• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

On dendroids for which smoothness, pointwise smoothness and hereditary contractibility are equivalent

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "On dendroids for which smoothness, pointwise smoothness and hereditary contractibility are equivalent"

Copied!
4
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

ANNALES SOCIETATIS MATHEMATICAE POLONAE Series I: COMMENTATIONES MATHEMATICAE XXV (1985) ROCZNIKI POLSKIEGO TOWARZYSTWA MATEMATYCZNEGO

Séria I: PRACE MATEMATYCZNE XXV (1985)

S

tanislaw

T. C

zuba

(Wroclaw)

On dendroids for which smoothness, pointwise smoothness and hereditary contractibility are equivalent

In [4], Theorem 1 and Corollary 1, it is proved that for fans (a fan is a dendroid with only one ramification point) smoothness, pointwise smooth­

ness and hereditary contractibility are equivalent. In this paper we generalize this theorem, i.e., we give a characterization of those hereditarily contractible dendroids for which smoothness and pointwise smoothness are equivalent, and we define a class of dendroids, larger than fans, for which the conditions:

hereditary contractibility, pointwise smoothness and smoothness are equivalent.

The author is very much indebted to Professor J. J. Charatonik for his advice during the preparation of this paper.

A continuum is a compact connected metric space. A continuum X is called hereditarily unicoherent if for any two subcontinua A and В of X the intersection A n В is connected. A dendroid is an arcwise connected and hereditarily unicoherent continuum.

Given a set A contained in a continuum X , we define К (A) as the set of all points x of X such that there do not exist an open set U and a continuum H such that A cz U a H с X \ {x].

A dendroid X is said to be smooth if there is a point p in X, called an initial point of X, such that for every sequence of points x„ convergent to some point x we have that Lt x„p = xp (see [1], Definition, p. 298).

A dendroid X is said to be pointwise smooth if for any point x of X there is a point p(x) of X such that Lt x„p(x) = xp(x) for each sequence xn converging to x. The point p(x) is called an initial point for x in X (see [4], Definition 2, p. 216).

P

roposition

1 (see [5], Theorem 7). A dendroid X is pointwise smooth if and only if for each point x of X we have K(x) = xp(x).

T

heorem

2. A dendroid X is pointwise smooth if and only if for each point

(2)

28 S. T. Czuba

x of X there is a point p(x) such that for any three convergent sequences x„, a„

and bn conditions

lim x„

=

x, lim an

=

a, lim bn

=

b and a„Exnp(x), b„eanp(x

)

imply Lt a„ b„ — ab.

P ro o f. If for each point x there is a point p(x) such that the above implication holds, then putting a„ = x„ and bn = p{x) we see that X is pointwise smooth by definition. Conversely, let X be pointwise smooth and let p(x) be an initial point for x in X. Therefore Lt x„p(x) = xp(x), so Ls a„ b„ is an arc. Let Ls a„ b„ = uv, where a eu v and beav. If v Ф b (or и Ф a), then it is easy to see that for each point y e b v \ { b , t?} (z e u a \ { u , a}) we have bv

c=

K(y) (ua a K(z)) contrary to Proposition 1. The proof is complete.

A non-degenerate collection G of continua is called a clump (see [3], p.

91) provided G* (the union of all the continua of the collection G) is a continuum and there exists a continuum C, called the center of G, such that C is a proper subcontinuum of every element of G and is the intersection of each two elements of G.

We say that a dendroid X has property (CS) if there exists a clump G of smooth dendroids, having a center C, such that

(a) G* = X ;

(p) there exists a point p of C which is an initial point of each element of G;

(y) the set G* \ C n C (i.e., the boundary of C) is zero-dimensional.

T

heorem

3. I f a pointwise smooth dendroid X has property (CS), then it is smooth, and each point p mentioned in (ft) is an initial point of X.

P ro o f. Let G be a clump from definition of property (CS). Let x e G * and let p(x) be an initial point for x in G*. Take a sequence of points x„ of G* converging to x. If points x„ belong to finitely many elements of G only, then smoothness of G* is evident.

So, we can assume that x„ belong to infinitely many different elements of G. If p(x) does not belong to C, then it is easy to see by pointwise smoothness of X that xp(x) n C Ф 0 . Thus the arcs x„p(x) meet the center C for arbitrarily large n. Let t„ex„p(x) be such that x„ t„ n C = {tn} and let t„k be a subsequence of t„ converging to some point t. By Theorem 2 we have Lt x„k t„k = xt.

Note that x t n C = {t}.

In fact, we have t e C and xt n C = Lt xn t„k n C = Lt (x„k t„k \ (f„J) n n C c z G * \ C n C so by (y) of (CS) and by hereditary unicoherence of G* we conclude x t n C = [t }.

If the sequence tn has two different accumulation points t and z, then the

(3)

On dendroids 29

set (xt и x z ) n C is not connected, contrary to hereditary unicoherence of G*.

Thus t„ converges to t and so Lt x„ t„ = xt.

By definition of G we have that C is a smooth dendroid (see [1], Corollary 6, p. 299) and Lt t„p = tp, whence

Lt x„p = Lt x„ t„ u Lt tnp = x t u tp = xp.

The proof is complete.

Simple examples show us that pointwise smoothness and each con­

ditions of property (CS) are essential in Theorem 3.

Consider now the following three conditions that a dendroid X can satisfy:

(1) X is hereditarily contractible, (2) X is pointwise smooth, (3) X is smooth.

It is known that (1) implies (2) ([6], Corollary 3.10), (3) implies (1) ([1], Corollary 6, p. 299, and [2], Corollary, p. 93) and obviously (3) implies (2).

Thus as a consequence of Theorem 3 we have

C

orollary

4. I f a dendroid X has property (CS), then conditions (1), (2) and (3) are equivalent.

It is easy to see that each smooth dendroid has property (CS), so, by Corollary 4, we have the following characterization.

T

heorem

5. I f a dendroid X is hereditarily contractible, then the following conditions are equivalent:

(a) X has property (CS),

(b) X is smooth if and only if X is pointwise smooth.

Q

uestion

6. Does pointwise smoothness of a dendroid X imply equival­

ence of the following conditions:

(A) X has property (CS),

(B) X is smooth if and only if X is hereditarily contractible?

From Corollary 4 we have that, for pointwise smooth dendroids, (A) implies (B), so, to give a positive answer to Question 6, one has to show that (B) implies (A).

Let X be a dendroid with property (CS). It is evident that the quotient mapping (p: X -+X/C is monotone. Thus (see [2], Corollary 10, p. 309) we have the following

P

roposition

7. I f a smooth dendroid X has property (CS), then X /C is also a smooth dendroid.

T

heorem

8. Let a dendroid X has property (CS). I f the dendroid X /C is .

smooth, then X is also smooth.

(4)

30 S. T. Czuba

P ro o f. Let р е C be an initial point for each element of a clump G (from the property (CS)) and let x e X . If x e C , then for each sequence x„ conver­

ging to x we have Lt x„p = xp by heredity of smoothness (see [1], Corollary 6, p. 299). So, we can assume that x e X \ C . Let x„ be a sequence of points of X \C converging to x. Let tn denote a point of the arc x„ p such that x„ t„ nC

= {f„} and let t„k be a subsequence converging to some point t. By smoothness of X/C we have that Lt x„k t„k = xt. Therefore, by hereditary unicoherence of X we see that the sequence t„ is convergent and that Lt x„tn

= xt, and by zero-dimensionality of the set G * \C n C we have that xt n C

= {r}. Thus by smoothness of C we conclude that Lt tnp = tp and as a consequence Lt x np = xp. The proof is complete.

C

orollary

9. I f a dendroid X has property (CS) and if C denotes a center of a clump for X, then the following properties are equivalent

X is hereditarily contractible, X is pointwise smooth, X is smooth,

X/C is hereditarily contractible, X/C is pointwise smooth, X/C is smooth.

P ro o f. If a dendroid X has property (CS), then X/C is also a dendroid with property (CS) and the conclusion follows from Theorem 8 and Corollary 4.

References

[1] J. J. C h a r a t o n ik , C. E b e r h a r t, On smooth dendroids, Fund. Math. 67 (1970), 297-322.

[2] —, —, On contractible dendroids, Colloq. Math. 25 (1972), 89-98.

[3] H: C o o k , Clumps o f continua, Fund. Math. 86 (1974), 91-100.

[4] S. T. C z u b a , A concept o f pointwise smooth dendroids, Uspehi Math. Nauk. 34:6 (1979), 215-217 or Russian Math. Surveys 34:6 (1979), 169-171.

[5] —, Some other characterizations o f pointwise smooth dendroids, Comment. Math. 24 (1984), 195-200.

[6] —, On pointwise smooth dendroids, Fund. Math. 114 (1981), 185-195.

INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS, UNIVERSITY WROCLAW, POLAND

(INSTYTUT MATEMATYCZNY, UNIWERSYTET WROCLAWSKI)

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

We skip the proofs of the following facts: A is a Dedekind domain (the proof as in problem 2 from set 10) and the ideal class group of A is Z 2 (the proof would make another

A theorem of Kaplan, Miller and Simon (2013) about Borel cardinality of Lascar strong type (Borel cardinality).. A question of Gismatullin and Krupi ´nski (2012) related to

Suppose E is a bounded, invariant equivalence relation on a single complete type with two classes (and therefore orbital by Corollary 3.22). If E is Borel, then is it

Mason [10] proved that the space of self-homeomor- phisms of the closed unit disk which fix pointwise the disk’s boundary is an absolute retract homeomorphic to the separable

We shall prove the first inequality... Nauk Azerbajdzanskoj SSR,

Then for every positive integer к there exists a positive constant c(k) such that for every 2n-periodic, measurable

ANNALES SOCIETAT1S MATHEMATICAE POLONAE Series I: COMMENTATIONES MATHEMATICAE XXVII (1987) ROCZNIKI POLSKIEGO TOWARZYSTWA MATEMATYCZNEGO.. Séria I: PRACE MATEMATYCZNE

Note that we can obtain the usual theory of vector valued integrals directly from this result.. H urw itz, On sequences of continuous functions having continuous limits ,