• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Seiches over parabolic bottoms

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Seiches over parabolic bottoms"

Copied!
9
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

pRCH1E'

Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. (1967), 63, 1167 PCPS 63-136

With 5 text-figures Printed in Great Britain

Seiches over parabolic bottomst

By E. V. LAITONE

University of California, Berkeley

(Received 12 July 1966)

Abstract. The solutions are derived for the shallow water standing waves of small

amplitude that can form in channels or lakes of varying breadth with a concave

parabolic bottom. In addition explicit solutions are given for standing waves in a ring-type lake with a parabolic bottom and a central circular island that has vertical walls.

1. Introduction. The typical seiche in a lake or inside a harbour is a long period and

small amplitude oscillation of all of the contained water so as to form a so-called

standing wave. Since the amplitude is relatively very small when compared with the

tab.

y.

Scheepsbou'ikunde

Techrische

IiogeschGp67

Deift

Fig. i(a). Coordinate system for a rectangular cross-section channel. (b) Piane fundamental seiche with vertical dimensions stretched.

wavelength, and the motion is practically the same near the bottom as it is at the

surface for any given location, therefore the linearized shallow water wave theory is sufficient for analyzing the usual seiche motion. If, as shown in Figure 1, we let denote the ordinate of the wave profile, and let represent the horizontal displacement of the water from its equilibrium position at any given value of x, then the linearized shallow

water theory may be written as

_=....gi;

b?,=_(bhsc)

(1.1)

t This work was supported by the Fluid Dynamics Branch, U.S. Off ce of Naval Research under contract N(ONR)-3656 (07).

(2)

(2.2) 1168

for a rectangular cross-section channel of varying breadth b and depth h as shown by

Lamb (6).

One of the most extensive investigations of these shallow water waves over a para-bolic bottom was carried out by Cbrystal(2) who used (1.1) in the form

S=bh

(1.2)

which he then reduced to a simpler equation by introducing the new variables

U=S,

V=Jbdx

(1.3)

so that (1.2) could be written as

a2

a i

U] a2u

at2 = xLb1----i = gSb (1.4)

Then by using the method of Frobemus, Chrystal was able to obtain series solutions of (1.4) that would reduce to finite polynomials for a constant breadth channel with a

parabolic bottom. Haim (4) thon showed how the constant breadth channel with a

convex bottom had standing wave solutions related to hypergeometric functions, while

Chrystal's solutions for a concave parabolic bottom were given explicitly by the

Legendre polynomials. Previously Lamb (5) had already derived these Legendre

polynomial solutions for a constant breadth channel with a concave parabolic bottom. Lamb's derivation was much simpler than that of Chrystal and Haim because he found the wave proffle directly from (1.1) by writing it as

i a2

i a'(S,)

-

15

- S

a

-

+

,h

see also Wehausen and Laitone (7) where the limitations on these shallow water

equations are discussed. Although Chrystal's equation (1.4) may be more suitable for the numerical calculation of seiches in most actual lakes, and is still being used for that

purpose as shown by Defant (3), still (1.5) is much more suitable for investigating

shallow water seiches in bodies of water whose geometry can be expressed in terms of polynomials. As Chrystal (2) pointed out the concave parabolic bottom is probably the

best approximation for most cases so it will now be shown how the hypergeometric functions easily yield explicit polynomial solutions of (1.5) for seiches in various

varying breadth channels having a concave parabolic bottom defined by

(h/h0) = i - (x/a)2 i - (r/a)2. (1.6)

2. Seiches in rectangular cross-section channels. The simplest solutions of (1.5) can be

obtained by introducing the relations

(x,t)=iì()e,

=(x/a)

(21)

into (1.5) and (16) so as to obtain

= O, À2 = a2o2/c2, c2 = gh0

(3)

where

Seiches over parabolic bottoms 1169

Then if we express the varying breadth b as a polynomial in the form

(b/b0) =

(be/b) =p(l+)-1q(l)-'

(2.4)

we can reduce (2.2) to the hypergeometric equation

(1E)+[(pq)(p+q+2)fl+À2ìì = 0

(2.5)

which has the following solution, see Whittaker and Watson (8), for any p > - i

(cL)(/J) /1+\

=

F(fi;

'

2

) =

n=o

(y)n!

2 )

(x)=x(+1)...(+nl),

(c.)0= 1,

y=(p+l) >0,

(+fi) = (p+q+ 1),

OEfi = = (a2o2/c2) > 0.

(2.6)

On the other hand if p is a negative integer the solution of (2.5) becomes, see Whittaker and Watson (8) ??h10 = (

l±)MF(

M,/3+M; i + M;

i

(2.7) where

M = (ly) = p = 1,2,3,

...,

(+fi) =

(qM+ 1),fi = À2 = (a2o2/c2) >0.

These solutions reduce to simple polynomials if either c or

fi

is a negative integer. For example, if we consider the case wherein p > - i we obtain from (2.6)

z=n= 1,2,3,...,fi=(n+1+p+q), y=(p+l) >0

(28) so that the solution of (1.5) may be written for p> - i as

(x,t) = ,0F(n.n+ 1+p+q; p+ 1; -(1+x/a))coso-t,l

À2= (a2a2/c2)=n(n+1+p+q).

J

As a simple example of (2.9) let us consider the case when p = i = q so that

(b/b0) = (1x2/a2) = (h/h0),

n(xt)=ioF(_nn+3;2; l+9a)cosot,

(2.10)

= (c/a) (n2 + 3n)l.

The channel and the wave proffles at t = O are shown in Figure 2 for n = 1, 2 and 3.

However, if p is a negative integer (- M), we then obtain a polynomial solution of

(1.5) by means of (27) by letting (a+M) = nso that

i+M;

1+xIa)cost

À2 = (a2rx2/c2) = (n (b/b0) = (1+x/a)_M(1_x/a),

(2.9)

(4)

h/h.

10

05

05

10

Fig. 2. Seiches in a closed channel defined by (2-lo).

As a final illustration we find that (2-11), or (2.9) after a linear transformation, gives the channel and wave profiles showii in Figure 4 for M = i = q in (2.11). For p = i = - q we find that (2.9) directly gives the mirror image of Figure 4.

The only example that has been previously given of the new family of solutions

represented by (2.4), (2.9) and (2-11) is the case of the constant breadth channel which

was first derived by Lamb (5), and later by Chrystal(2). In this case we

find that

M

= p =

O = q so that (2.9) and (2-11) both reduce to i

l+x/a)

= i0P(x/a)cos o-t,

o-= (c/a) (n2 + n)i

as given by Lamb (5, 6).

(2.13) where now M is a positive integer and q can be any real number. For example, if we

take M = i = q we have

(b/b0) = (1x2/a2)1 = (h0/h),

(x,t)=O(l+:/a)F(n,n+l;2; l+x!a).t

(2-12)

o- = (c/a)(n2+m)l.

(5)

Seiches over parabolic bottoms

1171 3. Seiches in a circular basin. The shallow water waves in a circular basin with a

parabolic bottom as defined by (1.6) have already been studied by Lamb (6). However, we shall re-derive Lamb's equations so as to present them in a simpler form. Then later in section 4 we will apply these solutions to analyze the seiches in a circular lake with a

central island; that is, a ring-type lake with a parabolic bottom having a circular

cylinder projecting vertically from its center.

where 10 05 b/b, O

05

10

15

025

025

Fig. 3. Seiches in an open-ended channel defined by (2.12).

Lamb (6) page 292, shows that for a circular basin with a parabolic bottom (1 5) must be replaced by

r2( i - r2/a2) fl,.,. + (1 - 3r2/a2) r/,. + {(À + m2) (r2/a2) - m2] = O, (3.1)

Q;,

i(r, O, t) = ij(r) eimoei, À2 = a2o2/c2, c2 = gh0.

Now if we introduce the variable z r2/a2 we transform (3.1) to a recognizable form of

the hypergeometric equation that was extensively studied by Chaplygin (1) for

two-dimensional, isentropic gas flow in the hodograph plane, namely

z2(1z)+(1-2z)z+[(À2+m2)zm2]iì = 0

(3.2)

with a solution that is analytic at the origin given by

=

zl''F(4,u+ m, 1 ,u+ m; i +m; z)eimoe,

(6)

as shown by Chaplygin(1), and Whittaker and Watson ((8), page 283). If we use the

positive root sign for u in (33) we obtain

= (c/a) (t2-2m2 )+

10 05 b/b0 0

05

10

10 05

05

10

Fig. 4. Seiches in a channel closed at on.ly one end.

and a solution corresponding to that given by Lamb ((6), page 292). However, if we

use the negative root sign for 1a we can obtain the following foi m = O,

= -2n = [(1+ A)2 1] < O,

(r,t) = 't;i0F(n,n+l; 1;r2/a2)cosot

(34)

= 0P(1 - 2r2/a2) cosot, o- = (c/a) (4n2 + 4n)i.

This is the solution for the symmetrical seiche, independent of O, which is indicated by the footnote in Lamb ((6), page 292). Now a more useful form of the solution for m + O may be obtained by noting that (33) reduces to a finite polynomial if we write

4a=_(2n+m)=_[(1+A2+rn2)_1]< O,

= ,/o(r/a)mF(_n,n+ i +m; i +m; r2/a2)cosmO cosot,'t (35)

(7)

Seiches over parabolic bottoms

1173 Obviously (34) is a special case of (35) when m = O, and it is found that any integer

values of m and n give the same polynomial solution as does the series expansion given

by Lamb, or the equation given in Wehausen and Laitone ((7), page 672). For any

m + O the lowest frequency is given by taking n = O in (3.5) so as to obtain

ii(r, O, t) = ìì0(r/a)m cos mO cos (2m) ct/a. (36)

The fundamental fi equency corresponds to m = i so for the lowest frequency the free surface is always plane as indicated in Figure lb.

4. Seiches in a ring-type lake. Now we can also present some explicit solutions for shallow water waves in a ring-type lake with a parabolic bottom defined by

(h/h0) = (lr2/a2) (ar?b>O),

hr(a) = - 2h0/a, hr(b) = cc.

This iepresents a circular basin with a circular cylinder placed vertically at the centre of the parabolic bottom. Consequently our additional boundary condition becomes

ia

--=--=O at rb.

(4.2)

The usual method of satisfying this additional boundary condition is to obtain a second solution of (3.1) so that its arbitrary constant will enable one to satisfy (4.2) when the

two solutions are combined. However, the solutions of (3.1) are restricted to integer

values of m because we must have

'(r,O,t)

= ì(r,2iT,t). (4.3)

Consequently the second solution of (3.1) for m an integer is an infinite series which is

not convergent at r = a as shown by Whittaker and Watson (8). For the symmetrical

seiche which is independent of O so that ni = O the second solution, which is related to (3.4), is now given by the Legendre function of the second kind as

Q(1 - 2r2/a2) cos o-t (4.4)

but this solution is also infinite at r = a so it cannot be used to satisfy (4.1) and (4.2). As a matter of fact both (34) and (35) also yield an infinite series which is divergent

at r = a unless n is an integer, in which case they both reduce to a finite polynomial.

Consequently the only useful solutions provided by (3.5) are those polynomials which

are given by restricting m and n to positive integers including zero. However these

simple solutions can also be used to satisfy (4.1) and (4.2) for certain ratios of a/b by

noting that at the crest of any standing wave defined by (3.5) we always have j,. O

so that the boundary condition (4.2) is automatically satisfied at some fixed value of r = b. Therefore a solution for a seiche in a ring-type lake is obtained by setting the

derivative of (3.5), with respect to r, equal to zero so as to obtain the relation

o = (!

' {F(_nn+1+m;

1-i-m; r2/a2)

(2n)(1+n+m) (r)2F(+

1,2+n+m; 2+ni;

r2/a2)]. m(1+m) a (4.1) (4.5)

(8)

1174

As an example if we let n = i then a whole family of ring-type lakes is defined by

(b/a) = 0471. (46)

Other cases are easily analysed by the direct application of (45), which also may be used for symmetrical seiches (m = 0) since then the roots of the polynomial that is

given by F( - n + 1, n +2; 2; b2/a2) = 0 (4.7) i 5

05

\

r=b=05257a

/

(4.9) 08 09 f/a 10

1 0

-Fig. 5. Comparison of the fundamental seiche in a ring-type lake (b/a = 0.5257) and either a parabolic bottom (4.8), or a flat bottom (4-9).

determine the proper ratios of b/a. For example, if n = 3 when m = 0, we obtain from (3.5) and (4.7) the seiche proffle in a ring-type lake as

(1 - 12x2 + 30x4 - 20x6) cos (ß.928ct/a), (r/a) = x 1, (b/a) = OE5257 or 08507.

This solution is compared in Figure 5, for the case where b/a = 05257 in a ring-type lake with a flat horizontal bottom and vertical walls at r = a, as well as at r = b. The

solution for such a horizontal bottom is given in Wehausen and Laitone ((7), page 672)

and may be written in terms of the Bessel functions of the first and second kind of

order zero, as

[J0(6.75x)-0.27Y(6.75x)]cos(6.75ct/a), 05257 x = (r/a) 1. (4.9)

It is seen that both the frequency and the wave profile near the island (r = b) are

nearly the same. However, the wave amplitude is much larger for the parabolic

bottom at r = a, as would be expected.

Conclusions. New solutions are derived for shallow water seiches over a parabolic

bottom. Equations (2.9) and (2.11) give explicit solutions for a rectangular cross-section channel with any varying breadth that can be represented by a polynomial. (4.8) 10 05 (48) N-. \... I I 0 1 02 03 :-04 05

(9)

Seiches over parabolic bottoms

1175 Several simple polynomial solutions are shown in Figures 2-4. The only solution that

had been previously presented is that for the constant breadth channel, (2.13).

Equation (35) gives the polynomial solutions for the seiches in a circular basin with a parabolic bottom in a more useful form than that previously given by Lamb (6). Equation (4.5) determines the numerical values of (35) that will correspond to the

seiche formed in a ring-type lake with a parabolic bottom and a central circular island that has vertical walls. These relations provide the only polynomial solutions for this

problem, and it is found that only certain ratios of island to lake radius can have

finite polynomial solutions. One example is presented in Figure 5 in comparison with

the seiche produced in a ring-type lake with a flat bottom and vertical walls.

REFERENCES

CRAPLYGIN, S. Gas jets, NACA TM 1063 (1944) (Moscow University, 1902).

CERYSTAL, G. On the hydrodynamical theory of seiches. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 41, (1906), 599-649.

DEFANT, A. Physical oceanography, vol. u (Pergamon Press, 1961), pp. 160-173.

HALM, J. On a group of linear differential equations of the 2nd order including Professor Chrystal's seiche-equations. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 41, (1906), 651-676.

LAMB, H. Hydrodynamics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1895), Section 182. LAIVn3, H. Hydrodynamics, 6th ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1932; Dover Publications,

New York, 1945), 273-277, 291-292.

WEMAUSEN, J. V. and LATTONE, E. V. Surface waves. Handbuch der Physik 9 (1960), 668-673.

WHITTAKER, E. T. and WATSON, G. N. Modern analysis, 4th ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1927), 281-286, 318.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

A miniature car moves in a straight line, starting at the point (2, 0).. Eventually, the two miniature

In this section, under some assumptions, we show that the solution v of (4)–(6) quenches in a finite time and estimate its quenching time.. Using an idea of Friedman and McLeod in

[r]

We make some remarks concerning the necessity of compatibility conditions for some estimates and existence theorems appearing in the literature... However, it

With the aid of the method o f successive approximations applied to an appropriate system o f Volt err a’s integral equations there was proved the existence o f

The employment of a Banach space В instead of the Euclidean space R enables us to obtain various classes of equations with parameter... Various results

ANNALES SOCIETATIS MATHEMATÎCAE POLONAE Series I: COMMENTATîONES MATHEMATICAE XXV (1985) ROCZNIKI POLSK1EGO TOWARZYSTWA MATEMATYCZNEGO1. Séria I: PRACE MATEMATYCZNE

ANNALES SOCIETATIS MATHEMATICAE POLONAE Serio I: COMMENTATIONES MATHEMATICAE X