• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

INSTRUMENTATION & DETECTORS for HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS I

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "INSTRUMENTATION & DETECTORS for HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS I"

Copied!
61
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

28th June-4th July 2017 Isabelle Wingerter-Seez (LAPP-CNRS) - CERN Summer Students Program

INSTRUMENTATION

&

DETECTORS for

HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS I

1

(2)

28th June-4th July 2017 Isabelle Wingerter-Seez (LAPP-CNRS) - CERN Summer Students Program

TODAY

INTRODUCTION

2

(3)

28th June-4th July 2017

WHAT IS A PARTICLE DETECTOR ?

An apparatus able to

detect the passage of a particle and/or localise it

and/or measure its momentum or energy and/or identify its nature

and/or measure its time of arrival

…..

3

(4)

28th June-4th July 2017

WHY DO WE NEED PARTICLE DETECTORS ?

An astronomer uses a telescope A biologist uses a microscope

We (a lot of us at least) use a camera to take a snapshot of reality

Particle physicists invent, build and operate detectors to record the products of initial particles interactions:

4

Initial state

KNOWN Interaction

?

Final state UNKNOWN

DETECTOR

to record the final state for physicists to interpret the nature of

the interaction

(5)

28th June-4th July 2017

WHAT ARE WE LOOKING FOR ?

5

(6)

28th June-4th July 2017

ELEMENTARY PARTICLES and FORCES

6

(7)

28th June-4th July 2017

PARTICLES

7

(8)

28th June-4th July 2017

PARTICLES

7

(9)

28th June-4th July 2017 8

H,

+ the ones we have not yet observed

(10)

28th June-4th July 2017

KNOWN PARTICLES

HOW CAN A PARTICLE DETECTOR

DISTINGUISH

THE PARTICLES WE KNOW

MEASURE PROPERTIES of PHYSICS PROCESSES

IDENTIFY THE EXISTENCE 
 OF A NEW PARTICLE

?

9

H,

+ the ones we have not yet observed

(11)

28th June-4th July 2017

ELEMENTARY PARTICLES MASS

10

Mass of elementary particles in not

predicted by the Standard Model of

Particle Physics.

(12)

28th June-4th July 2017

PARTICLES MASSES

11

Tables of masses for known particles

(here baryons - 3 quarks)

(13)

28th June-4th July 2017

PROPERTIES of PARTICULES

12

Ta b l e s o f d e c a y modes for known particles

(here for lepton τ)

(14)

28th June-4th July 2017

LIMITED SIZE DETECTOR

Among these 180 listed particles,

27 have a long enough lifetime

such that, for GeV energies, they travel more than one micrometer

Among these 27,

14 have c.τ <0.5 mm and leave a very short track in the detector

13

(15)

28th June-4th July 2017

THE 13 PARTICLES A DETECTOR MUST BE ABLE TO MEASURE AND IDENTIFY

14

(16)

28th June-4th July 2017

UNITS in HEP & International System

15

(17)

28th June-4th July 2017

HOW to MEASURE PARTICLE PROPERTIES

16

(18)

28th June-4th July 2017

EXAMPLES of INTERACTIONS

17

Ionisation Production de paires e + e -

Diffusion

Compton

(19)

28th June-4th July 2017

RADIATION LENGTH

18

E 0

1X 0

0,37 E 0

1

3

2

The radiation length is a “universal” distance, very useful to describe electromagnetic showers (electrons & photons)

X 0 is the distance after which the incident electron has radiated (1-1/e) 63% of

its incident energy, via Bremsstrahlung.

(20)

28th June-4th July 2017

TOTAL ENERGY LOSS by ELECTRONS

19

(21)

28th June-4th July 2017

µ + in COPPER

20

(22)

28th June-4th July 2017

PROTON-PROTON INTERACTIONS

21

x

y

θ z φ

p T p

proton 1 proton 2

η=-ln tan(θ/2) p p1 +p p2 =0

√s=E p1 +E p2 → √s dure =E parton1 +E parton2

M 12 =√[2E 1 .E 2 (1-cosα 12 )]

(23)

28th June-4th July 2017

PROTON-PROTON INTERACTIONS

21

x

y

θ z φ

p T p

proton 1 proton 2

η=-ln tan(θ/2) p p1 +p p2 =0

√s=E p1 +E p2 → √s dure =E parton1 +E parton2

M 12 =√[2E 1 .E 2 (1-cosα 12 )]

(24)

28th June-4th July 2017 22

(25)

28th June-4th July 2017

DETECTOR at LHC - Challenge

23

40 millions beam crossing/s

1 billion collisions/s

(26)

28th June-4th July 2017

DETECTOR: PRINCIPLE

24

(27)

28th June-4th July 2017

DETECTORS: TRACKING

25

1X 0 >30X 0 2X 0 ~ qques X 0

(28)

28th June-4th July 2017

MAGNETIC ANALYSIS

26

(29)

28th June-4th July 2017

MAGNETIC ANALYSIS

27

Charged particle of momentum p in a magnetic field B

If the field is constant and we neglect the presence of matter, the momentum is constant with time, the trajectory is helical.

l

(30)

28th June-4th July 2017 28

What can you say

about this event ?

(31)

28th June-4th July 2017

ATLAS TRACKING SYSTEM

Detector SCT 60 m

2

- 6 M channels

Barrel 4 cylindres at R=300, 373, 447 & 520 mm Forward 9 disks on each side

~4000 modules

Cell width 80 µm ⟹ σ

pos

= 23 µm 8 points per trace

29

B

Pixels detector 1.7 m

2

- 80 M de canaux

1744 pixel modules avec 46080 pixels/mod.

Each cell : 50x400 µm

2

⟹ σ

pos

=14/115 µm

Barrel R= 33.6, 50.5, 88.5 & 122.5 mm

Forward R coverage 9-15 cm

(32)

28th June-4th July 2017

TRACKING DETECTOR: CMS pixel module

30

10 µm

(33)

28th June-4th July 2017

TRACKING DETECTOR: ATLAS pixel module

31

(34)

28th June-4th July 2017

CONNECTION SENSOR-ELECTRONICS

32

Connection between the silicium sensor and the reluctancies chip readout Very high density ~15 wires/mm

Connection via ultrasounds of wires of thickness ~20µm

(35)

28th June-4th July 2017

TRACKING DETECTOR: new PIXEL layer installed in 2014 at R=3.3 cm

33

(36)

28th June-4th July 2017 34

(37)

28th June-4th July 2017

Barrel 4 cylinders at R=300, 373, 447 & 520 mm (r-φ & z precision coordinates)

Endcap 9 disks on each side

~4000 modules

Each strip has 80 µm pitch ⟹ σ pos = 23 µm 8 points per track

35

(38)

28th June-4th July 2017

PILE-UP of COLLISIONS

Multi-collisions per beam crossing

36

10 11 protons/bunch 10 11 protons/bunch

Ability to separate individual collisions - 40 MHz

Χ 10-20..50

(39)

28th June-4th July 2017

TRACKING DETECTOR

Measure charged particles momentum Uniform magnetic field

High position resolution ⟶ high momentum resolution

Close to the beams

⟶ high particle density

⟶ small cell size

37

(40)

28th June-4th July 2017

DETECTOR: CALORIMETERS

38

(41)

28th June-4th July 2017

INTERACTIONS vs INCOMING PARTICLES

39

C A L O R I M E T E R S A R E DESTRUCTIVE

PARTICLES DO NOT COME OUT of THE CALORIMETER

E L E C T R O N S , P H O T O N S , HADRONS

A R E A B S O R B E D b y t h e CALORIMETERS

ONLY MUONS and NEUTRINOS

ESCAPE

(42)

28th June-4th July 2017

EXAMPLES of INTERACTIONS

40

Ionisation Production de paires e + e -

Diffusion

Compton

(43)

28th June-4th July 2017

ELECTROMAGNETIC SHOWER

41

e - / e + E e <E c e - / e + E e >E c

photon

(44)

28th June-4th July 2017

The CAVERN has a FINITE SIZE

42

(45)

28th June-4th July 2017

CALORIMETERS measure PARTICLE ENERGY

43

Module 400 crystals

75k channels

ΔE/E ~ 3-5%/√E ⊕ 150 MeV/E ⊕ 0.5%

~ 30 cm

(46)

28th June-4th July 2017

CONSTRUCTION of the CMS CALORIMETER

44

Submodule 2x5 crystals

Supermodule 1700 crytsals

Total 36 Supermodules

Module

400 crystals

(47)

28th June-4th July 2017

CONSTRUCTION du CALORIMETRE de CMS

45

Jul 2007

(48)

28th June-4th July 2017

DETECTEURS: SPECTROMETRE à MUONS

46

(49)

28th June-4th July 2017

MUONS

µ is the brother of the electron with m µ =200 x me Electromagnetic interaction: 1/m 2

µ interact with matter 40000 times less than electrons

They essentially do not notice the presence of the calorimeter Detection with the muon spectrometer

47

(50)

28th June-4th July 2017

AIR CORE TOROID

48

(51)

28th June-4th July 2017

Text

49

(52)

28th June-4th July 2017

MUON SPECTROMETER

50

Magnetic field: air core toroïd

44 m 25 m

(53)

28th June-4th July 2017

MUON SPECTROMETER

51

(54)

28th June-4th July 2017

MUON SPECTROMETER

52

+ straight tracks

sagitta

→ ~40µm B

~5 m

Specific to ATLAS : Air core Toroïd

Minimise matter encounter by muons WHY ???

p T <100 GeV δp T /p T ~2%

p T ~1 TeV δp T /p T ~10%

(55)

28th June-4th July 2017 53

(56)

28th June-4th July 2017

MUON CHAMBERS in ATLAS

54

(57)

28th June-4th July 2017

TOROID + MUON CHAMBERS

55

(58)

28th June-4th July 2017

DETECTOR MISSING TRANSVERSE ENERGY

56

(59)

28th June-4th July 2017

ENERGY BALANCE

57

(60)

28th June-4th July 2017

DETECTOR: INTRODUCTION QUIZZ

What is a detector ?

What does a detector measure ?

How is a detector designed ?

Compare a digital camera with the ATLAS detector

Would you join an experiment where the calorimeter is in front of the tracking system ?

58

(61)

28th June-4th July 2017

CREDIT and BIBLIOGRAPHY

A lot of material in these lectures are from:

Daniel Fournier @ EDIT2011 Marco Delmastro @ ESIPAP 2014 Weiner Raigler @ AEPSHEP2013

Hans Christian Schultz-Coulon’s lectures Carsten Niebuhr’s lectures [1][2][3]

Georg Streinbrueck’s lecture Pippa Wells @ EDIT2011

Jérôme Baudot @ ESIPAP2014

59

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

In fact, even if a velocity equal to the second cosmic velocity were impressed to a body of the solar system, it would not be able to go till the innite because it would enter

In irreversible and reversible processes running from the state 1 to the state 2 according to the rst law of thermodynamics the change of energy takes place. dU = dQ nieodwr +

Electrostatics Electromagnetic eld Maxwell equations EM elds independent on time. EM elds independent

Huygens stated that an expanding sphere of light behaves as if each point on the wave front were a new source of radiation of the same frequency and phase.. However his health

Detectors for high energy physics (ATLAS at

Solid state detectors provide very high precision tracking in particle physics experiments (down to 5 µm) for vertex measurement but also for momentum

The uncertainty on the current to energy conversion factor (see Section 5.4) of the PS has been studied using the w 2 -distribution of the visible energy distribution for data and

Lion Cub – a physics competition for junior high and high school students.. Piotr Goldstein,