• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Some remarks on Carath´ eodory conditions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Some remarks on Carath´ eodory conditions"

Copied!
5
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Seria I: PRACE MATEMATYCZNE XLV (1) (2005), 125-129

I.V. Shragin

Some remarks on Carath´ eodory conditions

Abstract. Let (T , T) be a measurable space, X and Y be metric spaces. For the maps from T × X into Y the notions of supmeasurability, standardness and Carath´eodory conditions are considered, and the logical relations between these notions are dis- cussed.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 28A20.

Key words and phrases: supmeasurable function, standard function, Carath´eodory function.

Let (T , T) be a measurable space, X and Y be metric spaces, B(X ) and B(Y) be the σ-algebras of their Borel sets. Denote by Λ the product T × B(X ), i.e. the σ-algebra on T × X generated by the family {A × B : A ∈ T, B ∈ B(X )}. With each function ϕ : T → X we associate its ”graph-function” Gϕ: T → T × X , where Gϕ(t) = (t, ϕ(t)) (so that Gϕ(T ) = grϕ).

Lemma 1 A function ϕ : T → X is (T, B(X ))-measurable (i.e. ∀B ∈ B(X ) ϕ−1(B) ∈ T) if and only if Gϕis (T, Λ)-measurable.

Proof If ϕ is (T, B(X ))-measurable, by A ∈ T, B ∈ B(X ) G−1ϕ (A × B) = {t : (t, ϕ(t)) ∈ A × B} = A ∩ ϕ−1(B) ∈ T, i.e. Gϕ is (T, Λ)-measurable. The converse statement follows from the equality ϕ−1(B) = G−1ϕ (T × B). 

Definition 1 A function f : T × X → Y is called supmeasurable if for any (T, B(X ))-measurable function ϕ the composition f ◦ Gϕ : T → Y is (T, B(Y))- measurable.

Remind the notion of standard function ([1], [2]). It is defined with the help of σ-ideal

(1) J := {A ⊂ T : (E ⊂ A) ⇒ (E ∈ T)}

(2)

(evidently, J ⊂ T). Denote by R the σ-filter dual to J , i.e.

R:= {T0⊂ T : T \ T0∈ J }.

It is clear that R ⊂ T and T ∈ R.

Definition 2 A function f : T × X → Y is called standard if there is T0∈ R such that the restriction of f onto T0× X is (Λ, B(Y))-measurable.

For convenience of reading we prove the following

Proposition 1 ([1],[2]) If a function f is standard, then it is supmeasurable.

Proof Let ϕ : T → X be a (T, B(X ))-measurable function and take arbitrary C ∈ B(Y). Then (f ◦ Gϕ)−1(C) = G−1ϕ [f−1(C)]. Let T0be a set from Definition 2 and put

P = f−1(C) ∩ (T0× X ), Q = f−1(C) \ (T0× X ).

As (by Definition 2) P ∈ Λ, by virtue of Lemma 1 G−1ϕ (P ) ∈ T. Further, as Q ⊂ (T \T0)×X , G−1ϕ (Q) ⊂ T \T0∈ J , whence G−1ϕ (Q) ∈ T. Thus (f ◦Gϕ)−1(C) = G−1ϕ (P ∪ Q) ∈ T, i.e. the function f is supmeasurable. 

Definition 3 A function f : T × X → Y is called Carath´eodory function (shortly:

C-function) if the following conditions (Carath´eodory conditions) are fulfilled:

1) (∀ x ∈ X ) the function f (·, x) : T → Y is (T, B(Y))-measurable;

2) (∃ T0∈ R) (∀ t ∈ T0) the function f (t, ·) : X → Y is continuous.

In this paper we investigate the relations between the notions of standard function and Carath´eodory function.

Proposition 2 ([1],[2]) Let the space X (with metric d) be separable. Then every C-function f is standard (and ,by virtue of Proposition 1, is supmeasurable).

Proof Let a countable set V be dense in X . Take an arbitrary closed set F ⊂ Y and put

Un= {y ∈ Y : ρ(y, F ) < 1/n}, n = 1, 2, . . . (ρ is a metric in Y). If f0= f |(T

0×X), where T0 is the set from Definition 3, then ([2], Theorem 3)

f0−1(F ) =

\

n=1

[

v∈V

{t ∈ T0: f (t, v) ∈ Un} × {x : d(x, v) < 1/n}.

Hence f0−1(F ) ∈ Λ, i.e. the function f is standard.  In connection with Proposition 2 the question arises about essentiality of sepa- rability of X . As we shall see, this condition is not necessary for standardness of some C-functions. We begin at following simple example.

(3)

Example 1 Let f (t, x) = gk(x), t ∈ Tk∈ T, k = 1, 2, . . . , x ∈ X , where the sets Tk form a countable (in particular, finite) partition of T , and the functions gk: X → Y are continuous. Then it is easy to check that f is standard C-function by any metric space X .

Note that in Example 1 the standardness of f remains by Borel functions gk. By consideration of another class of standard C-functions we shall use the fol- lowing

Lemma 2 Let T and X be metric spaces, where T is separable. Then B(T × X ) ⊂ B(T ) × B(X ).

Proof Let {Ak} be a countable basis of open sets in T . Then ([3], Proposition 2.2) any open set G in the space T × X has the form G =S

k(Ak× Uk), where Uk are some open sets in X . Hence G ∈ B(T ) × B(X ), from where the statement of the

lemma follows directly. 

Proposition 3 Let T , X , Y be metric spaces, where T is separable. Then every C-function f : T × X → Y is standard (here the role of σ-algebra T is played by B(T )).

Proof Let f be C-function. As R ⊂ T = B(T ), the set T0(see Definition 3) is a Borel set in T . Consider the restriction f0of f onto T0×X . By Definition 3 (∀ x ∈ X ) f0(·, x) : T0→ Y is Borel function and (∀ t ∈ T0) the function f0(t, ·) : X → Y is continuous. Then by theorem of Kuratowski ([4], §31, V, Theorem 2) f0is a Borel function,, i.e. (∀C ∈ B(Y)) f0−1(C) ∈ B(T0× X ). As the space T0is separable, by Lemma 2

B(T0× X ) ⊂ B(T0) × B(X ) ⊂ B(T ) × B(X ) = Λ.

Hence f0is (Λ, B(Y))-measurable, i.e. f is standard.  So Example 1 and Proposition 3 show that C-function can be standard by non- separable space X . However there exist nonstandard C-functions. For consideration of such example we need the following

Lemma 3 (cf. [5], Exercise 5.1.8) Let (T , T) and (X , B) be measurable spaces.

If a function ψ : T → X has grψ ∈ T × B, then cardψ(T ) ≤ c.

Proof Use the following statement ([5], Exercise 5.1.7): if D ∈ T × B, then the collection {Dt : t ∈ T } of sections Dt := {x ∈ X : (t, x) ∈ D} has at most the cardinality of the continuum. Hence card{(grψ)t : t ∈ T } ≤ c. But since

(grψ)t= ψ(t), then {(grψ)t: t ∈ T } = ψ(T ). 

Example 2 Let T = {χE : E ⊂ R} with χE(s) = 1 by s ∈ E, and χE(s) = 0 by s ∈ R \ E. Let σ-algebra T on T consists of the all countable (in particular, finite) subsets of T and their complements. Then countable sets form the σ-ideal J defined in (1).

(4)

Indeed, if A ⊂ T and A is countable, then evidently A ∈ J . Let A be a uncount- able set. It is known ([6], Chapter 2, Theorem 13) that there exists E ⊂ A such that card(E)=card(A \ E)=card(A). Hence E 6∈ T and A 6∈ J .

Let X = T . We introduce in X the discrete metric d( d(x1, x2) = 0 by x1 = x2, d(x1, x2) = 1 by x16= x2). Evidently, the space X is nonseparable and all sets in X are open. Hence B(X ) = P(X), where P(X) is the collection of all subsets of X .

Let Y = R with natural metric and f (t, x) = d(t, x). Evidently, the function f : T × X → R is C-function (T plays the role of T0from Definition 3).

For the proof of nonstandardness of f we use Lemma 3. Put ψ(t) = t, t ∈ T . Then card(ψ(T )) =card(T ) = 2c. Hence grψ 6∈ T × B(X ). Note that grψ = ∆, where ∆ is the diagonal in T × T .

Take an arbitrary set T0∈ R (i.e. T \T0is countable) and consider the restriction f0of f onto T0× X . We have

f0−1{0} = {(t, x) ∈ T0× X : x = t} = ∆ ∩ (T0× T0).

Further

(2) ∆ \ (T0× T0) = [

t∈T\T0

({t} × {t}) ∈ T × B(X ) = Λ.

Since ∆ 6∈ Λ, then from (2) it follows that ∆ ∩ (T0× T0) 6∈ Λ. So f0−1{0} 6∈ Λ, i.e. f is nonstandard.

It turns out that the C-function f from Example 2 is supmeasurable, although f is nonstandard. This fact follows from the next account.

First of all we note that if (in general situation described at beginning of the paper) a function f : T × X → Y satisfies the condition 1) from Definition 3 and a function ϕ : T → X is (T, B(X ))-measurable and countably valued (i.e. ϕ(T) is countable), then (as it is easy to check) f ◦ Gϕ is (T, B(Y))-measurable.

Furthermore the following lemma is valid.

Lemma 4 Let T be a uncountable set and σ-algebra T on T consists of all countable sets and their complements. Let further X be a nonempty set. Then if a function ϕ : T → X is (T, P(X ))-measurable, it is countably valued.

Proof Consider the map β : X → T with β(x) = ϕ−1{x}. Obviously, if x16= x2, then β(x1) ∩ β(x2) = ∅.

Assume that (∀ x ∈ X ) β(x) is countable. Since T =S β(x) with x ∈ ϕ(T ) and T is uncountable, then ϕ(T ) is uncountable too. Consider a splitting ϕ(T ) = β1∪β2 with

card(βi) = card(ϕ(T )), i = 1, 2.

Evidently card(ϕ−1i)) ≥card(βi), i = 1, 2. So both sets ϕ−1i) are uncountable and disjoint with

ϕ−11) ∪ ϕ−12) = T .

Hence ϕ−1i) 6∈ T, i = 1, 2, i.e. ϕ is not (T, P(X ))-measurable and that contradicts to hypothesis of the lemma.

(5)

Thus by some x0(evidently unique) the set β(x0) is uncountable. As β(x0) ∈ T, T \ β(x0) is countable. Two cases are possible. If β(x0) = T , then ϕ(T ) = {x0}.

And if β(x0) 6= T , then

T \ β(x0) =[

β(x), x ∈ ϕ(T ) \ {x0},

where all β(x) are mutually disjoint. Hence ϕ(T ) is countable in both cases.  We return to Example 2 and show that considered C-function f is supmeasurable.

In fact, let ϕ : T → X be a (T, P(X ))-measurable functin. Then, by Lemma 4, ϕ is countably valued. From here, as we noted above, it follows that f ◦ Gϕis (T, B(R))- measurable.

The question remains open about existence of C-function (by nonseparable space X ) that is not supmeasurable.

References

[1] I. V. Shragin, Conditions for measurability of superpositions, Soviet Acad. Sci. Dokl. 197(2) (1971), 295-298 (in Russian) [English translation: Soviet Mathematics, Doklady, 12(2) (1971), 465-470].

[2] I. V. Shragin, Superpositional measurability, Izvestija Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenij, Matem- atika 1 (1975), 82-92 (in Russian).

[3] S. J. Leese, Measurable selections and the uniformization of Souslin sets, Amer. J. Math.

100(1) (1978), 19-41.

[4] K. Kuratowski, Topology, v.1, Academic Press, New York and London 1966.

[5] D. L. Cohn, Measure theory, Birkh¨auser, Boston 1993.

[6] I. Kaplansky, Set theory and metric spaces, Chelsea Publ. Comp., New York 1977.

I.V. Shragin

Florenzen Str. 2-6, 20/2, 50765 K¨oln, Germany E-mail: marina spektor@mail.ru

(Received: 8.12.2004; revised: 28.02.2005)

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

For a local parametrization of the periodic trajectories, we define the corresponding energy-period function T : (0, γ) → R, which assigns to each periodic trajectory its

Specifically, in Section 3 we show how, in the case of an abstract nonlinear parabolic equation, the Faedo–Galerkin method works, and in Section 4 how to realize the old Fourier idea

Keywords: existence theorem, functional differential equation, hyperbolic equation, Darboux problem, solution in the sense of Carath´eodory.. 2000 Mathematics Subject

The well known class of Carath´ eodory functions having positive real part in D, denoted by P , coin- cides with P (0)... Repeating

4) The multifunction (9) is upper Carath´ eodory, but not upper Scorza-Dragoni. From Theorem 5 it follows that it is not product-measurable, and thus from Theorem 1 it follows that

Necessary and sufficient conditions for minimum energy control of positive discrete-time linear systems with bounded inputs, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences:

Recall that the Carath´ eodory balls in E (p) with center at 0 are sets of the type E p (0, r, 1), so the natural generalization of the theorems known so far (see [Sc], [Sr],

Some sufficient conditions for controllability of nonlinear systems described by differential equation ˙x = f (t, x(t), u(t)) are given.. Keywords: differential equation,