• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Deformations of actions of linearly reductive groups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Deformations of actions of linearly reductive groups"

Copied!
3
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

ANNALES SOCIETATIS M ATHEMATICAE POLON A E Series I: COM M ENTATIONES M ATHEMATICAE XXII (1980) R O CZN IKI PO LSK IEG O TOWARZYSTWA MATEM ATYCZNEGO

Séria I: PRACE M ATEMATYCZNE XXII (1980)

Ma r iu sz Ko r a s

(Warszawa)

Deformations of actions of linearly reductive groups

Let G be an algebraic group. By an algebraic family of actions of G on an algebraic variety X parametrized by an algebraic variety T we mean a family {(pt}teT of actions of G on X , such that the map (t , g>, x ) h> q>t{g, x) of T x G x X into X is regular. Two families {(pt}teT and {ф(}геТ~аге equivalent iff there exists an algebraic family {ht}teT of automorphisms X such that

<Pt(g, ht (x)) = КФг(д> x) for every g, t, x.

A family is trivial iff it is equivalent to the constant family. We say that the action <pt is a deformation of the action cp2 iff there exists an algebraic family of actions of G on X , parametrized by an connected variety, which contains (pl and q>2.

In the differential case, every differential family of actions of a compact Lie group on a compact manifold parametrized by [0, 1] is trivial (R. S. Palais and T. Stewart [3]).

In this note we shall show that if G is linearly reductive group, X is a complete variety, then every deformation of (p is equivalent to q>, and if t0e T is non-singular, then the family is trivial over an etale neighbour­

hood of t0.

All considered algebraic varieties and their morphisms are defined over an algebraically closed field k.

It is known (H. Matsumura, F. Oort [2]), that for X complete, Aut X has a natural structure of an algebraic group (in general with infinitely many connected components).

Le m m a

1. Let G be an affine group and X a complete variety. Let {(pt}t€T be an algebraic family of actions of G on X parametrized by a connected variety T. Let ht: G -*■ Aut X denote the homomorphism induced by the action (pt. Then there exists an affine subgroup H a Aut X such that V ht (G) c= H,

t e T

P roof. There exists an affine, closed, normal, connected subgroup of Aut X which contains all connected affine subgroups of Aut X , [4]. T x G

6 — Prace Matematyczne 22.1

(2)

82 M. K o r a s

has finitely many irreducible components thus (J ht(G) has non-empty

t e T

intersection with only finitely many cosets of H 1 in Aut X . Then the union of such the cosets is an affine subgroup which contains all ht (G).

Le m m a

2. Let G be linearly reductive and let Y be an affine non-singular variety. Let T be a curve. Assume that G acts on T x Y in such a way that for every g the diagram

g: T x Y~-> T x Y

4 ^

T

commutes. Let x0 = (t0, y 0) be a fixed point o f the action. Then there exists an open neighbourhood U of t0 such that for t e U the induced action on {t} x Y has a fixed point.

P roof. We may assume that T is affine and non-singular by taking T'-normalization T and the induced action on V x Y. Let p: T x Y -> T be the projection. Ker dp\Xo is a G-invariant subspace of the tangent space TXQ( T x Y ) . There exists a G-invariant subspace W such that TXQ( T x Y )

= ker dp\x ® W. We can find a G-invariant irreducible closed subvariety X а: T x Y such that x 0 e X , TXQ(X) = W and x 0 is non-singular on X, cf. [1]. Since G acts trivially on W, G acts trivially on X. Since d(p\x)\X0:

W T t0(T) is an isomorphism, p\x is etale in some neighbourhood V of x0. Thus U = p(V) has the required property.

Th e o r e m.

Let G be an affine linearly reductive group. Let X , T and {<ptjteT be as in Lemma 1, let t0 e T. Then for every t e T the actions <ptQ and (pt are equivalent, i.e. there exists an automorphism h: X -> X satisfying h<pt0{g,x) = (pt (g,hx). I f T is non-singular at t0, then the family {<р,},бГ IS trivial over some etale neighbourhood o f t0.

P roof. Let ht: G -*■ Aut X be the homomorphism induced by q>t. By Lemma 1, there exists an affine subgroup Я <= Aut X such that V ü,(G) с Я.

t e T

We define an algebraic family {«At},6r of actions of G on Я by ipt( g , f )

— К (g~1) o f o h t (g). Let t xeT. Then there exists a connected curve V in T containing t0 and tx. By Lemma 2, there exists an open subset Ut T containing t0 such that, for every t e UtQ, \j/t has a fixed point.

This implies that the actions (ptQ and <pt for t e UtQ are equivalent. Similarly, for every t e T , there exists an open Ut c= T such that q>t and tpu for u e U t are equivalent. Thus (ptQ and (ptl are equivalent.

Assume now that T is non-singular at t0. Then there exists Y c T x H such that the projection Y -*■ T is an etale morphism in some neighbour­

hood Y' of t0 and G acts trivially on Y. Thus, the induced family of actions

of G on Я over Y' has a section Y ' - * ( Y ' x H ) G. Therefore this family

is trivial.

(3)

Lineary reductive groups 83

Assumption about linear reductivity of G is essential. For example, let us consider the family {(pt}t A1 of actions of the additive group k + on P l , where <pt(g, {Уо, У1}) — {У

о

+ 9^1

у

У

1

} ■ Then q>0 is the trivial action and is not equivalent to any q>t for t Ф 0.

Open Question.

Let {(pt}teT be an algebraic family of actions of G on an affine variety X = Spec A , where A is a finitely generated /c-algebra.

This family induces the family {ф(}{еТ of actions of G on A. Is it true, that for every a e A there exists a finite dimensional vector subspace in A, containing a and ф{-invariant for every tl

If the answer is positive, then one can prove the above theorem in the case where X is affine.

References

[1] A. B ia ly n ic k i-B ir u la , Some theorems on actions of algebraic groups, Ann. of Math. 98, 3 (1973).

[2] H. M a tsu m u ra , F. O o rt, Representability of group tiÿctors and automorphisms of algebraic schemes, Inventiones Math. 4 (1967/68).

[3] R. S. P a la is, T. S te w a r t, Deformations of compact differentiable transformation groups, Amer. J. Math. 82 (1961).

[4] M. R o s e n lic h t, Some basic theorems on algebraic groups, Amer. J. Math. 78(19“56).

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Given an odd number m there exists a nonorientable Klein surface with maximal symmetry of algebraic genus q m = 2m 3 + 1 whose automorphism group G m is a soluble M ∗ -group of

The problem of describing up to a unitary equivalence, all operators A, B ∈ L(H) satisfying (1) is “wild” in most cases (see Theorem 1.4), i.e., it contains as a subproblem the

The corresponding problem for compact orientable Klein surfaces was solved by Maclachlan [5].. By a compact Klein surface without boundary we mean a compact

Moreover, a direct proof of the well-known fact that the set of ergodic automorphisms is nowhere dense in the strong topology is given.. Notations and

For other multiplicity free actions of a reductive group G on an irre- ducible G-module V we construct examples of coherent desingularizations of every orbit closure in V

For this reason we can view the ring WOK as a subring of the W i t t ring of K and we will identify it with the kernel of 8K- This gives us the possibility to use classical

These constructions are usually based on several important types of automorphisms like rooted auto- morphisms, directed automorphisms or automorphisms defined by finite state

We prove that if a countable Abelian group A satisfies Thouvenot’s conjec- ture then for any of its Gaussian actions on a standard Borel space the entropy is either zero or