• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

The efficacy of complete blood count parameters in the diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "The efficacy of complete blood count parameters in the diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy"

Copied!
5
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 823-827. P R A C E. O R Y G I N A L N E po ł o ż n i c t wo. The efficacy of complete blood count parameters in the diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy Skuteczność oznaczania parametrów morfologii w diagnostyce ciąży ektopowej jajowodowej )DWPD(VNLFLR÷OXï$OSHU7XQJDg]GHPLUð*O]DU$U]X7XUDQñ(VUD%DKDU*Uñ (VLQ.DVDSñ0LQH*HQoñ 1. Celal Bayar University, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manisa, Turkey ² Ege University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Stem Cell, Izmir, Turkey ³ Şifa University, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Izmir, Turkey. Abstract Objective: Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is the major cause of maternal morbidity and is responsible for maternal mortality in the first trimester. In order to reduce undesirable results, it is necessary to find rapid and accurate, non-surgical diagnostic tests for EP. The goal of the study was to investigate the differences in complete blood count parameters between tubal EPs and healthy pregnancies in be used in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Study design: White blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, monocyte, lymphocyte, platelet (PLT) counts, mean PLT volume (MPV) and PLT distribution width (PDW) levels in the complete blood count samples have been obtained from subjects with diagnosed tubal EP (n=78; study group) and women with healthy intrauterine gestations (n=79; control group). Statistical comparisons between groups were performed using the t test. Results: PDW levels were found to be significantly higher in the control group than EP (p<0.001). However, no differences between the study and control groups with regard to PLT and MPV levels were observed. WBC levels were found to be significantly higher in the EP group as compared to controls (p<0.001). When leukocyte differentials were compared, monocyte counts in the EP group were significantly higher than in controls (p=0.005). No statistically significant differences in neutrophil and lymphocyte values were observed in either group. Conclusion: PDW as an indicator of PLT activation is lower in tubal EP than intrauterine pregnancy so, possibly, endometrial invasion in the intrauterine pregnancy needs more PLT activation. Monocyte counts are higher in tubal EP, indicating that monocyte activation in the pathophysiology of EP could be effective in the formation of tubal motility and microenvironment regulation.. Key words: ectopic pregnancy / monocyte / platelet activation / leukocyte count /. Address for correspondence: Fatma Eskicioğlu Dept. Of Ob&Gyn, Medical Faculty of Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey 45050 Tel: +90(505)2595349 Fax:+90(236)2327462 e-mail: fatmaeskicioglu@gmail.com. Nr 11/2014. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. Otrzymano: 26.02.2014 Zaakceptowano do druku: 25.07.2014. 823.

(2) Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 823-827. P R A C E O R Y G I N A L N E poł ożn i ct wo. Fatma Eskicioğlu et al. The efficacy of complete blood count parameters in the diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy.. Streszczenie Cel: Ciąża ektopowa (EP) jest główną przyczyną śmiertelności matek w pierwszym trymestrze ciąży. Aby zmniejszyć niekorzystne wyniki tej choroby, konieczne jest znalezienie szybkiego i właściwego testu nieoperacyjnego służącego do rozpoznania EP. Celem badania była ocena różnic w wynikach morfologii pomiędzy pacjentkami z ciążą ektopową a zdrowymi ciężarnymi. Materiał i metoda: W próbkach pełnej krwi zbadano następujące parametry: leukocyty (WBC), neutrofile, monocyty, limfocyty, płytki krwi (PLT), średnią objętość płytki krwi (MPV), szerokość rozdziału płytek (PDW) u pacjentek z rozpoznaną ciążą jajowodową (n=78, grupa badana) oraz u zdrowych ciężarnych (n=79, grupa kontrolna). Analiza statystyczna porównująca obie grupy została wykonana przy pomocy testu t. Wyniki: PDW był istotnie wyższy w grupie kontrolnej niż w grupie EP (p<0,001). Jednak nie znaleziono różnic pomiędzy grupą badaną a kontrolną w odniesieniu do PLT i MPV. WBC było istotnie wyższe w grupie z EP niż w grupie kontrolnej (p<0,001). Odsetek monocytów był istotnie wyższy w grupie EP niż w grupie kontrolnej (p=0,005). Nie obserwowano istotnych różnic w odniesieniu do neutrofili i limfocytów w obu grupach. Wnioski: PDW jako wskaźnik aktywacji płytek krwi jest niższy w ciąży ektopowej niż w ciąży wewnątrzmacicznej, gdyż prawdopodobnie inwazja ciąży w  endometrium wymaga większej aktywacji PLT. Odsetek monocytów jest wyższy w ciąży jajowodowej co wskazuje na udział monocytów w procesie patofizjologicznym ciąży ektopowej, w perystaltyce jajowodu i regulacji jego mikrośrodowiska.. Słowa kluczowe: 

(3) / monocyty /   

(4)     / / odsetek leukocytów /. Introduction (FWRSLFSUHJQDQF\ (3

(5) LVGH¿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

(7) LVDOVRQRWHG>@039LVDVLPSOHSODWHOHW 3/7

(8)  LQGH[DQGWKHFRPELQHGXVHRI039DQG3/7GLVWULEXWLRQZLGWK 3':

(9) DPRUHVSHFL¿FPDUNHURI3/7DFWLYDWLRQFRXOGSUHGLFW DFWLYDWLRQRI3/7PRUHHI¿FLHQWO\>@$QLQFUHDVHLQWKH039 3':OHYHOVDQGOHXNRF\WHFRXQWVHVSHFLDOO\QHXWURSKLOQXPEHUV LV PRUH QRWLFHDEOH LQ SUHHFODPSVLD FKDUDFWHUL]HG E\ DEQRUPDO SODFHQWDO LQYDVLRQ DQG H[DJJHUDWHG LQÀDPPDWRU\ UHVSRQVH FRPSDUHGWRDQRUPDOKHDOWK\SUHJQDQF\>@(3LQFUHDVHV LQÀ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¿QG WKH GLIIHUHQFHV LQ WKH ZKLWH EORRG FRXQW :%&

(10) VXEJURXSV3/7039DQG3':OHYHOVEHWZHHQ(3VDQG KHDOWK\SUHJQDQFLHVLQRUGHUWRDFFHOHUDWHWKHGLDJQRVLVRIHFWRSLF SUHJQDQF\. Materials and methods 7KHVWXG\ZDVDSSURYHGE\WKH(WKLFV&RPPLWWHHRI&HODO %D\DU8QLYHUVLW\6HYHQW\HLJKWZRPHQRSHUDWHGRQGXHWRWXEDO (3DQGZLWKWKHGLDJQRVLVFRQ¿UPHGE\FRQFOXVLYHSDWKRORJLFDO UHVXOWVFRQVWLWXWHGWKHVWXG\JURXS7KHFRQWUROJURXSFRQVLVWHG RI  ZRPHQ DW  ZHHNV RI KHDOWK\ LQWUDXWHULQH JHVWDWLRQV FRQ¿UPHG E\ DQ XOWUDVRXQG H[DPLQDWLRQ SRVLWLYH IHWDO KHDUW UDWHV

(11) 7KHH[FOXVLRQFULWHULDZHUHXQVWDEOHKHPRG\QDPLFVWDWXV FKURQLFLQÀDPPDWRU\GLVHDVHVUHQDOFDUGLDFRUOLYHUGLVHDVHRUDO FRQWUDFHSWLYHVZKLFKPLJKWDIIHFWWKHSDUDPHWHUVRIFRDJXODWLRQ SHUPDQHQW XVH RI DQWLFRDJXODQWV VPRNLQJ KHPRJORELQRSDWK\ DQHPLDDQGFRDJXORSDWKLHV 'HPRJUDSKLF GDWD RI  SDUWLFLSDQWV DJH JUDYLGLW\ LQFOXGLQJ WKH FXUUHQW SUHJQDQF\ SDULW\ DERUWLRQV WKH QXPEHU RI OLYLQJ FKLOGUHQ DQG JHVWDWLRQDO DJH

(12)  ZHUH FROOHFWHG $IWHU DGPLVVLRQ WKH WLPH RI GLDJQRVLV :%& QHXWURSKLO PRQRF\WH O\PSKRF\WH3/7FRXQWV039DQG3':OHYHOVZHUHHYDOXDWHG LQWKHFRPSOHWHEORRGFRXQWVDPSOHVGUDZQLQWRYDFXWDLQHUP/ YROXPHWXEHVFRQWDLQLQJPJ.('7$%ORRGVDPSOHVZHUH DQDO\]HG ZLWKLQ RQH KRXU VLQFH VDPSOLQJ ZLWK D FRPPHUFLDOO\ DYDLODEOHDQDO\]HU +HPDWRORJ\DQDO\]HU&HOO'\Q$EERWW /DERUDWRULHV$EERWW3DUN,OOLQRLV86$

(13) . © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. Nr 11/2014.

(14) Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 823-827. P R A C E. O R Y G I N A L N E po ł o ż n i c t wo. Fatma Eskicioğlu et al. The efficacy of complete blood count parameters in the diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy.. Statistical analysis. 7KHVWDWLVWLFDOSDFNDJH6366IRU:LQGRZV 6WDWLVWLFDO 3DFNDJHIRU6RFLDO6FLHQFHV6366,QF&KLFDJR,/

(15) ZDVXVHG WRDQDO\]HWKHGDWD6WDWLVWLFDOFRPSDULVRQVEHWZHHQJURXSVZHUH SHUIRUPHG XVLQJ WKH W WHVW 0HDQ DQG VWDQGDUG GHYLDWLRQV ZHUH XVHGWRGHVFULEHGDWD3YDOXHVZHUHDFFHSWHGDVVLJQL¿FDQW. Results 7KH PHGLDQ RI WKH JHVWDWLRQDO DJH ZDV  ZHHNV PHDQ “

(16) LQWKHFRQWUROJURXS'HPRJUDSKLFGDWDIRUERWKJURXSV ZHUH VKRZQ LQ 7DEOH , $JH JUDYLGLW\ SDULW\ WKH QXPEHU RI DERUWLRQVDQGRIOLYLQJFKLOGUHQZHUHIRXQGWREHKLJKHULQWKH(3 JURXSDVFRPSDUHGWRFRQWUROV 0393':3/7:%&QHXWURSKLOPRQRF\WHO\PSKRF\WH FRXQWV ZHUH VKRZQ LQ 7DEOH ,, 3': OHYHOV ZHUH VLJQL¿FDQWO\ KLJKHULQFRQWUROVWKDQWKHVWXG\JURXS S

(17) 7KHUHZHUHQR GLIIHUHQFHVEHWZHHQ(3DQGWKHFRQWUROJURXSLQWHUPVRI3/7DQG 039OHYHOV S DQGS 

(18) :%&OHYHOVZHUHVLJQL¿FDQWO\ KLJKHULQWKH(3JURXSWKDQFRQWUROV S

(19) :KHQOHXNRF\WH GLIIHUHQWLDOV ZHUH FRPSDUHG PRQRF\WH FRXQWV LQ WKH (3 JURXS ZHUH VLJQL¿FDQWO\ KLJKHU WKDQ LQ WKH FRQWURO JURXS S 

(20)  1RVWDWLVWLFDOO\VLJQL¿FDQWGLIIHUHQFHZDVREVHUYHGEHWZHHQWKH JURXSVLQWHUPVRIQHXWURSKLODQGO\PSKRF\WHYDOXHV S DQG S 

(21) . Discussion (3 LV D PDMRU FDXVH RI PDWHUQDO PRUELGLW\ DQG LV UHVSRQ VLEOHIRUKLJKPDWHUQDOPRUWDOLW\LQWKH¿UVWWULPHVWHU>@,QWKH 8QLWHG6WDWHVWKHLQFLGHQFHRI(3LVHVWLPDWHGDW. 6LQFH WKH ¶V D VLJQL¿FDQW GHFUHDVH LQ PRUWDOLW\ KDV EHHQ QRWHG IURP  GHDWKV EHWZHHQ ± WR GHDWKVEHWZHHQDQG>@)XUWKHUUHGXF WLRQ RI WKH PRUWDOLW\ UDWHV GXH WR HFWRSLF SUHJQDQF\ LV SRVVLEOH ZLWK UDSLG GLDJQRVLV >@$ODV QRQVXUJLFDO WHVWV IRU UDSLG DQG SUHFLVH GLDJQRVLV RI (3 DUH XQDYDLODEOH &RQWHPSRUDU\ XOWUDVR QRJUDSK\DQGEORRGWHVWVDUHXVHGEXWWKH\DUHDEOHWRHVWDEOLVK WKH¿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ĮIHWRSURWHLQ&UH DFWLYH SURWHLQ DQG YDVFXODU HQGRWKHOLDO JURZWK IDFWRU 9(*)

(22)  KDYHEHHQVWXGLHGLQWKHKRSHRIHVWDEOLVKLQJWKH¿QDO(3GLDJQR VLVPRUHTXLFNO\+RZHYHUDWHVWZKLFK LIFRPELQHGZLWKK&* DQGXOWUDVRQRJUDSK\

(23) PLJKWLQFUHDVHVWKHYHORFLW\DQGSUHFLVLRQ RIWKHGLDJQRVWLFSURFHVVKDVQRWEHHQLGHQWL¿HG\HW>@. Table I. Demographic data in ectopic pregnancy (EP) and control groups (mean±SD, Standard Deviation). Age. EP (n=78). Control (n=79). P value. 30.65±6.07. 26.39±6.21. <0.001. Gravidity. 3.47±1.96. 1.88±1.42. <0.001. Parity. 1.55±1.35. 0.65±0.97. <0.001. Abortions. 0.69±1.04. 0.22±0.65. 0.001. Living children. 2.12±5.96. 0.54±0.93. 0.022. Table II. Platelet (PLT), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW) white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, monocyte and lymphocyte levels in ectopic pregnancy (EP) and control groups (mean±SD, Standard Deviation). PLT (K/uL). EP (n=78). Control (n=79). P value. 256.64±92.11. 270.58±62.92. 0.269. MPV (fL). 8.38±0.97. 8.69±1.14. 0.79. PDW. 11.55±1.78. 16.36±3.00. <0.001. WBC (K/uL). 11.53±5.18. 8.39±1.66. <0.001. Neutrophil (uL). 7.73±4.74. 5.88±7.36. 0.064. Monocyte (uL). 1.38±0.95. 0.90±1.15. 0.005. Lymphocyte (uL). 2.42±0.69. 2.25±0.62. 0.14. Nr 11/2014. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. 825.

(24) Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 823-827. P R A C E O R Y G I N A L N E poł ożn i ct wo. Fatma Eskicioğlu et al. The efficacy of complete blood count parameters in the diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy.. ,QRXUVWXG\ZHDLPHGWR¿QGDFRQQHFWLRQKHOSLQJWRGLV FULPLQDWHEHWZHHQHFWRSLFDQGLQWUDXWHULQHSUHJQDQFLHVLQFRP SOHWHEORRGFRXQWSDUDPHWHUVZKLFKDUHIUHTXHQWO\XVHGDVURX WLQHWHVWVLQFOLQLFDOSUDFWLFHRIFDUHLQSUHJQDQF\7RWKHEHVWRI RXUNQRZOHGJHWKHOLWHUDWXUHRIIHUVRQO\RQHUHSRUWRQWKHWRSLF LQTXHVWLRQ>@2XUFRQWUROJURXSFRQVLVWHGPDLQO\RISULPLSDUDV VR WKHUH ZHUH GLIIHUHQFHV EHWZHHQ WKH GHPRJUDSKLF GDWD RI WKH JURXSV7KHDQDO\VLVRI3/7DQG039YDOXHVUHYHDOHGQRVWDWLV WLFDOO\ VLJQL¿FDQW GLIIHUHQFHV EHWZHHQ WKH JURXSV 3': YDOXHV ZHUHVLJQL¿FDQWO\ORZHULQWKH(3JURXS:%&FRXQWZDVVLJQL¿ FDQWO\KLJKHULQWKH(3JURXS,QOHXNRF\WHGLIIHUHQWLDODQDO\VLV QHXWURSKLOO\PSKRF\WHDQGPRQRF\WHFRXQWVZHUHKLJKHULQWKH (3 JURXS DV FRPSDUHG WR FRQWUROV DOWKRXJK VWDWLVWLFDO VLJQL¿ FDQFHZDVGHWHUPLQHGRQO\ZLWKUHJDUGWRWKHPRQRF\WHQXPEHU :KLOH7XUJXWHWDO>@IRXQGVLPLODUFRUUHODWLRQVLQ:%&QXP EHUVLQ(3VWKH\GHWHFWHGKLJKHU039YDOXHVLQWKH(3JURXS ZKDWZDVGLIIHUHQWIURPRXU¿QGLQJV,QWKHOLWHUDWXUHUHVXOWVRI 039 YDOXHV LQ SUHJQDQF\ DUH FRQWUDGLFWRU\ 1XPHURXV VWXGLHV DERXWSUHHFODPSWLFSDWLHQWVZLWKDEQRUPDOFRXUVHRISUHJQDQF\ FKDUDFWHUL]HG E\ DEQRUPDO SODFHQWDO LQYDVLRQ JHQHWLF GLVSRVL WLRQLPPXQRORJLFRUVHYHUHLQÀ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—/>@ ,QRXUVWXG\WKHYDOXHVZHUHZLWKLQWKDWUDQJH/HXNRF\WRVLV LV D UHVXOW RI DQ RQJRLQJ LQÀDPPDWRU\ SURFHVV >@ /HXNRF\WH DFWLYDWLRQ DQG YDULRXV LPPXQH PHGLDWRUV VXFK DV DGKHVLRQ PROHFXOHVZKLFKDUHH[SUHVVHGIURPWKHPIHDWXUHLQWKHFRXUVH RI SUHJQDQF\ IURP LPSODQWDWLRQ RQZDUG >@7KHUH LV DOVR DQ LQFUHDVH LQ WKH FRXQW RI ODUJH JUDQXODU O\PSKRF\WHV ZKLFK DUH WKRXJKW WR RULJLQDWH IURP WKH ERQH PRUURZ LQ WKH PLGOXWHDO SKDVH GXULQJ ZKLFK LPSODQWDWLRQ RFFXUV 7KHVH FHOOV VHFUHWLQJ JUDQXORF\WHPDFURSKDJH VWLPXODWLQJ IDFWRU *0&6)

(25)  DUH QRWDEO\DFWLYHDQGKHOSWURSKREODVWLFLQYDVLRQ>@ 7KH HWLRORJ\ RI (3 UHPDLQV XQNQRZQ ,W LV FODLPHG WR EH FDXVHG E\ WKH FKDQJHV ZKLFK DOORZ UHWHQWLRQ LQ WXEDO WUDQVSRUW RI WKH HPEU\R DQG LPSODQWDWLRQ LQ WXEDO HQYLURQPHQW >@ 0HFKDQLVPV OLNH DQJLRJHQHVLV DFWLYDWHG ZLWK K\SR[LD PXVFOH FHOOGDPDJHDQGLQÀDPPDWRU\SURFHVVDUHEHOLHYHGWRSOD\DSDUW LQWXEDOHQYLURQPHQWFKDQJHV(OHYDWHGFUHDWLQHNLQDVHOHYHOVDV WKHPDUNHURIVPRRWKPXVFOHGDPDJHKDYHEHHQREVHUYHGLQ(3 FDVHVLQYDVLYHRIWKHWXEDOZDOO$OWKRXJKIDOORSLDQWXEHVDUHQRW DVULFKDVWKHXWHUXVLQWHUPVRIYDVFXODUL]DWLRQWKHRFFXUUHQFH RI LPSODQWDWLRQ KDV EHHQ DWWHPSWHG WR EH H[SODLQHG YLD WKH DFWLYDWLRQRI9(*)ZKLFKLVDPDUNHURIDQJLRJHQHVLV7KHUHLV DSRVLWLYHFRUUHODWLRQEHWZHHQVHUXP9(*)DQGEHWDK&*OHYHOV >@ ,W LV MXVWL¿HG E\ WKH IDFW WKDW LQÀDPPDWRU\ F\WRNLQHV OLNH LQWHUOHXNLQ ,/

(26)  ,/ DQG WXPRU QHFURVLV IDFWRU 71)

(27) DOSKD DOVRLQFUHDVHLQ(3DQGWKH\DUHDEOHWRLGHQWLI\(3ZLWK VSHFL¿FLW\ DQG  VHQVLWLYLW\$Q LQFUHDVH LQ WKH QXPEHU RI OHXNRF\WHVVXSSRVHGWRWDNHSDUWLQWKLVLQÀDPPDWRU\SURFHVVLV. 826. DQH[SHFWHGUHVXOW>@ 6LQFHZHZHUHQRWDEOHWR¿QGDVWXG\H[DPLQLQJQHXWURSKLO PRQRF\WH DQG O\PSKRF\WH QXPEHUV LQ (3 LQ WKH OLWHUDWXUH ZH ZHUHIRUFHGWRUHO\RQO\RQWKHVWXGLHVRILQWUDXWHULQHSUHJQDQFLHV DQG SUHHFODPSWLF SDWLHQWV 3LWNLQ DQG :LWWH >@ GHPRQVWUDWHG QHXWURSKLOQXPEHUVWREHWZRWLPHVKLJKHULQSUHJQDQF\WKDQWKH SRVWSDUWXPSHULRGDQGDOWKRXJKPRQRF\WHQXPEHUVDOVRVKRZHGD WHQGHQF\WRLQFUHDVHGXULQJSUHJQDQF\WKHUHKDVEHHQDGHFUHDVH LQWKHQXPEHURIO\PSKRF\WHV$PRQJRWKHUVWKHLQÀDPPDWRU\ SURFHVV LV DQ XQGHUO\LQJ PHFKDQLVP RI SUHHFODPSVLD 7KH OLWHUDWXUHRIIHUVUHSRUWVRQHOHYDWHGOHXNRF\WHQXPEHUVUHODWHGWR QHXWURSKLOFRXQWLQSUHHFODPSVLDDVFRPSDUHGWRQRUPDOKHDOWK\ SUHJQDQFLHV+RZHYHUVRPHVWXGLHVGHPRQVWUDWHGQRGLIIHUHQFHV LQOHXNRF\WHFRXQWV>@:KHQZHHYDOXDWHGWKHOHXNRF\WH VXEXQLWV HYHQ WKRXJK ZH REVHUYHG HOHYDWHG O\PSKRF\WH DQG QHXWURSKLOFRXQWVZHDOVRQRWHGDPDMRUVWDWLVWLFDOO\VLJQL¿FDQW LQFUHDVH LQ WKH PRQRF\WH FRXQW ZKDW FRXOG EH OLQNHG WR WKH LQFUHDVH RI *0&6) UHOHDVHG E\ XWHULQH ODUJH JUDQXODU O\PSKRF\WHV ZKLFK WDNH SDUW LQ WKH LPSODQWDWLRQ SURFHVV *0 &6)FDXVHVFHOOSUROLIHUDWLRQPDWXUDWLRQDQGPRQRF\WHDFWLYDWLRQ DQG LW DOVR LQFUHDVHV VHFUHWLRQ RI LQÀDPPDWRU\ PHGLDWRUV OLNH ,/ DQG 71) >@ 5HOHDVH RI PRQRQXFOHDU SKDJRF\WH IURP ERQHPDUURZULVHVGXULQJWKHLQÀDPPDWLRQSURFHVVLQ(33URSHU UHFUXLWPHQW DQG GLIIHUHQWLDWLRQ RI PDFURSKDJHV SOD\  NH\ UROHV LQWKHGHYHORSPHQWRI(30RQRF\WHUHFUXLWPHQWGLIIHUHQWLDWLRQ DQGIXQFWLRQLQWKHUHSURGXFWLYHWUDFWDUHUHJXODWHGE\QXPHURXV XQLTXHDQGKDYLQJVXEVWDQWLDOUHSURGXFWLYHIXQFWLRQVF\WRNLQHV OLNH OHXNHPLD LQKLELWRU\ IDFWRU FRORQ\VWLPXODWLQJ IDFWRU  DQG WUDQVIRUPLQJ JURZWK IDFWRUE *0&6) &\WRNLQH W\SHV DQG OHYHOV DUH PRGXODWHG E\ HVWURJHQ SURJHVWHURQH DQG VHPLQDO SODVPD,PPXQRVXSSUHVVHGWURSKLFDQGVFDYHQJLQJPDFURSKDJHV UHJXODWHWXEDOPRWLOLW\E\SURGXFLQJSURVWDJODQGLQDQGLQFUHDVLQJ SURJHVWHURQHVHFUHWLRQ>@5HVXOWVRIDQLQYHVWLJDWLRQE\7RQHOOR DQG 3ROL >@ VXSSRUW WKH HOHYDWHG PRQRF\WH OHYHO GHWHFWHG LQ RXU VWXG\ E\ LQGLFDWLQJ WKDW PDFURSKDJHV ZKLFK DUH WKH IRUPV RI PRQRF\WHV LQ WLVVXH SOD\ D WLVVXH UHPRGHOLQJ DQG LPPXQH UHJXODWRU\UROHOHDGLQJWRPRWLOLW\DQGUHFHSWLYLW\LQWXED ,Q FRPSOHWH EORRG FRXQW UHSHDWHG UHJXODUO\ LQ SUHJQDQF\ FDUHWKH3/7FRXQWVGHFUHDVHGXULQJWKHWKLUGWULPHVWHUGHSHQGLQJ RQWKHLQFUHDVHRISODVPDYROXPH>@3/7YROXPHUDWKHUWKDQ 3/7FRXQWLQGLFDWHV3/7DFWLYDWLRQDQGUDLVHGSURGXFWLRQ>@ 6ROXEOHIDFWRUVUHOHDVHGIURPDFWLYH3/7VLQFUHDVHWKHLQYDVLRQ FDSDFLW\ RI WKH WURSKREODVW ,Q WKLV ZD\ 3/7V HQDEOH PDWHUQDO VSLUDODUWHULHVWRWUDQVIRUPLQWRORZUHVLVWDQFHODUJHFDOLEHUYHLQV >@ 3/7 DFWLYDWLRQ IDFWRU 3$)

(28)  UHOHDVHG IURP WKURPERF\WHV WDNHV DQ LPSRUWDQW SODFH LQ IHUWLOLW\ SK\VLRORJ\ 3$) ZKRVH VHFUHWLRQ LQFUHDVHV YLD SURJHVWHURQH DQG SURVWDJODQGLQ ( EHKDYHVDVSDUDFULQHE\LQGXFLQJWKHLQWHUDFWLRQRIK\SRWKDODPXV DQG VWURPDOHSLWKHOLXP FHOO LQ WKH XWHUXV >@ 3': DQG 039 DUH HDVLO\ PHDVXUHG 3/7 LQGLFHV ZKLFK LQFUHDVH GXULQJ 3/7 DFWLYDWLRQ 3/7V FKDQJH LQ VKDSH WR REWDLQ D ODUJHU VXUIDFH GXULQJ DFWLYDWLRQ $Q LQFUHDVH LQ ERWK 039 DQG 3': GXH WR 3/7 DFWLYDWLRQ UHVXOWLQJ IURP 3/7 VZHOOLQJ DQG SVHXGRSRGLD IRUPDWLRQKDVEHHQVXJJHVWHG3':LVDPRUHVSHFL¿FPDUNHU RI 3/7 DFWLYDWLRQ VLQFH LW GRHV QRW LQFUHDVH GXULQJ VLPSOH 3/7 VZHOOLQJ >@ ,Q WKH OLWHUDWXUH WKHUH DUH PDQ\ VWXGLHV WU\LQJ WR UHODWHHOHYDWHGYDOXHVRI039DQG3':WRSUHHFODPSVLDZKLFK LVDK\SHUWHQVLYHGLVHDVHRISUHJQDQF\>@7KHLGHDWKDW LQFUHDVHG OHYHOV RI 039 YDOXHV SRLQW WR D SUREDEOH ULVN RI. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. Nr 11/2014.

(29) Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 823-827. P R A C E. O R Y G I N A L N E po ł o ż n i c t wo. Fatma Eskicioğlu et al. The efficacy of complete blood count parameters in the diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy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¿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ource of financing: None. ³. >RO\O S] XY mMYX»SM^ YP SX^O\O]^]p aRSMR YMM_\] aROX ^RO K_^RY\ \OWKSX] SX. a financial or personal relationship which unjustly affects his/her actions associated with the publication of the manuscript. ³. =Y_\MO YP ºXKXMSXQ$. >RO K_^RY\] \OMOS`ON XY ºXKXMSKV ]_ZZY\^ PY\ ^RO. research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.. References 1. Sivalingam VN, Duncan WC, Kirk E, [et al.]. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2011, 37 (4), 231-240. 2. Orazulike NC, Konje JC. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. Women’s Health (Lond Engl). 2013, 9 (4), 373-385. 3. Rausch ME, Barnhart KT. Serum biomarkers for detecting ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012, 55 (2), 418-423. 4. Pitkin RM, Witte DL. Platelet and leukocyte counts in pregnancy. JAMA. 1979, 242 (24), 26962698. 5. Järemo P, Lindahl TL, Lennmarken C, Forsgren H. The use of platelet density and volume measurements to estimate the severity of pre-eclampsia. Eur J Clin Invest. 2000, 30 (12), 11131118. 6. Vagdatli E, Gounari E, Lazaridou E, [et al.]. Platelet distribution width: a simple, practical and specific marker of activation of coagulation. Hippokratia. 2010, 14 (1), 28-32. 7. Canzoneri BJ, Lewis DF, Groome L, Wang Y. Increased neutrophil numbers account for leukocytosis in women with preeclampsia. Am J Perinatol. 2009, 26 (10), 729-732. 8. Rosevear SK, Liggins GC. Platelet dimensions in pregnancy-induced hypertension. N Z Med J. 1986, 99 (802), 356-357. 9. Turgut A, Sak ME, Ozler A, [et al.]. Alteration of peripheral blood cells in tubal ectopic pregnancy. Ginekol Pol. 2013, 84 (3), 193-196. 10. Barnhart KT. Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361, 379–387. 11. Bachman EA, Barnhart K. Medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a comparison of regimens. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012, 55 (2), 440-447. 12. Cartwright J, Duncan WC, Critchley HO, [et al.]. Serum biomarkers of tubal ectopic pregnancy: current candidates and future possibilities. Reproduction. 2009, 138, 9–22. 13. Ceyhan T, Beyan C, Başer I, [et al.]. The effect of pre-eclampsia on complete blood count, platelet count and mean platelet volume. Ann Hematol. 2006, 85 (5), 320-322. 14. Taylor DJ, Phillips P, Lind T. Puerperal hematological indices. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981, 88 (6), 601-606.. Authors’ Contribution: 1. Fatma Eskicioğlu – concept, study design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, article draft, writing article, corresponding author. 2. Alper Tunga Özdemir – concept, article draft, study design, acquisition of data, revised article critically. 3. Gülüzar Arzu Turan – analysis and interpretation of data, writing article, revised article critically. 4. Esra Bahar Gür – revised article critically, writing article. 5. Esin Kasap – revised article critically. 6. Mine Genç – revised article critically. Authors’ statement ³ This is to certify, that the publication will not violate the copyrights of a third party, as understood according to the Act in the matter of copyright and related rights of 14 February 1994, Official Journal 2006, No. 90, Clause 63, with respect to the text, data, tables and illustrations (graphs, figures, photographs); ³ ^RO\O S] XY mMYX»SM^ YP SX^O\O]^]p aRSMR YMM_\] aROX ^RO K_^RY\ \OWKSX] SX. a financial or personal relationship which unjustly affects his/her actions associated with the publication of the manuscript; ³ any possible relationship(s) of the author(s) with the party/parties interested in the publication of the manuscript are revealed in the text of the article; ³ the manuscript has not been published in or submitted to any other journal.. Nr 11/2014. 15. Gearing AJ, Hemingway I, Pigott R, [et al.]. Soluble forms of vascular adhesion molecules, E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1: pathological significance. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1992, 667, 324-331. 16. Johnson PM, Christmas SE, Vince GS. Immunological aspects of implantation and implantation failure. Hum Reprod. 1999,14 Suppl 2, 26-36. 17. Shaw JL, Dey SK, Critchley HO, Horne AW. Current knowledge of the aetiology of human tubal ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update. 2010, 16 (4), 432-444. 18. Rausch ME, Barnhart KT. Serum biomarkers for detecting ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012, 55 (2), 418-423. 19. Khatami S, Brummer E, Stevens DA. Effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in vivo on cytokine production and proliferation by spleen cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 2001,125 (2), 198-201. 20. Tonello A, Poli G. Tubal ectopic pregnancy: macrophages under the microscope. Hum Reprod. 2007, 22 (10), 2577-2584. 21. Edelstam G, Löwbeer C, Kral G, [et al.]. New reference values for routine blood samples and human neutrophilic lipocalin during third-trimester pregnancy. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2001, 61 (8), 583-592. 22. Sato Y, Fujiwara H, Konishi I. Role of platelets in placentation. Med Mol Morphol. 2010, 43 (3), 129-133. 23. Harper MJ. Platelet-activating factor: a paracrine factor in preimplantation stages of reproduction? Biol Reprod. 1989, 40 (5), 907-913. 24. Saito S. Cytokine cross-talk between mother and the embryo/placenta. J Reprod Immunol. 2001, 52 (1-2), 15–33. 25. Goffin F, Munaut C, Malassiné A, [et al.]. Evidence of a limited contribution of feto-maternal interactions to trophoblast differentiation along the invasive pathway. Tissue Antigens. 2003, 62 (2), 104-116.. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. 827.

(30)

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

The complication was observed in a female patient who had been using oral contraceptives for many years and consisted in sud- den dyspnoea which developed on the first night af-

pierwotnej mielofibrozy w fazie proliferacyjnej. Wy- maga różnicowania z czerwienicą wtórną, w której jednak na ogół nie obserwuje się ani zwiększenia liczby neutrofilów,

Wydaje się, że stężenie progesteronu &lt; 5 ng/ml może być czułym testem w kierunku ciąży pozamacicznej.. Oznaczanie

U 70 pacjentek rozpoznania endometriosis genitalis externa dokonano przy okazji wykonywania zabiegów operacyjnych na jajowodzie, mających na celu usunięcie ciąży, a u 45

Nie można przecenić znaczenia seryjnego oznacza- nia poziomu beta-hCG w diagnostyce ciąży pozama- cicznej, gdyż w ciąży prawidłowej, w ciągu jej pierw- szych 2 mies.

The effect of disease control on mean platelet volume and red blood cell distribution in patients with acromeg- aly.. Int J Clin

A 33-year-old primipara, primigesta, with a history of multiple ovarian cysts surgery (including the last laparoscopic dermoid cysts excision five years ago), was admitted to

A twenty-eight-year-old female patient during the second pregnancy, about 6 hbd (according to the date of the last menstrual period) from the spontaneous cycle, was directed to