Delft University of Technology
Natrarchaeobius chitinivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., and Natrarchaeobius halalkaliphilus sp.
nov., alkaliphilic, chitin-utilizing haloarchaea from hypersaline alkaline lakes
Sorokin, Dimitry Y.; Elcheninov, Alexander G.; Toshchakov, Stepan V.; Bale, Nicole J.; Sinninghe Damsté,
Jaap S.; Khijniak, Tatiana V.; Kublanov, Ilya V.
DOI
10.1016/j.syapm.2019.01.001
Publication date
2019
Document Version
Final published version
Published in
Systematic and Applied Microbiology
Citation (APA)
Sorokin, D. Y., Elcheninov, A. G., Toshchakov, S. V., Bale, N. J., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., Khijniak, T. V., &
Kublanov, I. V. (2019). Natrarchaeobius chitinivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., and Natrarchaeobius
halalkaliphilus sp. nov., alkaliphilic, chitin-utilizing haloarchaea from hypersaline alkaline lakes. Systematic
and Applied Microbiology, 42(3), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2019.01.001
Important note
To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable).
Please check the document version above.
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy
Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology.
SystematicandAppliedMicrobiology42(2019)309–318
ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Systematic
and
Applied
Microbiology
j o ur na l h o me pa g e :h t t p : / / w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / s y a p m
Natrarchaeobius
chitinivorans
gen.
nov.,
sp.
nov.,
and
Natrarchaeobius
halalkaliphilus
sp.
nov.,
alkaliphilic,
chitin-utilizing
haloarchaea
from
hypersaline
alkaline
lakes
夽
Dimitry
Y.
Sorokin
a,b,∗,
Alexander
G.
Elcheninov
a,
Stepan
V.
Toshchakov
a,
Nicole
J.
Bale
c,
Jaap
S.
Sinninghe
Damsté
c,d,
Tatiana
V.
Khijniak
a,
Ilya
V.
Kublanov
aaWinogradskyInstituteofMicrobiology,ResearchCentreofBiotechnology,RussianAcademyofSciences,Moscow,Russia bDepartmentofBiotechnology,TUDelft,TheNetherlands
cDepartmentofMarineMicrobiologyandBiogeochemistry,NIOZNetherlandsInstituteforSeaResearch,TheNetherlands dDepartmentofEarthSciences—Geochemistry,FacultyofGeosciences,UtrechtUniversity,Utrecht,TheNetherlands
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:Received23October2018 Receivedinrevisedform 30December2018 Accepted2January2019 Keywords: Sodalakes Natronoarchaea Chitin Chitinase Natrialbaceae Natrarchaeobius
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
TwogroupsofalkaliphilichaloarchaeafromhypersalinealkalinelakesinCentralAsia,EgyptandNorth Americawereenrichedandisolatedinpurecultureusingchitinasgrowthsubstrate.Thesecultures, termedAArcht,weredividedintotwogroups:group1whichincludeselevenisolatesfromhighly alka-linesodalakesandgroup2whichcontainsasingleisolateobtainedfromthealkalinehypersalineSearles Lake.Thecoloniesofchitin-utilizingnatronoarchaeawerered-pigmentedandsurroundedbylargezones ofchitinhydrolysis.Thefreecellsofbothgroupsweremostlyflatnonmotilerods,whilethecellsthat attachedtochitinorformedcoloniesonchitinplatesweremostlycoccoid.Theisolatesareobligate aer-obicsaccharolyticarchaeautilizingchitinandchitosane(lessactively)astheonlysugarpolymersas wellasafewhexosesastheircarbonandenergysource.Bothgroupsareextremelyhalophilic,growing optimallyat3.5–4MtotalNa+,buttheydifferintheirpHprofiles:themaingroup1isolatesare
obli-gatelyalkaliphilic,whilethesinglegroup2strain(AArcht-SlT)isalkalitolerant.Thecorearchaeallipidsin
bothgroupsaredominatedbyC20–C20andC20–C25dialkylglycerolethers(DGE)inapproximatelyequal
proportion.Phylogeneticanalysisindicatedthattheisolatesformanindependentgenus-levellineage withinthefamilyNatrialbaceaewith3species-levelsubgroups.Theavailablegenomesoftheclosest cul-turedrelativesoftheAArchtstrains,belongingtothegeneraNatrialbaandHalopiger,donotencodeany chitinase-relatedgenes.Onthebasisoftheiruniquephenotypicpropertiesanddistinctphylogeny,we suggestthattheobligatealkaliphilicAArchtisolates(group1)withanidenticalphenotypeareclassified intoanewgenusandspeciesNatrarchaeobiuschitinivoransgen.nov.,sp.nov.,withstrainAArcht4Tasthe
typestrain(JCM32476T=UNIQEMU966T),whilethefacultativelyalkaliphilicstrainAArcht-SlT(group
2)—asanewspeciesNatrarchaeobiushalalkaliphilussp.nov.(JCM32477T=UNIQEMU969T).
©2019TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierGmbH.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
Extremely halophilic euryarchaea form a dominant group withinthe prokaryotic microbial communities in various types
Abbreviations: DGE,dialkylglycerolether;MGE,monoalkylglycerolether; PG,phosphatidylglycerol;PGP-Me,phosphatidylglycerophosphatemethylester;PE, phosphatidylethanolamine;PGP,phosphatidylglycerophosphate.
夽 ThewholegenomeshotgunprojectsofstrainsAArcht4T,AArcht7andAArcht-SlT
havebeendepositedatDDBJ/ENA/GenBankundertheaccessionsSAMN10160502, SAMN10160503andSAMN10160504,respectively.
∗ Correspondingauthorat:WinogradskyInstituteofMicrobiology,Research Cen-treofBiotechnology,RussianAcademyofSciences,Moscow,Russia.
E-mailaddresses:soroc@inmi.ru,d.sorokin@tudelft.nl(D.Y.Sorokin).
of salt-saturatedterrestrial brines,such asathalassic lakes and seasolarsalterns.Incontrasttootherclasses ofEuryarchaeota, theyaremostlyaerobicheterotrophs,whichutilizesolubleorganic substrates,suchassugars,organicacidsandcomplexrichamino acid-containing substrates such as peptons, and yeast extract
[2,4,12,26–27,29].Untilrecentlythepolymer-degradingpotential of cultivated haloarchaeal species was limited to a few exam-ples,suchasstarch, proteinsandoliveoil[1,3,10,25,34].Asfor the recalcitrant insolublepolysaccharides, such as cellulose or chitin,almost nothinghasbeen describedtodate inthe litera-ture.However,duetotheincreasedavailabilityofmultiplegenome sequencingdataoverthepastfewyears,ithasbecomeapparent thatsomeofthehaloarchaeabelongingtothegeneraHaloarcula, Halobacterium,Halalkalicoccus,Haloferax,Halorhabdus,Halovivax,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2019.01.001
0723-2020/©2019TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierGmbH.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ 4.0/).
Halostagnicola, Haloterrigena-Natrinema and Natronococcus may possessthepotentialtohydrolyzesugarpolymers,including cel-luloseandhemicelluloses(GHfamily3,5and9).Thisinference wasrecentlyvalidatedbyphenotypicstudiesofsomeoftheafore mentionedgenera[20–22,36].Indeed,thechitinasegenes(GH fam-ily18)arepresent inthegenomesofthegeneraHalobacterium, Halomicrobium,Natrinema,HaloferaxandSalinarchaeum. Further-more,recentphysiologicalstudiesofpurecultures belongingto thesegenerahaveconfirmedtheirabilitytousechitinasgrowth substrate[37,14–15,8,9,24],substantiallychangingprevious con-ceptsoftheecologicalroleoftheseextremophilicarchaea.
Inourrecentworkwewereabletoenrichandisolateinpure culture for the first time a number of alkaliphilic haloarchaea (i.e.natronoarchaea)fromhypersalinealkalinelakeswhichutilize chitinastheirgrowthsubstrate[37].Theseincludedtwo phyloge-neticgroups:adominantgroupwithmultipleisolatesfromsoda lakesandasinglestrainfromalessalkalineSearlesLake.Inthis paperwedescribethephenotypicandphylogeneticpropertiesof thesetwogroupsofchitin-utilizingnatronoarchaeaandproposeto classifythemintotwospecieswithinanewgenusNatrarchaeobius.
Materialandmethods
Samples
Toenrichforchitin-utilizingnatronoarchaea,surfacesediments andnear-bottombrinesfromthefollowingalkalinehypersaline inlandlakeswereused:sodalakesinKulundaSteppe(Altairegion, Russia,2011–2012);sodalakesinnorth-easternMongolia(1999) andInnerMongolia(2013);sodaOwensLakeinCalifornia(2008); alkalinelakesinWadialNatrun(Egypt,2000)andalkalineSearles LakeinCalifornia(2005).Thechemicalparametersofthebrines andtheirlocationcoordinatesaregiveninapreviouspublication
[37].Beforeuse,thesedimentslurrieswerehomogenizedby vor-texingandthecoarsesedimentfractionwasremovedbya low speedcentrifugation,whiletheremainingcolloidalfractionwas usedasinoculum(2%v/v).Thebrineswereuseddirectly(10%v/v).
Cultivationandphenotypictests
Thecompositionofthebasicmineralmediumandthedetails ofenrichmentand cultivationofchitin-utilizingnatronoarchaea are described in a previouspublication [37].Briefly, two basic media,onecontaining4MNaClatpH7andanotherone contain-ing4MNaascarbonatesatpH10weremixed1:1,resultingina Cl/carbonatebasicmineralmediumwithapH9.5.Mixingthese twobasesindifferentproportionsalsoallowedforthe investiga-tionofthegrowthpHrangeintherange8–9.5.ForthelowerpH (6–8)theNaClbasemediumbufferingcapacitywasincreasedby adding4gl−1ofHEPES(higherconcentrationsinhibitedgrowth) and,insteadofthealkalinebase,thepHwasadjustedbyadding 1Mfilter-sterilized sodium bicarbonatewith pH8. For thepH above9.5,1partoftheNaClbasewasmixedwiththreepartsof thesodabaseandwasfurthertitratedusing4MNaOHtoreach thepHvalues upto11. Itmustbestressedthatduringgrowth oncarbohydrates,despitethehighbufferingcapacityofthe car-bonatebasemedium,thepHshiftedsignificantlyattheextremes (below8.5andabove10).Wenotethereforethatitisessential, undersuchconditions,tomonitortheactualpHwhiletestingthe influenceofpHongrowth.Forthesaltprofiling,twomedia, con-taininganequalNamolarratioofNaClandsodiumcarbonateatpH 9weremixedindifferentproportionstocreatearangeofsalinities from1to5Mwithstepsof0.5MNa.Thetemperatureprofilewas testedwithintherange 20–60◦C(at5◦C increments).This pro-filewascarriedoutatpH8.5 (toavoidcelllysis atanextreme
alkalinerangeincombinationwithhightemperature),with4M totalNa+ whileN-acetylglucosamine wasusedasthesubstrate.
Thedetailsofthepreparationofthesolidmediumwithamorphous chitinaredescribedinourpreviouspublication[37].For anaero-bicgrowth,10ml portionsofliquid mediumatpH9.1–9.5(4M totalNa+and10mMN-acetylglucosamineascarbonandN-source)
weredispensedinto23mlsterileserumbottleswhichwereclosed withbutylrubberstoppersandmadeanoxicthroughthreecycles ofevacuation/flushingwithsterileargon.Theutilizationof inor-ganicN-sourceswastestedusingsucroseasasubstrate.Carbon substrateprofilingwasdoneforstrainsAArcht4T,AArcht7(atpH
9.5)andAArcht-SlT (atpH9)at4Mtotal Na+ usingammonium
as theN-source.Proteolytic and lipolytic activitieswere tested onsolid mediumwithcasein(clearanceafterfloodingwith10% TCA)andemulgatedoliveoil(directclearance),respectively. Cata-laseandoxidaseactivityweredetectedbycolonyassayusing3% H2O2and0.1%N,N,N,N-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine(TMPD)
hydrochloride,respectively. Analyses
Thephase contrastandepifluorescencemicroscopyand pho-tography were performed using the Zeiss Axioplan Imaging 2 microscope(Göttingen,Germany).Cellsabsorbedonchitinwere visualized using live-dead staining with SYTO9 (Invitrogen kit L7012).Fortheelectronmicroscopyofthinsections,thecellsof strainsAArcht4T and AArcht-SlT grown with amorphous chitin
werefixedin1%(w/v)OsO4containing3MNaClfor1weekat4◦C,
washedandresuspendedin3MNaCl,stainedovernightwith1% (w/v)uranylacetate,dehydratedinethanolseriesandembedded inEponresin.Afterthinsectioning,thepreparationswere post-stainedwith1%(w/v)leadcitrateandexaminedusingtheJEOL-100 TEM(Japan).
Thecoremembranelipidswereobtainedbyacidhydrolysis(5% HClinmethanolbyrefluxfor3h)ofthefreeze-driedcellsand sub-sequentanalysisbyHPLC-MSformembrane-spanninglipidsand archaeolderivativesaccordingtoRef.[40].Intactpolarlipidswere obtainedbyBlighDyerextractionoffreeze-driedcellsand subse-quentHPLC-MSanalysisasdescribedinRef.[35].
Respiratory quinones were recovered from wet biomass by three consecutive extractions with cold acetone for 1h on a magneticstirrer.Thecumulativeextractwasconcentratedby evap-orationandthequinonefractionwasseparatedfromcarotenoids by TLC (Sorbofil, Russia) in hexane-diethyl ether (85:15). The obtainedquinone band(Rf=0.52) was recovered by extraction withCCl4–CH3OH(1:1)andsubjectedtomass-spectroscopywith
chemical ionization at atmospheric pressure using quadrupol massspectrometerFinniganLCQAdvantageMAX(Germany)[7].
Phylogeneticanalysis
For strains AArcht4T,AArcht7 and AArcht-SlT the 16S rRNA
andrpoBgenenucleotidesequenceswereobtainedfromthedraft genomeassemblies,whilefortherestoftheAArchtstrainspartial 16SrRNAgenesequenceswerepreviouslyavailable[37].The phy-logeneticanalysiswasperformedinMega7package[18].The16S rRNAgenesequencesofalltypestrainsoftheNatrialbaceae fam-ilyandHalomarinaoriensisJCM16495(asanoutgroup)obtained fromtheGenbankwerealignedtogetherwiththesequencesof AArchtstrainsusing G-INS-imethodinMAFFT serverv.7[17]. ThephylogeneticanalysiswasperformedusingMaximum Like-lihood method and the General Time Reversible (GTR) model (G+I,4categories)[31].FortherpoB-basedphylogenetic analy-sis,thefull-lengthnucleotidesequencesofalltypestrainsfrom theNatrialbaceaeandHalomarinaoriensisJCM16495(asoutgroup) wereobtainedfromtheGenBankandIMGandalignedusingthe
D.Y.Sorokinetal./SystematicandAppliedMicrobiology42(2019)309–318 311
Table1
Natronarchaealstrainsisolatedfrombrinesandsurfacesedimentsofhypersalinealkalinelakeswithchitinassubstrate.
Strain Isolatedfrom: Phylogeneticgroup Culturecollectionsnumbers
Lake Area
AArcht1 Sodacrystallizer(2012) KulundaSteppe Group1 UNIQEMU967
AArcht5 Tanatar-1 Altai,Russia UNIQEMU968
AArcht6
Sodacrystallizer(2003) AArcht7
AArcht8 Bitter-3 AArcht-St StampLake AArcht3
Mixedbrine-sedimentsfrom6lakes WadiNatrun UNEQEMU966
AArcht4T Egypt JCM32476
AArcht-Mg Shar-Burdiin N–EMongolia
AArcht-Ow OwensLake California,USA
AArcht-Bj BadainJaran InnerMongolia
AArcht-SlT SearlesLake California,USA Group2 UNIQEMU969
JCM32477 Boldtextmeansthetypestrainsoftypespecies.
G-INS-imethodinMAFFTserverv.7.Aphylogenetictreewas
con-structedusingMaximumLikelihoodmethodwithGTRmodel(G+I,
4categories).For theconservedproteinsphylogeny,aminoacid
sequencesof33single-copyproteinsderivedfromtherespected
genespresentin49genomesofNatrialbaceaespecies
(Supplemen-taryTableS1), includingAArcht4T,AArcht7and AArcht-SlT and
NatronomonaspharaonisDSM2160asanoutgroup,wereobtained
fromIMG[6].The33setsofproteinsequenceswerealignedin MAFFTv.7usingL-INS-ialgorithm,thealignmentswere concate-natedusingFaBoxjoineralignment[39]andthephylogenetictree wasconstructedusingMaximumLikelihoodmethodandtheLG model(G+I,4categories)[20].
PairwiseANIcomparisonwasperformedusingpyanimodule v0.2.7[32]withMUMmer[19]andBLASTn+[5]asalignment meth-ods.TheDDHvaluesbetweenthethreegenome-sequencedAArcht strainsandthetypestrainsofNatrialbaceaewerecalculatedusing theGenome-to-GenomeDistanceCalculator2.1(GGDC)[23]with theBLAST+asalocalalignmenttool.
Resultsanddiscussion
Isolation,morphologyandchemotaxonomy
Overall,elevenstrainsofnatronoarchaeacapableofusingchitin (bothamorphousandcrystalline,originatedeitherfromcrabor shrimpshells)asthegrowthsubstratewerepurifiedfrom enrich-mentculturesinoculatedwithbrinesandsurfacesedimentsfrom hypersalinesodalakes(AArchtstrainsgroup1).Inaddition,asingle strainAArcht-SlT(group2)wasisolatedfromalessalkaline
hyper-salineSearlesLake(Table1).AllAArchtisolatesformedred-orange pigmentedcolonies witha largeclearancezonesof amorphous chitinaroundthem,allowingfortheirrecognitionamongst mul-tiplenon-chitinolyticnatronarchaealsatellites(Fig.1a,b).Growth inliquidculturewithchitinhadtwophases:theinitialphasewas characterizedbyanabsorptionofthecellsonchitin,resultinginthe aggregationofamorphouschitinparticlesinlargerconglomerates ortheformationofbiofilmsoncrystallinechitinparticles.During thisphase(aswellasinthecoloniesonplateswithamorphous chitin),thecellswereinthecoccoidform(Fig.1e,f).Inthesecond stageofmassivechitinhydrolysis,freecellsstartedtoaccumulate intheculturebrothandweremostlyintheformofnonmotileflat rods(Fig.1c,d).Thesametypeof“dimorphism”hasrecentlybeen observedinanothergroupofhydrolyticnatronoarchaeafromsoda lakes,Natronobiformacellulosivorans,whichutilizeinsoluble cellu-losesasasubstrate[36].Thinsectionelectronmicroscopyofstrains AArcht4T andAArcht-SlT revealedthepresenceofa thin
mono-layercellwall, typicalformostofthehaloarchaealspecies,and
alargenucleoid.Manyofthecellsexaminedcontained electron-transparentinclusionbodies,who,althoughtheirnaturewasnot investigated further,are speculatedtobeofeither polyhydrox-yalkanoateorglycogenorigin(Fig.1g,h).Therod-phasecellslyzed afterresuspensionin solutionscontainingless than1.5MNaCl, whilethecellsincoccoidstageweremoreresistanttohypoosmosis andonlystartedtolyzeindistilledwater.
The core membrane lipids in strains AArcht4T and
AArcht-SlT wererepresented bytwo dominant componentscommonly
found in haloarchaea: archaeol [C20–C20 dialkyl glycerol ether
(DGE)] and extended archaeol(C20–C25 DGE), approximatelyat
equalproportions.Inaddition,unsaturatedformsofbothC20–C20
DGEandC20–C25DGEweredetectedasminorcomponents.The
C25–C20DGEspecieswasnotdetected.Theintactpolarlipidsin
both strains were dominated by phosphatidylglycerophosphate methylester(PGP-Me)andphosphatidylglycerol(PG),whichare bothcommoninhaloarchaealspecies,includingmembersofthe familyNatrialbaceae.Minoramountsofphosphatidylethanolamine (PE) weredetectedinAArcht4T,while minoramountsof
phos-phatidylglycerophosphate(PGP)weredetectedinbothAArcht4T
and AArcht-SlT. The glyco- and sulfo-lipids were not detected
(Suppl.Fig.S1).
The respiratory quinone analysis in the two type strains (AArcht4T and AArcht-SlT) representing the two groups of
natronarchaealchitinolyticsrevealedinboththepresenceofa sin-glemenaquinonspecies,identifiedasMK-8:0(Suppl.Fig.S2),which iscommonlydetectedinhaloarchaea[11].
Phylogeneticanalysis
BLASTanalysisofthe16SrRNAgenesequenceofthetwelve AArchtstrainsshowedthatallofthemfellintothefamily Natrial-baceaeandthattheyformedtwosubgroupsdividedbya3-species clusterofthegenusNatrialba(Fig.2a).Group1includedten iso-latesfromsodalakeswithahighsequenceidentity(above98%), whilegroup2containedonlystrainsAArcht7andAArcht-SlT.
How-ever,the16SrRNAgene-basedphylogenyseemedtobeunreliable becausethebootstrapvaluesinthekeynodeswereverylowand thusmostofthebrancheswerenotresolved.Therefore,to fur-therclarifytheAArchtphylogeny,twoadditionalanalyseswere performedforthegenome-sequencedstrainsAArcht4T,AArcht7
and AArcht-SlT togetherwith the Natrialbaceae representatives
basedontheRNApolymeraseB-subunit(rpoB)genenucleotide sequences(Fig.2b)andontheconcatenatedalignmentof33 single-copyconservedproteins(Fig.2c).Insharpcontrasttotheresultsof the16SrRNAgene-basedphylogeny,thelatterapproacheswere coherent and reliably showed that the AArcht strainsform an
Fig.1.MorphologyofstrainsAArcht4T(a,c,e,g)andAArcht-SlT(b,d,f,h)growingat4MtotalNa+,pH9.2and37◦Cwithchitin.(a–b)coloniesonamorphouschitin
platesforminghydrolysiszones;(c–d)phasecontrastmicrophotographofcellsgrownwithamorphouschitininliquidculture;(e)epifluorescenceimageofcoccoidcellsof AArcht4Tformingbiofilmoncrystallinechitinfiber;(f)phasecontrastmicrophotographofcoccoidcellsofAArcht-SlTfromacolonyonamorphouschitinplate;(d)electron
microscopyofthinsectionsofcellsgrownwithamorphouschitin.CW,cellwall;CPM,cytoplasmicmembrane;N,nucleoid,Stg,storagegranule.
independentmonophyleticlineagewithintheNatrialbacea,with AArcht4T and7clusteringtogetherandAArcht-SlT —asa
sepa-ratebranch.ItalsodemonstratedthatthegenusNatrialbamost probablyconsistsoftwodifferentgeneraandneedsataxonomic revision.
Further genomic comparison of the 3 genome-sequenced AArchtstrains4,7andSlbetweeneachotherandwiththe mem-bersofNatrialbaceawereperformedusingtwostandardindexes, ANIandDDH.TwovariationsoftheANIcalculationshowedthat thesimilaritylevelbetweentheAArchtstrainsandthemembers of thefamily is higher (but only marginally) than theaverage intragenuslevel(0.86versus0.85)(SupplementaryTablesS2and S3). Likewise,the DDH analysis showedlow values of similar-ity of the 3 AArcht strains (below 24%) with members of the Natrialbacea(Supplementary TableS4)and betweeneach other (below26%).
Growthphysiology
The AArcht isolates are obligately aerobic saccharolytic natronoarchaea(growthbyfermentation,nitrate,DMSOand sul-fur reduction with N-acetylglucosamine as substrate was not observed).Allisolatesgrewwithchitinand(lessactively)with chi-tosaneintheiramorphousorcrystallineforms.Genomeanalysis of3representativestrainsshowedapresenceof3–7 endochiti-nasegenesoftheGH18familyconsistentwiththephysiologyof
theAArchtisolates(Table2).Incontrast,noneofthosegeneswere foundintheavailable genomesfromtherelated generawithin theNatrialbaceaefamilyexcepttheneutrophilicSalinarchaeum,for whichthepotentialtoutilizechitinforgrowthhasalsorecently beendemonstrated[24,37].WetestedtypestrainsofNatrialba asi-aticaandHalopigerxanaduensisfortheirabilitytogrowwithchitin andchitosaneandtheresultswerenegative.BothAArchtgroups alsoutilizedchitinandchitosanemonomers(N-acetylglucosamine and glucosamine, respectively)along witha few other hexoses and glycerol (Table 2). No growth was detected with the fol-lowingpolysaccharides:amorphouscellulose,CMC,various beta-andalpha-glycans, beta-mannan,beta-galactan,betaglyco- and galactomannans, pectin,alginate.The solublesugar compounds whichtestednegativeincludedglucose,galactose,mannose, arabi-nose,rhamnose,glucuronicandgalacturonicacids,xylose,ribose, maltose,lactose,trehalose,melibioze,sorbitolandmannitol.No growthwasdetectedwithorganicacids(C2–C8 fattyacids,
lac-tate,pyruvate,malate,succinate,fumarate)norcomplexorganic aminoacidsubstrates,suchasvariouspeptonsandyeastextract. Lipase and protease were negative. Anaerobic growth with N-acetylglucosaminewasnotobservedeitherbyfermentation,orin thepresence ofelectronacceptors,includingnitrate/nitrite, sul-fur,thiosulfate,DMSO,fumarate,(10mMeach),arsenate,selenate (5mMeach).UtilizationofN-sourceswastestedforthreestrains: AArcht4T,AArcht7andAArcht-SlTusingsucroseasthecarbonand
D.Y.Sorokinetal./SystematicandAppliedMicrobiology42(2019)309–318 313
Fig.2. PhylogenyoftheAArchtstrains.
(a)MaximumLikelihood16SrRNAgene-basedphylogenetictreeofAArchtstrains(inbold)withinthefamilyNatrialbaceaewithHalomarinaoriensisasanoutgroup.Branch lengthscorrespondtothenumberofsubstitutionspersitewithcorrections,associatedwiththemodel(GTR,G+I,4categories).Allpositionswithlessthan95%sitecoverage wereeliminated.Totally1359positionswereusedinthealignmentof93sequences(SupplementaryTableS5a).Numbersatnodesindicatebootstrapvaluesof1000 repetitions.
(b)MaximumLikelihoodphylogenetictreebasedonrpoBgenesequencesofNatrialbaceaerepresentativestogetherwithAArcht4T,AArcht7andAArcht-SlTstrains(in
bold)withHalomarinaoriensisasanoutgroup.Branchlengthscorrespondtothenumberofsubstitutionspersitewithcorrections,associatedwiththemodel(GTR,G+I,4 categories).Allpositionswithlessthan95%sitecoveragewereeliminated.Totally1830positionswereusedinthealignmentof64sequences(SupplementaryTableS5b). Numbersatnodesindicatebootstrapvaluesof1000repetitions.GeneaccessionnumbersobtainedfromtheIMGdatabaseareunderlined.
(c)MaximumLikelihoodtreebasedonconcatenatedaminoacidsequencesof33single-copyconservedproteinsshowingpositionoftheAArchtlineage(inbold)within theNatrialbaceaefamily.Natronomonaspharaoniswasusedasanoutgroup.Branchlengthscorrespondtothenumberofsubstitutionspersitewithcorrections,associated withthemodel(LG,G+I,4categories).Allpositionswithlessthan95%sitecoveragewereeliminated.Totally6342positionswereusedinthealignmentof49aminoacid sequences.Numbersatnodesindicatebootstrapvaluesof1000repetitions.GeneaccessionnumbersobtainedfromtheIMGdatabaseareunderlined.
Table2
Comparativepropertyofchitin-utilizingnatronoarchaeawiththerelatedgenerafromthefamilyNatrialbaceaecontainingalkaliphilicspecies.Cumulativecomparativedata aretakenfromRef.[30].Numberofspeciesareindicatedinparenthesis.
Property “Natrarchaeobius” (2) Natrialba(6) Natronolimnobius (2) Natronobacterium (2)
Natronorubrum(6) Natronococcus(4) “Natronobiforma” (1)
Cellmorphology Dimorphic Dimorphic Pleomorphic,flat Rodsorcocci Pleomorphic,flat Cocciinclusters Dimorphic
Motility − V − − V − +
Pigmentation Red-orange Nopigmentor red-orange
Red-orange Red Pink-red Pink,red,orangeor brown Red Celllyzisin distilledwater + + + + + − + Growthwith chitin + −(G) −a −(G) -(G) −(G) − Growthwith insoluble cellulose − −(G) Va −(G) -(G) −(G) + Proteolysis − V V V V V − Starchhydrolysis − V Va − − V − Anaerobic growth withnitrate − nd − − − − − Minimalsalinity MNa+ 3.0 1.6 Above2.5 1.7 1.7 1.5 2.5 pHtype Facultativeor obligatealkaliphilic Facultative alkaliphilicor alkalitolerant
Obligatealkaiphilic Obligatealkaiphilic Facultativeor obligatealkaliphilic alkalitolerant
Obligatealkaiphilic Obligate alkaiphilic Temperature
max.
55◦C(atpH8) 50-60 54 40 50–55◦C 50–55 53(atpH8.5)
Majorcorelipids C20–C20,C20–C25 C20–C20,
C20–C25 C20–C20,C20–C25 C20–C20,C20–C25 C20–C20,C20–C25 C20–C20,C20–C25 C20–C20, C20–C25 Intactmembrane phospholipids PGP-Me,PG (minor):PE,PGP
PGP-Me,PG PGP-Me,PG PGP-Me,PG PGP-Me,PG PGP-Me,PG PGP-Me,PG,
PGP
Glycolipids − S2-DGD(in
alkalitolerant species)
− V(unidentified) TGA-1(ina
neutrophilic species) − GL-PG,2GL G+C,mol% 61.9–62.3 61.5–64.3 59–64 62.5–65.9 59.9–63.3 62.1–64.0 65.4–65.5 Habitat Hypersaline alkalinelakes
Sodaandsalt lakes
Sodalake Sodalakes Sodaandsaltlakes Sodalakes Sodalakes V,variablepropertyindifferentspecoes;nd,notdetrmined;(G)—genomicdata.
PGP-Me,phosphatidylglycerophosphatemethylester;PG,phosphatidylglycerols;PE,phosphatidylethanolamine;PGP,phosphatidylglycerophosphate;GL-PG, phosphatidyl-glycose;2GL—diglycosyl;S2-DGD—disulfatedmannosylglucosyldiether;TGA-1—triglycosylarchaeol.
Boldtextmeanstheorganismsdescribedinthisarticleincontrasttothereferenceorganismsusedforcomparison.
aOurdata(NatronolimnobiusinnermongolicusandNl.baerhaensecannotgrowonchitin,butthelattercanweaklygrowwithinsolublecelluloseandgrowwellwithxylane
andstarch).
whileurea,nitrateandnitritedidnotsupportgrowthinseveral progressivepassages.
Antibioticresistancewastestedfor AArcht4T (atpH9.5)and
AArcht-SlT (atpH9)inliquid culturewiththechitin monomer
assubstrate.Bothwereresistantto100gml−1 of penicillinG, ampicilline,kanamycin,streptomycin,gentamicin, erythromycin andvancomicin.Rifampicinandchloramphenicolinhibitedgrowth ofAArcht4Tat100g/ml,whileAArcht-SlTdidnotgrowalreadyat
50g/mlofthosetwoantibiotics.
ThesaltprofileforgrowthintherepresentativestrainsAArcht4T
andAArcht-SlTwasinvestigatedusingN-acetylglucosamineasthe
substrateatpH9.Bothstrainsgrewwithina narrowsalt range from3to5MtotalNa+withanoptimumat3.5–4M,which
clas-sifiesthemasextremehalophiles.InrespecttothepHrangefor growth(tested at4MNa+), thetwogroupswereclearly
differ-ent.FivetestedsodalakeAArchtisolates(1,3,4T,5,7)startedto
growonlyatpHaboveneutralwithanoptimumat9.1–9.3and maximum(final)pHupto9.9–10,thusbelongingtotheobligate alkaliphilictype.Incontrast,strainAArcht-SlTshowedgrowthatpH
aslowas6.5,althoughitstillgrewoptimallyatpH8–8.5andup to9.5,characterizingitasafacultativealkaliphile.Thedifference inhighpHresponsebetweenthetwo AArchtgroupscorrelated withtheirdifferentCl−dependence:theAArchtstrainsfromgroup 1demandedatleast1MCl−,while AArcht-SlT didnotgrowat
Cl− concentrationsbelow 2.5M.Strainsfrombothgroups grew equallywellatMg2+concentrations from1to5mM (athigher
concentrationmagnesiumstartedtoprecipitateathighpH).Both
groupsshowedmesophilictemperatureprofilestypicalformany haloarchaealspecieswithasomewhatelevatedmaximumupto50 (AArcht4T)and55◦C(AArcht-SlT)whichdecreasedwithincreasing
pH.Theprobablereasonforthelatterisproteininstabilityatahigh temperature-highpHcombination.
TheNatrialbaceaefamily (theonlyfamily in theorder Natri-albales) currentlyincludestwelverecognizedgenera[30] and a recentlydescribedgenus“Natronobiforma”[36].Mostofthe gen-erainthisfamilyincludealkaliphilicoralkalitolerantspecies[30]. However, as described above, doubt exists asto the reliability of reported maximum pH values as, in most cases, the actual pHchangesduringgrowthwerenottested.Mostprobably,only thosespeciesthatoriginatedfromsodalakesaretruealkaliphiles, including species from the genera Natrialba, Natronobacterium, Natronococcus,Natronolimnobius,Natronorubrumand “Natronob-iforma”.Hence, Table2providesphenotypiccomparison ofthe AArchtisolateswiththosegeneraofthefamilythatcontainmainly speciesoriginatingfromalkaline habitats.Themain phenotypic propertyofthenovelgroupwhichdiscriminatesitfromtheother natronoarchaeaintheNatrialbaceaeistheabilitytoutilizechitin asthegrowthsubstrate.TheonlyothergenusintheNatrialbaceae withsuchcapabilityisthegenusSalinarchaeum[24,37]whichisa neutrophilichalophile.AnotherprominentdifferenceoftheAArcht strainsisthehighvaluesoftheirminimalsaltconcentrationfor growth(3MNa+).Inrespecttocellmorphology,thenovelgroup
sharesatendencyfordimorphism(rodsand cocci)withgenera Natrialbaand“Natronobiforma”.Inrespecttothelipid
composi-D.Y.Sorokinetal./SystematicandAppliedMicrobiology42(2019)309–318 315
Table3
Comparativepropertyofchitin-utilizingnatronoarchaeawiththerelatedspeciesfromthefamilyNatrialbaceae:1,Natrialbaasiatica[16];2,Natrialbachahannaoensis[41];
3,Halopigerxanaduensis[13].
Property Group1(11strains) AArcht-SlT 1 2 3
Cellmorphology Non-motileflatrodsin freestate;coccoidsin chitin-attachedstate
Pleomorphic,fromrods tococcoids,non-motile
Rods,motile Rods,non-motile Dimorphic
Pigmentation Red–orange Orange No Red Red
Growthsubstrates: Sugarpolymers
Chitin,chitosane + + −d −d
Otherglycans − − − starch
Sugars Glucosamine, N-acetylglucosamine, sucrose,maltose, trehalose,melizitose, cellobiose,glycerol Glucosamine, N-acetylglucosamine, sucrose,maltose, trehalose,melizitose, fructose,glycerol −d −d Glucose,galactose, xylose − − Glucose,fructose, maltose −d −d Glucose,arabinose, xylose Proteins,peptides − − + + + Numberofchitinase GH18genesinthe genome AArcht4(5) 3 0 0 0 AArcht7(7)
Anaerobicgrowth − − − Nitratetonitrite
reduction
+(denitrification)
Catalase/oxidase +/+ +/+ +/+ +/+ +/+
Salinityrange(opt.)M Na+
3.0–5.0(4.0) 3.0–5.0(3.5) 2.0–5.0(4.0) 1.6–5.2(2.5) 2.5–5.0(4.3)
pHrange(opt.) 7.0–10.0(9.1–9.3) 6.5–9.5(8.0–8.5) 6.0–8.0(6.6–7.0) 8.5–10.5a(9.0) 6–11b(7.5–8.0)
Temperature(◦C)c 20–50(opt.43) 25–55(opt.45) max.50(30–40) 20–55(50) 28–45(37)
Corelipids C20–C20,C20–C25
(dominant)1-and 2-C20MGEand2-C25
MGE(minor)
C20–C20,C20–C25 C20–C20,C20–C25 C20–C20,C20–C25 C20–C20,C20–C25
Intactmembranepolar lipids
(major):PGP-Me,PG (major):PGP-Me,PG PGP-Me,PG, S2-DGD
PGP-Me,PG PGP-Me,S2-DGD
(minor):PE,PGP (minor):PGP G+C,mol% AArcht4T:61.9
(genome)
61.1(genome) 62.4(genome) 64.3(Tm) 65.2(genome)
AArcht7:62.3(genome)
Habitat Hypersalinealkaline
lakesinCentralAsia andAfrica
Hypersalinealkaline SearlesLake (California)
Seasaltevaporites Sodalakes,InnerMongolia
Phospholipids:(PG)phosphatidylglycerol,(PGP-Me)phosphatidylglycerophosphatemethylester,(PE)phosphatidylethanolamine,PGP(phosphatidylglycerophosphate);(S2
-DGD)disulfatedmannosylglucosyldiether.
Boldtextmeanstheorganismsdescribedinthisarticleincontrasttothereferenceorganismsusedforcomparison.
aFinalpHisnotmeasuredthereforethemax.growthpHisnotvalidated.
bFinalpHisnotmeasured,thereforethemax.growthpHisnotvalidated,especiallytakingintoaccountlowpHoptimum. c TestedatpH8.5.
d Testedinthiswork.
tionallcomparedgeneraaresimilarintheirmajorcoreandintact phospholipids.Thenovelgrouphastwoadditionalminor compo-nents,bothinthecoreandintactlipids,butitispossiblethatthese werenotdetectedinothergenerabecauseoflesssensitiveanalysis (TLCversusHPLC).
Further,moredetailed phenotypiccomparisonof the chitin-utilizing natronoarchaea with related species of the genera NatrialbaandHalopigerisgivenin(Table3).
TheAArchtisolatesrepresentthefirstexampleofalkaliphilic haloarchaeaenrichedandisolatedfromhypersalinealkalinelakes withchitinastheirgrowthsubstrate.Theyarehighlyspecialized intheutilizationofchitin(whichisreflected inthepresenceof multiplechitinasegenesintheirgenomes)andcanonlyutilizea fewsolublesugarsforgrowth.Theirpresenceinhypersaline alka-line(soda)lakesonthreedifferentcontinentsindicatethatchitin mustbeabundantinsuchhabitats—afactnotwellrecognized todate. A mass developmentof chitin-producingbrine shrimp ArtemiamonicainsodalakeMono(California)istheonlyexampleof chitin-producinginvertebratesreportedintheliterature[8]. How-ever,theauthorshavenoticedtheirpresenceenmasseinhighly alkalinesodalakesoftheKulundaSteppe(unpublished,Suppl.Fig. S3a).Anothermassivesourceofchitininsodalakescouldbefrom thesodaflylarvasEphydrahians[38]whichwasalsooftenobserved
bytheauthorsonthelittoralof theKulunda Steppesodalakes (Suppl.Fig.S3b,c).
OneofthepeculiaritiesoftheAArchtstrainsdescribedhere, thatapparentlydrawsattention,istheineffectivenessofthe16S rRNAgene,whichnormallyprovidesreliablephylogenetic recon-structions.Thismarkerhasbeen,sofar,anindisputablebasisfor phylogeneticreconstructions,although,forhaloarchaeain particu-lar,severalproblematicexamplesofmultipledissimilatorycopies of this gene have been documented [28]. This inability to use rrngenesforphylogeneticreconstructionscouldbeovercomeby involvingphylogenomicanalysisofconservedsingle-copyprotein markers[32].InthecaseoftheAArchtstrains,thisapproachgave much moreconsistentresultsindicatinga monophyletic genus-levelgroupwiththreespecies-levelsubgroups:tenisolatesfrom hypersalinesodalakes,AArcht7fromasodacrystallizingpoolin KulundaSteppeandAArcht-SlTfromthemoderatelyalkaline
Sear-lesLake.However,onthephenotypiclevel,strainAArcht7cannot bedistinguishedfromthemainsodalakegroup,incontrasttostrain AArcht-SlT,whichclearlydifferentiatedbyitslowerpHoptimum
andmaximumandmuchhigherchloridedependence.
Inconclusion,takingintoaccountuniquephenotypicproperties andresultsofphylogenomicanalysis,weproposetoclassifythe majorsodalakegroup1(11isolates)inanewgenusandspecies
Table4
NatrarchaeobiuschitinivoransandNatrarchaeobiushaloalkaliphilus:protologue.
Parameter Genus:Natrarchaeobiusgen.nov. Species:Natrarchaeobius chitinivoranssp.nov.
Species:Natrarchaeobius halalkaliphilussp.nov.
Datecreated 2018-09-24 2018-09-24 2018-09-24
Taxonnumber(TXNR) GA00091 Author(AUTE) DimitryY.Sorokin
Speciesname(SPNA) Natrarchaeobiuschitinivorans Natrarchaeobiushalalkaliphilus
Genusname(GENA) Natrarchaeobius
Specificepithet(SPEP) – chitinivorans haloalkaliphilus
Speciesstatus(SPST) – sp.nov. sp.nov.
Etymology(GETY/SPTY) Natr.ar.chae.o’bi.us[N.L.n.natron (arbitrarilyderivedfromArabicn. natrunornatron)soda,sodium carbonate;N.L.pref. natr-pertainingtosoda;Gr.adj.archaios ancient;Gr.masc.n.bioslife;N.L. masc.n.Natrarchaeobius, soda-philicarchaeon]
chitinivorans[chi.ti.ni.vo’ransN.L. neut.n.chitinumchitin;L.pres. part.voransdevouring;N.L.part. adj.chitinivoranschitindevouring]
halalkaliphilus[hal.al.ka.li.phi’lus Gr.n.halshalossalt;N.L.n.alkali sodaash(fromArabical-qalyithe ashesofsaltwort);N.L.adj.philus (fromGr.adj.philos-ê−on)friend, loving;N.L.masc.adj.
halalkaliphilussaltand alkali-loving].
Authors(AUT) DimitryY.Sorokin,AlexanderG.Elcheninov,StepanV.Toshchakov,NicoleJ.Bale,JaapS.SinningheDamsté,TatianaV. Khijniak,IlyaV.Kublanov
Title(TITL) Natrarchaeobiuschitinivoransgen.nov.,sp.nov.,andNatrarchaeobiushalalkaliphilussp.nov.,alkaliphilic, chitin-utilizinghaloarchaeafromhypersalinealkalinelakes
Journal(JOUR) SystematicandAppliedMicrobiology Correspondingauthor(COAU). DimitryY.Sorokin
E-mailofcorrespondingauthor(EMAU) d.sorokin@tudelft;soroc@inmi.ru
Designationofthetypestrain(TYPE) – AArcht4 AArcht-Sl
Straincollectionnumbers(COLN) – JCM32476;UNIQEMU966 JCM32477;UNIQEMU969 16SrRNAgeneaccessionnumber
(16SR)
– KT247962 KT247971
Alternativehouse-keepinggenes:gene [accessionnumbers](HKGN)
– rpoB
33single-copyconservativeproteingenes Genomestatus(GSTA) – Draft:AArcht4T(accession
SAMN10160502)
Draft:(accessionSAMN10160504) AArcht7(accession
SAMN10160503)
GCmol%(GGCM) – 61.9–62.3(genomesofAArcht4T
andAArcht7)
61.1(genome) Countryoforigin(COUN) RussianFederation,Mongolia,
China,Egypt,USA
RussianFederation,Mongolia, China,Egypt,USA
USA Regionoforigin(REGI) – Altairegion;N-EMongolia,Inner
Mongolia,WadialNatrun, California
California
Dateofisolation(DATI) – 2011–2013 2012
Sourceofisolation(SOUR) Surfacesedimentsandbrinesof hypersaline
alkalinelakes
Surfacesedimentsandbrinesof hypersalinesodalakes
Surfacesedimentsofhypersaline alkalineSearlesLake
Samplingdates(DATS) 1999–2013 1999–2013 2005
Geographiclocation(GEOL) S–WSiberia,N–EMongolia,Inner Mongolia,NorthernAfrica,North America
S–WSiberia,N–EMongolia,Inner Mongolia,NorthernAfrica,North America
NorthAmerica
Latitude(LATI) – – N35◦44
Longtitude(LONG) – – W117◦20
Depth(DEPT) 0–0.1m 0–0.1m 0–0.1m
Temperatureofthesample(TEMS) 15–25◦C 15–25◦C 20◦C
pHofthesample(PHSA) 9–11.0 9.5–11.0 9.0
Salinityofthesample(SALS) 18–40% 18–40% 35%
Numberofstrainsinstudy(NSTR) 12 11 1
Sourceofisolationofnon-typestrains (SAMP)
– Hypersalinealkalinelakesin Russia,Mongolia,ChinaandUSA
– Growthmedium,incubationconditions
(CULT)
Alkalinemediumcontaining4M Na+withpH9–9.5andchitinas
substrate
4MtotalNa+,equalmixofsodium
carbonateandNaClonthebasisof Namolarity,pH9.5;incubation −37◦C;amorphouschitinasC,
energyandN-source
4MtotalNa+,1:3mixofsodium
carbonateandNaClonthebasisof Namolarity,pH9;incubation −37◦C;amorphouschitinasC,
energyandN-source Conditionsofpreservation(PRES) Deepfreezingin15%glycerol(v/v)
Gramstain(GRAM) Negative
Cellshape(CSHA) Pleomorphic,fromflatrodstococci
Cellsize(CSZI) – 0.6–1mindiameter,lengthis
variablefrom1to4m
0.6–1.2mindiameter,lengthis variablefrom1to5m
Motility(MOTY) – nonmotile
Motilitytype(MOTK) – Typeofflagellation(TFLA) – Sporulation(SPOR) none
Colonymorphology(COLM) Pink–orange Pink–orange,upto2mm Paleorange,upto1.5mm Temperaturerangeforgrowth(TEMR) 20–55◦C 20–53◦C 25–55◦C
D.Y.Sorokinetal./SystematicandAppliedMicrobiology42(2019)309–318 317 Table4(Continued)
Parameter Genus:Natrarchaeobiusgen.nov. Species:Natrarchaeobius chitinivoranssp.nov.
Species:Natrarchaeobius halalkaliphilussp.nov. Highesttemperatureforgrowth(TEMH) 55 50(atpH9) 55(atpH8.5)
Optimaltemperatureforgrowth(TEMO) 43–45◦C 43◦C 45◦C
LowestpHforgrowth(PHLO) 6.5 7.0 6.5
HighestpHforgrowth(PHHI) 10 10 9.5
OptimumpHforgrowth(PHOP) 8.5–9.3 9.1–9.3 8.5
pHcategory(PHCA) Alkaliphile(optimum>8.5) LowestNaClconcentrationforgrowth
(SALL)
3.0MtotalNa+
HighestNaClconcentrationforgrowth (SALH)
5MtotalNa+
Optimumsaltconcentrationforgrowth (SALO)
3.5–4.0MtotalNa+ 4.0MtotalNa+ 3.5MtotalNa+
Othersaltsimportantforgrowth Sodiumcarbonates
Salinitycategory(SALC) extremehalophilic(optimum3.5–4MNa+)
Relationtooxygene(OREL) Aerobe O2conditionsforstraintesting(OCON) Aerobic
Carbonsourceused(class)(CSUC) Carbohydrates
Specificcompounds(CSUC) Chitin,chitosane,hexoses Glucosamine,
N-acetylglucosamine,sucrose, maltose,trehalose,melizitose, cellobiose,glycerol
Glucosamine,
N-acetylglucosamine,sucrose, maltose,trehalose,melizitose, fructose,glycerol
Nitrogensource(NSOU) Ammonium Terminalelectronacceptor(ELAC) O2
Energymetabolism(EMET) Chemoorganotrophic
Phospholipids(PHOS) Coremembranelipidsarearchaeol(C20–C20DGE)andC20–C25DGE
Polarlipidsarephosphatidylglycerophosphatemethylester(PGP-Me),phosphatidylglycerol(PG)
Glycolipids(GLYC) – Phosphatidylglycose(GL-PG),
diglycosyl(2GL)
Respiratoryquinons MK8:0 MK8:0 MK8:0
Habitat(HABT) Hypersalinealkalinelakes
Extraordinaryfeautres(EXTR) Fastgrowthwithchitinandchitosaneinhypersalinealkalinebrines Multiplechitinasegenes(GH18family)inthegenomes
(–),notfixedforthetaxon.
Boldtextmeanstheorganismsdescribedinthisarticleincontrasttothereferenceorganismsusedforcomparison.
Natrarchaeobiuschitinivorans,andtheSearlesLakeisolate
AArcht-SlTinanewspeciesNatrarchaeobiushalalkaliphilus.Theprotologue
summarizingpropertiesofthesethreenoveltaxaispresentedin
Table4.
Fundinginformation
ThisworkwassupportedbytheRussianScienceFoundation (grant16-14-00121)totheRussianauthorsandbytheEuropean ResearchCouncil(ERC)undertheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020 researchand innovationprogram(grantagreementno. 694569-MICROLIPIDS)totheDutchauthors.
Acknowledgements
WethankNadezhdaKostrikinaforassistancewiththeelectron microscopy.
AppendixA. Supplementarydata
Supplementarydataassociatedwiththisarticlecanbefound, intheonlineversion,athttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2019.01. 001.
References
[1]Amoozegar,M.A.,Siroosi,M.,Atashgahi,S.,Smidt,H.,Ventosa,A.(2017) Sys-tematics ofhaloarchaea andbiotechnologicalpotentialoftheirhydrolytic enzymes.Microbiology(UnitedKingdom)163(5),623–645,http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1099/mic.0.000463.
[2]Andrei,A.S¸.,Banciu,H.L.,Oren,A.(2012)Livingwithsalt:metabolicand phy-logeneticdiversityofarchaeainhabitingsalineecosystems.FEMSMicrobiol. Lett.330(1),1–9,http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02526.x.
[3]Bhatnagar,T.,Boutaiba,S.,Hacene,H.,Cayol,J.L.,Fardeau,M.L.,Ollivier,B., Baratti,J.C.(2005)LipolyticactivityfromHalobacteria:screeningand hydro-laseproduction.FEMSMicrobiol.Lett.248(2),133–140,http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.femsle.2005.05.044.
[4]Bonete,M.J.,Martinez-Espinosa,R.M.(2011)Enzymesfromhalophilicarchaea: open questions.In: Ventosa, A., Oren, A., Ma, Y. (Eds.), Halophiles and HypersalineEnvironments:CurrentResearchandFutureTrends,Springer, Hei-delberg,Dordrecht,London,NewYork,pp.359–371.
[5]Camacho,C.,Coulouris,G.,Avagyan,V.,Ma,N.,Papadopoulos,J.,Bealer,K., Mad-den,T.L.(2009)BLAST+:architectureandapplications.BMCBioinformatics10, 1–9,http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-421.
[6]Chen,I.M.A.,Markowitz,V.M.,Chu,K.,Palaniappan,K.,Szeto,E.,Pillay,M., Rat-ner,A.,Huang,J.,Andersen,E.,Huntemann,M.,Varghese,N.,Hadjithomas,M., Tennessen,K.,Nielsen,T.,Ivanova,N.N.,Kyrpides,N.C.(2017)IMG/M: inte-gratedgenomeandmetagenomecomparativedataanalysissystem.Nucleic AcidsRes.45(D1),D507–D516,http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw929. [7]Collins,M.D.(1985)Analysisofisoprenoidquinones.MethodsMicrobiol.18,
329–363.
[8]Dana,G.L.,Lenz,P.H.(1986)EffectsofincreasingsalinityonanArtemia popula-tionfromMonoLake,California.Oecologia68(3),428–436,http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/BF01036751.
[9]Dominova,I.N.,Sorokin,D.Y.,Kublanov,I.V.,Patrushev,M.V.,Toshchakov,S.V. (2013)CompletegenomesequenceofSalinarchaeumsp.strainHArcht-Bsk1T, isolatedfromhypersalinelakeBaskunchak,Russia.GenomeAnnounc.1(4), e00505–e00513,http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00505-13.
[10]Enache,M.,Kamekura,M.(2010)Hydrolyticenzymesofhalophilic microor-ganismsandtheireconomicvalues.Rom.J.Biochem.59(1),47–59. [11]Elling,F.J.,Becker,K.W.,Könneke,M.,Schröder,J.M.,Kellermann,M.Y.,Thomm,
M.,Hinrichs,Kai-Uwe(2016)RespiratoryquinonesinArchaea:phylogenetic distributionandapplicationasbiomarkersinthemarineenvironment.Environ. Microbiol.18,692–707,http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13086. [12]Grant,W.D.,Jones,B.E.(2016)Bacteria,archaeaandvirusesofsodalakes.In:
Schagerl,M.(Ed.),SodaLakesofEastAfrica,SpringerInternationalPublishing, Cham,pp.97–147.
[13]Gutiérrez,M.C.,Castillo,A.M.,Kamekura,M.,Xue,Y.,Ma,Y.,Cowan,D.A.,Jones, B.E.,Grant,W.D.,Ventosa,A.(2007)Halopigerxanaduensisgen.nov.,sp.nov.,an extremelyhalophilicarchaeonisolatedfromsalineLakeShangmatalainInner Mongolia,China.Int.J.Syst.Evol.Microbiol.57(7),1402–1407,http://dx.doi. org/10.1099/ijs.0.65001-0.
[14]Hatori,Y.,Sato,M.,Orishimo,K.,Yatsunami,R.,Endo,K.,Fukui,T.,Nakamura, S.(2006)Characterizationofrecombinantfamily18chitinasefromextremely
halophilicarchaeonHalobacteriumsalinarumstrainNRC-1.ChitinChitosanRes. 12.
[15]Hou,J.,Han,J.,Cai,L.,Zhou,J.,Lü,Y.,Jin,C.,Liu,J.,Xiang,H.(2014) Characteri-zationofgenesforchitincatabolisminHaloferaxmediterranei.Appl.Microbiol. Biotechnol.98(3),1185–1194,http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4969-8. [16]Kamekura,M.,Dyall-Smith,M.L.(1995)Taxonomyofthefamily Halobacteri-aceaeandthedescriptionoftwonewgeneraHalorubrobacteriumandNatrialba. J.Gen.Appl.Microbiol.41,333–350.
[17]Katoh,K.,Rozewicki,J.,Yamada,K.D.(2017)MAFFTonlineservice:multiple sequencealignment,interactivesequencechoiceandvisualization.Brief Bioin-form.(December),1–7,http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108.
[18]Kumar,S.,Stecher,G.,Tamura,K.(2016)MEGA7:molecularevolutionary genet-icsanalysisVersion7.0forBiggerDatasets.Mol.Biol.Evol.33(7),1870–1874, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054.
[19]Kurtz,S.,Phillippy,A.,Delcher,A.L.,Smoot,M.,Shumway,M.,Antonescu,C., Salzberg,S.L.(2004)Versatileandopensoftwareforcomparinglargegenomes. GenomeBiol.5,R12,http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12.
[20]Le,S.Q.,Gascuel,O.(2008)Animprovedgeneralaminoacidreplacement matrix.Mol.Biol.Evol.25(7),1307–1320,http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/ msn067.
[21]Li,X.,Yu,H.Y.(2013)Characterizationofahalostableendoglucanasewith organicsolvent-tolerantpropertyfromHaloarculasp.G10.Int.J.Biol. Macro-mol.62,101–106,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.08.047. [22]Li,X.,Yu,H.Y.(2013)Halostablecellulasewithorganicsolventtolerancefrom
Haloarculasp.LLSG7anditsapplicationinbioethanolfermentationusing agri-culturalwastes.J.Ind.Microbiol.Biotechnol.40(12),1357–1365,http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s10295-013-1340-0.
[23]Meier-Kolthoff,J.P.,Auch,A.F.,Klenk,H.P.,Göker,M.(2013)Genome sequence-basedspeciesdelimitationwithconfidenceintervalsandimproveddistance functions.BMCBioinformatics14, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-60.
[24]Minegishi,H., Enomoto,S.,Echigo,A., Shimane,Y.,Kondo, Y.,Inoma, A., Kamekura,M.,Takai,K.,Itoh,T.,Ohkuma,M.,Ihara,K.,Takahashi-Ando,N., Fukushima,Y.,Ishii,S.,Yoshida,Y.,Usami,R.(2017)Salinarchaeum chitini-lyticumsp.nov.,achitin-degradinghaloarchaeonisolatedfromcommercial salt.Int.J.Syst.Evol.Microbiol.67(7),2274–2278,http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ ijsem.0.001941.
[25]Moshfegh,M.,Shahverdi,A.R.,Zarrini,G.,Faramarzi,M.A.(2013) Biochemi-calcharacterizationofanextracellularpolyextremophilic␣-amylasefromthe halophilicarchaeonHalorubrumxinjiangense.Extremophiles17(4),677–687, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00792-013-0551-7.
[26]Oren,A.(2011)Diversityofhalophiles.In:Horikoshi,K.(Ed.),Extremophiles Handbook,Springer,Tokyo,pp.309–325.
[27]Oren,A.(2013)Lifeathighsaltconcentrations.In:Rosenberg,E.,DeLong,E.F., Lory,S.,Stackebrandt,E.,Thompson,F.(Eds.),TheProkaryotes:Prokaryotic CommunitiesandEcophysiology,SpringerBerlinHeidelberg,Berlin, Heidel-berg,pp.421–440.
[28]Oren,A.(2014)TaxonomyofhalophilicArchaea:currentstatusandfuture chal-lenges.Extremophiles18(5),825–834, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00792-014-0654-9.
[29]Oren,A.(2015)Halophilicmicrobialcommunitiesandtheirenvironments. Curr.Opin.Biotechnol.33,119–124.
[30]Oren,A.(2017)Natrialbaceae.In:Whitman,W.B.(Ed.),Bergey’sManualof Sys-tematicofBacteriaandArchaea,JohnWiley&Sons,Ltd.,Chichester,http://dx. doi.org/10.1002/9781118960608.fbm00292.
[31]Nei,M.,Kumar,S.2000MolecularEvolutionandPhylogenetics,Oxford Univer-sityPress,Oxford.
[32]Parks,D.H.,Chuvochina,M.,Waite,D.W.,Rinke,C.,Skarshewski,A.,Chaumeil, P.-A.,Hugenholtz,P.(2018)Aproposalforastandardizedbacterialtaxonomy basedongenomephylogeny.Nat.Biotechnol.36,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nbt.4229.
[34]Selim, S.,Hagagy,N.,Abdel Aziz,M.,El-Meleigy,E.S.,Pessione,E.(2014) Thermostable alkalinehalophilic-proteaseproductionbyNatronolimnobius innermongolicusWN18.Nat.Prod.Res.28(18),1476–1479,http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/14786419.2014.907288.
[35]SinningheDamsté,J.S.,Rijpstra,W.I.C.,Hopmans,E.C.,Jung,M.Y.,Kim,J.G.,Rhee, S.K.,Stieglmeier,M.,Schleper,C.(2012)Intactpolarandcoreglycerol dibiphy-tanylglyceroltetraetherlipidsofgroupI.1aandI.1bThaumarchaeotainsoil. Appl.Environ.Microbiol.78(19),6866–6874,http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM. 01681-12.
[36]Sorokin,D.Y.,Khijniak,T.V.,Kostrikina,N.A.,Elcheninov,A.G.,Toshchakov,S.V., Bale,N.J.,Damsté,J.S.S.,Kublanov,I.V.(2018)Natronobiformacellulositropha gen.nov.,sp.nov.,anovelhaloalkaliphilicmemberofthefamilyNatrialbaceae (classHalobacteria)fromhypersalinealkalinelakes.Syst.Appl.Microbiol.6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2018.04.002,article942.
[37]Sorokin, D.Y., Toshchakov, S.V., Kolganova, T.V., Kublanov, I.V. (2015) Halo(natrono)archaea isolatedfromhypersalinelakesutilizecelluloseand chitinasgrowthsubstrates.Front.Microbiol.6,1–14,http://dx.doi.org/10. 3389/fmicb.2015.00942.
[38]vanBreugel,F.,Dickinson,M.H.(2017)Superhydrophobicdivingflies(Ephydra hians)andthehypersalinewatersofMonoLake.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A. 114(51),http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714874114,201714874.
[39]Villesen,P.(2007)FaBox:anonlinetoolboxforFASTAsequences.Mol.Ecol. Notes7(6),965–968,http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01821.x. [40]Weijers,J.W.H.,Panoto,E.,vanBleijswijk,J.,Schouten,S.,Rijpstra,W.I.C.,Balk,
M.,Stams,A.J.M.,Damsté,J.S.S.(2009)Constraintsonthebiologicalsource(s) oftheorphanbranchedtetraethermembranelipids.Geomicrobiol.J.26(6), 402–414,http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490450902937293.
[41]Xu,Y.,Wang,Z.,Xue,Y.,Zhou,P.,Ma,Y.,Ventosa,A.,Grant,W.D.(2001) Natrialbahulunbeirensissp.nov.andNatrialbachahannaoensissp.nov.,novel haloalkaliphilicarchaeafromsodalakesinInnerMongoliaAutonomousRegion, China.Int.J.Syst.Evol.Microbiol.51(5),1693–1698,http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ 00207713-51-5-1693.