every implemented action and executed task is preceded by brainstorm session, inputs consideration, objectives planning, followed by evaluation, data analysis and recommendations formulation. Local governments take the responsibility for visualization of cluster initiative outcomes and effective utilization of regional activities. Finally, R&D processes are managed using multiphase Nagoya Model. Various Innovation Platforms and Organizations are designed in the form of networks to locate R&D facilities near industries.

9. Tokai Region Cluster results

Regional Cluster Initiative have already resulted in a few successful R&D results within Theme 1, 2, 3 and 4 (see Table 5 for details).

Table 5. Tokai Region Cluster – R&D results

R&D Objective R&D Results

Research Theme 1: Development of Advanced Plasma Nanotechnology Precise control of plasma

and construction of plasma science

Element technologies for an autonomous control of plasma nano-process Effectiveness of the autonomous control of plasma nano etching Scientific researches of radical species in plasma lead to plasma process optimization

Research Theme 2: Development of Advanced Nanomaterials through Surface Functionality R&D of advanced

functional materials through surface modification

Stable growth discharge plasma in solutions Expansion of the SP technology

Reaction promotion, cluster formation, and surface modification Nanoparticles as electrode catalysts in metal-air battery and H2-fuel cell Research Theme 3: Development of highly-efficient optical, power Materials and Devices GaN/Si heteroepi

semiconductors and power device applications

MOCVD equipment for large-diameter GaN/Si substrate

High quality 6 inch GaN/Si leads to low cost and high performance power devices

All Japan power device R&D centre in Nagoya Institute of Technology Research Theme 4: Development of Nanocomposites based on Surface & Interface engineering Development of new

carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) and ultra-precision machine tools

By the centrifugal sintering casting method, abrasive grains functionally graded grinding wheels with 20 mm were successfully fabricated and the gyro-driving grinding wheel machine, which can make high quality holes on CFRP by using the unique technique, was developed

Source: based on documentation provided by Tokai Region Cluster Headquarters and Aichi Science & Technology Foundation, Nagoya, during empirical research made by author in October 2012.

(17)

Knowledge cluster initiatives by MEXT

39

Four separate research fields, led by specialists from Nagoya University and Nagoya Institute of Technology, should encourage the advancement of plasma nanotechnology and utilization of nanomaterial and device technologies at key junctures, promote the use of environment-friendly advanced materials and processing technologies by regional SMEs.

Meanwhile, Expansion Program is expected to reinforce personnel development and international collaboration, to promote international industry collaboration, research seminars aimed at smooth transfer of research achievements within academia-industry-government network.

Since 2009 five annual International Symposiums on Advanced Plasma Science and its Applications for Nitrides and Nanomaterials (ISPlasma) were organized in order to create a world leading international foundation for advanced plasma nanotechnology science. In March 2010 Tokai Region Cluster Headquarters have concluded a partnership agreement with the research and development foundation MINATEC, located in France – world leader in the field of nanotechnology.

According to the roadmap provided by Tokai Region Cluster Headquarters R&D activities within optical/power device components, fundamental plasma nanotechno-logy, nanomaterials and processing, conducted through the network of five industry-academia-government partnership centrer and six collaboration centrer, should contribute to development of next-generation industries, offering green vehicles, aircrafts, environment-friendly materials and processing, medical devices and environmental conservation, etc.

10. Conclusions

Knowledge Cluster Initiative by MEXT combine clustering with the concept of knowledge-based economy, seeking for effective frameworks of future growth strategy. R&D management in terms of Nagoya Model, visualization of outcomes and actions according to PDCA cycle, accompanied by utilization of regional advantages, result, in case of Tokai Region Cluster, in significant achievements within plasma technology, GaN/Si Epi technology and ultra-precision machines. Expansion of network type innovation platform involving international partners may increasingly strengthen global performance of Japanese economy.

References

Bobowski S., Haberla M., Networked clusters in the context of knowledge-seeking strategy of

interna-tional business, [in:] B. Skulska, A.H. Jankowiak (Eds.) Innovation Sources of Economies in Eastern Asia, Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics No. 256, Publishing House of

Wrocław University of Economics, Wrocław 2012.

(18)

40

Sebastian Bobowski European Commission and Enterprise Directorate-General, Regional Clusters in Europe: Observatory

of European SMEs, no. 3, Brussels 2002.

Furman J.L., Porter M.E., Stern S., The determinants of national innovative capacity, Research Policy 2002, vol. 31.

OECD, Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach, OECD Publications, Paris 1999.

OECD, Competitive Regional Clusters. National Policy Approaches, OECD Reviews of Regional In-novation, Paris 2007.

OECD, Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems, OECD Publications, Paris 2001. Porter M.E., Clusters and the new economics of competition, Harvard Business Review 1998,

Novem-ber–December, Reprint No. 98609.

Porter M.E., Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy,

Economic Development Quarterly 2000, vol. 14, no. 1.

INICJATYWA KLASTRA WIEDZY MEXT –

PRZYKŁAD KLASTRA NANOTECHNOLOGICZNEGO REGIONU TOKAI W JAPONII

Streszczenie: Inicjatywa Klastra Wiedzy MEXT przewiduje wsparcie rzeczowe i promocyjne

lokalnych inicjatyw współpracy przemysłu, środowiska nauki i rządu na potrzeby umiędzyna-rodowienia struktur klastrowych i dynamizacji rewolucji technologicznej. Klaster regionu Tokai stanowi interesujący przykład intensywnych interakcji aktorów prywatnych i publicz-nych zintegrowapublicz-nych wokół wspólnej wizji postępu.

Słowa kluczowe: inicjatywa klastra wiedzy, region Tokai.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Zadania w zakresie kontroli wykonują instytucje tworzące system zarządzania i kontro- li środków UE w ramach poszczególnych programów operacyjnych oraz system instytucji

Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie branżowych specjalizacji specjalnych stref ekonomicznych w kontekście tworzenia potencjalnych klastrów i inicjatyw klastrowych 2..

Technologia nie jest zatem nauką, gdyż nauka (jako wcześniejszy etap procesu tech- nologicznego) nie została jeszcze zastosowana w praktyce lub skomercjalizowana. Technologia nie

ze względu na sposób uregulowania przez ustawodawcę, możliwe staje się wypunktowanie pew- nego rodzaju niedociągnięć, nieprawidłowości, skutkujących osłabieniem zjawiska

Dla zapewnienia efektywności działań rozwojowych kluczowe jest więc zapewnienie elastyczności w aktualizacji zrównoważonej karty wyników w oparciu o zasadę ciągłego uczenia

W tym celu zebrano 12 600 danych finansowych ze 150 przemysłowych zakładów mięsnych z lat 2010-2015 w zakresie wartości przychodów ze sprzedaży (netto), środków trwałych,

Bardzo wyraźne różnice wskazuje natomiast struktura odpowiedzi, w przypadku doradztwa świad- czonego przez doradców, którzy zostali wybrani na bazie dobrych doświadczeń

Realizacja koncepcji partnerstwa benchmarkingowego jest uzasadniona przez przedsiębiorstwa funkcjonujące w środowisku klastrowym ze względu na osobliwo- ści i kluczowe