• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Laparoscopic mesh procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse – review of the literature

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Laparoscopic mesh procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse – review of the literature"

Copied!
5
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 950-954. 4 6 % ' )  4 3 + 0 Á ( 3 ; ) ginekolog i a. Laparoscopic mesh procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse – review of the literature Zabiegi laparoskopowe z użyciem materiałów syntetycznych w leczeniu zaburzeń statyki narządu rodnego – przegląd literatury 

(2)  

(3)  

(4)  

(5) 

(6) 

(7) 

(8) 

(9)  

(10)   ! II Katedra i Klinika Ginekologii Operacyjnej Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Lublinie, Polska. Abstract Objectives: The main aim of the article was to describe laparoscopic mesh procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, as well as evaluate their role, outcomes and limitations. Material and methods: In February 2014, online search of English-language literature in PubMed was performed. This paper presents the analysis of reports published over the last decade that included at least 50 patients with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Results: Numerous laparoscopic techniques to restore proper anatomy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse have been described. Laparoscopy provides a number of important advantages, including enhanced visualization of the pelvic anatomy, reduction of adhesion formation, lower morbidity and blood loss, decreased postoperative pain, smaller incision and quicker recovery. Nonetheless, this access is technically more difficult than an open or vaginal surgery due to two-dimensional vision and decreased degrees of freedom. It requires high level of laparoscopic suturing skills and longer operative time, especially at the beginning of the learning curve. Conclusions: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, hysteropexy and lateral suspension are interesting and effective options for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, providing a number of important advantages characteristic for endoscopic techniques.. Key words: pelvic organ prolapse / laparoscopy / sacrocolpopexy / hysteropexy / / laparoscopic lateral suspensione / Streszczenie Cel pracy: Celem pracy jest opis zabiegów laparoskopowych z użyciem materiałów syntetycznych w leczeniu zaburzeń statyki narządu rodnego, ocena ich skuteczności i ograniczeń w stosowaniu. Materiał i metody: W lutym 2014 roku dokonano przeglądu literatury anglojęzycznej dostępnej w bazie PubMed. W poniższej publikacji poddano analizie wyniki badań opublikowanych w ciągu ostatnich 10 lat, przeprowadzonych na grupie co najmniej 50 pacjentek, u których efekt zabiegu został oceniony po minimum 12 miesiącach od operacji. Wyniki: W leczeniu zaburzeń statyki narządu rodnego zostało opisanych wiele technik laparoskopowych. Laparoskopia daje możliwość lepszej wizualizacji struktur anatomicznych, redukuje ilość zrostów oraz dolegliwości bólowych po operacji, zmniejsza utratę krwi i przyczynia się do szybszego powrotu do zdrowia. Ten typ operacji jest jednak trudniejszy od zabiegów pochwowych lub wykonywanych z klasycznego dostępu ze względu na dwuwymiarowe widzenie i ograniczoną swobodę ruchów, jak również wymaga umiejętności laparoskopowego szycia i dłuższego czasu operacji zwłaszcza na początku nauki.. Adres do korespondencji: Krzysztof Gałczyński II Katedra i Klinika Ginekologii, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie, SPSK 4, 20-954 Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, Polska tel. +48 81 72 44 686 e-mail: rechbergt@yahoo.com. 950. Otrzymano: 23.04.2014 Zaakceptowano do druku: 19.06.2014. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. Nr 12/2014.

(11) Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 950-954. 4 6 % ' )  4 3 + 0 Á ( 3 ; ) g i n e kol og i a. Krzysztof Gałczyński et al. Laparoscopic mesh procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse – review of the literature.. Wnioski: Laparoskopowa sakrokolpopeksja, histeropeksja i boczne podwieszenie macicy są interesującymi i skutecznymi metodami leczenia zaburzeń statyki narządu rodnego dającymi przy tym korzyści typowe dla zabiegów endoskopowych.. Słowa kluczowe: 

(12) 

(13)    / laparoskopia / / sakrokolpopeksja / histeropeksja /       /. Introduction " !

(14)  #"

(15) # $%& 

(16)  #

(17) 

(18) ' . '

(19) " # "

(20) ! ()* 

(21) ""  "''+ ,

(22) . #

(23) " 

(24)  '#'!   '

(25) ' '- ' . 

(26)  ./0+ % '  

(27) '

(28)  12*  

(29)  . # 

(30) "

(31)   3/()*   

(32) "

(33)  

(34) ' 

(35) . 4

(36) 

(37) + 5"' #"

(38) #   

(39) #

(40)   " /) 6)*  #

(41)   '

(42) " 

(43)  .60+ 7#'"!

(44) " '.  

(45)  //*  

(46) '  "" '! ! . %  

(47)   $89& .10+ :

(48) "" 6))+))) .   8' ;

(49)  $8;& '!  ! .  #" < .30+  # "    .

(50) !! ./0+ 9  

(51) ' 

(52)   6)()     #

(53) .  8;  #

(54)  % "" 

(55)  

(56) '  32* .6(0+. Population trends in Europe are similar so the number of POP procedures and health care costs may be expected to rise as the ##"

(57) 

(58) !+  #

(59)   > 

(60)  % !  .   '    #" <

(61) '  

(62) !

(63) "

(64) 

(65) .

(66) ' ##  '  

(67) "

(68) ' # 

(69) " "

(70) ''. "

(71) ' 4

(72) "  .20+  #

(73) 

(74) '

(75) ".

(76) ' 

(77) !

(78) " ?   ##

(79) 

(80)   #'!.  

(81) !

(82) " 

(83) "  "

(84) ''

(85) '  

(86)   ' '. .@0+  

(87) !!      

(88) "" 

(89) . #'   % .20+  - #  "

(90) #

(91) #. 

(92) 

(93) !  #" < "

(94) 4

(95)  

(96)  # "'  /AA/. [8]. The laparoscopic approach has been successfully adopted  

(97)  #'   #" # '  .

(98) '

(99) "  

(100) !

(101) "  .20+ D

(102) #

(103) # #'

(104)  .  #

(105) 

(106) '

(107) 

(108) ! "'! 

(109) ' 

(110) "

(111)   . #"

(112) 

(113)  ' 

(114) ' 

(115)  "  '.

(116) ' "' " '

(117) ' ##

(118)  #

(119)  

(120) "" 

(121) '. ?  .@0+ " 

(122)   

(123) "" . ' -" 

(124) 

(125)  #  

(126) !

(127) " ! ' 

(128) '

(129) ". 

(130) ' '

(131) ' '!  '+ :"  ? !. laparoscopic suturing skills and longer operating time, especially

(132)   !!   "

(133) !  .2 G A0+. Objectives  

(134) 

(135)   

(136) " 

(137)   

(138) "

(139)   " . "

(140) #

(141) #   

(142)   #" !

(143)  #"

(144) #

(145) ' . ' 

(146) 

(147) "

(148) " ?  

(149) ' "

(150) +. Material and methods 9 H 

(151)  6)/3 " 

(152)   7!""

(153) !

(154) ! "

(155) . in PubMed was performed using the terms: 

(156)  

(157)  AND laparoscopy+ : 

(158)   

(159) 

(160) "

(161) " "

(162) 

(163) . additional search of the same database was conducted using the following terms 

(164) 

(165)   

(166)     

(167) 

(168)    

(169) 

(170)  

(171) 

(172)    Nr 12/2014. This paper includes an analysis of reports on laparoscopic  #'   

(173)   % # "'  . "

(174)  '

(175) ' 

(176)  ''

(177)   () #

(178)  

(179)  "

(180) 

(181). /6 ""#+. Results 9

(182) ""  '  # "

(183)  !

(184) '! ' . techniques of laparoscopic prolapse repairs, but many of them

(185) 

(186) "' 

(187) "" !# 

(188)  ""#  #'!.  - '

(189) 

(190)  

(191) "

(192)   "!  -

(193) + J

(194) ". ''

(195) "

(196)   ""'!' 

(197) " #

(198) !  -

(199) . of different laparoscopic techniques, with the exception of "

(200) #

(201) # 

(202) "##4 $D;K&   -

(203) ' "! term results were reported in many studies and compared with other techniques.. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is considered to be the most   

(204)  

(205) #

(206) " 

(207) !

(208) " #"

(209) #  "!.  

(210)  #  @G/))*

(211) ' #

(212)  

(213) 

(214)  

(215)   G( /))* ./)0+ : K

(216)   #

(217) ! '  !

(218) ". techniques for the treatment of POP concluded that the procedure "'  "' 

(219)    

(220) " #"

(221) #

(222) ' ##

(223) . '#

(224) 

(225)

(226)  #

(227) '  

(228) # "!

(229)  -4

(230)  .A0+. -4

(231)  

(232)  - #'  /GGA  H' 

(233) .  /A(@ N! #''

(234)  '

(235) "' '#  #. 

(236) 

(237) " "##4 .//0+ 9 /AA1 "

(238) #

(239) # #-4

(240) . ! 

(241) '

(242) " #' 

(243)  - ' ' ./6/10.

(244) '    ? 

(245)   '" '

(246) !. !"!  ''  '-

(247)   #.   

(248) ' ' #"

(249)  

(250)  ./10+ 9'

(251) .  

(252) "##4 

(253)  '#'!   !   "'+. 9 7# D;K  # '  "#

(254)   . #"

(255) # #

(256) ""  ! #

(257)  + 9  8;. and the United Kingdom, this procedure is indicated mostly for 

(258) !

(259) " 

(260) " #"

(261) # ./30+ '

(262) 

(263) 

(264) #' 

(265)     .  D;K 

(266)    '. ./)0+  ##"  D;K 

(267) '   '  ! #. -4

(268)   ##    "'  

(269) "" #''. by the uterosacral ligaments [15]. The procedure usually begins 

(270) 

(271) "    # 

(272) " #

(273) '. 4#  

(274)  "!'

(275) " "!

(276) 

(277)   ""  . promontory, setting aside the right ureter laterally and rectum medially [12]. At this stage, the key to a safe surgery is excellent anatomical knowledge of the presacral and pararectal spaces. The 4 #  ## '   

(278) !

(279) " #

(280)  

(281) !. "

(282) 

(283)  "

(284) '  

(285) !

(286) " #

(287)  

(288) ! "

(289) ''. neck should be performed to prepare a place for the mesh. The # #

(290)      

(291) "" -4'   "

(292) 

(293) . © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. 951.

(294) Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 950-954. 4 6 % ' )  4 3 + 0 Á ( 3 ; ) ginekolog i a. Krzysztof Gałczyński et al. Laparoscopic mesh procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse – review of the literature.. "

(295) ' # #

(296)    4 " 

(297)  #

(298)  .    #"

(299) '   "

(300) ''

(301) ' 

(302)  

(303) !

(304) ". 

(305) ""

(306) ' 

(307) 

(308) '+ 9  #

(309) 

(310)  

(311)  ' . "'  '  

(312)  

(313)  ""

(314)   4

(315) ' -4'. without tension to the anterior longitudinal ligament. Some

(316)  ' 

(317) !

(318) " #

(319)    ' ".

(320) ' "   

(321) "##4+ N . suggest that many of these defects may be caused by traction or '#"

(322)    ## -4

(323)    

(324) "   .   -  

(325) 

(326)  "  

(327) '

(328) " '   . 

(329) 

(330) ''

(331) " 

(332) !

(333) " 

(334)  

(335)   

(336)  ./20+  "

(337) !   121 #

(338)  '!! D;K . #' 

(339) # '   

(340) "+ : 

(341) 

(342) 

(343) !. ""#  /3+2  A2*   #

(344)   

(345) -' . the results of their operation and none of the subjects complained  4

(346) " ' + 

(347)   '

(348) 3* . 

(349)   #"

(350) #

(351) ' " 1 

(352) !

(353) " + D ' . "

(354) ' #"

(355)  

(356)  #'

(357) 

(358) "  

(359) !.  #    "

(360) 

(361)  "

(362) 

(363)  

(364)  ". dissection of this muscle, and reperitonealisation [11]. 9

(365)  '  K" H

(366) ' 

(367)  #'

(368).   /1G #

(369)  

(370) AG* 

(371) 

(372)  

(373) 

(374) ' . #"

(375) 

(376)  

(377)  ""#  11+@ + :

(378) .

(379) ' 

(380) " 

(381) ##

(382) '  //*

(383) ' /6*   

(384) . #"+ 5  '  (*   #

(385) + . authors emphasized that laparoscopic approach minimizes trauma '! #

(386) 

(387) 

(388) " '

(389) ' #  '

(390) . and consequent defecation problems. Another highlighted

(391) '

(392) 

(393) !  D;K  #

(394)    4

(395) "  "!.  

(396)   '  '#

(397) 

(398)   

(399) . 

(400)  "

(401) #

(402)  #-4

(403)  ./60+ 

(404)  .

(405) "+ '

(406) '

(407) A(*  

(408) 

(409)  '

(410)  ""#  31.  

(411) !#  /1G   ' ! ' . 

(412) !

(413) " 

(414) " #"

(415) #+ 5  ' "  / #

(416) .  G 

(417) #

(418) 

(419) ' 1@ 

(420)   ##

(421)  #"

(422) .  #' ./@0+ K"

(423)  

(424) "+ #' 

(425) 

(426)  . 

(427)   AG*   >  

(428)   A6* '!

(429) 

(430) . ""#  /6+( + :

(431) 

(432) "  

(433) "

(434)  . posterior compartment, although no patient required reoperation for recurrent prolapse [18]. Sergent et al., presented results of a ## '  //2 #

(435)  

(436) 

(437)  ""#  13. months, and reported the anatomical success rates on the apical,

(438)   # #

(439)   A@* GA*

(440) ' AG*. #"+ :" #' ?

(441) "  " 

(442) ' 4

(443) " . ' ./A0+ 9

(444) ## '  /)/ #

(445)  ;

(446) " .

(447) "+ #' AG*  >  

(448)  A1*  >  

(449) .

(450) '

(451)    

(452) 

(453) 

(454)  ""#  /6. months. They reported the anterior compartment as the main    >  .6)0+  

(455) "+ #' !-

(456) . #   ?

(457) "  " 

(458) ' 4

(459) "

(460) '

(461) 

(462) .   A3*  

(463)  

(464)   A3  /6 

(465) .  #

(466)  .6/0+  

(467) "+ '

(468) ' GG*

(469) ' :!

(470) 

(471) "

(472). #' A@*  > 

(473) ' /))*  >  

(474)  .  !#  G3

(475) ' @3 #

(476)  #"

(477)  

(478)  "" #  63  ./2 660+ N!! #' "! "  D;K.

(479) ! 22 

(480)  

(481)  ""#  22 

(482) !. !' 

(483) " ##  A6*   #

(484)   36*  . 

(485) !

(486) " 

(487) "" #"

(488) # .G0+ 5

(489)  #

(490)     # "

(491) . #'

(492)  

(493) '  ((

(494) ' /A)  ./6 /@0+. 952. The literature offers only a few studies comparing the   # + D;K #'+ % #. 

(495) '' ' #

(496) '

(497) !#  @A3 #

(498)  . ' # #' 

(499) !#  /@2  > . underwent laparoscopy. The laparoscopic approach turned out  

(500) 

(501) '  !-

(502) " 

(503) '   #

(504) . 

(505)  

(506) !

(507) " 

(508) "" #"

(509) #+ N ##

(510) . #"

(511)       # !#+ 5 related complications were more frequent after laparoscopy, when concomitant hysterectomy was performed, as compared  # ! ./)0+  "   D:; ' $

(512) ''. ""' 

(513) " 

(514) '

(515) " + D;K& ' "

(516)  .   #' 

(517) 

(518) '

(519) 

(520) !  D;K   . 

(521) " '

(522) !

(523) '   '

(524) "

(525)  .610+ : . " #  ' #

(526) ' 

(527) '

(528) ".   

(529) "" 

(530)  

(531) "##4 

(532) 

(533) "  //63. patients who were analyzed. This comparison indicated that the

(534) '

(535) "

(536) ##

(537)  $(GA #

(538) & 

(539) 

(540) 

(541) ' 

(542) !

(543) . complication rate compared to laparoscopic or robotic sacral "##4 $(1( #

(544) &X 6)* + /6+@*+ :

(545) 

(546) " ".  "

(547)  

(548) "" !#+ Y 

(549) "" 

(550)  ?. 

(551) ' " "' "  #

(552) "

(553)   "! #

(554) . time. When comparing laparoscopy to robotic operation, there was no difference in anatomic failures but laparoscopy was associated with more complications compared with robotic 

(555) "##4 $/G* + @*& .630+ 9

(556) 

(557) '' " 

(558) ". # "'  6)/3  #

(559) ' "

(560) #

(561) #

(562) '  . procedures, the authors found no difference in outcomes and

(563) '    !#+ N "! #

(564) . times, higher pain scores, and higher costs were noted in the robotic group [25]. Similar results were noted in a trial carried   

(565) 

(566)  

(567) "+  6)// .620+ ; 

(568) "+ #' .  #

(569)       !#   

(570) '

(571) 

(572) !. 

(573)  ""-'  #

(574) !  

(575) "" #

(576) !  . .6@0+ 9  

(577) 

(578) '' 

(579) " 

(580) '   5

(581)  

(582) "+. #

(583) ! D;K  

(584) " 

(585) !

(586) "  $\5&  

(587) !

(588) ". 

(589) " #"

(590) #

(591)  6 

(592)  

(593)  #' ! 

(594) 

(595) .

(596) '  >  

(597)   " ##

(598)   '. and reoperation rate for the laparoscopic group. Patients who ' "

(599) #

(600) # 

(601) ' ? 

(602) '  #

(603) ". stay, but their operations lasted longer [28]. Cost analysis of both ? 

(604) "'. D;K   " 4# 

(605)  \5 ' . " 

(606) " #

(607) 

(608) ' #

(609)   .6A0+

(610) 

(611) 

(612). et al., found that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy reduces the risk of   

(613) ' 

(614)  #

(615) '   

(616) !

(617) "  ./30+ Complications related to laparoscopic sacral colpopexy are similar to those reported for other laparoscopic gynecological procedures (i.e. total laparoscopic hysterectomy) except spondylodiscitis, which is a known complication of #-4

(618) 

(619) ' 

(620) #

(621)  > 

(622) 

(623) 

(624) ".  '! '   

(625) 

(626) "

(627) 

(628) ./6 1)0+. : " ##  '   "

(629) '. comparing complications between open abdominal surgery

(630) ' D;K   

(631)   

(632) " #"

(633) # #' ''. "' "  #

(634) "

(635) 

(636) '  #'"

(637) '. #"

(638)    

(639) "" 

(640)  !# .1)0+ 8 . synthetic material such as prolene mesh in POP surgery is

(641) 

(642) '   #  #- "! #"

(643) . such as mesh erosion or mesh migration. Reports in the literature. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. Nr 12/2014.

(644) Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 950-954. 4 6 % ' )  4 3 + 0 Á ( 3 ; ) g i n e kol og i a. Krzysztof Gałczyński et al. Laparoscopic mesh procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse – review of the literature.. !  

(645)  "'' 

(646)   )  //* 

(647) . 

(648) "" 

(649)   6+@* # #' .1/0+ 5 !

(650)  

(651)  .   )+G/A*  

(652)  

(653) '

(654) " 

(655) 

(656) " "##4 .160+. Some studies emphasize differences in the rates of erosion with different materials. Thus, choosing the most appropriate graft 

(657) 

(658) "  #

(659)  .1/0+ 9

(660) 

(661) 

(662) 

(663) "  6(G '

(664) ! 

(665)   . after apical prolapse repair, the authors reported a reoperation rate  6+1*  

(666) "##4 

(667) 

(668)  ""#  62 X.  #

(669)   /+1*

(670)  

(671) 

(672) !

(673) "  #

(674)  

(675) 

(676) . ""#  /@ X

(677) ' 1+A*

(678)  

(679) '

(680) " 

(681) !

(682) " 

(683) ". #   

(684) 

(685) "

(686) 

(687) 

(688)   16 +. N  

(689) "    #

(690)  '  

(691) '. #"

(692)  

(693)   !   

(694) 

(695) !

(696) "  !#. 

(697) ! G+(* .60+ A large number of studies on laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy procedures demonstrate that the technique is feasible and    " ##

(698)  #"

(699) 

(700) ' 

(701) 

(702) . "! " ./60+. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy 9  "

(703) #

(704) # 

(705) 

(706) " #4   . suspended to the promontory using a bifurcated mesh. At the beginning of the procedure, each broad ligament is opened at  ""   > ! 

(707) 

(708) "

(709) 

(710) 

(711) +. :      #  "

(712) ''.  '' '

(713) "" .110+ 

(714)  

(715)    

(716) . '' "

(717) 

(718) "" ! #" 

(719) ' '

(720) '.    -4'      4+ : 

(721) ' .

(722) 

(723)  -4' !   

(724) 

(725) " #

(726) ' ' . peritoneum. The largest study assessing this procedure was described by 

(727) 

(728)  

(729) "+  

(730)   

(731) 

(732) " '  /3) #

(733) . ' 

(734)  GA*     

(735) -'   "

(736) '. 4#' !-

(737)  # 

(738) ""

(739) '

(740) #  " .

(741)  

(742)  ""#  6+/ 

(743) + 

(744)  #' 

(745)  3* .  #

(746)  

(747) '  

(748) #

(749) " #"

(750) # 6(* 

(751) '

(752) . #"

(753) # '!

(754) /3

(755)  ""#+   4#.   '   

(756) ' !#+ 

(757)  #

(758) ' . '    #

(759)     # " 

(760)   

(761) . 

(762) '" 

(763) 

(764)   ""  '

(765) ' '  

(766) ".   #"" "' 4  '"

(767)  '! 

(768) !

(769) " "

(770) . .130+  "

(771)  "

(772)  '

(773) 

(774)  #!

(775) 

(776)  "

(777) #

(778) #. sacral hysteropexy. There were only a few pregnancies after laparoscopic uterosacral hysteropexy, but based on this # "

(779)    ' -"  '

(780)   #  #4.           

(781) '. guarantees fewer recurrences after pregnancy. Gutman and 5

(782)  !!'. 

(783)  

(784) 

(785) " #4 

(786)   

(787)  

(788) 

(789) ". "##4

(790) '  

(791) 

(792) 

(793) " + N.  #' 

(794) 

(795) ' 

(796) -  ! 

(797)  .  4# 

(798)  

(799) 

(800) " #4 .1(0+. Laparoscopic lateral suspension The laparoscopic lateral suspension technique is based on a #" # '

(801) '

(802) " #'+ 9 

(803)  - ' '.  ,   /AAG .120+ 5"#" 

(804) 

(805)    ?. appear in the literature, but the main principles remain the same. After an incision of the peritoneum and dissection of the bladder. Nr 12/2014. "  "

(806) "! 

(807)   

(808) <

(809) #   ''". $  '#'   !

(810) '  "&  -4'  . '#  

(811)  4+ : 

(812) ' !

(813) ''

(814) ". 

(815) ""  

(816)  "

(817) 

(818) "

(819) '

(820)  

(821)  #. iliac spine or through incisions after withdrawn lateral trocars, "

(822)  

(823) ' "

(824) 

(825) "" ! " ' .121@0+ . "

(826)  '' 

(827) 

(828) 

(829) "

(830) 

(831) 

(832)  '  ".  

(833) ""

(834)  "  #

(835)    . peritoneum. Then, the free end of the mesh is passed through extraperitoneal tunnel on both sides and pulled out of the

(836) '

(837) " 

(838) ""  "

(839)   +    "  . 

(840) ' 

(841) 

(842)  

(843)   ""   +   .

(844) 

(845) 

(846) 

(847) " 

(848)    

(849) !

(850) " 

(851) "

(852) '  +. 9 

(853)   4! "  # 

(854) !

(855) " 

(856) ""

(857) '. 

(858) !

(859) " #

(860)  ''

(861) 

(862)    

(863) '.

(864) ''

(865) "   #"

(866) '

(867) ' -4'      

(868) !

(869) ". 

(870) "     

(871) !

(872) " # .120+  #'. 

(873)   # '  #

(874)      !.  "

(875) #

(876) #  

(877) " $;DN&  

(878) "  $DN&. '#'!  !"!

(879) " 

(880)    #

(881)  .121@0+ ,  

(882) "+ 

(883) ## '  @1 #

(884)  . # #

(885)  

(886) !

(887) " 

(888) " #"

(889) # #'.

(890) AG+2*  

(891)   ! ##

(892) 

(893)    

(894) ".

(895) 

(896) /@+( ""#+   '   ' . #"

(897) #  /@+G*  #

(898)   //* ?! #

(899) + :. # '   

(900)   #'

(901) G@+@* . 

(902)   "

(903) 

(904) " # 

(905) ' !#   $ .  #' &

(906)  '

(907)  /A   "" #+ 5  '  (+(*  

(908)  .1@0+ 

(909) . #

(910) ' 

(911) '

(912) 

(913) !  "

(914) 

(915) " #  

(916) . genital prolapse, without causing damage to the promontory (no   

(917) 

(918) " " 

(919) "

(920)  >   '

(921) 

(922) !&

(923) '. no need for periotonization.. 

(924)  

(925)   

(926) 

(927)   " #! % ! 

(928)   . popular because many patients, especially younger women, either   #  "  " 

(929)   

(930) . !

(931) "

(932)     ' 

(933) ' 4

(934) "+ 

(935) ". 

(936)  #"

(937) 

(938)  

(939) > ! .131(0+ N '. 

(940) ''  '"! #

(941) #"!  # . tissue support in patients with POP. Careful screening and 

(942) "

(943)   

(944) ' ''

(945) "  

(946) "  '' .  #  #! !+ 

(947) 

(948) ' 5

(949) . #'  ""! 

(950) '

(951)   #!. !| - '

(952) ' '

(953) "  

(954) " #

(955) "!. abnormal or postmenopausal uterine bleeding, tamoxifen therapy

(956) ' ! #'# 

(957) "

(958) " 

(959)  .1(0+ J . '

(960)  4"''   

(961)   #' 

(962) . many studies show increased risk of mesh erosions in the group of patients after sacrocolpopexy, with concomitant hysterectomy   

(963) " + 5

(964) 

(965) 

(966) "  #

(967) 

(968)  '. 

(969) "' 

(970)       

(971) ##4

(972) "  . greater if hysterectomy is performed at the time of sacrocolpopexy $G+2*&

(973)  #

(974) '   

(975)  #'  . $6+6*&   

(976) "  $/+@*& .1(0+ % # ". 4#"

(977) 

(978)   

(979)     

(980) !

(981) " <

(982). 

(983)  

(984) 

(985)   

(986) !

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

It is evident from the table above that in each surgically treated case our histopathologist found some small frag- ments of adrenal glands, even though in the course of surgeries

Material and methods: This matched case control study included sexually inactive women aged 65 years or older who had vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in Tepecik Education

If the rate is compara- ble to anterior mesh implantation and the stress is bearable for elderly patients, this procedure can potentially be an al- ternative for mesh implantation

Objectives: To present anterior abdominal fixation — a new surgical technique for the treatment of pelvic organ prolaps (POP) and to evaluate the results of the treatment of

While the mean total vaginal lengths of the groups were similar in the preoperative period, the postoperative vaginal length was found to be significantly shorter in the patients

Conclusions: Our study suggests that only number of deliveries is associated with development of cystocele, rectocele, and uterine prolapse in women who gave birth by vaginal route

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of concurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) reconstructive surgery on midurethral sling (MUS) procedure outcome. Material and methods: The

Transvaginal six-arm mesh OPUR in women with apical pelvic organ prolapse — analysis of short-term results,.. pelvic floor