• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Severe aortic regurgitation due to a Lunderquist Extra-Stiff Wire Guide during transcatheter aortic valve implantation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Severe aortic regurgitation due to a Lunderquist Extra-Stiff Wire Guide during transcatheter aortic valve implantation"

Copied!
2
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Address for correspondence: Azeem Latib, MD, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy, tel: +390226437331, fax: +390226437339, e-mail: alatib@gmail.com

Received: 10.05.2018 Accepted: 18.06.2018

INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY

Cardiology Journal 2018, Vol. 25, No. 5, 642–643

DOI: 10.5603/CJ.2018.0129 Copyright © 2018 Via Medica

ISSN 1897–5593

642 www.cardiologyjournal.org

IMAGE IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE

Severe aortic regurgitation due to

a Lunderquist Extra-Stiff Wire Guide during transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Daisuke Hachinohe

1, 2, 3

, Marco B. Ancona

1

, Antonio Colombo

1, 2

, Azeem Latib

1, 2

1Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy

2Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy

3Cardiology Department, Sapporo Heart Center, Sapporo Cardio Vascular Clinic, Sapporo, Japan

An 85-year-old female with severe aortic ste- nosis was referred for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Initial aortography showed trivial aortic regurgitation (AR) (Fig. 1A, Suppl. Video 1). After insertion of a Lunderquist Extra-Stiff Wire Guide (LES; Cook Inc., USA) into left ventricle, blood pressure decreased gradually to 60 mmHg, unresponsive to catecholamines.

There was no evidence of left ventricular perfora- tion, exacerbation of mitral regurgitation, or pe- ripheral artery perforation. Aortography revealed severe AR and immobile right coronary leaflet (Fig. 1B, Suppl. Video 2). After removal of LES and switching to a pigtail catheter, vitals and AR improved immediately (Fig. 1C, Suppl. Video 3).

Finally, a 29 mm Portico (St. Jude Medical, Inc.,

USA) was implanted with Safari wire (Boston Sci- entific, USA) (Fig. 1D).

Guidewires with moderate stiffness compared to LES tend to go in line with a patient’s anatomy and pass toward non-coronary cusp and settle within the commissure between right-coronary and non-coronary cusp. In this case, LES might have blocked the right coronary leaflet, leading to severe AR. LES, which has more than double the stiffness than other guidewires, tends to remain straight rather than along a patient’s anatomy and may be more likely to go toward right-coronary cusp (Fig. 1E, F). When using an LES, efforts to exclude severe AR if patient vitals deteriorate is important in preventing disastrous complications.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Azeem Latib is a consult- ant for Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the con- tents of this paper to disclose.

(2)

www.cardiologyjournal.org 643 Daisuke Hachinohe et al., Severe AR due to Lunderquist Extra-Stiff Wire Guide

Figure 1. Aortography during transcatheter aortic valve implantation and computed tomography (CT) reconstruc- tion (A) Initial aortography shows trivial aortic regurgitation (AR) (Suppl. Video 1). B. Aortography after insertion of a Lunderquist Extra-Stiff Wire Guide in left ventricle (LV) reveals severe AR and immobile right coronary leaflet (Suppl. Video 2). C. Immediately after removal of the Lunderquist wire from LV, aortography shows improvement of AR (Suppl. Video 3). D. Final aortography shows an excellent result. Three-dimensional CT reconstruction of right anterior oblique projection (E) and anterior-posterior projection (F). Green solid lines indicate the Lunderquist wire position, going straight rather than being along the patient’s anatomy. Blue dotted lines demonstrate the expected position of the other guidewires, passing toward non-coronary cusp (NCC); LCC — left-coronary cusp; RCC — right- -coronary cusp.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Macroscopic findings showing the anterior mitral leaflet (AML) was injured by mechanical stimulation from the bottom of implanted valve (arrow);D. Microscopic findings showing

1) Sustained hemodynamic changes are observed as peak velocity and transvalvular gradient dif- ferences between discharge and follow-up within 1 year after the procedure; 2) BAV

Computed tomography (CT) before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): CT showed calcific atheromatous changes in the aortic valve and calcification in the ostial segment

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and hybrid coronary revascularization in a patient with severe aortic stenosis, complex coronary artery dis- ease, and porcelain aorta..

C – a transesophageal echocardiographic 4‑chamber view demonstrating severe aortic regurgitation; D – computed tomography of coronary vessels and the dilated ascending

tic stenosis (mean gradient, 80 mm Hg; aortic valve area, 0.7 cm 2 ) and left ventricular ejec‑A. tion fraction

This is the first study to compare the use of direct left ventricular wire pacing and the conventional method (right ventricular lead pacing) in the population of unselected

High implantation of Evolut R bioprosthesis in our patient was intentional to avoid interference with previously implanted mitral prosthesis and unintentionally caused a too