• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Influence of exercise training on leptin levels in patients with stable coronary artery disease: A pilot study

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Influence of exercise training on leptin levels in patients with stable coronary artery disease: A pilot study"

Copied!
5
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Copyright © 2010 Via Medica ISSN 1897–5593

Address for correspondence: Magdalena Kosydar-Piechna, MD, Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Alpejska 42, 04–628 Warszawa, Poland, tel: +48 22 343 44 08, fax: +48 22 343 45 19, e-mail: mkosydar@ikard.pl

Received: 5.11.2009 Accepted: 12.03.2010

Influence of exercise training on leptin levels in patients with stable coronary artery disease: A pilot study

Magdalena Kosydar-Piechna1, Maria Bilińska1, Jadwiga Janas2, Ryszard Piotrowicz1

1Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

2Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

Abstract

Background: This study was designed to examine the influence of exercise training on leptin levels in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: Sixty-four male patients, mean age 55.6 ± 6.0 years, were randomized either to six weeks of aerobic training, three times a week, at 60–80% of maximal heart rate (training group, Ex, n = 32) or to a control group (n = 32). Exercise stress test was performed and body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist circumference and plasma leptin levels were measured at the beginning and end of the study.

Results: Physical capacity increased significantly only in Ex patients (max workload in METs from 7.7 ± 1.4 to 8.2 ± 1.4, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between initial and final results in either group in terms of BMI, WHR or waist circumference.

Although, at the end of the study, leptin levels did not change in Ex patients (6.7 ± 3.2 vs 6.9 ± 3.6 ng/mL, NS), they did increase significantly in the control group (8.0 ± 4.0 vs 9.3 ±

± 5.2 ng/mL, p < 0.02).

Conclusions: A short period of exercise training in CAD patients improved their physical capacity, but did not influence BMI, WHR and waist circumference. Exercise training pre- vented an increase in leptin levels during the study period. (Cardiol J 2010; 17, 5: 477–481) Key words: coronary artery disease, exercise training, leptin levels

Introduction

Adipose tissue, as an active endocrine organ, releases proteins termed adipokines, including a hor- mone known as leptin. It has been established that increased leptin levels are common in obese and dia- betic patients and independently associated with in- sulin resistance [1], cardiovascular diseases [2, 3], and low-grade chronic inflammation in humans [4, 5].

To date, the influence of regular physical ac- tivity on leptin levels has been examined in healthy subjects as well as in obese and diabetic patients.

The effects of exercise training on leptin le- vels in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are unknown. Therefore, the aim of this pilot study was to assess the influence of six- weeks of exer- cise training on leptin levels in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

(2)

Methods

We enrolled consecutive male patients < 65 ye- ars, with stable CAD, who had been referred for our exercise training program between 1 January and 31 December 2007. We excluded patients with heart failure, unstable angina, diabetes mellitus, un- controlled arrhythmias, poorly controlled hyperten- sion, hemodynamically significant valvular heart disease, those with chronic inflammatory, autoim- mune, neoplastic, or other systemic diseases, chronic hepatic or kidney diseases. All the patients were clinically stable at least one month before their inclusion in the program, without any changes in medical treatment. The subjects received standard medications such as statin, aspirin, beta-blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. The dos- es of medications were not changed during the study period. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee. Afterwards, a written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

The patients were randomized into two groups:

training group (Ex) and control group. Ex patients agreed to participate in our training program. The baseline evaluation included clinical history and examination, resting electrocardiogram, chest X-ray, two-dimensional echocardiogram, blood chemistry (total and high- and low-density lipopro- tein cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting and post- prandial glucose levels, and liver and kidney func- tion tests), We defined patients as non-smokers when they had not smoked tobacco for at least one year. All the patients were advised to follow a diet containing limited amounts of fat and high-carbo- hydrate foods, and not to change the diet during the study protocol.

Anthropometry

Fasting body weight and height were measured (B 150 L, Axis, Poland) in all participants wearing only underclothes, without shoes. Height was mea- sured without shoes to within an accuracy of 1 cm.

Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was measured as a ratio of the circumference of the waist [cm] to that of the hips [cm]. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as [kg/m²].

Blood sampling and laboratory measurements

All the participants were told to avoid vigor- ous exercise for four days before blood sampling.

Blood samples were collected between 8 and 10am

after an overnight fast. EDTA was added to whole blood for plasma preparation. The parameters of blood chemistry e.g. glucose, lipids, etc. were mea- sured in fresh plasma by standard methods. Plas- ma samples for leptin measurement were immedi- ately centrifuged (2,000 rpm for 10 min), decanted and frozen at temperature –70°C. Leptin concentra- tion in plasma samples was quantified using Human Leptin RIA (RadioImmunoAssay) kit from Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, Missouri, USA. Sensi- tivity of the assay was 0.5 ng/mL. Intra- and inter- assay coefficients of variation were 4.6% and 6.2%, respectively.

Exercise stress testing

Each subject performed a symptom-limited maximal exercise treadmill test according to the modified Bruce protocol. Blood pressure was moni- tored by using mercurial sphygnomanometer and a 12-lead ECG was recorded at rest, every minute during exercise and during recovery, until heart rate (HR) and ECG returned to the baseline values (us- ing the modified Mason-Likar 12-lead system, Mar- quette Case 12; Marquette Electronics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA). All treadmill tests were super- vised by a cardiologist. The main reasons of stop- ping the tests were reaching the age-adjusted limit of HR and/or fatigue. None of the tests were dis- continued because of signs of ischemia in ECG and/

/or angina. The following parameters were analyzed:

duration and distance of exercise stress test, work- load in metabolic equivalents (METs), HR at rest and at peak exercise (max HR).

Exercise training program

Ex group patients underwent a six-week con- trolled, standardized exercise training program on bicycle ergometer, three times a week. Each ses- sion included a ten-minute warm-up, 40 minutes of cycling with telemetry monitoring (the intensity set at 60% at the beginning of the exercise program was progressively increased to 80% of peak HR mea- sured during exercise stress testing), and a ten- minute cool-down. The training was documented by a written protocol.

Cardiac rhythm was continuously monitored on a three-channel telemetry system in all trained pa- tients and in all sessions throughout the study. No patient left the program at any point during the study.

Patients in the control group were advised to walk at least three times per week for 30 minutes during the study period.

(3)

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SAS statistical software (Version 9.2, Cary, North Caro- lina, USA). Values are expressed as mean ± stan- dard deviation for normally distributed variables.

Normal distribution was evaluated by the Shapiro- -Wilk test. The difference in mean values was com- pared with Student’s t-test, either the unpaired one to detect differences between groups, or the paired one to detect differences within each group over time.

Comparisons of non-normally distributed data were carried out using the Wilcoxon rank test.

A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statisti- cally significant.

Results Baseline results

No significant differences were found between Ex and control groups regarding age, number of smokers, presence of hypertension, history of myo- cardial infarction or left ventricular ejection fraction (Table 1). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of baseline metabolic parameters considered or BMI (Table 2). Similar- ly, HR at rest and at peak exercise as well as METs were comparable between the two groups at the beginning of the study (Table 3). Moreover, at the initial evaluation, leptin levels did not differ signif- icantly between the two groups (Table 2).

Final results

Sixty-four patients completed the study. No adverse events occurred in either group during the study period. As shown in Table 2, no significant differences were found between the two groups in

any of the analyzed metabolic parameters. More- over, BMI, WHR and waist circumference were stable and did not change significantly in either study group during the study period. After six weeks, exercise duration and distance improved significantly in both study groups (Table 3). How- ever, in the Ex group only, maximal workload in METs increased significantly (7.7 ± 1.4 vs 8.2 ± Table 1. Study population.

Characteristic Exercise Control P

group group

(n = 32) (n = 32)

Age (years) 54.0 ± 4.8 54.5 ± 5.6 NS CAD (years) 3.9 ± 4.6 2.8 ± 3.7 NS

History MI 20 (62%) 19 (58%) NS

Non-smokers 28 (87%) 27 (83%) NS

Smokers 4 (13%) 5 (17%) NS

Hypertension 25 (78%) 25 (78%) NS Coronary

angiography:

1 vessel 5 (16%) 5 (16%) NS

2 vessels 11 (34%) 7 (22%) NS

3 vessels 16 (50%) 20 (62%) NS Medication:

Beta-blocker 32 (100%) 32 (100%) NS

ACE-I 30 (94%) 30 (94%) NS

AT II blocker 3 (9%) 2 (6%) NS Statins 32 (100%) 32 (100%) NS

Aspirin 31 (98%) 31 (98%) NS

Clopidogrel/ 2 (6%) 2 (6%) NS

/ticlopidine

LVEF (%) 60.0 ± 7.5 56.8 ± 8.9 NS

CAD — coronary artery disease; MI — myocardial infarction; ACE-I

— angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; AT II blocker — angio- tensin II receptor blocker; LVEF — left ventricular ejection fraction;

NS — non significant

Table 2. Metabolic parameters at baseline and at the end of the study.

Variables Exercise group (n = 32) Control group (n = 32)

Baseline Final Baseline Final

Body mass index [kg/m²] 27.3 ± 2.8 27.4 ± 2.8 28.0 ± 3.2 28.4 ± 3.6

Waist circumference [cm] 95.8 ± 7.0 96.0 ± 8.4 99.6 ± 7.6 99.8 ± 7.5

Waist-to-hip ratio 1.02 ± 0.05 1.01 ± 0.05 1.03 ± 0.05 1.03 ± 0.06

Total cholesterol [mmol/L] 3.9 ± 0.7 3.8 ± 0.8 4.1 ± 0.6 4.2 ± 1.0

HDL cholesterol [mmol/L] 1.3 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.5 1.3 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.3

LDL cholesterol [mmol/L] 2.4 ± 0.8 2.3 ± 0.7 2.6 ± 0.8 2.6 ± 0.7

Triglycerides [mmol/L] 1.3 ± 0.6 1.4 ± 0.7 1.4 ± 0.7 1.5 ± 0.9

Fasting glucose [mmol/L] 5.1 ± 0.7 5.1 ± 0.7 5.2 ± 0.7 5.2 ± 0.6

Post-prandial glucose [mmol/L] 5.5 ± 1.5 5.6 ± 1.6 5.7 ± 1.8 5.6 ± 1.5

Leptin [ng/mL] 6.7 ± 3.2 6.9 ± 3.6 8.0 ± 4.0 9.3 ± 5.2*

All results are presented as mean ± SD; *p < 0.05

(4)

± 1.4, p < 0.03) compared to the control patients (7.3 ± 1.8 vs 7.7 ± 1.9, p = NS; Table 3).

Although, at the end of the study, leptin levels increased significantly only in the control patients (15% vs 2% in Ex group), there were no signifi- cant statistical differences between the two study groups (Table 2).

Discussion

This preliminary study aimed to investigate the effect of short-term exercise training on plasma leptin concentrations in stable CAD patients with preserved left ventricular function.

We found that our supervised exercise-train- ing program improved physical capacity and did not affect leptin levels. On the contrary, in control pa- tients, home-based activity e.g. walking did not change physical capacity measured in METs and caused an unfavorable increase in leptin levels.

Leptin is secreted by adipose tissue and its concentration in humans is known to correlate with weight, BMI [6] and body fat mass [7–9]. Moreover, leptin is thought to exert many potentially proat- herogenic effects such as induction of endothelial cell dysfunction [10] and platelet aggregation [11], stimulation of inflammatory reactions [4, 5], propa- gation of oxidative stress [12], and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells [13].

To date, the influence of exercise training on leptin levels has been examined only in healthy, obese or diabetic patients. The majority of these studies have documented that short-term exercise training does not affect leptin levels.

However, Ishii et al. [14] showed that in type 2 diabetic patients, exercise training reduced plasma leptin levels, which was independent of changes in body fat mass.

Ours was the first study to show the influence of short aerobic training on leptin levels in patients

with CAD. It should be emphasized that BMI, WHR and waist circumference did not change sig- nificantly in either of our study groups. Thus, we can conclude that an increase in plasma leptin con- centration in the control patients was not asso- ciated with changes in weight or waist circumfe- rence. Since a significant increase of physical ca- pacity measured in METs was observed only in the trained patients. We suggest that only a properly applied training program is able to prevent an in- crease in leptin level in optimally treated, clinically stable CAD patients.

Our findings, although promising, require con- firmation on a larger number of patients to deter- mine whether exercise training has a beneficial impact on leptin levels. In addition, the mechanism of favorable influence of exercise training on leptin levels deserves further investigation.

It might be of great importance, because se- veral clinical studies have demonstrated that high leptin levels predicted the development of acute cardiovascular events, restenosis after coronary angioplasty and cerebral stroke, independently of traditional risk factors [2, 15, 16].

Limitations of the study

When interpreting our findings, one should take into account that this was a small, short-du- ration pilot study aimed only at determining whether exercise training had any impact on lep- tin levels. Our study did not assess the percent- age of body fat. However, Flegal et al. [17] showed that it positively correlated with waist circumfer- ence in men, which was measured in our patients.

We did not include women in this study because it is widely recognized that leptin levels are se- veral times higher in women that in men, indepen- dently of fat mass content, suggesting that fe- males have higher leptin levels per unit fat mass [18, 19].

Table 3. Parameters during exercise stress test at baseline and at the end of the study.

Variables Exercise group (n = 32) Control group (n = 32)

Baseline Final Baseline Final

Duration [s] 759.8 ± 96.8 830.1 ± 74.7* 750.5 ± 102.8 781.0 ± 136.5*

Distance [m] 672.7 ± 135.5 778.7 ± 117.8* 644.1 ± 152.3 717.6 ± 164.2*

Metabolic equivalents 7.7 ± 1.4 8.2 ± 1.4* 7.3 ± 1.8 7.7 ± 1.9

Heart rate at rest [bpm] 68.1 ± 11.3 62.9 ± 10.5* 65.1 ± 9.4 64.2 ± 8.2 Max heart rate [bpm] 125.9 ± 15.2 124.8 ± 15.6 121.2 ± 16.7 125.4 ± 15.3

All results are presented as mean ± SD; *p < 0.05

(5)

Conclusions

1. A short period of exercise training in CAD pa- tients improved physical capacity, but did not influence BMI, WHR or waist circumference.

2. Exercise training prevented an increase in lep- tin levels during the study period.

Acknowledgements

The authors do not report any conflict of inte- rest regarding this work.

The study was supported by the grant N° 2.11/

/I/07 from the Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Po- land.

References

1. Segal KR, Landt M, Klein S. Relationship between insulin sensi- tivity and plasma leptin concentration in lean and obese men.

Diabetes, 1996; 45: 988–991.

2. Wallace AM, McMahon AD, Packard CJ et al. Plasma leptin and the risk of cardiovascular disease in the west of Scotland coro- nary prevention study (WOSCOPS). Circulation, 2001; 104:

3052–3056.

3. Wolk R, Berger P, Lennon RJ, Brilakis ES, Johnson BD, Somers VK.

Plasma leptin and prognosis in patients with established coro- nary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44: 1819–1824.

4. Loffreda S, Yang SQ, Lin HZ et al. Leptin regulates proinflam- matory immune responses. FASEB J, 1998; 12: 57–65.

5. Santos-Alvarez J, Goberna R, Sanchez-Margalet V. Human lep- tin stimulates proliferation and activation of human circulating monocytes. Cell Immunol, 1999; 194: 6–11.

6. Maffei M, Halaas J, Ravussin E et al. Leptin levels in human and rodent: Measurement of plasma leptin and ob RNA in obese and weight-reduced subjects. Nat Med, 1995; 1: 1155–1161.

7. Murakami T, Shima K. Cloning of rat obese cDNA and its ex- pression in obese rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1995;

209: 944–952.

8. Considine RV, Sinha MK, Heiman ML et al. Serum immunore- active-leptin concentrations in normal-weight and obese hu- mans. N Engl J Med, 1996; 334: 292–295.

9. Funahashi T, Shimomura I, Hiraoka H et al. Enhanced expres- sion of rat obese (ob) gene in adipose tissues of ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH)-lesioned rats. Biochem Biophys Res Com- mun, 1995; 211: 469–475.

10. Knudson JD, Dincer UD, Zhang C et al. Leptin receptors are expressed in coronary arteries, and hyperleptinemia causes sig- nificant coronary endothelial dysfunction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2005; 289: H48–H56.

11. Nakata M, Yada T, Soejima N, Maruyama I. Leptin promotes aggregation of human platelets via the long form of its receptor.

Diabetes, 1999; 48: 426–429.

12. Maingrette F, Renier G. Leptin increases lipoprotein lipase se- cretion by macrophages: Involvement of oxidative stress and protein kinase C. Diabetes, 2003; 52: 2121–2128.

13. Li L, Mamputu JC, Wiernsperger N, Renier G. Signaling path- ways involved in human vascular smooth muscle cell prolifera- tion and matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression induced by leptin: Inhibitory effect of metformin. Diabetes, 2005; 54:

2227–2234.

14. Ishii T, Yamakita T, Yamagami K et al. Effect of exercise train- ing on serum leptin levels in type 2 diabetic patients. Metabo- lism, 2001; 50: 1136–1140.

15. Soderberg S, Stegmayr B, Stenlund H et al. Leptin, but not adiponectin, predicts stroke in males. J Intern Med, 2004; 256:

128–136.

16. Piatti P, Di Mario C, Monti LD et al. Association of insulin resistance, hyperleptinemia, and impaired nitric oxide release with in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing coronary stent- ing. Circulation, 2003; 108: 2074–2081.

17. Flegal KM, Shepherd JA, Looker AC et al. Comparisons of percentage body fat, body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-stature ratio in adults. Am J Clin Nutr, 2009; 89:

500–508.

18. Hickey MS, Israel RG, Gardiner SN et al. Gender differences in serum leptin levels in humans. Biochem Mol Med, 1996; 59: 1–6.

19. Rosenbaum M, Nicolson M, Hirsch J et al. Effects of gender, body composition, and menopause on plasma concentrations of leptin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1996; 81: 3424–3427.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

viduals with NSTE ‑ACS or stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) in whom both standard multi‑.. vessel CABG (due to median sternotomy

The values of myocardial work indices were decreasing with faster resting heart rate, increasing E/e’, and de‑.

CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that Ang‑2 levels were lower, while serum calprotectin and Ang‑1 levels were higher, in patients with stable CAD and poor CCC regardless of

Similarly, metabolic disor- ders such as reduced HDL -C, higher TG/HDL- -C ratio, and monocyte/HDL -C ratio were more pronounced in the CAE and CAD groups than in the control

Effect of exercise training on vascular endothelial function in patients with stable coronary artery disease:.. a randomized

In the present study we showed that: (1) Hybrid form of CR was effective in patients with DM; (2) The adherence to the program was high; (3) Patients with DM had higher rates of

Variable Increase in walk distance at 12M vs.. group B); Group A — standard phase II cardiac rehabilitation and new training model for 3 months after coronary artery bypass

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated Figure 1. Flow-chart of the study population; CAE — coronary artery ectasia; O-CAD — obstructive coronary artery disease.. were also identified