• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Appendix 1. Innovation Scorecard Metrics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Appendix 1. Innovation Scorecard Metrics "

Copied!
2
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Appendix 1. Innovation Scorecard Metrics

Gate 1 Gate 2 Gate 3 Gate 4

Inputs

Funding availability

Individual networking skills Number of incoming proposals Number of patents or prototypes Number of, and time between, collection activities focused on specific external stakeholders Percentage of R&D budget that is non-internal

Market and technology research resources

Objectives for innovation efforts clearly communicated to senior managers and employees Quality of it infrastructure Success of ideas passing through selection and execution processes

Budget allocation to innovative activities

Number of competence are that are mastered within the team Project resources (effort, budget, etc.)

Share of prototype construction which can be reused directly in normal product development

Budget percent allocated to innovation effort

Percentage of innovation projects outsourced

Product uniqueness

Success of ideas passing through selection and execution processes Time dedicated to innovation

Process

Innovation and creativity workshops

Number of projects based on ideas from stakeholders Number of workshops with customers on future needs Participation of suppliers in stage gate process

Quality of development innovation process

Alignment between innovation strategy and resource allocation Number of

terminated/unsuccessful projects Percentage of innovation efforts devoted to radical, semi-radical, and incremental innovation Product platform effectiveness

Involvement in the innovation processes

Lead time per project Level of coordination among R&D, marketing and production units

Share of budget on outsourced projects

Subjective assessment of the benefit of each process change

New product acceptance rate Number of gateway returns Percentage of innovation projects that respect the cost and outputs planned

Portfolio balanced over time, returns, risk, and technologies Product and process quality score

(2)

Appendix 1. Innovation Scorecard Metrics (continued)

Gate 1 Gate 2 Gate 3 Gate 4

Outputs

Employee suggestions

Funds committed to innovation Improvement in knowledge stock Investment in new projects Map of upcoming innovations to the market

Percentage of growth covered by innovation

Quality of ideas funded

Estimated lead time to market launch of project results

Potential loss (alternative cost) of not selecting a project (worst-case scenario)

R&D productivity

Ratio of short-term and long-term projects

Residual income growth Sales growth

Average development cycle time stages

Degree of match between the resources deployed and R&D results achieved

Number of implemented process improvement proposals

R&D expenses as percentage of sales

Achievement of quality and time objectives

Customer acceptance Market share growth

Percentage of sales from new product

R&D efficiency (time to market) Sales growth

Outcomes

Actual versus budgeted costs for planning and knowledge

management

Elapsed time from proposal to feedback

Expected sales from

incremental/radical innovations against competitors

Percentage of sales from ideas originated outside

Customer satisfaction with innovation activities

Frequency of repeat customers Market share

New customers gained through innovation

Number of new product and service lines introduced

Average cost of each finished project

CAPEX/OPEX

Monetary rewards for achieved personal and group goals achieved

Monetary rewards for patent proposals

Optimization of the use of capital (human and material)

Customer profitability

New customers gained through innovation

Number of new product and service lines introduced R&D value creation in commercialisation stages Return on capital employed Turnover from and to R&D units

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

The heterochromatic number of an r-graph H = (V, E) (hypergraph whose edges are sets of size r) is the minimum number k such that each vertex colouring of H using exactly k

We say that a string is factor-maximal iff it contains the largest number of distinct factors among strings of the same length and over the same alphabet.. We show a family of

But all such results contain some restrictions on (X, M, N ) and the number of terms is relatively large; this is not convenient in applications.. Our result (see Theorem 2

For any set X let |X| denote its cardinality and for any integer n, larger than one, let ω(n) denote the number of distinct prime factors of n and let P (n) denote the greatest

For t that are divisble by 2 and 3 we will use the theory of quadratic forms, modular forms and Gauss’ Eureka theorem to prove the positivity of c t (n).. When p ≥ 5 is prime, we

We are able to prove this estimate of the number of polynomials with 0, 1 coefficients possessing nontrivial di- visors of small degree.. 1991 Mathematics Subject

S z´ek e l y, Crossing numbers and hard Erd˝os problems in Discrete

Using our model permits costs savings by limiting the number of active servers (security check- points) while providing an acceptable waiting time for the customers with