• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Ultrasonography for the prediction of extension of trophoblastic infiltration into the tubal wall in ampullary pregnancy

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Ultrasonography for the prediction of extension of trophoblastic infiltration into the tubal wall in ampullary pregnancy"

Copied!
5
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)Ginekol Pol. 2015, 86, 16-20. P R A C E O R Y G I N A L N E poł ożn i ct wo. Ultrasonography for the prediction of extension of trophoblastic infiltration into the tubal wall in ampullary pregnancy Ultrasonografia w przewidywaniu rozległości nacieku trofoblastu w obręb ściany jajowodu w ciąży bańkowej  1 

(2)  2 1 2 1 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey. Department of Pathology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.. Abstract Objective: Predictive factors of damage to the Fallopian tube may guide the treatment for patients with tubal pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of ultrasonographic findings in patients affected by ampullary pregnancy for the determination of the depth of trophoblastic infiltration into the tubal wall on histological examination. Material and methods: 38 patients with ampullary pregnancy undergoing salpingectomy were enrolled into the study. The patients were divided into two subgroups depending on their transvaginal sonography (TVS) findings; either an ectopic gestational sac containing an embryo with cardiac activity or those with a tubal ring. The ampullary pregnancies were histologically classified according to the depth of infiltration of trophoblastic tissue into the tubal wall as follows: stage I: limited to mucosa; stage II: extension to the muscularis layer; stage III: complete infiltration of the tubal wall with or without rupture of the serosa. The association between findings on TVS and stage of trophoblastic invasion, serum beta-human chorionic gonodatropin (`-hCG) levels was evaluated. Results: Although there was no significant difference among two groups in terms of histological stage of trophoblastic infiltration (p=0.257), patients in whom an embryo with cardiac activity had been identified were found to have higher percentage of stage II (47.8%) or stage III (8.7%) invasion. However, there was a significant difference in serum `-hCG levels on the day of surgery among the two groups (p=0.028). Conclusions: Ultrasonographic aspect of ampullary pregnancy is associated with depth of trophoblastic infiltration into the tubal wall and serum `-hCG levels.. Key words: ampullary pregnancy /  

(3)    / / transvaginal sonography /. Address for correspondence: Onur Erol Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya,Turkey. tel.: 09-0242-2494400, Fax: 0-242-2494422 e-mail:dronurerol@hotmail.com. 16. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. Otrzymano: 09.07.2014 Zaakceptowano do druku: 15.08.2014. Nr 1/2015.

(4) Ginekol Pol. 2015, 86, 16-20. P R A C E. O R Y G I N A L N E po ł o ż n i c t wo. Onur Erol et al. Ultrasonography for the prediction of extension of trophoblastic infiltration into the tubal wall in ampullary pregnancy.. Streszczenie Cel: Czynniki predykcyjne zniszczenia jajowodu mogą być pomocne w leczeniu pacjentek z ciążą jajowodową. Celem badania była ocena wartości prognostycznej badania ultrasonograficznego u pacjentek z ciążą bańkową dla określenia rozległości naciekania trofoblastu w obręb ściany jajowodu potwierdzonego w badaniu histopatologicznym. Materiał i metoda: Do badania włączono 38 pacjentek z ciążą bańkową, u których wykonano usunięcie jajowodu. Pacjentki podzielono na dwie podgrupy pod względem różnych obrazów ultrasonograficznych; jeden z widocznym pęcherzykiem ciążowym i z zarodkiem z czynnością serca, drugi z widocznym pierścieniem jajowodowym. Ciąże bańkowe podzielono na podstawie wyniku histopatologicznego, pod względem głębokości nacieku trofoblastu w ścianę jajowodu: stopień I: ograniczone do śluzówki, stopień II: przechodzące na mięśniówkę, stopień III: całkowite nacieczenie ściany jajowodu z /bez pęknięcia surowicówki. Oceniono związek pomiędzy obrazem ultrasonograficznym, stopniem nacieczenia ściany jajowodu oraz poziomem surowiczego beta hCG. Wyniki: Nie znaleziono istotnych różnic pomiędzy badanymi grupami pod względem histologicznie ocenionego nacieku trofoblastu (p=0,257). Jednak kobiety, u których stwierdzano żywy zarodek częściej miały stopień II (47,8%) lub III (8,7%) inwazji trofoblastu. Znaleziono również istotną różnicę poziomu beta-hCG w dniu operacji pomiędzy dwoma grupami (p=0,028). Wnioski: Pewne ultrasonograficzne aspekty ciąży bańkowej są związane z głębokością inwazji trofoblastu w ścianę jajowodu oraz surowiczym beta-hCG.. Słowa kluczowe:

(5)    / inwazja trofoblastu / /    

(6)  /. Introduction 

(7)  !"# 

(8) $  %  

(9)    

(10) "  "

(11)   #

(12) & ' 

(13)   ! "

(14) #!

(15)  % 

(16)  

(17) 

(18) $

(19) ( 

(20) $&)

(21) 

(22) "( 

(23) 

(24) *

(25)  +,(! "  

(26)   

(27)  !-    " ( (

(28)

(29)  .+/&0

(30) 3( ("# 

(31) 

(32)  "

(33) (#

(34) %    #

(35) 

(36) 4"

(37)  " *  

(38) % ""

(39)   #

(40)  $    (

(41) ""

(42)    " (

(43) 

(44) "#

(45) .5/&  "

(46) 

(47) "

(48) "$

(49) "

(50)  % 

(51) "!

(52) 

(53) & 

(54) "

(55)  

(56)   

(57)  # 

(58) (

(59)  #

(60)    % )6" 

(61) 

(62) "

(63) 7 # &) 

(64) 

(65) #

(66) " 

(67) 8

(68) ($

(69) 

(70)      $ "   ( 9:,  +;;, .<  =/& >  % 

(71)   "     "

(72)   

(73)   $   

(74) 

(75)  

(76)  

(77)  

(78)   

(79) %   

(80) "(  (

(81)   "( !%

(82)  !"

(83)  *   "&>  

(84) ( (

(85)  "? +&$ 

(86) $ 

(87) %#

(88) 

(89)   % ""$

(90)  

(91)  

(92) 

(93)   

(94)   " 

(95) #

(96) $ $? 5& 

(97) " *

(98)   $ $

(99) %% #

(100) 

(101)   $""

(102)   

(103) #(%  

(104) * #

(105) ? <&

(106)  

(107)   

(108) 

(109) $!

(110) "

(111)  

(112) #

(113) &)  

(114) 8  

(115) 8"

(116) ( 

(117) 

(118) *

(119) 

(120) #$+;;, 

(121) 8

(122) &    

(123)     $  

(124)   

(125) "% *

(126)  "*  # ! 

(127) 8

(128) .:/& Nr 1/2015. '

(129) 

(130)  

(131)   "

(132)   

(133)  "(

(134)    

(135)      "

(136) #

(137)    

(138)  (

(139)  ( "

(140) "   (

(141)   

(142) 4 #$$ #"

(143)  $  !

(144)   .@  A/& B

(145) 

(146)  ( $  (

(147)  

(148)    (

(149)  

(150) " """($  

(151) 

(152) 8 

(153) 

(154) $  ! .C 9/&)*

(155) (

(156)  

(157) 

(158) #

(159)     

(160) ( 8

(161)  

(162) # #(   

(163) # #(    

(164) .+; ++/&. Objectives ) 

(165) #

(166) ""

(167) 

(168) ("

(169) 

(170) ( "($  

(171) 

(172) 8 

(173) 

(174) $ ! 

(175) &) 

(176) $D

(177) #(

(178)  "! # "

(179) 

(180) ##  (   

(181)  8"

(182)  

(183)  

(184)   ((" $   ("

(185) 

(186) ("($  

(187) 

(188) % 8 

(189) 

(190) $ ! &. Material and methods E  % 

(191)   " !  ""  

(192)   !

(193)   "

(194) 

(195) ($ 

(196)  

(197) !"% !  

(198) $!F5;;C" $5;+< E )

(199) 

(200) "0 G 

(201)  &)

(202)  

(203) %  ( 

(204)  

(205) 

(206)  #"  "  "  

(207)   ! "

(208) 

(209) #

(210) ""

(211) "

(212) (" & ' 

(213)  

(214) 

(215) 

(216)   " ! "

(217) 

(218)  ( $  

(219)     

(220)   "

(221)   

(222)      

(223)  $        ( H%7 # "(  "" 

(224) 

(225) ( 

(226)  $)68"(( !

(227) ! 

(228)  I

(229) 

(230)  

(231)   

(232) 

(233) $ !

(234) "

(235) 

(236) #

(237) $ 

(238) &* 

(239) 

(240) 

(241) !   !

(242) 

(243)  

(244) # 

(245) #

(246)  

(247)  8"

(248)  "

(249)   

(250) ("

(251)     " (

(252)  &. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. 17.

(253) Ginekol Pol. 2015, 86, 16-20. P R A C E O R Y G I N A L N E poł ożn i ct wo. Onur Erol et al. Ultrasonography for the prediction of extension of trophoblastic infiltration into the tubal wall in ampullary pregnancy.. )  

(254)    

(255)  !  $ "   

(256) 

(257)       

(258)  8"

(259)     

(260) 

(261)   (  $ $ "

(262)    (  $  !  !

(263)  

(264) $  "

(265)   "

(266) 

(267) (  $   H%7 #  (  

(268)   "   

(269) -  ( "

(270) #

(271) &E  ( 

(272)  ! $ "     

(273) "& )6*

(274) 

(275)  !("

(276) A&:%G % #

(277)   $ J

(278) : ? 7 "

(279)      

(280) !3  K' >E&)

(281) (

(282)  ! "

(283) "$% 

(284) 

(285)    *

(286) &) 

(287)   ! "

(288) #

(289) ""

(290)  ! $%  ""

(291) 

(292) )68"

(293)  I+

(294)  

(295)   

(296) 

(297) $!

(298) "

(299) 

(300) #

(301) B

(302) +E" 5 !

(303) $ 

(304) B

(305) +L& H%7 # !M

(306) 8"!

(307) !%

(308) 

(309) % 

(310)  

(311)  $ ""

(312)  "!

(313) % 

(314) ME >

(315)  ® *'C;;'  ?)E%  ) H%7E ?L3 

(316)  

(317)  

(318)   7& )

(319) % "

(320) %  (8

(321)   ( #

(322) 

(323)  !=&+,"+&<,  

(324) # & B !

(325)   

(326)     #"!8*"

(327)  +;, (

(328)  " 

(329) " 

(330)   (

(331)  

(332)  

(333)   

(334) &E#(

(335)  

(336)   

(337) "!

(338) *

(339) % 

(340) !   "&G

(341)  

(342)    ! ("$

(343)  *

(344) " 

(345) !! !(

(346) 

(347)   $ "

(348) 

(349)  

(350) 

(351)   (  

(352)  & E %  

(353)   !  

(354) 8" 

(355)  

(356)   "

(357)    "($  

(358) 

(359) 8 

(360) 

(361) $ !  ( !  .+5/I' $  

(362) 

(363) 8 

(364) 

(365) 

(366) "$   B

(367)  5E?  ''  $  

(368) 

(369) 8 

(370)  *""   $   

(371) B

(372) 5L?'''  

(373) 8 

(374) ( $ ! !

(375) !

(376) (  B

(377) 5& ) 

(378) 

(379) $!8"

(380)  )6 

(381) $  

(382) $!

(383) "

(384) 

(385) #

(386)  " (% $  

(387) 

(388) 8 

(389)  !  # "&  ! 

(390) " 

(391)    """#

(392) 

(393)  "

(394)  

(395) 

(396)  *

(397) "  #  (

(398)  #  &"- t% !  " # "

(399) ((

(400)  $! &  

(401) %M "%K

(402) > ! "( 

(403) (

(404)  &

(405) 

(406)   

(407) ! (" %

(408)  

(409) 

(410)  3(K

(411) "! #&+C&; '& 

(412)  'J >E&)  ! 

(413) "" 

(414) 

(415)  

(416) 

(417) 8!p# !   ;&;:&. Results E (59@ 

(418) #  (!"""%

(419)  "

(420) "&(  5:C

(421)  !

(422)  ""

(423)    

(424)  (  ( !

(425)    I +;    !  $  

(426)  ?@  !$ $ 

(427)  ? +:

(428)  !"$  

(429)  ?+;=

(430)  

(431) #" *? 5;  

(432)   ! " * ? <: 

(433)  "

(434) "3!*"(

(435)     % 

(436) " 

(437) :C  )68"

(438)  !" 

(439) $"  !

(440)  

(441) "  *

(442)   $"" !

(443)  $  %   

(444) * #

(445) "#

(446) 

(447)  

(448)  +;   

(449) 

(450)  !

(451) 

(452)   *

(453) ($  

(454) 

(455) 8 

(456) 

(457) $ !  "$ 8"& )

(458) %

(459)  

(460)   ( 8 " 

(461)  

(462)  

(463) 

(464)  "!  "

(465) 

(466) 

(467)  "&. 18. A. B Figure 1. Ultrasonographic aspects of tubal pregnancy. A – An ectopic gestational sac containing an embryo with cardiac activity. B – Tubal ring with peritrophoblastic flow.. )(

(468)  ! <+&AN:&+   5<%=: " 

(469)  

(470) ( 

(471) % 

(472) 

(473) ! =<&AN+5&@"  5:%9+" 

(474) 

(475)  " 

(476) &0"

(477)   

(478)   (% 

(479)  +:<9&=,   !"$ 

(480)  

(481) 

(482) 

(483)  5<@;&@,  $!

(484) "

(485) 

(486) #

(487) ! ""& )"

(488) ( (!  "

(489) )$  '&O

(490) 

(491) 8"

(492) (( !("

(493)  (   $ 

(494) 

(495)   

(496)   "

(497)  

(498)  #%  ! 

(499) 

(500) 8"

(501) (( 

(502)  H%7 #  "( ! P;&;5C& E(  

(503)  

(504)  # 

(505)   5; 

(506)   :5&@, !"  '

(507) 8 

(508)   +@ =5&+, "  ''  " 5 :&<, " '''&

(509)  

(510) !$ 

(511) "$

(512) "

(513) 8"! ("#

(514) @@&A,( '

(515) 8 

(516)   ! 

(517)    

(518)   ! !"  $ !

(519)  "

(520)  

(521) #

(522) )6 ''=A&C,!  (M8"

(523) & O#  

(524) 

(525) 8"

(526) ((! ("!  

(527)  (

(528)  

(529)   ($  

(530) 

(531) 8 

(532)  )$ ''&. Discussion E  

(533)  

(534) #

(535)   $ " % ""(  #

(536) # "   ("((

(537) # 

(538) #.+</&"

(539) 

(540) "    

(541)  #

(542) ((

(543)

(544) " #

(545) "( 

(546)  

(547)  "

(548) $ &. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. Nr 1/2015.

(549) Ginekol Pol. 2015, 86, 16-20. P R A C E. O R Y G I N A L N E po ł o ż n i c t wo. Onur Erol et al. Ultrasonography for the prediction of extension of trophoblastic infiltration into the tubal wall in ampullary pregnancy.. Table I. Comparison of demographic features, gestational age, ectopic mass size and serum-hCG level among study groups. &KDUDFWHULVWLF. 7XEDOULQJ Q 

(550). (PEU\RZLWKFDUGLDF DFWLYLW\ Q 

(551). pYDOXH.

(552) 

(553)

(554) .

(555) . . . . . 

(556) . 

(557) .  .  a Gravidia. . Parity  . . . 

(558)  .  .

(559) .

(560)  . .

(561)  . ... ./. !"!#.  $##  % &#'()*#+,-#  a *. b. – Mean values with standart deviations (SD); – Values are given as median (range), Mann-Whitney U test was used; – Statistically significant. Table II. Histological stage according to ultrasonographic aspects of ectopic mass. Data are given as number (percentage), Pearson Chi-Square test was used.. A. +LVWRORJLFDO VWDJH. 7XEDOULQJ Q 

(562). (PEU\RZLWKFDUGLDF DFWLYLW\ Q 

(563). I. . 

(564) . II. 

(565)

(566) 

(567) . .. III. –. .. B. pYDOXH. . C. Figure 2. Histopathologic photomicrographs of the fallopian tube affected by ectopic pregnancy and classification according to the depth of infiltration of the trophoblastic tissue. A – Stage I, trophoblastic invasion limited to the tubal mucosa. Magnification x 100; hematoxylin-eosin (HE). B – Stage II, trophoblastic tissue extends to the tubal muscularis. Magnification x 200; HE. C – Stage III, Complete tubal wall infiltration. Magnification x 200; HE.. ( #$

(568) "" 

(569)  "

(570)   ($ " "($  

(571) 

(572) #

(573) 

(574) $ !  "  

(575) (

(576)  !!

(577) $8( #

(578) #% 

(579) I

(580)  *

(581) 

(582)  8"

(583)  )6  ( $ !

(584)  "

(585)  

(586) #

(587)   

(588)   

(589)  " 4

(590) "

(591)  (     H%7 #  

(592)  " #  "

(593)  !(&( ( $  "  "

(594)     ( 

(595)  

(596)  

(597)  

(598)   B % 

(599) $.+= +:/&  (   

(600)  #

(601) $  

(602)   "

(603) # 

(604) (!!

(605) $ 

(606) "

(607) 

(608) ( $&'"

(609)  *( 

(610) % 

(611) #

(612) (

(613) "

(614) 

(615) ($

(616)  3

(617) & Nr 1/2015. E 

(618)  

(619)  ( $  

(620)  

(621) 

(622)   $  !  

(623) 

(624)  #

(625) "  (

(626)      #  "  

(627)   

(628)  

(629)  # "$)6 " %  H%7 #  !

(630)   " ( $  

(631) 

(632) #

(633) 

(634)  $ ! .9 +@/&7 

(635)  "

(636)  

(637)  

(638)  "

(639) (* $  %"

(640) " 

(641) # # " * (  $  "

(642) 

(643) &  H%7 # 

(644)    3 ( $   

(645) #

(646)  " 4 

(647)  $

(648)

(649) $ ! &)"

(650) #

(651) ( $ ! 

(652) 

(653) 

(654)  # ($  

(655)  

(656) ""

(657)  (

(658) ( #

(659) #% 

(660) 

(661)  "&. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. 19.

(662) Ginekol Pol. 2015, 86, 16-20. P R A C E O R Y G I N A L N E poł ożn i ct wo. Onur Erol et al. Ultrasonography for the prediction of extension of trophoblastic infiltration into the tubal wall in ampullary pregnancy.. )6

(663) !

(664) 

(665) "

(666) (

(667) ("

(668) %

(669) (

(670) &9;,(

(671) 

(672)    "$#

(673) 

(674) ")6

(675) .+A/&)

(676)   

(677)  

(678) $!($ 

(679)  )6 

(680) ( " 7 # 

(681) 

(682) & '

(683)  "+5;!!

(684) 

(685) 

(686)  

(687) %  &.+C/(" 7 #  "!

(688) 

(689)  (

(690)  

(691)    $!

(692) "

(693) (

(694) %  "*   &'""

(695) 

(696)    "  ($ 

(697) !  

(698) "!

(699) $ 

(700) 

(701) "    $" #

(702) #  ! 

(703) "% 

(704) 8

(705) ( "*  !  " (B 

(706) $

(707) 55,(  &' $  " #

(708) 

(709) 

(710) (

(711)    

(712)   "# 

(713) 

(714) $( 

(715)   

(716)  #

(717) 

(718) "(

(719)

(720) 

(721) .+9/&

(722)  &.5;/ "  

(723)  "

(724)  (  $ !

(725)  "

(726)  

(727) #

(728) !    "!

(729)  '''

(730) 8 

(731) & "

(732)  

(733)  ""

(734)  !

(735)  

(736) 8)68"

(737)         "*    # $" 

(738)  8"%

(739) "

(740) " ($!

(741) "

(742)  

(743) #

(744) )6

(745) "

(746) 

(747) $ ( $ ".+5 5+/&8"

(748)  

(749) "!

(750) #

(751) %   (

(752) ($!

(753) "

(754) 

(755) #

(756)  )6

(757) 

(758)  !

(759)  ''

(760) 8 

(761) "!

(762)   !

(763)   '

(764) 8 

(765) & ' ""

(766) 

(767)    $  

(768)  !     (M8"

(769) 

(770) 

(771)  !

(772)  '

(773) 8 

(774) &'  #

(775)   "

(776)  $!

(777) "

(778) 

(779) #

(780) ! 

(781) "

(782) 8"

(783)  

(784)  !

(785)  8

(786)  $  

(787) 

(788) #

(789)  '&O "" "

(790) 8"

(791) & '

(792)  "!

(793) "  

(794)  !

(795)   

(796) *

(797) 

(798) ($  

(799)  

(800) & 

(801) "

(802)   "

(803) (( 

(804)    (  ( 

(805)  $

(806)  

(807)  "

(808) 

(809)  $  

(810) 

(811) $ "

(812) ((

(813) $ 

(814) &'""

(815) 

(816)  !"

(817) ""%  ! 

(818) 8)68"

(819)  ($  

(820)  $ 

(821) $!

(822) "

(823) 

(824) #

(825) &)

(826) 

(827) 

(828) 

(829) 

(830)  ( " 

(831)  

(832) " *

(833)   

(834)    

(835) ($   

(836)  *

(837) 

(838) &. Conclusions  

(839)     

(840)     (

(841)  "

(842) % ( 

(843) 

(844) $! H%7 # "8"

(845)    )6

(846)  & K

(847) (  

(848)   #  ( H%7 " $!

(849) "

(850) 

(851) #

(852) )6

(853) "

(854) 

(855) $  ($ "    $

(856) "% "

(857)  

(858) 

(859)  &. Authors’ statement ³ >RS] S] ^Y MO\^SPc ^RK^ ^RO Z_LVSMK^SYX aSVV XY^ `SYVK^O ^RO MYZc\SQR^] YP K. third party, as understood according to the Act in the matter of copyright and related rights of 14 February 1994, Official Journal 2006, No. 90, Clause 63, with respect to the text, data, tables and illustrations (graphs, figures, photographs); ³ ^RO\O S] XY mMYX»SM^ YP SX^O\O]^]p aRSMR YMM_\] aROX ^RO K_^RY\ \OWKSX] SX. a financial or personal relationship which unjustly affects his/her actions associated with the publication of the manuscript; ³ KXc ZY]]SLVO \OVK^SYX]RSZ] YP ^RO K_^RY\] aS^R ^RO ZK\^cZK\^SO]. interested in the publication of the manuscript are revealed in the text of the article; ³ ^RO WKX_]M\SZ^ RK] XY^ LOOX Z_LVS]RON SX Y\ ]_LWS^^ON ^Y KXc Y^RO\. journal. Source of financing: None. References 1. Barnhart KT. Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361, 379-387. 2. Ankum WM, Mol BW, Van der Veen F, [et al.]. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a metaanalysis. Fertil Steril. 1996, 65, 1093-1099. 3. Cacciatore B, Ylostalo P, Stenman UH, Widholm O. Suspected ectopic pregnancy: ultrasound findings and hCG levels assessed by an immunofluorometric assay. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988, 95, 497-502. 4.. Aleem FA, DeFazio M, Gintautas J. Endovaginal sonography for the early diagnosis of intrauterine and ectopic pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 1990, 5, 755-758.. 5. Levine D. Ectopic pregnancy. Radiology. 2007, 245, 385-397. 6. Green LK, Kott ML. Histopathologic findings in ectopic tubal pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1989, 8, 255-262. 7. Dubuisson JB, Aubriot FX, Cardone V, Vacher-Lavenu MC. Tubal causes of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1986, 46, 970-972. 8. Oktay K, Brzyski RG, Miller EB, Krugman D. Association of serum beta-hCG levels with myosalpingeal invasion and viable trophoblast mass in tubal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1994, 84, 803-806. 9. Klein M, Graf A, Kiss H, [et al.]. The relation between depth of trophoblastic invasion and betaHCG levels in tubal pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1995, 256, 85-88. 10. Dietl J, Buchholz F, Kindler PA. Histopathology of tubal pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1988, 27, 385-388. 11. Stock RJ. Tubal pregnancy. Associated histopathology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1991, 18, 73-94. 12. Natale A, Candiani M, Merlo D, [et al.]. Human chorionic gonadotropin level as a predictor of trophoblastic infiltration into the tubal wall in ectopic pregnancy: a blinded study. Fertil Steril. 2003, 79, 981-986. 13. Hoover KW, Tao G, Kent CK. Trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 115, 495-502. 14. Cabar FR, Pereira PP, Schultz R, [et al.]. Vascular endothelial growth factor and -human chorionic gonadotropin are associated with trophoblastic invasion into the tubal wall in ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2010, 94, 1595-1600. 15. Turgut EN, Celik E, Celik S, [et al.]. Could serum -hCG levels and gestational age be the indicative factors for the prediction of the degree of trophoblastic invasion into tubal wall in unruptured ampullary pregnancies? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013, 287,323-328. 16. Oktay K, Brzyski RG, Miller EB, Krugman D. Association of serum beta-hCG levels with myosalpingeal invasion and viable trophoblast mass in tubal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1994, 84, 803-806. 17. Kirk E, Papageorghiou AT, Condous G, [et al.]. The diagnostic effectiveness of an initial transvaginal scan in detecting ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2007, 22, 28224-28228. 18. Cacciatore B. Can the status of tubal pregnancy be predicted with transvaginal sonography? A prospective comparison of sonographic, surgical, and serum hCG findings. Radiology. 1990, 177, 481-484.. Authors’ contribution: 1. Onur Erol – analysis, assumptions, study design, interpretation of data, corresponding author. 2. Dinc Suren – he played role in material and methods, he made histochemical analysis and revised article critically. 3. Mehmet Karaca – he played role in acquisition of data and interpretation of data. 4. Cem Sezer – he played role in revising article critically.. 20. 19. Kirk E, Daemen A, Papageorghiou A, [et al.]. Why are some ectopic pregnancies characterized as pregnancies of unknown location at the initial transvaginal ultrasound examination? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008, 87,1150-1154. 20. Pereira PP, Cabar FR, Schultz R, Zugaib M. Association between ultrasound findings and extent of trophoblastic invasion into the tubal wall in ampullary pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 33, 472-476. 21. Cabar FR, Pereira PP, Schultz R, Zugaib M. Predictive factors of trophoblastic invasion into the ampullary region of the tubal wall in ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2006, 21, 2426-2431.. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. Nr 1/2015.

(860)

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Among the most frequent pain syndromes of the lower limb, the authors described the ones in which the involvement of the tendinous sheaths and of the synovial bursae is the

A 33-year-old primipara, primigesta, with a history of multiple ovarian cysts surgery (including the last laparoscopic dermoid cysts excision five years ago), was admitted to

The surmised risk factors for ectopic implantation include advanced maternal age, endometriosis, a history of adnexitis, a history of tubal pregnancies and tubal surgeries,

Uznanymi wskazaniami do bada- nia USG w pulmonologii są: zmiany w obrębie ścia- ny klatki piersiowej, zmiany opłucnowe i zmiany przyścienne w samym miąższu płucnym, chociaż

zacje respondentek na oddziałach patologii ciąży korelują z oceną poszczególnych obszarów opieki, natomiast nie wpływają na globalną ocenę jakości opieki położniczej

Ultrasound evaluation does not only facilitate an accurate diagno- sis, but also helps to select patients most likely to benefit from methotrexate treatment, as opposed to those with

The objec- tive of this study was to determine the interrater reliability of musculoskeletal ultrasonography for the assessment of the mid-portion of the Achilles tendon:

The aim of this study was to evaluate usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in differentiating between compression from the outside and intramural lesions in the wall of