• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

WHY DO WE BELIEVE IN THE INTENDED MODELS? JERZY POGONOWSKI

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "WHY DO WE BELIEVE IN THE INTENDED MODELS? JERZY POGONOWSKI"

Copied!
1
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

WHY DO WE BELIEVE IN THE INTENDED MODELS?

JERZY POGONOWSKI

The origin of many mathematical theories is related to the reflection on properties of some distinguished structures. To be slightly more precise: the presently accepted important axiomatic theories are final results of a long research during which we have accumulated the knowledge about some struc- tures thought of later as standard. Up to the XIXth century the axiomatic method in an overt form was applied in geometry only. Due to efforts of several mathematicians from the XIXth and early XXth century it has be- come standard. The awareness that a mathematical theory can have many different models arose subsequently. Simultaneous development of mathe- matical logic has brought new concepts – like categoricity and completeness – as well as (mainly negative) results concerning them, e.g. the L¨owenheim- Skolem theorem, incompleteness results in arithmetic and set theory. On the basis of these results it can be argued that the notion of the intended model of a theory can be characterized mainly in the pragmatic sense. How- ever, professional mathematicians seem to be satisfied with characterization of their beloved intended models (like the standard natural numbers, the real numbers, the “true” sets), though such characterization is possible only in rather strong systems of logic, lacking some nice deductive properties.

Thus, it seems that they strongly believe in the intended models, so to speak. There are some theorems (like e.g. Tennenbaum theorem, isomor- phism theorems in algebra, etc.) which support such beliefs. Nevertheless the initial hope that some simple extremal axioms could provide the unique characterization of the intended models underwent revision which is visible for instance in the modern model theory.

We are going to discuss some aspects of the approach to the intended models in a historical perspective in our talk, stressing the role of extremal axioms in this development.

The work on this paper has been sponsored by the National Scientific Cen- ter research grant 2015/17/B/HS1/02232 Extremal axioms: logical, mathe- matical and cognitive aspects.

Department of Logic and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland

E-mail address: pogon@amu.edu.pl

1

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

(One can also give a different proof by adapting that of Proposition 3 below; see the remark following that proposition.).. In this paper we obtain several new estimates of l(q) and

The most famous recent result is in the area of extending P t -sets and is due to Baker and Davenport [1], who used Diophan- tine approximation to show that the P 1 -set {1, 3, 8,

Postulating the existence of a large cardinal (whose existence can not be proved from the axioms of ZF) is, of course, a kind of a maximality condition. But it is not only a

Nevertheless, given the textual evidence above as well as his various informal remarks on the effect of the axiom candidate as imposing a minimal model, on

Podsumowując, argumenty przedstawiane na poparcie tezy, iż w razie naby- cia prawa udziałowego przez jednego z małżonków za środki dorobkowe prawo udziałowe staje się

With increasing degree of condensation (Si/N ratio) in the nitridosilicates, the coordination number of N by Si increases, the Si–N bond lengths decrease, the M–N bond lengths

The Editorial Board of Studia Elckie wishes to thank all the Peer Reviewers for their hard work and diligence in re- viewing articles submitted for publication in 2014

Mechanisms which shape popular culture and its practices, thanks to their inherent sensitivity to changes in social and conceptual fabric, are best equipped to make