• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Implantable electrocardiographic monitoring devices

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Implantable electrocardiographic monitoring devices"

Copied!
2
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN CARDIOLOGY

Cardiology Journal 2009, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 86–87 Copyright © 2009 Via Medica ISSN 1897–5593

86 www.cardiologyjournal.org

Address for correspondence: Spencer Z. Rosero, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratory, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 679, Rochester, New York 14642, USA,

e-mail: Spencer_Rosero@urmc.rochester.edu

Implantable electrocardiographic monitoring devices

Spencer Z. Rosero

Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratory, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA

Recent advances in wireless communication, data storage, and implantable electronic technolo- gies have ushered in a new era of real-time, remo- te electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring using implantable devices. Existing continuous external ECG monitoring is limited by the patient’s ability to tolerate adhesive electrodes applied to the skin for days at a time, and the need to have the device worn on the waist or around the neck at all times.

These external ambulatory ECG monitoring devi- ces are first line when limited monitoring are ne- eded but are impractical for long term use. The in- corporation of cellular communication technology to provide real-time, continuous external ECG monitoring is highlighted by Cardionet’s monitoring services. In this model, ECG data is continuously transmitted to a central location via cell phone com- munication for analysis and reporting [1, 2].

Implantable ECG devices are indicated for pa- tients requiring long-term monitoring to diagnose the cause of recurrent syncope or to aid in the acti- ve management of arrhythmias such as atrial fibril- lation over prolonged periods of time (months to years). A key criterion for any implantable ECG monitor is that it be minimally invasive, reliable, wireless enabled, and programmable to meet the individual patient’s diagnostic needs.

While these devices are clearly distinct from therapeutic devices such as pacemakers and implan- table cardioverter-defibrillators, the technological advances of the latter group have facilitated the emergence of this technology.

In 1998 Medtronic received Food and Drug Administration approval for the “reveal” implanta- ble loop recorder (ILR), ushering in the first gene- ration of automatic implantable ECG recording

technology [3]. The ILR provided physicians with a powerful tool for managing a specific group of pa- tients: those with recurrent syncope of unknown etiology. The ILR platform allows for patient-acti- vated storage of ECGs and automatic recording trig- gered by heart rate criteria programmed by the health provider. Until recently, access to the sto- red ECG data required an office visit to download the information. Within the past year remote trans- telephonic transmission of data has been made po- ssible, facilitating the exchange of information between patients and health care providers.

In 2007 Transoma introduced their “sleuth”

implantable ECG monitoring system, which, in ad- dition to standard automatic and patient-activated recording of ECG data, has the capability to automa- tically transmit the data to handheld “personal dia- gnostic manager” (PDM) [4]. The PDM then esta- blishes a communication link with, and downloads data to, a base station in the patient’s home. The base station then communicates with a monitoring cen- tre that operates 24-hours a day, seven days a week to provide interpretation of the arrhythmia. The elec- trocardiographic data is reviewed by certified tech- nicians and transmitted to the physician’s office via fax, e-mail, or telephone. In addition, the active scre- ening of all ECG data by the technicians reduces the physician’s office time and the resources required to sort out artefacts and clinically irrelevant trans- missions. In this situation, near real-time transmis- sion of data to a central station is limited to those times that the patient is at home. Any arrhythmias occurring outside the home will not be available for analysis or notification until the patient returns home and a communication link is made between the pa- tient’s implanted device and the base station.

(2)

87 Spencer Z. Rosero, Implantable electrocardiographic monitoring devices

www.cardiologyjournal.org

Current clinical guidelines focus on using the- se devices in patients with unexplained syncope, near syncope, dizziness, or palpitations. However, implantable ECG monitors provide clinicians with a new set of tools that are not limited to diagnostics but allow long term arrhythmia management. The incorporation of a small handheld interface for pa- tients provides an opportunity to develop patient- specific applications in the future that empower the patients to play an active role in their own health care. The potential utility of these technologies in clinical practice includes the monitoring of arrhy- thmias such as atrial fibrillation and its response to pharmacologic, radiofrequency or cryoablation tech- niques, or device-based therapeutics. In the futu- re, implantable ECG monitoring devices will pro- bably play a key role in clinical arrhythmia trials studying the efficacy of various therapeutic appro- aches such as pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation. The objective continuous control and

post-intervention monitoring of arrhythmias provi- ded by this technology may facilitate and provide a much more accurate picture of treatment outcomes in the long term.

References

1. Rothman SA, Laughlin JC, Seltzer J et al. The Diagnosis or Cardiac Arrhythmias: A Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Study Comparing Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry Versus Standard Loop Event Monitoring. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2007; 18: 1–7.

2. Prystowsky EN. Assessment of rhythm and rate control in pa- tients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2006; 17 (suppl. 2): S7–S10.

3. Brignole M, Sutton R, Menozzi C et al. Early application of an implantable loop recorder allows effective specific therapy in patients with recurrent suspected neurally mediated syncope.

Eur Heart J, 2006; 27: 1085–1092.

4. Transoma Model 2010 SLEUTH Implantable ECG monitor- -Instruction Manual 2007 (http://transoma.com/app/webroot/files/

/resources/Sleuth_Instructions_for_Use.pdf).

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Surprisingly, recent data from a survey of 45 centers showed a relatively low use of ILRs in patients with recurrent synco- pe with no underlying structural heart disease,

Recording and wirelessly transmitting PEM — single lead NUVANT Mobile Cardiac Telemetry (MCT) System by Corventis, San Jose, California, revolves around the chest worn

Progressive diagnostic evaluation of the sud- den cardiac arrest survivor; *non-invasive assessment of coronary artery abnormalities by cardiac computed tomography or magnetic

Many studies have shown the ability of remo- te monitoring to reduce follow-up in patients with ICD, to detect serious ICD defects and to check on a patient’s daily clinical

Key words: ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, geomagnetic activity, cosmic ray (neutron)

Continuous glucose monitoring allows more ef- fective adjustment of insulin doses to blood glucose trends, resulting in better metabolic control: more time spent in the glucose

el of remote monitoring data sharing, for a global management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a document of the italian Association of Arrhythmology

In patients at high risk and / or with an implantable cardioverter ‑defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT ‑D), all sessions were supervised by