Environmental levels of triclosan and male fertility.

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Environmental levels of triclosan and male fertility

&Bartosz Wielgomas4&Paweł Kałużny1

&Anna Klimowska4&Paweł Radwan2 & Wojciech Hanke1

Received: 25 July 2017 / Accepted: 28 November 2017 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract

Triclosan is a synthetic chemical with broad antimicrobial activity that has been used extensively in consumer products, including personal care products, textiles, and plastic kitchenware, although the exposure which is widespread evidence from human studies is scarce. Our study aims to investigate the relationship between triclosan exposure and male fertility. Triclosan (TCS) urinary concentrations were measured using gas chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry in 315 men recruited from a male reproductive health clinic with normal sperm concentration (≥ 15 mln/ml) (WHO2010) under 45 years of age. Participants were interviewed and provided a semen sample. TCS was detected in 84.13% of urine samples, with a median concentration of 2.83μg/l (2.57 μg/g creatinine). A multiple linear regression analysis showed a positive association between the urinary concentrations of triclosan 50th–75th percentile and ≥ 50 percentile and percentage of sperm with abnormal morphology (p = 0.016 and p = 0.002, respectively). The study provides evidence that exposure to triclosan is associated with poorer semen quality. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Keywords Environmental exposure to triclosan . Semen quality . DNA fragmentation . Sperm aneuploidy . Male fertility

Introduction

Triclosan (2,4,4 1-trichloro-2 1-hydroxy-diphenyl ether, TCS) is a broad-spectrum antibacterial and antifungal agent, widely used in personal care, household, veterinary, and industrial products (Rodricks et al.2010).

The manufacture of TCS on a massive scale started in the 1970s, because it was considered to have low acute toxicity,

and 20 years later, the compound reached the top 10 detected contaminants in American river (Halden2014). In humans, ingestion and dermal absorption are the main routes of triclo-san exposure (Sandborgh-Englund et al.2006). After absorp-tion in humans, TCS can be detected in urine, blood, milk, and plasma, the brain, adipose tissue, and liver (Wang and Tian

2015; Geens et al. 2012). Most of the absorbed doses are eliminated from the body within 24 h, mostly through with urine (Huang et al.2016). Due to the rapid urinary excretion and the different exposure sources, the extracted concentration may vary over the day and between days (Lassen et al.2013). Recently, TCS has been suspected to be reproductive tox-icant. Animal studies suggest that TCS exposure can decrease weights of the testes, sex organs, and sperm density (Kumar et al.2008). It adversely affects the male reproductive system by disrupting steroidogenesis. Kumar et al. 2008conducted in vitro studies in rodent Leydig cells and found that TCS depressed the synthesis of cAMP resulting in disruption of the steroidogenic cascade and leading to decreased testoster-one synthesis (Kumar et al.2009, Lan et al.2015). The evi-dences of triclosan’s potential effects in human reproduction are still limited and conflicting. Zhou et al. 2016measured urinary TCS concentration in men recruited through reproduc-tive clinics and found decrease in sperm concentration, sperm The work was done at the Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine,

Lodz, Poland.

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues * Joanna Jurewicz

joanna.jurewicz@imp.lodz.pl

1

Department of Environmental Epidemiology, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 8 Teresy, 91-362 Lodz, Poland

2 _{Department of Gynecology and Reproduction,BGameta^ Hospital,}

34/36 Rudzka, 95-030 Rzgów, Poland

3

Faculty of Health Sciences, The State University of Applied Sciences in Płock, 2 Dąbrowskiego Square, 09-402 Płock, Poland

4

Department of Toxicology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 107 Hallera St, Gdańsk, Poland

count, the number of forward moving sperms, and the number of normally morphologic sperms (Zhou et al.2016). Urinary levels of triclosan were negatively associated with reproduc-tive hormones: inhibin B and LH (Den Hond et al.2015). Additionally, urinary triclosan concentrations were inversely associated with early outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) (top quality embryo formation and implan-tation rate) observed in women undergoing IVF-ET in China (Hua et al.2017). Another study performed in China found no relationship between TCS exposure and idiopathic male infer-tility (Chen et al.2013). Our aim was to study, for the first time, the association between environmental exposure to tri-closan and male fertility, as indicated by semen quality (sperm concertation, motility, morphology, CASA parameters), sperm DNA damage, the level of reproductive hormones (FSH, testosterone, estradiol), and the total sperm disomy in adult men.

Materials and methods

Study participants and data collection

Males attending infertility clinic in Lodz, Poland, for diagnos-tic purposes with normal semen concentration of≥ 15 mln/ml or (WHO2010) between 2008 and 2011 were recruited. The details of the study population and recruitment were presented elsewhere (Jurewicz et al.2014). Briefly, men under 45 years of age were eligible for study recruitment. All participants obtained and signed written informed consents prior to enroll-ment. Upon recruitment, a questionnaire was assigned to each participant to collect the data including demographic charac-teristics, occupational exposures, medical history, and lifestyle factors. Additionally, participants provided urine, saliva, blood, and semen samples on the same day of their clinic visit. Cotinine level in the saliva was measured to verify the smoking status as previously described (Jurewicz et al.2014).

Semen and reproductive hormones analysis

After the abstinence period, semen samples were generated via masturbation into polypropylene containers. Samples were liq-uefied at 37 °C for 20 min before analysis and semen parame-ters of sperm concentration, motility, and motion parameparame-ters were assessed according to World Health Organization (WHO

2010) guidelines. Analysis of the samples took place at the Andrology Laboratory with andrologists blinded to exposure status. The volume, pH, color, and viscosity were determined for each sample. Sperm morphology was quantified using strict Kruger criteria to classify men as having normal or below nor-mal morphology (Jurewicz et al.2014; Kruger et al.1988). The detailed information about semen parameters analysis have been previously described (Jurewicz et al.2014).

Sperm DNA damage was assessed based on sperm chro-matin structure assay (SCSA) using flow cytometry (DAKO Galaxym DAKO, Denmark) (ASRM 2006, Evenson et al.

1999). The full details of the analysis of sperm DNA damage are presented elsewhere (Jurewicz et al.2015).

To assess sperm aneuploidy, multicolor FISH analysis was performed using DNA probes specific for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, Y (AneuVysion DNA Probe Kit, VYSIS) as previ-ously described (Radwan et al.2015; Jurewicz et al. 2013). Based on this information about six types of chromosome disomies, total disomy was calculated.

C h e m i l u m i ne s ce n t M i cr o pa r t i c l e I m m u n oa s s a y (ARCHITECT System; Abbott, Longford, Ireland) method was used to measure the levels of FSH, testosterone, and es-tradiol as previously described (Jurewicz et al.2014).

Urinary triclosan concentrations

Single, spot urine samples were collected and frozen at – 20 °C and sent to the laboratory in the Department of Toxicology, Medical University of Gdańsk. Analyses were performed using gas chromatography (Varian GC-450) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (Varian 220-MS, ion-trap mass spectrometer).

Three milliliters of urine was placed in 10-ml screw-cap glass tube followed by 50μl of mixed internal standard solu-tion and 750μl of freshly prepared acetate buffer (1 M, pH 5.0) containing 230 U of β-glucuronidase was added. Overnight incubation (at least 12 h) at 37 °C was performed. Then the sample was acidified with 450μl of 80% formic acid and 3 ml of HEX:MTBE mixture (3:1,v:v) was added to the sample and tube was shaken for 10 min. After centrifugation, the organic layer was transferred into open glass tube and the extraction was repeated. Combined extracts were cleaned-up with 200 mg of MgSO4 and 10 mg of PSA by shaking in hands for 1 min. Then 5 ml of cleaned extract was transferred into new open glass tube and evaporated to dryness under stream of nitrogen at 35 °C. The residue was dissolved with 50μl of BSTFA:TMCS (99:1) and derivatized for 30 min at 40 °C. One microliter of final extract was analyzed by GC-MS/MS. The limit of detection was 0.5μg/L.

Statistical analysis

Data management and statistical analysis were performed with R statistical software (ver.3) (R Core Team2016). In case of the measurements below the limit of detection (LOD), 1/2 LOD was inputted. The proportion of samples below the limit of detection (LOD) was 15.87%. Descriptive statistics for subjects grouped by demographic characteristics were calcu-lated, along with the distributions of urinary triclosan, and semen quality and reproductive hormone levels. Multiple least-squares linear regression models were used to quantify

the associations of urinary triclosan (explanatory variables) with selected sperm quality measures and the concentrations of reproductive hormones as dependent variables. All expo-sure data were log transformed to obtain a normal distribution. Additionally, motility, percentage of sperm with abnormal morphology, DFI, and HDS were also subjected to shifted log transformation log(1 + x), to obtain more systematic quasi-normal distributions.

Negative binomial regression models were utilized for sperm disomy with the count of disomy outcome as the de-pendent variable and triclosan, with potential confounders as the independent variables. Disomy counts in binomial regres-sion models were log transformed.

Creatinine-adjusted triclosan concentrations were catego-rized into four groups: first one consisted of values below limit of detection (LOD) to 25th percentile value, second—greater than the 25th percentile value to the median, third—greater than the median to 75th percentile value, while the fourth group consisted of values greater than the 75th percentile. Additionally, urinary concentrations of triclosan were present-ed as continuous variables and in categories below and above median.

Confounding factors in multiple regression models were predefined based on literature and biological consideration. The variables considered as the potential confounders includ-ed sexual abstinence (continuous), age (continuous), smoking (yes/no), past diseases (yes/no), and alcohol consumption (none or < 1 drink/week, 1–3 drinks/week, 4–7 drinks per week). Additionally, sperm disomy model was adjusted for sperm concentration and motility. Ap value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Demographic characteristics, semen quality parameters, level of reproductive hormones, and urine triclosan concentration are presented in Tables1 and2. A total of 315 men who attended infertility clinics for diagnostic purposes were en-rolled in the study, mostly with higher (41.6%) or secondary (37.8%) education. The average age of the participants was 31.6 years. The average BMI was 26.8 ± 3.4 kg/m2. Most of the participants were nonsmokers (71%) (Table1). Urinary concentrations of triclosan are presented in Table2. The con-centrations of total (free plus conjugated) triclosan were de-tected in 84.13% of samples at concentrations of 0.506– 789.20μg/l. The geometric mean and 95th percentile concen-trations were 4.75μg/l (4.27 μg/g creatinine) and 425.55 μg/l (362.21μg/g creatinine), respectively. The mean semen con-centration was 50.6 mln/ml (SD = 52.4, median 32.6) (Table2). The mean percentage of DNA fragmentation index (DFI) was 16.5% (SD = 11.4%) (median 14%), high DNA stainability (HDS) was 7.7% (SD 3.9%) (median 7.16%),

and total disomy was 1.72% (SD = 0.92) (median 0.82) (Table2).

Triclosan concentration and the relevant male fertility out-comes are presented in Table3. We observed that significant positive associations were observed between the urinary con-centrations of triclosan 50th–75th percentile and percentage of sperm with abnormal morphology (p = 0.016) compared to urinary concentrations of triclosan < 25th percentile. Additionally, urinary concentrations of triclosan ≥ 50th per-centile was also positively associated with percentage of Table 1 Characteristics of the study population,N = 315

Characteristics Education,n (%)

Primary and vocational 65 (20.6)

Secondary 119 (37.8)

Higher 131 (41.6)

Smoking determined by cotinine level,n (%)

No 224 (71.1) Yes 91 (28.9) BMI (kg/m2_{),n (%)} < 25 106 (33.7) ≥ 25 209 (66.4) Mean (sd) 26.8 ± 3.4 Median (min–max) 27.6 (18.3–39.5) Duration of couple’s infertility (years), n (%)

1–2 120 (38.1)

2–3 104 (33.0)

3–5 45 (14.3)

> 5 46 (14.6)

Past diseases, which may have impact on semen quality,n (%)

No 276 (87.6) Yes 39 (12.4) Abstinence [days],n (%) < 3 11 (3.5) 3–7 242 (76.8) > 7 16 (5.1) Missing data 46 (14.6) Mean (sd) 5.0 ± 2.3

Median (min–max) 5.0 (0.0–20.0) Age [years] Mean (sd) 32.14(4.2) Median (min–max) 31.60 (22.01–44.3) Alcohol use n(%) None or < 1 drink/week 104 (33.0) 1–3 drinks/week 163 (51.8) Everyday 48 (15.2)

Past diseases which may have impact on semen quality—mumps, crypt-orchidism, testes surgery, and testes trauma

sperm with abnormal morphology (p = 0.002) compared to urinary concentrations of triclosan < 50th percentile (Table3).

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the association between environ-mental exposure to triclosan and male fertility. We demon-strate, for the first time, the associations between triclosan exposure and different semen quality parameters (sperm concertation, motility, morphology, CASA parameters), sperm DNA damage, the level of reproductive hormones (FSH, testosterone, estradiol), and the total sperm disomy in adult men. The results of the present study suggest that urinary levels of triclosan increase the percentage of sperm with ab-normal morphology. These findings suggest that environmen-tal exposure to triclosan may affect semen quality.

The results are in agreement with the study performed by Zhu et al.2016where the environmental exposure to triclosan was inversely associated with the number of normally mor-phologic sperm, whereas no association between the level of triclosan with other semen parameters (sperm concentration, motility, CASA parameters), sperm DNA damage, sperm disomy and the level of reproductive hormones was observed. On the other hand, in a study performed in Belgium, TCS level was associated with decrease in the level of inhibin B and LH (Den Hond2015). Those hormones were not analyzed in our study.

The biological mechanism of the impact of triclosan on semen quality is unclear but in vitro studies have demonstrat-ed that TCS can bind with low affinity with estrogen and androgen receptors and to act as their agonist, antagonist or to result in no action (Witorsch2014). It adversely affects the male reproductive system by disrupting steroidogenesis. Kumar et al. 2008 conducted in vitro studies in rodent Leydig cells and found that TCS depressed the synthesis of cAMP resulting in disruption of the steroidogenic cascade and leading to decreased testosterone synthesis. Forgacs et al.

2015found that high doses of TCS inhibited testosterone syn-thesis but only rhCG-induced synsyn-thesis, while basal testoster-one production remained unaffected. Kumar et al.2009 car-ried out an in vivo study in rodent Leydig cells and found that higher doses of TCS caused a significant decrease in testis weight and sex accessory tissues. Another finding was the downregulation of testicular levels of mRNA for cytochrome P450scc, cytochrome P450c17, 3β-HSD, 17β-HSD, StAR, AR, and a decreased in vitro activity of testicular steroidogen-ic enzymes. They also reported decreased levels of serum LH, FSH, cholesterol, pregnenolone, and testosterone. All these findings were followed by decreased semen production (Kumar et al.2009).

The urinary concentrations of triclosan in our study was lower compared to American level GM = 4.74 and 16.2μg/l, respectively (NHANES 2009). Whereas compared to European countries, the level was similar to Belgium (GM = 2–3 μg/l) (Den Hond et al.2015) and Spain (GM = 6.1μg/l) Table 2 Semen quality, the level of reproductive hormones, and urinary concentrations of triclosan among study participants

Semen quality Selected descriptive statistics

Min 25% 50% 75% 95% Max AM ± SD GM ± SD N Frequency of detection Main semen parameters

Concentration (mln/ml) 15.0 22.5 32.6 85.8 125.0 360.0 50.6 ± 52.4 – 334 – Motility (%) 4.0 46.0 55.0 66.0 83.0 99.0 55.7 ± 19.9 – 315 – Sperm with abnormal morphology [%] 11.0 31.2 50.0 69.5 75.3 96.0 53.7 ± 23.9 – 315 – CASA parameters

VSL (μm/s) 14.9 37 43.1 50.7 61.4 77.1 43.6 ± 10.3 – 315 –

VCL (μm/s) 20.8 37.5 79.0 92.0 108.0 146.0 78.1 ± 16.8 – 306 –

LIN (%) 20.0 51.0 56.0 61.0 66.1 74.0 56 ± 6.4 – 315 –

DNA fragmentation index

DFI 2.7 8.3 14.0 20.4 41.2 68.7 16.5 ± 11.4 – 262 –

HDS 0.7 5.2 7.2 9.3 13.5 30.7 7.7 ± 3.9 – 262 –

Total disomy 0 0.70 0.82 0.91 1.89 1.20 1.72 ± 0.92 220

Triclosan concentration in urine

Triclosan unadjusted (μg/l) <LOD 0.84 2.83 21.49 425.55 789.20 57.71 ± 138.16 4.75 ± 9.92 315 84.13% Triclosan CR-adjusted (μg/g creat) <LOD 0.79 2.57 20.78 362.21 587.30 55.22 ± 121.78 4.27 ± 7.81 315 84.13%

VSL straight-line velocity, VCL curvilinear velocity, LIN linearity, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, HDS high DNA stainability, DFI DNA fragmen-tation index,AM arithmetic mean, GM geometric mean, SD standard deviation

Table 3 Triclosan concentration in urine and semen quality and the level of reproductive hormones-categories of urinary triclosan concentrations

Triclosan Triclosan

coef 95%CI p coef 95%CI p

Sperm concentration ≤ 25th ref < 50th ref

25th–50th − 0.18 − 0.52; 0.15 0.29 50th–75th 0.03 − 0.31; 0.37 0.86

> 75th − 0.05 − 0.39; 0.30 0.79 ≥ 50th 0.08 − 0.16; 0.33 0.49 cont − 0.02 − 0.08; 0.05 0.57

Motility ≤ 25th ref < 50th ref

25th–50th 3.10 − 3.25; 9.46 0.34 50th–75th 1.92 − 4.52; 8.35 0.56 > 75th 1.39 − 5.09; 7.86 0.67 ≥ 50th 0.10 − 4.48; 4.68 0.97 cont 0.21 − 1.03; 1.45 0.73 % of sperm with abnormal morphology ≤ 25th ref < 50th ref 25th–50th − 0.91 − 8.46; 6.65 0.81 50th–75th 9.37 1.74; 16.99 0.016 > 75th 6.84 − 0.84; 14.52 0.08 ≥ 50th 8.57 3.14; 13.99 0.002 cont 1.44 − 0.05; 2.92 0.06 VCL ≤ 25th ref < 50th ref 25th–50th −0.93 − 3.71; 1.86 0.51 50th–75th 0.68 − 2.14; 3.49 0.64 > 75th 1.86 − 0.97; 4.68 0.20 ≥ 50th 1.73 − 0.28; 3.73 0.09 cont 0.19 − 0.35; 0.74 0.49 VSL ≤ 25th ref < 50th ref 25th–50th −0.25 − 3.56; 3.07 0.89 50th–75th 1.85 − 1.50; 5.20 0.28 > 75th 1 − 2.37; 4.37 0.56 ≥ 50th 1.55 − 0.83; 3.93 0.20 cont 0.19 − 0.45; 0.84 0.55

LIN ≤ 25th ref < 50th ref

25th–50th 0.37 − 1.68; 2.42 0.72 50th–75th 1.14 − 0.93; 3.21 0.28

> 75th −0.53 − 2.61; 1.55 0.61 ≥ 50th 0.12 −1.35; 1.60 0.87 cont −0.01 − 0.41; 0.39 0.97

Total disomy ≤ 25th ref < 50th ref

25th–50th 1.05 0.88; 1.23 0.89

50th–75th 1.02 0.80; 1.29 0.85 ≥ 50 th 1.15 0.22; 1.17 0.85 > 75 th 1.18 0.33; 3.28 0.77

cont 1.22 0.44; 1.33 0.68

DFI ≤ 25th ref < 50th ref

25th–50th 0.12 − 0.16; 0.41 0.40 50th–75th − 0.19 − 0.48; 0.1 0.20 > 75 th − 0.06 − 0.34; 0.21 0.65 ≥ 50th − 0.18 − 0.39; 0.03 0.10 cont − 0.03 − 0.08; 0.02 0.24 HDS ≤ 25th ref < 50th ref 25th–50th − 0.89 − 2.8; 1.02 0.36 50th–75th − 0.57 − 2.49; 1.35 0.56 > 75th − 0.71 − 2.55; 1.12 0.44 ≥ 50th − 0.25 − 1.64; 1.13 0.72 cont − 0.01 − 0.35; 0.33 0.94

Statistically significant at the level 0.05. Multivariate model adjusted for sexual abstinence, age, smoking, alcohol consumption, past diseases, and creatinine. Total disomy model additionally adjusted for sperm concentration and motility. Italic values indicate significance level 0.05 was used for statistical intereference.

coef ß coefficient, cont continuous variable, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, HDS high DNA stainability, DFI DNA fragmentation index, TES testosterone

(Casas et al.2011) and higher compared to China (GM = 1.12μg/l) (Zhu et al. 2016).

Triclosan and other nonpersistant chemicals have a short half-life; they are rapidly metabolized and could be totally excreted from the body in less than 24 h after exposure (Sandborgh-Englund et al.2006). In our study, only one, spot urine sample was collected, so the misclassification of TC exposure is possible. However, stable, habitual lifestyle, and activity patterns may impact on stable exposure to triclosan and may represent individual’s general exposure level. Additionally, studies of temporal variability in urinary excre-tion of TCS have indicated reasonable temporal consistency in triclosan excretion (Lassen et al.2013). Also, Pollack et al.

2016demonstrated fair to good reliability for one urine sam-ple for TCS. Second, since this is a cross-sectional study, the nature of this study does not allow the determination of cau-sality of the observed associations.

The present study was conducted among men from infer-tility clinic, so it may limit the generalization the results to the general population. To limit this disadvantage, we recruit only men with normal semen parameters according to WHO clas-sification (WHO2010) (Jurewicz et al.2014).

This is the first study, which assesses the semen quality, sperm DNA measures, level of reproductive hormones, and the total disomy in one study. Additionally, the total sperm disomy and sperm DNA damage were not analyzed in relation to triclosan exposure. A detailed questionnaire performed among study participants allowed for control of confounding factors. Also, the smoking status was confirmed by analyses the level of cotinine in saliva.

In conclusion, we have investigated the association be-tween exposure to triclosan and male fertility measured by semen quality parameters, sperm DNA damage, total sperm disomy, and the level of reproductive hormones. We observed that triclosan exposure can increase the percentage of sperm with abnormal morphology. These findings provide one of the first evidence of adverse effects of triclosan exposure on male fertility. The results of the current study support the hypothesis that endocrine-disrupting chemicals are important factors for declining male semen quality. Those findings need to be con-firmed in future studies.

Funding information This study was performed under the projectBThe association between environmental exposure to widespread man made endocrine-disrupting chemicals and level of hormones associated with the activity of hypothalamic pituitary testicular axis among young men^ supported by the National Science Centre in Poland from grant no. UMO-2014/13/B/NZ7/02223 and the project financed with a grant for statutory activity IMP 10.31/2017.

Compliance with ethical standards All participants obtained and signed written informed consents prior to enrollment.

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative C o m m o n s A t t r i b u t i o n 4 . 0 I n t e r n a t i o n a l L i c e n s e ( h t t p : / / creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appro-priate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

References

ASRM Practice Committee (2006) Report on optimal evaluation of the infertile male. Fertil Steril 86(4):202–209

Casas L, Fernandez MF, Llop S, Guxens M, Ballester F, Olea N, Irurzun MB, Rodriguez LS, Riano I, Tardon A, Vrijheid M, Calafat AM, Sunyer J, INMA Project (2011) Urinary concentrations of phthalates and phenols in a population of Spanish pregnant women and chil-dren. Environ Int 37(5):858–866.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint. 2011.02.012

Chen M, Tang R, Fu G, Xu B, Zhu P, Qiao S, Chen X, Qin Y, Lu C, Hang B, Xu B, Qin Y, Lu C, Hang B, Xia Y, Wang X (2013) Association of exposure to phenols and idiopathic male infertility. J Hazard Mater 250–251:115–121.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013. 01.061

Den Hond E, Tournaye H, De Sutter P, Ombelet W, Baeyens W, Covaci A, Cox B, Nawrot TS, Van Larebeke N, D’Hooghe T (2015) Human exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals and fertility: a case-control study in male subfertility patients. Environ Int 84:154–160.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.07.017

Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zinaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K, de Angelis P, Claussen OP (1999) Utility of the sperm chromatin struc-ture assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod 14(4):1039–1049.https://doi.org/10.1093/ humrep/14.4.1039

Forgacs AL, Ding Q, Jaremba RG, Huhtaniemi IT, Rahman NA, Zacharewski TR (2015) Bltk1 murine leydig cells: a novel steroido-genic model for evaluating the effects of reproductive and develop-mental toxicants. Toxicol Sci: Off J Soc Toxicol 127:391–402 Geens T, Neels H, Covaci A (2012) Distribution of bisphenol-A, triclosan

and n-nonylphenol in human adipose tissue, liver and brain. Chemosphere 87(7):796–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chemosphere.2012.01.002

Halden RU (2014) On the need and speed of regulating triclosan and triclocarban in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 48(7):3603– 3611.https://doi.org/10.1021/es500495p

Hua R, Zhou Y, Wu B, Huang Z, Zhu Y, Song Y, Yu Y, Li H, Quan S (2017) Urinary triclosan concentrations and early outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Reproduction 153(3):319– 325.https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-16-0501

Huang C-L, Abass OK, C-P Y (2016) Triclosan: a review on systematic risk assessment and control from the perspective of substance flow analysis. Sci Total Environ 566:771–785.https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2016.05.002

Jurewicz J, Radwan M, Sobala W, Ligocka D, Radwan P, Bochenek M, Hawuła W, Jakubowski L, Hanke W (2013) Human urinary phthal-ate metabolites level and main semen parameters, sperm chromatin structure, sperm aneuploidy and reproductive hormones. Reprod Toxicol 42:232–241.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.10. 001

Jurewicz J, Radwan M, Sobala W, Ligocka D, Radwan P, Bochenek M, Hanke W (2014) Lifestyle and semen quality—role of modifiable risk factors. Syst Biol Reprod Med 60(1):43–51.https://doi.org/10. 3109/19396368.2013.840687

Jurewicz J, Radwan M, Wielgoma B, Sobala W, Piskunowicz M, Radwan P, Bochenek M, Hanke W (2015) The effects of environmental exposure to pyrethroids and DNA damage in human sperm. Syst Biol Reprod Med 61(1):37–43.https://doi.org/10.3109/19396368. 2014.981886

Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehninger S (1988) Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 49(1):112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0015-0282(16)59660-5

Kumar V, Balomajumder C, Roy P (2008) Disruption of lh-induced tes-tosterone biosynthesis in testicular leydig cells by triclosan: probable mechanism of action. Toxicology 250(2-3):124–131.https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tox.2008.06.012

Kumar V, Chakraborty A, Kural MR, Roy P (2009) Alteration of testic-ular steroidogenesis and histopathology of reproductive system in male rats treated with triclosan. Reprod Toxicol 27(2):177–185.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.12.002

Lan Z, Hyung Kim T, Shun Bi K, Hui Chen X, Sik Kim H (2015) Triclosan exhibits a tendency to accumulate in the epididymis and shows sperm toxicity in male sprague-dawley rats. Environ Toxicol 30(1):83–91.https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.21897

Lassen TH, Frederiksen H, Jensen TK, Petersen H, Main KM, Skakkebaek NE, Jørgensen N, Kranich SK, Andersson AM (2013) Temporal variability in urinary excretion of bisphenol A and seven other phenols in spot, morning, and 24-h urine samples. Environ Res 126:164–170.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2013.07.001

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2009)

https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/Search/nhanes09_10.aspx

Pollack AZ, Perkins NJ, Sjaarda L, Mumford SL, Kannan K, Philippat C, Wactawski-Wende J, Schisterman EF (2016) Variability and expo-sure classification of urinary phenol and paraben metabolite

concentrations in reproductive-aged women. Environ Res 151: 513–520.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.08.016

R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical com-puting. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URLhttp://www.R-project.org/

Radwan M, Jurewicz J, Wielgomas B, Piskunowicz M, Sobala W, Radwan P, Jakubowski L, Hawuła W, Hanke W (2015) The associ-ation between environmental exposure to pyrethroids and sperm aneuploidy. Chemosphere 128:42–48.https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chemosphere.2014.12.077

Rodricks JV, Swenberg JA, Borzelleca JF, Maronpot RR, Shipp AM (2010) Triclosan: a critical review of the experimental data and development of margins of safety for consumer products. Crit Rev Toxicol 40(5): 422–484.https://doi.org/10.3109/10408441003667514

Sandborgh-Englund G, Adolfsson-Erici M, Odham G, Ekstrand J (2006) Pharmacokinetics of triclosan following oral ingestion in humans. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 69:1861–1873

Wang C-F, Tian Y (2015) Reproductive endocrine-disrupting effects of triclosan: population exposure, present evidence and potential mech-anisms. Environ Pollut 206:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envpol.2015.07.001

Witorsch RJ (2014) Critical analysis of endocrine disruptive activity of triclosan and its relevance to human exposure through the use of personal care products. Crit Rev Toxicol 44(6):535–555.https://doi. org/10.3109/10408444.2014.910754

World Health Organization (2010) WHO Laboratory manual for the ex-amination of human semen, 5th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Zhou W, Zhang H, Tong C, Xie C, Fan G, Zhao S, Yu X, Tian Y, Zhang J (2016) Environmental exposure to triclosan and semen quality. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(2):224