• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

“On the distribution of s-dimensional Kronecker sequences”

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "“On the distribution of s-dimensional Kronecker sequences”"

Copied!
3
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

ACTA ARITHMETICA LX.1 (1991)

Corrigendum to the paper

“On the distribution of s-dimensional Kronecker sequences”

Acta Arith. 51 (1988), 335–347

by

Gerhard Larcher (Salzburg)

In the paper “On the distribution of s-dimensional Kronecker sequences”

(Acta Arith. 51 (1988), 335–347) there are some inaccuracies in the proofs and also in the statement of some results. In the following I will give a cor- rection of these errors. I want to thank very much G. Turnwald in T¨ ubingen who has pointed out these inaccuracies in Math. Reviews 90f:11065.

First of all, on page 336, p j and θ j should be defined in the form α j = p j

q + θ j

q · q i+1 1/s for j = 1, . . . , s with |θ j | ≤ 1 ,

and on page 337, Γ i should be defined as the lattice spanned by ( p q

1

, . . . , p q

s

) and by Z s .

In the proof of Lemma 2 the assumption (p 1 , q) = 1 actually is a restric- tion of generality, so that I give another proof.

P r o o f o f L e m m a 2. We have det(Γ i ) = 1/q. Let F be a covering of R s by fundamental regions F of Γ i . Let B be a convex set in I s . The area of the set of all F ∈ F for which the intersection with the boundary of B is not empty, is at most c(s)λ s , with an absolute constant c(s). Because to every F in the interior of B we can attach exactly one point w q on the boundary of F , and since λ(F ) = 1/q, we have J q ≤ c 3 (s)λ s .

As a lower bound for J q we get quite analogously to the method in [2], Beispiel c, applied to the lattice Γ i :

c 4 (s) qλ 1 λ 2 . . . λ s−1

≤ J q .

By the Theorem of Minkowski on successive minima and because of M q

0

λ 1 ≤ s 1/2 M q

0

the result follows.

(2)

94 G. L a r c h e r

Since Davenport and Mahler [1] actually have shown that for every pair (α 1 , α 2 ) of reals, for every ε > 0, there are infinitely many q, p 1 , p 2 ∈ Z with

α i = p i

q + θ i

q 3/2 , i = 1, 2, and θ 2 1 + θ 2 2 ≤ 2 23 1/2 + ε, Lemma 8 in [3] has to be stated in the following form:

Lemma 8. For all (α 1 , α 2 ) ∈ R 2 we have lim sup

N →∞

N 1/2 J N ≥ 1 2



1 − 2 23 1/4



= 0.0433 . . .

For the “only if” part of Theorem 1 we need a Lemma 7a instead of Lemma 7.

Lemma 7a. Let i ∈ N and q := q i be such that 4s 1/2 qM q λ 1 . . . λ s−1 ≤ 1.

Then with an absolute constant c(s) we have for N = Bq with B :=

[1/(4s 1/2 qM q λ 1 . . . λ s−1 )]:

N J N ≥ c(s)

qM q (λ 1 . . . λ s−1 ) 2 .

P r o o f follows directly from the proof of Lemma 7 in [3].

P r o o f o f t h e “o n l y i f ” p a r t o f T h e o r e m 1. If L is not extremal, then for every ε > 0 there is a q with q 1/s M q < ε.

By Minkowski’s Theorem on successive minima we have λ 1 . . . λ s−1 q 1−1/s < c 1 for every q (c 1 := c 1 (s) > 0).

Let ε < (4s 1/2 c 1 ) −1 . Then for q as above we have 4s 1/2 qM q λ 1 . . . λ s−1 ≤ 1.

Therefore Lemma 7a holds and with N = Bq we have N 1/s J N ≥ 1

(Bq) 1−1/s · c(s)

qM q (λ 1 . . . λ s−1 ) 2 ≥ c 2 (s) ε 1/s and the result follows.

A corrected form of Theorem 2(a) is the following (Theorem 2(b) is not true in the stated form):

Theorem 2a. If for a c 1 > 0 and a σ ≥ 1/2 we have q i+1 σ M q

i

≥ c 1 for all i, then for all N we have

N 1−σ(s−1) J N ≤ c 2 ( max

i≤i(N ) a i ) 1−σ(s−1) .

(Here i(N ) is such that q i(N ) ≤ N < q i(N )+1 .)

(3)

Distribution of s-dimensional Kronecker sequences 95

P r o o f. By Lemma 6 we have, with τ := σ(s − 1), N 1−τ J N ≤ c 8

r

X

i=1

b i

b τ r · q i τ q τ r (q i σ M q

i−1

) s−1

≤ c 9



b 1−τ r + b 1−τ r−1 + b 1−τ r−2  q r−1

q r

 τ

+ . . .



≤ c 9 ( max

i≤i(N ) a i ) 1−τ .

Finally, from the new form of Theorem 2a we now have

Theorem 3. For s ≥ 2 and for almost all (α 1 , . . . , α s ) in R s in the sense of Lebesgue measure, we have for every ε > 0

J N = O(N −1/s (log N ) (1/s)+ε ).

References

[1] H. D a v e n p o r t and K. M a h l e r, Simultaneous Diophantine approximation, Duke Math. J. 13 (1946), 105–111.

[2] G. L a r c h e r, ¨ Uber die isotrope Diskrepanz von Folgen, Arch. Math. (Basel) 46 (1986), 240–249.

[3] —, On the distribution of s-dimensional Kronecker sequences, Acta Arith. 51 (1988), 335–347.

INSTITUT F ¨ UR MATHEMATIK UNIVERSIT ¨ AT SALZBURG HELLBRUNNERSTRAßE 34 A-5020 SALZBURG, AUSTRIA

Received on 5.2.1991 (2117)

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

It is well known (see for instance [1]) that if (X n ) is a weakly convergent sequence of random variables then the sequence of probability distributions (p X n ) is

The relative bias and relative root mean square error of estimators obtained with the method of maximum likelihood they are smaller than when using the least squares method for

2. Dense parallelepipeds on the circle. 2.3].) The parallelepiped is d-dimensional if the sequence (α n ) is of finite length d, and infinite-dimensional if the sequence is

We construct infinite-dimensional chains that are L 1 good for almost sure convergence, which settles a question raised in this journal [N].. It follows that such a chain with

These point sets are obtained from rational functions over finite fields and, as the recent cal- culations of Hansen, Mullen, and Niederreiter [5] have shown, possess excel-

They investigated the arithmetic properties of Q A and, in particular, they proved the following theorem:..

Ф айн лей б, Локальные теоремы с остаточным членов для одного класса арифметических функций, Acta Math.. N iven, Uniform distribution of sequences of

I t means that this intersection is such that it connects all intersections by straight lines parallel to Oy axis.. Conditions for existence of two-dimensional