• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

On a boundary value problem

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "On a boundary value problem"

Copied!
5
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Śląskiego nr 1399

O N A B O U N D A R Y V A L U E P R O B L E M

J Ó Z E F KALINOWSKI

A b s t r a c t . The equation x"(t) = /(t, i(a(<)), for t € [a, b], where the functions a,/? deviated argument of type [a,b] —• [a,b] is considered.

A sufficient condition for existence of the end b of the interval [a, 6], such that there exists the solution x of the above equation on [a,b] fulfilling the boundary value conditions x(a) = A, x(b) = B and ||r'(a)|| = v > 0, where the constants o, v and vectors A , B are given, is proved.

Let D := [a, b] be an interval and d:=b-a denote length of this interval.

Let the symbol || • || denote a norm in the space 1 " .

Consider a system of ordinary differential equations of the second order with a deviating argument of the form

Let us denote Di := D x l n x l n . We assume that the function / : Di -> mn is a continuous real function and fulfils the Lipschitz con­

dition of the form

(2) \\f(t,x,y)-f(t,x,y)\\<p\\x-x\\+q\\y-y\\ for t € D, where p, q > 0 are constants. The function / is bounded on the domain Dx,

(1) x"(t) = f(t,x(a(t)),x'(/3(t))), teD.

i.e.

(3) II / ( - , v ) ||<Jf.

Received December 11, 1990.

A M S (1991) subject classification: Primary 34K10. Secondary 34B15.

(2)

a,/3:D—>D, functions of deviation of the argument, are continuous and a < a(t) <t,a< f3{t) < t.

We consider boundary value conditions for the system (1)

(4) x(a) = A, x(b) = B and

(5) || x'(a) ||= *,

where vectors A, B € WLn and the constant v > 0 are given. The right end 6 of the interval D is unknown.

In this paper the existence of the right end 6 of the interval D and the solution x of the problem (1), (4), (5) on D will be proved.

In particular case, for equation

x"(t) = g(x(t)), t e D

the similar problem was consider in the paper [3].

We will, prove the following theorem:

T H E O R E M . Let the function f satisfy assumptions (2) and (3). Let us assume that

{

h(di) for di < di h(d2) for d\ > d2,

where

and

h(d):=±\\B-A\\+^-d, d>0

d2 : _ y/g*+2p-q

and

(7) ^d2p + dq<l.

(3)

If the vectors A and B satisfy the relation

(8) A± B

then there exists the interval D and the solution x of the problem (1), (4), (5) on D.

P R O O F . From the results of the papers [1], [2] and the assumptions (2) and (7) we obtain existence and uniqueness of the solution of the problem (1), (4) on D, where b > a and 6 is a parameter. From uniqueness of the solution it follows that the formula of the solution may be presented in the form

t p a

(9) x(t) = J Jf(z,x(a(z)),x'(P(z)))dz ds + Mb-(t-a) + A,

for t € D. From (9) it follows for t = b that the vector Mb € IRn is defined by formula

(10) Mb = li(B-A)- £[J° f(z,x(a(z)),x'(P(z)))d2

Differentiating each side of the equation (9) with respect to the variable t we obtain

(11) z'(t)= f f(z,x(a(z)),x'(/3(z)))dz + Mb, t e D.

J a

Using (10), the triangle inequality, the assumption (3) and properties of integrals we obtain

Mb | | < i | | | B - A || + [ [ [ II / ( * , * ( « ( * ) ) , x % % ) ) ) || dz]ds

[jT,

Kdz] d s j = h(d) i.e.

(4)

(12) ||M6||</i(d) for d>0.

From the definition (10) there exists

(13) lim || Mb ||= +oo.

d*-*0+

It follows from the definition of the function h that lim hid) — +oo

d->0+

and formulas (12), (13) are not in contradiction with themselves.

From continuity of the function Mj, for d > 0, from (12) and (13), un- der (8) the norm || Mb || is greather then min h(d). But for satisfying the inequality (7) the argument d must fulfill the inequality d < d2. Let us consider two possible cases:

(1°) dx < d2.

From the definition of the function h

Q^h(d) = h(dl).

(2°) dx > d2. Then

Qm m2M < 0 = h(d2).

From uniqueness of the solution x and from (5) and (11) it follows that the equality

(14) || Mb ||= *

holds. The existence of b follows from (13) and continuity of || Mb ||. Then for v, satisfying the inequality (6) there exist M j defined by (10) and solution x of the form (9) of the problem (1), (4), (5).

This is the end of the proof. •

R E M A R K 1. Theorem is not true without the assumption (8).

(5)

P R O O F . For the problem

x"(t) = 0, x(a) = x(b) = 0, t£D.

there exists the unique constant solution x(t) = 0, t £ D. For all v > 0 the

condition (5) is not fulfilled. •

R E M A R K 2. The analogous theorem is true for the equation (1) with more than two deviations of the argument.

R E F E R E N C E S

[1] J . Kalinowski, Two point boundary value problem for a system of ordinary differential equations of second order with deviating argument, Ann. Polon. Math. 30 (1974), (in Russian) 71-76.

[2] J . Kalinowski, On the convergence of an iterative sequence to the solution of a system of ordinary differential equations with deviated arguments, Demonstratio Math. 9 No 1 (1976), 77-93.

[3] C . A . Vavilov, Solvability a class of boundary value problems, Doki. Akad. Nauk SSSR 305 No 2 (1989), (in Russian) 268-270.

U N I W E R S Y T E T Ś L Ą S K I I N S T Y T U T M A T E M A T Y K I U L . B A N K O W A 14 4 0 - 0 0 7 K A T O W I C E

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Ntouyas, The lower and upper solutions method for first order differential inclusions with nonlinear boundary conditions,

In [4, 6] the authors studied the existence and uniqueness of solutions of classes of functional differential equations with infinite delay and fractional order, and in [3] a class

In [4, 7] the authors studied the existence and uniqueness of solutions of classes of initial value problems for functional differential equations with infinite delay and

P i n i, Un problema di valori al contorno per un’equazione a derivate parziali del terzo ordine con parte principale di tipo

Key words and phrases : boundary value problems, differential equations with deviat- ing arguments, Leray–Schauder degree, a priori bounds, existence theorems, p-Laplaciand.

In accordance with the customary notations in quasiconformal mapping theory let us write p = ∂f /∂z, q = ∂f /∂z for the complex derivatives of f (z) belonging to H, in terms of

A numeri- cal solution of boundary value problems (BVPs) for linear time-varying differential algebraic equations, or DAEs for short, was considered in (Clark and Petzold, 1989), and

We shall give the proof