• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Comments on “Dorsal scapular nerve entrapment neuropathy managed by ultrasound-guided hydrodissection – a case report”

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Comments on “Dorsal scapular nerve entrapment neuropathy managed by ultrasound-guided hydrodissection – a case report”"

Copied!
3
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

e267

Comments on “Dorsal scapular nerve entrapment neuropathy managed by ultrasound-guided hydrodissection – a case report”

Commentary

Cite as: Lam KHS, Hung Ch-Y, Su D: Comments on “Dorsal scapular nerve entrapment neuropathy managed by ultrasound-guided hydrodissection – a case report”.

J Ultrason 2021; 21: e267–e269. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2021.0044.

© Polish Ultrasound Society. Published by Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND). Reproduction is permitted for personal, educational, non-commercial use, provided that the original article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited.

Comments on “Dorsal scapular nerve entrapment neuropathy managed by ultrasound-guided

hydrodissection – a case report”

King Hei Stanley Lam

1,2,3

, Chen-Yu Hung

4

, Daniel Su

5

1 Clinical Research, The Hong Kong Institute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Hong Kong

2 Family Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

3 Family Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

4 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Beihu Branch, Taiwan

5 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,, Chi-Mei Medical Center,, Taiwan Correspondence: King Hei Stanley Lam, Clinical Research, The Hong Kong Institute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Hong Kong; email: drlamkh@gmail.com

DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2021.0044 Submitted:

11.05.2021 Accepted:

08.06.2021 Published:

16.08.2021

the fifth rib. We also provide a video showing the scanning of these structures in Video 1.

Although we are delighted to see the use of the hydrodissection technique in this case report, we are worried about the fact that the intercostal muscles have been included as the sono- landmarks in the image before hydrodissection. The pleura and lung are located just below the innermost intercostal mem- brane, such that if the needle tip is not well visualized during hydrodissection, the needle may end up entering the lungs and causing pneumothorax. Instead, we highly suggest the use of the rib and insertion of the SPS as the landmarks; moreover, We have read with great interest the manuscript titled “Dorsal

scapular nerve entrapment neuropathy managed by ultra- sound-guided hydrodissection – a case report” by Gaurav Kant Sharma and Rajesh Botchu(1). We appreciate the fact that the authors have pointed out dorsal scapular nerve (DSN) entrap- ment as one of the common causes of interscapular upper thoracic pain, and the usage of high-resolution ultrasound to visualize DSN entrapment in the interscapular regions. The manuscript is well-written; however, we are somewhat con- cerned about the figures included in the manuscript.

In Fig. 1B of Sharma’s manuscript, the linear muscle ante- rior to the rhomboids, posterior to the other paraspinal muscles, and with the muscle fibers directly slanting across the image, should be the serratus posterior superior (SPS) muscle. (Fig. 1) The DSN runs down the medial border of the scapula, deep to the levator scapulae and rhomboids, and superficial to the serratus anterior muscle and the SPS(2–4). However, the label of the DSN has been placed anterior to the SPS. Anatomically, this hypoechoic echostructure, consider- ing it to be a swollen nerve, should be the posterior ramus of the thoracic spinal nerve, which is commonly entrapped by the insertion of the SPS over the second to fifth ribs. If this was swollen posterior ramus of the thoracic spinal nerve, the diagnosis in the case report should have been notalgia par- esthetica (NP), which is attributed to the entrapment of the T2–T6 posterior rami that supply cutaneous innervation to the area(5). Additionally, the patient was treated with ultrasound- guided hydrodissection of the lateral branch of the posterior ramus of the thoracic spinal nerve. Herein, we provide a pic- ture (Fig. 2) showing the sonoanatomy of the DSN in relation to the SPS, levator scapulae (LS), rhomboid minor (RMi), rhomboid major (RMa), and the levels from the second rib to

Keywords sonoanatomy, ultrasound-guided hydrodissection, serratus posterior superior, ultrasound, dorsal scapular nerve

Fig. 1. Proposed correct sonoanatomical locations of the dorsoscap- ular nerve (DSN) medial to the dorsoscapular artery (DSA) and posterolateral to the serratus posterior superior (SPS)

(2)

e268

J Ultrason 2021; 21: e267–e269 King Hei Stanley Lam, Chen-Yu Hung, Daniel Su

Conflict of interest

Authors do not report any financial or personal connections with other persons or organizations, which might negatively affect the contents of this publication and/or claim authorship rights to this publication.

the final position of the needle and the final target of hydrodis- section should be posterior/superficial to the SPS insertion and medial to the dorsoscapular artery, with the rib and needle tip always in view to prevent entry into the lungs (Video 2).

Moreover, biomechanically, the fascial plane between the rhomboids and the SPS is not a common entrapment site encountered in the clinical practice. In fact, the scalenus medius muscle through which the DSN passes, is the most common site of entrapment(1).

Fig. 2. Sonoanatomy of the dorsoscapular nerve (DSN) and its relationship with the dorsoscapular artery (DSA) and other muscles from the second rib (A), third rib (B), fourth rib (C) to the fifth rib (D). UT – upper trapezius; SPS – serratus posterior superior; LS – levator scapulae; L – longissimus; IC – iliocostalis; SA – serratus anterior; RMa – rhomboid major; RMi – rhomboid minor; MT – middle trapezius

A

B

C

D

(3)

J Ultrason 2021; 21: e267–e269

e269

Comments on “Dorsal scapular nerve entrapment neuropathy managed by ultrasound-guided hydrodissection – a case report”

References

1. Sharma GK, Botchu R: Dorsal scapular nerve entrapment neuropathy managed by ultrasound-guided hydrodissection – a case report. J Ul- trason 2021; 21: 74–76.

2. Muir B: Dorsal scapular nerve neuropathy: a narrative review of the literature. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2017; 61: 128–144.

3. Moore KL: Clinically oriented anatomy. 2nd Edition. Williams &

Wilkins, Baltimore 1985: 994.

4. Tubbs RS, Tyler-Kabara EC, Aikens AC, Martin JP, Weed LL, Salter EG et al.: Surgical anatomy of the dorsal scapular nerve. J Neurosurg 2005;

102: 910–911.

5. Tacconi P, Manca D, Tamburini G, Cannas A, Giagheddu M: Notalgia paresthetica following neuralgic amyotrophy: a case report. Neurol Sci 2004; 25: 27–29.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

The features favouring small-bowel over ileocolic intussusception include a smaller anteropos- terior diameter of the lesion, smaller diameter and linear appearance of the inner

Dorsal scapular nerve entrapment neuropathy is a rare case of upper thoracic and medial scapular pain that can be managed successfully with ultrasound-guided hydrodis- section,

The combination of ultraso- nography and a nerve conduction study can facilitate conservative treatment of needle aspira- tion for posterior interosseous nerve palsy caused by

Przed właściwym zabiegiem tracheotomii wyko- nuje się wstępne badanie ultrasonograficzne, które- go celem jest identyfikacja struktur anatomicznych, wyznaczenie osi tchawicy,

Zobrazowano twarzoczaszkę i szyję, klatkę piersiową, jamę brzuszną i miednicę stwierdzając w tkance podskórnej (tłuszczowej) prawej części podbrzusza 2 sąsiadujące

The diagnosis of cutaneous sarcoidosis relies mainly on the patient’s history, presence of characteristic skin lesions and histological examination that shows a

Nevertheless, in spite of the immunosuppres- sive treatment, the ANA profile conducted 1 year after treatment confirmed the presence of SLE specific an- ti-dsDNA antibodies,

A shift in the prevailing block technique from single injection to multiple injections was observed, regardless of the nerve location technique employed (from 29% up to 84% of