POLIMERY 2017, 62, nr 9 645 0 1 2 3 4 0.0 -0.4 -0.8 -1.2 -1.6 0.31 cm-1 0.18 cm-1 0.06 cm-1 I, mA SW/Vtot: Polymerization time, h 0 40 80 120 160 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 ln( I0 /It ) Polymerization time, s 0 1 2 3 4 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Polymerization time, h ln([M ]0 /[M] )
Fig. 1. Effect of SW/Vtot ratio on the synthesis of glucose-based
star polymers shown as: a) current profile, b) first order plot of current, c) first order kinetic plot of monomer conversion
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 1.1 1.2 1.3 Monomer conversion, % M n · 10 -3 M w /M n
Fig. 2. Effect of SW/Vtot ratio on evolution of Mn and Mw/Mn
ver-sus monomer conversion during the synthesis of glucose-based
star polymers 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 R2 = 0.868 (SW/Vtot)1/2, cm-1/2 ap p kp , h -1
Fig. 3. Effect of SW/Vtot ratio on apparent polymerization rate
coefficient (kapp
p )
In this case Rp is defined as [39]:
Rp = kp[M][Pn] = kp[M] [X-CuII/L] t app red k k • (2)
where: [Pn•] – concentration of propagating radicals.
The reduction of deactivator rate constant can be pre-sented as [38]: π = Do Vtot SW app kred (3) The kapp
p is proportional to the root of the reduction rate
constant [kapp
red = ln(I0/It)] [40] and, based on eq. (3), kpapp is
proportional to the square root of SW/Vtot.
The polymerization kinetics and linear molecular mass evolution with monomer conversion, illustrated in
Fig. 1c and Fig. 2, result in polymers with low Mw/Mn
val-ues (Fig. 4a–c). Furthermore, Mw/Mn were dependent on
SW, but still remained low, i.e., 1.14 at 87 % of monomer
conversion (SW/Vtot = 0.06 cm-1) (Fig. 4c).
a)
b)