DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
Report 5-78-9
Contribution of the fibres to
the load bearing capacity
of a bar- and
fibre-reinforced concrete beam
by
Dr. Ing. H.W. Reinhardt
STEVIN LABORATORY
CONCRETE STRUCTURES
^ ^ ^ v^A "/ 5 ^^ S^-y<P^(4 Bibliotheek
^ afd. Civiele Techniek T.H. Stevinweg 1 - Delft.
Report 5-78-9
D e l f t , J u l y 1978
*f O
Contribution of the fibres to the load bearing capacity of a bar-and fibre-reinforced concrete beam
by
Dr.-Ing. H.W. Reinhardt
^V^
Contribution of the fibres to the load bearing capacity of a bar-and fibre-reinforced concrete beam
by H.W. Reinhardt
1. INTRODUCTION
In a concrete beam which is subjected to pure bending it is assumed that
- cross sections remain plain (Bernoulli's law) - strain distribution is linear (Navier's law)
These two assumptions are correct in the uncracked stage, but become approximations in the cracked stage. Because of the benefit of simplicity they will be used for both stages.
The stress distribution depends on the mechanical proper-ties of the materials in which the beam consists. In the elastic uncracked stage, the elastic moduli of the mate-rials are the determining quantities whereas in the cracked stage the bond properties of the reinforcing steel, the pull-out behaviour of the fibres and the shape of the stress-strain diagram of the concrete play the important roles. In the following, three cases will be considered: the
linear elastic cracked stage, the nonlinear elastic cracked stage emd the nonlineea" elastic plastic cracked stage.
THE LINEAR ELASTIC CRACKED STAGE
Prom tensile tests / l / it is known that the stress-strain diagram of a fibre reinforced concrete can be given sche-matically like fig. 1. It shows a linearly increasing
Fig. 1. Schematic o'-£-diagram of fibre reinforced con-crete in tension.
branch and a horizontal branch, similar to a mild steel with a pronounced yield point. The "yield point" here is
the cracking stress and the horizontal line is due to the pull-out resistance of the fibres.
Using such a relation for the concrete in the tensile zone of a beam, the contribution of the fibres can be described or can be determined from test data.
Por thatJ the following strain and stress distribution are used, fig. 2.
Pig, 2, Strain and stress distribution in a cross
section.
According to fig, 2 the upper strain £, , leads to a
compressive concrete stress c^ whereas the lower strain
leads to a tensile stress C . in the concrete. Because
ct
of the relation of fig. 1 the tensile stress block is
taken constant over the whole tensile zone, so neglecting
the real behaviour around the neutral axis.
The contribution of the fibres can be concentrated in a
tensile force T . The force in the bar reinforcement is T .
c s
The compressive force is C.
The following expressions eire got
C = -è- b X4,E^
* ' c
(1)
assuming a constant modulus of elasticity of concrete E ,
Gand
T^ = b (h - x) . C^^
s s s s
(2)
(3)
- 4
The steel strain £ and the height of the compressive
zone T( are derived from fig. 2 and become resp.
(1 -ÏÏ )(^.-^,) + £)
I,
'r^^
(4a)
(4h)
where £^ is a negative and ^^Is a positive strain.
In the cross section the equilibrium of forces must be valid,
Thus
C + T + T„ = 0
c s
(5)
With eqs. (l) through (4) and after some rearrangement eq. (5)
becomes
~ y^
'r^z -^
^^ ^^n^'r^ht ^ Vx[(i-U^.-^0-^J="
The reinforcement ratio can be expressed in
s - ^
(7)
Using this relation, eq, (6) becomes
2J_ — 1 1 — r
1 '•z
>- TTzh
- ? ^ 4 O - M H - O ^ ^ , ]
-
o
(2)
Assumed, that in a test program the quantities E , E , f , c, h
are given and the top amd bottom strains £, and Sj^are measured,
then the contribution «T* , on the fibre concrete can be
deter-ct
mined,
Another relation, which must also hold true, is the
equilibrium of moments in a cross section, i.e, the
external bending moment must be equal to the internal
moment :
M
ex
M. .
xnt
(9)
Making use of the notation in fig, 2, the internal moment
in respect to the compressive force C is given by
M
int
^c
(^-h-x
- | ) -hT^ ( h - c - | ) (10)
U
After inserting eqs. (2) through (4) and rearranging eq. (IO)
one gets with eq. (9) the expression for the moment
equili-brium:
? -
\i
^r^i
t'i
£ ,-£.
?f4^'-r)(vO-,][(-t]-i 1^1
If in a test program the values for M , B , b, c, h , P are
ex s J
given and if £ and &^ are measured, the contribution of the
fibres e' . can be calculated.
ct
do
In fact, eqs, (8) and (II) are two independent relations which
can be used for determining the fibre contribution. S o , one
given or measured quantity could be omitted,
Such a case is the following where the surface strains are
not measured, but, instead of them, the mid span deflection
is determined in the experiment. Then both eqs, (8) and (11)
are needed for the evaluation,
6
-Let us consider a pure bending zone with length -d and
mid span deflection f (fig, 3 ) , The known relation between
f , ^j and
circle with
r a d i u s r
Pig, 3, Deflection in a pure bending zone.
the radius of the circle r is
r..4f
(12)
which becomes for 4/- ^< t
(13)
The curvature ^ is then
3£ = a —-1-
(14)
In terms of strains.the curvature is
je = <f^-<£,
(15)
and the strain difference becomes
If in eq. (8) the strain difference is replaced by eq. (16) it becomes
2- 5£ ^
5 £,
[iu'c) ^
* 2, ]=o (17)
X
A similajT manipulation of eq. (ll) leads to the new expression
( « )
Prom this set of second order algebraic equations,it is
pos-ti
sible to calculate ^ . and £ if the quanties M , E , E , b, c*c ' ex c s c, hf f are given and the curvature ?€, (or the mid span de-flection) is meastired,
The way to solve this set of equations is enclosed in the appendix,
THE NONLINEAR ELASTIC CRACKED STAGE
Up till now the concrete (in compression) and the steel were assiimed to show a linear el astic behaviour. In fact, that is only true till approximately a third of the concrete strength, B§-ond that limit the c-£ line is curved. In fig. 4 the strain and stress distribution are given in the nonlinear cracked sta-te, The only difference to fig. 2 is that the distance e, of the compressive force is no longer j x but some function of x depending on the shape of the <ƒ-<£-diagram of concrete.
^
Pig. 4» NonlineajT elastic cracked stage.
The first term in eq. (8) which represents the compressive
force of the concrete becomes
^,- ^x
'.-U^>)
(19)
where ^(^,) stands for an integration factor.
So, the whole eq.(8) gets the form
^^'0-['-^J«;. ^?e[;^6=-o.^,7.o
f -£.
(20)
^(^€,j can be taken from graphs or formulae / 2 / , it is for
instance ^E in the linear case and -r E for a parabolic
C 3 C£=f,
<r - ê - l i n e .
Bibliotheek
afd. Civiele Techniek T.H. Stevinweg 1 - Delft
Eq.(ll) for the moment equilibrium has also to be ajusted
to the new center of gravity of the compressive stresses.
That can be done by two coefficients ^^ and -h^ which
de-pend also on the shape of the «r-£-line, Eq,(ll) becomes
then
i * ^''^]^f'4-t^'•-'^''•li('-^ri^ftJ'
- !"U^
.(21)
^1 is illustrated by fig, 5, and ^ = ^ ~ k » Por the
li-near
center
of gravity
Pig, 5» Compressive stresses in the beam and stress center
of gravity,
case 4, =3 -r and -4
^ 3 -I
for a parabolic shape i^s -g and -^^ =
/
The same processing can be applied on eqs. (1?) and (18),
where the curvature «. is introduced inst ead of the individual
strains.
-
10-4.
THE NONLINEAR ELASTIC PLASTIC CRACKED STAGEIf the stress in the reinforcing steel reaches the yield point, the elastic stage goes over into the plastic stage. All equations can thei?. be maintained if the modulus of
elasticity of steel E^ is correctly interpreted. Pig. 6 illustrates that E is a constant value up to the yield point and starts to be a variable beyond this point.
Pig. 6. Definition of E in the post yield stage, s
That means that E depends on «•, or £, ^respectively^ and-the type of steel has to be kept in mind.
STATIC BEiroiNG TESTS
M a t e r i a l s
Static bending tests were caxvled out on beams with
150 X 100 mm in cross—section and with a free span of
2000 mm. The beams were loaded with two symmetric loads.
In the pure bending zone the top and bottom strains were
measured by means of electrical extensometers.
The beams were made from steel fibre reinforced concrete
and wete additionally reinforced by continuous bars. The
types of fibres used are shown in fig. 7 together with
the corresponding
1,4 V.
25
-A
J^
0,4
mm
0,9 •/•
1.5
J: -T
M^
25
T
30
- ^0"
0,4
mm
1.5 7,
L l l .
42
50
^ 9S
0,8
mm
4
Pig. 7. Types of fibres used.
percentages by volume. The steel quality of the bars was a
FeSSoo with diameters of 4. ^ or 10 mm, resulting in
reinforcement ratios of 0^11%, 0,75^, and 2,09^ resp.
12
-The concrete mix consisted of 400 kg/m type A Portland cement, round sand and gravel aggregate with a maximum size of 16 mm. The v/ater cement ratio was 0,48, The cylinder strength of the various batches fluctuated between 41 and 45 N/mm ,
The modulus of elasticity of the three types of concrete was practically the same as can be seen from fig. 8, The tests were done on cylinders with a height of 400 ram and a diameter
of 150 mm, 50 Nlmm iO 30 20 10 0 -0 I 2 3 4 S S C 'U
Pig, 8. stress-strain—curves of the concretes used,
5,2, Contribution of the fibres
Eq. (8) was used for the analysis of the test results.
Prom this the contribution of the fibres could be calculated taking E = 2,G.10^ N/mm and E = 2,1.10^ N/mm , and c and h
c s as measured an the beams,
Prom the results^ it could be clearly distincted between the uncracked state and the cracked state. In table 1, the average results of the two conditions are listed dependent on the percentage of bar reinforcement and the tsrpe of fibres. The individual results are given in the appendix,
1
Type of fibres : Q
0,17
straight i 0,75
i 2,09
.. 0,17hooked 0,75
' 2,09
paddled
0,17
0.75
2,09
ö'ct N/mm
uncracked cracked
i1,12
1,15
1,22
0,87
0,85
0,67
0,76
2,20
2,54
2,86
2,99
1.84
1,41
2,90
2,25
1,47
Table 1, Contribution of the fibres,
In the iincracked state^ the calculated contribution of the fibres is mucdi less than in the cracked state. This difference can be interpreted by the fact that the strain in the outmost fibre does only reach 0,25?Sowhat means that the stress distri-bution as assumed in fig, 2 is not quite correct, A trian-gular stress distribution in the tensile zone would be a better approach,
V/hen cracks are formed and the tensile strain reaches values up to 2%e , the assumed stress distribution certainly does much
closer correspond with the reality. The calculated contribution is equal to the uniaxial tensile strength of the concrete with. straight fibres and reaches about 8 5 ^ of the uniaxial tensile strength of the concrete with hooked and paddled fibres.
14
-At this moment, no comments will be given on the in-fluence of the percentage of the bar reinforcement. A good discussion of the results can only take place when
some possible scatter in the material properties have been considered.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Based on a linear strain distribution and on results from ^ensiie testi^ a stress distribution in bar and fibre reinforced concrete beams subjected to pure ben-ding is discussed. In this model the contribution of the fibres is schematized by a rectangle. The theory was applied to experimental results, and it turned out that the calcïulated contribution of the fibres reaches 85 till 100^ of the uniaxial tensile strength of the fibre reinforced concrete,
It can be concluded that this simple model describes the real behaviour with sufficient accuracy, at least in the
cracked elastic stage.
REFERENCES
/ I / Shah, S.P. et al. Complete stress-strain curves for steel fibre reinforced concrete in uniaxial tension and compression. Intern. Symp. on Testing and Test Methods of Pibre Cement Composites, Sheffield 1978.
/ 2 / Leonhardt, P., Monni g, E. Vorlesungen iiber Massiv-bau. Vol. 1, Springer Berlin - New York 1973.
16
-APPENDIX
Al, Determination of e and o* , from -st only
The two relevant equations are
'^-^) ^ - ^,J -
(AI)
Isolate ö', in eq. ( A 1 )
Replace ^ . in eq. (A2) by right hand side of eq. (A3)
^ U"!
Rearrange eq. ( A 4 ) making use of k..=5— /(^
'^ 1 1 1 .
0
,' < r ^ t.'.^ USimpli-fy the equation and get
t # ^ ' ' " ^ ^ ^ ' ^^^sh> -^i^^L-'-^^]^,
-^ ?6-^3e
^-c
i i ^ '
1 - ^ . 0
2. r _J ) (
Prom this cubic equation £. can be calculated for a
measured *€ , All other quantities like
rC^^t
•= , E , h, c,
* 3
M must be given,
Generally there aj&three roots of eq. ( A 6 ) , one of which
is the right one. That c, must be put in eq, (A3) in order
to get the contribution of the fibres c'.,
A2, Individual results,
£ upper concrete strain in %o
£ steel bar strain in ^o
^ . contribution of the fibres as calculated by eq, (8) in
2
N/mm
A
e percenteige of b a r r e i n f o r c e m e n t ('s* = TÏT )
Hooked fibres
Straight fibres
? =
- ^ ,0,14
0,33
0,64
0,89
0,17^
h
0,18
0,58
1,53
2,66
S^t
1,12
1,93
2,38
(2,28)
S"
- ^0,03
0,11
0,12
0,16
0,38
0.56
0.72
0,82
0,17fo
^ :0,02
0,15
0,15
0,25
0,55
0,97
1,57
2,06
<^ct0,66
0.76
0.97
1.03
2.75
3,25
3,14
2.83
18
-^ =
0,13%
-^, h
^ct
0,09 0,07 1.15
0.42 0,53 2,44
0,95 1,61 2,64
e
= 2,09^
- ^0,10
0,34
0,57
1,72
^s
0,06
0,26
0,47
1,94
<^ct
1,22
2,60
3,60
2,39
Paddled fibres
f
= 0,17^
- 2 , 0,04 0,08 0,19 0,38 0,52 0,69 0,87 ^s 0,06 0,14 0,31 0,56 1,03 1,48 2,11 ^ct 0,32 0,53 1,15 2,69 2,63 3,07 3,22(O
=. 0,75^
-^, 0,08 0,37 0,59 0,89 1.25 ^r 0,09 0.51 0,96 1,65 2,61 ^ t 0,54 1,79 1,94 1,82 ( 1 . 1 3 )f = 2,09%
-•?. ^s ^ t
0.34 0,35 0,85
0,96 1,09 1,16
2,32 2,73 1,65
- 2 , 0,22 0,34 0,53 0,85 1.13 ^ 5 0,19 0,43 0,79 1,41 2,07 ^ c t 2,19 1,89 2,16 2,61 2,39