LXXXI.3 (1997)
Tate–Shafarevich groups of the congruent number elliptic curves
by
Ken Ono (Princeton, N.J., and University Park, Penn.)
The relations. If N ≥ 1 is an odd square-free integer, then let E
1(N ) and E
2(N ) denote the elliptic curves over Q
E
i(N ) : y
2= x
3− 4
i−1N
2x,
and let r
i(N ) denote the rank of E
i(N ). Similarly let X
i(N ) denote the Tate–Shafarevich group X(E
i(N )). If
q := e
2πiz, η(z) := q
1/24Y
∞ n=1(1 − q
n), Θ(z) := X
n∈Z
q
n2,
then let f
1(z) ∈ S
3/2(128, χ
0) and f
2(z) ∈ S
3/2(128, χ
2) be eigenforms given by
f
1(z) := η(8z)η(16z)Θ(2z) = X
∞ n=1a
1(n)q
n,
f
2(z) := η(8z)η(16z)Θ(4z) = X
∞ n=1a
2(n)q
n. Throughout χ
t:=
t·shall denote Kronecker’s character for Q( √
t). Both forms lift, via the Shimura correspondence, to the cusp form associated with the curve y
2= x
3− x:
X
∞ n=1a(n)q
n:= η
2(4z)η
2(8z) = q Y
∞ n=1(1 − q
4n)
2(1 − q
8n)
2.
Consequently, we obtain the following multiplicative formulae for square-free t ≥ 1:
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 11G40.
The author is supported by NSF grants DMS-9508976 and DMS-9304580.
[247]
(1)
a
1(tm
2) = a
1(t) X
d|m
χ
−1(d)µ(d)
t d
a(m/d),
a
2(tm
2) = a
2(t) X
d|m
χ
−2(d)µ(d)
t d
a(m/d).
Given a
i(t), the integers a
i(tm
2) follow immediately from (1) since
(2) a(N ) = X
x∈Z, y≥0 4x2+(2y+1)2=N
(−1)
x+y(2y + 1).
This can be deduced by explicitly computing the Hecke Gr¨ossencharacter of y
2= x
3− x, or by computing the relevant Jacobstahl sums [B-E-W, Ch. 6], or by classical q-series identities [M-O, Th. 3].
Tunnell [T] proved that if N ≥ 1 is an odd square-free integer, then (3) L(E
i(N ), 1) = 2
i−1· Ω · a
i(N )
24 √
2
i−1N , where
Ω :=
∞
\
1
√ 1
x
3− x dx ∼ 2.622 . . .
Therefore assuming the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, E
i(N ) has rank 0 if and only if a
i(N ) 6= 0. In addition if a
i(N ) 6= 0, then
(4) p
|X
i(N )| = |a
i(N )|
τ (N )
where τ (N ) denotes the number of divisors of N. If the functions T
i(t, m) are defined by
(5) T
1(t, m) :=
sign(a
1(t))τ (t) P
d|m
χ
−1(d)µ(d)(t/d)a(m/d) if a
1(t) 6= 0,
0 if a
1(t) = 0,
(6) T
2(t, m) :=
sign(a
2(t))τ (t) P
d|m
χ
−2(d)µ(d)(t/d)a(m/d) if a
2(t) 6= 0,
0 if a
2(t) = 0,
then by (1), (4), (5), and (6), if t ≥ 1 is an odd square-free integer, then (7) a
i(tm
2) = T
i(t, m) p
|X
i(t)|.
For convenience we define the sets S
1(N ) and F(N ), the indices for the first
explicit Kronecker relation:
S
1(N ) :=
(m, k) ∈ Z
2+k ≥ 3 odd, 2N − k
2m
2∈ Z
+square-free, r
12N − k
2m
2= 0
,
F(N ) := {(x, y) | x ∈ Z, y ≥ 0, and 4x
2+ (2y + 1)
2= N }.
Theorem 1. If N is a positive integer , then a
1(N − 1) +
X
∞ k=1a
1(N − (2k + 1)
2)
= X
x∈Z, y≥0 8x2+2(2y+1)2=N
(−1)
y(2y + 1) + 2 X
x∈Z, y≥0 16x2+4(2y+1)2=N
(−1)
x+y(2y + 1).
P r o o f. If F
1(z) :=
X
∞ n=1A
1(n)q
n:= η(4z)η(8z)Θ(z) X
∞ k=0q
(2k+1)2/2,
then it turns out that
F
1(z) = C
1(z) + 2η
2(8z)η
2(16z) where C
1(z) = P
∞n=1
b(n)q
nis the newform associated with the elliptic curve y
2= x
3+ x.
In particular, all three forms are in S
2(64) and the identity follows from the standard dimension counting argument. In this case checking the identity for the first 9 terms suffices. Therefore we find that A
1(N ) = b(N )+2a(N/2).
Using [B-E-W, Ch. 6], or [M-O, Th. 3], it turns out that b(N ) = X
(x,y)∈F(N )
(−1)
y(2y + 1).
Assuming the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, E
1(t) for t ≥ 1 odd and square-free has rank 0 if and only if a
1(t) 6= 0. The proof now follows immediately from (2) and (7).
Using the previous discussion we obtain the following immediate corol- lary.
Corollary 1. Assuming the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, if
2N − 1 is a positive square-free integer for which E
1(2N − 1) has rank 0,
then
T
1(2N − 1, 1) p
|X
1(2N − 1)|
+ X
(m,k)∈S1(N )
T
12N − k
2m
2, m
s X
12N − k
2m
2= X
(x,y)∈F(N )
(−1)
y(2y + 1) + 2 X
(x,y)∈F(N/2)
(−1)
x+y(2y + 1).
Corollary 2. Assuming the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, if 2N − 1 is a positive square-free integer for which E
1(2N − 1) has rank 0 and ord
p(N ) is odd for some prime p ≡ 3 (mod 4), then
|X
1(2N − 1)|
= 1
τ (2N − 1)
2X
(m,k)∈S1(N )
T
12N − k
2m
2, m
s X
12N − k
2m
22
. We now define the index sets S
2(N ), H(N ), and I(N ) for the second Kronecker relation:
S
2(N ) :=
(m, k) ∈ Z
2+N − 4k
2m
2∈ Z
+square-free, r
2N − k
2m
2= 0
, H(N ) := {(x, y) | x ∈ Z, y ≥ 0, and 16x
2+ (2y + 1)
2= N },
I(N ) := {(x, y) | x, y ≥ 0, and 4(2x + 1)
2+ (2y + 1)
2= N }.
Theorem 2. If N is a positive integer , then a
2(N ) + 2
X
∞ k=1a
2(N − 4k
2)
= X
x∈Z, y≥0 16x2+(2y+1)2=N
(−1)
x+yχ
2(2y + 1)(2y + 1)
− 4 X
x,y≥0 4(2x+1)2+(2y+1)2=N
(−1)
x+1χ
2(2y + 1)(2x + 1).
P r o o f. If
F
2(z) :=
X
∞ n=1A
2(n)q
n:= f
2(z)Θ(4z), then it is easy to deduce that
F
∗(z) := X
n≡1,3,7,11,13,15 (mod 16)
A
2(n)q
n− X
n≡5,9 (mod 16)
A
2(n)q
nis the newform associated with the elliptic curve y
2= x
3− 2x. The proof
now follows from the explicit Jacobstahl sums P
p−1x=0
((x
3−2x)/p) which can be found in [B-E-W, 6.1.2, 6.2.1].
As immediate corollaries we obtain:
Corollary 3. Assuming the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, if N ≥ 1 is an odd square-free integer for which E
2(N ) has rank 0, then T
2(N, 1) p
|X
2(N )| + 2 X
(m,k)∈S2(N )
T
2N − 4k
2m
2, m
s X
2N − 4k
2m
2= X
(x,y)∈H(N )
(−1)
x+yχ
2(2y+1)(2y+1)−4 X
(x,y)∈I(N )
(−1)
x+1χ
2(2y+1)(2x+1).
Corollary 4. Assuming the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, if N is a positive odd square-free integer for which E
2(N ) has rank 0 and ord
p(N ) = 1 for some prime p ≡ 3 (mod 4), then
|X
2(N )| = 4 τ (N )
2X
(m,k)∈S2(N )