• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

First implantation of a HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device in Poland

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "First implantation of a HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device in Poland"

Copied!
1
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

www.kardiologiapolska.pl

Kardiologia Polska 2016; 74, 9: 1028; DOI: 10.5603/KP.2016.0124 ISSN 0022–9032

Studium przypadku / CliniCal Vignette

Address for correspondence:

Paweł Litwiński, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiosurgery and Transplantology, The Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski Institute of Cardiology, ul. Alpejska 42, 04–628 Warszawa, Poland, e-mail: open4cor@gmail.com

Conflict of interest: P. Litwiński, M. Jasińska, J. Szymański, M. Kuśmierczyk — participants of the post-market international Elevate HM3 Registry

— the purpose of this post-market registry is to collect data and evaluate the real-world experience of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist system in a post-approval setting.

Kardiologia Polska Copyright © Polskie Towarzystwo Kardiologiczne 2016

First implantation of a HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device in Poland

Pierwsza w Polsce implantacja urządzenia do wspomagania lewej komory serca typu HeartMate 3

Paweł Litwiński, Piotr Kołsut, Małgorzata Jasińska, Jarosław Szymański, Mariusz Kuśmierczyk

Department of Cardiosurgery and Transplantology, The Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

An estimated 2–3% of the total European population suffer from heart failure (HF). The size of the population that fulfils the definition of advanced HF may exceed 60 thousand patients. Between them 10–15 thousand meet the criteria for cardiac transplantation or mechanical circulatory support devices. The gold standard for management of advanced HF is cardiac transplantation (HTX), but because of the scarcity of donor organs it cannot alone address the global epi- demic of HF. As a consequence, alternate treatment options have been used, such as chronic mechanical circulatory support (MCS). In 2014, only 76 HTXs were performed throughout Poland, and 16% (n = 90) of patients died whilst on the waiting list for a heart transplant. Nowadays approximately 90% of patients being considered for MCS receive a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to transplantation or destination therapy for those deemed transplant ineligible. Data from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry show that up to 41% of all patients undergo transplantation with an LVAD in place. More widespread adoption of ventricular assist device (VAD) technology has resulted in a 2500% increase in LVAD implants in

the last eight years. Actuarial survival at one and two years following continuous-flow LVAD implantation has reached 80% and 70%, re- spectively. The majority of patients discharged home following VAD implantation can achieve a modicum of independent living. Decisions about candidacy for transplantation or MCS should be made by an experienced, multidisciplinary team. The HeartMate 3 LVAD (Fig. 1) is a new compact, intrapericardial, centrifugal-flow pump with a full magnetically levitated rotor and a wide range of operation (2–10 L/min) to accommodate a broad range of clinical needs. It generates lower power consumption and is designed to minimise the following: sheer stress and stasis, haemolysis, effects on von Willebrand factor and platelet activation. The Full MagLev technology enables rapid speed changes and allows the development of artificial pulsatile flow. The HeartMate 3 CE Mark Study was the first human experience with this LVAD. It demonstrated exceptional 30-day (98%) and six-month (92%) patient survival, no incidence of pump thrombosis, haemolysis, pump malfunction, or exchange at 30 days and 180 days, progressive sus- tained quality of life improvements, and a significant reduction in HF symptoms at six months. The pump was successfully implanted through a median sternotomy in a 41-year-old man with the diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy post myocarditis with frequent hospitalisations for HF and New York Heart Association IIIb/IV functional limitations despite optimal medical therapy. He was classified as Intermacs profile 4. The cardiac index was 1.43 L/min/m², and the left ventricular ejection frac- tion was from 10% to 12%. The postoperative period was complicated by transient right ventricular failure and renal insufficiency without need for dialysis. The patient was discharged home on postoperative

day 26 with significant improvement in HF symptoms. Figure 1. The HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

The Randomised Evaluation of Mechanical Assist- ance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Fail- ure (REMATCH) trial compared medical treatment with the electrically driven

We suggest that insertion of a bare -metal stent in the case of LVAD outflow graft twisting is an attractive and less invasive treatment option when compared with surgi-

Coronary angiography revealed heavy calcifications in both coronary arteries, a proximally occluded right coronary artery, as well as critical stenosis of the distal left

Finally, based on the site of sup- port, MCS devices can be divided into left ventricular assist device (LVAD), in which the pump supports the left ventricle, right ventricular

Right ventricular failure was observed in nine (27.3%) patients and was similarly distributed in patients grouped ac- cording to HF aetiology and INTERMACS.. Hospitalisation due to

Effective strategy of rescue treatment for acute pump thrombosis after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with high risk of bleeding complications. This proposed

Hybrid ablation of haemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia using a transabdominal minimally-invasive approach and percutaneous left ventricular assist device..

The heart team decided that high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with rotational atherectomy optimally with left ventricle assist device (LVAD) is the best