• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Ventricular pseudoaneurysm rupture – a potentially fatal complication of myocardial infarction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Ventricular pseudoaneurysm rupture – a potentially fatal complication of myocardial infarction"

Copied!
2
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

512 Creative Commons licenses: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY -NC -SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).

Image in intervention

Corresponding author:

Helena Krysztofiak, 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland, e-mail: helenakrysztofiak@gmail.com

Received: 22.03.2020, accepted: 19.05.2020.

Ventricular pseudoaneurysm rupture – a potentially fatal complication of myocardial infarction

Helena Krysztofiak1, Jacek Migaj1, Piotr Buczkowski2, Sebastian Stefaniak2, Ewa Straburzyńska-Migaj1, Marta Kałużna-Oleksy1

11st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

2Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland

Adv Interv Cardiol 2020; 16, 4 (62): 512–513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2020.101781

A 75-year-old hypertensive female patient presented at the cardiac department because of chest pain 20 days earlier. A  suspicion of a  past myocardial infarction (MI) and a  pseudoaneurysm developed after echocardiogra- phy performed in the admissions office. Coronary angiog- raphy showed all vessels patent apart from the occluded left circumflex artery (LCx) (Figure 1 A). Echocardiography showed pseudoaneurysm of the lateral wall of the left ventricle (LV) and small pericardial effusion (Figure 1 B).

Clinical status of the patient was stable. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed to rule out other cardi- ac pathologies – the free heart wall rupture was visual- ized, and consequently left ventricular pseudoaneurysm was confirmed (Figures 1 C, D). There were no abnormal laboratory results, and biomarkers of myocardial necro- sis were negative. The patient was scheduled for urgent cardiac surgery. While waiting for cardiac surgery in the intensive care unit, sudden clinical state worsening was observed with symptoms of cardiogenic shock such as tachycardia (HR 120–130 bpm), blood pressure decrease (BP 65/40 mm Hg) and logic contact impaired. The fol- lowing echocardiographic imaging showed heart tampon- ade (Figure 1 E). The patient was prepared for emergency surgery. EuroSCORE II was calculated as 21.75%. Surgery with arterial cannulation via femoral artery access to facil- itate extracorporeal circulation was performed. The aneu- rysmal sac was cut to some degree over the right atrium to perform vein cannulation. In the next step tamponade was decompressed, showing ruptured pseudoaneurysmal sac size 51 × 39 × 31 mm (Figure 1 F). Cooley’s method was used to close the aneurysm. Clamp time was 39 min and whole extracorporeal circulation time was 79 min.

The patient was discharged from hospital on the 12th day after surgery in a good clinical state.

Despite development of interventional cardiolo- gy and widespread use of endovascular procedures in treatment of acute coronary syndrome, there are still ob- served mechanical complications of myocardial infarc- tion. Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm is a relatively rare complication that is reported in less than 0.1% of all MI patients and the main risk factors are older age, female sex, hypertension and inferior and lateral wall MI [1].

Pseudoaneurysm is formed when cardiac rupture is con- tained by adherent pericardium or scar tissue, in con- trast to true aneurysm which comprises full thickness of the wall [1]. Around 40% of all left ventricular wall ruptures occurred during the first 24 h and 85% with- in the first week [2]. The most common localization of pseudoaneurysm is inferolateral (posterior) wall (43%), lateral wall (28%), then apex (24%) followed by other segments at equal frequency [3]. Symptoms present- ed by patients with left ventricular pseudoaneurysm are varied and not specific, which makes the diagnosis challenging [2]. Both transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography as well as CMR are used in the diag- nostic process and in differentiating pseudoaneurysm from true aneurysm [2].

Most cases of this type of MI complications result in death due to cardiogenic shock because of heart tamponade. Knowing the natural course of acute heart pseudoaneurysm, medical therapy should be initiated urgently. The most effective method of treatment is sur- gical intervention, mostly open heart operation, although percutaneous coil embolization has been reported to be an alternative management in selected patients [4].

Nonetheless, the decision about the operation should be carefully analyzed because of the high surgical mortality rate [2].

(2)

Helena Krysztofiak et al. VSR after acute myocardial infarction

513

Advances in Interventional Cardiology 2020; 16, 4 (62)

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Alapati L, Chitwood WR, Cahill J, et al. Left ventricular pseudoan- eurysm: a case report and review of the literature. World J Clin Cases 2014; 2: 90-3.

2. Avegliano G, Conde D, Ruiz MI, et al. Lateral left ventricular wall rupture following acute myocardial infarction: pathophysiologi- cal interpretation by multimodality imaging approach. Echocar- diography 2014; 31: E296-9.

3. Frances C, Romero A, Grady D. Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm.

J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 557-61.

4. Li Y,  Deng L,  Song Y. Surgical treatment  of huge  left  ventricu- lar  outflow tract  pseudoaneurysm. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2018; 27: 613-4.

Figure 1. A – Coronary angiography showing occlusion of circumflex artery (LCx) in distal part. B – Echocar- diography parasternal short axis-view, color Doppler imaging showing pseudoaneurysm of lateral wall of left ventricle and small pericardium effusion. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging confirmed pseudoan- eurysm. CMR long axis-view (C) and short axis-view (D) showing pseudoaneurysm. E – Because of worsening of clinical status, while waiting for the urgent cardiac surgery, controlled echocardiography was performed, showing heart tamponade. F – Emergency surgery (EuroSCORE II – 21.75%) in extracorporeal circulation with arterial cannulation via femoral artery access was performed. Cooley’s method was used to close the aneurysm

A

B

E

D F

C

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Sensitivities of ECG criteria for LVH were highest when all criteria were applied together (at least 1 ECG­LVH criterion was positive) and Table 4 Electrocardiographic criteria

1 In this study, 57% of pa- tients had decreased LVEF, and their cardiac function was significantly lower than that of healthy controls and patients with preserved LVEF.

C L I N I C A L V I G N E T T E Left ventricular aneurysm and ventricular septal defect after MI 87 ABCDEF FIGURE 1The management and imaging of a giant left ventricular

During the resuscitation, an emergency point-of-care echocardiogram with a handheld device was performed, revealing large pericardial haematoma with cardiac tamponade due to

The patient had MI of the inferior heart wall and was hospitalised in a Scandinavian centre of cardiology, where percutaneous balloon angioplasty of the right coronary artery

W tych przypadkach obserwuje się obszary niedokrwienia lub rozpoczynającej się mar- twicy skóry nad tętniakami oraz zaburzenia unerwienia kończyn górnych będące następstwem

W wykonanym ponow- nie badaniu echokardiograficznym stwierdzono obecność na poziomie segmentu podstawnego ściany dolnej pęknięcia ściany serca sięgającego zewnętrznej

Primary angioplasty reduces the risk of left ventricular free wall rupture compared with thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction.. O’Keefe JH Jr, Bailey WL,