Tomasz Sowiński
Institute of Physics of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Mass-imbalanced mixtures
of several ultra-cold fermions
in one-dimensional traps
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
the group
PostDocs
•
Marcin Płodzień
•
Elnaz Darsheshda
PhD Students
•
Daniel Pęcak
•
Jacek Dobrzyniecki
•
?? (open 2017)
•
?? (open 2018)
Mentors (distinguished professors)
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
motivation
6
Li
Atomic number (Z) 3
Nucleons (Z+N) 6
Total electronic spin (S) 1/2 Total nuclear spin (I) 1
Hyperfine states (F=S+I) 1/2 or 3/2
| "i = |F = 3/2, mF = 3/2i
| #i = |F = 1/2, mF = 1/2i
message from experiments
• two flavors of spinless fermions
• well controlled number of particles
• one-dimensional confinement
• strong interactions between flavors
…what for???
• extreme control on the system
• extreme precision of measurements
• from ’one' to 'many' crossover
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
motivation
6
Li
Atomic number (Z) 3
Nucleons (Z+N) 6
Total electronic spin (S) 1/2 Total nuclear spin (I) 1
Hyperfine states (F=S+I) 1/2 or 3/2
| "i = |F = 3/2, mF = 3/2i
| #i = |F = 1/2, mF = 1/2i
message from experiments
• two flavors of spinless fermions
• well controlled number of particles
• one-dimensional confinement
• strong interactions between flavors
…what for???
• extreme control on the system
• extreme precision of measurements
• from ’one' to 'many' crossover
m " /m # 6= 1
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
message from experiments
Figure from S. Jochim’s group paper
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
the model
(anti-)commutation relations
n (x), ˆˆ † (x0)o
= (x x0) n (x), ˆˆ (x0)o
= 0
h ˆ"(x), ˆ †#(x0)i
= 0 h ˆ
"(x), ˆ #(x0)i
= 0
• the same spins • opposite spins
• two distinguishable flavors of fermions (↑ and ↓)
• both flavors may have different masses
• both flavors confined in one-dimensional trap
• opposite spins do interact via sort range δ-like potential
H = ˆ X Z
dx ˆ
†(x)
~
22m
d
2dx
2+ V (x) ˆ (x)
+ g
Z
dx ˆ
†#(x) ˆ
†"(x) ˆ
"(x) ˆ
#(x)
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
the model
(anti-)commutation relations
n (x), ˆˆ † (x0)o
= (x x0) n (x), ˆˆ (x0)o
= 0
h ˆ"(x), ˆ †#(x0)i
= 0 h ˆ
"(x), ˆ #(x0)i
= 0
• the same spins • opposite spins
H = ˆ X Z
dx ˆ
†(x)
~
22m
d
2dx
2+ V (x) ˆ (x)
+ g
Z
dx ˆ
†#(x) ˆ
†"(x) ˆ
"(x) ˆ
#(x)
numerical method
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
the model
(anti-)commutation relations
n (x), ˆˆ † (x0)o
= (x x0) n (x), ˆˆ (x0)o
= 0
h ˆ"(x), ˆ †#(x0)i
= 0 h ˆ
"(x), ˆ #(x0)i
= 0
• the same spins • opposite spins
h N ˆ
", ˆ H i
= h
N ˆ
#, ˆ H i
= 0
conservation of the number of fermions
N = ˆ
Z
dx ˆ
†(x) ˆ (x)
H = ˆ X Z
dx ˆ
†(x)
~
22m
d
2dx
2+ V (x) ˆ (x)
+ g
Z
dx ˆ
†#(x) ˆ
†"(x) ˆ
"(x) ˆ
#(x)
numerical method
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
numerical method
H = ˆ X Z
dx ˆ
†(x)
~
22m
d
2dx
2+ V (x) ˆ (x)
+ g
Z
dx ˆ
†#(x) ˆ
†"(x) ˆ
"(x) ˆ
#(x)
the model
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
numerical method
• we fix the number of fermions N↑ and N↓
• we decompose the field operators in the single-particle basis
(x) = ˆ
X
Mn=1
ˆ
a
n n(x)
• we calculate all matrix elements of the Hamiltonian
• we perform an exact diagonalization
H = ˆ X Z
dx ˆ
†(x)
~
22m
d
2dx
2+ V (x) ˆ (x)
+ g
Z
dx ˆ
†#(x) ˆ
†"(x) ˆ
"(x) ˆ
#(x)
~2 2m
d2
dx2 + V (x) n(x) = E i n(x)
the model
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
N↑ dim(H) #of non-zero
elements sparsity
1 144 10 512 0.51
2 4 356 1 058 580 5.6•10-2 3 48 400 21 835 600 9.3•10-3 4 245 025 159 167 025 2.7•10-3
N
↑=N
↓M = 12
numerical complexity
harmonic
confinement
~
22m
d
2dx
2+ m ⌦
22 x
2 n(x) = E
i n(x)
Natural units:
Energy : ~⌦
Length :
r ~
m ⌦
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
equal mass system
T. Sowiński, T. Grass, O. Dutta, M. Lewenstein Phys. Rev. A 88 033607 (2013)
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
equal mass system
0 1
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
g = 0.1
Density
0 1 2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
Position (osc. u.)
Density
0 1
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
g = 1
0 1 2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 Position (osc. u.)
0 1
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
g = 10
µ=1
0 1 2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
Position (osc. u.)
µ=40/6
⇢ (x) = hG| ˆ
†(x) ˆ (x) |Gi
E. Lindgren et al.
New J. Phys. 16 063003 (2014)
Single-particle density profile in the ground-state
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
N
↑=3
N
↓=1
different mass fermions
D. Pęcak, M. Gajda, T. Sowiński New J. Phys. 18 013030 (2016)
m
"/m
#= 40/6
m
"/m
#= 1
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
different mass fermions
Single-particle density profile in the ground-state
⇢ (x) = hG| ˆ
†(x) ˆ (x) |Gi
D. Pęcak, M. Gajda, T. Sowiński New J. Phys. 18 013030 (2016)
0 1
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
g = 0.1
Density
0 1 2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
Position (osc. u.)
Density
0 1
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
g = 1
0 1 2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 Position (osc. u.)
0 1
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
g = 10
µ=1
0 1 2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
Position (osc. u.)
µ=40/6
N
↑=3
N
↓=1
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
D. Pęcak, M. Gajda, T. Sowiński New J. Phys. 18 013030 (2016)
0 0.5 1 1.5
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
N↑=1 N↓=2
Density
0 1 2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
N↑=2 N↓=1
Density
0 1 2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
N↑=3 N↓=1
Density
0 1 2
−5−4−3−2−1 0 1 2 3 4 5
N↑=1 N↓=9
Position (osc. u.)
Density
0 0.5 1 1.5
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
N↑=1 N↓=3
0 1 2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
N↑=2 N↓=2
0 1 2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
N↑=3 N↓=2
0 1 2 3
−5−4−3−2−1 0 1 2 3 4 5
N↑=5 N↓=5
Position (osc. u.)
0 0.5 1 1.5
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
N↑=1 N↓=4
0 1 2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
N↑=2 N↓=3
0 1 2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
N↑=4 N↓=1
0 1 2 3 4
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
N↑=9 N↓=1
Position (osc. u.)
different mass fermions
Separation in the lighter component
rectangular
box
Natural units:
V (x) =
⇢ 0 if |x| < L
1 if |x| > L,
Energy : ~
2⇡
28m L
2Length : L
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
D. Pęcak, T. Sowiński Phys. Rev. A 94 042118 (2016)
different mass fermions
Separation in the heavier component
Uniform Box
0 0.5 1 1.5
-4 -2 0 2 4
N↑=1 N↓=2
Density
0 0.5 1 1.5
-4 -2 0 2 4
N↑=2 N↓=1
Density
0 0.5 1 1.5
-4 -2 0 2 4
N↑=1 N↓=3
Density
0 0.5 1 1.5
-4 -2 0 2 4
N↑=1 N↓=6
Position
Density
0 0.5 1 1.5
-4 -2 0 2 4
N↑=2 N↓=2
0 0.5 1 1.5
-4 -2 0 2 4
N↑=3 N↓=1
0 0.5 1 1.5
-4 -2 0 2 4
N↑=1 N↓=4
0 0.5 1 1.5
-4 -2 0 2 4
N↑=3 N↓=4
Position
0 0.5 1 1.5
-4 -2 0 2 4
N↑=2 N↓=3
0 0.5 1 1.5
-4 -2 0 2 4
N↑=3 N↓=2
0 0.5 1 1.5
-4 -2 0 2 4
N↑=4 N↓=1
0 0.5 1 1.5
-4 -2 0 2 4
N↑=6 N↓=1
Position
the transition
V (x, ) =
⇢
12
m ⌦
2x
2if |x| < L
1 if |x| > L,
0 0.2 0.4
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 λ = 0
V σ/(m σω2 L2 )
0 0.2 0.4
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 λ = 0.5
Position x/L V σ/(m σω2 L2 )
0 0.2 0.4
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 λ = 0.25
0 0.2 0.4
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 λ = 1
Position x/L
the transition
V (x, ) =
⇢
12
m ⌦
2x
2if |x| < L
1 if |x| > L,
0 0.2 0.4
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 λ = 0
V σ/(m σω2 L2 )
0 0.2 0.4
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 λ = 0.5
Position x/L V σ/(m σω2 L2 )
0 0.2 0.4
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 λ = 0.25
0 0.2 0.4
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 λ = 1
Position x/L 0
0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
µ = 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Position
Density
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0
µ = 40/6
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0.0057
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 1
Position
1
0
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
„order” parameter
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
µ = 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Position
Density
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0
µ = 40/6
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0.0057
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 1
Position
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
µ = 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Position
Density
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0
µ = 40/6
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0.0057
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 1
Position
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
„order” parameter
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
µ = 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Position
Density
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0
µ = 40/6
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0.0057
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 1
Position
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
µ = 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Position
Density
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0
µ = 40/6
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0.0057
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 1
Position
0 1
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
„order” parameter
M(x) = ⇢
"(x) ⇢
#(x)
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
µ = 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Position
Density
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0
µ = 40/6
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0.0057
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 1
Position
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
µ = 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Position
Density
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0
µ = 40/6
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0.0057
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 1
Position
Magnetization-like distribution
0 1
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
„order” parameter
M(x) = ⇢
"(x) ⇢
#(x)
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
µ = 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Position
Density
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0
µ = 40/6
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0.0057
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 1
Position
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
µ = 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Position
Density
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0
µ = 40/6
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0.0057
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 1
Position
Magnetization-like distribution
0 1
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
„order” parameter
M(x) = ⇢
"(x) ⇢
#(x)
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
µ = 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Position
Density
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0
µ = 40/6
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0.0057
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 1
Position
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
µ = 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Position
Density
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0
µ = 40/6
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0.0057
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 1
Position
Magnetization-like distribution
… and its second-moment
=
Z
LL
dx x
2M(x)
0 1
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
„order” parameter
M(x) = ⇢
"(x) ⇢
#(x)
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
µ = 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Position
Density
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0
µ = 40/6
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0.0057
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 1
Position
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
µ = 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Density
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
Position
Density
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0
µ = 40/6
0 0.3 0.6 0.9
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 0.0057
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
-4 -2 0 2 4
λ = 1
Position
Magnetization-like distribution
… and its second-moment
=
Z
LL
dx x
2M(x)
g red > g blue
0 1
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
-10
-7
-4
-1
0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1
10 2 λ
σ
N ↑ =1
N ↓ =3
4.0 4.2
4.4 4.6
4.8 5.0
-12
-6
0
6
0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1
10 2 λ
σ
N ↑ =2
N ↓ =3
4.0 4.2
4.4 4.6
4.8 5.0
-8
-4
0
4
8
12
0.3 0.42 0.54 0.66
10 2 λ
σ
N ↑ =2
N ↓ =2
4.0 4.2
4.4 4.6
4.8 5.0
-6
0
6
12
0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9
10 2 λ
σ
N ↑ =3
N ↓ =2
4.0 4.2
4.4 4.6
4.8 5.0
6
9
12
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
10 2 λ
σ
N ↑ =3
N ↓ =1
4.0 4.2
4.4 4.6
4.8 5.0
-15
-12
-9
-6
-3
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1
10 2 λ
σ
N ↑ =1
N ↓ =4
„order” parameter
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
-10 -7 -4 -1
0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 102 λ
σ
N↑=1 N↓=3
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
-12 -6 0 6
0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 102 λ
σ
N↑=2 N↓=3
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
-8 -4 0 4 8 12
0.3 0.42 0.54 0.66 102 λ
σ
N↑=2 N↓=2
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
-6 0 6 12
0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 102 λ
σ
N↑=3 N↓=2
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
6 9 12
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 102 λ
σ
N↑=3 N↓=1
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
-15 -12 -9 -6 -3
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 102 λ
σ
N↑=1 N↓=4
„order” parameter
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
the susceptibility
( ) = d ( )
d
A response of the order
parameter to changes of the
control parameter
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
the susceptibility
0 15 30 45 60 75
0.2 0.5 0.8 1.1
χ
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
0 100 200 300 400
0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65
χ
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
0 30 60 90
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
102 λ
χ
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
0 2 4 6
-8 -6 -4 -2 0
g-γ/ν χ
λc = 0.0097 γ = 0.53 ν = 0.39
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
0 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12
-120 -60 0 60 120
g-γ/ν χ
λc = 0.0054 γ = 0.23 ν = 0.05
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
0 1 2 3 4
-20 0 20 40 60 80
g1/γ τ
g-γ/ν χ
λc = 0.0029 γ = 0.33 ν = 0.17
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
-10 -7 -4 -1
-8 -6 -4 -2 0
σ N ↓=3, N ↑=1
γ = 0.53 λc = 0.0097
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
-8 -4 0 4 8 12
-120 -60 0 60 120
σ N ↓=2, N ↑=2
γ = 0.23 λc = 0.0054
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
6 9 12
-20 0 20 40 60 80
g1/γ τ
σ N ↓=1, N ↑=3
γ = 0.29 λc = 0.0033
4.04.2 4.44.6 4.85.0
N↑=3 N↓=1N↑=2 N↓=2N↑=1 N↓=3
( ) = d ( )
d
A response of the order
parameter to changes of the
control parameter
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
the hypothesis
In the limit of infinitely strong
interactions the system undergoes
a non-analytic transition
between the two orderings.
The transition is driven
by an adiabatic change
of the external confinement.
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
scaling hypothesis
(⌧, g) = g /⌫ ˜(g 1/⌫ ⌧ )
⌧ =
cc
c
Critical shape of the trap
Dimensionless distance to the critical point
Scaling ansatz
There exists an appropriate choice of critical
exponents for which all numerical data points
form the unique universal curve
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
finite-size scaling
(⌧, g) = g
/⌫˜(g
1/⌫⌧ )
FEW-BODY PROBLEMS THEORY GROUP
conclusions
The system:
1. of a few fermions of different masses
2. in the limit of infinitely strong repulsions
3. in a one-dimensional confinement
undergoes
a non-analytic transition between the
two orderings of the density profile
D. Pęcak, M. Gajda, T. Sowiński New J. Phys. 18 013030 (2016)
D. Pęcak, T. Sowiński Phys. Rev. A 94 042118 (2016) T. Sowiński, T. Grass, O. Dutta, M. Lewenstein
Phys. Rev. A 88 033607 (2013) D. Pęcak, M. Gajda, T. Sowiński
ArXiv:1703.08116