• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

A simple case of bifascicular block, or is there more than meets the eye?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "A simple case of bifascicular block, or is there more than meets the eye?"

Copied!
3
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

311 www.cardiologyjournal.org

CASE REPORT

Cardiology Journal 2007, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 311–313 Copyright © 2007 Via Medica ISSN 1897–5593

Address for correspondence: Ethan Levine, DO University of Rochester Medical Center Division of Cardiology

601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 679 C Rochester, New York 14642, USA e-mail: ethan_levine@urmc.rochester.edu Received: 18.11.2006 Accepted: 3.04.2007

A simple case of bifascicular block, or is there more than meets the eye?

Ethan Levine, Burr Hall and Daniel Kroening

University of Rochester Medical Center, Division of Cardiology, Rochester, New York, USA

There are many neuromuscular diseases which have cardiac manifestations. These are largely in- filtrative myopathies, at times having a predilection for the conducting tissues, at others, largely involv- ing the moycytes. The authors describe a 52-year old man with myotonic dystrophy type I and syncopal episodes.

The patient presented to an outpatient neuro- logy clinic for a regularly scheduled appointment after a few years of being lost to follow up. He re- lated having experienced two syncopal episodes in

the preceding month. On one occasion he rose from the bed to use the bathroom but apparently passed out before reaching the bathroom, he was found by family members who heard the fall; there were no stigmata of seizure activity and the patient rapidly recovered. The other episode also took place short- ly after rising to cross a room. Upon hearing this, the neurologist ordered an ECG (Fig. 1) which re- vealed a sinus rhythm with right bundle branch and left anterior fascicular block as well as borderline first degree AV block.

Figure 1. Twelve lead electrocardiogram demonstrating a sinus rhythm with right bundle branch block and a marked left axis deviation consistent with left anterior fascicular block.

(2)

312

Cardiology Journal 2007, Vol. 14, No. 3

www.cardiologyjournal.org

Given the high prevalence of His-Purkinje disease in patients with myotonic dystrophy the patient was urgently referred to the electrophys- iology clinic where a repeat ECG was essentially unchanged. The patient had experienced no fur- ther episodes; however a strong suspicion of in- franodal disease prompted the scheduling of an EP study.

On the day of EP study the patient presented to the EP lab in 2:1 AV block (Fig. 2), again without fur- ther episodes or symptoms. Intracardiac recordings con- firmed the presence of infranodal disease as evidenced by infrahisian block (Fig. 3). Furthermore, with atrial pacing, infranodal Wenckebach was noted (Fig. 4). These findings, along with easily inducible ventricular tachy- cardia prompted the implantation if a defibrillator.

Figure 2. Standard 12 lead ECG displayed at 25 mm/s. Note 2:1 AV block with one P wave located at the terminal portion of the T wave.

Figure 3. Three surface leads and intracardiac electrograms recorded during sinus rhythm at 100 mm/s. Note that the second atrial electrogram is followed by a His signal which fails to excite the ventricle, proof of block below the His;

A — atrial electrogram, His — His electrogram, V — ventricular electrogram.

(3)

313 Ethan Levine et al., A simple case of bifascicular block

www.cardiologyjournal.org

Figure 4. Again, three surface leads and the intracardiac tracings from the His catheter, this time at a speed of 150 mm/s. Note the “Stim” channel at the bottom, indicating atrial pacing (not shown). Note the relatively stable A-H interval indicating normal AV node function at this pacing rate, however the H-V interval progressively prolongs and then “drops” a beat in a Wenkebach pattern; A, H and V are as in Figure 3.

Myotonic dystrophy (type 1) is the most common neuromuscular disease with a prevalence estimated at 1/8000 live births. It is an inherited disorder, passed on in an autosomal dominant fashion with variable penetrance. On a molecular level there is a mutation in the myotonic dystrophy protein kinase gene on chromosome 19 resulting in a variable number of CTG nucleotide repeats. The major clinical features of the disease include myotonia, frontal balding, endocrin- opathies, proximal limb and facial muscle weakness, developmental delay and premature cataracts [1].

The cardiac manifestations are preferential infiltra- tion and fibrosis of the conducting system, ventricu- lar tachycardia (particularly bundle branch reentry), syncope and sudden death [2]. Infiltrative cardio- myopathy due to myotonic dystrophy is rare.

The recommendations for the cardiac care of patients with myotonic dystrophy are understand- ably not as well defined as for those of many other conditions. Current recommendations for patients with myotonic dystrophy call for routine electrocar- diographic screening [3]. EP study had been recom- mended for patients with palpitations, syncope, pre- syncope or evidence of AV block on the surface ECG.

The standard of practice in many labs is to implant a pacemaker for patients with an H-V interval of greater than 70 milliseconds [4]. Unfor- tunately, pacemakers do not eliminate the risk of sudden death as they do not afford protection from

ventricular tachycardia which is also well described in this cohort. The guidelines for dealing with ven- tricular tachycardia in these patients are less well defined. Radiofrequency ablation of bundle branch reentry (when it is the clinical tachycardia) may be effective in eliminating symptoms, however; in this patient with non bundle branch reentrant ventricu- lar tachycardia ICD implantation is reasonable [4].

Although these patients do not classically manifest a significant cardiomyopathy, it has been described.

In these patients, most experts advise standard therapy for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

References

1. Meola G. Myotonic dystrophies. Curr Opin Neurol, 2000; 13: 519–525.

2. Merino JL, Carmona JR, Fernandez-Lozano I, Peinado R, Basterra N, Sobrino JA. Mechanisms of sustained ventricular tachycardia in myotonic dystrophy. Cir- culation, 1998; 98: 541–546.

3. Hawley RJ, Milner MR, Gottdiener JS, Cohen A.

Myotonic heart disease: A clinical follow-up. Neuro- logy, 1991; 41: 259–262.

4. Lazarus A, Varin J, Babuty D, Anselme F, Coste J, Duboc D. Long-term follow-up of arrhytmias in pa- tients with myotonic dystrophy treated by pacing:

A multicenter diagnostic pacemaker study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40: 1645–1652.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

This single-center prospective self-control study enrolled 32 patients who underwent LBBP, with complete right bundle branch block (cRBBB) but not incomplete or inter- mittent

Coronary angiogram revealed chron- ic-total-occlusion of the right coronary artery with coexisting occlusion of the left main (LM) as a culprit lesion (Figure 1A, 1B).. Due

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for two endpoints: all-cause mortality and the combination of all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure (HF) with regard to the

Conclusions: Male gender, QRS duration greater than 140 ms, discordant LBBB, and residual conduction in the left bundle branch seem to be markers of reduced LVEF in patients

A few days after the coronary angiogram, in ECG record, atrio-ventricular (AV) dissociation, sinus rhythm (HR of 55 bpm) with right bundle branch block (RBBB), and slightly

The 12-lead ECG showed atrial fibrillation with a mean heart rate of about 100 bpm, QRS duration 160 ms, QT in- terval 400 ms, right bundle-branch block (RBBB) based on the

Background: Due to difficulties in diagnosing coronary ischemia in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), identifying clinical characteristics that might help to

Suspicion of the acute myocardial infarction on the basis of presence of the Sgarbossa’s criteria: ST-segment depression in lead V1, V2 and V3, ST-segment elevation in lead III and