• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

An Almost Convergence and its Applications

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "An Almost Convergence and its Applications"

Copied!
10
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

LUBLIN-POLONIA

VOL. XXXII, 6 . SECTIOA 1978

Instytut Matematyki Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej

Tadeusz KUCZ U MOW

An Almost Convergence and its Applications O prawie zbieżności i jej zastosowaniach Об законе сходимости и ее приложениях

It is the purpose of the present paper to describe a class of sets which have a fixed point property for nonexpansive compact set valued mappings. We shall use asymptotic center technique [4].

Let X be a Banach space witch a norm || I! and let A" be a nonempty subset of X. We choose an arbitrary boundet sequence [x,] inX and a point x. A number

r(x, [x/]) = lim sup ||x - X/H

is called an asymptotic radius of [x, ] at x and a number

a([x/]) = inf r(x, [x, ])

* x e K

is an asymptotic radius of [x, J with respect to K (or in K). The set A (K, [x,]) = [x eK :r(x, [x,]) = rjcflx,])}

ls called an asymptotic center of [x,] in K. It is obvious that if [x,n] is a subsequence of ] then ([■*/„]) < rK (fxi ])• We will call the sequence [x,] regular with respect to K (shortly regular) if all its subsequences have the same asymptotic radius in A' and almost convergent with respect to K (shortly almost convergent) if all its subsequences have the same asymptotic center consisting of exactly one point x. Then we will write x=Ak~ -lirnx,-. In [9] K. Goebel proved the following very useful theorem.

(2)

Theorem 1. Any bounded sequence [x/] contains a regular (with respect to K) sub­

sequence.

The almost convergence and regularity of sequences have the following properties which we will collect in a few lemmas.

Lemma 1. a)[19]//x/ =xforevery iandx &K, thenAg -Mmxj-x.

i

b) [19]/M£ — limx,=x, then for every subsequence [xjn]Ag -limx/n = x.

i n

c) [19] If [x,] does not almost converge to xEK, then there exists a subsequence of which every sequence does not almost converge to x.

. A) If [x,] is regular in K, then every subsequence [xJ?!] is also regular in K and A (K, [x,J)CA(X, [x.J).

e) If [x/] is regular with respect to K and xEA(K, [x,]) then there exists lim ||x -

- x/|| and lim ||x - x, || - r(x, [x,]) = ^([x,]).

f) If [xf] is regular in K and x = Ag - lim X/, then for each y £ K\[x] we have.

rK ([*/]) = r(x, [x/P < lim inf ||y -x,||

i

Lemma 2. Let x belong to K. If for each regular subsequence [X(n]ofthe sequence [x,]

there exists subsequence [x,- ] which has [x]as its asymptotic center, then x=Ag —limx,-.

* i

In some Banach spaces we may say something more about almost convergent sequenc­

es. We call a Banach space X an Opial space with respect to a weak (weak—*) converg­

ence, if for every sequence [x,] in X, which converges weakly (weakly-*) to x 6X and for all y sLx we have lim sup ||y - x/|| > lim sup ||x - x,-|| Z. Opial introduced this condi­

tion in [20]. For connections between the Opial’s condition and other important pro­

perties of normed spaces cf. [11], [14], [17]. We say that X is uniformly convex in every direction (u.c.e.d.) if for all 0 < e < 2 and z EX with Hz I! =1 we have

5(e, z) = inf [ 1 — :||xl|<l, ll/IKl, llx-yii>e,

\ /V x-y

tea tz ]>0

fseefll.f21.18I r231ï

(3)

Lemma 3. Let X be an Opial space with respect to a weak (weak-*) convergence and weak (sequentially weak-*) compact. Then a sequence [x/] G K" is almost convergent iff it is weak (weak-*) convergent.

Lemma4. X is an u.c.e.d. Banach space and 0 ¥= K C X is convex. Then each regular sequence w th nonempty its asymptotic center is almost convergent in K.

Corollary 1 '[9] If X is an uniformly convex Banach space and K is a nonempty closed convex subset of X, then each regular (in K) sequence is almost convergent in K.

The next lemma answers the following question: are asymptotic centers of sequences are ‘similar’?

Lemma 5. Let X be a Banach space, 0 #= AT C X |x/] - bounded and x GA (K, [x/]) For a sequence of nonnegative real numbers [ot/] we define yj = cq Xj + (1 — a,) x (f - 1, 2,...). Then the following statements are fulfiled:

a) If a,- = a for each i and 0 < a < 1, then arg ([x/]) = rg ([y/J) and x G A (K, [y,]) C ex (X, [x,]).

b) Ifx=Ag - lim x/ and lim sup a,- < l,thenx =Ag — limy/..

c) //x =Ag — limx,-, 1 < lim sup cq < + '»andK is convex, then x = Ag - limy/.

The last properties of asymptotic centers are related to an notion of ‘inwardness’ ([12]).

Let X be a Banach space, 0 &K ZX and x G K. Then we define the inward set of x rela­

tive to K, denoted Ig (x), as follows

/jt(x) = [(1 — a)x + ay :y GAT, o > 0].

Lemma 6. For X, K as above and for a bounded sequence [x/] such that (x]=A (K, [x/]).

we have rK([xj])<r(y, [x/])=lim sup||y-x/||/or eac/ryG4;(x)\[x].

Lemma 7. If X is u.c.e.d., K is a nonemty convex subset ofX, [x/J is bounded and [x]=

(AT, [x, ]X then for every yG/jf(x)\[x] we have rg ([x,])<r(y, [xr]).

Now we may introduce a new topology in a nonempty subset K of a Banach space X.

Definition 1. A subset M of K is said to be Aj^ - closed if for each bounded sequence (*<] of its elements, which is almost convergent tox inX.havexGA/. A family of all A^ - closed subsets of A is a closed sets family of a new topology in K, that we will call an

— topology. A .will be called sequentially A -compact iff from each sequence [x/] of hs elements we may choose an almost convergent in K subsequence [x^].

(4)

Theorem 2. A sequence [x,] of elements of set K is convergent to x in an Ag - topo­

logy iff x=Ag -limxj.

I

Proof. It follows from well known facts relative to S* - spaces and L* — spaces (see [5], [15]).

Remark 1. We notice that if CK, then an Ag — topology in Kt may be different from an Ag — topology relativized to Kt (examples may be constructed in the same way as in [ 10], see also examples which are shown later in this paper).

Remark 2. If Kx and K2 are sequentially A — compact and K=K2 then K needn’t to be sequentially A — compact.

Remark 3. If K is sequentially A — compact, then is bounded and closed in (X, || ||).

Remark 4. It may happen, that anX^ — topology is a topology induced by a norm to­

pology of X even, if K is not compact.

Remark 5. It is known, that K is sequentially A — compact if:

a) K is compact,

b) K is weakly compact and X is an Opial space with respect to a weak convergence (then the Ag — topology is the weak — topology relativized to K),

z)K is weakly — * compact, A- is a Banach space that is adjoint to a separable Banach space and X is an Opial space with respect to a weak — * convergence (then the Ag — to­

pology is the weak - * topology relativized to K),

i)K is a bounded convex closed subset of an uniformly convex Banach space X.

Remark 6. In many cases Ag — topologies are not the relativized weak or weak — * to­

pologies in K. For example see a unit ball in Lp(0,1) for p>l and p#:2 ([20]). It isn’t even known whether an Ag - topology is a T2 — topology (Hausdorff topology).

In this part of the paper we shall give some fixed point theorems for nonexpansive mappings.

Theorem 3. Let K be a nonempty sequentia ly A - compact subset of a Banach space X and let T-.K-rtt be a nonexpansive mapping, where it denotes the family of nonempty compact subsets ofX, equipped w th the Hausdorff metric. IfT is an inward mapping, i.e.

TxCIgx for xEK, and there exists a sequence [xt]&KN such that dist (x,-, Tx,)->-0, then i

Fixr=[xeAS:xerx]=?t0. If addditionally X isu.c.e.d. the condition ‘TxCIgx for each x&K’may be replaced by the condition ‘TxCIg(x) for each x&K’.

This result may be proved by an approach due to K. Goebel [9] (see also [3], [17], [18], [19]).

(5)

Exemple 1.Suppose [a,], [ft,] are bounded sequence of positive numbers, infa,->0 and i

di<Jbj for 1=1,2,... . Chose two points/j=a,-e,-, gj=bjej in each ‘axis’ and define K-

=conv[/j„g,-],-ejy. This/f is not weak —* compact. Simply calculations show that for weak

—* convergent [x,] tox

X(/f, [x, ]) = Proj^ x where Projx x = [/G/C: || y — x || = inf ||z-x||l ze*

Then ProjtfX consists of exactly one point iff there exists exactly one index/, such that

^■=mina,-.

i

Choosing properly four sequences [a,], [aj], [ft,], [ft/] such that a,<aj<ftj<ft,- (/=1,2,...), we may construct, in a similar way, two sets K', K that K' C.K and K' is sequentially A — compact, while K is not or vice versa. It explains statements given in remark 1,2,4. Re­

peated this constructions infinitely many times we may also construct the sequence of sets [K,]([£,]) with the following properties:

a) each Kj(Lj) is nonempty closed and convex, b) (L,OL,-+t) for/=1,2,...,

c) U^=A?(nL,=L#=0),

t i

d) Kj(Lj) has a fixed point property for nonexpansive mappings (f.p.p.) for/=l,3,5,..., and £,(£,,) has not f.p.p. for/'=2,4,...,

e) for each e>0 there exists and such that//(/C,/Q)<e (//(£., L,)<e), where H denotes the Hausdorff metric,

f) K(L) has f.p.p. (the point// may be replaced by/’/K(L) has not f.p.p.).

Definition 2 [21 J. Let K be a nonempty subset of a Banach space X and T■.K^K.The mapping T is called asymptotically regular if

lim||rf*lx-r'x||=0 i

for eachxGX.

Theorem 4. If K is a nonempty sequentially A —compact subset of a Banach space X and T-.K-'K is a nonexpansive asymptotically regular mapping, then for each x [T'xja/- ntost converges to some fixed point.

Corollary 2. If K is a nonempty convex sequentially A -compact subset of a Banach space X and T :K-*K is nonexpansive, then for each 0<a<l,and each xdK a sequence

[~>Lx] (Sa=a7’+(1— o)Id) is almost convergent to a fixed point of T.

Proof. Sa is nonexpansive and asymptotically regular [13].

(6)

Example 2. Let X=/‘, A=[x=[ft]G/1 :||x||<l, ^>0 for *=1,2,...J rx=r([f*])=

=lP.£i .fc,... ] and Sia = l/2(7'+Id). Then e, ] is w-* convergent to 0 and 115^ q ||=1 forf= 1,2,....

Example 3. Let X=ll, a>Q, ft=et, fi=(l+a)ej for i>2 and /T=conv[^]. If 73r=

=HU* ])■[$»,0,$a,$3> ••• ] forxGKand S1/2 = l/2(r+Id),then [SiZ2/2] almost convergens to/j and l|S[z2/21|=1 +0 for each i

Remark 7. In theorem 4 the assumption ‘K is sequentially .4 -compact’ may be replac­

ed by the following assumptions: [T'x] is bounded for some x&K and from each bound­

ed sequence [x,] in A we may choose an almost convergent in A' subsequence [x,„]. Some other generalizations are related to so called normal Mann iteration process for T (see [6], [7], [13], [16], 120], [21], [22]).

Finally we will be concerned with methods of constructions of some sequentially A — compact sets. If we have a countably family of Banach spaces [(A7, llll/)] and p>l, /P(A/)=X will signify a Banach space of all sequences x=(xz) such that xl belongs to Ay for each I and

||x|| = [S ( Hx7 ||/)P]1,P < + °o.

Z-i

Let Ki be a nonempty subset of x/ (/=1,2,...). We define K = n Ki n X and we always /«i

assume that K ± 0. Let [x,] = [(x{)] be a bounded sequence in X. Then we can obtain the following lemma.

Lemma 8. [x,] « almost convergent in K iff each [x{],Gyy is almost convergent in fy.

A proof depends upon two facts:

1) if each [x{]/Gjy is almost convergent toxz inA^, thenx = (x/)G X,

2) if each of [*/J/Gjy (/= 1>2,...) and[x,] is regular in Kj orK(respectively),y = (F^G GA\[x] and there exist the following limits: lim ||x—X/||, lim ||p-x, ||, lim ||xz-x{||/, lim ||/-x{||;(/ = 1,2,...) and

“""J*^** then lim lip-x || = [2 rP(3'/. [*5]/eyy) +

+1"" Hm £ (|| x' ||, /]>" > [2 rP (x'. [ x‘ ]. G N )+ + lim lim £ ( llxj. II.)*’!1'7’= lim ||x-x. ||.

(7)

Corollary 3. K is sequentially A -compact iff every Ki is sequentially A -compact and (diam K[)p < + <».

Let us choose a function G : R™ -> R+ (R+ = [f €R : t > 0]) such that

1.

2. aeR (t‘,...,tm)£Rm ~ aG(t > ••• > I )

3. (,......sm<tm)~G(s'...sm)<G(f1...fm)]

(**...r'w)eJ?«

4- (f...tm}eRm + tl...s'" + tm)<G(sl.../”) 4- G(f‘,..., H”) (»*...s^eR?

Then in a product of a Banach spaces (X,,|| ||,), ...,(Xm, || ||m) we may introduce a new norm

llx|lc=G(ll**ll1,...,U*Mllm) fotx = (x‘,..., xm)eX = II xl.m

Z»i

Lemma 9. If each K/ (Z = 1,... ,m) is a nonempty subset of Xj and each sequence (I = I,... ,m) is regular in Ki, then a sequence [xj ■ [(xj,..., xj”)]fc regular in

m m i

A = n AT, C X. rK ([x,]) = G{rKi ([X* rKm (Pf ])) and n A (K/, [x']) C A (K, [x,]>

/«1 /el

V in place of 3 there is a condition

(8)

3' (r*...

A

t (?...

I [(s* <t1, ..., sm <tm)/\(s\ ..., sm)*(t'...r'")]^

If G satisfies conditions 2, 3’, 4, then we have the following corollaries.

Corollary 4. A sequence [x,] is almost convergent to x = (x1,, xm) in K iff each

Corollary 5. K is sequentially A -compact iff Ki is sequentially A -compact for 1, 2, ..., m.

Using the last corollary we may construct an example of a sequentially A —compact set K with nonempty its interior in a Banach space X, which is neither u.c.e.d. nor Opial space with respect to weak-* convergence.

Example 4. Let X = 1/(0,1) X ll(p > l,p ¥= 2) with the norm !l(x,y)|| = (||x|||p+

+ IIy lip )lfl. Let A' = A£p X Ap , where A£p, Ap are closed unit balls in Lp (0,1) and /’

respectively. Then A is sequentially?! — compact.

Acknowledgement. The author wishes to thank Professor Kazimierz Goebel for his help and suggestions.

REFERENCES

[1] Calder, J. R., Coleman, W. P., Harris, R. L., Centers of in inite bounded dets in a normed space. Canad. J. Math., 25 (1973), 986-999.

[2] Day, M. M., James, R. C., Swaminanthan, S., Normed linear spaces that are uniformly con­

vex in every directions, Canad. J. Math., 23 (1971). 1051-1059.

[3] Downing, D„ Kirk, W. A., Fixed point theorems for set-valued mappings in metric and Banach spaces. Math. Japon., 22 (1977), 99-112.

[4] Edelstein, M., The construction of an asymptotic center with a fixed-point properly, Bull.

Amer. Math. Soc., 78 (1972), 206-208.

(9)

[5J Engelking, R., Topologia ogólna, PWN Warszawa 1975.

[6] Engl, H. W., Weak convergence of asymptotically regular sequences for nonexpansive mappings and connections with certain Chebyshefcenters, Nonlinear Analysis, 1 (1977), 495-501.

[7) ---, Weak convergence of Mann Iteration for nonexpansive mappings without convexity assumptions. Boll. Un. Mat. Ital., (to appear).

[81

[9] Goebel, K., On a fixed point theorem for multivalued nonexpansive mappings, Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sect. A 29 (1975), 69-72.

(10)---, Kuczumow, T.. Irregular convex sets with fixed point property for nonexpansive mapp­

ings, Colloq Math., (to appear).

(11J Gossez, J. P., Lami Dozo, E., Some geometric properties related to the fixed point theory for nonexpansive mappings, Pacific J. Math., 40 (1972), 565-573.

[12] Halpern, B., Fixed point theorems for outward maps. Ph. D. Thesis U.C.L.A., 1965.

[13] Ishikawa, S., Fixed points and iteration of a nonexpansive mapping in a Banach space, Proc.

Amer Math. Soc„ 59(1976), 65-71.

[14] Karlowitz, L. A., On nonexpansive mappings, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 55 (1976), 321-325.

[15]

[161

[17] Lami Dozo, E., Multivalued nonexpansive mappings and Opial’s condition, Proc. Amer. Math.

Soc., 38(1973), 286-292.

[18] Lim, T. C., A fixed point theorem for multivalued nonexpansive mappings in a uniformly convex Banach space, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 80 (1974), 1123-1126.

[19] ---, Remarks on some fixed point theorems, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 60 (1976), 179-182.

[20] Opial, Z., Weak convergence of the sequence of succesive approximations for nonexpansive mappings. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 73 (1967), 591-597.

[21] ---, Lecture notes on nonexpansive and monotone mappings in Banach spaces, Center for Dy­

namical Systems, Brown University Providence. R.I. USA 1967.

[22] Schaefer, H., Über die Methode sukzessiver Approximationen, Iber. Deutsch. Math. Verein., 59 (1957), 131-140.

123] Zizler, V., On some rotundity and smoothness properties of Banach spaces, Dissertationes Math., L XXX VII.

STRESZCZENIE

W pracy zdefiniowano nową rodzinę zbiorów mających własność punktu stałego dla wielowartościowych operacji nieoddalających.

(10)

РЕЗЮМЕ

В работе определено новое семейство множеств имеющих принцип неподвижной точки для многозначных слабосжимающих отображений.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

We present a stability theorem of Ulam–Hyers type for K-convex set-valued functions, and prove that a set-valued function is K-convex if and only if it is K-midconvex

It is proved that a doubly stochastic operator P is weakly asymptotically cyclic if it almost overlaps supports1. If moreover P is Frobenius–Perron or Harris then it is

We consider a general case where the spectral measure is assumed to be the sum of an absolutely continuous measure, a discrete measure of finite order and a finite number of

Petrus showed that if D is a 2- cell, then there exists a Whitney level A in C(D) which is not contractible, in fact A has non-trivial fundamental group and non-trivial first

To generalise the Fox fundamental trope or the Artin–Mazur fundamental pro-group of a space we consider a fun- damental pro-groupoid π crs(X) and a category pro(π crs(X), Sets) which

Let us now recall the notion of α-proper forcing for a countable ordinal α saying that, given an ∈-chain of length α of countable elementary sum- bodels of some large enough structure

Given the central role played by G δ -diagonals in metrization theory for compact Hausdorff spaces and for linearly ordered spaces (see [S] and [L1], for example), it is natural to

We shall now give another criterion in which we weaken the assumption on the boundary of the domain at the cost of strengthening the assumption on the mapping2. Let D ⊂ C n be a