• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

COVID-19 mimicking ST-elevation myocardial infarction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "COVID-19 mimicking ST-elevation myocardial infarction"

Copied!
3
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Creative Commons licenses: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons 213

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY -NC -SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).

Image in intervention

Corresponding author:

Kamil Bujak MD, 3rd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 9 M. Curie-Sklodowskiej St, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland, phone: +48 32 37 33 860, e-mail: kamil_bujak@o2.pl

Received: 30.04.2020, accepted: 5.05.2020.

COVID-19 mimicking ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Kamil Bujak, Anna Kazik, Michał Wróbel, Jacek Piegza, Andrzej Lekston, Mariusz Gąsior

3rd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland

Adv Interv Cardiol 2020; 16, 2 (60): 213–215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2020.95632

A 71-year-old woman with a history of previous left anterior descending artery (LAD) angioplasty, non-ST-el- evation myocardial infarction 13 years earlier (treated medically), and hypertension, presented with persistent, midsternal, non-radiating chest pain for several hours, and was admitted to our center during the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Poland. She was transported to our hospital by emergency medical ser- vice after electrocardiogram (ECG) e-transmission, which demonstrated ST-segment elevation in inferior leads, and ST depression, and inverted T waves in V1-3 (Figure 1 A).

During the transport to the hospital, she was started on a loading dose of ticagrelor and unfractionated heparin.

On arrival, she was afebrile; blood pressure was 140/

95 mm Hg, and heart rate was 88/min. She denied dyspnea and cough. However, the patient and other members of her family had influenza-like symptoms for 2 weeks prior to admission. She was brought to the catheterization lab- oratory immediately, where coronary angiography was performed and revealed non-obstructive coronary artery disease and no in-stent restenosis in the LAD (Figures 1 B, C). After the procedure, the patient was transferred di- rectly to the department dedicated to patients with sus- pected or confirmed COVID-19 at our center. The initial and subsequent high-sensitivity troponin I levels were negative. C-reactive protein and D-dimer levels were mildly elevated, whereas other blood test results, includ- ing complete blood count, were within the normal range.

Transthoracic echocardiogram demonstrated preserved left ventricular ejection fraction of 50% with inferior and septal hypokinesis. A chest X-ray showed no pulmonary opacities (Figure 1 D). Due to previous influenza-like symptoms, a nasopharyngeal swab (PCR testing) was performed and was positive for severe acute respiratory

syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Considering that the patient’s status was good with only mild symptoms, she was discharged from the hospital and transferred to the isolation unit on the third day of admission.

The current COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedent- ed and challenging situation for all medical specialties.

While most patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection present with respiratory symptoms, cardiovascular manifes- tations of COVID-19 are also observed in a substantial proportion of patients and are usually associated with poor prognosis [1, 2]. In the cohort of patients hospital- ized for COVID-19 in Wuhan, China, approximately twenty percent of all patients had a cardiac injury, but only 3.4%

complained of chest pain [1]. Most frequently, myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19 seems to be associated with myocarditis or cytokine storm [1, 2]. Increased risk of developing type 1 myocardial infarction (systemic in- flammation predisposes to plaque rupture) and type 2 (related to oxygen supply and demand imbalance) is also possible [1, 3]. Takotsubo syndrome and spontaneous coronary artery dissection have also been observed in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection [3, 4]. None of these conditions were found; moreover, the diagnostic criteria for acute pericarditis were not met in this case. Therefore we could not state with certainty that there was a caus- al relationship between either ischemic ECG changes or an episode of chest pain and COVID-19 in this patient.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the management of pa- tients suspected of acute myocardial infarction needs to be careful and responsible, in order to reduce SARS-CoV-2 spread.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

(2)

Kamil Bujak et al. COVID-19 mimicking STEMI

214 Advances in Interventional Cardiology 2020; 16, 2 (60)

Figure 1. A – 12-lead electrocardiogram demonstrating ST-segment elevation in inferior leads, and ST depres- sion and inverted T waves in V1-3. B – Left coronary angiogram showing non-obstructive stenoses in circumflex and left descending artery and no in-stent restenosis. C – Right coronary angiogram showing non-significant lesions. D – Chest X-ray revealing no pulmonary opacities

A

B C D

I

II

*III

aVR

aVL

aVF

V1

V2

V3

V4

V5

V6

(3)

Kamil Bujak et al. COVID-19 mimicking STEMI

215

Advances in Interventional Cardiology 2020; 16, 2 (60) References

1. Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, et al. Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, Chi- na. JAMA Cardiol 2020; DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0950.

2. Fried JA, Ramasubbu K, Bhatt R, et al. The variety of cardiovas- cular presentations of COVID-19. Circulation 2020; 141: 1930-6.

3. Courand PY, Harbaoui B, Bonnet M, Lantelme P. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a patient with COVID-19. JACC Car- diovasc Interv 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.006.

4. Meyer P, Degrauwe S, Van Delden C, et al. Typical takotsubo syndrome triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur Heart J 2020;

41: 1860.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

In the case of the patient, since we thought that there was no myocardial involvement and the characteristics of the mass would not affect the decision on surgery, we left the final

Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the main method of reperfusion therapy in patients with ST ‑segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), there

5 In patients with the maximal ST ‑segment elevation in chest leads greater than the maximal ST ‑segment elevation in limb leads with a T wave amplitude greater than an R wave

Our case highlights that acute conus branch occlusion can mimic anterior STEMI due to the left anterior descending artery lesion and should be considered in cases with ST

RESULTS The main findings of this study were as follows: 1) 31.5% of patients had at least 1 STEMI equivalent, mostly the N ‑wave in lead II, III, or aVF; 2) the most common

However, when referral for emergent reperfusion therapy is based only on the ECG criteria for STEMI or NSTEMI diagnosis, we lose around 25% of patients with acute total occlusion

Macroscopic (A) and microscopic (B) views of the tumour excised from the aortic valve showing avascu- lar papillary tumour corresponding with papillary fibroela- stoma; macroscopic

Taking into consideration the clinical presentation and angiographic findings, the patient was qualified for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with aspiration