LA,
v. ...Sch,?:,Tr!nu,vAnde
,
1JCi1001
INVESTIGATION ON THE EFFECT
OF THE ANGULAR VELOCITY
OF STEERING UPON
THE PERFORMANCE OF RUDDER
(
Hydrodynamical Research of Ship's Rudder )
The First
Report--By S. OKADA, Ba. Eng. (Kogakushi)
The Technical Research Laboratory
Hitachi Shipbuilding & Engineering Co., Ltd.
INVESTIM.TION ON THE EFFECT OF THE ANGULAR VELOCITY OF STEERING UPON THE PERFORMANCE OF RUDDER
/ Hydrodynamical Research of Ship's Rudder \ The First Report
By Shojiro OKADA, Ba.Eng.
The Technical Research Laboratory
Hitachi Shipbuilding & Engineering Co.,Ltd.
Table of Contents
Abstract 1
Introduction 3
Theoretical Consideration 5
2.1 Circulation round the non-stationary aerofoil 7
2.2 Force and moment acting upon rudder 13
2.3 Method for solution of the integral equation
to determine the distribution of free vortex 16
2.4 Example of numerical calculation 22
Experiments on models 30
3.1 Experimental apparatus and method 30
3.2 On the non-dimensional expression of forces
acting upon the rudder 35
3.3 Law of similitude and effect of scale 37
3.4 Experimental results, and comparison with
the results of theoretical calculations 43
3.5 Other effects on the performance of rudder 49
Conclusion 58
---ABSTRACT
In the field of ship-hydrodynamics in which resistance, propulsion and steering are principal objects of study, it
seemed that so many problems related to these subject matters, particularly those connected with rudder, were
remaining unsolved. Therefore the author conducted a
survey on the twisting moment acting upon the rudder-stock taking advantage of the opportunities of sea-trials of several large cargo vessels in the 1951-1952 period and
made report on the results. The phenomena as observed
with actual vessels were very much complicated, and in
many points difficult to comprehend. In this respect, the
author stated in the conclusion of his report that further theoretical study and investigations were required to be made on the basis of experiments on accurate models.
Fortunately such chance was made available for the author. So he contemplated to make an all-over investigation in
forces acting upon the rudder-stock. In this paper (Report
I), the performance of open rudder, the related theoretical calculation and the results of experiments on models on the effect of angular velocity of steering are dealt with as the preliminary problems to enter into the question of the effect of propeller race.
From the results of theoretical calculations in con-nection with the effect of angular velocity of steering as obtained, in accordance with the vortex theory with due consideration of dynamic effects, the following facts have
been made clear:
N.P
The twisting moment acting upon the rudder-stock
develops to be greater than that in the stationary condition owing to the effect of the angular velocity of steering.
In this case, the lift acting upon the rudder-stock can be divided into two, namely, the one acting upon the point behind * of the chord-length from its leading edge, and the other acting upon the middle point of rudder.
The lift acting upon the point behind of the chord
length is the function of the angular velocity of steering and the rudder angle, while the lift acting upon the point behind .J2- of the chord length is the function of the angular
velocity of steering alone.
The twisting moment acting upon the rudder-stock increases by the effect of angular velocity of steering, but the nature and the status of such an increment differ very much depending upon the location of the center of
rudder-stock. The amount of such an increase grows larger
as the position of the center of rudder-stock shifts
rear-wards, provided that the location of the center of
rudder-stock is within the range of the chord-length.
In addition to the fact that the results of model tests
confirmed the above points, it was also ascertained that
when such experiments are made in a circulating channel,
reasonable results can be obtained even in case Reynold's
number is so small as
0.1x
106.
(1)
1. INTRODUCTION
Within the scope of ship's hydrodynamics, of which
resistance, propulsion and steering are the main object of study, there still remains many problems pending for
solution. Problems related to the hull, propeller and
rudder also belong to such important items outstanding. On the basis of the hull, the phenomena related to these three subject matters are covered by the conception of the so-called "hull efficiency", which takes principally wake
and thrust deduction into consideration. When these very
same subject matters are considered on the basis of the
propeller, they are termed the "relative rotative efficiency", in which investigations have been conducted in the past to
a fairly minute degree. In the mean time, studies relating
to these subjects on the basis of the rudder seem to be
limited in their number as compared with the above-mentioned two branches of studies with exception of several reports
(1),(2),(3),(4) and (5), in the author's
knowledge.The
author desired to obtain some clues to solve these out-standing questions by the investigation centering around the rudder, and conducted the spot-surveys on the twisting moment acting upon the rudder-stock on the occasion of the
sea-trials of several large freighters in the course of 1951..1952, publishing their experimental results in an article titled "On the Twisting Moment Acting upon the
Ship's Rudder-Stock". The phenomena as observed with
actual vessels were both complicated and difficult to
-understand in many points, and the author stated in the conclusion of his paper that he contemplated to conduct
further theoretical study and experiments on models. This
time it had been made available for him to utilize a
circulating channel for such experiments, hence he planned an all-over study to confirm the results of the afore-mentioned spot surveys, in addition to the reexamination
of force acting upon the rudder.
In considering the force acting upon the rudder, even putting aside the effects of various aerofoil section which affect the rudder performance in the case of open
rudder, there are involved such related problems as the relative size of rudder and propeller, air draw, and many other questions in addition to the effect of the propeller race, and the dynamic effects of the angular velocity of steering.
The present study deals with these problems, particularly
forces acting upon the rudder centering around the effect
of propeller race.
This first paper principally involves the theoretical
calculations and the results of experiments on models
carried out in connection with the performance of the open
rudder and the effects of angular velocity of steering acting upon the open rudder as the preliminary problems
prior to entering into the question of the effect of
propeller race and other questions, description will be
2. THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS
In the case of a rudder under water, when an angle of incidence against the direction of the flow, or a rudder angle, is applied to the rudder, normal force is generated with the rudder, which develops into the turning moment of ship. In this case, the normal force caused to the rudder
has substantial effect not only on the ship's turning performance but proves an important factor to decide the
capacity of the steering engine. Hence attempts were made
to assume this normal force by Mr. JOssel(6) abroad and
Dr. Aka#aki(7) in'apan, and also by many other people(8)
(9)(1o) Besides, the rudder may well be regarded as an
aerofoil with a low aspect-ratio, and relating to aerofoil sections, experiments were made with a great many of models
(12)
in Gbttingen(11) and N.A.C.A. . Regarding the effects
of aspect-ratio, rudder section and rudder outline, Dr.
Akaraki(7 Dr.
Lammeren(lN
Mr. Gawn(14)and many otherpeople have previously conducted fairely detailed investi-gations.
However, in these investigations irrespective as to whether they were theoretical or experimental, the problem
was mostly handled on the stationary" basis, and it seems
that almost none of them discussed as to the effect of angular velocity of steering.
The angular velocity of steering in the present day ships
are, of course, not so great as may need handling with
For instance, compared with the magnitude of the normal force incidental in dealing with the ship's turning
performance, the effect of the angular velocity of steering
may be of a negligible degree. However, in considering the
twisting moment acting upon the rudder-stock which will directly be necessary in dealing with the capacity of the steering engine, it appears that even a slight effect can bear much influence upon the rudder performance, because the center of the rudder axis and that of water pressure are
located so much adjacent to each other. Hence the present
study was decided to be made.
The question of non-stationary aerofoil as viewed from the standpoint of the vortex theory has already been dealt with on the occasion of investigations relating principally
to the non-stationary motion of aircrafts by Birnbaum(15),
Wagner(16), Glapert(17), Theodorsen(18) von KArmAn(19)
and others, and solution has already been reached as to
simple motion. In discussing the question of non-stationary
phase of the rudder, the author also intends to proceed with the question in accordance with the circulation theory.
(Other methods, for instance, such as that based on the
acceleration potential, may also be suggested, but it has
alredy been affirmed by Prof.Kondoh(20)that the same result
may be obtained from either of the methods. Therefore, the
author is going to follow the circulation theory.) In
dealing with an object shaped like a rudder, it should,
sense. However, it has already been ascertained by Mr.
Tohnes(21) that the effect of a finite wing on the
non-stationary lift is insignificant. Henceforth, for the sake
of simplicity, the rudder was replaced with a two-dimensional
thin aerofoil is advancing through fluid which expands to an
infinite extent.
2.1 Circulation round the Non-stationary Aerofoil
According to the aerofoil theory, when an aerofoil
under-goes a change in its condition of motion, it induces a change
in the circulation
r
round the aerofoil section, and a freevortex of the opposing direction of a corresponding magnitude
leaves the trailing edge and flows down stream. In
observance with the theory of thin aerofoil, and assuming
that the attack angle and the camber of the aerofoil section
are insignificant, it can be concluded that the change in
the position by the mutual effects of free vortex may be
omissible. Assumed that the aerofoil starts motion from a
stationary condition at time t=0, and proceeds in the
negative direction of the axis x at a uniform rate, and that
the free vortex remains at the position where it was
generated, the free vortices will form a vortex layer along
the axis x.
Now, let the advancing velocity of the rudder be V, the
circulation round the rudder
r,
and the intensity of thefree vortex at the distance s down stream from the trailing
1 di'
k(s)
= --
(1)V dt
However, it is required that the right side of (1) is calculated on the basis of the time when the trailing edge of the rudder passed the point s.
When this is expressed as: ,t
V = / V dt (2)
0
the following equation is given:
k(s)=- [dr
(3)d t _
where k(s) is the function of(r-s)alone, and should be expressed as k(r-s).
V
Fig.1
When the equation (3) is integrated, a equation
expressing that there is not present any circulation round the closing curve involving the aerofoil and free vortex was obtained.
rk( s)ds = 0 ( 4)
Now, assuming that the rudder is a plate rudder for the sake of simplicity, let a represent the rudder angle, c the
chord length of rudder, and x= 0 the center of the chord
length. V is to denote the velocity of motion advancing in the negative direction of x, and suppose the center of the rudder-stock is located at the point H which is at the
distance he from the leading edge of rudder. Normally,
there is no objection to assume this to be within the extent
of 0<(h=1. Suppose the rudder is steered centering about
the center of rudder-stock H at the angular velocity of (the clockwise direction is positive), each points of the rudder is presumed to hold the following velocity in the direction of y as appearing in Fig.1, if the boundary condition on the rudder is taken into consideration.
da
- 2h)
+x}-) dt
This may be rewritten as
da da
Va+
T(1 -
2h) + xdt dt
The second term of this equation represents the velocity of the y direction which can be determined when the central point of the rudder stock and the steering velocity are
given. Since a common velocity is appricable to each
points of the rudder, let Wi stand for it, and then the following equation will be given:
da Va+ W1+ x
-dt
da
where W1= (1 - 2h)
2 dt
Thus the equation (5) expresses the velocity of y direction at every point between the leading edge and the trailing
edge of the rudder. On the other hand, the first
approxi-mation is performed in accordance with the theory of thin aerofoil omitting the thickness of aerofoil, in which the
circulation
r
round the unit length of aerofoil is expressedby the following equation, when x---2-coso
00 1- cos n 0
= 2V a tan - 2 nan
2 1 sin
Accordingly, the induced velocity w(x) of the y direction at the co-ordinates x is,
w(x) =V -a + 2 ci nan
sin
and so the boundary condition on the rudder surface is
filled. Therefore, assuming that the velocity of minus
direction of y at every point of the rudder as expressed in
the equation (5) is equal to -w(x) of the equation (7),
al-
wl2V,
a2=-sin ng (7) C da\ 16V c dt ) (0_0 <rc ) (6)is obtained. By substituting al and a2 in the equation (6),
the distribution of circulation of vortex layer on the rudder, that is,
0 da
ro(x)= 2(Va+ w1) tan +c - sine
2 dt
will be given. This vortex layer is fixed to the rudder,
(8)
and is termed as the bound vortex, relative to the free
vortex which flows away down stream. The circulation r
round the rudder by this bound vortex will be given as
ro
- Je
f
ro(x)dx(2(Va÷vytan+c
sin 0}dx-7
"T
r rP-7 0 da c c 2 dt 2 da (v) ---itc(V a+ w1) 1 4 dtNext, the circulation by the effect of the free vortex
shall be found. For the purpose, let us assume a plate
rudder with the rudder angle 0, and also a vortex with a
strength K located at the position s in the downstream from
the trolling edge of the plate rudder. With this vortex,
its resultant effect on the rudder is to be found.
Now, the z-plane which is regarded as the plate rudder is to be represented to the c-plane by the transform-equation of Joukowski, c2 C
16C
C -2- --I---z=X+ty, Fig.2-Then the plate-rudder on the z-plane, , is
represented to a circle having a radius of *c on the
c-plane, and the vortex K moves to the point c-i+bi-Vcs+s2-r. To fulfil the boundary condition of the vortex K for the circle, it only needs to place a vortex having the strength
of -K at the position of the image r, for the circle of r.
[c\ p,
c s 1
ke
r,-
- +--- cs
s2422
To satisfy the condition within the circle of the vortex having the strength -K, it only requires to place a vortex
with a strength of K at the origin. When the circulation
caused along the rudder is 1-0, the complex velocity potential 0 will easily be found to be as the following equation: iK C (c- Jr' log + log C 27c
C -
27r, K (10) (12)In the above calculation, only one vortex was assumed in the
rear of the rudder. However, since there is no change even
By adopting the Joukowskies hypothesis, that is, water flows away in the direction of its tangent line from the trailing edge, K needs to be decided so that infinitely great velocity will not occur, namely, assuming that
d c c
=0
the following equation is given,
z= Ecos
1
if it is replaced with a vortex layer k(s)ds as shown in Fig.1, and the same result will be obtained therefrom, the
following equation will be got for the circulation round the rudder under the effect of free vortices:
Thus the circulation round the rudder is ultimately given as;
c2 da /c +ss
r = Po+ ze(Va +1111) +7r dt -1--1
1 k(s)ds
4 0 s
(14) This may be simplified by the equation (4),
wc2 daroo
c sn 1ATc(Va+ )+
1 dt s k(s)ds - 0 (15)
in which the integral equation is obtained to determine the
distribution of free vortex k(s) when respective conditions are given.
2.2 Force and Moment Acting upon Rudder
To obtain the force acting upon the rudder, pressure is
to be integrated along its surface. Applying the
Bernoulli's equation,
p = Const - v2 - P
2 Ot
on both port side (suffix:p) and starboard side (suffix:s),
then the difference in pressure between the two sides is
computed, a pp p )(v -v ) 4_ (0 - )
Ps=- 2spsp, , at
Sp
rl
.,,,c)c) s 1 k(s)ds (13) -c(Va + -- (16) (17)However, since vs+vp- 2V, vs-v= r(x), by integrating the equation (17) from the leading edge to the trailing edge, the force L, which is perpendicular to the flow against the rudder, is found.
L =f2(p
c p -s-D 21p-v-r(x 2 dl*=pvr+
dt where I* = P.i; kss-c5D)dx. 2The first term of L is the lift by the Kutta-Joukowski theorem, which is equal to the quasi-stationary lift, to which the time differential of the integral of the pressure product on the rudder surface is added as a non-stationary term. Just the same as circulation, the velocity potential
0 is divided into two and calculated as follows: 1* x c2
+
P 2 -0
and then substituting the equation (14) ,
gc2p d a dV dWi 1-_-_. rcpV(Val-Wi)+ ( 2V dt +a +dt at ) + V P ldx 0 + P -43 )dx at 2 (18) \iCS 9 k(S)dS (19) 2 k(s)ds cz2p da dV dWi pVe k(s)ds = 7repV(Vai-Vi, )+ ( 2V+ a +
j
-1- 4 dt dt at 2 0 v es±s2 (20) 7rc2p da dV ail c +2s ( (V --I- a dt .4. L= Pvr+ 4 at +dt )+V P - , 2 V cs 4- s2]1CS)dS
)dx c +sNext, the moment Mil (the anticlockwise direction is deemed positive.) around the center of the rudder-stock H is found,
2
c di* dN*
+ dt =VPI' o (1-h) - VI- +(-he)
at 2 Vpc ,,x, k(s)ds ... MHz= po____ _ 2h)1 ( zcvp(va+w1 )__,_
j
,/ es +c,3,c,)
_2 2 o Y 4 ,2 7re2P , 2.vda dV +d at dt dt ill 1 )1+ 2-1'p o u a + [-9--(1-2h)]( j 128 dt2 (21) 2 4 'Relating the aforementioned equation (20) to the equation (21), which denotes the moment about the center of the
rudder-stock, the following equation is built up:
L L1+
L2 pVC k( S)dS = 71"CPV(Va+ Wi) + 2 0 VCS S2 n.c2p da dV dWi (2V+a
+ )
4 at at atand by so doing, the equation (21) can be rewritten as follows:
(22)
where N*- pj
(os - op) x dxN* c2 zo4 da + o cs+s2 S ± 2 CS-1-S2 k(s)ds P 10 128 dt 16 2 = P P 2 ,,c - Psit-T- - ho + x)dx 2v4 (cs
)1
(P- -hc + x)dx _ 2 x-p
-(1) t s P -00 -000-C2- 2hd Li 4- 1 - 2h)]L2+1,1m
-c
In the equation (23), [i(-32-- 2h)] indicates the distance
between the center of rudder-stock H nnd the *c point from
the leading edge of the rudder. Besides, since [I, _ 2h,1
expresses the distance between the center of rudder-stock H and the center of rudder, it may be known that Li is the lift acting on the ic point from the leading edge of rudder, and L2 is the lift acting upon the center of rudder.
It is not found that ME is the product obtained by multiplying the lift L1 and L2 by the lever of couple
respectively, to which Mm is joined as a term related to angular acceleration.
By the above procedure, the general equation for the
moment and lifts acting upon the rudder-stock with necessary modification for the effects of angular velocity of steering is obtained.
2.3 Method for Solution of the Integral Equation to Determine the Distribution of Free Vortex
When the conditions as to the variations by time are
given for V,wi, h and a, the integral equation to determine
the distribution of free vortex k(s) is given by the
above-mentioned equation (15) , that is,
ree2 da
f
gc(Va w1) + 4 dt C S k(s)ds = 0 where 7rp 4 A 2 u a (23)Mm
128 dt2 MH = [1(da where -c(1 - 2h) Co dt 7rcVa+ nc2(--3- - h) da +
f
4 dt 0 2 / 3 ncVa+ Th.c j - h)+f
r-0
fl+s
Now, it is needed to introduce various condition for the steering of ship into the equation (24) by substitution, and it is considered approximately right to assume that the following conditions prevail directly after the steering motion:
V - Const
da -Const =J
dt
k( s ) is to be found on condition that a - 0 for t - 0,and
a is given for t >0. Assuming further that -s, the
equation (24) will be as follows:
Further, r
_f
tV dt and V ._,Const, r0 da d a and a dt dt' dt Const, a _jt a -
r ,
3 7r cj 74-7rc2 j(T - h) + is thus obtained.In order to change the above to a non-dimentional form,
the following values are introduced. Putting that
-k( )
et
X ,
c
= e
r(e)
.the equation (25) is transformed.
+ r k( )de' = 0 (25) V
-
e
k(s)ds - 0 (24) k(ei)del-
0 -t C-x
V1+ X-(X+ (1- h)}=f
i( e) de ( 26 )and the equation (26) can be rewritten as follows:
-x
± X - e
Jr
r(e)def(x)
(26')o vx - 6
however, since f(0)---- constant -A(A:constant h), it has
1 A
the solution + 211
X }
at x< 1, andr
holds singularityvx
(22)
at x-0
. Hence, assuming thatr(e)
+211-0- U(e)
(27)substitute in the equation (26),
j..x
V1+X - e
-
u(e)de g(x) 0 x e where g(x) (A + x)(ga.(x) g2(x)) - g3(x)g1(x)=(
+x - 1) 1 2e- x (28) x sin--g2(x)=(x)._f
0 V 1+ x - ex
e(x -g3( x)f
d e o 1'1+X
-by which the integral equation relating to u( is obtained.
This has no singularity even at x0, and numerical integration can be made.
It is then assumed that the following equation can be
formed for suitable interval.
eV1+x-e
eV - ef
u( e)de)f
de -=U(i-e)Fol(X) v X- e 0 V X -=-1 ,.,e \/1+ x - e
where F0
(x)
-
1 de'o - e
Accordingly, when it is to be generally written as follows, u ((m -2 me V 1-4- X C
f,
m lie de = Fmm-1(x)\-
x - eby putting e , 2e, ne, the following simultaneous
equations are given,
g(e)
u1F10(e) g( 28) - 111F ( 2e ) + u.,10( 28 )
og(ne)-uiF1(ne)+u
o 1+2 1iF2(ne)+ However, Ille \/ 1+ ne - e e Fla(ne)-
de 111-1'(m-1)e
\ine - e V(k+1)e+(k+1)2 +(k+1)e+-7--ff log k e+k2
e2 +k +12+(k+1 )
+ ( C2 -ke+
k2
e 2 where k n-As it will be seen with the equation (30), F3211 (ne) is
m-the function of n-m and e, so it is to be written as
Gn-m' and when it is required to be particularly mentioned,
it is written as Gn-m(e). In this case, the equation (29),
which are simultaneous equations become
gkne)-n-m m-1 -1
(29)
4_ un..,Fi( ne) where n _1 , 2 , ..n (30) (31)-E
-By solving these equations respectively, 11 can be found.
However, in this case, if e is assumed excessively large, the kernel of the integral equation will be infinitely large at x= e,and in the integral for the final section,
n \/1± fl - e
u(e)cie
un_L_ Go ( 32)-5(n-1)8
ne
ewhere Go
the error is feared to become excessively large. Therefore,
even when e is assumed fairly large
in
carrying out thecalculation, there will be the need of a corrective measure to minimize the interference of error, namely, supposing
u(e)
is a straight line in the section of ne->e(n-l)e,the following equation is given,
u(e )
=u* 1+x(
- L-)6n-T-3
and substituting in the equation (32) ,
IG
- 11.4eGo -
N,J* ne 1 + n.e -where, T=jr
(n, e )de
(n-l)sn-
e2e
+ 1 \/ 1 e+e - log( 2 +1 +2 e2 + 4*e
Hence, I = A. G0 - 2 ( e Got - Got1+ 2 G0 11 )) =Go 1 * A At ) u' n- gOn the other hand, by the equation (31),
n-1 g(ne)= um-,1 Gh-m I Is-.1 2 (33)
-e) ( t1.0 05 1 n-1 g(ne) -LLH G 11,1 -0 n-m 1 un_A_ u G
GI I
fl+*
n-rsIn this way, by finding Gto and u, I can be obtained
from the equations (33) and (34) with the interference of
error diminished.
In practice, assumption is made to the extent that e=1,
and calculation is carried out by the
u(e)
up to n=4.Any further calculations are made by the method of
multi-nomial expression just equal to the equation (29) by
directly using i(e). In the meantime, n=10 and onwards,
Gn-m -*
0.30
3 5 SCALE FOR Ulg ) 20
SCALE FOR dil-Lg)
30
(34)
0 10
+
the slope of
rw
becomes extremely slaw and presentsconvergence. Therefore, e is set still larger to facilitate
calculation.
For example, in case h= 0.3, that is, when the center of the rudder axis is located at the point 30% of the chord
length from the leading edge, u() and
r(e)
against e areplotted as shown in Fig.3.
2.4 Example of Numerical Calculation
By the solution of the integral equations of the
preceding paragraph, r(e), that is, k(s), or the distribution of free vortices, is found, and so it is made possible to
calculate lift and moment. In this case, in order to make
clear the non-stationary effect, the lift and moment in the stationary condition are expressed by Lo and MH0,
Lo_ mcPV2a
(35)
-h) c2 p V2a
MHO=
This Lo and MHO, as well as Ll, L2 and MH, are expressed in the non-dimentional form for the convenience of calcu-lation as follows: Lo CL _ 2 n: a o pv2 c CL1 1L - s (1-2h - A ) 2 PV c 0L2- L2 - 2 71. c2, P V2 c
cir(e)
de a wherea=
A 4
x
-V '1/(x-e) +(x--)2,
a
( 3 6 )-clvdr
MR2 - h) (CLo -1- CL1) + - h)c1,2 (37)1--PV
c-and the difference between the stationary condition and the
non-stationary condition is expressed by ACL, and LNCLAH as follows:
ACL=CLi+CL2
- h)CL1+ - h)CL2
One of the points on which the lift acts are h- 0.25,
and the other is h- 0.50. Therefore in numerical
calculation, both extremities, that is, h= 0.25 and h= 0.50
are selected, and as intermediate points, h= 0.30 and 0.40,
4 points in all, are chosen for calculation. In ordinary
ships, about h =0.27 -0.32 are selected in most cases.
Assuming that the maximum rudder angle is 35°, x at this
time is expressed by xmax,
annx aithax V
XITLaX
cj
When V and c are definite, xma, is the parameter which
is inversely proportional to the angular velocity of
steering j.
For example, in case h=0.30, and xmax =20, CL and CmH
are calculated, and plotted in the same chart as shown in
Fig.4 and Fig.5. The difference between
Clmoof
stationarycondition and Chin of non-stationary condition as shown in
Fig.5, corresponds to the increased amount of the
coefficients of moment, AC, arising from the effect of
the angular velocity of steering.
40 30 c;..1 2.0 /0 = 0.30 X max= 20 STATIONARY
NNON
STATIONARY 10 20 30 40° RUDDER ANGLE 10 20 30 40° RUDDER ANGLE Fig.0 Increment of CmH against respective rudder angle. (in case h. 0.25) 10 05 -02 A=OM 20 ;<6 Cfivi DUE TO COA CA1H DUE TO Cce
STATIONARY
NON-STATIONARY
10 20 30 40'
RUDDER ANGLE
Fig.? Increment of Givgi
against respective rudder angle. (in case 0.30) 6 Cmn 05 10 20 30 50 70 40' /0 20 30 RUDDER ANGLE Fig.5
Note:CmH of the anticlock-wise direction is noted
as positive in Fig.l. Fig.4
0.15 0 (0 0.05 20° 30° 40 - RUDDER ANGLE Fig.8 Increment of CmH against respective rudder angle. ( in case 0.40) Fig.9 Increment of CmH against respective rudder angle. (in case h= 0.50)
In order to know the effect of angular velocity of
steering on ACmH, by changing velocity in various ways,
that is, within the range of xmax
=5-70, then ACmH was
calculated against the rudder angle a at h=0.25, 0.30,
0.40 and 0.50, which results are as plotted in Fig.6--Fig.9.
In these charts, dotted lines indicate the increment of
moment due to Cu, and the full lines show the total of
increment in the case where there is an increase in moment
owing to CL1 in addition to the increase due to Cu,
namely, in the case of 0.25, there exists the increase
10 20 30 40° RUDDER AM-LE ° -rmax= m0X=20 =30 ..--Xmax =50 xinax =70 20 50 A
-due to 0L2 alone, and that due
to Cia
does not come up,as it is a matter of course. Accordingly ACmH is the
function of the angular velocity of steering alone, and even though the rudder anglea may undergo a change, LCmil
stays unchanged, as illustrated in Fig.6. Compared with
this, in the case of h- 0.30, both increases due to CIA.
and CL2 are present, of which the former is the function
of not only the angular velocity of steering but also that
of the rudder angle a. The latter has no relation to the
rudder angle just the same as in the instance of h.= 0.25,
but the sum of the former and the latter, that is, ACivai
will form a group of curves as indicated in Fig.?.
At h==0.30, the increase due to Cu is larger than that
arising from CIA_ in its amount, but at h= 0.4, the increase
due to 0L1 grows larger reversewise, and at h =0.50, the
increase
will
be only that which arises from CIA., and agroup of curves radiate from the origin.
All though Fig.6-9, it is always observed that the
smaller
xnax
is, that is, the faster the angular velocityof steering is, the greater t_scuila will come up. With a
view to making this relation clearer, the groups of curves
are cut at a-15°, and plotted AC IE along the axis of
abscissae and fl(when the rudder angle a and the advancing
velocity V are constant, the non-dimenconal value
propor-tionate to the angular velocity of steering.) along the
axis of ordinates, and AC MH at a=150 are laid down as
A = 025
Civil/ DUE TO CL2
I I 1
05 10 15
Fig.10 Effect of Angular
Velocity of Steering on the Increase of CLui
(at h =0.25)
Fig.12 Effect of Angular
Velocity of Steering on the Increase of C. (at h= 0.40) r-0 10 A =030 A.= 0.50 NEIC/414 DUE TO CH
" " CL?
.05 .10 15r
2-Fig.11 Effect of Angular
Velocity of Steering on the Increase of CLEI.
(at h =0.30)
CMH DUE TO CL1
.05 .10 .15
cvd:.
Fig.13 Effect of Angular
Velocity of Steering on the Increase of Old'. (at h 0.50) /5 .10 005 0/0 a 110 . ,05 DUE DUE C 0
According to these charts, the increase due to 0L2 is perfectly proportionate to the increase of the angular velocity of steering as in the case of h= 0.2,5 in Fig. 10,
and such increase grows in a straight line. On the
contrary, the amount of increase due to 'CIA. does not draw a straight line, but, as indicated in Fig.13, shows a tendency of gradually approaching the extremity value.
On the other hand, in order to clarity the effect of the change in the position of the rudder axis on the amount of
increase in the coefficient of moment, the rudder axis
chord ratio h is plotted as the ordinates, and ACNE ata
are laid down with
n
as the parameter, and thus Fig.14 isobtained. Since the
n
is 0.02-0.03 at the time of steeringin ordinary ships, it tan clearly be observed that the larger the h-value is, that is, the farther backward the rudder-stock is located, the greater the LCmH value will
be, within the above range of 2.
15
w
6 D5
02
Fig.14 Effect of the Position of
Rudder Axis on the Increase of C.
Summarizing various points discussed above, the following conclusion will be reached.
Within the above extent of calculation, the twisting
moment acting upon the rudder-stock becomes creater by the
effect of the angular velocity of steering as compared with that in the stationary condition.
In this case, the lift acting upon the rudder may be
divided into two. The one acts upon the point at the
chord length from the leading edge of the rudder, and the
other acts upon the center of the rudder.
The lift acting upon the point at 37.- the chord length
is the function of both angular velocity of steering and the
rudder angle, but the lift acting upon the point at the
chord length is the function of the angular velocity of
steering alone.
The twisting moment acting upon the rudder-stock
increases by the effect of the angular velocity of steering,
but the nature and status of increase greatly differ
depending upon the position of the center of the rudder.
Within the range of the angular velocity of steering in
ordinary ships, and 'when the position of the center of the
rudder-stock is located within the scope -1- the chord
length, this increase grows larger as the position of the
rudder center shifts farther from the leading edge rearwards.
3. EXPERIMENTS ON MODELS 3.1 Experimental Apparatus and Method
In the preceding chapter, various conclusions were led from the results of theoretical calculations in relation to
the effect of angular velocity of steering on the twisting
moment of the rudder-stock. For the main object of making
comparison of these results with that of experiments, the present experiments on models were conducted.
This series of experiments on rudder models were carried out by use of the circulating channel constructed in the
compound of the Technical Research Laboratory of the Hitachi
Shipbuilding and Engineering Co., Ltd. This circulating
channel was completed in the 1956 spring for the purpose of experimenting on ships, propellers and other hydrodynamic subject matters, being 11.500m in length, 3.400m in width
and 1.200m in depth. As a circulating channel, this ranks
among the largest as well as best in Japan. Its general
arrangement is briefly as illustrated in Fig.15. The water
in the channel is actuated by a -bladed propeller with a
diameter of lm driven by 15HP 3-phase A.C. Comutator Motor.
The water is thus made to circulate in the horizontal
direction at the rate of 0.6-1.8 m/s. There is free
surface at the measuring section alone. All other parts
form a closed tunnel. The measuring section is provided
with windows for observation of water on the side in the
frontal part and at the bottom. The distribution of the
indicated that the degree of irregularity was within 5% except the zone in the close vicinity of the side walls and
the bottom. The ripples on the free surface were also
insignificant, and particularly low at the time of a slow speed. Thus it had been proved that the channel was
sufficiently eligible for utilization in hydrodynamic experiments.
PLAN
ELEVATION
11500
Fig.15 General Arrangement of the Water Circulating Channel.
(31) -1 EE 1 li i----P 1 0
0
N --, k 4 II 1 II II '; 1. I o o v-,-I
,
0
0_
VV a e ! , 1 , 1 o o,
-1 ! ! ;
IiI
IIn order to measure the forces and moments acting upon the rudder, a rudder dynamometer as illustrated in Fig.16
was designed and prepared. This dynamometer was planned to
measure the three factors, that is, the moment about the rudder-stock(MH), the force acting perpendicular to the
chord of rudder, that is, normal force N, and the force acting in the same direction as the chord (Tangential
force: T) in continuation not only in a stationary condition but even in a non-stationary condition during the process of steering.
In measuring the above mentioned three factors, hollow
steel tube with a thin wall thickness, in which a electric
wire strain-guage was pasted, was inserted into a part of
the rudder-stock, so as to transduce the mechanical unit
into electric units. The details of these mechanisms are
as shown in Fig.16. The rudder-stock was held in a vertical
position by a pair of bearings at the point higher than the
hollow steel tube, and was connected with the rudder at the
lower end, while the upper end with the worm and the rudder
angle indicator, and the variohm for recording the rudder
angle. A 1/32HP commutator motor was utilized as the
driving motor for steering, and the two-step reduction system including the worm and worm-gear was so designed that the rudder-stock would be turned round at a proper
velocity. Fig.17 is a photograph to illustrate the
condition in which the aforementioned dynamometer was
rudder angle was available by the indicator moving around the dial having the angle graduations, and also by an
electric bridge formed by the variohm directly coupled with the rudder-stock, which converted the changes in the rudder-angle into the changes of electric resistance, so that continuous measuring could be made by use of an oscillograph.
HELM ANGLE INDICATOR
11,,.11=1: .
III.
Agit*
milwropmnimmin
=IF
iktPMOTOR FOR STEERING
IT/ N OF THE
PASTED STRAIN_CAUGE
CUT WATER
RUDDER
The unbalanced voltage induced by the electric wire
strain guage were also amplified and rectified respectively
and led to the oscillograph. Fig.18 shows the amplifier,
oscillator, for the electric wire strain guage, bridge-box, magnetic oscillograph, as installed near the circulating
channel. Besides, before and after experiments, force and
moment were applied to the rudder-stock by means of the weight hung through a pulley, and by changing the amount of weight, calibration was made so as to confirm the accuracy
of measuring apparatus for conducting experiments.
Fig.17 General View of the Rudder Dynamometer.
Fig.18 Arrangement of the Experimental Apparatus.
3.2 On the Non-dimensional Expression of Forces Acting upon the Rudder
The forces acting upon the rudder are generally like
those shown in Fig.19. When the resultant force acting on
the rudder placed in the water at the rudder angle of a is is denoted by P, and the distance from the leading edge to the point acted upon by f, the component at perpendicular to the chord of the rudder is the normal force N, and
another component along the chord is the tangential force T.
This resultant force P may be considered dividing it into a component acting at perpendicular to the flow, and another
acting in the direction of the flow. In this case, the
former is the lift L and the latter is expressed by the drag D. As previously stated, in this experiment, the
normal force N, the tangential force T, and the moment
about the center of the rudder-stock MN alone were measured. So other factors were required to be computed from the data
5
The non-dimen,tional notation of these forces were made in
accordance with general method as follows:
obtained by what were actually measured. the following equations are cited:
For the purpose,
p
\i N2 4_T2 -
\I L2 4. D2 (40) L= N cosa - T sina (41) D = N sina+ T cosa (42) ME hC + (43)-Resultant force coefficient
Normal force coefficient
CN-P V2A
Tangential force coefficient CT=
Lift coefficient
Drag coefficient
Moment coefficient
same manner as follows:
I 2 = 2 2 CP= \I GIT ± / CT CL CD CL- CNcos - CTsin a CD- CNsin a ÷ CTcos a C h CN CD= P V2A PV2A PV2A PV2 A 2 o vI P V2 AC (44) (45)
where V: Velocity of the flow (Ws),
kg 82 p: Density of water
in
A: Area of the rudder (m.2)
The equations between one another coefficients are in the
L
=
+
-Fig.19 The Forces acting upon the Rudder,
3.3 Law of Similitude and Effect of Scale
To presume the performance of the full size rudder on the basis of the experimental results on models, it is, needless to say, necessary to satisfy the law ocVsimilitude
between the model and the full size. It Is generally known
that when the phenomena relate to inertia force, it needs to follow Newton's law of similitude; in the case of
phenomena relating to gravity, Fronde's law, and the
phenomena governed by viscous force of the medium, Reynolds'
law. Since the present experiments on models aim at
surveying the effect of the angular velocity of steering on the twisting moment of the rudder-stock, it suffices to make comparison between the values as measured in a stationary condition and those in a condition where the dynamic effects of the non-stationary condition have joined, and there may be no necessity for law of similitude in the strict sense. However, the results of the present series of experiments
will be brought into comparison or referred to in the contemplated various experiments hereafter to be carried out, or it may be necessitated to make assumption as to the condition of actual vessels on the basis of the results of the present experiments, it was decided to make investi-gation into law of similitude at the start of this series of experiments.
Suppose the rudder is in an open condition where it is completely submerged deep into the water and there is
assumed no wave on the surface. Then there will not be
involved anything related to gravity, and instead it needs to consider about both inertia force and viscous force of
the medium. Even when these two forces are acting, it is
sufficient to follow Reynolds' law as introduced by the
general principle od dynamic similitude(23). In order to
perfectly satisfy Reynolds' law of similitude when the
model is
4-
of the full size, and the same kind of fluid asin the case of the full size is used, the experiments on model must be conducted under the velocity a times the full
size, which makes it unsuitable for the practice of
experiment. Accordingly this law is usually ignored, and
experiments are made with a velocity as fast as possible,
and on a model as large as possible. This gives rise to
the problem of the scale effect, and lays down the condition
relating to Reynolds' number for the contemplated experiments
on models so as to be able to precisely estimate the
(23)
publicly announced in 1939 that Reynolds' number was
required to be
1.5x
106 at the minimum in order to obtaina satisfactory agreement in every case. Later in 1948,
Dr. van Lammeren(8) stated that for a rudder of ordinary shape, a reliable results can be obtained even at a
Reynolds' number of around 0.20x 106, basing upon his tank experiments on open rudders for Reynolds' numbers ranging
from 1.66x
106-0.05x
106. In the present experiments,prior to various experiments on models, tests were conducted
with geometrically similar models in two sizes so as to
ascertain the scale effects which might arise in the
circulating channel. The shape and size of the model
rudders used were as shown in Fig.20 (Model No.1), and another one which was similar in its shape to Model No.1
but twice as large in its size (termed Model No.2). Fig.21
is the photograph showing these two models. As to the
rudder section, N.A.C.A.0018 was selected in the sense that
it is equal in the thickness-chord ratio to those commonly
used among ordinary ships, having a symmetrical section, and its characteristics are already known.
The exioeriments were conducted with Model Nos.1 and 2, in which the rudders were held in a condition that the
upper end was submerged under water for one-half its height. Besides, with a view to preventing the rudder-stock from disturbing the water surface by making waves, or causing air-draw, a cutwater with an ordival section was prepared, and made the rudder-stock pass through the inside of the
2/6
NUMERALS:IN Myi.
Fig.20 Rudder No.1 as
tested in the
circulating channel.
Fig.21 Similar Model of Rudder.
Note:Models No.1 and No.2 are arranged from the right to the left.
cutwater, so that the force acting on the cutwater would
not be transmitted to the rudder-stock. Thus efforts were
made to satisfy the condition that on the assumed water surface, no wave is considered to be raised.
With Model No.1, experiments were conducted by changing the velocity of the flow in three ways, and with Model No.2,
in two ways. The experimental results were as shown in
Fig.22 and 23, where the rudder angle a is plotted along the
ordinates and CN, Cp, and E/C values were laid down. The
comparison between the two Figures affirms the agreement in
the tangent of the coefficient of normal force ((qT'') the
stall angle, etc., with an exception of part of t/C, and there was not noticed any substantial difference between
the two. Although slight difference was seen with the
maximum normal force coefficient, etc., this was due to the
appearing even when Reynolds' number is as large as 5.5 x
106. Therefore, this may be considered not to relate to
the difference in Reynolds? number. Beyond the critical
angle which causes a stall, the phenomenon became unstable
with differences arising in 0N, however this is inevitable
since it is a matter of natural cause. Table 1 shows the
Reynolds' number at the time of experiments. It must be
noticed that they cover a range of 0.085 x106
0.22x 106.
As above-mentioned, the maximum Reynolds' number at the time of experiment was over 0.2 x106 as advocated by Dr. van Lammeren, and the minimum number is so small as one
place lower than the aforementioned. Yet these results
showed a good agreement. The principal reason why these
experimental results gave reasonable values for important items such as the slope of normal force, the coefficients of maximum normal force, and the rudder angle at which the stall occured as compared with other experimental results (to be described in detail later), is that in the present experiment, a circulating channel was used, which condition was quite different from other cases of experiments.
Namely, an experiment by use of a circulating channel differs from an ordinary towing tank experiment with the model advancing through the stationary water, in that the water itself is activated into circulation by means of the
impeller, and the water flaw had come to include its own
inherent turbulence. By this reason, the so-called
when a turbulence stimulation grating
(24)
is inserted, a larger Reynolds' number was brought into action in the present experiments as compared with ordinary towing tankexperiment, and diminished the portion of laminar flow in
the proximity of the leading edge of the rudder, and in spite that the apparent Reynolds' number was below 0.2x 106, the experimental results showed agreement as good as
any experiments conducted at a larger Reynolds' number.
RUDDER Ng I RUDDER AL? 2
v =0 62 m/s
--- V
064m/s , 0.85 0.93 1.04 /0 10
20 30° 10 20 30°RUDDER ANdLE RUDDER ANGLE
Fig.22 Results of Rudder Fig.23 Results of Rudder
Model No.l. Model No.2.
In this way, it had been affirmed that reasonable values
could be obtained even at an apparent Reynolds number of
around
0.1x
106 in experiments by use of circulatingchannel. Accordingly, in the experiments hereafter to be
-conducted, the model rudder having a height of 200mm, and
a chord length of 120mra, and the velocity of flow of about
1 m/s or below which raises but least ripples on the free
surface, were decided to be used, except special instances,
with due consideration on the convenience of experiments and, also on the fact that the propeller model to be used on the occasion of the experiments on the rudder fitted behind the propeller, Was 200mm in diameter, about which descri'ption will be made in Report 2 of the present series of experiments.
3.4 Experimental Results, and Comparison with the Results
of Theoretical Calculations
To facilitate the comparison with the results of
theoretical calculations as carried out in the preceding Chapter, the experitent was made with the instances where
the center of rudder-stock was located at tile points 25%,.
30% and 50% of the chord length from the leading edge, and
!Rudder Dimensions of Rudder
(Height ChordxThickness -4* I Velocity of Water Flow Reynolds' Number 0,82 0.085 X 10 'No.1 200
x 120 x 21.6,
.0.85
0.117 x 106
0.143. x 106' 0.64.
, 0.153 x; 10 No.,2 400x 240 x 43.2
0.93 0,..,221 x106
---Table 1 Reynolds' Number at the time of Experiment
for the instances in which the rudder was at the stationary rudder angle and also in the non-stationary condition in
the process of steering. In case of the stationary rudder
angle, 0-350 of both port and starboard sides were
measured at an interval of 5°. As to the non-stationary
condition in the course of steering, expstriments were mnde by changing the maximum rudder angles in a number of ways, and at 3 different kinds of steering speeds for both port and starboard sides.
Figs.24, 22 (previously shown), and 25 illustrate the results of experiments in the form of coefficients, as used
in the case of the equation (44), for the instances of
0.25, 0.30 and 0.50, plotting the rudder angle along the
axis of abscissa. The dimension of rudder model used at
the experiments were 200mmx 120rimx 21.6mm, height >< chord
length x thickness, respectively. As they are given as CN,
CD, E/C, they should have shown the same values regardless
of the h value, but owing to the finish given to the model
surface, particularly the roughness of the surface near the
leading edge, it influenced sensitively upon the critical
angle for stalling or the coefficient of maximum normal
force at the time of experiment, and some slight differences
were noticed in these respects, which are all due to the
effect of inequality of the three models. However, so far
dCN
as the slope of the coefficients of noimal force da , and
was observed. Besides, at the rudder angle beyond the critical angle for stalling some deviations were noticed, because the phenomenon was unstable as alredy explained. This is, however, thought inevitable under the present condition.
As expressed in the form of the coefficient of the moment about the center of rudder-stock CmH, these
experi-mental results will be as shown in Fig.26 In this case,
the effect of the location of the center of the rudder stock is clearly observed as it should be so.
1.0 8 6
z
A= 0.25 v = 0.5 9 in/s , 0.76 -0.99 20 30° RUDDER ANGLE 1.0 -8 2 A = 0.50 0.63 m/s , [04 -10 20 30° RUDDER ANGLEFig.24 Results of rudder Fig.25 Results of rudder
test for the case of test for the case of
.05
05
10
20 30' RUDDER ANGLE
Fig.26 Moment coefficient
curves at stationary and non-stationary condition
Fig.27 An example of the oscillogram 20 - STATIONARY I --- NON-STATIONARY! 15 i -0.25 =1.5
-Regarding the Threes acting upon the rudder- in a
non-stationary condition while in the course of steering motion,
Fig.27 shows an example as measured by oscillograph.
By analyzing such an oscillogram, the coefficient of
moment Cial is found against the rudder angle just in the
same manner as in the case of the stationary condition.
Tig.26 gives a typical example of such analytical results
for instances of h==0.25, 0.30 and 0.50. These curves
Indicate greater values of the coefficients of moment as compared with the instances of stationary condition owing
to the effects of angular velocity of steering, Generally, .
in such a non-stationary condition, thefl critical angle
'where stalling occurs, usually lags by 5° 8° to be about
27'30° by the effect of the angular velocity of steering, as compared with the critical angle for the stationary
condition which is about 21.50 This is thought to be the
reason why this effect was observed with the coefficient of
moment for the rudder angle of over 25° in the, instance of
h==0,50, as appearing in Fig,26, whereas the Civil'. in the :non
stationary condition was given a smaller value than that in the stationary condition.
The ONE values in the nonstationary condition thus
measured was brought into comparison with the Cll values
obtained at the stationary rudder angle, so as to find
AC, thereby to make
comparison with the results ofcalculations. However, in the theoretical calculation, the
calculated on the assumption that it keeps on increasing
until the maximum angle of 350 Therefore, it was necessary
to select a rudder angle below the stalling angle in making comparison with the results of experiments on models.
Accordingly, it was decided to make comparison in the difference of the coefficients of moment at the rudder
angle of 15°. Thus AC
IE
in the case of Fig.26 was foundto be 0.016 at h=0.25, 0.034 at h=0.30, and 0.062 at h= 0.50. The ACIvill values calculated in this manner, were
also led from other results of measuring, and were laid
down with the non-dimensional values
a
along the axis ofabscissae, obtaining Figs.28 30 for respective h values. For the sake of convenience in making comparison, the curve based on the results of theoretical calculations which were previously shown in Figs-10-13, is put down concurrently.
Since the conditions at the time of experiments do not
fully satisfy the assumed conditions for calculations, that
is, the condition that the angular velocity of steering is
to be constant, was not perfectly fulfilled, or the
calcu-lation was made on the two dimensional basis, or due to
other measuring error, the experimental results showed
deviations, and cannot be said to be quantitatively in
agreement with the results of calculations, yet they can be
considered to be close to the results of calculations in
their general tendency.
In Paragraph 3.3, under the title of "Law of Similitude", it was mentioned that the experiments were made on the
assumption that the rudder submerged deep in the water, and there was no wave on the water surface, whereby the effect
of gravity may well be neglected. In order to satisfy this
condition and to prevent the air draw as induced by the rudder-stock, the cutwater was provided around the water surface. This was also considered to be a kind of aerofoil,
and so it was feared to give rise to interference with the
body of the rudder. Thus it was thought important to make
this point reaffirmed. So by changing the length of the
rudder-stock so as to give 5 different depths down to the top of the rudder, a series of experiment were carried out. The result was that in the case of Model No.1 the changes in the water-depth down to the top of the rudder within the range of 6-15cm, would have no effect on the performance
of the rudder. Therefore, it should be added that this
series of experiments were decided to be carried out under
the condition that - the height of the rudder was submerged
in the water.
3.5 Other Effects on the Performance of the Rudder
The above finishes up the discussion in connection with the comparison between the theoretical calculations and the
results of experiments on the effect of angular velocity of
steering on the performance of the rudder. In order to
examine the propriety of the experimental results as viewed from other phases, let us deal with the effects of other
06
ci .02
01
.02 .03 .04 .05 .06 to,
=
9 c
S-KtmL,C.Fig.28 Experimental results
of Cjv compared with
theoretical ones.
(for the case of hr=0.25)
..0/ = 0.25 .01 02 03 04 05 06 Cd. Si= Fig.30 Experimental results of ,f_ CLE compared with theoretical ones.
(for the case of h =0.50)
01 .02 03 .04 05 .06
Fig.29 Experimental results
of LC compared with
theoretical ones.
(for the case of h 0.30)
Fig.31 Rudder models for
5 different draft. A-050 /0 08 1. 06 z 04 02 c5)
making comparative study on the results of other experiments. Among many factors acting upon the performance of the
rudder in the case of open rudder, the principal ones are summarized to be the under-mentioned four items:
The effects of aspect-ratio. The effects of rudder section. The effects of rudder outline. The effects of Reynolds' number.
Of the above 4 items, (4)Reynolds' number has already been dealt with under the title of "Law of Similitude", henceforth, other three item will be discussed below.
(1) The effects of Aspect-ratio
When the dimension of the rudder is reduced more in the direction of the height, the stream which flows into the back of the rudder from the upper and lower edges gradually grows larger in proportion, and the force generated by
negative pressure acting on the back of the rudder, that is,
the lift (Normnl force), is reduced for the same rudder
angle. Namely, the smaller the aspect-ratio (in the case
of rudder, the height/chord length ratio) is, the more the lift will diminish, and accordingly the critical angle for
stalling will lag and grow larger. In order to generalize
the effect of aspect-ratio, the following relative formula is led from Prandtl's theory of aerofoil.
eLb CLa 2 CL Ab Aa CD1) = CDa+ 2r ( hb2 ha2 ) CL Ab Aa ab= aa +
573
7-,T ( ) nb nawhere A: Area of the rudder
h: Dimension of the rudder of the direction of height
a: Rudder angle
The attached letters "a" and "b" signify the "rudder a" and the "rudder b" respectively.
This relative equation was confirmed, to agree compara-tively well with the results of experiments when the
circulation round the aerofoil is making elliptical
distri-bution(25). Basing upon this equation, Glauert, Betz, and
others introduced corrective coefficients r and
a,
andassuming them as the function of aspect-ratio x, gave the induced angle otand induced drag CDL as the corrective
(46)
As Wieselsberger(25) stated, these equations cannot be
applied to a wide range of aspect-ratio , and the
coeffi-cient of maximum lift remains unchanged irrespective of
of aspect-ratio. Thus they cannot be said to be perfect,
terms against the rudder of infinite height.
r
77- X CL ( 47 ) + a 2 Cpi= n7x 0L -+ 4but even then they express such effects quite well.
Mr. Fisher(27) published in the "Werft, Reederei Hafen' the result of the application of the equation (46) to the
experimental results obtained at nttingen(26). This has
recently been referred to by Mr. Jaeger(28). Therefore, it
is again mentioned in Fig.32 for the sake of reference. It
may be observed that as the aspect-ratio gets smaller, CL becomes smaller for the same rudder angle, while the
critical angle for stalling grows more larger. The rudder
on which the author experimented had an aspect-ratio of 1.67, and it is laid down in dotted line in the same chart. It can now be noticed that the coefficient of maximum lift does not correspond by various reasons aforementioned, but the shape of lift is found to position about the half-way between those for the aspect-ratios of 2 and 1.33, which is
considered to be a reasonable result.
Next, among other experimental results, of which the coefficients of normal force Cm and the position of the center of pressure were given, and having about the same values of aspect-ratio as the present experiment, were selected and correctively plotted in a chart for the sake of comparison with the present experimental result as per
Fig.33. The chart includes the result of experiment
conducted at the water tank in Washington with symmetrical hydrofoil having an aspect-ratio of 1.0(23), the experi-tal result obtained by Dr. Akazaki with a model having an
. J00 t 12 080 og 0.3 .97 - .20 , RUDDER ANGLE 30' AspECT RATIO THIS EXPERIMENT 167 NACA 167(CORRECTEp WAGEN,N6EN 200 A C.A ISO WASHINGTON' 400 Dr.AKAZAKI, 4 1. 0.0
Fig.32 Effect of aspect-ratio of rudder
on CL according to Mr. Fi er.
r
Fig.33 Results of comparison with. other
r
: experiments: z . :,
Kfi,c 1
,
111
litrjri
irr irVPI/TAr
414
II(
11
"A '
All/Prfr4V1*-
41°
Ail
/
or
i 1 ,M.
le"
RESUL TOT THE AUTHOR'S(ASPEC7;RATIO=167) J _ ASPECT RATIO 5 -7 - ° 133 -.20° 25° 30' 43 40* --- RUDDER ANGLE 060 10.40 020 08 067 /0° /5°
by Cowley, Simmons and Coales at the Advisary Committee for Aeronautics with plate rudder(29), and the test results that Dr. Van Lammeren obtained with a model of aspect-ratio
2.0 at the towing tank of Wagenigen(3), and that of the
experiments on N.A.C.A.0018, having the aspect-ratio of 6, the same aerofoil as used in the present experiment, which was corrected to the aspect-ratio of 1.67 by the equation
(47). According to those data, although the result of the
present experiments somewhat differs from that of N.A.C.A. as corrected, it is considered to give reasonable values as compared with other results so far as the coefficient of maximum lift and the critical angle causing stall are
concerned, when it is taken into consideration that the aspect-ratio used was 1.67.
(2) On the Effect of Rudder Section (Thickness-Chord Ratio)
A marked advancement has been witnessed in the field of studies principally on aircraft wings by experimenting their performances through comparisons between aerofoils
having different sections. Many such experiments were msde
by the wind tunnels at Gbttingen, N.A.C.A., and others. However, the aerofoils used in these experiments are mostly
unsymmetrical, and data on symmetrical sections which can
be used for ordinary rudders are limited to a small portion thereof.
The section generally used for rudders, with expection of special cases, are nowadays those of aerofoil types
having symmetrical sections, hence we will principally deal
on such rudder sections. As indicated by the results of
experiments on a series of symmetrical aerofoils (7 kinds from aerofoil 0006 to 0025) as carried out by N.A.C.A., the
slope of lift does not change even though the thickness/ chord length ratio varies within a range of 0.06-0.25, but the coefficient of maximum lift and the stalling angle
undergo changes as illustrated in Table 2.
This result suggests that the most desirable thickness/
chord length ratio is found within the range of 12-18%.
In this case, CD does not change up to the rudder angle of
about 300, even when the thickness/chord length ratio may
change far about 0.12-0.25. Among the Flugel's
experi-mental results obtained with different rudder sections,
those which have possibility for practical use as ordinary
ship's rudder, are cited in Fig.34. As illustrated by the
results II, III and IV of Fig.34, when the Joukowski's
symmetrical aerofoil is used, there will be no particular
change in the rudder performance even when the thickness/
chord length ratio may change within the range of
0.16
0.25. On the other hand, the plate rudder I which was used
in the past, and the rudder V of an existing ship with
which almost no consideration was given as to its section
RUDDER I RUDDER 5-7V (.70UKOWCKI PROFILE) RUDDER
240
--06 10 02 5° /0 /5 20° 2 RUDDER ANGLEFig.34 Results of experiment according to Mr. Flagel.
Table 2, Experimental Data of N.A.C.A. Symmetrical Aerofoil. 0 30 /C 20
4
iimaly Eprr,
Am.
IllFr
IPA
//
, damp,
P
47 Thickness/Chord Length Ratio Coefficient of Maximum Lift (GLmax) Stall Angle (Degree) 0.06 0.88 16.0 0.09 1.28 18.0 0.12 1.54 22.5 0.15 1.52 22.5 0.18 1.50 22.5 0.21 1.38 22.5 0.25 1.20 20.0 V I 30°(3) Effects of Rudder Outline
Generally speaking, The effect of rudder outline may be
said insignificant. Putting aside the R.W.L.Gawn's(9)
results of experiments on special forms of rudders used for warships, according to the results of experiments conducted
by R.C.Darnell(31) on rudders by changing the rudder
out-lines within the range of availability for ordinary ships, there is observed almost no effect in this respect.
Accordingly, for ordinary merchant ships, this effect will not be needed to be considered, so far as an ordinary type
of rudder is used.
4. CONCLUSION
Of various factors acting upon the rudder performance, principally the effect of angular velocity of steering has been discussed from both viewpoints of theoretical
calcu-lations and results of experiments on models, and could make their physical properties clearer.
It is contemplated to conduct further study on various problems such as quantitative estimation of the twisting moment acting upon the rudder-stock with due modification
for the effect of the propeller, which is considered
essential for ship-building technicians.
In conclusion, the author wishes to acknowledge the guidance and encouragement rendered by Dr. M. Kinoshita, ever since the construction of the circulating channel, and
also for cooperation of Mr.M. Takagi, who participated in