• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

RADIOCARBON DATING CALIBRATION IN ARCHEOLOGICAL STUDIES

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "RADIOCARBON DATING CALIBRATION IN ARCHEOLOGICAL STUDIES"

Copied!
45
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

CHRONOLOGY OF CULTURES BETWEEN

THE VISTULA AND DNIEPER:

3150-1850 B C Ivan T. Chernyakov ElkeKaiser Viktor I. Klo hko Aleksander Ko±ko Nikolay N.Kovalyukh VladimirA. Kr uts Mykola N. Kryvaltsevi h Vadim L. Lakiza Jan Ma hnik Sergey V. Nazarov Alla V. Nikolova Vadim V. Skripkin Marzena Szmyt Mihailo Y. Videiko 1 V O L U M E 7

1999

(2)

‘w.Mar in78

Tel.(061)8536709ext. 147,Fax(061)8533373

EDITOR

AleksanderKo±ko

EDITORIALCOMMITEE

SophiaS.Berezanskaya (Kiev),AleksandraCofta-Broniewska

(Pozna«), Mikhail Charniauski (Minsk), Lu yna Doma«ska

(Šód¹), ViktorI. Klo hko (Kiev), Valentin V. Otrosh henko

(Kiev),PetroTolo hko (Kiev)

SECRETARY

MarzenaSzmyt

SECRETARYOFVOLUME

AgnieszkaPrzybyª

ADAMMICKIEWICZUNIVERSITY

INSTITUTEOFEASTERNSTUDIES

INSTITUTEOFPREHISTORY

Pozna«1999

ISBN83-86094-06-0

(3)

CHRONOLOGY OF CULTURES BETWEEN

THE VISTULA AND DNIEPER:

3150-1850 B C Ivan T. Chernyakov ElkeKaiser Viktor I. Klo hko Aleksander Ko±ko Nikolay N.Kovalyukh VladimirA. Kr uts Mykola N. Kryvaltsevi h Vadim L. Lakiza Jan Ma hnik Sergey V. Nazarov Alla V. Nikolova Vadim V. Skripkin Marzena Szmyt Mihailo Y. Videiko 1 V O L U M E 7

1999

(4)

CoverDesign: EugeniuszSkorwider

Lingvisti onsultation:JohnComber

PrintedinPoland

(5)

EDITORS'FOREWORD ... 5

ASSUMPTIONS ... 7

ViktorI.Klo hko,AleksanderKo±ko,MarzenaSzmyt,PROBLEM

OFTAXONOMICLIMITATIONSINTHESYNTHESISOFTHEHISTORY

OFBALTIC-PONTICBORDERLANDIN3150-1850BC ... 7

NikolayN.Kovalyukh,Sergey V.Nazarov,RADIOCARBON

DATINGCALIBRATIONINARCHEOLOGICALSTUDIES ... 12

VadimV.Skripkin,NikolayN.Kovalyukh,RADIOCARBONLSDATING

OFBONEMICRO-SAMPLES ... 27

PARTI.THEBLACKSEABASIN(CHRONOLOGYOFTAXONOMICUNITS) ... 34

Mihailo Y.Videiko, RADIOCARBONDATINGCHRONOLOGYOFTHELATE

TRIPOLYECULTURE ... 34

ViktorI.Klo hko,VladimirA.Kruts,RADIOCARBONDATES

FROMTHEYAMNAYACULTUREBARROWATTHETRIPOLYECULTURE

"GIANTSETTLEMENT"NEARTALYANKY ... 72

AllaV. Nikolova,RADIOCARBONDATESFROMTHEGRAVES

OFTHEYAMNAYACULTUREATTHEINGULETSRIVER

(THEKIROVOHRADREGION) ... 80

AllaV. Nikolova,RADIOCARBONDATINGOFGRAVES

OFTHEYAMNAYAANDCATACOMBCULTURES

ONTHEDNIEPERRIGHTBANK ... 103

ElkeKaiser,RADIOCARBONDATESFROMCATACOMBGRAVES ... 129

Mykola Kryvaltsevi h,NikolayN.Kovalyukh,RADIOCARBONDATING

OFTHEMIDDLEDNIEPERCULTUREFROMBELARUS ... 151

ViktorI.Klo hko,RADIOCARBONCHRONOLOGYOFTHEEARLY

ANDMIDDLEBRONZEAGEINTHEMIDDLEDNIEPERREGION.

THEMYRONIVKABARROWS ... 163

Marzena Szmyt,IvanT. ChernyakovRADIOCARBONCHRONOLOGY

OF"AKKIEMBETSKIYKURGAN".APRELIMINARYREPORT ... 196

PARTII.THEBALTICSEABASIN(CHRONOLOGYOFPONTIC"INFLUENCE") .. 203

Aleksander Ko±ko,PONTICTRAITSINTHEMATERIALSOF

(6)

CULTURE|ARADIOCARBONPERSPECTIVE ... 211

JanMa hnik, RADIOCARBONCHRONOLOGYOFTHECORDEDWARE

CULTUREONGRZ†DASOKALSKA.AMIDDLEDNIEPER

TRAITSPERSPECTIVE ... 221

VadimL.L akiza, RADIOCARBONDATINGOFTHECORDEDWARE

CULTUREFROMTHENIEMENRIVERBASIN.AGRAVEFROM

PARKHUTY,SITE1,THEGRODNAREGION ... 251

CONCLUSION ... 264

ViktorI.Klo hko,AleksanderKo±ko,MarzenaSzmyt,ACOMPARATIVE

CHRONOLOGYOFTHEPREHISTORYOFTHEAREABETWEEN

THEVISTULAANDDNIEPER:3150-1850BC ... 264

Referen es ... 283

(7)

ThisvolumeoftheBalti Ponti Studies fo usesontheresultsoftheresear h

arried out so far into the absolute (radio arbon) hronology of the area lying

betweentheVistulaandDnieperorthebio- ultural borderlandbetween theWest

andEastofEurope.Absolute hronologyistreatedherebothasaresear hgoaland

fundamentalpremise inthebroaderstudiesof the hronometri anddevelopment

syn hronizationof\borderland" ulturalsystems.Ina seriesofarti les devotedto

individualtaxa a onsiderable numberofnew 14

Cdates havebeen ompared.The

dates on ernsour ematerialsthathavebeen hosenfromthepointofviewoftheir

representativenessand hronometri value (\short-lived"materials werepreferred

to minimize a potential error). The vast majority of analyses were purposefully

made in the same 14

C laboratory of the State S ienti Center of Environmental

Radiogeo hemistry of Ukrainian A ademy of S ien es in Kiev taking advantage of

fundsgenerouslyprovidedbythePolishCommitteeforS ienti Resear h.

Thevolume devotedto the\dark" se tionofthe\borderland"history

(3150--1850BC)isthe rstbutnotthelastpubli ationonthebroaderissuesmentioned

(8)

1. All dates in the B-PS are alibrated [see: Radio arbon vol.28, 1986, andthe

nextvolumes℄.Deviations fromthisrule willbepointoutinnotes.

2. Thenamesofthear haelogi al ulturesandsitesarestandarizedtotheEnglish

literatureonthesubje t(e.g.M.Gimbutas,J.P.Mallory).Inthe aseofanew

term,theauthor'soriginalnamehasbeenretained.

3. The spelling of names of lo alities having the rank of administrative entres

followsoÆ ial,state,Englishlanguage artographi publi ations(e.g. Ukraine,

(9)

PLISSN1231-0344

NikolayN. Kovalyukh,SergeyV.Nazarov

RADIOCARBON DATING CALIBRATION IN

ARCHEOLOGICAL STUDIES

Reliableradio arbondating,whi hdisplaysrealhistori alevents,isatop,whi h

all geo hronologistswith ar heologists are striving to. The 14

C dating due to the

intri ate work made by representatives of radio arbon has nearly been idealized

in re ent yearsbyraising it in the\absolute" rank.These su esses were rea hed

attheimprovement(re nement) a ountofthe alibration urvesbyradio arbon,

whi hwere he kedagainstdendro hronologi aldating.Buildingoflengthsof

sub-- alibration urves hadexa tly reprodu eda temporal interval ofhistori alevents

under study. These studies in separate events have made it possible to re eive

radio arbondating,whi hhad

±

10-20years'mistake.

Thesesu esseshavefor edtotakealookinadi erentwayatthe hronology

and life period of many ultures, whi h lived on theEastern European territory

duringtheAges ofCopper andBronze. Many ultureshad hada rather omplex

way from their spring up to the stopping the existen e. Several ultures, whi h

hadmu h in ommon, nowandthen, were in onta tandlived in parallel overa

ourseofprolongedperiod.Subsequentlytheyweretransformedintoanewunited

ulture.

Allthesestagesofseparate ulturedevelopmentarepossibletobestudywhen

leaningupontheexa t, reliable radio arbondating.

Authorsof given arti le are therepresentatives of an isotopi geo hronology

andtheyhavetheir ownsightfor 14

C datingimprovement.

It is ne essary to pass a long devious road from a sele ted by ar heologists

sample to a radio arbon dating to be get. And su h a road annotbe always

-nishedbythe aim a hievement.Only theimplementation ofserious statisti s, 14

C

dating seriated obtained, makeit possible to onsider realisti ally oneor another

hronologi allengthforthe ultureunderstudy.

Avaliditydegreeofradio arbon dating,obtainedfromdi erentmaterialshas

been onsidered in this arti le. Improvement of BP dating alibration programs

(10)

mistakes,whi h woulddisturbsubsequentlyto produ e orrelation ofradio arbon

datingthathadbeenobtainedby ulturesfromdi erentregions.

Finally, the ontrol between laboratories is pre isely this one whi h allows

toex lude alldoubtsandto referwith on den etoradio arbon datingobtained,

whi ho asionally anmakearevolutioninar heologists'opinionsandwhi hfor e

totakea newglan e forthehistoryofourdistantan estorsexisten e.

1. METHODOLOGYOFRADIOCARBONDATINGCALIBRATION

Radio arbonmethodwasbasedonthesuggestionof 14

C-isotope on entration

onstan yintheatmosphere.However,atmospheri radio arbon on entration

de-pendsonthetensionanddire tivities oftheearth'smagneti eld, osmi fa tors

andsolara tivity.Theinternationalproje ton alibration urvebuildingbyannual

treeringswas reated forthereasonto xthese hange.

(11)

Several unique buried trunkswere sele ted withthisaim to al ulate theage

bytheirwell-savedannual rings.The on entrationsof 14

Cin separateannualtree

rings and orals were determined, and the alibration urve up to 24 000 years

(INTCAL98)wasbuilt[Stuiver,vander Pli ht1998℄.

Theresultsof alibrationaremostarepresentedinthemannerofintervalsset

thathadbeengroupedfor1

σ

,2

σ

and3

σ

with orrespondingdatingprobabilitiesof 63%,95%and99%within.Su hkindofapproa hallowsbeingorientatedtowards

therealhistori allimitsofdating.However,theappli ationofintervals ompli ates

understandingof resultsanddoesnotpresentwith apossibilityfortheirstatisti al

and hronologi al pro essing. That is whythene essity appeared of roundingo

the alibrationresultsandtopresentthemina dotteddatingmanner.

Graphi alpresentationof alibrationisshownontheFig.1.Radio arbonage

Gaussian distributionwhen rossing with alibration urveforms a real histori al

age.Itispossibletode neprobabilityofdatingtobegetinoneoranotherinterval

by the given distribution - it will orrespond to a gure area, whi h will be ut

o bythisinterval.Howeveran estimateofsu hprobability issuÆ iently omplex

omputing pro ess, so it would be simplest to al ulate probability of getting a

resultintotheforehandinterval,andthentode nesubsequentlythisintervalonly.

Itwas ountedthatprobabilityofonemistake(

±σ

)tobebroughtintotheinterval is63%, ofdupli ated mistake (

±

2

σ

)- 95%,a tripled mistake (

±

3

σ

)intervals are used more rarely, probability of nding wherein forms 99%. The employment of

dupli atedmistakeintervalsin pra ti emay besuÆ iently.

Prin iplesofhistori alagedeterminationareshownontheFig. 2.

(12)

Calibration urve, aswellasradio arbon agehas ameasurement mistake.So,

itisne essaryatinterse tionsofradio arbonagedistributionwith alibration urve

to take these mistakes intoa ount. The variants oftaking measurement mistake

intoa ount(

σ

dating)andthe alibration urvemistakes(

σ

urve) areshownon theFig.3[vander Pli ht,Mook,Hasper 1987℄.

Fig.3.Variantsoftakingmeasurementmistakeintoa ountandof alibration urve

The variant 1a does not take a alibration urve mistake into a ount that

givessmallersizesof alibrationintervalsasaresult.Thevariant1bdoestakeboth

mistakes intoa ount bytheir addition -it givesa maximum plausible alibration

resultatthebigintervalsof alibration.And nally,thevariant1 isthemost orre t

onsiderationof mistake from themathemati al standpoint.Ifa alibration urve

werepresentedasadire tline,thevariant1 wouldbeideal,howevera alibration

urveisnotassu h,so ea hofthepresentedmethodofmistakes onsiderationis

meaningfulinoneoranother situations.

Complexitiesof alibrationinterval resultsimplementationforthe

hronologi- alandstatisti alworkshaverequiredanalternativeviewoftheseresults.Certainly,

themostdemonstrativeandsuitable anbesu hapresentationofresultsasadotted

dating.

2. DOTTEDDATING:ADVANTAGESANDDEFECTS

BernhardWeningerwasthe rstto omeforwardforthisproblemde ision.He

hadelaboratedaprogramthatpresentsaresultinoneintervalform;a probability

ofdating ndingoutinwhi hissuÆ iently great.

(13)

alendaragewithadivergen e.Thus,itispossibleto on rmthatthemostprobable

valueofrealhistori alage anformjustthevalueofthisdot.Theagepresentationin

asingledatingformisexpressible byadottedvaluewithadivergen e,howeverthis

dotisnotthemostprobablevalue ofreal histori alage. Histori alagedistribution

is shown on the drawing 6 for Ki-7124 dating, the orresponding dotted dating

presentedby the\Ages" program, andthesingle datingobtained bythe\CalPal"

program.

Fig.4.Comparisonbetweendottedandsingledating

Ea h presentationhasitsown eldofuse -a singledating de nesa rangeof

dating oming,andit anbeusedfororientatingwithinitsstayinglimits; adotted

dating hara terizes the most probable and narrow suÆ iently interval of dating

ndingout.

Main defe t of single dating is a possibilityto de ne broad limits of result

-theyex eed asa ruletheradio arbonageinitial divergen es. Di erentprobability

ofresultfordatinggroupisadefe t ofdotteddating.

3. MATERIALSFORDATINGANDRELIABILITYOFRADIOCARBON

DATINGOBTAINED

Materialsfordatingpurposewithintherangeofreliabilitydegreebythe

radio- arbondatingobtained anbealignedinthefollowingsequen e: largefossilbones

wood

organi remainsofgrasses

large oal

fossilsoils

ne har oal

(14)

Bone material has the major use sin e it is the very reliable and numerous

one whenar heologi al ex avations arried outunderstudies fordating. Calogen

offossilbonesissubje tedsometimestoaba terialpro essing,andtheisotopi age

obtained under investigation of samples an be distortedas a result of biologi al

fra tionation.A orre tionforfra tionation

δ

13

C,whi h anbe obtainedby

mass--spe trometri method,mustbeinputforea hsamplewiththegoalofalldistortions

onsiderationfortheageobtained.

Themostreliable forradio arbon datingaretubularbonesofnormaldensity,

theleastsuitableare onsidered friablebonesandbrainpanswhi hhadbeenbuilt

from neboneplateswithfriableandporoussurfa e, asarule.

Woodfollowsfossilboneswithintherangeofmaterialssafety.Thementioned

one isoften met at ex avations. The reliable radio arbon dating an be get from

thewood samples when orre t hemi al training hadbeen arriedout. However

thefa t an betakeninto onsiderationthatthewoodwhile keeping inthesoilis

subje ted to de omposition, and in themost ases we an deal with thesamples

presentinga entralpart ofa tree.Inthese ases datingare to beaged arti ially

for50-150years.

The examples of radio arbon dating of Yamnaya ulture (YC) monuments

obtainedfromdi erentmaterial(tree,fossilbones)arepresentedinTables1and2.

Table 1

TheresultsoftheYamnaya ulturesamplesradio arbondating(fossiltree)oftheUkrainianterritory

No. Tie L ab. AgeBP

L o ation Sample Presentedby Number

1 Vidradne,NovyiBuhDistr., barrow1, O.G.Shaposhnikova Ki-7070 3890

±

65 MykolaivRegion burial21

2 Vishneve,TatarbunaryDistr., barrow17, L.V.Subbotin Ki-7126 4105

±

65 OdesaRegion burial38

3 Novoselitsa,TatarbunaryDistr., barrow19, L.V.Subbotin Ki-7127 4055

±

60 OdesaRegion burial19

4 Novoselitsa,TatarbunaryDistr., barrow20, L.V.Subbotin Ki-7128 4005

±

50 OdesaRegion burial8

5 Vinogradne,TomakivkaDistr., barrow15, V.V.Otrosh henko Ki-7129 4145

±

55 ZaporizhzhiaRegion burial5

6 Kremniovka,VolodarskeDistr., barrow6, S.M.Brat henko Ki-7124 4325

±

60 DonetskRegion burial6

7 Kremniovka,VolodarskeDistr., barrow6, S.M.Brat henko Ki-7125 4365

±

55 DonetskRegion burial7

(15)

Table 2

TheresultsofYamnaya ulturesamplesradio arbondating(fossilbones)ofUkrainianterritory

No. Tie L ab. AgeBP

L o ation Sample Number

1 Ordzhonikidze-1997 b.11,g.90 Ki-6571a 4035

±

50 2 Ordzhonikidze-1997 b.11,g.11 Ki-6572a 4005

±

55 3 Golovkovka b.6,g.8 Ki-6719 3970

±

55 4 Golovkovka b.7,g.4 Ki-6722 3980

±

60 5 Golovkovka b.11,g.5 Ki-6723 4030

±

60 6 Golovkovka b.12,g.3 Ki-6724 3950

±

50 7 Golovkovka b.5,g.3 Ki-6730a 3925

±

55 8 Golovkovka b.5,g.5 Ki-6731 4005

±

55 9 Protopopovka b.2,g.2 Ki-6733 3945

±

50 10 Protopopovka b.2,g.3 Ki-6734 3925

±

55

Diagramof omparisonfor alibratedradio arbondatingobtainedbywoodand

fossilbones (Table 1andTable 2)isshownontheFig. 5. From thedata obtained

one an see that radio arbon dating presented by wood are more an ient. The

earlier datinghas beenobtained,a ordingtothediagram, forthe®Kremniovka¯

monument - about 3 thousand BC years. However, one important point should

be remembered, thatwe used to ompare di erentmonumentsof YC,whi h are

situated in di erent regions of Ukraine. That is why, this question requires an

extendeddis ussionsforthe nal on lusions.

(16)

Table 3

Theresultsofinterlaboratory ontrol

No. Sample Kievradio arbonlaboratory Oxfordradio arbonlaboratory

L ab.Number Age 14

C,BP L ab.Number Age 14

C,BP

1 Nikolsky,grave125 Ki-6603 6160

±

70 OXA-5029 6300

±

80 2 Yasinovatka,grave45 Ki-6791 6305

±

80 OXA-6164 6360

±

75 3 Yasinovatka,grave19 Ki-6788 6310

±

85 OXA-6165 6370

±

60 4 Vasilievka5,grave29 Ki-6776 6220

±

60 OXA-6198 6298

±

70 5 Vasilievka5,grave8 Ki-6777 6430

±

50 OXA-6171 6470

±

70 6 Marievka5,grave10 Ki-6781 7585

±

80 OXA-6200 7620

±

100 7 Marievka5,grave14 Ki-6780 7600

±

100 OXA-6269 7630

±

110

Fig.6.Radio arbondating omparison

Itisne essaryalso to onsiderareliability degreeofradio arbon dating

obta-inedby nefragmental har oal.Asoftenhappens,thear heologistsatex avations

nd a body of ne fragmental har oal in a ultural layer, whi h di ers in later

agefromthemonumentsstudied. Su hkindof bodiesare formed, asarule,after

large resat thesa ri e of llingrodentsandinse ts burrowswithlight har oal

transferredbywindsand oods.So,itispreferabletouse harredwoodfragments

(17)

Interlaboratory ontrol is one of number reliability and validity riteria for

radio arbon dating obtained as well. L aboratories parti ipating in su h a kind of

ontrolwithapurposeofisotopi datingmakes usesamples withpra ti ally equal

radio arbon ontents.There were presentedfragments ofmen skeletonskullsfor

omparison by radio arbon between laboratories. Materials for dating had been

takenfrom thedi erent Neolithi burial-mounds,situatedthrough theUkrainian

territory. These materials have been presented to Kiev and Oxford radio arbon

laboratories byprof.D.Y.Telegin. Resultsof radio arbondating areshowninthe

Table 3.Theanalysis ofresulting dataexhibitedin theFig.6, pointstothefa tof

good oordinationbetweendatingobtainedbypre isely these samplesin di erent

laboratories.

4. COMPUTER-AIDEDMANUFACTURINGOFCALIBRATION

There are some programs for radio arbon dating alibration. A more

wide-spreadamongstthemarethefollowing:Groningenradio arbon alibrationprogram

(\Cal25")designedbyJohannesvanderPli htat theCenterofIsotopi Studiesof

GroningenUniversity[vanderPli ht1993℄,Oxford alibrationprogram(\OxCal")

designed by ChristopherB. Ramsey at Radio arbon Department of Oxford

Uni-versity [Ramsey 1995℄ and \CalPal" alibration program of Bernhard Weninger

developedintheradio arbonlaboratoryofCologneUniversity[Weninger1986℄.

Radio arbondating alibration analsobeexe utedbyKievradio arbon

ali-brationprogram\Ages",designedintheradio arbonlaboratoryattheState

S ien-ti Center of Environmental Radiogeo hemistry of NAN of Ukraine [Nazarov,

Kovalyukh 1999℄.The program is fun tioningby IBM PC joint omputers under

MS Windows 95operating systemmanagement. Main advantages of theprogram

are onvenientwayinuse,interfa eforlotsoflanguagesandpossibilityfor

alibra-tionresultstobeexportedin themostwidespreadgraphi formatsof les.

The \Ages" program had been written onC++ language and was exe uted

ina ordan ewith Windows95standards.All theprogramfun tionsprovidedare

available throughthemainmenu, butthemostabundantoneshavebeenbrought

tothepanelofqui ka ess.

For purpose of dating alibration it is ne essary and suÆ iently to indi ate

its radio arbon age in BP

±σ

form. The program allows if needed to add some additionalinformationofdatinglaboratorynumber,tie,ownerofsampleet .When

reating a list of samples it is possibleto indi ate thesample's name and author.

(18)

Inasmu h asthere issuÆ iently great amount of alibration urves uptothe

presentday, theprogramgives a han e to hooseone of the urves represented

intheformofseparate les.

Calibration urve,pra ti ally,ispresentedbyasetofdotsputdown10-20years

distantof time lapse from one dotto another. Cubi interpolationis usedin the

programforthe urvepresentationasuninterrupted urve.Fun tionformbetween

twodotsisdetermined byfourdotsaroundones[Reins h1967℄.Theestimationof

radio arbonageGaussiandistributionisexe utedwithin3

σ

limits.

There were four programs to be used in order to ompare the alibration

results:\Cal25",\OxCal",\CalPal"and\Ages".Theparametersofprimary

impor-tan e omparisonare ertainlytheresultsof alibration.Theprograms\Cal25"and

\OxCal"presenttheresultsinanintervaltype,thesingledatingprogramisaresult

of\CalPal" alibrationprogram,the\Ages"programpresentsaresultsjustasinan

intervalsoin adotteddating.The alibrationresultsare providedintheTable4.

Table 4

Theresultsofradio arbon dating alibration

L ab. Cal25 OxCal CalPal Ages

number dot intervals

Ki-7070 1

σ

2465-2289 1

σ

2470-2280 2355

±

95 2388

±

82 1

σ

2470-2306 2

σ

2559-2535 2

σ

2560-2520 2

σ

2572-2515 2531-2523 2500-2190 2500-2271 2495-2197 2170-2140 2257-2227 2163-2145 2223-2204 Ki-7126 1

σ

2861-2811 1

σ

2860-2810 2700

±

120 2638

±

65 1

σ

2862-2808 2755-2723 2760-2720 2777-2773 2701-2575 2700-2570 2758-2720 2511-2505 2510-2500 2704-2573 2

σ

2877-2555 2

σ

2880-2490 2514-2501 2539-2495 2

σ

2880-2471 Ki-7127 1

σ

2835-2817 1

σ

2840-2810 2640

±

130 2586

±

36 1

σ

2832-2820 2663-2647 2670-2470 2661-2650 2625-2487 2

σ

2870-2460 2623-2550 2485-2471 2542-2491 2

σ

2865-2807 2479-2474 2781-2771 2

σ

2863-2807 2759-2717 2779-2771 2707-2463 2759-2719 2706-2464 Ki-7128 1

σ

2575-2511 1

σ

2580-2460 2530

±

60 2542

±

34 1

σ

2576-2508

(19)

L ab. Cal25 OxCal CalPal Ages

number dot intervals

2505-2467 2

σ

2840-2810 2504-2468 2

σ

2835-2817 2670-2400 2

σ

2828-2823 2663-2649 2380-2340 2658-2652 2625-2401 2622-2607 2379-2349 2602-2458 2419-2406 2358-2356 Ki-7129 1

σ

2869-2831 1

σ

2870-2600 2730

±

100 2748

±

127 1

σ

2876-2621 2821-2805 2

σ

2880-2570 2608-2599 2783-2769 2587-2585 2761-2717 2

σ

2883-2571 2709-2661 2516-2500 2651-2623 2605-2603 2

σ

2881-2617 2613-2577 Ki-7124 1

σ

3019-2977 1

σ

3020-2880 2975

±

75 2906

±

20 1

σ

3014-2981 2971-2945 2

σ

3300-2700 2963-2951 2939-2885 2927-2886 2

σ

3261-3243 2

σ

3094-2878 3099-2865 2807-2781 2771-2761 2719-2707 Ki-7125 1

σ

3081-3069 1

σ

3080-3060 3010

±

80 2967

±

60 1

σ

3081-3068 3027-2909 3030-2900 3028-2907 2

σ

3307-3291 2

σ

3310-3230 2

σ

3260-3241 3289-3271 3110-2880 3099-2884 3265-3239 3169-3161 3101-2883 Ki-6571a 1

σ

2619-2609 1

σ

2620-2470 2580

±

80 2534

±

48 1

σ

2619-2610 2597-2591 2

σ

2860-2810 2597-2590 2583-2487 2750-2720 2582-2486 2485-2471 2700-2460 2484-2472 2

σ

2857-2813 2

σ

2854-2851 2735-2725 2841-2816 2697-2463 2671-2464 Ki-6572a 1

σ

2617-2613 1

σ

2620-2610 2540

±

70 2522

±

55 1

σ

2616-2614 2579-2465 2580-2460 2577-2467 2

σ

2853-2849 2

σ

2900-2800 2

σ

2832-2820 2841-2815 2700-2300 2661-2650 2669-2397 2623-2403

(20)

L ab. Cal25 OxCal CalPal Ages

number dot intervals

Ki-6719 1

σ

2573-2515 1

σ

2580-2400 2475

±

85 2479

±

19 1

σ

2566-2520 2501-2455 2380-2350 2498-2460 2447-2433 2

σ

2620-2290 2

σ

2619-2611 2423-2403 2596-2592 2373-2371 2581-2306 2363-2353 2

σ

2621-2609 2597-2589 2583-2297 Ki-6722 1

σ

2577-2455 1

σ

2580-2400 2490

±

90 2480

±

20 1

σ

2572-2515 2445-2435 2370-2350 2500-2461 2421-2403 2

σ

2850-2800 2

σ

2826-2826 2363-2353 2700-2250 2657-2653 2

σ

2833-2819 2621-2608 2661-2649 2601-2306 2623-2293 Ki-6723 1

σ

2657-2653 1

σ

2660-2650 2590

±

100 2527

±

57 1

σ

2620-2609 2621-2607 2630-2460 2598-2588 2601-2467 2

σ

2900-2350 2584-2470 2

σ

2861-2811 2

σ

2858-2812 2755-2721 2744-2724 2703-2455 2698-2459 2449-2431 2416-2409 2423-2403 2375-2369 2365-2353 Ki-6724 1

σ

2557-2537 1

σ

2560-2520 2450

±

90 2466

±

10 1

σ

2551-2541 2527-2525 2500-2400 2491-2478 2495-2401 2380-2340 2475-2456 2379-2349 2

σ

2580-2290 2447-2433 2

σ

2575-2511 2421-2404 2503-2295 2362-2353 2

σ

2575-2511 2503-2295 Ki-6730a 1

σ

2471-2331 1

σ

2480-2300 2410

±

80 2433

±

37 1

σ

2470-2396 2323-2309 2

σ

2580-2200 2386-2339 2

σ

2571-2517 2318-2312 2499-2281 2

σ

2570-2517 2251-2233 2499-2280 2219-2207 2251-2231 2219-2207 Ki-6731 1

σ

2617-2613 1

σ

2620-2610 2540

±

70 2522

±

55 1

σ

2616-2614 2579-2465 2580-2460 2577-2467 2

σ

2853-2849 2

σ

2900-2800 2

σ

2832-2820

(21)

L ab. Cal25 OxCal CalPal Ages

number dot intervals

2841-2815 2700-2300 2661-2650 2669-2397 2623-2403 2385-2345 2376-2352 Ki-6733 1

σ

2555-2539 1

σ

2560-2530 2445

±

85 2438

±

35 1

σ

2549-2543 2495-2399 2500-2340 2490-2480 2381-2347 2

σ

2580-2290 2473-2403 2

σ

2575-2513 2376-2352 2503-2293 2

σ

2574-2513 2501-2293 Ki-6734 1

σ

2471-2331 1

σ

2480-2300 2410

±

80 2433

±

37 1

σ

2470-2396 2323-2309 2

σ

2580-2200 2386-2339 2

σ

2571-2517 2318-2312 2499-2281 2

σ

2570-2517 2251-2233 2499-2280 2219-2207 2251-2231 2219-2207

Justthesame alibration urve-INTCAL98wasusedwhen alibration.

Dis re-pan ybetweenthese alibrationresultsareexplainedbythea ura yof al ulations

applied in theprogramand, ertainly, bythemethod of alibration urve and

ra-dio arbondatingerrors onsideration[vanderPli ht, Mook1987℄.

(22)

Fig. 7illustrates a graphi omparisonof alibration interval resultsformore

pi torialvisualization oftheresults.

Comparisonof alibrationresultsistheveryimportantquestionwhenthe

pro-grams are ompared, however, a listof additional fun tionsprovided bythe

pro-grams, omfortof input-outputdata, et . are tobe ne essary taken intoa ount.

Theprograms\Cal25"and\CalPal"runonunderMSDOSoperatingsystem,thatis

whyanexportofresultstoanotherappli ationsisobstru ted.\OxCal" and\Ages"

aredevoidsu hadefe t-bothofthemrunonunderMSWindowsoperatingsystem

andhavetheexportmeansofresults.

There ismore spe i attention paidforexporting of graphi al resultstothe

ve torformatsin\Ages" program, thatallows editingeasy lateron.Suitable print

fun tionsallow tomakeprintouteasilyofbothsingledating alibrationresultsand

datinggroupsresultstables.

5. CONTRIBUTIONTOTHEYAMNAYACULTURECHRONOLOGY

Weusedradio arbon datingobtained as toYC of Ukrainiansteppeand

par-tially forest - steppezones for hronologi al analysis. Full des ription of YC

mo-numentspointedin theTable 1andTable 2isillustratedin thepublishedworkof

D.Y.Telegin[Telegin 1977℄.

As for limate- hronologi al aspe ttheYC ontheterritoryof Ukraine ame

intoexisten eonthemarkofAtlanti andSubborealperiods hanging,about

3200--2900 years BC. Then more severe subboreal limate gave way to warm limate

ofAtlanti period.The \Kremniovka"monument(itwas amongthosewith dating

arried out) whi h was existing in 2970-2900years BC belongs, by isotopi data,

tothemonumentsofEarlyYC. Almostwithoutex eptionall themonumentswith

dating arried outrefer to theL ateYC age. A limati optimum appearsin that

time(2800-2400yearsBC),whi hpromotesdemographyburstandblossomingforth

ofYC.Coldandhumid limateofEarlySubborealgavewaytowarmandtemperate

dry limate-theoptimum onditionsforlifeappear-highgrassesinsteppes,

broad--leaved forests in partially wooden steppe zone. A large number of radio arbon

dating,whi h hara terizethemainstageoftheL ateYCdevelopmentwithin

2600--2400yearsBC hronologi al limits.

We an on ludebyisotopi hronologi alinvestigationsthatYCexistedabout

onethousandyearsontheterritoryof Ukrainesin ethetime ofitsin ipien e up

(23)

CONCLUSIONS

a. Radio arbondating alibration is a omplex mathemati al pro essof natural

hangesandmeasurementsfaults onsiderationinradio arbonage ndingout,

howeverthispro essisrequiredfortherealhistoryageestimation.Ambiguous

approa hforthesefa tors onsiderationexplainsadi eren ebetween

alibra-tionresultsobtainedbydi erent alibration programs.

b. Dotteddating a ount applied in theprogram isnot ideal, andit requires a

furtherstudy.

. Dotteddataobtained are appropriate in the aseof using themin a

hrono-logi alandastatisti information,howevertheemploymentofintervalswhi h

displayall thepossible on nesofdating ndingoutwouldbe more orre tly

forthesamplehistori alagedatingdetermination.

d. Tubular fossilbones arethebestar heologi al materials sothattheplausible

data anbeobtainedbyradio arbon.

e. Essentially all radio arbon dating presented of YC through the territory of

Ukraineare withinthesubboreal limati optimum(4200-3900BP).

(24)

AO { Arkheologi heskiyeotkrytya,Moskva.

AJA { Ameri anJournalofAr haeology,NewYork.

BPS { Balti -Ponti Studies,Pozna«.

EA { EurasiaAntiqua,Berlin.

FPP { Folia Praehistori a Posnaniensia,Pozna«.

KSIA { Kratkiyesoobsh heniyaInstitutaArkheologii,Moskva.

KSIAANUSSR { Kratkiye soobsh heniya Instituta Arkheologii AN USSR,

Kiev.

KSIIMK { Kratkiye soobsh heniya Instituta Istorii Materialnoy

kul-tury,Moskva.

KSOGAM { Kratkie Soobsh heniya OdesskogoGosudarstvennogo

Ar-kheologi heskogoMuzeya,Odessa.

MIA { Materialy iissledovaniyapoarkheologii,Moskva.

NAIANANU { NaukovyArkhivInstitutaArkheologiiNa ionalnoi

Akade-mii NaukUkrainu, Kiev.

SA { SovetskayaArkheologia, Moskva.

SpA { SprawozdaniaAr heologi zne, Kraków.

ZFA { Zeits hriftf urAr haologie,Berlin.

REFERENCES

AleksandrovskiyA.L.,O.A.Chi hagova,K.E.Pustovoytov,N.I. Shishlina

1997 Metodika i metodologiya radiouglerodnykh issledovaniy

arkheologi he-skikh obyektov stepnykhregionov Rossii. In: P.M. Kozhin (Ed.), Step i

Kavkaz.TrudyGosudarstvennogoIstori heskogoMuzeya,9-21.Moskva.

AlekseyevaI.L.

1992 KurganyepokhipaleometallavSevero-zapadnom Pri hernomorye.Kiev.

Arkheologiya

1985 ArkheologiyaUkrainskoyS SR,2ndedition.Kiev.

ArslanovKh.A.

1987 Radio arbon:Geo hemistryandGeo hronology.L eningrad,L eningrad

Uni-versityPress.

ArtemenkoI.I.

(25)

38-1964 Neoliti heskiyestoyankiikurganyepokhibronzyblizs.Khodosovi hi,

Go-melskoyobl.BSSR.In:PamyatnikikamiennogoibronzovogovekovEvrazii,

31-87.Moskva.

1967 PlemenaverkhnegoisrednegoPodneproviav epokhubronzy.Moskva.

1976a Belynetskiymogilnik(raskopki1970-1971g.g.). In:Vosto hnaya Evropav

epokhukamniaibronzy,155-175.Moskva.

1976b Mogilniksrednedneprovskoykulturyvuro hish heStrelitsa. In:Eneoliti

bronzoviyvekUkrainy,69-96.Kiev.

1985 Srednedneprovskayakultura.In:ArkheologiyaUkrainskoyS SR,vol.1:

364--374.Kiev.

1987a Srednedneprovskayakultura.In:EpokhabronzylesnoypolosyS S SR,37-42.

Moskva.

1987b KulturyrannegobronzovegovekajuzhnojpolosylesovEvropejskoy hasti

SSSR.In:EpokhabronzylesnoypolosyS S SR,35-51.Moskva.

Bagi«skaJ.

1988 Cmentarzyskokurhanowekultury eramiki sznurowejw Šub zu,stan.24,

gm. Jar zów, woj.zamojskie.In: Sprawozdaniaz bada«terenowy hw

wo-jewództwiezamojskimw1988roku,5-6.Zamo±¢.

1990 KurhanKCSz| stanowisko30w Wersz zy y,gm. Jar zów.In:

Sprawoz-daniaz bada« terenowy hwwojewództwiezamojskimw 1990roku, 20-23.

Zamo±¢.

1992 CmentarzyskokurhanoweKCSznaGrzdzieSokalskiej |stanowisko25

wNede»owie, gm.Jar zów. In:Sprawozdania zbada«terenowy hw

woje-wództwiezamojskimw1992roku,9-10.Zamo±¢.

1996 Kurhankultury eramikisznurowejo stratygra znym ukªadzie grobówz

Nede»owawwoj.zamojskimna GrzdzieSokalskiej.SA48:59-66.

1997 Cmentarzyskokurhanowekultury eramikisznurowejnaGrzdzie

Sokal-skiej|stanowiskaŠub ze37,Wersz zy a1.Ar heologiaPolski

‘rodkowo--Ws hodniej2:45-52.

1998 Badania kurhanu kultury eramiki sznurowej na Grzdzie Sokalskiej w

Hubinku,stan.4,woj. zamojskie.Ar heologiaPolski±rodkowo-Ws hodniej

3:69-77.

BerezanskaS.S.

1971 Sredniodneprovskakultura. In: Arkheologiya Ukrainskoy S SR,vol.1,

309--317.Kiev.

Berniakovi¢K.V.

1959 

Sidlisteliduzes nurovoukeramikounahornimDnestruaSanu.

(26)

BogatayaL.V., I.V.Manzura

1994 Ost-West-We hselbeziehungenimSpiegelderaneolithis h-fr 

uhbronzezeit-li hen Kulturen des nordwestli hen S hwarzmeergebietes. Zeits hrift f ur

Ar haologie28:63-86.

Brat henkoS.N.

1976 NizhneyePodonevepokhu sredneybronzy.Kiev.

Brat henkoS.N.,O.Shaposhnikova

1985 Katakombnayakulturno-istori heskayaobsh hnost.In:Arkheologiya

Ukra-inskoyS SR,vol.1,403-420.Kiev.

BrykJ.

1930 Neolity zne kurhany ze szkieletami skur zonymi w Ka zanów e w pow.

skaªa kim, woj. tarnopolskie.In: Ksiga pami¡tkowa ku z i prof. dr. W.

Demetrykiewi za,135-150.Pozna«.

Bu hvaldekM.

1986a Kulturases nurovu keramikouv stredni Evrope, I. Skupiny mezi Har em a

Bilmi Karpaty.Praehistori a12.Praha.

1986b Zum gemeineuropais hen Horizont der S hnurkeramik. Praehistoris he

Zeits hrift:61:129-151.

Bu hvaldekM.,D. Koute ky

1970 Vikleti e.EinS hnurkeramis hes Graberfeld.Praehistori a 3.Praha.

BudziszewskiJ.

1995 Flintmaterials from emeteries oftheSo evkatype,BPS5:148-190.

BurdoN.B., M.Y.Videiko

1998 OsnovykhronologyiTripolye-Cu uteni.Arkheologiya2:17-29.

BuzinnyM., V.Skripkin

1995 NewlyDesigned 0.8mlTe on

R

Vial forMi rovolume Radio arbon

Da-ting.Radio arbon34(2):724-748.

BydªowskiA.

1905 Mogiªy z Ja kowi y w powie ie lipowie kim w gub.Kijowskiej. ‘wiatowit

6:8-30.

Cha hlikowskiP.

1994 Osiedlakulturypu harów lejkowaty hwPodgaju,woj.wªo ªawskie,

stanowi-sko6A.Pozna«.

CharniauskiM.M.

1963 Starazhytniyashakhtypazdaby hykremeniu. In:VestiANB S SR.Ser.

gra-mad.navuk, No.3.Minsk.

1979 NealitBelaruskagaPaniamonnya. Minsk.

(27)

CharniauskiM.M., M.M.Kryvaltsevi h

1993 Bronzavyvek.In:ArkhealogiyainumizmatykaBelarusi.Entsyklapedyia,

96--97.Minsk.

CharniauskiM.M., V.I.Kudrashou,V.L. Lipnitskaya

1996 Starazhytniyashakhtsyoryna Rosi.Minsk.

CharniauskiM.M., V.L.L akiza

1995 ZnakhodkikamennykhsvidravanykhsiakernaPaniamonni.In:

Gistary h-na-arkhealagi hnyzbornik7:46-59.

Cheredni henkoN.N.,S.Z.Pustovalov

1991 Boyeviyekolesnitsyi kolesni hiev obsh hestvekatakombnoykultury.SA

4:206-216.

ChernyakovI.T.,G.N.Toshtsev

1985 Kulturno-khronologi heskiyeosobiennostikurgannykhpogrebeniyepokhi

bronzynizhnego Dunaya. In: Novyye materialy po arkheologii

Cevero-Za-padnogoPristernomoriya,5-31.Kiev.

1986 Moldaviaisosedniyeterritorriivepokhu bronzy.Kishiniev.

1995 Grobni yKemi-ObinskogotipaCevero-ZapadnogoPri hernomorya.

Ros-siyskayaArkheologiya3:193-197.

ChernykhL.A.

1991 Derevyannayapovozkaiz katakomnogopogrebeniyaug.

Kamenka-Dnie-perovskaya.In: KatakombniyekulturySevernogo Pri hernomorya,137-149.

Kiev.

ChernyshY.K.

1982 EneolitPravoberezhnoyUkrainyi Moldavii.In:EneolitS S SR.Moskva.

ChmykhovM.O, I.T.Chernyakov

1988 Khronologiaarkheologi hnykh pamyatokepokhymidi-bronzy na teritorii

U-krainy.Kiev.

ClarkR.A.

1975 A alibration urveofradio arbondates. Antiquity49:251-266.

Cofta-BroniewskaA.

1989 Methodology of Regional Studies in Kuiavia. In: A. Cofta-Broniewska

(Ed.), Prehistori onta ts of Kuiavian ommunities with other European

peoples,13-24.Warszawa.

Cu osS.

1984 L a n de la ulture Cu uteni dans le ontexte de l'eneolitique du bas

-Danube. La ivilisationdeCu uteni en ontexteEuropeen: 125-132.Iasi.

CzebreszukJ.

(28)

CzebreszukJ., A.Ko±ko,P.Makarowi z,M.Szmyt

1999 Podsumowanie. In: A. Ko±ko (Ed.) Ar heologi zne badania ratowni ze

wzdªu» trasy gazo i¡gu tranzytowego, Vol. III Kujawy, Part 4, Osadni two

Kultur pó¹noneolity zny h oraz interstadium epok neolitu i br¡zu: 3900

-1400/1300B C.Pozna«,inprint.

CzebreszukJ., M.Szmyt

1992 Osadni twoneolity zneiw zesnobr¡zowewDba hwoj.wªo ªawskie,

stano-wisko29.Pozna«-Inowro ªaw.

1998 DerEpo henumbru hvomNeolithikumzurBronzezeitimPolnis hen

Tie- andam BeispielKujawiens. Praehistoris heZeits hrift73:167-232.

2000 The IIIMillennium BC inKujawy inthelight of radio arbon dating.In:

J.Czebreszuk, J. M 

ller(Eds.)TheAbsoluteChronologyinCentralEurope

duringtheIII MillenniumB C. Pozna«-Berlin, inprint.

Czerniak L.,L.Doma«ska,A. Ko±ko,D. Prinke

1991 TheFunnelBeakerCultureinKujavia.In:D.Jankowska(Ed.),Die

Tri h-terbe herkultur.NeueFors hungenund Hypthesen,vol.2,67-76.Pozna«

DanilenkoV.N.

1974 EneolitUkrainy.Kiev.

DanilenkoV.N.,N.J. Makarevi h

1956 Chervonokhytirskiymogilnikmidnogovikyztrupospaleynnami, AP6:

92--98.

DavnyaistoriyaUkrainy

1997 DavnyaistoriyaUkrainy,vol.1.Kiev.

Derga hevV.A.

1980 PamyatnikipozdnegoTripolya.Kishinev.

Derga hevV.A. ManzuraI.V.

1991 PogrebalnyekompleksyPozdnegoTripolya.Kishinev.

DolukhanovP.M.,V.I. Timofeev

1972 Absolutnaya khronologiyaneolita Evrazii (po dannym radiouglerodnogo

metoda).In:B.A. Kol hin[Ed.℄Problemyabsolutnogodatirovanniyaw

ar-kheologii,28-75.Moskva.

Dumitres uV.

1974 Chronologiaabsolutaaeneoliti iluiromanes inluminadatelorC 14

.

Apu-lumXII. AlbaIulia.

DvoryaninovS.A.,A.N.Dzigovskiy,L.V.Subbotin

1985 Raskopkikurgannoygruppyus.Vishnevoe.In:Noviyematerialypo

arkhe-ologiiSevero-ZapadnogoPri hernomorya,132-173.Kiev.

EastonD.

(29)

GimbutasM.

1956 The prehistoryofEasternEurope.Part1.Ameri an S hool of Prehistori

Resear h Bulletin20.

1991 TheCivilizationoftheGoddess.TheWorldof OldEurope.SanFran is o.

GirininkasA.

1990 Kratuonas.Sredniyipozdniyneolit. In:ArkhealogiyaLitvy.Vilnius.

GorodtsovV.A.

1900 Nazna heniyeglinyanykhplos hadokvdoistori heskoykulturetripolskogo

tipa.In:Arkheologi heskiyeizvestiyaizametki, 11-12.Moskva.

G orsdorfJ.,J. Bojadzhiev

1996 Zur absoluten Chronologie der bulgaris hen Urges hi hte. Beliner 14

C--Datierungen von bulgaris hen ar haologis hen Fundplatzen. EA2:

105--173.

GurbaJ.,J. Wojtanowi z

1974 Problematykaar heologi zno-geogra znakurhanówi mentarzysk

kurha-nowy hnaGrzdzieSokalskiej.In:PrzewodnikXIIOgólnopolskiegoZjazdu

PolskiegoTowarzystwaGeogra znego,57-61.Lublin.

Jastrzbski S.

1989 KulturaCu uteni-Trypoleijejosadni twona W y»ynieWoªy«skiej.Lublin.

1991 The settlement of theFunnel Beaker ulture at Gródek Nadbu»ny, the

Zamo±¢distri t, site 1 | brief hara teristi s. In:D. Jankowska (Ed.)

DieTri hterbe herkultur.NeueFors hungenundHypothesen,vol.2,189-196.

Pozna«.

Ka halovaN.K.

1974 ErmitazhnayakollektsiyaN.E.Brandenburgaepokhibronzy.Svod

Arkheolo-gi heskikhIsto hnikov,vyp.B4-12.Moskva.

KadrowS.

1995 Absolute hronologyoftheSo evka typein thelight of 'wiggle mathing'

analysis.In:Cemeteries of theSo evkatype:2950-2750BC. BPS3:

141--147.

KadrowS., A.Ko±ko,M.Videiko

1995 Pottery stylisti s of the So evka type: geneti - ultural quali ation. In:

Cemeteries oftheSo evkatype:2950-2750BC.BPS3:200-213.

KadrowS., J.Ma hnik

1997 Kulturamierzanowi ka.Chronologia,taksonomiairozwójprzestrzenny.

Kra-ków.

KadrowS., M.Szmyt

1996 Absolute hronologyof theeastern groupofGlobularAmphora ulture.

(30)

KempistyA.

1978 S hyªek neolitu i po z¡tki epoki br¡zu na W y»ynie Maªopolskiej w ±wietle

bada«nad kop ami.Warszawa.

1982 Problem metalurgii miedzi w kulturze sznuroweji kultura h

postsznuro-wy hna póªno odKarpat.PamitnikMuzeum Miedzi1:67-78.

KlejnL.S.

1964 Obe no±¢elementów poªudniowo-ws hodni hw pó¹noneolity zny h

kul-tura hMaªopolski, AP9:371-399.

Klo hkoV.I.

1984 Ot hetorabote Mironovskoyekspeditsii InstitutaarkheologiiAN USSR

v1984g.Kiev.(manus ript,in:Nau hniyarkhivInstitutaArkheologiiNAN

Ukrainy,No. 1984/21).

1995 Copperobje tsandquestions of\So evkametallurgy". In:Cemeteries of

theSo evkatype:2950-2750BC.BPS5:235-242.

Klo hkoV.I.,A.Ko±ko

1995 Weapons from So evka type emeteries. In: Cemeteries of the So evka

type:2950-2750BC.BPS5:228-234.

Klo hkoV.I.,B.Stolpiak

1995 Glassbeads fromSo evka emetery.In:CemeteriesoftheSo evkatype:

2950-2750BC. BPS5:243-246.

Kol hinB.A., N.Y. Sher

1972 Absolutnoye datirovaniyevarkheologii. In: B.A. Kol hin [Ed.℄ Problemy

absolutnogodatirovaniyav arkheologii:3-10.Moskva.

KomanW.

1988 Badania mikroregionalne na Grzdzie Sokalskiej. Cmentarzysko

kurha-nowe kultury eramiki sznurowej w Šub zu na stan. 2, gm. Jar zów. In:

Sprawozdania z bada« terenowy h w województwie zamojskim w 1990 r.,

11-19.Zamo±¢.

1990 Badania mikroregionalne na GrzdzieSokalskiej. In:Sprawozdania z

ba-da«terenowy hwwoj.zamojskimw1990roku,11-19.Zamo±¢.

1998 Sprawozdania z bada« wykopaliskowy h kurhanu kultury eramiki

sznu-rowejnastan.3wHubinku,woj.zamojskie.Ar heologiaPolski

‘rodkowo--Ws hodniej3:61-68.

KomanW.,J.Ma hnik

1993 Mohyly kult ury sosn urovoukeramikou v juhozapadnej  asti Woly«skej

Vysiny.Vy hodoslovenskyPravek4:41-47.Nitra-Kosi e.

KonoplaV.

1998 Klasiphikatsya kremyanoy sirovini zakhodu Ukraini. Naukovi Zapiski 7:

(31)

KorovinaA.K.

1974 KurganMezhlimanniy. SA4:201-215.

Ko±koA.

1981 Udziaª poªudniowo-ws hodnioeuropejski h wzor ów kulturowy h wrozwoju

ni»owy hspoªe ze«stwkulturypu harów lejkowaty h.Pozna«.

1985 In uen esofthe\pre-yamnaya"(\pre-pitgrave")CommunitiesfromBla k

SeaSteppeAreainWesternEuropeanCultures.In:J.Kozªowski,J.

Ma h-nik(Eds),L' 

Eneolithiqueetledebutdel'^agedubronzedans ertainesregions

del'Europe,57-72.Wro ªaw-Warszawa-Kraków-Gda«sk-Šód¹.

1986 Papros,woj. Bydgosz z, stan.6A,6B, 6G|obozowiska z fazylubo«skiej

(IV)kultury pu harów lejkowaty h (Przy zynek dobada« nad

pó¹nopu- harowymifazamirozwojukulturypu harówlejkowaty hwstre e

wielko-dolinnejNi»uPolskiego).FPP2:13-67.

1987 Osady kultury pu harów lejkowaty h w Inowro ªawiu-M¡twa h, woj.

Byd-gosz z, stanowisko1.Inowro ªaw.

1988 Formyeksploata jipowierz hnistanowiskawepoka hneolituibr¡zu.In:

A.Cofta-Broniewska(Ed.)Miejs epradziejowy hi±redniowie zny hpraktyk

kultowy hwKruszy Zamkowej,15-64.Pozna«.

1989 ThemigrationofSteppeandForest-steppeCommunitiesintoCentral

Eu-rope.TheJournalof Indo-EuropeanStudies 18:309-330.

1990 The Vistula-Oder Basins and the North Ponti Region. The Journal of

Indo-EuropeanStudies19: 235-258.

1991a Zbada«nadtzw.horyzontemstarosznurowymwrozwoju

pó¹noneolity z-nejkultryspoªe ze«stwKujaw. Folia Ar haeologi a16: 85-95.

1991b Globular Amphora ulture versus Funnel Beaker ulture. In: A.

Cofta--Broniewska(Ed.)Newtenden iesinStudiesofGlobularAmphora ulture.

Ar haeologiaInterregionalis14,87-112.Warszawa-Kraków-Pozna«.

1996 Gruparadziejowskakulturypu harówlejkowaty hjakoprologkujawskiej

enklawy naddunajskiej ywiliza ji w zesnobr¡zowej. In: A.Ko±ko(ed.) Z

bada« nad genez¡ regionalizmu kulturowego spoªe ze«stw Kujaw, 91-106.

Pozna«-Kruszwi a-Inowro ªaw.

1997 Chronologi al-geneti frameworkofthe\Ahorizon"featuresinthe

deve-lopmentof theKuiavian FBC. In:Early-CordedWareCulture.The

A-Ho-rizon| tionorfa t?(ArkaeologiskeRapporter2),125-133.Esbjerg.

Ko±koA.,V.I.Klo hko(Klo ko)

1987 L ate Neolithi omposite bow from Bo»ejewi e, Bydgosz z voivodship,

NorthernPoland andtheproblemoforientalinspirationsinthe

develop-mentofEuropeanar hery.JournaloftheSo ietyofAr her-Antiquaries30:

15-23.

(32)

1998 \Trz inie " | Borderland of Early Bronze Age Civilization of Eastern

and Western Europe? In: The Trz inie Area of the Early Bronze Age

Civilization:1950-1200BC, BPS6:190-202.

Ko±koA.,J.L anger

1986 Zbada«nadwytwarzaniemiu»ytkowaniemdzieg iuwneoli ie.Kwartalnik

HistoriiKulturyMaterialnej4:587-600.

Ko±koA.,M.Szmyt

1993 Neolity zny kompleks osadni zy na obszarze \Wzgórza Prokopiaka" w

Opatowi a h,gm.Radziejów, woj.wªo ªawskie.Staniperspektywybada«.

ZiemiaKujawska9:159-182.

KovalevaI.F.

1983 Pobrebalniyobryadiideolgiyarannikhskotovodov.Kiev.

KovalyukhN.,V.Skripkin,V.I. Klo hko,S.Lysenko

1998 Absolute (Radio arbon) Chronologyof theEastern Trz inie ulture in

theDnieperRiver. In:TheTrz inie AreaoftheEarlyBronzeAge

Civi-lization:1950-1200BC,BPS6:130-140.

KovalyukhN.N.,V.V. Skripkin,E.V.Sobotovi h

1996 Pe uliaritiesofCarbonBehavioroftheRea torGraphiteoftheChernobyl

FallOut.In:ThirdInternationalSymposiumandExhibitionon

Environmen-talContaminationinCentralandEasternEurope,731-733.Warsaw.

KovalyukhN.,M.Videiko,V.Skripkin

1995 Chronology of the emeteries of the So evka type: ar haeologi al and

isotopi one. In: Cemeteries of theSo evka type:2950-2750BC. BPS3:

135-140.

KraynovD.A.

1972 DrevneyshayaistoriyaVolgo-Okskogomezhdure hia. Moskva.

KrukJ.,S.Milisauskas

1983 Chronologiaabsolutna osadni twaneolity znego z Brono i , woj.

kiele -kie.AP28:257-320.

KrutsV.A.

1968 Novyimogilnikso yvskogotipubiliyas.ZavalovkanaDnipri.Arkheologiya

21:130-133.

1977 PozdnetripolskiyepamyatnikiSrednegoPodneprovya.Kiev.

1994 \GiantSettlements"andsomedemographi problems onne tedwiththe

TripolyeCulture.Ar heologiaPolski39:29-30.

KrutsV.A.,S.M.Ryzhov

1985 Fazyrozvytkupamyatoktomashivsko-sushkivskoygruppy.Arkheologiya51:

(33)

Kri hevskiyE.Y.

1940 Poselennia vGorodsku.In:Tripilskakultura,383-451.Kiev.

Kryvaltsevi hM.M.

1996 Graveof theMiddleDnieper ulture from ProrvaSite 1(Gomelregion,

Belorus).In:EasternexodusoftheGlobularAmphorapeople:2950-2350

BC.BPS4:98-102.

1997 Bronzavyvek.In: ArkhealogiyaBelarusi. Vol.1.Kamenny i bronzavy viaki,

288-290.Minsk.

1999 Azyarnoye1|paselish ha epokhibronzyna polna hy Palessia.Minsk.

KrzakZ.

1989 Zªota ulture.In: Zespoªydatowanemetod¡ 14

C, Przegl¡dAr heologi zny

36:255-269.

KurzawaJ.

1999 Zagadnienienajw ze±niejszy hfazkultury eramikisznurowejnaNizinieW

iel-kopolsko-Kujawskiej. Problem tªagenety znegospoªe ze«stw kultury

pu ha-rówlejkowaty h.Pozna«.

KuznetsovP.F.

1996 Noviyeradiouglerodniyedatydlyakhronologiikultureneolita-bronzovogo

vekayugalesostepnogoPovolzhya.In:ArkheologiyaiRadiouglerod1:56-59.

L agodovskayaE.F.

1953 Tripolskoyeposeleniyevs.SandrakyinekotoryevoprosypozdnegoT

ripo-lya.KSIA ANUS SR2:76-77.

L agodovskaO.

1956 Pizdnyotripillske poselennia v s. Sandrakakh. Arkheologi hni Pamyatki

US SR6:118-129.

L akizaV.L.

1997 Pakhavanneranniabronzavaga hasunaNizhniaySh hary.In:Vestki

Aka-demiiNavukBelarusi.Seryiagumanitarnykhnavuk No. 1,54-59.Minsk.

1999 ParkhutyI |novypomnikneolitui bronzavaga veku na Sh hary.

Gista-ry hna-arkhealagi hnyzbornik14:104-124.Minsk.

L angerJ.J.,A.Ko±ko

1992 Studiesontheorgani omponentsinNeolithi potterydyes.Ar haeologia

Polona30:61-68.

1999 Zbada«nadzastosowaniemdzieg iuwornamenty e eramikineolity znej.

PerspektywaNi»u Polski.Folia Prehistori aPosnaniensia9:63-78.

L angerJ.J.,S.Pietrzak

1999 Wytwarzaniei zastosowaniedzieg iuw kultura hpó¹noneolity zny h.In:

A. Ko±ko (Ed.)Ar heologi zne badania ratowni zewzdªu» trasy gazo i¡gu

(34)

L angerJ.J.,M.Szmyt

1999 Zastosowanie barwników mineralny h w zdobni twie eramiki KAK. In:

A. Ko±ko (Ed.)Ar heologi zne badania ratowni zewzdªu» trasy gazo i¡gu

tranzytowego,Vol.III Kujawy,Part4,Osadni twokulturpó¹noneolity zny h

orazinterstadiumepokneolituibr¡zu:3900-1400/1300B C.Pozna«,inprint.

Ma hnikJ.

1966 Studia nad kultur¡ eramiki sznurowej w Maªopols e. Wro ªaw-W

arszawa--Kraków.

1979a Kr¡g kulturowy eramiki sznurowej. In: W. Hensel, T. Wi±la«ski (Ed.),

Neolit,PrahistoriaZiemPolski h2:337-412

1979b Zestudiównadkultur¡ eramikisznurowejwdorze zugórnegoDniestru.

A taAr haeologi aCarpati a 19:51-77.

1997 Staniperspektywybada«kultury eramikisznurowejwmidzyrze zu

gór-nejWisªy, BuguiDniestru.SpA50: 13-29.

Ma hnikJ.,A.Pil h

1997 Zaskakuj¡ eodkry iezabytkówkultury±rodkowodnieprza«skiejw

Mªodo-wie-Zak¡ iukoªoLuba zowa, wwoj.przemyskim.SpA49:143-170.

Ma hnikJ.,E.Sosnowska.

1998 Kurhanludno± ikultury eramikisznurowejzprzeªomuIIIiIItysi¡ le ia

przed Chrystusemw Woli Wgierskiej, gm. Ro¹wieni a, woj. przemyskie

(badaniaar heologi znew1997roku).Ro znikPrzemyski34(3).

Ar heolo-gia:3-20.

Ma hnikJ.,J.‘ ibior

1991 Die Chronologie der S hnurkeramik (S hK) in S udostenpolen. In: Die

Kontinentaleuropais henGruppenderKulturmitS hnurkeramik,Praha-Stirin

1-6.10.1990.DieChronologieder regionalenGruppen, Zusammenfasungen,

45-53.FreiburgiBr.

Makarowi z P.

1998 Absolute hronologyoftheTrz inie omplexintheVistula drainage.In:

The Trz inie Area of theEarly Bronze Age Civilization: 1950-1200BC,

BPS6:141-155.

MakkayJ.

1985 Di usionism,antidi usionismand hronology:somegeneralremarks.A ta

Ar haeologi aHungari a37(1-2):3-12.

1996 C-14Chronology:EasternEurope.In:K.Randsborg(Ed.),Absolute

Chro-nology:Ar haeologi alEurope2500-500BD.A taAr haeologi a67:

219--225.

MalloryJ.P.

(35)

1989 Insear hof theIndo-Europeans.L ondon.

MalloryJ.P., D.Y.Telegin

1994 Poyava kolesnogo transportu na Ukraini za radiokarbonnymi dannymi.

In: Problemy khronologii kultur eneolita-bronzovogo veka Ukraini i

yuga--vosto hnoyEvropy,30-31.Dniepropetrovsk.

MantuC.

1997 ChronologyTable.In:Cu uteni.TheLastGreatChal olithi Civilizationof

Europe.Bukarest.

Markevi hV.I.

1981 PozdnetripolskiyeplemenaSevernoyMoldavii. Kishinev.

MonahD.

1987 L adatationpar 14

C omplexe ulturelCu uteni-Tripolie.La ivilisationde

Cu uteni en ontexteEuropen:67-79.Iasi.

MooraKh.A.

1952 PamyatnikipozdnegoneolitairanneyepokhimetallavPribaltike.KSIIMK

48:3-9.Moskva.

MovshaT.G

1964 NovoyepozdnetripolskoyeposeleniyeTsviklovtsyvSrednemPodnestrovie.

SA1:131-145.

1965 Skarb prykrasz piznyotipillskogoposelennia v s. Tsviklivtsi.Arkheologiya

18:67-74.

1970 Pozdnetripolskoyeposeleniye vs.Zhvanets.KSIA123:84-93.

1971a Osevernoygruppepozdnetripolskikhpamyatnikov.SA15(1):31-54.

1971b Gon harniytsentrtripolskoykulturyna Dnestre.SA15(3):228-234.

1972 PeriodizatsiyaikhronologiyaserednogotapiznogoTripillya.Arkheologiya

5:3-24.

1973 Gorogys hetripolskoikulturyZhvanets-S hovb,AO1973:310-311.

1984 KhronologiaTripolye-Cu uteni i stepnyekulturyrannego metalla vyego

systemie. In: Problemy arkheologii Srednego Podneprovia, part 1, 60-83.

Dnepropetrovsk.

1985a VzaemovidnosiniTripilla |Kukuteniz sinkhronnimikulturamiT

sentral-noyEvropy.Arkheologiya51:22-31.

1985b Pozdniy etapTripolskoykultury.In: ArkheologiyaUkrainskoyS SR,vol. 1,

223-253.Kiev.

1993 Vzayemovidnisinystepovukhizemlerobskikhkulturvepohueneolotu|

ranniobronzovogoviku.|Arkheologiya3:36-51.

NazarovS.V.,N.N. Kovalyukh

1999 TheKyivradio arbon alibration program.In:Ar haeometryand

(36)

NeustupnyE.

1968 Absolute hronologyof theNeolithi andAeneolithi periodsinCentral

andSouth-EasternEurope.SlovenskaAr heologia15(1):19-60.

NikolovaA.V.

1992 Khronologi heskayaklassi katsiyapamyatnikovyamnoykulturystepnoyzony

Ukrainy.Avtoreferatdissertatsiinasoiskaniyeu henoystepenikandidata

isto-ri heskikhnauk.Kiev.

NikolovaA.V.,T.I.Ma hi h

1997 Dometodykiklasy katsiiposuduYamnoykultury.Arkheologiya3:101-114.

OstroverkhovA.S.

1981 An ientprodu tionof glassbeads intheNorthernBla k-Sea area.SA4:

214-228.

1985 SteklannyjebusyvpamyatnikahpozdnegoTripolya.In:Novyematerialypo

arkheologiiSevero-ZapadnogoPri hernomorya,174-179.Kiev.

Parzinger H.

1993 Studien zur Chronologie und Kulturges hi hte der Jungstein, Kupfer- und

Fr uhbronzezeit zwis hen Karpaten und mittlerem Taurus. R 

omish-Germa-nis heFors hungenB.52.Mainzam Rhein.

Passek T.S.

1940 Tripilskakultura. Kiev.

1949 Periodizatsiyatripolskikhposeleniy.MIA110.

1962 Relationsentrel'EuropeO identaleetl'EuropeOrientalal'epoque

neo-litique.VI CongresInternationaldesS ien es Prehistoriqueset

Protohistori-ques.Lesrapportsetlesinformations dear heologuesdel'URS S.Moskva.

PatokovaE.F.

1964 UsatovskijkurganI.KSOGAM12:102-123.

1970 Raskopki Usatovskogo beskurgannogo mogilnika. In: Arkheologi heskie

otkrytiyaza1969god:230. Moskva.

1971 Raskopki Usatovskogo beskurgannogo mogilnika v 1964 g. Materialy po

arkheologijiSevernogoPri hermomorya7:201-210.Odessa.

1974 RaskopkiUsatovskogomogilnika.Arkheologi heskieotkrytiyaza 1973god:

325.Moskva.

1979 Usatovskoyeposeleniyeimogilniki.Kiev.

PatokovaE.F.,V.G.Petrenko,N.B.Burdo, L.Y.Polish huk

1989 PamyatnikitripolskoykulturyvSevero-Zapadnom Pri hernomorye.Kiev.

Pe henkinN.M.

(37)

Petrougne V.F.

1995 Petrograpi al- lihologi al hara teristi sofstonematerials fromL ate-T

ri-polye emeteriesoftheSo evkatype,In:CemeteriesoftheSo evkatype:

2950-2750BC, BPS3:190-199.

PetrovV.P.

1940 Poselennia vGorodsku.In:Tripilskakultura,339-381.Kiev.

vander Pli htJ.

1993 TheGroningenradio arbon alibrationprogram.Radio arbon35(1):

231--237.

vander Pli htJ.,W.G.Mook

1987 Automati radio arbon alibration:illustrativeexamples.Palaeohistoria29:

173-182.

vander Pli htJ.,W.G.Mooh, H.Hasper

1987 Automati Calibration ofRadio arbonAges. PACT29:81-94.

Polin S.V.,Tup henkoN.P., NikolovaA.V.

1992 KurganyverkhovyevIngultsa,1.Kiev.

1993 KurganyverkhovyevIngultsa,2.Kirovograd

1994 KurganyverkhovyevIngultsa,3.Kiev.

PopovaT.B.

1955 Plemena katakombnoy kultury. Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Istori heskogo

Muzeya24.Moskva.

PustovalovS.Z.

1992 Etni heskaya struktura katakombnogonaselenia severnogo Pri hernomorya.

Kiev.

1994 E onomyandSo ial Organizationof theNorthernPonti Steppe |

Fo-rest-SteppePastoralPopulations:2750-2000BC(Cata omb Culture). In:

Nomadism andPastoralism in theCir le of Balti -Ponti EarlyAgrarian

Cultures.BPS2:86-134.

QuittaH., G.Kohl

1969 NeueRadio arbondatenzumNeolithikumundzumBronzezeit

Sudosteu-ropasundder Sowjetunion.ZFA3:223-318.

Ra zkyP.

1995 NewData ontheAbsoluteChronologyof theCopper Ageinthe

Carpa-thianBasin.In:T.Kova s(Ed.), NeuereDatenzurSiedlungsges hi hteund

Chronologieder KupferzeitdesKarpatenbe kens,52-56.Budapest.

RamseyC.B.

1995 Radio arbon Calibration and Analysis of Stratigraphy: The OxCal

(38)

Reins hC.H,

1967 Smoothingbysplinefun tions.NumMathematik10:177-183.

RenfrewC.

1971 SitagroiRadio arbonandthePrehistoryofEurope.Antiquity45:275-282.

RimantieneR.

1984 AkmensamziusLietuvoje.Vilnius.

1994 DieSteinzeit inLitauen.Mainz amRhein.

RyndinaN.V.,L.V.Konkova

1982 Oproiskhozhdeniibolshykhusatovskikhkinzhalov.SA2:30-42.

SamoylovskiI.M.

1952 Tilospalniy mogilnikkolos.So yvka.AP4:121-123.

SementsovA.A.,E.N.Romanova,P.M. Dolukhanov

1969 RadiouglerodniyedatylaboratoriiLOIA.SA2:251-261.

SerdyukovaI.L.

1996 Contiribution to the origin of the Bronze Age in the Middle Dnieper

region. In: Easternexodus of the GlobularAmphora people: 2950-2350

BC,BPS4:133-155.

Sh hepinskyA.A.

1985 Kemi-obinskayakultura.In:ArkheologiyaUkrainskoyS SR,vol.1,331-336.

ShmagliyM.M.

1960 O planirovke pozdne tripolskikh poselenij Vosto hnoj Vilyni. KSIA AN

US SR9:52-55.

1966 Gorodsko-volinskiyvariant piznyotripilskoykultury. Arkheologiya 20:

15--37.

1971 Pamiatkigorodskogotypu.ArkheologiyaUS SR1:205-210.Kiev.

ShternE.P.

1906 Dogre heskayakulturanayugeRossii.In:TrudyArkheologi heskogosyezda

vYekaterinislave v1905g.,vol.1:9-95.

Siemen P.

1991 ProblemsoftheSingleGraveCulture(EGK).In:DieKontinentaleu-rop

ai--s henGruppenderKulturmitS hnurkeramik,Praha-Stirin1-6.10.1990.Die

ChronologiederregionalenGruppen.Zusammenfasungen, 89-95.Freiburgi

Br.

SkripkinV.V.,N.N.Kovalyukh

1998 Re entDevelopments inthePro eduresUsed attheSSCERL aboratory

fortheRoutinePreparationofLithiumCarbide.Radio arbon40:211-214.

SmirnovA.M.

(39)

StruveK.

1955 DieEinzelgrabkulturinS hleswig-Holsteinundihre kontinentalen

Beziehun-gen.Neum unster.

StuiverM., J.vanderPli htJ. (Eds.)

1998 INTCAL98.Radio arbon40(3):1041-1084.

SulimirskiT.

1959 Polskaprzedhistory zna,t.2(1957-1959),L ondyn.

1968 CordedWare andGlobularAmphoraeNorth-Eastof theCarpathians. L

on-don.

1970 Prehistori Russia.An outline.L ondon.

SveshnikovI.K.

1974 IstoriyanaselennyaPeredkarpattya,PodillaiVolinivkin iIII|napo hatku

IItys.don.e.Kiev.

1983 Kulturasharovidnykhamfor.SvodArkheologi heskikhisto hnikov,vyp.B

1-27.Moskva.

SzmytM.

1996a Spoªe zno± ikulturyamforkulisty hna Kujawa h. Pozna«.

1996b GlobularAmphora ulture in EasternEurope. Present state of resear h

and possibilities for future studies. In: Eastern exodus of the Globular

Amphorapeople: 2950-2350BC. BPS4:3-27.

1998 Die Kugelamphorenkulturunddie Gemeins haften derSteppen-Wald |

undSteppenzone Osteuropas. Der Fors hungsstandund

Fors hungsper-spektiweninGrundri.In:B.Hansel,J.Ma hnik [Eds.℄Das

Karpatenbe -kenundOsteuropais heSteppe.NomadenundKulturaustau hin

vor hristli-s henMetallzeiten(4000-500v.Chr.), 221-231.M un hen.

1999a Osadni twoludno± i kulturyamforkulisty h. In:A. Ko±ko (Ed.)

Ar he-ologi zne badania ratowni ze wzdªu» trasy gazo i¡gu tranzytowego,Vol. III

Kujawy,Part4,Osadni twokulturpó¹noneolity zny horazinterstadiumepok

neolituibr¡zu:3900-1400/1300B C.Pozna«.

1999b Between West and East. Globular Amphora people in Eastern Europe,

BPS8,inprint.

2000 TheAbsolute(Radio arbon)ChronologyoftheCentralandEasternGroup

oftheGlobularAmphoraCulture.In:J.Czebreszuk,J.M uller(Eds.)The

3rdMillennium B Cin CentralEurope in theLight of 14

C Dates.

Pozna«--Berlin,inprint.

‘ ibiorJ.

1992 Die S hnurkeramikkultur in der Sandomierz-Opatów-L ozone. In: Die

Kontinentaleuropais henGruppenderKulturmitS hnurkeramik,

Praehi-stori a19:255-264.

(40)

‘ ibiorJ.,J.M.‘ ibior

1992 Gróbkultury eramiki sznurowej(KCS) na stanowisku59 w Zªotej. SpA

44:99-107.



SebelaL.

1991 Die Chronologie der S hnurkeramik in Mahren. In: Die

Kontinentaleu-ropais henGruppenderKulturmitS hnurkeramik,Praha-Stirin1-6.10.1990.

DieChronologie der regionalen Gruppen. Zusammenfasungen, 23-28.

Fre-iburgiBr.

TeleginD.Y.

1977 Obabsolyutnomvozrasteyamnoykulturyinekotoriyevoporsykhronologii

eneolitaYugaUkrainy.SA2:5-19.

1985 Radiokarbonne ta arkheomagnitne datuvannya tripilskoykultury.

Arkhe-ologiya52:10-22

1992 Obabsolyutnomvozrastekatakombnoykulturyporadiouglerodnym

opre-deleniyam. In: Noviye otkrytyai metodologi heskiyeosnovy

arkheologi he-skoykhronologii,68-73.St.Peterburg.

1994 ObrazzmeelokoiboginivTripolie: Drevneishieobsh hnostizemledeltzev

i skotovodovSevernogo Pri hernomoriya V tys. don.e. { Vv. do n.e.{

MaterialyMezdunarodnoi arkheologi heskoikonferen ii.Tiraspol:73-74.

TeleginD.Y., E.V.Sobotovi h,N.N. Kovalyu h

1978 Radiouglerodnoye datirovaniye arkheologi heskikh materialov. In:

Ispol-zovaniyemetodovyestestvennykhnaukvarkheologii,55-61.Kiev.

1981 Ob absolyutnomvozrastepamyatnikov arkheologiiUkrainy i nekotory h

smezhny hterritoriypodannymradiokarbonnykhanalizov. In:

Ispolzova-niyemetodovyestestvennykhnaukv arkheologii,78-84.Kiev.

Titov V.S.

1965 Rolradiouglerodnykhdatvkhronologiineolitaibronzovogoveka

Pered-neyAziii yugo-vosto hnoyEvropy.In:Arkheologiyaiyestestvennyenauki,

14-16.Moskva.

Tosh hevG.N.

1991 Zapadnyyarealpamyatnikovkatakombnoykultury.In:Katakombnyye

kul-turySevernogoPri hernomorya,85-100. Kiev.

TrifonovV.A.

1996 K absolutnomu datirovaniyu \mikenskogo" ornamenta epokhi razvitoy

bronzyEvrazii. In:ArkheologiyaiRadiouglerod1:60-64.

TuniaK.

1979 Cmentarzyskokultury eramikisznurowej wKoniuszy,woj. Kraków.SpA

(41)

VasilevI.G.,P.F.Kuznetsov,A.P.Semenova

1992 Pogrebeniyaznatiepo hibronzyvSrednemPovolzhe.In:Arkheolgi heskiye

vesti1:52-63.St.Peterburg.

VideikoM.Y.

1989 P ytannyakhronologijimidnigoviky.Arkheologiya3:107-111.

1990 Khronologiyaarkheologi hnykh pamyatokmidnogoviku.Arkheologiya3:

107-111.

1991 P ytannyaabsolyutnoykhronologydavnoyistoriiUkrainy.In:Problemy

vi-v henniataokhoronypamyatokarkheologiiKievs hyny,25-27.Kiev.

1994 Tripolye | \Pastoral" onta ts. Fa ts and hara ter of the intera tions:

4800-3200BC.In:Nomadismandpastoralisminthe ir leofBalti -Ponti

earlyagrarian ultures:5000-1650BC, BPS2:5-28.

1995 Cemeteries of the So evka type. Field resear h, state of publi ation of

sour es and general position in the systemati s of Trypolye ulture. In:

Cemeteries oftheSo evkatype:2950-2750,BPS3:3-14.

We hlerK.P.

1994 Zur Chronologie der Tripolje-Cu uteni-Kultur aufgrund von 14

C-Datie-rungen.Zeits hrift f urAr haologie28:7-21.

WarrenP.

1980 ProblemsofChronologyinCreteandtheAegeanintheThirdandEarlier

Se ondMillenium BC.AJA84,No.4:487-499.

Weninger, B.

1986 High-pre ision alibration of ar haeologi al radio arbon dates. In: A ta

Interdis iplinariaAr haeologi aIV,11-53.Nitra.

1993 Radio arbonCalibration

<

alKN

>

. April 1993. Dendroand Ar haeolo-gi alWiggleMat hing. K oln.

Wªodar zakP.

1998 Chronologiaabsolutna grupy krakowsko-sandomierskiejkultury eramiki

sznurowejnapodstawiedany hz mentarzyskw›ernika hGórny h.SpA

50:31-54.

Wªodar zakP., H.Kowalewska-Marszaªek

1998 Datowanie bezwzgldne zespoªu kultury pu harówdzwonowaty hz

San-domierza,SpA50:55-82.

YakarJ.

1979 TroyandAnatolianEarly Bronze Age Chronology.AnatolianStudies 29:

23-69.

YanitsL.Y.

1952 Pozdneneoliti heskiyemogilnikivEstonskoySSR.In:KSIIMK42:55-57.

(42)

ZakharukY.N.

1971 Tripilskakultura.In:ArkheologiyaUkrainskoyRSR,vol.1,177-179.Kiev.

ZakharukY.M.

1952 So ivskitilopalnimogilnik.AP 4:112-120

ZakharukJ.M., V.A.Kruts

1963 Raskopki pozdnetripolskogoposelenia us.So evka Borispolskogoraiona

Kievskoyoblasti.NAIANANU, FondEkspedi ij4410-4414-1963/8a.

Zbenovi hV.G.

1964 Raskopkibeskurgannogomogilnika vs.Usatovo.KSOGAM 37-45.

1971 Pamyatky usativskogotypu.In: ArkheologiyaUkrainskoy RSR, vol.1,

187--193.Kiev.

1974 PozdnetripolskiyeplemenaSevernogoPri henomorya.Kiev.

1976a KproblemesviazeyTripolyaseneoliti heskimikulturamiPri hernomorya.

In:EneolitibronzoviyvekUkrainy,57-59.Kiev.

1976b PozdneyeTripolyeiyegosvyazskulturamiPrikarpatyaiMalopolshi.A ta

Ar haeologi aCarpati a16:21-58.

(43)

IvanI.Chernyakov

InstituteofAr haeology

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

GeroivStalingrada12

254655Kiev

Ukraine

ElkeKaiser

Seminarf urUr-undFrehgesi hte

FreieUniversitatBerlin

Altensteinstrae15

14195Berlin

Germany

ViktorI.Klo hko

InstituteofAr haeology

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

GeroivStalingrada12

254655Kiev

Ukraine

AleksanderKo±ko

InstituteofPrehistory

AdamMi kiewi zUniversity

±w.Mar in78

61-809Pozna«

Poland

E-mail:koskomman.poznan .pl

NikolayN.Kovalyukh

DepartmentofEnvironmentalRadiogemistry

InstituteofGeo hemistry

andPhysi sofMinerals

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

Palladina34

252142Kiev

Ukraine

VladimirA.Kruts

InstituteofAr haeology

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

GeroivStalingrada12

254655Kiev

Ukraine

MykolaN.Kryvaltsevi h

InstituteofHistory

A ademyofS ien esofBelarus

F.Skaryna1

Minsk220072

Belarus

VadimL.L akiza

InstituteofHistory

A ademyofS ien esofBelarus

F.Skaryna1

Minsk220072

Belarus

JanMa hnik

InstituteofAr haeologyandEtnology

PolishA ademyofS ien es

Sªawkowska19

31-016Kraków

Poland

SergeyV.Nazarov

DepartmentofEnvironmentalRadiogemistry

InstituteofGeo hemistry

andPhysi sofMinerals

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

Palladina34

252142Kiev

Ukraine

AllaV.Nikolova

InstituteofAr haeology

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

GeroivStalingrada12

254655Kiev

Ukraine

VadimV.Skripkin

DepartmentofEnvironmentalRadiogemistry

InstituteofGeo hemistry

andPhysi sofMinerals

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

Palladina34

252142Kiev

Ukraine

MarzenaSzmyt

InstituteofEasternStudies

AdamMi kiewi zUniversity

Nowowiejskiego55

61-734Pozna«

Poland

E-mail:marzenamain.am u.e du. pl

MihailoY.Videiko

InstituteofAr haeology

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

Vydubi kaya40

252014Kiev

Ukraine

(44)

Vol.2:NomadismandPastoralismintheCir leofBalti {Ponti EarlyAgrarian

Cultures: 5000{1650B C,editedbyAleksanderKo±ko

Vol.3: CemeteriesoftheSo evkatype:2950{2750B C, editedbyAleksander

Ko±ko

Vol.4: Eastern Exodus of the Globular Amphora People: 2950 - 2350 B C,

editedbyAleksanderKo±ko.

Vol.5: BeyondBalkanization,edited byLu ynaDoma«ska,KenJa obs and

Aleksander Ko±ko.

Vol.6:TheTrz inie AreaoftheEarlyBronzeAgeCivilization:1950{1200B C,

editedbyAleksanderKo±ko.

Orders regardingB-PS should beadressed dire tlyto theEditorialOÆ e

(Balti -Ponti Studies,InstituteofPrehistory,‘w.Mar in78,61-809Pozna«,

Poland).

Thepubli ationsis arriedoutwithintheresear hproje tNo.1H01G05912

(in part No. 1H01G01810) nan ed in the years 1997{1999 by the

(45)

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

• Corporaties moeten focussen

This manuscript has been accepted for publication in the Bulletin of the History of Medicine (Johns Hopkins University Press) on 10 September 2020.. In sickness and

From 1956 onwards, the delivery of family planning advice became a priority for both the Polish Catholic Church and the party-state, especially its health authorities,

A method proposed for obtaining the location of a near-surface scatterer by using traveltimes of ghost (non-physical) scattered waves is applied to data from an ultrasonic

W latach sześćdziesiątych rozpoczyna się stopniowe dowartościowywanie zagadnień związanych z organami: pojawia się świadomość wartości organów zabytkowych (nie

(2007) applied quartz optical dating using the SAR method to 22 samples from coversand deposits at the Grubbenvorst type locality (southern Netherlands).. Optical ages are

Several authors (e.g. V OGEL 1983, V OGEL &amp; K RONFELD 1997) explained the difference by changes of atmospheric radiocarbon concentration in the past, and in fact, used

Dates of shells from the erosional layer separating con- tinental Interpleniglacial sediments from marine sands on the northern slope of the Odra Bank (profiles 47,50 and