• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

677C > T and 1298A > C MTHFR polymorphisms affect arechin treatment outcome in rheumatoid arthritis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "677C > T and 1298A > C MTHFR polymorphisms affect arechin treatment outcome in rheumatoid arthritis"

Copied!
6
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

677C > T and 1298A > C MTHFR polymorphisms affect arechin treatment outcome in rheumatoid arthritis

Andrzej Pawlik1, Mateusz Kurzawski2, Wanda Górnik1, Ewa D¹browska-¯amojcin2, Marek DroŸdzik2

Department of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powstañców Wielkopolskich 72, PL 70-111 Szczecin, Poland

Correspondence: Andrzej Pawlik, e-mail: pawand@poczta.onet

Abstract:

Despite the availability of several new agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), arechin (hydroxychloroquine) remains the mainstay because of both cost-effectiveness and experience with its use. However, there is considerable variation in response to this drug, with toxicity limiting treatment in some patients. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is involved in the folate metabolism and has been shown to be polymorphic what affects the enzyme activity. To examine the association between 677C > T and 1298A > CMTHFR polymorphisms and arechin efficacy in the treatment of RA, a total of 50 RA patients, treated with arechin were analyzed.

In univariate regression analysis model,MTHFR 677T allele was associated with significantly higher frequency of remission, whereas 1298C allele carriers showed a tendency to higher remission rate. In univariate regression analysis model, the presence of MTHFR 677T allele was associated with 2.3-fold higher frequency of remission. Multivariate regression analysis taking into the ac- count the combined effect ofMTHFR 677T and 1298C alleles revealed that both alleles were independent factors associated with in- creased frequency of remission. The results of our study suggest that 677T and 1298C alleles are independent factors associated with increased frequency of remission and the evaluation of C677C > T and A1298A > CMTHFR polymorphisms may be a useful tool to predict arechin treatment outcome in RA patients.

Key words:

MTHFR, polymorphism, arechin, rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction

Pharmacogenetics focuses on the genetic variations responsible for drug metabolism, drug transport and drug targets to determine how these variations result in inherited alterations in medication outcomes [14, 15, 20]. Identification of genetic determinants of drug efficacy and toxicity will be valuable because they can be ascertained in the individual patient before ini- tiation of therapy [1, 3, 13].

Despite the availability of several new agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), arechin re-

mains the mainstay because of both cost-effectiveness and experience with its use. However, there is consid- erable variation in response to this drug, with toxicity limiting treatment in some patients [21]. Recent stud- ies have shown that mechanisms of resistance of ma- laria parasites to arechin are associated with folate metabolism [10]. Several polymorphisms have been described in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene. Of these, the 677C > T and 1298A > C polymorphisms have been associated with altered phenotypes and adverse drug events [19]. The 677C >

T polymorphism, first described in the mid 1990s, re-

Pharmacological Reports 2007, 59, 721–726 ISSN 1734-1140

Copyright © 2007 by Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences

(2)

mozygous 677TT variant, with about 30% of wide- type activity, is present in about 8–10% of the general population [12]. Heterozygotes have about 60% activ- ity and constitute approximately 40% of the popula- tion. The 677C > T polymorphism has been shown to be associated with decreased risk of acute lymphoblas- tic leukemia (ALL) and colorectal neoplasm, as well as with increased risk of neural tube defects and cardio- vascular disease [8, 16, 22]. It has also been shown to influence the clinical effects of drugs, such as methotrexate, estrogen, anticonvulsants, levodopa, and cholestyramine [2, 23–25, 30]. Urano et al. showed that patients with 1298C allele were administered sig- nificantly lower MTX doses, while a higher rate of MTX side effects was observed in patients with 677T allele [24]. Moreover, the presence of 1298C allele, correlated with the improvement of RA symptoms.

Women with the 677TT genotype did not show de- creased homocysteine in response to hormone replace- ment therapy as demonstrated for women with the 677CC genotype and may receive decreased cardiovas- cular benefits from hormone replacement therapy [2].

Yasui et al. found that the levels of homocysteine, a possible risk factor for vascular disease, were elevated by 60% in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson’s disease, with the most marked elevation occurring in patients with the 677TT genotype [30]. In children with familial hypercholesterolemia, heterozygosity and homozygosity for the 677T allele was associated with low serum folate and increased susceptibility to eleva- tion of plasma total homocysteine during cholesty- ramine treatment [23].

The aim of the present study was to examine the ef- fect of 677C > T and 1298A > C MTHFR polymor- phisms on treatment outcome in patients with RA ad- ministered with arechin.

Materials and Methods

Patients

The study was carried out on 50 patients from Pome- ranian region of Poland (41 women, 9 men, aged

Rheumatology (ACR). All patients underwent a month- ly evaluation for one year, applying the 1995 ACR preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical improvement was evaluated accord- ing to the ACR 20% response criteria. The ACR core set of variables included: the number of swollen joints, the number of tender joints, physician’s global assessment of disease activity on a 0–10 scale, pa- tient’s global assessment of disease activity on a 0–10 scale, patient’s assessment of pain on a 100-mm vis- ual analog scale (VAS), functional status of patient’s using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scored on a 0–3 scale. A 28-joint count (including the metacarpophalangeal joints, the proximal interphalan- geal joints, wrists and elbows) was used [4, 29]. A pa- tient was classified as a good responder when both the tender joint count and the swollen joint count were

³ 20% improved from baseline and at least 3 of the following criteria were met: ³ 20% improvement in VAS, in ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), in phy- sician’s global assessment of disease activity, in pati- ent’s global assessment of disease activity, and in HAQ. The group “good responders” included patients in remission for at least 6 months [5, 18]. The study was approved by the local ethics committee and writ- ten informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted manually (precipitation with trimethylammonium bromide salts from leuko- cytes contained in 450 ml of venous blood collected with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an anticoagu- lant) [11]. DNA was then precipitated in 95% ethanol, dissolved in distilled water and stored at –20°C until analysis. The 677C > T (rs1801133) and 1298A > C (rs1801131) polymorphisms were detected using a PCR-RFLP method, as previously described [24].

The genotyping has been carried out without knowing the participants’ treatment response.

Statistical analysis

Allele and genotype frequencies were compared using two-sided Fisher exact test. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calcu-

(3)

lated for the chance of response to arechin treatment.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the influence of 677C > T and 1298A > C polymorphisms on the response to arechin treatment. The independent variables in these models were the numbers of 677T and 1298C alleles (0, 1 or 2) for each patient. A p level of less than 0.05 was con- sidered statistically significant. Calculations were per- formed using Statistica 6.1 software package.

Results

The efficacy of RA therapy with arechin is presented in Tables 1 and 2. Under arechin therapy remission of RA symptoms was achieved in 100% of MTHFR 677TT genotype carriers (1 of 1), in 61.5% of subjects with 677CT genotype (16 of 26), and in 43.4% of pa- tients with 677CC genotype (10 of 23, Fig. 1). The probability of remission of RA symptoms was 2-fold higher in carriers of 677CT genotype as compared with patients with 677CC genotype (OR = 2.08, 95%CI: 0.66–6.52, p = 0.258). The frequency of 677T allele among arechin responders was 33.3%, com- pared to 21.7% in a group of poor arechin responders (OR = 1.80, 95%CI: 0.73–4.43, p = 0.265) (Tab. 1).

The remission of RA symptoms was observed in 100% of MTHFR 1298CC genotype carriers (4 of 4), in 42.3% of subjects with 1298AC genotype (11 of 26), and in 60.0% of 1298AA homozygotes (12 of 20). The frequency of 1298C allele among arechin re- sponders was 35.2%, compared to 32.6% in the group of poor arechin responders (OR = 1.12, 95%CI:

0.49–2.58, p = 0.835) (Tab. 2).

In univariate regression analysis model, the presence of MTHFR 677T allele was associated with 2.3-fold higher frequency of remission (Tab. 3). In multivari- ate regression analysis taking into account the com- bined effect of MTHFR 677T and 1298C alleles, it was found that both alleles were independent factors associated with increased frequency of remission (Tab. 4). In haplotype analysis, 677C-1298A haplo- type was associated with decreased frequency of re- mission (OR = 0.37; 95%CI: 0.12–1.16, p = 0.079).

As shown in Table 5, there were no significant dif- ferences in age, disease duration, erosive disease, RF positivity, baseline DAS28 between patients in remis- sion and non-responders treatment.

Discussion

In contrast to the well-documented safety and efficacy of arechin, its mechanism of action is poorly under- stood. It has been proposed that the marked accumu- lation of arechin in the lysosomal compartment is re- sponsible for the therapeutic effect of these drugs.

MTHFR polymorphisms affect arechin treatment in RA

Andrzej Pawlik et al.

Tab. 1. MTHFR 677C > T genotypes in relation to patients’ response to treatment

Responders n = 27

Non-responders

n = 23 p

value= OR (95%CI)

n % n %

677C > T genotype

TT 1 3.7 0 0.0 0.458

CT 16 59.3 10 43.5 0.258 2.08 (0.66–6.52)

CC 10 37.0 13 56.5

677C > T allele

T 18 33.3 10 21.7 0.265 1.80 (0.73–4.43)

C 36 66.7 36 78.3

=Fisher exact test; compared to CC (or C) as reference genotype (allele)

Tab. 2.MTHFR 1298A > C genotypes in relation to patients’ re- sponse to treatment

Responders n = 27

Non-responders

n = 23 p

value= OR (95%CI)

n % n %

1298A > C genotype

CC 4 14.8 0 0.0 0.262

AC 11 40.7 15 65.2 0.373 0.49 (0.15–1.60)

AA 12 44.5 8 34.8

1298A > C allele

C 19 35.2 15 32.6 0.835 1.12 (0.49–2.58)

A 35 64.8 31 67.4

=Fisher exact test; compared to AA (or A) as reference genotype (allele)

(4)

Arechin is a weak base, so high concentration of are- chin can elevate the pH within lysosomes, which re- sults in inactivation of acid proteases. Arechin was shown to interfere with inhibition of receptor func- tion, to inhibit intracellular processing and secretion of proteins, to decrease lymphocyte proliferation and to interfere with natural killer T-cell activity [17].

Arechin was also shown to decrease the production of various cytokines in vitro. The molecular pathways leading to these effects are, however, unclear. In rela- tion to inhibitory effects of arechin on the production of various cytokines, it was reported that arechin in- hibited the production of tumor necrosis factor in hu- man peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated with lipopolysaccharide [27].

In the present study, we have examined the effect of 677C > T and 1298A > CMTHFR polymorphisms

on treatment outcome in RA patients administered arechin. In genotype analysis, the probability of re- mission of RA symptoms was higher in carriers of 677T and 1298C alleles, but this effect did not reach statistical significance.

In univariate regression analysis model, the higher number ofMTHFR 677T alleles was associated with significantly higher rate of remission, whereas in mul- tivariate regression analysis, taking into account the combined effect ofMTHFR 677T and 1298C alleles, both these alleles were associated with increased fre-

Fig. 1. Efficacy of RA therapy with arechin in relation toMTHFR 677C

> T (A) and 1298A > C (B) polymorphisms

Logistic regression model

alleles alleles

OR (95% CI)

Univariate 2.30 (0.76–7.01) 1.15 (0.45–2.91) Multivariate

(677T + 1298C)

4.02 (0.96–16.91)* 2.27 (0.68–7.60)

* p = 0.05; Odds ratios calculated for the presence of one copy of the indicated allele

Tab. 4.Univariate logistic regression models predicting odds ratios for patients’ response to treatment in relation toMTHFR 677-1298 haplotypes

Haplotype OR (95% CI) for positive response

p value

677C-1298A 0.37 (0.12–1.16) 0.079

677C-1298C 1.15 (0.45–2.91) 0.768

677T-1298A 2.30 (0.76–7.01) 0.132

Odds ratios calculated for the presence of one copy of the indicated haplotype

Tab. 5. Characteristics of patients in relation to response to treatment

Responders Non-responders p value Mean age (years) 53.4 ± 11.0 53.1 ± 9.8 0.921 Disease duration (years) 6.7 ± 3.8 6.5 ± 3.4 0.847

Erosive disease (%) 81.4 78.3 1.0

RF positive RA (%) 70.4 73.9 1.0

DAS28 baseline 5.7 ± 2.4 5.9 ± 1.8 0.871

(5)

quency of remission. The haplotype analysis showed the decreased frequency of remission in carriers of 677C-1298A haplotype.

In our study, the increased frequency of remission of RA symptoms in patients treated with arechin car- ryingMTHFR 677T and 1298C alleles, previously as- sociated with lower MTHFR activity, suggests that decreased MTHFR activity (independently of poly- morphism) might be associated with better response to treatment. It might involve more efficient down-re- gulation of 5-methyl-THF synthesis through MTHFR, and subsequently reduced methionine production from homocysteine and 5-methyl-THF through methionine synthase and S-adenosylmethionine [6]. S-adenosyl- methionine is the main donor of methyl group in seve- ral biochemical pathways and reactions of DNA me- thylation. The limited availability of S-adenosylme- thionine may affect expression of genes involved in inflammatory response in RA patients.

An increased availability of 5-methylene-THF might be another mechanism of better response to are- chin treatment in carriers of alleles associated with lower MTHFR activity. 5-Methylene-THF is a sub- strate in the alternative de novo pyrimidine biosyn- thetic pathway, where this compound is metabolized by thymidylate synthase (TYMS) to dihydrofolate (DHF) [7]. 5-Methylene-THF is subsequently me- tabolized to active pool of tetrahydrofolate (THF) de- rivates through dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). Im- paired reduction of 5-methylene-THF to 5-methyl- THF associated with lower MTHFR activity produces depletion of THF pool through TYMS pathway and subsequently enhances decreased availability of THF derivates for many biochemical pathways in cells in- volved in inflammatory reactions [26].

Hyperhomocysteinemia is an independent risk fac- tor of coronary artery disease. In our study, the plasma levels of homocysteine were not measured because the considerable part of patients was treated with drugs influencing the circulatory systems. As shown previously, these drugs may affect homocysteine plasma levels [9, 28]. This fact may be one of the limitations of our study as well as the number of pa- tients, insufficient to draw the ultimate conclusion about the influence ofMTHFR polymorphisms on ef- ficacy of arechine treatment in RA and its importance in clinical practice.

The aforementioned results suggest indirectly that anti-inflammatory action of arechin in patients with RA is associated with the influence on folate and pu-

rine synthesis in cells involved in inflammatory re- sponse, and the evaluation of 677C > T and 1298A > C MTHFR polymorphisms might be a useful tool to pre- dict arechin treatment outcome in RA patients. Never- theless, this hypothesis requires further investigations.

Acknowledgments:

The study was supported by grant 2P05B11029 for years 2005–2008 from the Ministry of Education and Science (Warszawa, Poland). Mateusz Kurzawski is supported by The Foundation for Polish Science (FNP).

References:

1. Bartnicka L, Kurzawski M, DroŸdzik A, P³oñska- Goœciniak E, Górnik W, DroŸdzik M: Effect of ABCB1 (MDR1) 3435C >T and 2677G >A,T polymorphisms and P-glycoprotein inhibitors on salivary digoxin secretion in congestive heart failure patients. Pharmacol Rep, 2007, 59, 323–329.

2. Brown CA, McKinney KQ, Young KB, Norton HJ:

C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymor- phism influences the homocysteine-lowering effect of hormone replacement therapy. Mol Genet Metab, 1999, 67, 43–48.

3. Chrzanowska M, Kurzawski M, DroŸdzik M, Mazik M, Oko A, Czekalski S: Thiopurine S-methyltransferase phenotype-genotype correlation in hemodialyzed pa- tients. Pharmacol Rep, 2006, 58, 973–978.

4. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Chernoff M, Fried B, Furst D et al.: The American Col- lege of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials.

The Committee on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. Arthritis Rheum, 1993, 36, 729–740.

5. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Furst D, Goldsmith C, Katz LM et al.: American Col- lege of Rheumatology. Preliminary definition of im- provement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum, 1995, 38, 727–735.

6. Fowler B: Homocysteine: overview of biochemistry, molecular biology, and role in disease processes. Semin Vasc Med, 2005, 5, 77–86.

7. Fowler B: The folate cycle and disease in humans.

Kidney Int, 2001, 78, 221–229.

8. Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R , Goyette P, Sheppard CA, Matthews RG, Boers GJ et al.: A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet, 1995, 10, 111–113.

9. Fu YF, Xiong Y, Guo Z: A reduction of endogenous asymmetric dimethylarginine contributes to the effect of captopril on endothelial dysfunction induced by homocysteine in rats. Eur J Pharmacol, 2005, 508, 167–175.

MTHFR polymorphisms affect arechin treatment in RA

Andrzej Pawlik et al.

(6)

DNA extraction from whole human blood. Biotech- niques, 1991, 11, 298–302.

12. Kang SS, Zhou J, Wong PW, Kowalisyn J, Strokosch G:

Intermediate homocysteinemia: a thermolabile variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Am J Hum Genet, 1988, 43, 414–421.

13. Kotrych K, Sulikowski T, Domañski L, Bia³ecka M, DroŸdzik M: Polymorphism in the P-glycoprotein drug transporter MDR1 gene in renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporin A in a Polish population.

Pharmacol Rep, 2007, 59, 199–205.

14. Kurzawski M, Bartnicka L, Florczak M, Górnik W, DroŸdzik M: Impact of ABCB1 (MDR1) gene polymor- phism and P-glycoprotein inhibitors on digoxin serum concentration in congestive heart failure patients.

Pharmacol Rep, 2007, 59, 107–111.

15. Kurzawski M, Pawlik A, Górnik W, DroŸdzik M:

Frequency of common MDR1 gene variants in a Polish population. Pharmacol Rep, 2006, 58, 35–40.

16. Lima CS, Nascimento H, Bonadia LC, Teori MT, Coy CS, Goes JR, Costa FF, Bertuzzo CS: Polymor- phisms in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR) and the age of onset of sporadic colorectal adenocarcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2007, 22, 757–763.

17. O’Dell JR, Leff R, Paulsen G, Haire C, Mallek J, Eckhoff PJ, Fernandez A et al.: Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate and sulfasalazine or a combination of the three medications: results of a two-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum, 2002, 46, 1164–1170.

18. Pincus T, Summey JA, Soraci SA Jr, Wallston KA, Hummon NP: Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum, 1983, 26, 1346–1353.

19. Rozen R: Molecular genetics of methylenetetrahydrofo- late reductase deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis, 1996, 19, 589–594.

20. Rychlik-Sych M, Skrêtkowicz J, Gawroñska-Szklarz B, Górnik W, Sysa-Jêdrzejowska A, Skrêtkowicz-Szamach K: Acetylation genotype and phenotype in patients with

mann K, Schlegelberger B, Elsner HA et al.: Polymor- phisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and susceptibility to pediatric acute lymphoblastic leuke- mia in a German study population. BMC Med Genet, 2005, 27, 6–23.

23. Tonstad S, Refsum H, Ose L, Ueland PM: The C677T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene predisposes to hyperhomocysteinemia in children with familial hypercholesterolemia treated with cholesty- ramine. J Pediatr, 1998, 132, 365–368.

24. Urano W, Taniguchi A, Yamanaka H, Tanaka E, Naka- jima H, Matsuda Y, Akama H et al.: Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene were asso- ciated with both the efficacy and the toxicity of metho- trexate used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, as evidenced by single locus and haplotype analyses. Phar- macogenetics, 2002, 12, 183–190.

25. Vilaseca MA, Monros E, Artuch R, Colome C, Farre C, Valls C, Cardo E, Pineda M: Antiepileptic drug treatment in children: hyperhomocysteinaemia, B-vitamins and the 677C®T mutation of the methylenetetrahydrofolate re- ductase gene. Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 2000, 4, 269–277.

26. Wang X, Fenech M: A comparison of folic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate for prevention of DNA damage and cell death in human lymphocytesin vitro. Mutagene- sis, 2003, 18, 81–86.

27. Weber SM, Levitz SM: Chloroquine interferes with lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-alpha gene expression by a nonlysosomotropic mechanism. J Immunol, 2000, 165, 1534–1540.

28. Westphal S, Rading A, Luley C, Dierkes J: Antihyper- tensive treatment and homocysteine concentrations. Me- tabolizm, 2003, 52, 261–263.

29. Wolfe F, O’Dell JR, Kavanaugh A, Wilske K, Pincus T:

Evaluating severity and status in rheumatoid arthritis.

J Rheumatol, 2001, 28, 1453–1462.

30. Yasui K, Kowa H, Nakaso K, Takeshima T, Nakashima K: Plasma homocysteine and MTHFR C677T genotype in levodopa-treated patients with PD. Neurology, 2000, 8, 55, 437–440.

Received:

February 5, 2007; in revised form: November 23, 2007.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Adalimumab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis in therapeutic programmes – personal experienceK. Doświadczenia własne

Należy jednak pamiętać, że stosowanie leków blo- kujących działanie TNF- α nie gwarantuje uzyskania remi- sji choroby u każdego pacjenta, a ich stosowanie wiąże się

Na podstawie dostępnych, choć dość ograniczonych danych, można stwierdzić, że terapia leflunomidem poprawia jakość życia pacjentów z RZS, zwłaszcza w ocenie dokonanej przy

In conclusion, our study showed that treatment of patients suffering from moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis with tocilizumab results in a rapid and lasting reduc- tion

Celem pracy jest przedstawienie specyfiki zastoso- wania ćwiczeń z narastającym oporem przy użyciu coraz popularniejszych gumowych taśm elastycznych u pa - cjentów z

Adalimumab, a fully human anti tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients taking concomitant methotrexate: the ARMADA

W grupie chorych po wcześniejszym niepowodzeniu terapii lekami modyfikującymi przebieg choroby kryte- ria ACR po pierwszym cyklu leczenia spełniło:... Małą aktywność choroby wg

Przed rozpoczęciem leczenia infliksymabem wysoką aktywność choroby stwierdzano u 90% pacjentów, umiarkowaną – u 10% (tab.. terapii odsetek ten wyniósł odpowiednio 35%