• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

"The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Part XXVI", ed. with notes by E. Lobel, London 1961 ; "The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Part XXVIII", ed. with notes by E. Lobel, London 1962 ; "The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Part XXVII", ed. with translations and notes by E. G. Turner [et al.],

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share ""The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Part XXVI", ed. with notes by E. Lobel, London 1961 ; "The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Part XXVIII", ed. with notes by E. Lobel, London 1962 ; "The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Part XXVII", ed. with translations and notes by E. G. Turner [et al.],"

Copied!
10
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)
(2)

The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Part X X Y I . Edited with notes by E. L o b e 1. London 1961, pp. 186 + Plates X X .

The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Part X X V I I I . Edited with notes by E. L o b e l . London 1962, pp. 90 + Plates X I .

The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Part X X V I I . Edited with translations and notes by E . G . T u r n e r — John R e a — L. K o e n e n — Jose Ma Fernandez Ρ о m a r. London 1962, pp. 224+Plates XII.

Volume X X Y I , devoted entirely to Pindar, contains fragments of some heretofore unknown works and of verses that might as well be his, with the commentaries on the known works and a new Life of the poet. The latter, published as the first text of the volume, no. 2438, brings the main contents of a narrow strip of the papyrus which also preserves the ends of the first six lines of a preceding column in a different hand and about a different matter. The new Life tells about the poet's nationality and family, supplies the dates of his death and works. The poet's portait agrees with some of the known vitae in many details, yet it lacks some other details which they have already supp-lyed. On the other hand it brings a number of facts not to be found in other biographies (e.g. Corinna as the authority for the name Scopelinus of Pindar's father, a slightly different list of works etc). The writing is from the late second or third century.

No 2439 presents four small fragments written in the same hand, of which one exhibits a part of the eight Isthmian Ode. The Editor thinks therefore that the others are perhaps fragments of other Isthmians, which were lost in our unique codex. The writing is an uncial, probably later than the first half of the first century.

Three new small fragments (late second century) of Pindar's Paeans (coin-cidences with P. Oxy 1791, 841 and 2442) are published as no. 2440 together with many corrections (16 new combinations) and additions (frr. 69-138) to P. Oxy 1792, the indentification of this text with Pindar's Paeans being pre-sently confirmed by the coincidence of the 15-th combination (fr. 60 + a new fr.) with Рае. VI, 128-31.

No. 2441 : one larger and two very small fragments of the middle of the second century. The poem in the second column of the first fragment (most of an 8-lined strophe and the first two lines of the antistrophe in the Aeolic

(3)

398 A. ŚWIDEREK m e t r e ) is i d e n t i f i e d t e n t a t i v e l y b y t h e E d i t o r as a προσόδιον (11. 1 1 - 2 2 coincide w i t h P . O x y 1792). N o . 2 4 4 2 : 112 f r a g m e n t s a t t r i b u t e d b y t h e E d i t o r t o P i n d a r ' s Hymns, Paeans a n d o t h e r w o r k s ; a m o n g t h e m t h e l a r g e r or m o r e i m p o r t a n t s e e m t o b e : f r . 1 ( c o i n c i d e n c e w i t h t h e a n c i e n t q u o t a t i o n f r . 88, p r o b a b l y p a r t s of t h e f i r s t of t h e Hymns); f r . 7 (some i n c i d e n t c o n n e c t e d w i t h E l e c t r y o n ? ) ; f r . 14 ( p a r t l y p r e s e r v e d also in P . O x y 8 4 1 f r r . 16, 17, 1 8 ; f r . 22 ( j o i n e d b y t h e E d i t o r w i t h P . O x y 2440 f r . 2, P . O x y 841 f r . 87, 90, 143, P . O x y 1791, P i n d . f r . 5 3 ) ; f r r . 2 8 - 3 1 ( f r a g m e n t s c o n t a i n i n g n o t e s r e f e r r i n g p r o b a b l y t o s o m e P i n d a r i c m a t t e r , t h e t e x t itself b e i n g a l m o s t c o m p l e t e l y l o s t ) ; f r . 32 (coincidence w i t h P . O x y 1792 f r . 31) ; f r . 39 ( t e x t w i t h a m a r g i n a l n o t e o f f e r i n g s o m e e x p l a n a t i o n of Κρόνιος as a p p l i e d t o P e l o p s : f r . 96 A a n d B ) . N o . 2443 ( l a t e s e c o n d c e n t u r y ) a n d N o . 2444 ( l a t e f i r s t or e a r l y s e c o n d cen-t u r y ) b r i n g s m a l l f r a g m e n cen-t s (7 a n d 19 r e s p e c cen-t i v e l y ) of n o cen-t i d e n cen-t i f i e d c h o r a l l y r i c . N o . 2 4 4 5 : 32 f r a g m e n t s , a s it seems, b y t h e s a m e h a n d as P . O x y 1604 a n d 1788 (late 2 n d c e n t u r y ) , c o n t a i n i n g r e m n a n t s of c h o r a l l y r i c ; t h e l a r g e s t f r . 1 b e i n g a l y r i c a l n a r r a t i o n of t h e s t o r y of P e r s e u s , t h e E d i t o r t h i n k s i t likely t o b e p a r t of t h e s a m e m a n u s c r i p t of P i n d a r ' s Dithyrambs as P . O x y 1604. N o . 2 4 4 6 : 35 v e r y s m a l l f r a g m e n t s ( 2 n d / 3 r d c e n t u r y ) i d e n t i f i e d as P i n d a r ' s Hyporchemata b y t h e c o i n c i d e n c e of f r . 1 w i t h P i n d . f r . 111. N o . 2447 b r i n g s 57 s m a l l f r a g m e n t s ; in t w o of t h e m ( f r . 15 a n d f r . 38) a r e i d e n t i f i a b l e a n c i e n t q u o t a t i o n s of P i n d a r ; t h e w r i t i n g is a s c r i b e d b y t h e E d i t o r t o t h e l a t e 2 n d c e n t u r y . U n d e r N o . 2448 t h e r e a r e p u b l i s h e d 18 f r a g m e n t s of 2 n d / 3 r d c e n t u r y , a t t r i -b u t e d t o P i n d a r , c h i e f l y o n t h e s t r e n t h of t h e c o i n c i d e n c e f r . 1, 2 seg. = P i n d . f r . 215. N o . 2449 ( 2 n d / 3 r d c e n t u r y ) is a small f r a g m e n t , p r o b a b l y of a c o m m e n t a r y o n P i n d a r , r e f e r r i n g , a c c o r d i n g t o t h e E d i t o r , t o t h e p o e t i c a l t e x t p u b l i s h e d as N o . 2448. N o . 2 4 5 0 : 14 f r a g m e n t s in a p u r e u n c i a l f r o m t h e 1st o r t h e e a r l y 2 n d cen-t u r y , a cen-t cen-t r i b u cen-t e d cen-t o P i n d a r b y cen-t h e o c c u r r e n c e i n cen-t h e l a r g e s cen-t of cen-t h e m (fr. 1) of t w o a n c i e n t q u o t a t i o n s ( P i n d . f r . 169 a n d P i n d . f r . 3 1 6 ) ; f r . 1 c o n t a i n s 2 co-l u m n s p a r t i a co-l co-l y p r e s e r v e d (coco-l. I I a n d coco-l. I co-l co-l ) , b u t t h e co-l a s t f i v e co-lines of c o co-l u m n I

a r e k n o w n f r o m P i n d . f r . 1 6 9 ; it seems p r o b a b l e t h a t t h i s is a p a r t of o n e of t h e d i t h y r a m b s ; t h e s t r u c t u r e of t h e piece is t r i a d i c , t h e s t r o p h e a n d a n t i s t r o p h e c o n s i s t each of t h i r t e e n lines, t h e e p o d e of a n u n k n o w n n u m b e r , p e r h a p s a b o u t f o u r t e e n ; f r r . 2 - 1 4 a r e v e r y s m a l l s c r a p s . N o . 2 4 5 1 : f r a g m e n t s of a c o m m e n t a r y o n P i n d a r ' s w o r k s , A f r r . 1 - 4 o n Isthmians I , I V , V I - Y I I I ; В f r r . 1 - 1 7 o n u n i d e n t i f i e d t e x t s ( f r . 14 p e r h a p s p a r t of a c o m m e n t a r y on a n Isthmian w h i c h h a s n o t s u r v i v e d ; f r . 17 p a r t of a c o m m e n t a r y o n a n ώσχοφορικόν), w r i t t e n in a c u r s i v e of t h e f i r s t or e a r l y

(4)

s e c o n d c e n t u r y o n t h e b a c k of a n o f f i c i a l a c c o u n t b o o k of a b o u t t h e m i d d l e of t h e f i r s t c e n t u r y . V o l u m e X V I I I , b e i n g p u b l i s h e d b y t h e s a m e E d i t o r , E . L o b e 1, is d e v o t e d a g a i n t o t h e n e w t e x t s of a single a u t h o r , t h i s t i m e t h o s e of H e s i o d . N o . 2 4 8 1 b r i n g s f r a g m e n t s w r i t t e n b y t h e s a m e c o p y i s t as D ( P S I 1301), f r o m t h e s e c o n d c e n t u r y , o n e of t h e m a t l e a s t , f r . 3, c a n b e a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e f i r s t b o o k of H e s i o d ' s Catalogue. U n d e r t h e a b o v e n a m e d n u m b e r t h e E d i t o r p u b l i s h e s o n l y s c r a p s of u n i d e n t i f i e d stories, f r r . 6 - 1 2 , a n d f r . 3 (fr. 3, 6 s e q q . = H e s . f r . 15 R z .2) ; f r r . 1(a), (b), 2, 5(a), (b) c o m b i n e d w i t h s o m e f r a g m e n t s of o t h e r m a n u s c r i p t s a r e f o u n d u n d e r o t h e r n u m b e r s i n t h e s a m e v o l u m e . N o . 2 4 8 1 f r . 5(a) I c o n t a i n s t h e e n d s of t h e lines of w h i c h t h e i n i t i a l p a r t s (11. 1 6 - 3 0 ) a r e f o u n d i n f r a g m e n t s 9, 4 p u b l i s h e d b e f o r e u n d e r N o . 2075 (in v o l . X V I I ) a n d a n e w o n e f r o m t h e s a m e m a n u s c r i p t , a n d (11. 6 - 1 2 ) c o n t a i n e d in N o . 2482 (a m u c h - d a m a g e d s c r a p f r o m a roll of t h e l a t e s e c o n d c e n t u r y ) ; t h e y all a r e p u b l i s h e d t o g e t h e r w i t h a c o m m e n t a r y ( p p . 8 - 1 6 ) a n d l i n k e d w i t h e a c h o t h e r , w i t h t h e w e l l - k n o w n skill of P r o f e s s o r L o b e l , t o c o n s t i t u t e o n e c o l u m n of H e s i o d ' s Catalogue, r e l a t i n g t h e s t o r y of t h e f i r s t d a u g h t e r of T h e s t i u s , L e d a . T h e s e c o n d a n d t h e t h i r d c o l u m n s of N o . 2481 f r . 5(b) b r i n g r e s p e c t -i v e l y t h e s t o r y of t h e o t h e r t w o d a u g h t e r s of T h e s t -i u s , A l t h a e a a n d H y p e r m e s t r a (col. I I a n d t h e b e g i n n i n g of col. I l l ) a n d t h a t of t h e d e s c e n d e n t s of P o r t h a o n ' s d a u g h t e r , S t r a t o n i c e . N o . 2 4 8 3 : t w o f r a g m e n t s of t h e Catalogue in a n u n c i a l of t h e s e c o n d c e n t u r y ( f r . 2 c o m b i n e d w i t h N o . 2 4 8 1 f r . 5 b I I 1 1 - 1 8 ) c o n t a i n t h e s t o r y of C e y a n d A l c y o n e ( H e s . f r . 159 R z .2) ; t o t h e s a m e m a n u s c r i p t b e l o n g s also N o . 2490 (a n a r r o w s c r a p c o n t a i n i n g t h e b e g i n n i n g of t h e s t o r y of Coronis). N o . 2484 b r i n g s t w o s c r a p s ( t h e f i r s t h a l f of t h e s e c o n d c e n t u r y ) c o m b i n i n g w i t h N o . 2 4 8 1 f r . 1(a), (b) a n d N o . 2485 f r r . 1, 3 ; t h e r e s u l t — a n e w f r a g m e n t of t h e Catalogue r e l a t i n g t o t h e s t o r y of S a l m o n e u s a n d his d a u g h t e r T y r o — is p u b l i s h e d w i t h a c o m m e n t a r y o n p p . 2 2 - 2 6 . N o . 2486 ( f r o m t h e l a t t e r p a r t of t h e s e c o n d c e n t u r y ) is e d i t e d t o g e t h e r w i t h N o . 2485 f r . 2 g i v i n g u s o n e a l m o s t c o m p l e t e c o l u m n of t h e Catalogue w i t h t h e s t o r y of N e l e u s , his sons, t h e i r d e s c e n d e n t s a n d t h e f i g h t b e t w e e n P e r i c l y m e n e s a n d H e r a c l e s . N o . 2 4 8 7 : t w o f r a g m e n t s of a roll ( t h e t h i r d c e n t u r y ) , one c o n t a i n s t h e b e t t e r p a r t of a c o l u m n of t w e n t y - f i v e lines s u m m a r i z i n g t h e line of D a n a u s as f a r as P e r s e u s a n d t h e d a u g h t e r s of P r o e t u s (Catalogue). N o . 2 4 8 8 A : a s c r a p ( l a t e s e c o n d or e a r l y t h i r d c e n t u r y ) c o n t a i n i n g p a r t s of t h e f i r s t of t h r e e v e r s e s ( r e f e r r i n g t o t h e p u n i s h m e n t of t h e d a u g h t e r s of P r o e t u s ) q u o t e d f r o m H e s i o d ' s Catalogue ( H e s . f r . 29 Rz.2) a n d t h e t w o p r e -c e d i n g ones. N o . 2 4 8 8 В : is a f r a g m e n t of t h e Catalogue i n t h e s a m e h a n d as t h e p r e c e d i n g , c o n t a i n i n g t h e v e r s e s n e a r l y t h e s a m e a s t h o s e k n o w n f r o m Q ( P . P e t r . I 3, 3).

(5)

400

A. ŚWIDEREK

No. 2489 is a fragment of the second century, probably of the section of

Hesiod's Catalogue relating to Cyrene (schol. Pind. Pyth. IX 6 = Hes. fr. 128

Rz.

2

).

No. 2491 (4 scraps of the second century) and No. 2492 (the third century)

contain small fragments referring to the Suitors of Helen, out of Hesiod's

Cata-logue, partly overlapping G

3

and G

5

respectively.

No. 2493 is a fragment of the third century, tentatively identified by the

Editor as a fragment of Hesiod's Catalogue (11. 9-13 = F

4

, 29-33 = No. 2481

fr. 5b II 22-26).

No. 2494 A, from the early second century, is a manuscript containing

the begining of Hesiod' 'Ασπίς preceded by the παράδοσις of Hesiod's Catalogue.

No. 2494 В brings three scraps by the same hand as No. 2494 A, which may

have come from the Catalogue, but one of them (b) contains parts of verses

which recur in No. 2495 fr. 26; and the attribution of this fragment to the

Catalogue is very dubious.

No. 2495: 44 fragments -{-Addendum (early 2nd century), some very small,

the largest being frr. 21, 16 and 1; identified by the Editor as I. Κήϋκος γάμος,

II. a piece which recurs among fragments of No. 2494, III. a piece relating to

the wrath of Zeus at the killing of the Cyclopes, IV. a piece relating to the

story of Krisos and his brother, sons of Phocus: V. a piece containing the name

of Mestra and her father Aethon and introducing Sisyphus and his son; VI.

immediately following the beginning of a piece about the same two; according

to the Editor, all pieces are Hesiodic, and, except the Κήϋκος γάμος, fragments

of the Catalogue.

No. 2496 (4 fragments from the first century) and No. 2497 (first half of

the second century) are combined together with F

x

В to constitute probably

a part of the Catalogue.

No. 2498 is a small fragment, probably of the Μεγάλαι Ήοΐαι, written

in a „biblical" uncial on the back of a piece of a roll,' on its recto there are

parts of two columns of a prose work, perhaps of a catalogue of literary pieces.

No. 2499 is a very small scrap (2nd century) ascribed by the Editor

ten-tatively to the Μεγάλαι Ήοΐαι..

Under No. 2500 we find a narrow and damaged strip of a roll containing

the right-hand parts of verses, identified as Hesiodic by the Editor who

sug-gests Μελαμποδόα as its source. 1

No. 2501 is perhaps a fragment of the Catalogue, written on the back of

a document from the third century (the literary text from the second century?).

No. 2502 brings a fragment, which could be assigned to the Catalogue,

containing part of a pedigree, perhaps concerning a daughter of Pelops; from

the first century.

No. 2503 is a fragment from the early second century which preserves

a piece of genealogical narrative similar to other pieces known to have been

(6)

included in Hesiod's Catalogue, but the details seem to be completely unattested

and found nowhere else (e.g. the story of the marriage of Dardanus with the

daughter of Broteas who bore him Pandion and a daughter).

No. 2504 is a scrap of a roll, from the early second century, with parts of

the verses found in H (H 90-92).

No. 2505 is a small fragment (3rd or 4th century) containing some elements

resembling those found in Hesiodic pedigrees.

An Epimetrum added at the end gives the lectures and some observations

of Professor L o b e 1 concerning the coincidence of PSI 1383 and P. Yale

1273.

The study of the prestidigator's work of Professor L o b e 1 is in Hèsiod's

volume encumbered by the complicated numbering of the texts, so that at

times it would be easy to get lost but for the systematic Table of the Papyri.

Volume XXVII, containing both literary texts and documents, is above

all the work of Professor E.G. T u r n e r assisted by Doctor J . R e a, two

documents being published by the papyrologists from abroad, Doctor L.

К о e η e η (No. 2474) and Doctor J. M

a

F. Ρ о m a r (No. 2480).

Among 15 new classical texts the first two numbers (2452 and 2453) bring

new fragments of Sophocles. Under No. 2452 there are published 86 fragments

(from the late second century), only seven of them reaching a moderate size,

from a roll containing a play about the exploits of Theseus in Crete; the

author-ship of Sophocles is proven upon stylistic evidence.

No. 2453 brings new fragments (frr. 38-64) written by the same hands and

belonging probably to the same manuscript as P. Oxy 1083; in fr. 14 Polyidos

speaks the words which might be expected of him at the moment of his release

from prison in a chest according to Hyg. Fab. 136 and Apollod. I l l 3 17 ff;

the fragments of No. 2453 as well as those of No. 1083 come without doubt

from one or more rolls containing different plays (both satyr plays and tragedies,

probably of Sophocles) written by the same scribe from the second century

(Professor T u r n e r disagrees with S с h u b a г t's assignment of this hand

to the first century).

No. 2454 is a fragment of a stately roll from the second century, out of

which parts of two columns survive (each of 30 lines) ; they contain a monologue

(in iambic trimeters) of Heracles comparing his present wretchedness with his

glorious past exploits; an Aeschylean or an hellenistic tragedy? the arguments

in favour of the latter seem to be more convincing.

The same Editor gives under No. 2455 a masterful reconstitution of a roll,

from the early second century, containing some hypotheses to Euripides'plays.

The titles of the plays with initials M and O, and initials from Σ to X can be

identified. From Τ to the end of the alphabet the list is complete serving as

a kind of an ancient catalogue of Euripides' works (among others it proves

(7)

402

A. ŚWIDEREK

the existence of two Phrixos plays). The plays are listed in alphabetical order,

each hypothesis being introduced by its title, succeeded by the formula οΰ

(or ής or ών) άρχή, followed by the citation of the first verse and the phrase

ή δ' ύπό&εσι,ς, set out as the heading.

No. 2456 is a fragment exhibiting the final column of a list of Euripides'plays,

set out in alphabetical order of the initial letters, written on the verso of a tax

register from the early or middle second century.

No. 2457 is a narrow strip, with the tax-register (from the end of the first

or the beginning of the second century) on the recto, on the verso containing

the lower portion of a column of hypotheses of Euripides'plays: a few letters

from each line form the conclusion of a hypothesis to Alcestis followed by

nearly the full width of the lines from the hypothesis to Aeolus (it adds to our

knowledge of this play a new scene, in which the sons of Aeolus are set by

their father to ballot for their sisters as wiwes, Macareus failing in the ballot

to win his favourite sister). The papyrus confirms the dependence on

Euripi-des'play of the notices about Aeolus found in Sostratus' Etruscan history (apud

Stob. 64, 35) and in Ps. Plutarch. 312 c, at the same time the arrangement

of this series of hypotheses into the second century B. C.

One larger (fr. 1) and five small fragments of a roll, (3rd century), assigned

to the Cresphontes of Euripides, are published under No. 2458. Fr. 1 consists

of the parts of the three consecutive columns, the central one containing about

16 lines of a stichomythic dialogue being probably a second portion of the

prologue (Cresphontes returns home unknown to his mother Merope?); the

third column containing only the opening words of trimeters, by its contents

seems far removed from the second column (Merope planning to kill her son?).

The other fragments are also difficult to fit into the story. Professor Turner

suggestion (supported by the presence of the dramatic sigla in the margin)

implies that we have here fragments not of the complete play, but of some

extracts only constituing an acting copy, used for a production in the theatre

of Oxyrhynchus.

No. 2459: five fragments (from the fourth century), identified as a part

of Euripides' Oedipus by the coincidence with Eur. fr. 540 and Fr. adespot.

541; in fr. 1 (ends of iambic trimeters) a speaker describes the Sphinx, in fr. 2

(only middle portions of iambic trimeters) perhaps the same speaker tells how

she propounded her riddle.

No. 2460 was already published separately by E. W. Handley and J . Rea

in „The Telephus of Euripides" (Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies

of London University, Supplement No. 5, 1957). It consists of 51 fragments

of a roll (late first century), used primarly for a tax-register, of which the

co-lumn numbers and general features have helped in fixing the relative position

of some of the fragments. The identification of the text as the Telephus of

Euripides depends on the coincidence fr. 32 = 716 N

2

, and frr. 18, 19, 20 (and

(8)

perhaps 17?) with P. Berol. 9908 (BKT У 2 p. 64) wrongly assigned by the

first editor to Sophocles' Gathering of Achaeans.

No. 2461 brings five fragments from the middle of the second century,

of which the largest one (fr. 1) contains the middle portions of iambic trimeters

being a stichomythic dialogue in which a questioner elicits a description of the

Minotaur. The occurence of Eur. fr. 997 confirms the author as Euripides;

the play might be the Cretes, but the Theseus seems more likely to the Editor.

No. 2462 is a scrap, on the recto of which there are parts of ten lines from

a land-register from the first or early second century; on the verso is the be.

ginning of a list of plays of Menander, in alphabetical order, assigned by the

Editor to the first half of the second century. The two versions of 'Αδελφοί

and the title 'Αχαιοί with a hitherto unknown alternative Πελοπο(ννήσι.θ'.)

are confirmed as Menander's plays.

Tbe text of No. 2463 (a single column) is written on the verso of a tax

register from the second century. The damaged beginning is followed by the

text which draws upon Rhianus of Bene and Aristophanes of Thebes for

in-formation on the legend of Poimandrus, a Boeotian hero who founded Tanagra

and killed one of his sons. The most probable supposition seems to be that

we have here a commentary on a poetic text, perhaps on Lycophron Alexandra

11. 326 ff (Theon of Alexandria?) or on some Boeotian poet (Hesiod, Pindar,

or rather Corinna?).

No. 2464: 4 fragments from the third century, the largest of them (fr. 1)

containing three narrow columns: the other three scraps fit together into

a composite fragment, not joining the largest but containing the ends of its

second and third columns. The text is a speach from the Attic law-courts,

technically concerned with the prosecution of a guardian but actually with

the decision who should inherit an estate; perhaps Hypereides, Προς τήν

τοΰ Δημέου παραγραφήν.

No. 2465 brings 22 fragments from the second century (three of them of

moderate size: frr. 1 — exhibiting parts of at least sevent columns from

Sa-tyrus' treatise περί των της 'Αλεξανδρείας δήμων, the identification being

confirmed by the coincidence of a considerable part of fr. 1 со. II with a

citat-ion in Theophilus, ad Autolyc. II 94 (Müller, FGH III pp. 164-5; cf. Jacoby,

Fr. Gr. Hist. III С No. 631). Fr. 1 II 3 and fr. 11 explain the names of

parti-cular tribes and demes; fr. 2 I cites regulations for a procession and for private

sacrifices to Arsinoe Philadelphos. Very important for the constitutional history

of Alexandria is the mention of prytaneis in an official document, originated

certainly in the first half of the third century B.C. (fr. 2 I 8). Fr. 3 offers

de-finite evidence of the connection between the Egyptian Eleusis and that in

Attica. The text shows Satyrus as a serious historian of Alexandria, and it

seems to allow us to bring the date of composition of his work down to the

reign of Epiphanes.

(9)

404 A. ŚWIDEREK

U n d e r N o . 2466 we f i n d a prosaic t e x t , c o m p o s e d of six f r a g m e n t s (3rd c e n t u r y ) , comprising t w e n t y eight lines of one c o l u m n . I t seems t o be s o m e historical m a t t e r , b u t it is n o t impossible t o see in it a f r a g m e n t of a novel or a l i t e r a r y l e t t e r . I t is a description of some f o r m of guerilla w a r f a r e b e t w e e n t h e E g y p t i a n s a n d t h e i n v a d i n g A r a b s : t h e l e a d e r of t h e l a t t e r being n a m e d Webelis (Ούέβηλις).

W i t h No. 2467 (two s c r a p s c o n t a i n i n g t h e ends of lines of M e n a n d e r , Dysco-lus, f r o m t h e l a t e second c e n t u r y ) begin t h e e x t a n t classical t e x t s , which b r i n g f u r t h e r on t h r e e f r a g m e n t s of P l a t o , Politicus, f r o m t h e second c e n t u r y (No. 2468) a n d t h e f o u r closely f i t t i n g f r a g m e n t s , f r o m t h e second c e n t u r y , of t h e h i s t o r y of A r i s t o d e m u s (No. 2469) w h i c h gives a s h o r t e n e d version of t h e t e x t preser-v e d in t h e P a r i s m a n u s c r i p t (cf. F . J a c o b y , F r . Gr. H i s t . I I A N o . 104, I I С» p p . 319 ff.).

T h e Nos. 2471-2480 are t h e d o c u m e n t s of t h e R o m a n a n d B y z a n t i n e periods, p r e c e d e d b y No. 2470, a lively coloured d r a w i n g of a n a t h l e t e (swinging o n a t r a p e z e ? ) a n d a b e a r , f o u n d a m i d t h i r d c e n t u r y d o c u m e n t s .

A m o n g t h e d o c u m e n t s No. 2471 concerns t h e r e p a y m e n t of a loan m a d e t o a c e r t a i n Cliaeremon A . D . 49 b y t h e b r o t h e r s a n d b a n k e r s D e m e t r i u s a n d Isidorus, b o t h R o m a n citizens a n d a n A l e x a n d r i a n , D e m e t r i u s , priest, g y m -n a z i a r c h a -n d o-ne of t h e -n u m b e r of those w h o were i m m u -n e f r o m t a x e s a -n d m a i n t a i n e d in t h e Mouseion a t A l e x a n d r i a . No. 2472 is a r e p o r t s u b m i t t e d t o S a r a p i o n , s t r a t e g u s of t h e L y c o p o l i t e n o m e in A . D . 119, b y έπιτηρηταί of t h e f o u r t h y e a r of H a d r i a n in c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h τελώναι of t h e t h i r d , c o n t a i n i n g an a c c o u n t for a f i v e p e r i o d of t h e p r o -ceeds of a t a x (τέλος έρμηνίας). No. 2473 is a p e t i t i o n , d a t e d 11-th S e p t e m b e r A . D . 229, addressed b y Aurelius Ptollion a n d Aurelius Apion t o t h e s t r a t e g u s of O x y r h y n c h u s , re-q u e s t i n g h i m t o i n s t r u c t t h e keepers of t h e local p r o p e r t y registers (βιβλιο-φύλακες έγκτήσεων) t o m a k e an e n t r y in t h e i r books r e c o r d i n g a sale of s o m e cleruchic l a n d , b o u g h t b y t h e m in t h e n e i g h b o r h o o d of t h e village of A n t i -p e r a Pela in t h e O x y r h y n c h i t e n o m e .

No. 2474 is a d r a f t of a will of a w e a l t h y R o m a n citizen ( p e r h a p s a Christian), e n f r a n c h i s e d A . D . 212, f r o m t h e t h i r d c e n t u r y ( p r o b a b l y n o t m u c h l a t e r t h a n 240). U n d e r Nos. 2475-2477 t h e r e are published t h r e e d o c u m e n t s concerning t h e privileges of a t h l e t e s a n d Dionysiac artists, which f o r m e d p a r t of a τόμος συγκολλήσιμος in t h e a r c h i v e s of t h e O x y r h n y c h i t e s e n a t e . T h e b e s t p r e s e r v e d N o . 2476 is a c e r t i f i c a t e d e m o n s t r a t i n g t h a t Aurelius H a r t r e s is a m e m b e r of t h e ιερά μουσική οικουμενική περιπολιστική σύνοδος των περί τον Διόνυσον τεχνιτών including copies of imperial l e t t e r s a n d decrees conferring on t h e c o m m u n i t y e x e m p t i o n f r o m t a x e s a n d liturgies.

No. 2478 is a deed of s u r e t y , f r o m A . D . 595 or 596, a d d r e s s e d t o F l a v i u s A p i o n I I I b y Z a c h a r i a s , s t e w a r d of a Christian c h u r c h in O x y r h y n c h u s , w h o

(10)

g u a r a n t e e s t h e presence on his f r u i t f a r m of Aurelius P a m b e c h i u s , colonus on t h e A p i o n e s t a t e .

N o . 2479, f r o m t h e s i x t h c e n t u r y , is a p e t i t i o n f r o m a r u n a w a y colonus t o his p a t r o n ( p r o b a b l y one of t h e A p i o n f a m i l y ) begging t o be r e s t o r e d t o his f a r m w i t h o u t p a y i n g t h e r e n t on t h e l a n d which he h a d n o t tilled d u r i n g h i s absence.

N o . 2480 is a long a c c o u n t for t h e crop of wine, consisting of t h e f i v e kol-l e m a t a of a p a p y r u s rokol-lkol-l, d a t e d p r o b a b kol-l y A . D . 5 6 5 - 6 .

All t h r e e v o l u m e s of t h e O x y r h y n c h u s P a p y r i , are, according t o t h e long t r a d i t i o n , p r o v i d e d w i t h t h e e x h a u s t i n g indices a n d t h e splendid p l a t e s ( t h o u g h o n e could only r e g r e t t h a t t h e y a l m o s t n e v e r show t h e d o c u m e n t s ) . All t h r e e a p p e a r e d in all t h e i r s p l e n d o u r d u r i n g t w o y e a r s 1961 a n d 1962. T h e y m a n i f e s t n o t only t h e i n c o m p a r a b l e skill b u t also t h e i n d e f a t i g a b l e i n d u s t r i o u s n e s s of t h e i r E d i t o r s .

The Archive of Aurelius Isidorus in the Egyptian Museum, Cairo, a n d t h e Univ e r s i t y of Michigan ( P . Cair. Isidor.) edited b y A r t h u r E . R . В о а к, H e r -b e r t C h a y y i m Υ o u t i e. A n n A r -b o r , t h e U n i v e r s i t y of Michigan Press, 1960.

T h e papyrological evidence being in general v e r y h a p h a z a r d , t h e m o r e p r e c i o u s are all sets of d o c u m e n t s a n d archives. T h e Archive of Aurelius Isi-d o r u s , is well k n o w n a l r e a Isi-d y f r o m m a n y f r a g m e n t a r y publications, b e g i n n i n g w i t h 1933. W e are still m o r e t h a n k f u l t o t h e E d i t o r s f o r p r e s e n t i n g us n o w w i t h t h e whole of it (including s i x t y t w o d o c u m e n t s reedited a n d e i g h t y seven h i t h e r t o u n p u b l i s h e d ) in t h e new v o l u m e of t h e U n i v e r s i t y of Michigan Press.

T h e I n t r o d u c t i o n (pp. 3-20) t r e a t s in s e p a r a t e c h a p t e r s (I) t h e genealogy of I s i d o r u s a n d his f a m i l y (p. 6) p i c t u r i n g t h e f a m i l y connections of I s i d o r u s ; (II) I s i d o r u s as l a n d h o l d e r a n d t e n a n t ; ( I I I ) liturgies of Isidorus (ten liturgical offices in t h e course of t w e n t y years, 298/9 t o 318/9); t h e E d i t o r s conclude t h a t t h e d o c u m e n t s r e l a t i n g t o I s i d o r u s himself cover t h e y e a r s of his y o u n g m a n h o o d a n d m a t u r i t y f r o m 291 t o 324, b u t t h e y do n o t t r a n s m i t t h e full record of his a c t i v i t é s over t h i s p e r i o d ; t h e y reveal h i m only in his relations w i t h village, n o m e , a n d p r o v i n c i a l a u t h o r i t i e s , in t h e p e r f o r m a n c e of liturgical service, in his d o u b l e role as p r o p r i e t o r a n d t e n a n t , a n d as t h e v i c t i m of aggresion b y m o r e i n f l u e n t i a l villagers. T h e f o u r t h a n d l a s t c h a p t e r of t h e I n t r o d u c t i o n deals w i t h t h e d a t e of t h e revolt of Lucius D o m i t i u s D o m i t i a n u s , w h o w a s recognized a t K a r a n i s a t least f r o m t h e l a s t week of A u g u s t u n t i l N o v e m b e r 23 of t h e s a m e y e a r 2 9 6 ; Lucius D o m i t i u s D o m i t i a n u s , k n o w n f r o m p a p y r i a n d coins, b e i n g n o t identical w i t h t h e corrector Aurelius Achilles, k n o w n f r o m t h e l i t e r a r y sources.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Wydaje się to konieczne, ponieważ organizacje publiczne, w tym miasta, mają cechy, które utrudniają wdrażanie zmian, stąd niezbędne jest poszukiwanie zdolności dynamicznych

Ale także być może, że Stefania została pochowana w grobowcu rodziny Rzewuskich herbu Krzywda, znajdującym się tuż za grobowcem Lemańskich, przy zachodniej granicy

Both Kurzel’s landscape and his emphasis on the motif of children and violence open up the film to more radical readings and situate this version of Macbeth quite firmly in the

These interspecific differences might be attributed to lim- ited opportunity, rather than the lack of the effect of body size: as the hawfinch was the largest and the goldfinch

Jeżeli zmienna niezależna, powiedzm y X 2, jest istotnie skorelowana z У w kroku pierwszym, lecz nie jest skorelowana naj- silniej i korelacja ta znika lub co

Ludność wilajetów irackich składała się też z różnych narodow ości i grup wyznaniowych.. W ażną rolę odgrywał przy tym fakt, że zarów no mniejszości

Badania były kontynuacją prac związanych z weryfikacją badań z lat 1936-1938 oraz rozpozna- niem reliktów mało znanego zamku z 1 połowy XVI w., powstałego w 1518 r.. z

Przedmiotem badań były: obszar rynku miasta lokacyjnego (od pół. XIII do XVIII w.) oraz przed- państwowej (VII/VIII-X w.) osady przygrodowej, a od X_do poł. XIII wieku teren