Modeling of Nanostructures and Materials
Summer Semester 2013 Lecture
Jacek A. Majewski
Chair of Condensed Matter Physics Institute of Theoretical PhysicsFaculty of Physics, Universityof Warsaw
E-mail: Jacek.Majewski@fuw.edu.pl
Jacek A. Majewski
Modeling of Nanostructures and Materials
Lecture 2
–February 28, 2013
Density Functional Theory (DFT) – the key to the
Computational Materials Science T
Th hee B Ba assiiccss
Kohn-Sham realization of the DFT
Fundamental problem in materials science
A fundamental problem in materials science isthe prediction of condensed matter’s electronic structure
DNA - molecule
Crystal - diamond
C
60- molecule H ! = ! E
H = !
!
2"
!22M
!#
!! ! 2m
2"
i2#
i+ 1 2 |
RZ!
!Z"e2!
! !
R!
|
! ,!
# ! |
R!
Z"e2!
! !
ri|
#
i,!+ 1 2 | !r
e2 i! !
rj|
#
i, jMaterials Science:
Examples of Schrödinger Equation?
Ab-initio (first principles) Method –
ONLY Atomic Numbers {
Z
i} as input parameters Materials are composed of nuclei and electrons the interactions are known {Z!,M!,R!!}
{!r
i}
Kinetic energy of nuclei
Kinetic energy of electrons
Nucleus-Nucleus interaction
Electron-Nucleus interaction
Electron-Electron interaction
Quantum Mechanics of Molecules and Crystals
Molecule or Crystal = a system of nuclei (Ions) and electrons
el Nucl
ˆ ˆ
H T U( x, X ) T == ++ ++
en ee NN
ˆ ˆ ˆ
U( x, X ) V ( x, X ) V ( x ) V ( X )== ++ ++
ˆVen( x, X ) == !!Zae2
|! ri!!!
Ra|
"
ia"
ˆVee( x ) == e2
|! ri!!!
rj|
i<< j
"
"
ˆVNN( X ) ==e2
|! Ra!!!
Rb|
a<<b
"
"
ˆTel== 1
i==12m
!
N!
!pi2== !! !2m2i==1
!
N!
!!!i2 ˆTNucl== 1a==12m
Nnucl
!
!
P!i2== !! 2M!2a==1 a Nnucl
!
!
!!!a2X !! {! R1,!
R2,…,! RN
nucl} x !! {!
r1,! r2,…,!
rN} ( M , X ,P )
Nuclei – mass M, coordinates X, and momenta P, Electrons – (m,x,p)
Kinetic energy of electrons Kinetic energy of the nuclei
Potential energy = The total Coulomb energy of nuclei and electrons
Electron-nucleus
Electron-Electron Nucleus-Nucleus
The Adiabatic Approximation (Born-Oppenheimer)
It is natural to consider the full Hamiltonian of the system to be the sum of an ionic and an electronic part
N el
ˆ ˆ ˆ H H == ++ H
N Nucl NN
ˆ ˆ ˆ
H == T ++ V ( X ) H ˆ
el== T V ( x, X ) V ( x ) ˆ
el++ ˆ
en++ ˆ
eeM. Born & J. R. Oppenheimer, Ann. Phys. 84, 457 (1927)
The Adiabatic Approximation (Born-Oppenheimer)
The Schrödinger equation for the electrons in the presence of fixed ions
el n n n
ˆH ! ( X,x ) E ( X )! ( X,x ) ==
Parametric dependence on ionic positions
The energy levels of the system of ions are determined by solving
ˆ
N[ H ++ E( K', X )] !(Q,K', X ) "(Q )!(Q,K', X ) ==
The electronic energy contributes to the potential energy of the ion system.
This implies that the potential energy depends on the state of the electrons.
Adiabatic approximation – interacting electrons move in the ‘external’
potential of nuclei (ions) at fixed positions
en e e
ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ
H T V == ++ ++ V
!!N 2 2 i 1 i
ˆT == 2m
==
# #
!!" ""!ˆVen== !!Z!e2
|"
ri!!! Ra|
!
ia!
== ˆVext== vext(r!i!
i!
)ˆVe!!e== e2
|! ri!!!
rj|
i<< j
"
"
Quantum Mechanics:
System of N electrons in an external potential
Enn== ZaZbe2
|! Ra!!!
Rb|
a<<b
"
"
##
$$%%
&&
''((
{! R1,!
R2,…}
H! E! ==
!({"
R!},"
r1,"
r2,…,"
rN) !!!("
r1,"
r2,…,"
rN)
N 10 !!
23 Many particle wave function0
min | | ˆ min | ˆ ˆ
e eˆ
ext|
N N
E
=
"#"
H" =
"#"
T V+
!+
V"
!(!r
1, !r
2,…,!r
N)
Ritz Variational Principle !! Ground State Energy of the system Many-particle wavefunction Schrödinger equation
Full minimization of the functional with respect to all allowed N-electron wave functions E[! ]
! | H |!ˆ E[! ] ! |!
<< >>
== << >>
E[! ] E!! 0
Quantum Mechanics:
System of N electrons in an external potential H! E! ==
Schrödinger equation Exact analytical solutions are not known
even for two electrons !
Approximations are needed !
Concept of independent particles moving in an effective potential
Interacting particles Independent particles
!(!x1, !x2,…, !x1023) !(!x1)!(!x2)…!(!x1023)
Idea: consider electrons as independent particles moving in an effective potential
Hartree and Hartree-Fock Approximation Ansatz for the wave-function
!
Hartree(!x
1, !x
2,…, !x
N) = !
1(!x
1)!
2(!x
2)....!
N(!x
N)
Hartree MethodHartree-Fock Method
!
H!F(!x
1, !x
2,…, !x
N) = 1
N!!
1(!x
1) !
2(!x
1) … !
N(!x
1)
!
1(!x
2) !
2(!x
2) … !
N(!x
2)
! ! !
!
1(!x
N) !
2(!x
N) … !
N(!x
N)
!
i- one-electron wavefunction of the ith level
Hartree-Fock Approximation
H F H F
H F
H F H F
! | H | ! ˆ E[! ]
!
!!| !
!!!!
!! !!
<< >>
== << >>
Variational Principle
H0
!
i(!x
i) + ! !
j=1N! !
*j(!x
j)U(!x
i, !x
j) !
j(!x
j)d!x
j"
# $
% &!
i(!x
i) ' ! )
j=1N( !
*j(!x
j)U(!x
i, !x
j) !
i(!x
j)d!x
j"
# $
% &!
j(!x
i) = !
i!
i(!x
i)
H == H0++ 12 U(!!xi,!!xj)
i , j
!
!
H0== H0( i ) ==
!
i!
"" 12!!i2
!
i!
++Vext(!!ri) U(!xi,!xj) == 1|!ri!!!rj|
!
H F!!Spectrum of Electronic Hamiltonian:
What ab initio methods do we have?
Methods for computing the electronic structure Empirical Methods
Ab-initio Methods
Hartree-Fock
Method
+ Configuration Interaction
§!H-F - neglects completely
electron correlation
§!H-F+CI – is able to treat
ONLY few electrons
Density Functional Theory
Quantum Monte Carlo
Ø! Existing realizations of DFT allow accurate predictions for large systems Ø! Currently the method of choice in materials science
P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964)
Density Functional Theory (DFT)
The DFT is based on two fundamental theorems for a functional of the one particle density.
!!( !r ) == !! ( !r1, !r2,…,!rN)| !! ( !ˆri!! !r )|!! ( !r1, !r2,…,!rN)
!
i!
== N d!r
!!
2,…,d!rN!!*( !r, !r2,…,!rN)!! ( !r,!r2,…,!rN)One particle density – Basic quantity of DFT
One particle density determines the ground state energy of the system
Modern formulation – constrained-search method of Mel Levy
Mel Levy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 76, No. 12, p.606 (1979).
Density Functional Theory – constrained search formulation
Mel Levy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 76, No. 12, p.606 (1979).
Functional of the one particle density F[!!]! min""
!!!!!
" "
!!| ˆT + ˆV
e!e|" "
!!The functional searches all many particle functions that yield the input density and then delivers the minimum of F [ !] !
!!(!r) T Vˆ ˆ++ e e!!
d!rvext(!r)!!(!r)+
!
F[!!]! E0d!rvext(!r)!!0(!r)+
!
F[!!0]= E0Theorem I
Theorem II E!00 - ground state density
- ground state energy
Let us define function that minimizes "min! " |T V |"! ˆ ˆ++ e e!! !
! !
min ˆ ˆe e min
F [ !]== " |T V |"++ !! F [ ! ]0 == " |T V |"min!0 ˆ ˆ++ e e!! min!0
Proof of Theorem I:
d!rvext(!r)!!(!r)+
!
F[!!]= d!rv!
ext(!r)!!(!r)+!!min"" | ˆT + ˆVe!e|!!min"" == !!min"" | ˆVext+ ˆT + ˆVe!e|!!min"" !E0
Ritz variational principle
Density Functional Theory – constrained search formulation
Proof of Theorem II: E0"" " |Vmin!0 ˆext++ ++T V |"ˆ ˆe e!! min!0
0 0
! !
0 ˆext ˆ ˆe e 0 min ˆext ˆ ˆe e min
" |V ++ ++T V |"!! "" " |V ++ ++T V |"!!
d!r!!ext(!r)!!0(!r)+
!
!!0| ˆT + ˆVe!e|!!0 !!
d!r!!ext(!r)!!0(!r)+!!min""0 | ˆT + ˆVe!e|!!min""00 0
! !
0 ˆ ˆe e 0 min ˆ ˆe e min
" |T V |"++ !! "" " |T V |"++ !!
From variational principle
!0
"min
But, on the other hand, from the definition of
0 0
! !
0 ˆ ˆe e 0 min ˆ ˆe e min
" |T V |"++ !! "" " |T V |"++ !!
0 0
! !
0 ˆ ˆe e 0 min ˆ ˆe e min
" |T V |"!! " |T V |"!!
"
" ++ == ++
d!r!!ext(!r)!!0(!r)+
!
!!0| ˆT + ˆVe"e|!!0 =F[!!0]+ d!r!
!!ext(!r)!!0(!r)!0| ˆVext++ ˆT ++ ˆVe!!e| !0 ==F [ "0] ++ d! r!ext(!
r )!0(!
""
r ) E0==F [ !0] ++ d!r!ext(! r )!0(!
!!
r )0 0
! !
0 min ˆ ˆe e min
F [ ! ]== " |T V |"++ !!
(A) (B) [(A) & (B) true]
Density Functional Theory – Constrained Search Formulation
The ground-state energy minimization procedure of can be divided into two steps
Relation to Ritz Variational Principle
!2
!1
!4
!3
!5 !6
!7
! | H |!ˆ E[! ]
! |!
<< >>
== << >>
! !
0 " N ˆ ˆe e ˆext ! N " ! ˆ ˆe e ˆext
E [" ] min " |T V== "" ++ !! ++V |" ==min min " |T V"" ''%%## "" ++ !! ++V |" $$&&((
Percus-Levy partition of the N-electron Hilbert space
The inner minimization is constrained to all wave functions that give , while the outer minimization releases this constrain by searching all !!!!(!r)(!r)Each shaded area is the set of that integrate to a particular . !!(!r) !
The minimization is over all such points. !!!N
The minimization for a particular is constrained to the shaded area associated with this , and is realized by one point (denoted by ) in this shaded area.
!!!" !
!
Density Functional Theory – Constrained Search Formulation Relation to Ritz Variational Principle
E [ ! ] == F [ ! ] ++ d! r!ext(!
r )!(!
!!
r )In O N E function of 3 variables !!!
In 2
Nwave functions of 3N variables
E0[ ! ] == min" !!N " | ˆT ++ ˆVe""e++ ˆVext|" ====min!!!N##min" !!! "!| ˆT ++ ˆVe""e++ ˆVext|"!
$$%% &&
''((==
==min!!!N min" !!! "!| ˆT ++ ˆVe""e|"! ++ d! r#ext(!
r )!(!
))
r )##$$%% &&
''((==
==min
!!!N[ F [ ! ] ++ dr#!
ext(r )!(! !r )
))
] ====min
!!!NE[ ! ]
Density Functional Theory
PROBLEM: exact functional is unknown ! F [ !]
Thomas-Fermi-Method (probably the oldest approximation to DFT)
F[ !] T [ !] U[ !] E [ !] == ++ ++
xcOne needs a good approximation to F [ !]
{{ }}
! !
! e e ! min e e min
" !
! !
min e e min
ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ
F [ !] min " |T V |" " |T V |"
T [ !] U [ !] " |V |"ˆ U [ !]
!! !!
"
"
!!
== ++ == ++
== ++ ++ !!
Kinetic energy
U[!!]= 12 d!rd!r'!!(!r)!!(!r')
|!r!!r'|
""
Classical Coulomb energy xc
E [ !]
Exchange & Correlation
The functional is universal in the sense that it is independent of the external potential (field) . F [ !] !!ext(!r)
T F
Vee!! [ !] U [ !]""
TT!F[!!]! 35(3!!2)2/3!2
2m
!
d!r[!!(!r)]5/3 and extensions§! Thomas-Fermi-Dirac
§! Thomas-Fermi-Weizsacker
PROBLEM:
Very often these models give even qualitatively wrong results.
TT F!! [ !]
Interacting particles Independent particles
!(!x1, !x2,…, !x1023) !1(x!
1)!2(x!
2)…!3(x!
1023)
Idea: consider electrons as independent particles moving in an effective potential
Density Functional Theory (DFT) in Kohn-Sham realization
This reduction is rigorously possible !
DFT- The Kohn- Sham Method
W. Kohn & L. Sham (1965) invented an ingenious indirect approach to the kinetic- energy functional.
They turned density functional theory into a practical tool for rigorous calculations
W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)
System of interacting
electrons with density
!( !r)
System of non-interacting electrons with the same density!( !r)
The main idea:
“Real” system “Fictitious” or Kohn-Sham reference system
!!(!r)
T [ !] T [ !]
S !!S(!r)=!!(!r)E [ !! ] == d!r!! !!
ext( !r )!!( !r ) ++ T
S[ !! ] ++ U [ !! ] ++ E
xc[ !! ]
xc ee S
E [ !] V [ !] U[ !] T [ !] T [ !] == !! ++ !!
Exchange-correlation functional contains now the difference between kinetic energy functional of interacting and non-interacting electrons.
The Kohn- Sham Method – Kinetic energy functional
Hamiltonian of the non-interacting reference system H
S= ! !
22m
i
!
N! !
i2+ !!
S( !r
i i!
N)
How the looks like ? T [ !]
S!!
S(!r) - local potential
!
! = 1
N! det[ !!
1, !!
2,…, !!
N] ˆh
S!!
i= ! !
22m
! !
2+!!
S(!r)
!
"
# #
$
%
&
&!!
i(!r)=!!
i!!
i(!r) For this system there will be an
exact determinantal ground-state wave function
, where are the N lowest eigenstates of the one-electron Hamiltonian i
!
!! ( !r)= !! *
i( !r)
i=1
!
N!!
i( !r)
The density
T
S[ !! ]= Min
!
!!""
! ! | ˆT | ! ! = Min
!
!!""
##
i|" !
22m
# !
2| !!
ii=1
$
NT [ !]
S- can be defined by the constrained-search formula
The search is over all single-determinantal functions that yield the given density
.!
The existence of the minimum has been proved by Lieb (1982).
!
is uniquely defined for any density.
T [ !]
ST [ !] T [ !]
S!!
! !
Crucial characteristics of the Kohn-Sham Method NOT
The Kohn- Sham Method – Kinetic energy functional
The Kohn-Sham Method: Variational Procedure
We cast the Hohenberg-Kohn variational problem in terms of the one-particle (Kohn-Sham) orbitals
E0==min!!""NE[ !! ] ==
==min!!""N
{{
TS[ !! ] ++U [ !! ] ++ Exc[ !! ] ++ d!r##$$
ext(!r )!!( !r )}}
==min!!""N
{{
[ Min%% ""!! % | ˆT |%% % ] ++U [ !! ] ++ Exc[ !! ] ++ d!r##$$
ext(!r )!!( !r )}}
==min
%
% ""N
{{
TS[%% ] ++U [ !! [%% ]] ++ Exc[ !! [%% ]] ++ d!r##$$
ext(!r )!![%% ]( !r )}}
=={ &&mini}""N((TS[{ &&i}] ++U [ !! [{ &&i}]] ++ Exc[ !! [{ &&i}]] ++
' '
i==1N$$
d!r&&*i(!r )##ext(!r )&&i(!r ) ))**++,, -- The dependence of the density on the orbitals is known ! { ! }i
!(!
r ) == !*i(! r )
i==1
!
N!
!i(r )!Variational search for the minimum of can be equivalently performed in the space of the orbitals .
E [ !]
{ ! }
iDerivation of the Kohn-Sham Equations
Performing variational search for the minimum of one must actually constrain orbitals to be orthonormal E [ !]Conservation of the number of particles Let us define the constrained functional of the N orbitals
d! r!*i(!
r )!j(!
!!
r )== !ij!
![{""i}] == E [##] !! $$ij
j==1
"
N"
i==1
"
N" ##
dr!!!i*(r )!!!j(!r )( )
where are Lagrange multipliers for the constrain ( ).
!
ijE [ !]
For to be minimum, it is necessary that
!"[{ # }] 0
i==
!!
!!""i*(!
r ) E [!!] !! ""ij
j==1
"
N"
i==1
"
N" ##
dr'!!!i*(r')! !!j(r')!$$%%
&&
''((
))==0 !!
!!""i*(!r)= !!##
!!""i*(!r)
!!
!!##
!!!2 2m
"
"
"2++!!ext(! r ) ++!!H(!
r ) ++!!xc(!
## r )
$$%% &&
''((!!i(!
r ) == !!ij""j(! r )
j==1
)
N)
The variational procedure leads to equations:
Note:
!!H(! r ) ==!!U
!!"" == d r'!
!!
|r ""!!!(!r')!r' | !!xc(!
r ) ==""Exc[##]
""##
In Kohn-Sham method exchange-correlation functional can be split into separate exchange and correlation functional E [ !] E [ !] E [ !]xc == x ++ c
Ex[!!] == !! 1
2 d!
""""
rd#
i#
r'!!!i*(!
r ) !!j(! r )!!*j(!
r')
|! r !!!
r' |
#
j$$
#
%%&& '' (())!!i(!
r')
!!xc(!
r ) ==""Ex[##]
""## ++
""Ec[##]
""## == !!x(!
r ) ++ !!c(! r )
ˆHKS== !!
!
2 2m"
!
!2++
!!
KS(!
r ) is hermitian !!
!!
ij is also hermitian Unitary transformation of diagonalizes ,but the density and remain invariant. { ! }i
!
ijˆHKS
ij i ˆKS j
( ! == " | H | " )
!!Kohn-Sham potential (local potential !) KS(
!r ) == !!
ext(!r )++!!
H(!r )++!!
x(!r )++!!
c(!r ) ( == !!
S(!r ) )Derivation of the Kohn-Sham Equations
Exchange energy
functional Correlation energy
functional Exchange
potential Correlation
potential
!! !
22m
"
"
"
2++ !!
ext( !r )++!!
H( !r )++!!
x( !r )++!!
c( !r )
##
$$ %% &&
'' ((!!
i( !r ) == !!
i""
i( !r ) The Kohn- Sham Method –
The Kohn-Sham Equations
!! ( r ) == ! !! *
i( ! r )
i==1
!
N! !!
i( ! r )
!E [ "]x
!" c
!E [ "]
!"
!!H(! r ) ==!!U
!!"" == d r'!
!!
|!r ""!!(!r')! r' |!!ext(!
r ) == ""e2 Zs
|! r ""!
##s""! Rn|
$
s,n$
Schrödinger-like equations with local potential
These equation are nonlinear and must be solved iteratively (self-consistently)
The Kohn- Sham Method – ‚Aufbau‘ principle
HOMO LUMO
! 1
! 2
! N N
! ++1 unoccupied occupied How to calculate one particle density?
The Kohn- Sham Method – The Total Energy
E [ !! ] == !! !2
2m
# #
i==1N""
d"r!!i*(!r )$$!2!!i(!r )++U[ !! ] ++ Ex[ !! ] ++ Ec[ !! ] ++ d!r!!""
ext(!r )!!(!r ) E == !!ii==1
"
N"
## 12%%%%
dr d! !r'$$|(r ##!!r )$$r' |!(r')! ++Ex[$$] ++ Ec[$$] ## d%%
r(! &&x(r ) ++! &&c(!r ))$$(r )!"$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$#$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$% so-called double counting correction
Sum of the one-particle Kohn-Sham energies
Energy of the reference system differs from the energy of ‘real’ system
!!i
i==1
!
N!
== ""i| ""!2 2m"
#
#2++!!KS(! r )|!!i
i==1
!
N!
==TS[""] ++ d!$$
r!!KS(r )! !!(!r )Kohn-Sham energies may be considered as the zero order approximation to the energies of quasi-particles
in the many-particle theory.
Correlation energy functional (also ) is unknown for non-homogeneous systems
Physical meaning of the Kohn-Sham orbital energies ?
!
iThe Kohn- Sham Method – Problems
(Note, these energies were introduced as Lagrange multipliers)E [ !]c
!max
== == !!
µ I!!(! r ) == fi
!
i!
!!i*(r )!!!i(!r ) ii
E !f
!! ==
!!
! ( r )c ! Strictly speaking there is none
The Kohn-Sham orbital energy of the highest occupied level is equal to the minus of the ionization energy,
Extension to non-integer occupation numbers 0 f 1!! i!!
Janak theorem (1978)
E [ !]c -! is known for homogeneous electron gas (constant density)
Interacting particles Independent particles
!(!x1, !x2,…, !x1023) !1(! x1)!2(!
x2)…!3(! x1023)
Idea: consider electrons as independent particles moving in an effective potential
Density Functional Theory (DFT) in Kohn-Sham realization
This reduction is rigorously possible !
DFT- The Kohn- Sham Method
W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965) System of interacting
electrons with density
!(!r)
System of non-interacting electrons with the same density!( !r)
“Real” system “Fictitious” or Kohn-Sham reference system
!!
(r )!
T [ !] T [ !]
S!!
S(!r )== !!( !r )
E[ !! ] == d!r!! !!
ext( !r )!!( !r ) ++T
S[ !! ] ++U [ !! ] ++ E
x[ !! ] ++ E
c[ !! ]
!! ( !
r ) == !! *
i( ! r )
i==1
!
N! !!
i( r ) !
T
s[ !! ] == !! ! 2m
2# #
i==1N"" d"r !!
i*( !r ) $ $ !
2!!
i( !r )
unknown!!!
Ex[
!!
] == !! 12 drd
!
""""
#
i#
r'! !!
i*(r )! !!
j|(r !!!
r )! !! !
r' |*j(r')!
#
j$$ #
%% && '' (( )) !!
i(r')!
DFT: Implementations of the Kohn-Sham Method
Fully relativistic Semi-relativistic Non-relativistic
Non-periodic periodic
All-electron full potential All-electron muffin-tin All-electron PAW Pseudopotential
Non-spin-polarized Spin polarized
Beyond LDA
Generalized Gradient Approximation (GGA) Local Density Approximation (LDA)
GW (quasi-particles) EXX (exact exchange) sX-LDA
Time dependent DFT LDA+U
Atomic orbitals Plane Waves Augmentation Fully numerical (real space)
Gaussians(GTO) Slater type (STO) Numerical Plane waves (FPLAPW) Spherical waves (LMTO, ASW)
! 1 2 "
2+ V
ext( !r) + V
xc( !r)
#
$ % &
' ( !
"= #
"!
"Exchange and Correlation Energy of Homogeneous Electron Gas
s B
r a
!! ""
== ##%% $$&&
1 3 1/ 3 4''((
x x
E == ## !! ""$$ %%&& '' e ==
1/ 3 2 4/ 3 hom
3 3
2 (( )) ((
** x == ## $$ %%!! ""&& '' e
hom 3 3 1/ 3 2 1/ 3
(( 2 ))
**
aB!!
in ( ) 3
"" x s Ry
!! "" r
== ## $$&& %%''1/ 3 in
hom 3 92 1 [ ]
(( 2 4 ))
xhom( )rs == !!0.91633/ [ ]r Rys
""
s s s s s
c s
s s s
A r B Cr r Dr r
r Ry
r r r
++ ++ ++ <<
!!""
== ##""%% ++ ++ $$
for for
hom
1 2
ln ln 1
( ) [ ]
/(1 ) 1
&&
'' (( ((
/
!! ==N ""
Exchange energy per unit volume Exchange energy per particle
!!(! k,!
r ) == 1
!
!eik""!!
Homogeneous electron gas (free electron gas or “jellium”) r
Wave functions: Constant electron density:
Dimensionless parameter characterizing density:
Quantum Monte-Carlo simulations for homogeneous electron gas
Correlation energy per particle
D. M. Ceperly & B. J. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980) Parametrization: J. P. Perdew & A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1981)
A B C D, , , , , ,
!! "" ""
1 2- fitted parametersLocal Density Approximation (LDA)
E
xcLDA[!!] == d!r !! !!(!r)""
xchom(!!( !r))
xchom==
xhom++
chom!! !! !!
In atoms, molecules, and solids the electron density is not homogeneous
!(r)
r
1! = !
1( ) r
1r
!
1 The main idea of theLocal Density Approximation
: the density is treated locally as constantGGA - Gradient Corrections to LDA
Gradient Expansion Approximation
ExcGEA[ !! ] == E
xcLDA[ !! ]++ d !
r!! !! (
r )C!
xc[ !! ]| !! !! !! (
r )! (
r ) |!
4/32] E
xcGGA[!!] == d!r !! f
xc(!!(!r),!!!!(!r))
Generalized Gradient Approximation
J. P. Perdew & Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 33, 8800 (1986) D. C. Langreth & M. J. Mehl, Phys. Rev. B 28, 1809 (1983)
f
xc-!constructed to fulfill maximal number of “summation rules”Exchange-correlation potential can be calculated very easily, since explicit dependence of Exc on the density is known. !!
xc