FLUORESCENCE PROPERTIES LENSES
OF
CATARACTOUS EYEAleksander Bal Ler
N. Copernicus Uni vers-i ty'
Grudzi4dzka 5
87-1oO Torurl, PoI and
ABSTRACT
T:le foss of Lransparency of Lhe oculal. l-ens is caused
by Lhe increase of lighL scaLLering as a result of s!:_ucLural changes and by ihe -increased absorpt.ion df the wlsible light due Lo t-he accumulaLion of piqmenls.
Fo:1owi ng pigmen!s
] NTRODUCfi ON
The pholol umi nescence of- Lhe eye lens was fifs!
reporled by Regnauld in 1458 [1]. Since then numerous st-rjdi es of Lhis pheDomenon, bolh in uil,o and irr uitro,
we.re perfor_med te-lo]- Ift ?)il,o lens fluo.escence can be undergo non-radia.t.iwe and .adiali\/e Clumj.nescence)
prccesses whtch can be moniLol'ed spect-.oscopi cal l y. The paper presenLs resldts conce.ning the e>€iLalion specL.a, dacay Limes and polarj.zatlon of t-he 1e::Lt cul ar fluo.escence. Fluorophore helerogeneily
ma::-if esLs llself ln alf Lhe e>qperimen.t.al dat.a- A
st-riking behaviour of Lhe emj"ssion anisot,ropy as a fu;:clion of Lenperat.ul'e is found, part,1cularly for cc:_llcaL calat'acL Ienses, indicaLino
ut il i zed
for lhe
for Lbe ea.l Y
evaluaLion of
deLecLiol., ol caLaracL t11l and Lhe anLicalaract drug effi cacy
L121
chromophores
Cfluo.ophores), also referred to as fluorogens' h;ve
al.aady been ident-ified t13-151 . AhrsorPlion .in Lhe UV
.egion belo\r 3OO nm is mainly due Lo Lhe aromaLic amino acids Lr'ypLophan, L)4'osine and Pheny.Lalanine Present, in .Ieirs prot-eins 1n t-e.tns of visual caPabilily lhis absorplion is insignificani. Chromophores absorbing in the visible range , however , conlrrbule d.irecLIy Lo the loss of Lhe .Lens Lransparency. A haze caLrsed by
their flrjorescence may also ini-erfe.e wilh vision t6l The idenlif.ied, visible lighl absorbing fluorophores
A nunber of
.i-r),?t-ophan deri vaLi ves
Pioperlies Cincluding raPid nano- and Picosecond
Prccesses). The --xLreme single Phot-on sensiliviLy of
mcde.n fl-uorescenge i-echniques Logelher wiLh Lhe hJs<iFrir i.\r +roir Eitu non-destr ucti ve
view of Lhe
N'-formylkl.nurenine, L-kynurenine and O-B -D-ql ucosi de oi 3-hydroxy- L-k),'nurenine, as we.L 1 as 3'3'-biLl,'rosine
anC anlhrani.Iic acid Cl,3-151 . In addii-ion, Lhel.e is a pcssibility of lhe accumufai-ion and relention of n!!ne. ous exLraneolrs tluorescenL comPounds, in paj_Lrcular orugs. such as Psoralens, Phenothj. azi nes, pc.ph),'rins or ai.lopurinol f161 .
Fluorescence nelhods are one of the moderr',
.a3idly developing, Loofs fo. probing Lhe biomofecula. s):sLenls t171 . Since fluorescence is sensit-ive Lo 't-he
P].cp-or!i es of lhe f I uoioPhore' s mol ecul ar envit_onm-anl,
i-hese melhods may be used Lo provide infortnaLion abouL il and in parlicular about its slrucLural and dl/namic
l.ansparency an imporLanl properLy is lLs absorptlon
speclrum 1n lhe vlslb].e range from abcrl 38O nanoneLers
ro
about, 7q9.!?q?l1L-9tli.
a9._9!13!qr _q,i:"ect measuremenLs of lhe spect-I'at disLribuLion of absorbed light are, owlng Lo slrong light- scaLLeriDg and lhe shape of lhe lens,very d-ifficulL Lo perform. T:)ese dlfficuliies can be avoj-ded eiLhef by using :ne phoLoacouslicmet-hod t3,1al o. by record.ing '-he fluorescence
lnlensily as a funclion of fhe exci_,aLion wavelenglh
Clhe ftud.escence excilation spectrrm) al a fixed emission wavelengt.h tal- Such a spect-rirn i"
"ti" to li'" abso.plion speclrum and may be, in p.tnc.iple, measqred in sitz as well as other fLuo.escence characterislics (i-ncluding ils emission sPecL.um, 3olarizaLion and
decay).
MATERI ALS AND METHODS
A Lolal of 102 lenses obtained as a resulL of inLracapsul.ar cat.al'acL exlractlon from Lhe Ey" DeparLnenL ot lhe Joinl Provincial H3spiLal in Torurl wer_e sludied The age of patienls ran3ed f.oJ11 O lo 87. Int-acL .Lenses were placed ln a special hotder belween
lwo quarlz windovs of O.5 tnm i-hickness conlaining no fluids and measuremenls were pei_formed Cunless oi-her.wise sLaLed) al room Lempefalure about one houa afler t-he operaLion . In some cases lhe fenses were
sT-ored for several days al OoC. Le;:s e\-Lracts were prepared accord-ing Lo Lhe follcwing pfocedure-DecaFsuleled ]enses were dessicaled in Lhe presence of
P-O^ for 4 daF .cu! rnt.o iour parls and pounded. Each par! was Lhen mixed wlLh a solvenL Cl:_is buifer pH 7.5
lhe nd><Lure '.ras honogenized fo. 1O minut-es 1n an ul!:_asonic bath and cen!!'ifuged. Aqueous sofut-ions were
adcjlionally dialysed lo reduce lighL scat-le.ing'
ot-i.e.l^llse inlerfertng wj.Lh absorplion measuretlent-s ' and lo slu<iy lhe effecl of .emoval of ProLeins and oLher
rhaca orno.I ec ul, a. malerial 0n Lheir f.Luorescence
AbsorpLion sPecl.a ware measured using a Specord
uV--rT S specLroPholomeLer fl'otn C. Zeiss'Jena CEasL Ge.:.any) - Fl!lo.escence excilat-ion antl emission sPeclra
v,/ere recorded on a home bu-ifL versalile
comPuler-cor-'-r ol I ed photon-counLing speclrofl uori met,e. equtPPed v/i'-r': Dolarizers. MeasuremenLs ot fluoaescence
ex.:'-at-ion spect,.a required the use of Lhe qurntum
co'.i!ef sofuLion of rhodam-ine B in eLhylene glycot
C3g,'1).-in Lhe reference channei of Lhe insli'umenL. Wilh
lh:s quant-um count-er lhe highest- accuracy rs obrained
in --ire range of excilalion wavelenglhs tt'rriled t,o 36() -6CC nm. Emission sDeclra \teFe nol correcled for Lhe
specLral sensii-iviLy of lhe deLecling sysLem. Ftu.rescence decay curves were measured wilh a home
burll !ime-cor.e]aLed single photon Danosecond flL3roneLe. using a niliogen-filIed flashlanP. The f i:'-: Le lime-widLhs of Lhe excillng lighL pulse and Lhe ins:.umenLal .esponse Can ove.all halfwidlh ot abou! 2 na::3seconds) .equired t-he use of a deconvolut-ron
'he fl!:=rescance inlensiLy lo an infinitely shorL
€x.:t-ai-ion pul.se Clhe so calIed imPulse response). A
leasl squares filt-inq deconvol.uLion p.ocedure was used
lo .ecover t.he fluorescance decay parameLel.s t1Sl . In aI: exci taLi on-eni ssi on sLudies, fron! face exciLaLion
of the anLerior part of lhe -Lens was aFF.lied. fbe ill'rnrinaLed area, abouL a mmz, was cenL-ared on lhe
di.recLion made an angfe of 45- wl!h' Lhe lens axis and
Lhe fluorescence erlission was observed along Lhis axis. Conslruclion det-ails of ou. inslrurnent-s are avallable
LeL us first. presenl Lhe resulLs obLained for
cat-aracLous lens e\'lracLs. TyPl ca.t absorPlion specLra
ol such exlracls are shovrt iTr-:iFigsiti and
2-AceLon-it.ile e\.!racts absortrLlon in i-he 2OO
-exhi bi led
600 nm range- The
st-rongesi-t-he f] uorescence -of i-he sludied ex-Lracls. In
absorDlion was found for aqueous exl-.ac1-s and app-aars lo be main.Iy due to lhe Presence of Lhe aromatic amino
acids in lhe exLraci-ed sutrslance. The speclra' ot e!hano]ic and cyclohexane e).Lracfs are similar lo each
olher,bul dllfer slrongly in t-heir inlensiLy' shape and posit-ion wiLh resPecl Lo lhe speci-ra of aqueolJs ex'LracLs. It is lnteresLing Lo nole LhaL Lhe aqueous
ex-L.acls spectl'a markedly exLend iDLo t-he .visible range for nucLear ar,d
'rli xed cal-aracLs CFig. 1) ' bul
nol for Lhe sugar calaract- CF.ig.2)
The fluoaescence speciaa were' measured for all df lhe prepared e\-|racls,using Lwo exciLatlon wavelenqLhs:
366 nm and 436 nrA. OnIy lhe aqueous e\-t-racls exhibiled
nreasurable fluol'escence under Lhese condilions and lhe posit-ion and shape oi Lhe enrission band \'/er e iound to
be exciLalion wavel englh-dePendent cFig- 3). The same
figure also shows lhe p.onounced effecl oi dialysis on parlicula. dialysis leads lo a several-fo-ld increase of Lhe emission inLensiL,y and shifLs Lhe maxi tnum of Lhe e)llission exciLed wit-h Lhe 436 nrn ligh! fl'on about- 5OO
nm Lo 52O nm.
All of Lhe following .esu.It-s were obt.aj- ned fol'
whole lnlacL lenses. Flgure 4 sho\'.s examFLes of normalized f.luorescence spect-ra of lhree .lehses. These spect-ra are strongly e),-ci!a!ion rtavefengl-h-dependenl,
revea-Iirig Lhe he|erogeneit-y of f.Luoraphore,s. Flgufe 5
displa]s Lhe same speci-ra, buL wiLh l'elalive inlensllI€.s p.eserved for each excitat'ion wawelenglh.
Figure 6 pl.esenls lypical f.Luorescence exciLalion specL.a {Lhe .aLio or LI_,e Dumber of em-ilLed phoLons Lo Lhe nunber of incide.lt- phoLons as a funclion af Lhe excilalion wavelengLh) of Lranspareni Ca) and cat-aracLous Ct',cf IenEes. These excilaLion specLra
sLrongly depend on t-he wavel, ength used to observe
fluorescence (5OO,55o,600,650 and 7OO nm) which is again arr -indicat.r,rn of t-he hele.ogeneily of t-"he
fluorophare populalion CFartlcularly evldent- in Fig.6 b
and c)-An inleresting flndinq is Lhat 5 oul of 6 su€raf
cal-aracL fenses are charact-erized bv Lhe same sDecLra *hown 1n Fig.6c.
Figure 7 p.esenls fluorescence exciLaLj-on speclr.a
detined as
4J ll-1ry761 ll.s 211 , where I and T- are the parallel
and Lhe Ferpendicular polai_lzalion cor*ponents af Lhe ffuorescence inlensiLy lrt Lhe case of a linearly pofarized excitat-lon ligh!, fo. Lwa Lyp.i ca.L cases ot
cataraclous and t-t.anspafenL Ienses. The enlsslot) anisoi-foFy aFFears Lo be essenLia.Il.y consLanL across t-he exclLaLion specLrum. A sfiEhl increase \cl t-h rising
excilat-ion wawelenglh may p.obabfy be attriL'uled Lo
some Ieakage of the st-rongly scaLt-ered excitalion l-ighl lhrough Lhe evldsslon monochr'omaLor. This effecl is more
F.onounced fo. t-he cat-aracLous Iens.
deDendence of Lhe emission anisot-ropy' oblained on healing CFigs.8,s) and bot-h on heat-ing and cooliDg.
Typicat resulLs oi Lhe fLuorescence decay measuremenLs lor lenses no.6'F and I Csee exciLation speclra in figures 4 and 5) obt-ained using lhe 337 nio
ex.il-aL.ron are shown in TabIe 1. T1-t"y .ePresen! Lhe
inpulse response of fluorescence' which was assumed Lo
be a sum of three exDonent-ials: T],"" " ',
TABLE 1
A:ri i Ludes d Cre]al-rve) and Decay Times
F!uorescence Dec.y for Lenses
"".$"fl ana 5 d:fferenL Endssion Wavelenglhs Xen
\tavel engt.h: 337 nrn. ExcilaLion I ns] t nml I nsl lnsl
6(
o. e4 1.34 o.7 o.a o.7 4.7 o.5 o.24 o. a6 o.17 o.04
13. 6 o.05
17. L o.04
s.4 o.02
10.3 o.01
12. 6 q? o- 56 o.55 o.5e 1.8 r-4 o.27 o. 1s o. eo o.oos
27. a o.04
10.9 o.01
e7.7 o.oo4
86.2 a6 o.70 o.55 o.50 o.6 1.5o.4t
o.25 o.o9
7.7 o.04
14. a o.os
11.8The resulLs shown .in Table 1 indicale lhal Lhe ffuorescence decay of a lral.tsParent- Iens no.5 tnay
indeed be .epresenl.ed by Lhree exponenLials wiLh decay lirnes essenlially independenL of lhe emission
\ravelengLh, bul in Lhe case of Lhe lenses no.6 and 7 more componanls are requ.ired i-o adequalely represenr
lhe daLa.
Dl SCUSSI ON
Fluorescence heLerogeneily of cat-aract-ous eye
lenses is maniiesLed in aII ol Lhe resulls Presenled
in t-he foregoing secLion. Dialysis did nol remove.lhe excilaLion wavelengLh dePendence of the aqueous ex'lracLs, \rhich indicales Lhat t-he main faclor in Lhe observed helerogeneiLy is t-he p,'esence ol warious
fluorophores, white Lhe effecl of lbe f.Luorophore si!e
heLerogeneiLy rs ]ess imporLanL. The inlLuence of Lhe macromolecu.lar env.!ronment cabsenL rn dialysed a\-|raclsl nanifesLs it-seff, howeve. ' in Lhe quenchinel
of lhe ffuorescence emission in Figure 3. A
dialysis, in Figul'e 3b, indicat-es LhaL Lhe environmenL
ol lhe ftuorophores seleclive]y exciled wil-h Lhe 436 ntn
IiqhL is in non-dialyzed e\-i-ract-s mosl likery hydrophob.i c.
' Fluorescence sPecLl'a shown in Figure { demonslrat'e lhaL Lhe Lluorophore PoPuIaLion oi the Lransparent- neonalaf lens is -.Iess heterogeneous
comFared wiLh mat-ure and s--n-i]e caLa.act- lenses This
concfusion is supporled by t-he decay Lime dala sho\{r1 i-n Table 1.
The lluorescence of lhe ll.anspa:'enL lens 1s of rele!j.vely smal,I int'ensii-y CFig-5). In parLicular'
ccxnpa:ing Lhe inLensiLjes in F.igure 5c one can iudge
!:::.! Lhe concentratlon of f.IuoroPhiores Lhe t:ans?arenL lens, exciLed with Lhe 4O5 nm Irght-' is a:oul lv/o orders of magnilude smaller Lhan in the Lwo
c_-her lenses.fhis conliI'ms earlier findings t15l LhaL l:ght absorption of 'he aging lens rs proerressj vely e!'LenCing inlo .Lonqer wavelengLh' regions of lhe
s:ec L l_ uJlr.
SirdLar .ernarks can be made aEoal lhelruoieltence axcilat-ion speclra in lhe visible range shown in Figu.e e. f:1 addi!ion, bowever, one observes a disLincl
s?,ecl:_a] palle.n foi^ suga. cat-a'.acL Ienses
CFig-6c)-ResulLs of lha emlssion anrsotropy measu'.emenLs canncr be unFqu.iwoca--y InterpreLed. ILs val ue rs 1::tluenced by t-oo many factors involving lhe f: qorcphores and their environmenL' .which are beyoid
canLrol- These include Lhe sl.uctural' ordering '!he r::lransic angles belween abso.pt-j-on and emiss.ion dpo-Les of aluo.ophores, Lherr rol-alional mobiliLy and i:)lernal f.Iexibilily on lhe nanosecond Lime-scale, Lhe e:ect-ronic exciLalion energy transfer t17l and also l:gh! scattering and brrelrr ngence r2Ol of the Iens
The obt-ained t-emperalure dependence of the e:!ission anisolropy is qu-ile challenging CFigs-a,S and 13)- For i-nsLance, lhe incl'ease of Lhe emission
a.iisolropy wilh rising lemperaLure CFj.gs.8 and 10) is inexplicable. one would ralher expect- iLs value lo deci'ease, which is fhe (lsual properLy of the f-uorescence anrsoLr.opy of solulions t17l and is caused
b-,' rapld .andom:zalion ol phoi-ose]ect-ed
,n3fecular o.ient'at-ions due Lo fasLe. roLalional d:ffusion aL elevai-ed lenp-^raLures. A st-rikiner
behavlour of the emission a-isotropy is obserwe,d for co.llcal caLaracL Ienses (Fl9,9). 1l appears lhat, a sorl of phase transiL1on Lakes pface in Lhese lense,s aL
abouL zO-C. A diflerenl palt-din is Sbsefve(faoa't
auga-shovrn in Fiqure 14. These spec1-r a cor r espond calaract- .Iens CFig- 1O) whose enlssion anisot.opy
dlsp-Lays a m.inimum, z.1so al abouL zOoC, on heating.
This lrdnimum does nol appear on cooling.
In view of lhe above findiners il seems approprtale lo draw lhe at-lenLion ot olher inve.st.igat-ors lo Lhe necessiry of Lhe temperaLure conLrol Cwithin 1oC) in Lhelr sLudies of physical p].ope.Ltes of lhe lens.
The daLa shown in :table 1 were analy.zed in lerms
of lhe fract-ldnal cont-ribuLions f CX€m) - d?., t .x.r. Ci = 1,a,3) of each of t-he t.hnee cornponenLs i-o lhe t'olal fluorescence int-ensiLy. This unique., Lhree component, decomposiLion was posslble only fol.
-Lhe
lr_ansparenl neonalal lens no.6. ResulLs oi such an anall.'sis are shown in Figufe 11- The fracLionaL
conlrib(llions f CX ) were Lhen used Lo resolve Lhe
composlle emission spect,.um of Lhe Iens no.6 CLhe solid fine in Fig.4a) inLo t-hree componenLs- This vas accompfished by simply nulLip-lying the composi !e speclrum by f and Lhe resulLing componenl s'pecLra are presumably t.o lhrae diffefent- ffuo.escent species.
Such a unrque lhree componenl decomposit,ion was
not Dossible for lenses no.it and no.tr which indrcares a larger helerogeneily ot lhe fluorophore populalion
Cmore t.han Lhree speci--s) in opacified Ienses.
Sioce the presented resuf!s raise more questions Lhan trrovide furlhel. si-udies of Lhe eye_ .Iens
fluorescence are needed. ,The author hopes Lhat lhis oplnion wiII be shared by lhe l'eadef.
ACKNOWLEDGE}'€NTS
T::e author is graleful for Lhe cooperation of
L, tsi €;qz:!3\,,sk i , M. D. and lhe personne] ol Lhe Ey.
De?aI.L=e:l'. ol t-he Jolnt- Provincia] Hospit-al in
Torun-Ti? assisLance of :f. Marszalek, A. Prenlka, A. iaai.bcL::r.zek and D. Heweli is also appreciai.ed- The v,c.k r_a-: ca''.ie.d oui under lhe - Fesearch Projecl
RR.
1.1:-REFERENCES
1. Re5:-,a.r1d J: Sur 1a fluorescence des milieux de 1'ce:: chez I'homme eL quelques mammi feFes,
L' I ::s--i:ul 26: 41OC1aSA)
2. Ku.:el RB,HoIbarshL ML and Yamanashl BS: Spectral sLu:ies on no.rnal and caLaracLous inlacl humarr
4.
I enses, Exp. Eye. Res.17:65C1973)
Ler:-a;: S , Yamaneshi BS ,Pa]mer RA ,Roark JC and
Bork-an R: PhoLoacoust.i c, fL uor escence and lighL
t-ra:_-s::lission spectra of nol'mal ,aglng and cat-aaacLous
-t e.5es, OphLhal ni c Res.1O:16aC1S7a)
Jac.3s R and Krohn DL : Fluorescence inlensily of human .I ens
I nwes--. ODhi-haImol.2O: 117( 1981)
Bes', jA van , TJin A Tsoi EWSJ , Bool JP and
Oos_,e:r':'ris JA : In v-i vo assessmenL of lens
ira::-s--lssion fo. blue-gr€,en lighl by
aul.:ilro.escence measuremenl, Ophthatrdc Res.
17:3'::1SaS)
WeLe RA : Human Ienticular fluorescence and t-ra:-s::ssrviLy,and rheir effecLs on vision, Exp. Eye
Res, {1: 457C1985)
Ba:..e. A, Biegano\^,ski L and Mal.szalek T:
Phc_-.]urni nescence oi lhe ocu.lar tenses.Kllnika Oczna SO: 4:-: ( I gAA), in Po]ish
8. Bal-,e. A, B-i eqano\^rsk -i L, Macie-je\,ski K and
Mars:al ek T: Measul'ehen.-s ol i-he speclra of fIu=:e..ence of t.ranspafenL and cat,aracLous
.Iense,s, Kf inika Oczna gO:474C1S88), in polish
g. BaI'-g;. A : Ftuorescence excit'atj.on speclra of opa.c::ied Ienses, Klinika Oczna SO: 476C1SaA) , in
Pol i sb
10.
Yu NT,Cal ltz,
Ho DJY.I aser -scanni ng-mi crobearn
ana.Lysi s
and Kuck JFP Jr. : Autom,aLed
ll uor escence,,Raman l mage
.Iens wlLb mu.I ti channel
deLect.ion: Evidence for neLabofic production of a
green fluorophor, Pfoc. NaLI _ Acad. Sci. USA a5: 103( 1 gAa)
11. Lel'man S: NMR and lluorescence spectroscopy oi the nol.tnal ,aging and calaractous Iens:rn vrtro and rn vivo appl i caLi ons, Lens Pesearch 1:175C1S43)
12. Le.man S: In v-ivo melhods to eval.uaLe ocula. drug
effi cacy and si de eflecLs , Concept"s Toxi cot .
4: ATaLSAT)
13. Heyningen R wan :Assay of fluorescent glucosides rn the human 1ens,Exp. Eya Res.15: t2!CIg73)
14- Garcia-Cast,:ineiras S, DilIon J -:and Speclor A: Non-LrrcLophan lluorescence associaLed wiLh human
Iens protein: apparent comp_Lexity and isola.lion of bil),.rosine . and ant,hl.anific acid, Exp. Eve Res. 26: 461C197a)
15. Lerman S:Radiant. energy and Lhe eye, Macnfl]an, New
York 1gao
16. Dayha!/-Ba.ker P, Fo.bes D, Fox D, Lerman S, McGi nness J, Waxl er M and Fel ten R : Diug phololoxicity and vrsual heallh. 1n Oplical Radialion and Visual HealLh Cvaxler M and Hilchins VM,eds. ),Boca Ralon,CRC P'.ess C1SA6),pp.747-L75
17. Lakowicz JR: Principtes of iluorescence
specLroscopy, PIenum Press,New York 1983
1E. Bel'nini U, Reccia R, Russo P and Scala A :
QuanLit-at,ive phoLoacousLic spectroscopy of J. Phol ochem,
Phot.obioL ,B: Bloloqy 4:4O7C199O)
19. Demas JN: Exc-i,i-ed st-ale fifelilne measuremenLs.
Acadenic Press. Ne\v York 1983
aC. V/eale RA: Sex, age and Lhe birefringence of tha human c.ysLalIina .Iens, ExpI Eye Res:2S: 449C1979)
Figure capt-ions
FI CURE 4
Normalized fluorescence speclra of leises oblained al warious exciLaLion wavelengt.hs: 3Oe ni - doLled line, 334 nm - broken line, 4O5 nm - solid l:ne.
No.6 - transparenl neonatal rens, no.p - partj.ally opaque .lens f.om an enucleaLed eye, no.$ - senfle
cat-aract- lens.
exLracls for wiLtsl O. O? %
31 , .lens no.e
-spec!.a ob',ai ned
^L fi>(ed : a) Lransparent, Iens, b) and
Absoipl-ion specLl.a of caLa.ac,t-ous fens
cm opLical paLh: a) tris buffer pH 7.5
added, b) elhanol , c) cyclohexane.
Lens no. 1 - nuclear caLaracL, ma-Ie mi xed calaracL, fema.Ie 85.
FI GUPE 2
Same as in figufe 1 fo. sugar cat-a.acl- lenses.
Lens no-3 - f.76, .Lens no.4 -
f.65-..
Influence of diatysis on the fluciescence aqueous axLract. oi Lhe ..Ie!1s no. 1 exciLed'
v/avelenglhs: a) 366.nn and b) 436 Dm.
FI GURE 5
Same as in iigure 4, bul wiLh rela.,ive inLensil.ies
FI GURE 6
F.Iuorescence e)<ci Lali on emission wavel englhs for c) cat-al.act-ous .Lenses.
NiNg
FI GURE 7
Typical flliorescence exciLat-ion sp--c:-.a obt-ained for lhe 55O nm emission and t-he correspc:ding spect.ra ot
TemperaLul.e dependence of Lhe ffuorescence anisc]Lropy
of: four' lenses: a) f.66 and b) f.Aa - m-i xed cat,aract
.IeDses, c) f.61 - almost transpareni- non-cataracLous
-.--fens--cf f.68 - nucl€ar- cai-aiact fens.
Temperat.ure dependence of
for L\..o cor!ical calaract- lenses: a) f.6a, b) the fllrorescence ani m.59:soLropy
dependence of lhe fluoiescence anlsot..opy caLaract- Iens Cf.78): a) on Lhe day of the
b) five days l aler
-FI GURE 10
FT GURE 11
Fr acLi cnal .inLensilies of lhe
full .ci rc-I es -Csee Tab]e 1).
Lhre- .fluorescence decay
opeD.ircles - z.
FI GURE 12
Li feLi cte-r esol ved speclral components of !he UV
exciLei C334 n tluorescence emission of t.he lransFarenL neonalal Iens Clhe decomposilioD of lhe solid fine speclrum In Fig.4a).
0.8
T,q,4
(]n
0l
5
LtJ(J
z
m
tr
a
co54
LENS
N0.
WAVENUMBER
I 103
cml
l
50
Ll-lz.
<^
c0u
t
tn
coLENS
4L
r-,
ofrq
n
LENS
NO. 11"""
=
366 nm AF ILK UIALY5IJ BEFORE DIALYSISF
Qz
LU F z. Lrl c)z
trj (J LUc
o
J L! LU F .J LUE
600.
5007.
I
nm ] 400['1
l"
i
fi,,).t*
l^
LENS
NO.,Il.*".=
436
nmAFTER
DIALYSISBEFORE
DIALYSISF
(nz
l--z
!u (-)'z
Lll (Ja
LUE
l
J
L! LIJ F J LU450
s00 600I
Inm
Ii1;'"
4 (lrrr
:...t
tr'. z. z. LLI {t
'ii'\
O LJ) c)o
rt,o
r)
Oo
O c\ O.: Ltl C O c) -T-Ln ;--1 z.6r!
LU-o
O-u
\t=a
U)H:
O !o LN O O LO O LN O {.. r-N Cf) ul O./^n.n--
? -a'"r''
O
z.
U) z. LU _\_:\_= II
paz]lDurroul
AllsNllNl
O O (o O Lt) O O t') \ O Lr' O O u_) Lt) ' _T'
z
L.IJ LU/'1 <
z
o
@o(n
cq>
,t!a
!n O LNT
O |, Ec
ct ce O Lr) .J r-rtz
a
z
tJJ I ((o
.'dl
u)l
z;
LI ,'F-O
z
(nz
ul Ec
No
c.) ( \d
\ It
t.^-z c]-|1, z tr
i
E Eo E.t
{"r.n
e ElltsNtlNr
tJNStslS0n-H 3A tiv'tl8
1n
t
i.
L i:400
500
3lu
TRANSPARENT
LENS
450
0.5
1.0F
a-z.'<
L!
LLIF-
o-rllO
t\rY
lrllJ() vl
AZ
H<
>z
JC)
tr
--a
..a
=>
J
LJ-lE.
CATARACTOUS
LENS
EA
?..'7
t Itlttl"*.
Inm
J500
0t
0.3 1-0 3010
20 o_O
E, Fo
(t
z
lrJz
t!a
L!' Go
f
l,.Lri.
t
20 10 30 a..'arTla
_{;6
TT6Q'f
qAe-
.I alI)o
.9t.t::)J:-0.3 40 30 20 10 0.? U.J o_
o
&
f-o
t")z
LLI (-)z
(_) U)c
l
_) l! 0.140
rt'cl
r:r Ll
/\,1.:rll",,It
t
a-
-o
I
0.3
t0
30 20 JO 0.2 0./. o-Oc
Fo
I
z
LrJ CJ UJ (Ja
LrJ E.l
J L!I
Y II
-I
d
Yr
A -r- - I r r I
'Y 9QiI
{Y-Eir
t--Tt'Cl
.A
A
Id ?'
Y T' T-!ti
ooQ TI
1i
T-6dxbI-
.IY:
T Q 1--{-o
heoiing o.Fi7
to\
' [y-t(,r
LENS
NO.
5
400
450
500
550
WAVELENGTH
Inm]
1.0
-a
z
LrlF
n6
z
''-J
z,
t-O
U.4
t-LL02
n
U |', .4A
btt(v'
1.0