• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

EN Official Journal of the European Communities

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "EN Official Journal of the European Communities "

Copied!
2
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

EN Official Journal of the European Communities

31. 3. 1999 L 87/1

(Acts adopted pursuant to Title VI of the Treaty on European Union)

JOINT POSITION of 29 March 1999

defined by the Council on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the proposed United Nations convention against organised crime

(1999/235/JHA) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles K.3(2) and K.5 thereof,

Recognising the importance of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and of police cooperation for the purposes of preventing and combating all serious forms of international crime, as provided for in Article K.1 of the Treaty,

Whereas the Member States regard the combating of organised crime as a matter of common interest;

Whereas the European Council meeting in Amsterdam in June 1997 approved the Action Plan of the High-Level Group on Organised Crime which contains extensive proposals for strengthening the fight against organised crime;

Whereas account must be taken of the measures that have already been adopted by the European Union or are in the course of preparation or adoption for the purpose of implementing that Action Plan and, in particular, Joint Action 98/733/JHA of 21 December 1998 on making it a criminal offence to participate in a criminal organisation in the Member States of the European Union (

1

);

Whereas arrangements have been made for the develop- ment and negotiation of a United Nations convention to combat organised crime;

Whereas the Council in its Conclusions of 5 October 1998 requested the Presidency to propose one or several Joint Positions, in accordance with Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, in relation to the draft United Nations convention and its protocols;

Whereas it is desired to contribute as fully as possible to the negotiation of the proposed convention and to avoid incompatibility between the proposed convention and instruments drawn up in the Union,

HAS DEFINED THIS JOINT POSITION:

Article 1

1. Member States shall support the drawing up of the proposed United Nations convention against organised crime and any possible protocols. Member States shall advocate the inclusion in the draft convention of provi- sions which will facilitate to the maximum extent possible the effective prevention, prosecution and invest- igation of organised crime.

2. Member States shall ensure that the provisions of the draft convention relating to the obligation to crim- inalise particular activities are consistent in particular with Articles 1 and 2 of Joint Action 98/733/JHA.

3. Insofar as the other provisions of the draft conven- tion are concerned, it should apply as broadly as possible to the activities of criminal organisations and to inter- national cooperation for combating such organisations. In principle, the relevant provisions of the draft convention should encompass the activities of persons, acting in concert with a view to committing serious crime, involved in any criminal organisation which has a structure and is, or has been, established for a certain period of time. They should not be limited to groups with a highly developed structure or enduring nature, such as mafia type organ- isations; and the organisations need not necessarily have formally defined roles for their participants or continuity of membership.

(

1

) OJ L 351, 29. 12. 1998, p. 1.

(2)

EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31. 3. 1999 L 87/2

4. The provisions to be included in the draft conven- tion on international cooperation should provide appro- priate safeguards for the protection of human rights and facilitate such cooperation. They should apply in a situa- tion where, due to the fact that an investigation is at a preliminary stage, it is not possible for a requested state to establish with certainty that a particular offence is connected to organised crime. It might also be useful if certain criteria were to be specified for the purpose of indicating links with organised crime.

5. Insofar as measures to combat money laundering are concerned, the convention should extend to a broad range of offences and, in particular, should be consistent with the 40 recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force.

6. Any provisions in the draft convention which deal with criminal assets should not be inconsistent with, and should take account of, Joint Action 98/699/JHA of 3 December 1998 on money laundering, the identification, tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumental- ities and the proceeds from crime (

1

).

7. The relevant provisions of the draft convention could, as appropriate, be modelled on the 1998 United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. In addition they should take full account of the 1990 Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confisca- tion of the Proceeds from Crime.

Article 2

In the negotiations on the proposed United Nations convention and any possible protocols, Member States shall, as far as is practicable, coordinate their positions, at

the Presidency’s initiative, and seek to arrive at common standpoints on all issues which have significant implica- tions for the interests of the Union. The Commission shall be fully associated with this work. When necessary, in the light of the manner in which the negotiations develop, consideration shall be given to which further steps need to be taken.

Article 3

Member States shall ensure that the provisions of the proposed United Nations convention and any possible protocols are not inconsistent with instruments drawn up between them.

Article 4

The Council shall endeavour to achieve further Joint Positions, as necessary, in relation to the draft convention and particularly in connection with any possible proto- cols.

Article 5

This Joint Position shall be published in the Official Journal.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 1999.

For the Council The President F. MÜNTEFERING

(

1

) OJ L 333, 9. 12. 1998, p. 1.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Jest niesprzeczny, pełny (A jest tautologią zawsze i tylko wtedy, gdy A jest dowodliwe), rozstrzygalny (istnieje pro­ cedura wykazywania tautologiczności, która

Postępując za przyjętą metodą Autor przedstawił wzorzec strukturalny tonu oraz omówił jego klauzule dyferencyjne w badanych antyfonarzach, które zebrał w siedem

Fakt, że ryzyko operacyjne jest ściśle związane ze specyfiką danej instytu- cji, w związku z czym pełny wgląd w sytuację banku w zakresie tej kategorii

Synchronizacja środków, jakie władze Rzeszy, w tym także zwierzchnictwo sił zbroj­ nych, zastosowały w celu mobilizacji Niemców na rzecz wysiłku wojennego,

Co do mechanizmów kształtow ania się jednostek plemiennych, Graus słusznie podnosi, iż w najnowszej historiografii (i to zarówno w badaniach nad Germ anam i, jak

Kategoria ta obejmuje migrantów adaptujących się do warunków Brexitu, którzy tak naprawdę postrzegają wyjście Wielkiej Brytanii ze struktur Unii Europejskiej jako

L analyse pragmatique du corpus (d’une centaine de slogans publicitaires franęais) a demontre que 1’injonction reste cachee dans la plupart des phrases et que

'The United Kingdom delegation declares that for the purposes of the application of the Joint Action by the United Kingdom , and taking into account the provisions and