• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Student perception of teacher’s personality

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Student perception of teacher’s personality"

Copied!
6
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Lenka Pelcerová

Student perception of teacher’s

personality

Edukacja Humanistyczna nr 1 (28), 131-135

2013

(2)

Szczecin 2013

Lenka Pelcerova

VSB-Technical University o f Ostrava, Czech Republic

S T U D E N T PE R C E PT IO N OF TEACH ER’S PER SO N A LITY

Introduction

Teachers are often exposed to stressful situations, w hich gives th e m m in im u m tim e to

rest an d m e n tal p reparation. N ow adays, fo rm a tio n o f stress is influenced by various factors,

su c h as large n u m b e r o f stu d e n ts in class w h ere th e n u m b e r o f p ro b le m a tic stu d e n ts is

growing; austerity m easures w hich has to be dealt b y school an d teacher; n u m b e r o f lessons

etc. Except th ese stressful situations, teachers face in c re asin g d em a n d s a n d requests th e n

reflected in quality o f their work. Especially, there are also dem ands on their skills and abilities

to flexibly an d correctly rea ct w h en w orking w ith in fo rm a tio n , th e ir effective search, and

reception and processing. F orth betw een these requirem ents and dem ands can be so rted e.g.

en durance, consistency, justice, conscientiousness etc. D ep en d in g on h ow teacher can cope

w ith th e requ irem en ts an d how he can cooperate w ith students, induces subjective stu d en ts’

view n o t only on his w ork b u t also o n his personality. Trend o f cu rren t society is em phasis on

flexibility, originality a n d n ew approaches. That is w hy is teachers’ d u ty to p repare students

for creative th in k in g and in d ep en d en cy in course of sem inars, n o t to be afraid to experim ent

an d to tr y new an d alternative approaches.

Questionnaire investigating information on how selected students perceive work

of the current university teachers

The q u e s tio n n a ire w h ich w as u se d as a rese arch m e th o d w as an o n y m o u s. The

q u estio n n a ire in c lu d ed 15 q u estions fo cu sed o n u n iv e rsity teachers; fro m w h ich 10 w ere

fo rm e d on scale 1 to 6 an d 5 questions were “o p en questions”. The sam ple consisted o f 124

stu d en ts o f VSB-Technical U niversity o f O strava o f w hich 71 were from second year an d 53

stu d en ts from 3rd year. F rom w hich 86 m e n an d 38 w om en.

Q uestion No. 1 (Graph 1):

S ubject th a t I a tte n d e d was in m y o p in io n le d by teacher:

uninteresting, b o rin g , v ery interesting.

(3)

132

Lenka Pelcerova

G raph 1

A s ■y o u c a n s e e f r o m F i g u r e N o , 1, m o s t o f t h e a n s w e r s a r e a r o u n d t h e m e a n v a l u e , w h i c h s a y s t h a t s u b j e c t w a s l e d n o t i n v e r y a t t r a c t i v e w a y f o r s t u d e n t s .

Q uestion N o. 2 (G rap h 2)

- W h a t is tir e c l a s s r o o m e n v i r o n m e n t - w i t h p o s s i b l e r n s w e r s - u n d u l y n o i s y ( s t u d e n t i n t e r f e r e n s e ) , e r e a t i v a , i n s p i r i n g ( m o d e r a t e d b y t e a c h e r )

G raph 2

T h is q u e s t i o n w a s a n s w e r e d m o s t l y w i t h a n s w e r N o . 4 a n d t h e n f o l lo w e d 3 , 2 a n d 5. W e c a n a s s u m e t h a t : s h u d e n t s с o n s i d e e t i t e e n v i r o n m e n t s l i g h t l y c r s a t i v e a n d i n s p i r i n g .

Question No. 3 (G raph 3) -

u n d e r s t a n d a b i l i t y o f g i v e n l e c t u r e s - m o s t o f t h e l e c t u r e s c o p e w a s f o r m e - i n c o m p r e h e n s i b l e , d u lly u n d e r s t a n d a b le .

G raph 3

F r o m G r a p h 4 is v i s ib l e t h a t a n s w e r 3 w a s s t r o n g l y r e p r e s e n t e d , f o l l o w e d b y -4 a n d 2. W e c a n c o n c l u d e t h a t t h e t e a c h i n g s u b j e c t w a s n o t f u l l y u n d e r s t o o d .

(4)

Q uestion N o. 4 ■wait focused on co m m u n ic ation lead ing betw een teach er a n d stu d ents.

The question was “C om m unication betw een teacher and students was in this lecture following:

n o n -n eg o tiable - m u tu a l respect, u n d ersta n d in g , hum oeous”. Foe th e resu lt, see G raph 4.

Graph 4

A ccording to th e result, th e co m m u n ic atio n b etw een teacher an d stu d en ts was led in

w ay o f m u tu a l respect, u n d ersta n d in g an d also w ith hum our. F rom this could be concluded

th a t com m unication is in friendly spirit. Q uote from publication of M iklosikova1 - “O ptim al

fu nction of interpersonal relationdhips fn course oflesson aro condition of creative; atm osphere

in classro o m . A tm o sp h e re is influ en ced b y v a riou s factors, fro m w h ich p edagogical style

belongs am ong m o st discussed”.

Ques

t

i on N"

0

. 5

, q u e s tio n n a ire w as focu sed o n s tu d e n ts q u estio n s - w h e tp er w ere

answ ered b y te ac h er o r n ot. The q u estio n was: S tudents ‘q uestions to te ac h er th a t did n o t

u n d e rsta n d the subject were: overlooked, ignored, and always answered.

Graph 15

S tudents were satisfied w ith the response to th e ir te ac h er’s questions abo u t th e topic

th a t u n d e rsta n d , w h ich show s us g rap h ic expression. 38 stu d e n ts w ere fully satisfied w ith

question answ ering. It was follow ed b y grade 5 th a t was chosen b y 42 s tu d en ts an d grade 4

(26 students).

O n teacher appearance was Cocused

question N o. 7

, w hich was: The te ac h er’s overall look

was; w ith possible answers: untidy, appropriate. This question was answ ered positively. Grades

5 and 6 w ere given by 86 stu d en ts from to ta l 124.

(5)

134

Lenka Pelcerova

Question No. 8

e v a l u a t e d t e a c h e r ’s s p e e c h - W h a t w a s y o u r i m p r e s s i o n f r o m t e a c h e r ’s s p e e c h ? T h e c h o i c e o f a n s w e r s w a s - i n c o m p r e h e n s i b l e , i n c o m p l e t e , u n d e r s t a n d a b l e , l o u d e n o u g h , a n d c o m p r e h e n s i v e . O n l y 4 s t u d e n t s e v a l u a t e d t h e t e a c h e r s s p e e c h a s u n d e r s t a n d a b le a n d c o m p r e h e n s i v e . M o s t l y ( 5 6 ) s t u d e n t s c h o s e g r a d e 3 , 2 0 c h o s e g r a d e 4 a n d 18 c h o s e 2 . It c o u l d b e s a i d t h a t t e a c h e r ’s s p e e c h w a s e v a l u a t e d m o r e o v e r n e g a tiv e ly .

Question N o. 10

( G r a p h 6 ) w a s f o c u s e d o n , h o w t h e l e s s o n is l e cL T h e q u e s t i o n i t s e l f w a s : “ L e s s o n is l e d w i t h p r e d o m i n a n c e o f ” m e c h a n i c a l t r a n s m i s s i o n o f i n f o r m e t i o n , w i t h e m p h a s i s o n t h e p r a c t i c a l a p p l i c a t i o n o f n e w k n o w l e d g e . T h is q u e s t i o n w a s e v a l u a t e d m o s t l y b y g r a d e 2 - 5 , w h e r e 3 w a s c h o s e n b y 4 6 s t u d e n t s . W e m a y c o n c l u d e t h a t t e a c h e r s t i l l t a k e s i n m i n d u s i n g n e w k n o w l e d g e i n p r a x e s o n l y p a r t l y a n d n o w a d a y s m e c h a n i c a l t r a n s m i s s i o n o f i n f o r m a t i o n s t i l l p r e v a i l . O t h e r q u e s t i o n s w e r e f o c u s e d o n h o w t h e e d u c a t i o n is l e d . A m o n g m o s t f r e q u e n t a n s w e r s t o q u e s t i o n “W h a t 3 n e g a t i v e r e m a r k s t o y o u r t e a c h e r y o u h a v e ” w e r e t h e s e : u n i n t e l l i g i b i l i t y ( 2 7 ) , w e i r d a c t i n g ( 2 0 ) , c a n n o t w o r k w i t h s t u d e n t s ( 1 6 ) . T o t h e q u e s t i o n “W h a t a r e y o u r 3 p o s i t i v e c o m m e n t s t o t h e t e a c h e r ”, s t u d e n t s a n s w e r e d a s f o llo w s : N i c e m a n n e r i n t h e c l a s s r o o m ( 2 2 ) , a l w a y s w e l l d r e s s e d ( 2 0 ) , a n d v e r s a t i l e e d u c a t e d ( 1 2 ) .

Conclusion

B e i n g a t e a c h e r m e a n s t o b e a b l e t o l e a r n a n d u n d e r s t a n d e d u c a t i o n a l e n v i r o n m e n t , s t u d e n t s a n d a ls o h i m s e l f , t o b e a b le t o s e n s i t i v e l y r e a c t o n s c h o o l s i t u a t i o n s , t o p r o p o s e a n d r e a l i s e o p t i m a l e d u c a t i o n a l s t r a t e g i e s . I t is e x p e c t e d f r o m u n i v e r s i t y t e a c h e r s , a s e d u c a t o r s o f a d u l t s , p e d a g o g i c a l a n d p r o f e s s i o n a l c o m p e t e n c e . E v e r y u n i v e r s i t y t e a c h e r s h o u l d r e a l i s e , w h e t h e r h i s t e a c h i n g a b i l i t i e s , s k ills a n d c o m p e t e n c i e s a r e s u f f i c i e n t a n d c o n v i n c i n g i n c o u r s e o f e d u c a t i o n a l p r o c e s s a n d w h e t h e r h e h a s s t i l l e n o u g h t o o ffe r. S e l e c t e d s e t o f s t u d e n t s p o s i t i v e l y e v a l u a t e d s t a t e d c r i t e r i a f o r g e t t i n g a c r e d i t a n d t e s t , f u r t h e r m o r e a p p r e c i a t e d e x c e l l e n t p r o f e s s i o n a l i s m , t e a c h e r o v e r a l l a p p e a r a n c e a n d h i s i n t e r e s t t o a n s w e r a l l s t u d e n t s ’ q u e s t i o n s . O n t h e o t h e r h a n d , a m o n g t h e n e g a t i v e s t h e y m e n t i o n e d w e i r d b e h a v i n g , i n c o m p r e h e n s i b i l i t y a n d m e c h a n i c a l t r a n s m i s s i o n o f i n f o r m a t i o n . T e a c h e r s ’ s p o k e n q u a l i t y is o n e o f t h e c r u c i a l a s p e c t s o f e f f e c tiv e t e a c h i n g . W e s h o u l d k e e p i n m i n d t h a t i n a v e r y b e g i n n i n g o f e d u c a t i o n a l p r o c e s s s h a l l b e f o r m e d a b i l i t y t o w o r k w i t h i n f o r m a t i o n i n m e a n i n g t h a t n o t o n l y s e a r c h a n d m e c h a n i c a l t r a n s m i s s i o n , b u t m a i n l y t h e i r

(6)

p ro p er processing, th eir application etc. F urtherm ore, related class clim ate set by teacher has

crucial influence o n students’ m otivation and th eir attitude to teach. Therefore, also teachers’

them selves shall have desire an d co m m itm en t to b ec o m e active teachers, w hich m ean s to

p repare professionally and grow in th eir entire life.

Lenka Pelcerova

Student perception o f teacher’s personality

The subject of teacher education is of experts’ particular interest and extensive discussions,

involved in the preparation of future teachers. Teaching of technical subjects has its specifics and it is

necessary to look for a teaching method that best reflects the latest trends in technology and information

technology. Especially for students of technical courses, the choice of correct and familiar resources is

significant for a successful, creative and interactive lecture leading.

Key words: university teacher, college student, pedagogical competence

Osobowość nauczyciela z punktu widzenia studentów

Kwestia kształcenia nauczycieli wywołuje wielkie zainteresowanie ekspertów zaangażowanych

w przygotowanie zawodowe przyszłych nauczycieli. Nauczanie przedmiotów zawodowych ma swoją

specyfikę i należy szukać takich form kształcenia, które najlepiej odzwierciedlą najnowsze trendy

w technikach i technologiach informacyjnych. Dobór odpowiednich form kreatywnego, interaktywnego

nauczania jest szczególnie istotny w przypadku studentów kierunków technicznych.

Słowa kluczowe: wykładowca, student, kompetencje pedagogiczne

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty