• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Grand children receive the share of a child if he/she does not live to opening of the succession  II – lack of children – spouse (1/2) and parents (1/4 + ¼

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Grand children receive the share of a child if he/she does not live to opening of the succession  II – lack of children – spouse (1/2) and parents (1/4 + ¼"

Copied!
9
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Succession

(2)

General rule:

Succession includes private rights and duties

do not includes public law obligations

(criminal penalties, fines, administrative fees etc.)

taxes – legal act „Ordynacja podatkowa”

provides that tax due pass upon the person’s death on heirs accordind to civil law

regulations

(3)

Title to succession

Legal title to succession results from the law (civil code) or last will

Statutory succession to the entire property takes place if there is no last will, it is invalid or none of the persons named in last will is able or wants to be an heir

Property is acquired by an heir on the

oppening of the succession = the moment of death.

(4)

An heir may be delared by a court unworthy to succeed – crime against the deceased or to last will

A person who is not alive at the time of

opening the succession (moment of death) cannot be an heir. A child that has already been conceived can be an heir if it is born alive.

A person may reject the succession within 6 months time.

A person may waive succession by a contract (notary form) with the succesor

(5)

Statutory succession - groups

I – children and spouse (1/4) – equal shares.

Grand children receive the share of a child if he/she does not live to opening of the

succession

II – lack of children – spouse (1/2) and parents (1/4 + ¼)

III lack of children and spouse – parents (1/2 + ½)

In case a parent does not live – his shares goes to siblings in equal parts.

(6)

Example:

John has died in 2013, his father has died in 2009. He has a mother and one sister (the same mother and father) and one brother from second marriage of his mother (the same mother only).

Calculate shares.

(7)

Statutory succession - groups

IV – no children, spouse, parents and siblings – grandparents (1/4 + ¼ +1/4 +1/4).

V – if grandparents does not live his share

goes to his descendants in equal parts (uncle, aunt, or his /her children cousins)

VI – stepchild (child of the spouse if it is an orphant)

Municipality of the last place of residence

Treasury

(8)

Applying the UE procedural regulations

referring to matters of succession into Polish procedural law –

REGULATION (EU) No 650/2012 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 4 July 2012

on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in

matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession

(9)

I phase – shares: Court - decision on

establishing acquisition of inheritance or

I phase – shares: Notary – notary act estabilishing acquisition if the estate.

= Coownership in shares

II phase – division of the estate – contractual or juridicial

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

A female consumer is subject to the opinion of the media - the world is a world of consumption externality and the woman tries to meet that ideal.. When she fails she

Tania is the ……….got top marks for the projects he’d done.. There is no milk in

(d) Copy and complete the following table, which gives a probability distribution for the

For this reason it is highly recommended to use the IFML model originally used for the front–end code generation to generate test case scenario code just by using a different

To generalise the Fox fundamental trope or the Artin–Mazur fundamental pro-group of a space we consider a fun- damental pro-groupoid π crs(X) and a category pro(π crs(X), Sets) which

Thus eigenfunctions of the Fourier transform defined by the negative definite form −x 2 in one variable are the same as eigenfunctions of the classical in- verse Fourier

In Section 2 we describe some classical results concerning uniqueness, including the famous Salem–Zygmund characterization of perfect symmetric sets of constant ratio which are sets

Since the identity (x + y)y = y in Theorem 1.1 is nonregular we see that according to the last lemma we consider in the sequel bi-near-semilattices with one absorption