• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Show that v restricted to F alg is trivial as well.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Show that v restricted to F alg is trivial as well."

Copied!
1
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Berkovich spaces, Problem List 7

Let (U, v, Γ) be a “monster model” of ACVF, (k, v| k , Γ k ) ≺ U and V ⊆ U n be an irreducible affine algebraic variety defined over k.

1. Show that for any semi-norm v 0 on k[V ] extending v| k there is a type p ∈ S V (k) such that v p = v 0 / ∼.

2. Assume that F ⊂ k is a subfield such that v restricted to F is trivial.

Show that v restricted to F alg is trivial as well.

3. Let p ∈ S V (k). Show that if for all finite-dimensional k-vector sub- spaces E < k[V ] the following sets are k-definable

{e ∈ E | v p (e) = 0}, {e ∈ E | v p (e) 6 1};

then the type p is definable.

4. Let p ∈ S V (k) and f : V → Γ be a definable function. Show that the following conditions are equivalent.

(a) The function f is generically constant on p.

(b) The function f is constant on p U . (c) f (p U ) ⊆ Γ k .

(d) f (p U ) ∩ Γ k 6= ∅.

5. Assume that v(K) ⊆ R >0 . Show that the map (defined during the lecture)

π : V an → S V (k) is continuous.

6. Assume that v(K) ⊆ R >0 and assume that p ∈ S A

1

(k) is in the image of the map

π : A 1 Berk → S A

1

(k).

Show that the following conditions are equivalent.

• p is definable,

• p is of type (1) or p is of type (2).

1

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

The larger segment W is also a twisted square based prism, but the sections W t are obtained by rotating the base with angle velocity φ/2 over the t-interval [0, 2π/φ]... By

Therefore, Theorem 4.3 may be generalized to all line graphs of multigraphs which possess maximal matchable subsets of vertices – for example, the line graphs of multigraphs

Hedetniemi, Defending the Roman Empire, principal talk presented at the Ninth Quadrennial International Conference on Graph Theory, Combina- torics, Algorithms, and

The proposed Heuristic of Alternatives (HoA) chooses parameters to the active set on the basis of not only SVM optimization conditions, but also on the basis of objective function

We present the full proofs of Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 for two reasons: firstly, since given functions are constant on the boundary and their complex Monge-Amp`ere measure is also

[r]

Show that any maximal ideal of A is

[r]