1.-'!^'.
r - / • . • „ : • ••
P1993-18
1
EMBE
1
EUROPORT DIESEL ENGINE SYMPOSIUM '93 - MOTOR 2000
16th & 17th November 1993/Amsterdam
An Overview of the Environmental Situation Conceming
Combustion Engines
J.5. Carlton *
Abstract
The paper considers the emergence of diesel engine exhaust eniissicm regulatipns for
the marine industry and some of the implications of introducing these regulations.
The discussion centres on four interrelated aspects: the fonnat and possible structure
of regulations tpgether with the methods of implementation; the availability of
technology to meet these requirements; the implications for safety and the design of
ships. The arguments are primarily centred on the immediate concerns of the oxides
of nitrogen and sulphur, h o w l e r , the paper also examines the issues suirounding
the PÜier exhaust gas speaes.
Introduction
In recent years there hàs been a growing public awareness of the importance of the
sea's riesoùroes and the influsice of pollution on these resources. Legislative and
technical activities conceming ships have traditionally focused on üte pollution of the
sea. Howeyer, latterly äie 'dean ship' philosophy, which introduced the wider
conœpts of air pollution and contributions to the global 'greenhouse effecf, has
assiuned a niuch greater importance. In response to public (pinion, govenunents are
coitsidering the form and means of implementiiig legislation in the marine Held; the
Intemational Mantime Organization (IMO) effectively began formal consideration of
this matter during the 29th Session of tiie Marine Environmental Protection
Committee (MEPC) in 1990,
Senior Principal Stûveyor and Head of Technical Inyestigabon, l^opulsion and &iyironinantal Engineering Departinent Uoyd's Register, London and also Chainnan of the CM AC Exhaust Enüssion Contrats Workihg Group.
2
The devélopment of the marine d i ^ e l engine has to a very large extent been
dominated by the pursuit of enhanced fuel efficiency. Whilst this has had a beneficial
influCTce on carbon dioxide emissions, the reverse is true for the oxides of nitrogen
(NO^) due to the trend> amongst other parameters, of increasing cylinder pressures
and temperatures and decreasing crankshaft speeds for slow speed engines which
lead to conditions which promote the formation óf NO^ within the cylinder. Coupled
with this aspect, the trends in recent years with regard to fuel quality have been
ecohoxnically rather environmentally driven. Consequentiy, following on from the
public and governmental interest in envirorunental consavation, cpnsiderable public
sector and privately funded research has been initiated; a summary, althou^ not
complete, of some of the known work being tmdertaken in Europe is given ih [1].
This overview cpn^ders the parallel development of legislative and technological
activity and eöideavPurs to draw conclusions based on the extensive work cunentiy
being imdertak^ in this field.
Emission Regulations
In the short tierm, legislative and regulatory intarest is centring oh lintitations for the
oxides of nitrogen and sülphür, however, it may be that controls for caibon dioxide,
hydrocarbons and particulate einisisicms will feature in the medium to long tenn;
perhaps in dte form of an iterative cyde.
Currentiy, there are several proposals for the limitations of the oxides of hitrogjen and
sulphur; some regionally based and those of an international character, the most
notable of which are those currentiy being formulated by IMG. The riature of the
NO^ proposal h-om IMO is still a matter for agreement during the cozriihg year or so.
One proposal, however, which has been widely quoted and was submitted for
consideration durihg MEPC.30 is titat of a 30% reduction m total N O . emissions from
the marine industry by the year 2000. Such a concept presents a formidable challa:ige
for the marine industry; not so much for new engines where a reduction Of this
order is possible within the foreseeable development of engineermg tedmology, but
for existing toimage. Although cunent thirücing is prindpally centred oh measüries
for new engines, tiie current ratk) óf new fo existing ships shows that a ppinparatively
limited overall effect on NO^ can be achieved in the short term from regulations
aimed at new ships alone. Table 1 shows the number of new ships built dihihg 1992
as compared to existing ships for all known vessels of 100 toimœ DWT and over
from Lloyd's Register's data base of ship statistics:
New Vesseb En<>tlng Vesaäs Vesseb laid up
Wmdwr of Slips 1422 78304 441
Table 1 - Numbers of Vesels over 100 tonnes DWT in 1992
Based on this d a ^ and sub-grouping the ships info slow and medium speed engines,
tlie potential for overall reductipn can be estmiated using tiie enüssion factors
presented in [2]. This shows, for example, that if a 30% reduction in the N O .
emissions was introduced for new engines this would lead to an overall marine
industry reduction of around 1 % in the first year. Alternatively, if the reduction were
inaeased to 80% then this would pnly cprrespond to approximately a 2.5% reduction.
Clearly, tiiese effects would then be cumulative in successive years as fleet
replacement took place.
Geographical factors, tiie distributipii and nature of industrial conurbations and
public p^ceptioh highlight particular areas of the globe as being particularly sensitive
from an enviroiunaital and ecological point of view. Notable in this respect are parts
of the western seaboard of the Urüted States of America and the Baltic Sea. In
additiori, maritime transport pattems tend to concentrate tragic in particular sea areas
such as the English Channel and Straits of Malacca. Emission densities in these
4
regions can locally be relatively high as seen, for example, i n [3J. Qearly, from the
marine industry viewpoint, due to its international character, e?diaust ernission
regulations are best framed such that a single coinmon system of emission controls
applies throughout tiie world wherever regulations are required. The IMO through
the forum of the Marine Environmental Protection Committee is an obvious
mechanisih for this, assuniing that a satisfactory level of agreement can be reached.
Ahy difierent approach involving administrations working separately will introduce
additional complexity into rriaritime operaticm, in terms of both the implementation
and the auditing of compliarice to regulations, and this will ultimately be reflected
ih transport coste and operational flexibility. Nevertheless, from thé foregoing
discussion it is clear that soihe areas will require special attention and this pould be
achieved tiirough a spedal area framework similar to that used i n the MARPOL
73/78 Convention [4],
In the case of particular ports, many aie consid^ing and some have impleniented
environniehtal schemes as a meajis of controllihg emissions from ships vàîdïst in the
areas u i u i ^ thdr jurisdiction. The need for undertaîong this action dearly depends
on the relative significance of marine enüssions compared to those from land based
sources and the prevailing climatic and geographic infiuences. In the particular case
studied in [5] the need is dearly less than in other areas subject to intense inarine
activity.
When formulating emission regulations, whether these are on a global, regional or
local level, it is particularly impprtant that a consistent framework is adopted and
tiiat the details of the regulations reflect the cunent or antidpated engineering
capabilities at the time of their introduction. $ubsequentiy, regulations can then be
sti^ngthened and maintained to be 'in-line' with the developrhent of tedinoiogy for
newbuildings.
The additional levels of complexity introduced by sonrie abatement technologies riiust
be viewed in the context pf the operational safety of the vessel as well as in terms of
their environmoital benefit. The cunent and predicted short-fall of qualified engineer
officers [6] is critical ih this respect; particularly where a technique danahds ain
in-depth knowledge of engine operation, chraxücal processes or the handling of
potentially hazardpus substeoices. As a general prihdple it should be ensured that
the technology assodated with the abatement tedmiques adopted is comparable with
that of the systems ih which it is to be installed; in particular, the r ^ t i v e l y siniple
systems assodated with some smaller vessels should not be unduly aictimbef ed with
highly complex emission control equiprhent Furthérmore, legislative requirements
should be l>ased on diaracteristics proven by service conditions ^ o e , frequentiy,
these may invalidate the results obtained in the ixipre carfully controlled test-bed
conditions.
Characterisation of N O . Emissions
The formation of oxides of lütrogen occurs as a result of dther the oxidation of
molecular nitrogen in the combustion air or of orgarüc rütrogen in the fud. In the
latter case, it would be antidpated that the bulk of the or^mic rütrogen would be
6
oxidised within the combustion proems and, dejTendent upon the hature of the fuel,
orgarüc rütrogen may account for a sigrüficant proportion of the total N O . enüssions,
particularly for engines op>erating on heavy fud.. When considering the oxidation of
atmospheric nitrogen the reaction will be influenced by Ipcal œnditions in the
combustion chamber with inaeased production of lütric oxide (NO) favoured at high
temperatures ahd optimal air-to-fud ratios. Subsequentiy, during the passage of the
gases through the exhaust system a proportion of the lutric OJdde will be converted
to lütrogen dioxide (NO^); typically this will be of the order of 5 to 10%.
^multaneously, a limited proportion óf lütrous pxide (NjO) will also be formed.
After expulsion from the exhaust stack, furtiier oxidation of the nitric oxide will
continue uhder ambiént conditions tp form additional amounts of nitrogen dioxide.
Conditions within the combustion chamber greatly influence tiie formation of lütric
oxide. Peak pressures and temperatures, injection rate and time for the combustion
process are inajor détenhinante in the basic processes of N O . formation. The average
steady state émission factors reported i n [2], and reproduced for cony^ence below,
illustrate tiie distinction between the broad categories pf slow speed and medium
speed engines measured under normal service operating conditions.
[ Canbustfon Spvctes Médium %aed Slow Spaed
foxides of Nitrogen (NOk) Carbon Monoxide (CO) 1 Hydiocazbon (HO 13^ 1.8 0.6 Î8.7
2.1
OS
Table 2 - Emission Factors for Medium and Slow Speed Diesd Engines (g/kW.h)
Independentiy, attempts by two nujor engine manufacturer assodations [7,8 and 9]
to characterise N O . emissions from engines have led to tiie development of limitation
proposals dep>endént On design crankshaft speed. Both the European and Japanese
proposals are derived from the rnonitoring of the anission behaviour of current
engine designs and result in proposals for N O . linüte having a coinmon mathematical
form fbr engine speeds below 1200 rpm as follows:
NOx = x.(RPM) '' g/kWh Equ. 1
where the coeffidents x and y are shown in Table 3.
ORIGIN
X
yEUROMOT:
1) At MCR using Z3iesel Fuel 30.97 0.167
ii) At Propeller U w (E3 Cyt^) using 3423 0.167
OLesdFud JAPAN:
At MCR Coonditipn 45.00 02
Table 3 - EUROMOT and JICEF N O . Limitation Proposals
frispection of the values quoted in Table 3 shows that the Japahese proposal leads to
a more relaxed liinitatfon> particulariy for low RPM values, tiian dther of tiie
EUROMOT proposals. At higher RPM values there is a tendency for the Japanese
and EIJROMOT-Ë3 cyde curves to converge. However, both equations are intehded
to represent a valid Umit on NO. emissions. The difrérènce in the coeffidents x and
y reflect^ therefpre, differing views between the Japanese and European
mahufacturers on the extrapolation of their existing databases of engine emissions
towards achievable levds at the time of implementation of the legislation.
Equation 1 has an exponential chara.cter and, consequentiy, when thé revolutions tend
toward low values then the proposed liimting mission values tend to inaease.
Wlulst this relationship follows the underlying laws of physics over the speed range
8
pf the engines upon which it was based, deairly, this tendency, if extrapolated too far
towards the origin, leads both to enoneous limiting values and also to a
misrepresentation of the undalying physics. Consequentiy, there is a need för an
upper bound on emission levels to be introduced for very low rotational speeds.
An aitemative view on N O . emission limit characterisation has been expressed by one
major medium speed diesd engine manufactura* group and this has foimd s t i j ^ r t
with some ship Owners. This is to establish a common N O . emission limit in the
regioii of 12-14 g/kWh which is independeht Of rotational speed, size or otha- factors
and to ap>proach this constant emission state by means of a step-wise approach based
on ship type and duty.
The N O . characterisation so far discussed rdates to new engines under test bed
conditions. In the case of marine engines thé in-sa^rice performance is normaUy
cydic ih its character dependihg on the period between overhauls which is frequentiy
related to docking cycles. N O . emissions reflect this periodic maintenance sdiedule
along with other combustion spedes; the most notable being carbon monoxide and
hydrocarbons. In the case, however, of N O . emissions a reduction in concentration
of the order of 3ÖQ to 400 ppm is quite possible over a maihtenance cyde. In addition
to the nonnal periodic maintenance cycle, engine modifications which may occur
during the Ufe of the vessd can also influence N O . production. For example, the use
of difrerent atcnhisers can introduce variations of the order of 10% in N O . production.
^^.•••"^^.••"•••^'-v'w,
ambient conditions are also known to affect tiie N O . ahissipns cpnsiderably. In test
bed trials on a medium speed diesd engine [10] the influaice of ambient and recdver
air temperature, barometric pressuie and air humidity was investigated. From this
research it was demonstrated that NO. emissions can bé more than 40% higher in the
wintar in Northern Europe than in the tropics using tiie same engine at the sarne
power. Such a result> therefore, has much significance for the implementation of any
N O . limitation proposals ih terms of the need for the introdUctfon of suitable
oonection factors.
N O , Reduction Techniqaes
N O . reduction tedmiques essentially faU into :two categories; primary methods
involving action within the engine and secondary methods which dther address the
cleaning up of tiie exhaust gases pr, altemativdy, tiie reduction of emissipns by
changing the opa'ational characteristics of the ship. A sdection of thé primary
reduction metiiods a^^ailable can be seen in Table 4.
Engine Timing
Ddàyed Fud Injection
Injection Rate Characteristics
Charge Air Pressure Increase
Charge Air Temperatiu-e Deaease
Exhaust Gas Redrculatipn
Multi-Point Injection
Cómbüstioh Air Conditioiüng
Inlet Air Hurhidification
Oil Fud-Water Emulsions
Oil Fud-Water Sequential or Simultaneous In ection
10
In tiie case of new nijachiiiery installations, their design, given suffident development
resources, could be expected to achieve a nonünal 30% reduction m N O . production
by primary methods. Notwithstanding this, many of the tedmiques Usted in Table
4 are ciirrehtiy the subject of research and develppment initiative; for example, the
adtievement of an appropriate balance between N O ^ and particulate emissions
and their dependence on f u d injection rate. Altemativdy, the attainment of an
optimal balance between oil-fuel and wabâr quantities and timing m sequaitial or
simultaneous injection methods for slow speed engines. In the case of water injection
inethods the provision of suffident quantities pf high grade water is a complemaitary
consideration which n<eed not riecessarily be a problem on large ships but may be
more difficult to achieve on smaUer vessels.
Engines designed and buüt l>efpre the mid 1970s were generaUy less fUd effident and
had relativdy low N O . levels within their exhaust gases; tiierefore, their potential
for devdoping further reductions in the óxidtó of nitrogen is Umited today. For more
recent designs, reductions varipitsly estimated at between 5^10% may be possible
without tiie use of emission abatenient devices. For these existing engines, greater
reductions, pos^bly up to 30%, may be achievable, but only by the use of additional
equipment or through substantial modification. It is, however, potentially dangerous
tp arbitrarily ihtrodiice N O . abatemäit tedmiques on these older engines. For
ecample, water based em;ülsion aiid injection techiiiques or> altemativdy, the ùse of
delayed injection tinting can, if extended too far, lead to unreUabiUty and difficulties
in starting, with consequent safety impUcations.
^M.-.-. 11
In genaal terms a reduction in N O . by means of primary abatement measures is
likdy to lead to a detrimaital effect on specific f u d consumptipn. This in turn leads
to an increase in runniiig costs and to increased carbon dioxide production. Fiuther
r e s ^ r à i is requfred before definitive estimates can be made, however, based on
current information a reduction of the order of 10% in N O . would sfeem to imply a
one or two percent inaease ih specific f u d consumption.
In tenns of swndary methods, selective catalytic reduction techniques (SCR) are
showing considerable potential in their abiUty to e^ectivdy reduce.NO. emissions as
witnessed by the iheasüréments reported in [11]. In this work, reductions in N O . of
around 96% together with significant h y d r o c ^ ^ n emissicm reductions of the order
of 84 to 91% were reported for a 2300 tonne feny operating on gas oU. Cunentiy,
however, SCR uiüte have a sulphur-exhaust temperature window which confines
their operation to a region of low sülphüï- fuels, generaUy bdow 0.6 to 0.7%, and to
mecUimi and high speed aigines with exhaust temperatures in tiie range 290 to 500
d ^ C. Sigrüficant work is beihg undertaken to extend the siilphur tolarance of these
units to levds of 2% and above which, if successful, wiU enhance their tolerance to
thé Wider spectrum of marine fuds in coinmon use. AdditionaUy, the Ufe of the
catalyst elements discussed in [11] is iiidicating that operatmg liyes in excess of 20000
hours may be possible. If subject to wider vaUdation^ this coupled with a better
tolerance to sulphur in fuels is particularly encouraging for a more gaiierai acceptance
of tiie techrtique.
12
for a particular ship, however, in cases where a strict saüing schedule is required, a
vessd's speed requirement is largely a weather dominated parameter. This technic{ue
may in tum cUctate that less frdght capabiUty is avaUable or, altemativdy, that more
ships are required with a consequent detrimental effect on emissicms. Such a
solution, nevertheless, by taking into account the nominaUy ciibic relationship of
propulsicm power requirement with ship speed may, but not necessarily wiU, lead to
an overaU reduction m eriiissipns depending upon the ship speed and size, harbour
dzes and frdght capadty requiremente. AdditionaUy, a factor common to aÜ
operaticmal soluticms of this type, as opposed to machinery mcxiification, is the
degree to which they can be effectivdy rhonitored.
Other Pollutant Spedes
In adcliticm to N O . cónsiclërations, whidi as far as the air poUution debate is
concerned has largdy dominated discussion, other spedes heed recognition and
consideration. PrincipaUy, tiiese are the oxides of sulphur, cartxm dioxide, carbon
moncodcle, hydrocarlx^ns, particulates and microppUutants; this latter term being tiiat
gaieraUy used for those spedes present in trace quantities ahd typicaUy indude the
polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nitro-polyaromatic hydrocarlxms (n-PAHs),
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), jxilychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs) and
polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs). Of Üiése other pollutant spedes those of tiie
oxides of sulphur and carbori dioxide have perhaps recdved most consideration i n
terms of marine air
poUutioh-The oxides of sulphur (SO.) OTiginate directiy from the sulphur cpiitait of the fuel
used and in general terms the rnass sulphur input into the engine equals that output
in the exhaust, ^ a r t from a relativdy insigrüficant amount which is converted to
caldum sulphaite through the Use of alkaUhe lubricants. The prindpal SO. cOmpcmeht
is sulphur dioxide
(SO2),
with sulphur trioxide
(SÔ3)
forming to a much lesser extent
The most convenient way of reducdhg the SO. emissipns appears to l?e tiirough ttie
GQitirol of the sulphur content of ihe f u d since this, as far as the ship is concemed,
deals with the problem at source. Clearly, this is not tiie case with respect to the
r^nery. Fud sulphur limite can dther be applied on a gfobal or regicmal basis aind
curraitly the r ^ p n a l approach appears to be finding favour; typicaUy, in this
context a region inight form a geographical area such as the North Sea. VA^tiün these
regions the imposition of a comparatively stringent f u d siüphur linüt in marine terms
may be Ukdy to lead, for intanaticmal trädihg vessds, to an extension of the dual
f u d prindple. This in tum raises furtha* questions of marine safety iritroduced by
the absolute need to esnsure f u d ccnnpatibiUty and the wider consequences that can
rësult in the event of f u d rdated problaris arising. Therefore, coihddent with the
introduction of any regionaUy t>ased fuel restrictions the appropriate safety measures
need to be simultanepusly addressed. AdditionaUy, the sighificahoe of the siilphur
content inforinaticm which would need to be ccmtained on Bunker Receipt would
need careful attention by aU parties.
Global capping of f u d sulphur levels is a rhatter with far reaching poUtical and
techno-economic csOnseqUences. The sulphur content of tiie majcniiy of residual f u d
14
OÜS is found to vary between 1.5 and 4.0% worldwide whereas in North Western
Europe they are found to have values in the range 2.3 to 33% based cm LR's
é)q)erience As a consequence capping Urnits wül need to ccmsider these range of
sulphur content if they are to have any effect. As such the current ISO 8217
specification does not represent a real liniitation on currait fuds.
Carbon dioxide (COj) is a direct result of the fundamental combustion process and
iis a pirimary function of the c{uantity of f u d consumed. Ite ccmtrol, theréfore, has to
a very large extent to be implemented through the means of efficiency optimisation;
that is, by means of the fundamental prime mover effidaicy; the optimisaticm,
disposition and use of eh^r^ based auxiUary systems and the hydrcxlynamic
effidàicy of the ship. This, therefore, raises the concepte of system complexity, as
ccmsidered previously, and also the bounds of present knowledge and experience in
ship design. The situation with aiergy based auxiliary systems such as exhaust heat
recovery systenis, shaft drivai auxiliaries ahci so on is w d l known and the overaU
plant effidency and successful in-service operation are function of good design,
mahuÊscture and maintenance. Whilst significant progress in this area has been made
there is stül potential for further improvanent In order to appredably enhance
hydrodynamic propulsion effidency a fuller understanding of the thick boundary
laya- at the stem of the vessd is required. Until this is achieved only limited
improvements eah be made, nevertheless, sigrüficant energy savings have been
repctrted andi vaUdated by sea trials in certain instances of fitting some flow
augmentation aind recovery devices. For example, the fitting of a Grim vane whed
in the case of two frön ore caniers demcmstrated, on the basis of sea trials analysed
15
by LR, propulsive effidency improvanente in the region of 10 to 12%.
Notwithstanding a pleasing residt of this type, the potential for improvement is
always a unic]ue function of the incUvidual ship's propulsion paraimetas. Simikrly,
some flow control devices haVe yidded worthwhile résulte, however, as outUned
above Ûi&i dedgn currentiy depends, to a very large exterit> on empiricism.
In geheral terms it is, therefore, considered that the route towards CQz reduction is
to be found in the design optimisation óf Üie total ship unit and an integrated
transport infrastructure. In this respect both the minimisation of CC^ emissions and
the reduction of f u d coste Ue, in prindple, within the same objective.
Implementation Procedures
Ccmsideraticsi is cunaitly iTeing given to the definition pf different categories of
engine, based on power output> for tiie irnplementatipn of N O . regulations. These
prcKedures rdy on a mixtiue of type approval and survey procedures with the
unda'lying framework of ISO 8178 acting as the supporting procedure and they will
be contained wititin the MARPOL framework. This basis provides a way forward
which is consistent with the conventional maritime approach to inspecticm and, as
such, establishes for the ship operator a meahs of corhpliance with regulatory
procedures. These procedures recogrtise tiiat it is ultimatdy the flag state authorities
which wiU be responsible for the enforcement of €»diaust anission regulations but,
as in the case of tiie SOLAS ahd MARPOL réqUfrëmâite, the lACS affiliated
dassification spcieties are frequentiy bést placed to act as the approval ahd
16
verification agente in view of their independence and worldwide represaitation
which is synonymous with the intematiprial character of the marine industry.
In framing regulattons requiring the in-service assessment of exhaust emissions it
must be recognised that these can only be undertaken whai the vessd is at sea: this
is ih contrast, for exarhple, to the existing MARPOL requiremente whidi can l>e
implemented with the vessd in port. Where in-service trials are to be imdertaken for
regulatory compUanœ purposes it is probable that spedaUst personnd would be
recpiired to travd with the ship and this may involve extended pericxls at sea when
the vessd's trading pattem predudes short duration trips. Altemativdy^ if a
continuous mcmitoring approach were adopted this would, of necaisity, be under the
control of the vessd's Ghief Engineer who would be respcmsible for ensuring the
conect functioning, verificaticm, through pericxlic calibration, and maintenanœ of the
ecjuipment In this case the Chief Engineer's rejxsrte would be subject to scrutiny by
a ccmtrolUng authority, potentiaUy through the existing continupus survey schemes
operated by the major dassification scxieties.
It may be that a combination of two approaches is the most satisfactory option where
the bulk of the monitoring is done by a continuous approach with occasional
independent checks. However, in recognising tiie workload imposed by the pericxUc
exhaust emission inspection requirements, a balance must be drawn between the
rec{Uirèmente of the responsible authorities to check for possible non-compliance and
the dismption caused to the vessel's operatmg scheditie by such re(]uiremaite.
, 17
Conduding Rémarks
Frpm tiie foregping discussion a saies of coiKlusicms cóncerhing any proposed
exhaust emission régulaticms can be identified. These are as foUows;
i) A unified system of emisdon controls shpuld l7e introduced throu^out
the world wherever regulation is reqiured and the most appropriate
means to adiieve tiiis is through the Intematicmal Maritime
Organization.
U) It is unlikdy that a major short term reducticm on afr pollution from
marine sources wiU result from the intrcxiucticm of abatement measures
confined to new ships alone. This effect wiU, however, be cumulative
as fleet replacement over the years takes efiect
iii) Regulations should refiect the current or antidpated techitolo^cal
capabiUties at the time pf thefr mtrcxluction anci then be strengthened
and maintained 'in-line' with future research and devdopment for
newbuildings. Furthamore, they should be based on vaUdated service
pafprmance of the abatemait technologies.
iv) The levd of technology assodated with abatement techniques should be
comparable with that of the systems in which they aré installed.
18
v) There is cunentiy a diversity of opinion on the most appropriate form
for N O . limite.
vi) In-service N O . eniissfons are subject to ccmsiderable variations through
maintenance cydes, the mcxiifications carried out during the life of the
ship and from ambient ccmditions.
V Ü ) For new engines the achievement of a 30% reduction in currént levels
pf N O . ahissioris could be attainable. This is not, howeva-, the case for
existing engines where reductions variously estimated at between 5 anci
10% may be possible It is, however, potaitiaUy dangerous to
aifbitfarily introduce N O . abatëmait techniques on older engines.
viii) A reduction in N O . emissiprts of> for example, 10% would, based on
current informaticm, be generally expected to lead to a one or two
percent increase in specific f u d constm:iption.
ix) Sdective catalytic reducticm techniques have demcmstrated a potential
as a seconciary method of N Ô . and hydrocarbcm reduction for
applications within a window defined by low sulphur content and
exhaust tempa'a;tures betweai 290 and 500 deg C.
x) Sfow steaming may, but not necessarily wiU> lead to an overall
reduction in emiissiohs depending on the size of a vessel and ite sipeed.
freight requiremente and harbour avaüability.
xi) SO. emission reduction is most likely to be achieved through r ^ c m a l
restriction asscxiated with a global capping limit. This wiU rec^uire the
simultaneous addressing of appropriate saféty measures in ttiie case of
regional restrictions and attaition to the level set for ^obal capping if
it is to be effective.
X Ü ) CO^ reducticm depends cm the design optimisation pf the total ship uxtit
and an iritegrated transport mfrastmclure and, ther^re, is compatible
in prindple with economic considerations.
xiU) ImplemaitatiOn procedures are likdy to rdy oh a ccmibmation of type
approval and survey procedures and be based on the framework of ISO
8178.
xiv) ResponsibiUty for implementation wiÛ rest with the flag state as the
regulations wiU be set within the MARPOL requirements. However, by
vfrtue of tiidr independence and world wide representation,
classification societies are frequentiy best placed to act as approval and
verificaticm agente.
20
Acknowledgements
The Author wcmld like to thank the Committee of Lloyd's Register for permission to
publish the paper and also to his riiany coUeagues within LR upon whose work over
the yéars tiie sUbjed matter is based; particularly notable in tins respect are Dr G.L.
Reynokis and Mr A.A. Wright In adcUtion, thanks are also due to the various
members of the CIMAC Working Group on Exhaust Enüssion Controls and the
lOkŒS TCS Ccmuatittee where, through lively debate on these matters, many erf the
ideas have been formed and growh.
REFERENCES
1. Ruxton, T.> Ciu-lton, J.S. & Flameling, T. "A Simunary erf Scmne European
Marine Pollution Research". ICMES 93 Conf. Hamtnirg 1993.
Z Lloyd's Register, "Marine Exhaust Emission Research Programme: Phase II
Transient Emission Trials". Lloyd's Register, London, 1993.
3. Cariton, J.S., Wright, A.A. and Coker, R.J., "Marine Exhaust Emissicms - A
Regicmal Survey erf Emissions in the English Channd". Trans. LMar.E., March
1994.
4. Intanaticmal Maritime Organization, Intematicmal Conventicm for the
I^evention erf PoÛution from Ships,
M A R P O L
^ / 7 8 . International Maritime
Orgahizaticm, London, 1993.
5. Lloyd's Register, "Marine ETchaust Emission Research Programme: Phase n Afr
QuaUty Impact Evaluation". Lloyd's Register, London, 1993.
6. Intanational Shipping Federation "The World Wide Denumd and Supply erf
Seafarers". K F , BIMCO, 1991.
7. EUROMOT, "Thé Regulativem of Exhaust Emissions for Redprocating Intemal
Combustion Engines 91/01", Euromot 1991.
8. EUROMOT, "EUROMOT Proposal on Exhaust Emission Standards for Marine
Engines 93/01", Euromot 1993.
- 21
9. HacUa*, C , "Ffrst Conespondaiœ Papa- cm Tedmical Requiranente for New
Engines to Deal with NO.", IMO January 1993.
10. Bcxrf, Ph. " NO.-RedUctión of Diesel Engines by CcmcibUstion Afr Ccmditicming".
Paper D67. 20tii Iht O M A C Cong. London 1993.
11. Cooper, D. and Petarson, K. "Emission MàteUremaite from a Urea-based
SCR/cod Catalytic N O . / H C Exhaust Gas Treatment System on Board a Diesd
MTU Friedrichshafen
I T T t U
Deutsctie Aerospace
Measures for Reducing Noxious
Exhaust Emissions in High-speed,
High-performance Diesel Engines
Symposium "Motor 2000"
Amsterdam
November 1993
Dr.'Ing. Christoph Teetz
Measures for Reducing Noxious Exhaust Emissions
in High-speed, High-performance Diesel Engines
Symposium "Motor 2000"
Amsterdam
November igg3
Introduction
If one considers the material and energy iised during the manufacture and
oper-ation of a diesel ehgine, one will see that the diesel engine is a relatively
environmentally friendly machine over the length of its service l i f e , figore 1
• Environmentally safe materials such as cast iron, steel and aluminum a r é
machined (asbestos ahd cadmium are replaced).
• Conventional manufacturing procedures, environmental aspects can be
controlled;
• High proportion of recyclable materials;
• Long service l i f e ;
• High thermal efficiency.
Exhaust from Diesel Engines
The exhaust of internal-combustion engines contains components which are - or
may be dangerous to man and the environment. Legislators therefore define
-or are in the process of defining - different limits f-or the various
applica-tion areas; this process is not yet concluded but i s , rather, presently a very
dynamic one.
The components of the exhaust from a diesel engine must be evaluated,
figure 2:
molecules of Ng, Og and HgO are already present in the atmosphere and can be
considered non-harmful. CO2, also a natural part of the atmosphere, presents
a borderline c a s é : i t is not poisonous, however. It contributes to the
"green-house effect" as its c ö n c e n t r a t i o n in the atmosphere rises. CO, NOx» ^'^
and particulates (primarily carbon) are noxious.
The harmless compohents of diesel exhaust. Including COg, amount to 99.8% by
yolume, figure 3. It should be pointed out that a l l the noxious emissions
amount to only about 0.2% of the total volume. This very small portion of
individual components must be f ü r t h e r reduced. Of this 0.2%, the nitrous
oxides form the largest portion.
The affects of the individual noxious elements d i f f e r . To avoid injury to man
and prevent damage to t h é environment, such noxious elements should be
reduced, figure 4:
• Hydrocarbons form smog ahd can also cause cancer.
• Sulphur dioxide is essentially responsible for acid rain.
• Carbon monoxide is poisonous.
• Particulates - carbon soot - carry toxic agents anci can cause cancer.
• The nitrous oxides NO and Wz are toxic, form smog and participate In the
formation of acid rain.
There are primarily two mechanisms which create the noxious components in
die-sel exhaust, figure 5: CO, HC and particulates result from Ihcoiiqplete
combustion; SO2 and NOx caused by undesirable secondary reactions during
the thennal process.
Exhaust Legislation
Limits for diesel exhaust have been discussed for about 15 years.
For marine engines, legal limitations have been decided on recently for various
regions, figure 6. Switzerland's Federal Transport Institute (BAV) has
prepared legislation for marine engines with output power exceeding 100 kW
which will implemented for 1994.
The NOx liniit of 10 g/kWh planned for 1994 does not p r e s é n t an unsoivable
challenge for the development of diesel engines. This l i m i t w i l l also be
implemented for Lake Constance - located between Switzerland, Austria and
Germany - however, In 1993.
In California, limits will be implemented for 1995; the discussion is not yet
finished.
Exhaust limits are also being discussed for implementation i n 1996 for
inter-national waters. The target Is to reduce NOx emissions by 30% t i l l the year
2000.
For trucks, (figtire 7) frc>m 1995 on, the limits for the ÉCE 13-step test of
Euro II will have to be met: NOx ^1^^ have to be less than 7 g/kWh, CO less
than 4 g/kWh and HC will have to be under 1.1 g/kWh, and particulates will
have to be below 0.15 g/kWh.
It is to be expected that the exhaust-emission limits for the truck on the road,
diesel locomotives on r a i l s and vessels on inland waterways or near the coasts
w i l l be treated similarly, that i s , the limit figures will tend to approximate
one another as time passes.
The strictest limits at the moment are those of the german "TA-Luft" for
stationary diesel plants, figure 8. The limits were made originally for boiler
plants and are, therefore, referenced to the standard cubic meter o f exhaust
gas, contrary to other applications. The largest restriction taking effect
during the period between 1986 and 1994 will concern the NOx U m i t , a
reduction from 4 to 0,5 g/m^ standard a i r .
Even today, the permissible proportion of noxious components in the exhaust of a
diesel engine is considerably restricted.
The tendencies in exhaust-emission legislation can be summarized as follows,
figure 9:
a Further r é d u c t i o n of limits for noxious emissions are already subject to
limitation, that Is, NOx, ^h<i particulates,
• Introduction of limits for noxious emissions not presently restricted: SOg
and PAH (polycycUc aromatic hydrocarbons)^
• Reduetion of CO2 (greenhouse effect),
• Spreading of legislation to cover additional application groups,
• Introduction of International l i m i t s .
If the exhaust emissions from MTU diesels are compared with the TA-Luft limits
for stationary plants, i t can be seen that engines which have been "exhaust
optimized" already have emissions which are below the limits presently In
force, figure 10.
The path MTU followed to f u l f i l l the TA-Luft restrictions is explained in
figure 11. The basis is a Series 595 engine Which had been optimized for
consumption and performance, built for NTU's Class IDS application, that i s ,
for fast vessels. The NOx emissions represent 100% In the figure.
By altering
• the compression ratio,
• combustion-chamber geometry, and
• the injection system - particularly by delaying the start of injection,
the NOx emissions were reduced to 50% of the original value. The diagrams
show the consequences on cylinder pressure and heat release during the
combustion process. Specific fuel consumptioh suffered as a result.
Some features of the strategy which was worked out for this application can be
applied to other applications, such as ships.
The situation Is aggravated by the fact that the limits must not be exceeded
during the drive cycles required for applications like ship, locomotive and
trucks.
In order to f u l f i l l future emissiori limits, i t will be necessary to design a
diesel engine which provides favorable prerequisites for low noxioiis exhaust
emissions. In principle, measures within as well as outside the engine are
possible, figure 12.
With the engine-internal measures, the formation mechanisms in the combustion
chamber are influenced, that Is, the creation of the noxious component is
inhibited by:
• Influencing the gas flow In the crombustion chamber,
• Manipulating the injection parameters,
• Adapting the combustion-chamber geometry, and
• Altering the composition of the combustion a i r .
After treatment of the exhaust gas Is one of the engine-external measures;
noxious exhaust components already formed are reduced in a system downstream
of t h é engine. Because of the special problems relating to the emission of
NOx, particular attention i s given to the reduction of this noxious component
Ejnglne-Internal Measures
With the engine-internal measures, one must differentiate between the
Implementation of conventional and unconventional technologies. Among the
conventional technologies are those measures which have already been long
employed in the development of combustion methods and which have been
introduced into series engine production:
• Adaptation of the combustion chamber;
• Modification of the injection system;
• Adaptation of combustion-chamber swirl.
The influence of swirl on the emission o f NOx 1s shown in figure 13,
Combustion methods with high swirl, i . e . a high'tangential flow around the
axis of the cylinder, do not promote the reduction of NOx emission. If a
high-performance injection system is used. It is possible to reduce the
emission of NOx reducing the amount of swirl - without increasing
fuel consumption.
Under "unconventional" technologies we mean supplementary measures, some of
which involve considerable additional development effort as well as greater
expense in manufacture and operation of the engine for example:
• Water injection,
• Exhaust recirculation.
Figure 14 illustrates the effect of water injection.
Water is injected into the combustion chamber through a supplementary
injection system before combustion takes p l a c é . Vaporization of the water
lowers the temperature of the cylinder charge, and the resulting steam also
acts as an inert gas. NOx emission can be reduced by 40% without loss of
operating efficiency.
Water can also be injected into the combustion chamber through inlet a i r pipe
or with a fuel/water emulsion.
Testing in MTU's "pre-development" f a c i l i t i e s has shown that the three methods
are roughly equivalent in reducing NOx. emulsion has the additional
advantage that i t has a positive effect on the production of black smoke.
This method is s t i l l in the pre-development stage.
Trials with exhaust recirculation are presently being prepared at MTU,
figure 15. The figure shows data published by Ricardo. With a constant fuel
consumption, the NOx emissions can be reduced by 50%, however the production
of black smoke is a problem.
Engine-External Measures ^
In order to be able to f i i l f i l l the s t r i c t exhaust-emission limits which are
planned to be imposed by TA-Luft from 1994 onward for stationary plants,
diesels will have to have a exhaust aftertreatment system,
MTU is currently (figure 16) working on a project for the entire Daimler-Benz
concern. Its purpose is to optimize such a system; i t consists primarily of a
particulate f i l t e r , SCR catalytic converters and an oxidation catalytic
converter. Nitrous oxides are reduced with the aid of ammonia.
This method could also be employed with vessels where the weight and volume
of the propulsion plant are not of extreme importance. Good results have been
achieved with various types of catalytic converters, figure 17. Their behavior
d i f f e r s primarily as a function of the converter temperature. The greatest
conversion is reached with a catalytic converter made with elements of
solid-extruded catalytic material for which the conversion rate is over 95%.
The particulate f i l t e r Is biiilt of four chambers in which rod elements wound
with ceramic yarn are located, figure 18. Regeneration i s electro-thermal.
The particulate f i l t e r is not yet ready for series production because:
• regeneration has not beén solved satisfactorily, and
• with continued use, ash particles which carinot be regenerated are deposited
in the f i l t e r and cause excessively high exhaust back pressure.
Figure 19 shows the effectiveness of SCR technology and the particulate
f i l t e r . With SCR technology, the emission of NOx held below the limit of
500 mg per cubic meter of standard a i r . With the aid of the particulate
f i l t e r , a spot concentration below 20 mg per cubic meter of standard air can
be achieved; further development of the particulate f i l t e r i s , however,
necessary for the reasons stated above.
8
Concept for Combustion Developments
À concept for combustion development based on the legal parameters and
engineering potential has been worked out at MTU, figure 20:
• Operation without exhaust-emission limits
- Target
It is to be expected that differing exhaust emissions will be prescribed for
different applications and regions. For segments of the market, there will be
no limitation, even in the future. In such cases, the engines can be optimized
for fuel consumption.
For applications with unrestricted exhaust emissions, optimum fuel consumption
of <190 g/kWh will be achievable under acceptable exhaust figures.
- Measures
Consistent further development of the engines with regard to potential peak
(combustion) pressures, supercharging efficiency and combustion quality.
• Stationary applications
- Target
In stationary applications, TA-Luft imposes a limit of 500 mg/m^ standard air
for NOx ^''om 1994 onwareï.
Further restrictions are to be expected in Germany; it can already be assumed
that this strict limit will be introduced regionally but not worldwide
-diiring the next ten years.
- Measures
Operation below this figure can be achieved only by using exhaust gas
after-treatment; the engines will be optimized for fuel consumption.
• Ship, locomotive and truck application
- Target
I expect that the NOx limits for these applications will be set in the
area of 6 to 10 g/kWh and can be fulfilled by 1999 under consideration of
representative load profiles. After the year
2000,
the NOx Umit will lie
below 6 g/kWh.
- Measures
It is desirable that this limit be reached by engine-internal measures while
maintaining acceptable fuel consumption figures. If CO2 emission is taxed,
it may be advisable to meet this limit with engines optimized for fùel
consumption and Install a exhaust gas aftertreatment system. In this regard,
it should be mentioned that the addition of a exhaust gas aftertreatment
system considerably increases both the weight and the Installed volume of the
drive system. Especially in applications in which a customer requires small
overall dimensions and a high power-to-weight ratio, disadvantages result for
the diesel engine if exhaUst gas aftertreatinent is necessary.
Exhaust gas aftertreatment will be optimized on a test stand for complete
engines; the potential for engine-internal measures is determined on three
single-cylinder engine test stands. After the goals are reached with
pre-prototype engines, economical concepts for series engine production must
be developed.
10
Summary
• It is safe to assume that legislation for exhaust emissions Will be stricter
• The exhaust emissions of diesel engines can be further reduced by
engine-internal measures
• The diesel engirie can be adapted to stay within the expected limits for
mobile applications without exhaust gas aftertreatment
• Exhaustgas aftertreatment will be necessary for stationary plants in
the future
• A method suitable of filtering out particulates is not yet available for
series production
• The engine-internal measures for the reduction of exhaust emissions is
presently iri the pre-prototype stage.
co
O.
x:
M
CO
Q
C
0>
x:
0)
O
•O
0>
1
•c
s 2
^ s
« 9
I» fa
© •§
s
« H
^ O
O S
ë
0
fa
tt
0
03
1
I
S
's
a
O
1
I
•a
8
CQI
1-^
'S
I
GQ
I
I
•J3I
| : l
'S
I
ra
CL
B
c
'üi
c
111
C)
(O
O
Û
(O
E
p
c
O
w
(O
co
c
0)
c
O
a
E
O
O
(0
UJ
3
(O
£
K
Ul
^ ^ ^ ^i
m
3
CMC
O)
>^
O
c
O
- Ü
(D
CO
O
c
co
«
l
i
c
O
n
CL
B
=3(0
ta
o
0)
h-e
'5)
c
UJ
fl)0)
Q)
Û
(Q
E
g
0)
(0
«
• H
E
UJ
t o
3
£
X
Ul
Il II II E O >C
3
ir
3
O
(O
c
Ul
(O
O
E
2
M
co
co
E
Ul
UJ
CO
c
s
6
E
(O
. 3O ü
D O
E
Co • »
^ w
•c O
Ë"l
O, O)
. £ 3O a
S
O)
O
£ E
ca co
i "
co
c
E
CD
E
cö
O
O
DE
co
ü
03
I
LT
O
T3
O
O)
c
0) ü
O. 03
C
O
1
a
co
co
•
Q
•2
g
co
c
X
O
co
co
O
O
«
co
ü
s «
ü 5
c
O
+^
O
c
3co
c
O
M
^ O
ü
g co
co 0
ë l
•5 H
x i
^ D l • ^ • ^S S
O- §
O jQ
H co
£ 2
> ö
^ s Q.
i | s
i l l
i g 8
H. O ffl
^ P co
£ — c
O) co JO
c p ^
E c
co O <i>
0
is
c
c c p
0 co O
|2 i :s
ü
O CMco
Oü
ü
CM Oco
CO
£
P
fl)S
CO
c
O
S
"O
X
0)
O
"D
3x:
Q.
3CO
CD
X
O
c
O
E
c
O
co
ü
O
O
co
0
' x
O
c
O
E
c
O)
O
0
X
O
c
0
a>
O
3
s
ai
a.
i
s
C
•S
CB
CO
O
• Ö
0>
N
co
o
co
3
co
fl)UJ
fl)co
fl)s
E
co
e
o
• M
CO
co
co
3
CB
I
CO
3
O
K
O
I
"5
ÇB
3CO
"5
C
O
l " §
' x
0 , E
O
O
o
3
jQ
E
o
o
I
a
E
o
o
c
Ü o
0
i*.Ü O
CO O
o
-2
J3
Q
c
o
•§
s o
S ico o
£ 30
2
B
i
.2 S
Q
C
O
0
E
0
^ 1
CO co ^ O) o
o o c
0 ^
co
B
co
o ^
CO
II.w
5
co
»tr(D ë
€ . 9 ? " SI
- S0
Q,
O >?? 0
•S
w " 9 <D
• 5
« S a
o
tt)£ o
3 i ^ - B : ^
ra C
•jn
B
3It
£ O
ç "O (0
= 2
^ 0)
= C0
I
I
O)
0II
S S
£ O
SO)
9 O)
co
%^
O
co
É
c
0)
-D
O
O
co
m
O
O
1
co
«
4)
c
c
"5
m
O
•O
0)
09co
(O
>
E
w
(0
E
E
O
O
co CD c ' 5Q.
é>
O) ç 3 "O •DE
V . Q) <D Oco
c
co
iS
E
UJ
§ I
ô O O O OO O Ü ü
Z Ü X X
l
l
l
l
O)Oi
co
cn Oi
a>
O)
C3>a>
co
XO
IS.O) O)
<3ï a>O) O)
Ü d )co
co
co
c
E
C7 (D09
B
(fi
c
O
O fl)co
3
(B
J E
Ul
12 «
.t: JS
E «
Z.2
t) «
ï i
0> CsJi
X O c Ö3 c-3 CO c O cö co - 5E
to coX3
E
0.
in
O) 2 c O c co : Ë ü35
w co (O 0)>
O) Vg
^ co-7 O
§ sa
s co O) © V £ •7 OS2 ^ 1
£ O CM « GI B
Oc:
O co _ ^ 3 CD T ï CO O) O)£ ^ € 2
t r
X5
S
jQ
— I Ira C