• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

The immunity of high state officials in relation to their individual responsibility in international criminal law - Bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The immunity of high state officials in relation to their individual responsibility in international criminal law - Bibliography"

Copied!
7
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

B i b l i o g r a p h y

Lega l do cu men ts

United Na tions Docu men ts

1. United Nations Charter of the United Nations, 1 UNTS XVI, 26 June 1945;

2. United Nations Charter of the International Military Tribunal - Annex to the Agreement

for the prosecution and punishment of the major war criminals of the European Axis (London Agreement), 82 U.N.T.S. 280, London, 8 August 1945;

3. United Nations Charter of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, TIAS. No. 1589, 4 Bevans 20, Tokyo, 19 January 1946, amended 25 April 1946;

4. The International Law Commission Principles of International Law recognized in the

Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, with commentaries, Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1950, vol. II.

5. United Nations Convention of the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 78 U.N.T.S. 277, Paris, 12 January 1951;

6. United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading

Treatment or Punishment, 1465 U.N.T.S. 85, New York, 10 December 1984;

7. International Law Commission Report of the Commission to the General Assembly on

the Work of its Forty-third Session, II-2 YILC 18, U.N. Doc.

A/CN.4/SER.A/1991/Add.1 (Part 2), 1991.

8. United Nations Security Council Resolution 827 (1993), S/RES/827 (1993), 25 May 1993;

9. United Nations Security Council Resolution 955 (1994), S/RES/955 (1994), 8 November 1994;

10.United Nations Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, UN Doc. A/CONF. 183/9, 37 ILM 1002 (1998), 2187 UNTS 90, 17 July 1998;

11.United Nations Security Council Resolution 1315 (2000), S/RES/1315 (2000), 14 August 2000;

12.The Institute of International Law Immunities from Jurisdiction and Execution of Heads

of State and of Government in International Law, 26 August 2001;

13.United Nations General Assembly Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and

(2)

14.United Nations Security Council Resolution 1593 (2005), S/RES/1593 (2005), 31 March 2005;

15.The Institute of International Law Universal criminal jurisdiction with regard to the

crime of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, 26 August 2005;

16.United Nations Depositary Notification. Sudan: Notification, C.N.612.2008. TREATIES-6, 27 August 2008;

17.United Nations, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Rules of Procedure and

Evidence, 9 February 2010;

18.United Nations, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Rules

of Procedure and Evidence, IT/32/Rev. 45, 8 December 2010;

19.United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 (2011), S/RES/1970 (2011), 26 February 2011.

Other

1. Parliament of England State Immunity Act, Chapter 33, 20 July 1978;

2. The Council of the European Union Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002

on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States,

2002/584/JHA, Official Journal L 190, 18 July 2002;

3. Assembly of States Parties Rules of Procedure and Evidence, ICC-ASP/1/3 (Part.II-A), 3-10 September 2002;

4. Assembly of the State Parties Elements of Crimes, ICC-ASP/1/3, 9 September 2002; 5. The Review Conference Resolution RC/Res.6, The Crime of Aggression, RC/Res.06,

11 June 2010;

Cas es

1. Judgment of 1 October 1946, in The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings

of the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany, the International

Military Tribunal, Part 22, KZ1176.G67 1947 at Classified Stacks, 22 August – 1 October 1946

2. Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadič a/k/a “Dule”, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal

Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, case no. IT-94-1-AR72, 2 October 1995;

(3)

International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, case no. IT-95-14-AR108bis, 29 October 1997;

4. R. v. Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate and Others, Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No. 3), [1999] 2 W.L.R. 827, [2000] 1 A.C. 147, 24 March 1999;

5. The Prosecutor of the Tribunal against Slobodan Milošević et al., Indictment, case no.

IT-99-37, 22 May 1999;

6. Democratic Republic of Congo v. Belgium, Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000, Judgement

of the International Court of Justice, ICJ Reports 2002, 14 February 2002;

7. Prosecutor against Charles G. Taylor, Decision on immunity from jurisdiction, Appeals

Chamber of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, case no. SCSL-2003-01-I, 31 May 2004; 8. Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro, Application of the Convention

on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Judgement of the

International Court of Justice, 26 February 2007;

9. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Decision on the Accused’s Second Motion for Inspection and Disclosure: Immunity Issue, Trial Chamber of the International Criminal

Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, case no. IT-95-5/18-PT, 17 December 2008;

10.The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, Warrant of Arrest for Omar Hassan

Ahmad Al Bashir, Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court, case no.

ICC-02/05-01/09, 4 March 2009;

11.The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, Second Warrant of Arrest for Omar

Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court, case

no.: ICC-02/05-01/09, 12 July 2010;

12.Situation in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. Prosecutor’s Application Pursuant to Article 58 as to Muammar Mohammed Abu Minyar Gaddafi, Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi and Abdullah Al-Senussi, Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court, case no.

ICC-01/11, 16 May 2011.

Books

1. Aust Anthony, Handbook of International Law, Oxford University Press, New York 2005;

2. Bing Bing Jia, The International Criminal Court and Third States in The Oxford

Companion to International Criminal Justice by Antonio Cassese (edit.), Oxford

(4)

3. Cassese Antonio, International Criminal Law, Second edition, Oxford University Press Inc., New York 2008;

4. Cryer Robert, Friman Håkan, Robinson Darryl, Wilmshurst Elizabeth, An Introduction

to International Criminal Law and Procedure, Oxford University Press Inc., New York

2007;

5. Czapliński Władysław, Wyrozumska Anna, Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne.

Zagadnienia systemowe, wyd. 2, C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2004;

6. Fox Hazel, The Law of State Immunity, Oxford University Press Inc., New York 2002; 7. Gaeta Paola, Official Capacity and Immunities in The Rome Statute of The International

Criminal Court – A Commentary by Cassese Antonio, Gaeta Paola and Jones John

(edit.), vol. 1, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2002

8. Higgins Rosalyn, Themes and Theories. Selected Essays, Speeches and Writings

in International Law, vol. 1, Oxford University Press, New York 2009;

9. Nsereko Daniel, Cooperation with the Court on Matters of Arrest and Surrender

of Indicted Fugitives: Lessons from the Ad Hoc Tribunals and National Jurisdictions

in The Legal Regime of International Criminal Court. Essays in Honour of Professor

Igor Blishchenko by Doria Jose, Gasser Hans-Peter, Bassiouni Mahmoud Cherif (edit.),

Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden 2009;

10.Orakhelashvili Alexander, Peremptory Norms in International Law, Oxford University Press, New York 2008;

11.Paust Jordan J., Scharf Michael, Gurulé Jimmy, Sadat Leila, Zagaris Bruce, Williams Sharon A., International Criminal Law. Cases and Materials, Second edition, Carolina Academic Press, Durham 2000;

12.Schabas William A., Oxford Commentaries on International Law. The International

Criminal Court. A Commentary on the Rome Statute, Oxford University Press, New

York 2010;

13.Shaw Malcolm N., International Law, 5th ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003;

14. Shraga Daphne, Politics and Justice: The Role of the Security Council in The Oxford

Companion to International Criminal Justice by A. Cassese (edit.), Oxford University

Press, New York 2009;

15.Sluiter Göran, Cooperation of States with International Criminal Tribunals in The

(5)

16.Van Alebeek Rosanne, The Immunity of States and their Officials in International

Criminal Law and International Human Rights Law, Oxford University Press Inc., New

York 2008.

Journ al Arti cl es

1. Akande Dapo, International Law Immunities and the International Criminal Court, 2004, 98 American Journal of International Law 2004;

2. Akande Dapo, The jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over nationals

of non-parties: legal basis and limits, 1(3) Journal of International Criminal Justice

2003;

3. Akande Dapo, The legal nature of Security Council referrals to the ICC and its impact

on Al Bashir’s immunities, 7(2) Journal of International Criminal Justice 2009;

4. Aksar Yusuf, The UN Security Council and the enforcement of individual criminal

responsibility: the Darfur case, 14(1) African Journal of International and Comparative

Law 2006;

5. Bantekas Ilias, Head of state immunity in the light of multiple legal regimes and non-self

contained system theories: theoretical analysis of ICC third party jurisdiction against the background of the 2003 Iraq war, 10(1) Journal of Conflict & Security Law 2005;

6. Boas Gideon, Moving on from Milosevic, 75 European Lawyer 2008;

7. Boister Neil, Burchill Richard, The Pinochet precedent: don’t leave home without it, 10(4) Criminal Law Forum 1999;

8. Boister Neil, Case comment: The ICJ in the Belgian Arrest Warrant case: arresting the

development of international criminal law, 7(2) Journal of Conflict & Security Law

2002;

9. Brockman-Hawe Benjamin, Case comment : International Criminal Tribunal for the

former Yugoslavia : decision on the accused’s second motion for inspection and disclosure – immunity issue – Trial Chamber decision of 17 December 2008, 58(3)

International & Comparative Law Quarterly 2009;

10.Cassese Antonio, When may senior state officials be tried for international crimes?

Some comments on the Congo v. Belgium case, 13 (4) European Journal of International

Law 2002;

11.Frulli Micaela, The question of Charles Taylor’s immunity: still in search of a balanced

(6)

12.Gaeta Paola, Does President Al Bashir enjoy immunity from arrest?, 7(2) Journal of International Criminal Justice 2009;

13.Gosnell Christopher, The request for an arrest warrant in Al Bashir: idealistic posturing

or calculated plan?, 6(5) Journal of International Criminal Justice 2008;

14.Rastan Rod, Testing co-operation: the International Criminal Court and national

authorities, 21(2) Leiden Journal of International Law 2008;

15.Roper Steven D., Barria Lilian A., State co-operation and International Criminal Court

bargaining influence in the arrest and surrender of suspects, 21(2) Leiden Journal

of International Law 2008;

16.SáCouto Susana, Introductory note for the International Criminal Court: Appeal of the

Prosecutor against the ‘Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for a Warrant of Arrest against Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir’, 49 International Legal Materials

2010;

17.Ssenyonjo Manisuli, Case Comment. The International Criminal Court arrest warrant

decision for President Al Bashir of Sudan, 59(1) International & Comparative Law

Quarterly 2010;

18.Tunks Michael A., Diplomats or defendants? Defining the future of head-of-state

immunity, 52 Duke Law Journal 2002;

19.Vierucci Luisa, The European arrest warrant: and additional tool for prosecuting ICC

crimes, 2(1) Journal of International Criminal Justice 2004;

20.Williams Sarah, Sherif Lena, Case Comment. The arrest warrant for President

al-Bashir: immunities of incumbent heads of state and the International Criminal Court,

14(1) Journal of Conflict & Security Law 2009;

21.Wirth Steffen, Immunities, related problems, and article 98 of the Rome Statute, 12(4) Criminal Law Forum 2001;

22.Zappalà Salvatore, Do Heads of State in Office Enjoy Immunity form Jurisdiction for

International Crimes? The Ghaddafi Case Before the French Cour de Cassation,

12 European Journal of International Law 2001.

Intern et Sou rces

1. Institute of International Law: http://www.idi-iil.org; 2. International Court of Justice: http://www.icj-cij.org; 3. International Criminal Court: http://www.icc-cpi.int;

(7)

5. Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights: http://www2.ohchr.org; 6. Online Etymology Dictionary: http://www.etymonline.com;

7. The Official Home of UK Legislation: http://www.legislation.gov.uk; 8. United Nations Treaty Collection: http://untreaty.un.org.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Instytut Historii Kultury Materialnej PAN w ydał Materiały do bibliografii polskiej archeologii pradziejowej i wczesno­ średniowiecznej za lata 1918-1961 w opracowaniu L.. Łuki 9

9 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 4 November 1950 , Rome, 6 November 1990, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 11 to the Convention

– drafts and comments of international scholarly associations – decisions of national courts.. – national legislation –

At least three months before the date of the election, the Secretary-General of the United Nations shall address a written request to the members of the Permanent Court of

First, since the practice assessed above is based almost exclusively on Security Council action under Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter and General Assembly resolutions, it

W monografiach opracowanych przez niemiecką Komisję E, wśród surowców leczniczych pozyski- wanych z podbiału, oprócz liści i kwiatów wymie- nia się także ziele

Dr Z BIGNIEW K LIMIUK – adiunkt Katedry Instytucji i Rynków Finansowych w Instytucie Ekonomii na Wydziale Nauk Społecznych KUL; adres do korespondencji: Al.. High esteem, in which

Chcąc potraktować poważnie, zaproszenie sformułowane przez Mül- lera w konkluzji jego artykułu – by wspólnie myśleć o Wschodzie i spo- sobach, na jakie jego