Key words: green roofs, biodiversity, green infrastructure, social function, nature protection
Introduction
*UHHQ URRIV KDYH EHFRPH
a standard in modern design practice of intensive urban developments. In Poland, such green installations are most often used in developer hous- ing estates in order to create micro- interiors and courtyards atop car park ceilings. It has been noted that green roofs show potential in marketing and aesthetic terms, and, to a limited ex- tent, recreational dimension, whereas the pro-environmental and pro-social impact of such installations, espe- cially in case of highly urbanized ar- eas is often underestimated. It seems that, despite the substantial amount of literature on the subject, green roofs are still an underestimated element of green infrastructure in Polish cities.
Moreover, despite the criticism the installations receive on the ground of the limitations concerning the substrate layers, whose composition LV IDU IURP QDWXUDO VXEVWUDWHV >'XQ- QHWW1RODQ@LWVKRXOGEHQRWHG
that green roofs can function in the metropolitan structure of the city, thereby becoming a valuable link in WKH&LW\qV1DWXUDO6\VWHP
Materials and methods
The article provides a compara- tive analysis of 3 selected case studies
of green roofs, namely gardens on the roof of Sargfabrik in Vienna (1996), green roof atop the historic building LQ´NRZHUNLQ%HUOLQDVZHOO
DV WKH rZLOGs JDUGHQ RQWKH URRI
of the Primary School in Sheffield 7KH FKRLFH ZDV PDGH DF- cording to such criteria as the surface criterion, the functional criterion and the presence of connections between the selected green roofs and green objects in their surroundings (Ta- ble 1). The projects indicated in the following study have been selected as representative examples of the group of the analysed multifunctional solutions that integrate greenery with buildings.
Garden as an element of social and natural bonds
Sargfabrik in Vienna (1996) is an interesting example of a garden built on the roof, inspired by social conditions and a bottom-up initiative (Fig. 1). Vienna, being a metropolis of social housing estates, can pride itself on an example of a self-governing housing project carried out by the non-profit Association for the Integra- WLYH /LIHVW\OH 9HUHLQ IÚU ,QWHJUDWLYH
Lebensgestaltung-VIL) under the VORJDQ RI r)ODW&XOWXUH,QWHJUDWLRQs
In 1996, a building was completed and settled which, apart from flats, is equipped with places such as VHPLQDU URRPV DFDIÇ DFRQFHUW
G re en R o o fs a s a n E le m en t o f t he F un ct io na l a nd S p a tia l S tru ct ur e o f a M et ro p o lis K in ga Z in o w ie c-C ie p lik
Zielone dachy jako element struktury funkcjonalno- -przestrzennej metropolii
DOI: 10.30825/5.ak.175.2019.64.3
Forum
6áRZDNOXF]RZH zielone GDFK\ELRUyĪQRURGQRĞü]LHORQD
LQIUDVWUXNWXUDVSRáHF]QHIXQNFMH
ochrona przyrody
Wprowadzenie
=LHORQH GDFK\ VWDä\ VLö VWDQ- GDUGHP ZH ZVSÑäF]HVQHM SUDNW\FH
projektowej intensywnej zabudowy.
:3ROVFH QDMF]öĈFLHM Z\NRU]\VW\- ZDQH VñZGHZHORSHUVNLFK RVLH- dlach mieszkaniowych do kreacji PLNURZQöWU]LSRGZÑUHNQDVWURSDFK
SDUNLQJRZ\FK 'RVWU]HJD VLö LFK
SRWHQFMDä PDUNHWLQJRZ\ HVWHW\F]- ny oraz w ograniczonym zakresie UHNUHDF\MQ\QDWRPLDVWF]öVWREDJD- WHOL]RZDQH Vñ]QDF]HQLD SURĈURGR- ZLVNRZHLSURVSRäHF]QH]ZäDV]F]D
w silnie zurbanizowanych obsza- UDFK :\GDMH VLö ĔHPLPR ERJDWHM
literatury przedmiotu zielone dachy VWDOH VñQLHGRFHQLDQ\P HOHPHQWHP
zielonej infrastruktury w polskich PLDVWDFK0LPRNU\W\NL]HZ]JOöGX
na ograniczenia warstw substra- WRZ\FK NWÑU\FK VNäDG GDOHNL MHVW
RGQDWXUDOQ\FK SRGäRĔ\ >'XQQHWW
1RODQ@QDOHĔ\]ZUÑFLèXZDJö
ĔHPRJñRQHIXQNFMRQRZDèZVWUXN- WXU]HSU]HVWU]HQQHMPHWURSROLLVWDMñF
VLöZDĔQ\PRJQLZHPV\WHPXSU]\- rodniczego miasta.
Materia³ i metody
W artykule zaprezentowano LSRGGDQR DQDOL]LH SRUÑZQDZF]HM
VWXGLD SU]\SDGNÑZ Z\EUDQ\FK
]LHORQ\FKGDFKÑZRJURG\QDGDFKX
Sargfabrik w Wiedniu (1996), zielo- ny dach na zabytkowym obiekcie Z´NRZHUN Z%HUOLQLH RUD]
eG]LNLsRJUÑGQDGDFKXV]NRä\SRG- VWDZRZHMZ6KHIILHOG:\ERUX
GRNRQDQR NLHUXMñF VLö NU\WHULXP
powierzchniowym, funkcjonalnym RUD] Z\VWöSRZDQLHP SRZLñ]Dþ
SRV]F]HJÑOQ\FK ]LHORQ\FK GDFKÑZ
]RWDF]DMñF\PL RELHNWDPL ]LHOHQL
(tab. 1). Realizacje te wskazano jako UHSUH]HQWDW\ZQH SU]\NäDG\ ]JUXS\
DQDOL]RZDQ\FK UR]ZLñ]Dþ ZLHOR- IXQNF\MQ\FK LQWHJUXMñF\FK ]LHOHþ
z budynkami.
Ogród jako element wiêzi spo³ecznej i przyrodniczej
Sargfabrik w Wiedniu (1996) MHVW FLHNDZ\P SU]\NäDGHP RJURGX
]DäRĔRQHJRQDGDFKXXSRGVWDZNWÑ- UHJROHĔñXZDUXQNRZDQLDVSRäHF]QH
7DEOH6XPPDU\RIWKHDQDO\]HGJUHHQURRIV0DUNVGRPLQDQWIXQFWLRQRFFXUULQJIXQFWLRQVLGHIXQFWLRQuQRIXQFWLRQDYDLODEOH 7DEHOD=HVWDZLHQLHDQDOL]RZDQ\FK]LHORQ\FKGDFKÑZ2]QDF]HQLDGRPLQXMñFDIXQNFMDZ\VWöSXMñFDIXQNFMDSRERF]QDIXQNFMDuEUDN
GDQHMIXQNFML
Object Obiekt
Year of construction Rok budowy
Surface
<N2] Pow.
<N2]
Social function
'VOLDKB społeczna
Recreational function
'VOLDKB rekreacyjna
Educational function
'VOLDKB edukacyjna
'VODUJPOPG
JNQSPWJOH
CJPEJWFSTJUZ 'VOLDKB
X[NBDOJBOJB
CJPSØȈOPSPEOPǴǎ
1SPYJNJUZPG
greenery
#MJTLB [JFMFǩ
Sargfabrik Vienna
8JFEFǩ 1996 1000 +++ +++ ++ ++ .BU[OFS-Park
Okowerk
#FSMJO 2005 800 + _ +++ +++ (SVOFWBME
Sharrow
Sheffield 2006 2000 ++ + +++ +++ .POU1MFBTBOU
Park
hall, a children integration room, a playground, a swimming pool/
baths, backyard-meeting squares planted with vegetation and allowing for rainwater retention, as well as fit- ted with a roof garden. This garden, due to its form, has been divided into several parts. These include a meet- ing place (garden terrace), a decora- tive garden comprising plants of dry HQYLURQPHQWVuHQFODYHVRIGLYHUVLW\
and plant spontaneity, and a utility garden that is highly popular. The green roof is maintained and grown independently by the inhabitants of the building, who, in return for their work, receive an additional 1000 m2 of recreational, integration and
garden space in one place, while small vegetable garden beds and micro orchard provide them with the joy of growing their own crops.
While working in the garden, families with children are involved, whereas an educational program conducted as part of the activity of an integra- tion room also pays attention to the important role that is played by the contact of the youngest and the na- ture. The garden undergoes constant changes, beehives are set up and new seedlings are planted every year.
Users may settle the garden with spontaneous vegetation, and, finally, the garden is hospitable to birds and insects (including pollinators) which,
in the light of contemporary research, is a very important aspect of creating a resilient living environment. It is up to the residents to decide on the types of plants and forms to be planted in the garden. As it stems from the pro- ject, in its assumptions dating back to turn of the 80s and 90s that led to the implementation of Sargfabrik, WKH$VVRFLDWLRQ9HUHLQIÚU,QWHJUDWLYH
Lebensgestaltung was innovative and went ahead of its time by almost 20 years in terms of the ideas for creat- ing urban farms. Such farms may be understood not only as places to support the production of fruit and vegetables in the city, but, above all, as places marked with the potential to strengthen bonds between neigh- bours. Combining the biologically active areas of Sargfabrik with green areas of the city enables the develop- ment of ecosystem dependencies and improvement of the quality of the living environment.
The garden atop the roof of has become a place that fosters the flow of emotions and empathy among the inhabitants, as well as the circulation of matter and energy of the Vienna Nature System. The connections with the City Natural System were facilitated by the small Matzner-Park located nearby, the neighbouring extensive green roofs, the tree lined Linzer street, and the surrounding green areas in the interi- ors of the block developments. Apart from its original purpose, the roof garden of Sargfabrik that came into being as a result of the need to build )LJ8UEDQIDUPRQURRIWRSRIWKH6DUJIDEULNGZDUIIUXLWWUHHVDUHQRWLFHDEOHLQWKHEDFNJURXQG
SKRWRE\.=LQRZLHF&LHSOLN
5\F2JUÑGXĔ\WNRZ\QDGDFKX6DUJIDEULNZJäöELZLGDèNDUäRZHGU]HZNDRZRFRZH
IRW.=LQRZLHF&LHSOLN
oraz oddolna inicjatywa (ryc. 1).
:LHGHþ PHWURSROLD VRFMDOQHJR
EXGRZQLFWZD PRĔH SRFKZDOLè VLö
SU]\NäDGHPVDPRU]ñGQHMLQZHVW\FML
mieszkaniowej przeprowadzonej SRG KDVäHP e0LHV]NDQLH u .XOWXUD
u ,QWHJUDFMDs SU]H] 6WRZDU]\V]HQLH
(non profit) na rzecz Integracyjnego 6W\OX ē\FLD 9HUHLQ IÚU ,QWHJUDWLYH
/HEHQVJHVWDOWXQJ u 9,/ :
URNX XNRþF]RQR L]DVLHGORQR EX- G\QHN Z\SRVDĔRQ\ RERN PLHV]NDþ
ZVDOH VHPLQDU\MQH NDZLDUQLö VDOö
ZLGRZLVNRZñ VDOö LQWHJUDFML G]LH- FLöFHM SODF ]DEDZ EDVHQäDĒQLö
SRGZÑU]D u eVNZHU\s VSRWNDþ RE- VDG]RQH URĈOLQQRĈFLñ LSR]ZDODMñFH
QDUHWHQFMö ZRG\ GHV]F]RZHM RUD]
RJUÑGQDGDFKX2JUÑGWHQSRG]LHOR- QR]UDFMLMHJRIRUP\QDNLONDF]öĈFL
PLHMVFH VSRWNDþ WDUDV RJURGRZ\
RJUÑG R]GREQ\ URĈOLQ ĈURGRZLVN
VXFK\FK u HQNODZ\ UÑĔQRURGQRĈFL
LVSRQWDQLF]QRĈFL URĈOLQQHM RUD]
RJUÑG XĔ\WNRZ\ NWÑU\ FLHV]\ VLö
EDUG]R GXĔ\P ]DLQWHUHVRZDQLHP
=LHORQ\GDFKPLHV]NDþF\XWU]\PXMñ
LXSUDZLDMñVDPRG]LHOQLH:]DPLDQ
RWU]\PXMñGRGDWNRZHP2 prze- strzeni rekreacyjnej, integracyjnej i ogrodowej w jednym, a niewielkie JU]ñGNL ZDU]\ZQLND RUD] PLNURVDG
SU]\QRV]ñ VDW\VIDNFMö ]ZäDVQ\FK
SORQÑZ:SUDFöZRJURG]LH]DDQ- JDĔRZDQHVñURG]LQ\]G]LHèPL]DĈ
program edukacyjny prowadzony w sali integracyjnej ma na uwadze LVWRWQñ UROö NRQWDNWX QDMPäRGV]\FK
]QDWXUñ 2JUÑG VWDOH VLö ]PLHQLD
SRMDZLDMñ VLö XOH LFRURNX Z\NR- Q\ZDQH VñQRZH UR]VDG\ ,VWQLHMH
przyzwolenie na zasiedlanie ogrodu URĈOLQQRĈFLñVSRQWDQLF]QñQDJRĈFL- QöSWDNÑZLRZDGÑZPLQ]DS\OD- F]\ FRZĈZLHWOH ZVSÑäF]HVQ\FK
EDGDþMHVWEDUG]RZDĔQ\PDVSHNWHP
NUHRZDQLDRGSRUQHJRĈURGRZLVNDĔ\- FLD0LHV]NDþF\GHF\GXMñRURĈOLQDFK
i formach uprawy ogrodu. Okazuje VLöĔHVWRZDU]\V]HQLH9HUHLQIÚU,Q- tegrative Lebensgestaltung w swoich ]DäRĔHQLDFK]SU]HäRPXODWL
NWÑUH GRSURZDG]Lä\ GRUHDOL]DFML
6DUJIDEULN E\äR QRZDWRUVNLH LZ\- SU]HG]LäR REOLVNR ODW LGHH IDUP
miejskich rozumianych nie tylko jako miejsce wsparcia produkcji warzyw LRZRFÑZ ZPLHĈFLH DOH SU]HGH
ZV]\VWNLP MDNR SRWHQFMDä Z]PDF- QLDQLDZLö]LVñVLHG]NLFK3RZLñ]DQLH
powierzchni biologicznie czynnych Sargfabrik z terenami zieleni w mie- ĈFLHXPRĔOLZLDMñUR]ZÑM]DOHĔQRĈFL
HNRV\VWHPRZ\FK L SRSUDZö MDNRĈFL
ĈURGRZLVND]DPLHV]NDQLD
2JUÑG QDGDFKX 6DUJIDEULN
VWDäVLöPLHMVFHPSU]HSä\ZXHPRFML
LHPSDWLLPLHV]NDþFÑZRUD]PDWHULL
i energii Systemu Przyrodniczego :LHGQLD3RZLñ]DQLD]630XäDWZL- ä\ SREOLVNL QLHZLHONL 0DW]QHU3DUN
VñVLDGXMñFH HNVWHQV\ZQH ]LHORQH
dachy, zadrzewiona ulica Linzer, RNROLF]QD ]LHOHþ ZQöWU] ]DEXGRZ\
NZDUWDäRZHM2JUÑGGDFKRZ\6DUJ- IDEULN SRZVWDä ]SRWU]HE\ EXGRZD- QLD ZLö]L VSRäHF]QHM DOH UÑZQROH- gle, niezamierzenie w odniesieniu GRSLHUZRWQHM LGHL RVLñJQñä ZDĔQ\
FHOuX]XSHäQLä603VWDMñFVLöHQNOD- ZñLSRPRVWHPGODPLHMVNLHMQDWXU\
Zielony dach jako eksperyment bioró¿norodnoœci
,QWHUHVXMñF\PSU]\NäDGHP]LH- ORQHJRGDFKXNWÑUHJRSRGVWDZRZ\P
zadaniem jest funkcja badawcza GRW\F]ñFDHNRORJLF]QHJRSRWHQFMDäX
tego rodzaju instalacji, jest enklawa zieleni na zabytkowym budynku VWDFML ZRGRFLñJRZHM ],, SRäRZ\
;,; Z´NRZHUN Z%HUOLQLH U\F
=LHORQ\ GDFK SRZVWDZDä WXWDM VD- PRF]\QQLH ZFLñJX RVWDWQLFK
lat (budynek wybudowano w latach
uQDZ\V\SDQ\PSLDVNLHP
SäDVNLP ELWXPLF]Q\P VWURSLH NWÑU\
Z\PDJDä JUXQWRZQHM SU]HEXGRZ\
NRQVWUXNF\MQHMQDSRF]ñWNX;;,ZLH- NX u 3RNU\W\ ]F]DVHP
]LHOHQLñGDFKSRF]ñWNRZRE\äXWU]\- P\ZDQ\]HZ]JOöGXQDMHJRIXQNFMH
SU]HFLZSRĔDURZH'RSLHURSRRWZR- rzeniu w tym miejscu w 1985 r.
&HQWUXP 2FKURQ\ 3U]\URG\ QDEUDä
znaczenia ekologicznego. W trakcie SU]HEXGRZ\ GDFKX u ZDUVWZDURĈOLQQD]RVWDäD]GMöWDLE\äD
uprawiana do momentu ponownej implementacji. Po renowacji stropu ]LHORQ\GDFKVWDäVLöZDĔQ\PRELHN- tem badawczym i edukacyjnym 1DWXUVFKXW]]HQWUXP´NRZHUN%HUOLQ
e.V. (Centrum Ochrony Przyrody), NWÑUHG]LDäD ZGDZQHM VWDFML ZRGR- FLñJRZHM :DVVHUZHUN 7HXIHOVVHH
1DGDFKX URVQñ SRURVW\ PFK\
rojniki i rozchodniki. Spontanicznie SRMDZLDMñ VLö QRZH JDWXQNL URĈOLQ
a social bond, will, at the same time, achieve a vital goal in relation to the original idea, namely it will actively supplement the City Natural System by becoming an enclave and a bridge for urban nature.
Green roofs as an experiment in the field of biodiversity
One of the particularly interest- ing examples of a green roof whose basic task is the research function in regard to the ecological potential of this type of installation is a greenery enclave atop the historic water sta- WLRQEXLOGLQJLQ´NRZHUNLQ%HUOLQ
which dates back to the second half of the 19th century (Fig. 2). The green roof emerged there spontaneously
over the last 100 years (the building ZDVFRPSOHWHGLQRQDIODW
sand-covered, bitumen ceiling, which required a thorough structural recon- struction at the beginning of the 21st century (2005/2006). Over time, the roof was covered by greenery, which was initially maintained due to its fire prevention functions.
It was only after The Centre for Nature Conservation had been opened in this place in 1985 that the roof has gained in ecological signifi- cance. During the reconstruction of WKHURRIuWKHSODQWOD\HU
was removed and cultivated until it could finally be re-implemented.
After the renovation of the ceiling had been completed, the green roof became an important research and educational object for Naturschutz- ]HQWUXP´NRZHUN%HUOLQH91DWXUH
Conservation Centre). The Centre
operates in the former Wasserwerk Teufelssee water station. The plants growing on the roof include lichens, mosses, sempervivum, and sedum.
New species of plants appear spon- taneously, and observations also focus on insects. As the research VKRZV >.VLD]HN @ PRUH WKDQ
VSHFLHV H[LVW RQWKH ´NRZHUN
roof, including one species of fern, nine species of grasses, fifty species of herbaceous plants, four species of mosses and lichens, seven species of tree seedlings (too large ones are removed) and multiple species of insects, such as eleven species of spi- ders, fifteen species of beetles, twenty five species of bees, five species of wasps, as well as one species of ants
>.VLD]HN@
Therefore, green roofs prove im- portant in terms of pollinator habitat protection, which, in the context of a sharp decline in their population
>7RQLHWWRD@VHHPVWRSOD\DYL- tal role in the fight for their preserva- tion. Due to the essential research and protective functions, the access to the greenery on the Wasserwerk Teufelssee ceiling is not universally granted to participants of the Nature Conservation Centre workshops. The roof is too small to withstand the pres- sure of being applied to recreational use, and besides, such application was not its original purpose. In addi- tion to its research and conservation functions, it is a part of the educa- tional program and serves the pur- pose of clearly identifying the Nature Conservation Centre.
)LJ%LRGLYHUVLW\RQ´NRZHUNURRIWRSSKRWRE\.=LQRZLHF&LHSOLN 5\F5ÑĔQRURGQRĈèELRORJLF]QDQDGDFKX´NRZHUNIRW.=LQRZLHF&LHSOLN
REVHUZDFMH NRQFHQWUXMñ VLö WDNĔH
QDRZDGDFK %DGDQLD SRND]XMñ
>.VLD]HN @ ĔHQDGDFKX ´NR- ZHUN E\WXMH SRQDG JDWXQNÑZ
w tym m.in. 1 gatunek paproci,
JDWXQNÑZWUDZJDWXQNÑZ]LR- äRURĈOLJDWXQNLPFKÑZLSRURVWÑZ
JDWXQNÑZVLHZHNGU]HZ]E\WGXĔH
VñXVXZDQH RUD] VSRUR RZDGÑZ
JDWXQNÑZ SDMöF]DNÑZ JD- WXQNÑZ FKU]ñV]F]\ JDWXQNÑZ
SV]F]RäRZDW\FK JDWXQNÑZ RVR- ZDW\FK DWDNĔH JDWXQHN PUÑZNL
>.VLD]HN@
=LHORQ\ GDFK RND]XMH VLö E\è
ZDĔQ\ SRG Z]JOöGHP RFKURQ\
siedlisk zapylaczy, co w kontek- ĈFLH JZDäWRZQHJR REQLĔDQLD VLö
LFK SRSXODFML >7RQLHWWRD @ PD
znaczenie w walce o ich zachowa- nie. Z racji zasadniczych funkcji EDGDZF]\FK LRFKURQQ\FK ]LHOHþ
na stropie Wasserwerk Teufelssee QLH MHVW SRZV]HFKQLH GRVWöSQD GOD
XF]HVWQLNÑZ ZDUV]WDWÑZ &HQWUXP
Ochrony Przyrody. Dach jest zbyt PDä\DE\PÑJäSU]HWUZDèQDVWöSVWZD
MHJRXĔ\WNRZDQLDUHNUHDF\MQHJRLQLH
WDNLHE\äRSLHUZRWQHMHJR]DäRĔHQLH
Obok roli badawczej, ochronnej, jest elementem programu edukacyjnego oraz jednoznacznie identyfikuje Cen- trum Ochrony Przyrody.
3U]\NäDG ´NRZHUNX SRND]XMH
MDNQDWXUDWZRU]\ZUD]]XSä\ZHP
F]DVX HOHPHQW HNRV\VWHPX *UXQH- ZDOG LV]HU]HM u EHUOLþVNLHM PHWUR- polii.
Dach szkolny pod ochron¹
2ND]XMHVLöĔHZVWRVXQNRZR
NUÑWNLP F]DVLH ]LHORQ\ GDFK PRĔH
RND]Dè VLö ERJDW\P HNRV\VWHPHP
ZDUW\PREMöFLDJRRFKURQñSUDZQñ
7DNVWDäRVLöZSU]\SDGNXHNRORJLF]- QHM NRPSR]\FML QDVWURSLH V]NRä\
Sharrow w Sheffield w Wielkiej Brytanii. Podczas projektu nowego EXG\QNX SRZVWDäD LGHD ]DäRĔHQLD
na jego stropie zielonego dachu SU]\MD]QHJR URĈOLQRP WZRU]ñF\P
]UÑĔQLFRZDQH VLHGOLVND :HGäXJ
projektanta Nigela Dunnetta ce- OHP ]DäRĔHQLD E\äR eVWZRU]HQLH
QDVDG]Hþ ZDĔQ\FK ZL]XDOQLH LHV- WHW\F]QLH SU]H] ZLöNV]RĈè URNX
RUD]]DSHZQLHQLHELRUÑĔQRURGQRĈFL
ogrodu o minimalnych wymaganiach GRW\F]ñF\FK ]DVREÑZ LNRQVHUZD- FMLs WäXP DXW >6KDUURZ 3ULPDU\
6FKRROf@ e']LNLs RJUÑG ]DäRĔRQR
Z U SRVDG]RQR EOLVNR
URĈOLQZ\VLDQRMHGQRURF]QHURĈOLQQ\
äñNRZHNWÑUH]DF]öä\VLöVDPHUR]- VLHZDè=DSODQRZDQRZSURZDG]HQLH
URG]LP\FKJDWXQNÑZRUD]VWDUDQRVLö
VWZRU]\èZDUXQNLGRVSRQWDQLF]QHJR
SRMDZLDQLD VLö RNROLF]Q\FK URĈOLQ
zielnych. Zaprojektowana kompo- ]\FMDQLH]DZLHUDäDWUDZ]HZ]JOöGX
na ich ekspansywny charakter. Nie W\ONR URĈOLQ\ E\ä\ FHOHP SRZVWDQLD
WHJR ]LHORQHJR GDFKX 2JUÑG WDN
]UÑĔQLFRZDQR VLHGOLVNRZR DE\ E\ä
SU]\MD]Q\ GOD EH]NUöJRZFÑZ RUD]
SWDNÑZ >6KDUURZ 6FKRRO u *UHHQ
(VWDWH/DQGVFDSHf@ 2VWDWHF]QLH
XNV]WDäWRZDäRVLöNLONDVLHGOLVNZW\P
PLQNRPSR]\FMHäñNRZHZDSLHQQH
PXUDZ\ NVHURWHUPLF]QH ĈURGRZL- sko wilgotne stawu, spontaniczne siedlisko ruderalne, oraz pionierskie JUXS\VDPRVLHZÑZGU]HZuZRJUD- QLF]RQHMIRUPLH'DFKREMöW\]RVWDä
VSHFMDOLVW\F]Q\PL ]DELHJDPL SLHOö- gnacyjnymi prowadzonymi przez GRĈZLDGF]RQ\FKRJURGQLNÑZLDUFKL- WHNWÑZ NUDMREUD]X ]DSHZQLDMñF\PL
oczekiwane efekty estetyczne, jak i ochronne. Regularnie usuwane VñQLHSRĔñGDQH LHNVSDQV\ZQH UR- ĈOLQ\ RGPäDG]DQH VñVLHZNL GU]HZ
SRRVLñJQLöFLXZ\VPDZREV]D- rach nieprzeznaczonych pod drzewa LNU]HZ\ XVXZDQH VñPäRGH URĈOLQ\
L RF]\V]F]DQHRSDVNL ĔZLURZH DE\
QLH GRSXĈFLè GR]DZLOJRFHQLD NRQ- VWUXNFML 3UDFH SLHOöJQDF\MQH VñUD- SRUWRZDQHRSLVXMHVLöSRGMöWH]DGD- QLDMDNUÑZQLHĔ]PLDQ\ZSRNU\FLX
URĈOLQQ\PRUD]ZDĔQHJDWXQNLIORU\
LIDXQ\&DäRĈèX]XSHäQLDGRNXPHQ- WDFMDIRWRJUDILF]QD3RGZÑFKODWDFK
RG]DäRĔHQLD]DREVHUZRZDQRZ]URVW
UÑĔQRURGQRĈFL JDWXQNRZHM 1DGD- chu zidentyfikowano spontaniczne SRMDZLHQLH VLö PLQ NUZDZQLND
pospolitego ($FKLOOHD PLOOHIROLXP), MDVWUXQDZäDĈFLZHJR/HXFDQWKHPXP
YXOJDUH),bylicy pospolitej ($UHPLVLD
YXOJDULV), straca jakubka (-DFREDHD
YXOJDULV), dziewanny drobnokwito- wej (9HUEDVFXPWKDSVXV), ostrogowca czerwonego (&HQWUDQWKXV UXEHU), lnicy purpurowej (/LQDULDSXUSXUHD) RUD] JDWXQNÑZ RVWÑZ &LUVLXP sp.
u RVWURĔQL DVWUÑZ $VWHU sp.), pod- ELDäX 7XVVLODJR sp.), brodawnika
´NRZHUNqV H[DPSOH VKRZV
how, over time, nature creates the HOHPHQWRIERWKWKH*UXQHZDOGDQG
in the broader sense, the metropolis of Berlin ecosystem.
School roof under protection
As it has been proved, a green roof may present itself as a rich eco- system worthy of legal protection within a relatively short time. This was the case with the ecological composition on the roof atop the Sharrow School in Sheffield, UK.
While the new building was being designed, the idea arose to establish atop of it a green, plant-friendly roof for the sake of maintaining plants that create diverse habitats. Accord- ing to Nigel Dunnett, the building GHVLJQHU WKH DLP ZDV WRrFUHDWH
plantings that would be visually and aesthetically important for most of the year, and to ensure garden bio- diversity with minimum resource and PDLQWHQDQFHUHTXLUHPHQWVs>6KDUURZ
3ULPDU\6FKRRO@r7KHZLOGJDUGHQs
ZDVHVWDEOLVKHGLQ$OPRVW
plants were planted there, and annual meadow plants were seeded, which then began to spread. Moreover, the introduction of native species was planned, while the conditions for spontaneous appearance of surround- ing herbaceous plants were sought.
The designed composition did not incorporate grasses due to their ex- pansive nature
+RZHYHU SODQWV ZHUH QRW WKH
sole objective of the described green roof. The garden was also diversified so as to be friendly for invertebrates DQGELUGV>6KDUURZ6FKRROu*UHHQ
(VWDWH/DQGVFDSHf@(YHQWXDOO\VHY- eral habitats were formed, including meadow compositions, calcareous xerothermic grasslands, pond-related moist environment, spontaneous rud- eral habitat, and, in a limited form, pioneer groups of self-seeding trees.
The roof became subject to specialist care treatments conducted by ex- perienced gardeners and landscape architects in order to ensure the expected aesthetic and conservation effects. Unwanted and expansive plants are regularly removed, tree seedlings are rejuvenated as soon as they reach 2 metres in height, while in areas not designated for trees and shrubs, young plants are removed and gravel bands are cleaned so as to prevent the structure from attract- ing moisture. The nurturing works are reported, the tasks undertaken are described, and so are the changes in plant cover as well as any altera- tions with respect to chief species of flora and fauna. The entire project is complemented by photographic documentation. Within two years of establishing the green roof, an increase in species diversity has been observed. On the roof, a spon- taneous appearance of several plant species has been identified, among ZKLFKWKHUHZHUHFRPPRQ\DUURZ
($FKLOOHD PLOOHIROLXP), oxeeyedaisy (/HXFDQWKHPXP YXOJDUH), mugwort
($UHPLVLDYXOJDULV), common ragwort (-DFREHD YXOJDULV), common mulein (9HUEDVFXP WKDSVXV), red valerian (&HQWUDQWKXVUXEHU), purple toadflax (/LQDULD SXUSXUHD) and species this- tles (&LUVLXP sp.), asters ($VWHU sp.), coltsfoot (7XVVLODJR sp.), hawkbit (/HRQWRGRQsp.) and teasels ('LSVDFXV
VS>+DELWDW$FWLRQ3ODQ@$VIDU
as birds are concerned, some of the observed species included the black redstart (3KRHQLFXUXVRFKUXURV), gold- finch (&DUGXHOLV FDUGXHOLV), kestrel ()DOFRWLQQXQFXOXV), sparrow (3DVVHU
GRPHVWLFXV), house martin ('HOLFKRQ
XUELFD), pied wagtail (0RWDFLOOD DOED), song thrush (7XUGXVSKLORPHORV) and starling (6WXUQXV YROJDULV >+DELWDW
$FWLRQ 3ODQ @ 7KHUHIRUH WKH
Sheffield city authorities, in coopera- tion with Natural England, the British organization for nature conservation, decided (2009) to grant the green roof of the Sharrow school the status of the Local Nature Reserve.
The garden has become an ele- ment of the context of both the green infrastructure in relations to Sheffield, together with the nearby Mont Pleas- ant Park and the City Natural System.
At the same time, it assumed a place in a more broadly understood system of objects valuable for their natural function and thus protected. Unfor- tunately, for the purposes of protec- tion, the access to the green roof was limited for pupils. On the lower level, children have a terrace at their disposal, in the form of an open-air hall with a small area covered with vegetation, while the actual garden,
(/HRQWRGRQ sp) i szczeci ('LSVDFXV
sp.) >+DELWDW $FWLRQ 3ODQ @
=SWDNÑZ ]DREVHUZRZDQR PLQ
kopciuszka europejskiego (3KRHQL
FXUXVRFKUXURVV]F]\JäD&DUGXHOLV
FDUGXHOLVSXVWXäNö]Z\F]DMQñ)DOFR
WLQQXQFXOXV ZUÑEOD ]Z\F]DMQHJR
(3DVVHUGRPHVWLFXVMDVNÑäNöRNQÑZ- Nö 'HOLFKRQ XUELFD SOLV]Nö VLZñ
(0RWDFLOOD DOED GUR]GD ĈSLHZDND
(7XUGXV SKLORPHORV) i szpaka zwy- czajnego (6WXUQXV YROJDULV >+DELWDW
$FWLRQ3ODQ@:]ZLñ]NX]W\P
ZäDG]HPLDVWD6KHIILHOGZHZVSÑäSUD- F\ ]EU\W\MVNñ RUJDQL]DFMñ RFKURQ\
SU]\URG\u1DWXUDO(QJODQG]GHF\- GRZDä\ZURQDGDQLX]LHORQH- PXGDFKRZLV]NRä\6KDUURZVWDWXVX
Lokalnego Rezerwatu Przyrody.
2JUÑGVWDäVLöHOHPHQWHPNRQ- WHNVWX]DUÑZQR]LHORQHMLQIUDVWUXNWXU\
Sheffield z pobliskim parkiem Mont Pleasant i systemu przyrodniczego PLDVWDMDNLV\VWHPXRELHNWÑZSU]\- rodniczo cennych i chronionych.
1LHVWHW\ ]HZ]JOöGX QDRFKURQö
RJUDQLF]RQR GRVWöS GOD XF]QLÑZ
1DSR]LRPLH GROQ\P G]LHFL PDMñ
GRG\VSR]\FML WDUDV u VDOö QDĈZLH- Ĕ\PSRZLHWU]X]QLHZLHONLPREV]D- UHP SRNU\W\P URĈOLQQRĈFLñ 1DWR- PLDVWZäDĈFLZ\RJUÑGuQDSR]LRPLH
JÑUQ\PuRJOñGDMñSRSU]H]RFKURQQH
V]NODQHEDOXVWUDG\QLHPRJñREVHU- ZRZDè]EOLVNDVWDZXSä\ZDMñF\FK
ZQLP NLMDQHN QLH PDMñ PRĔOLZR- ĈFL GRW\NDQLD LSR]QDZDQLD URĈOLQ
>3URFWHULLQ@-HVWWRSRZDĔQ\
SUREOHP LGXĔH QLHGRFLñJQLöFLH
ZSURJUDPLH HGXNDF\MQ\P V]NRä\
&DäDVSRäHF]QRĈèV]NROQDMHVWGXPQD
LPRFQR XWRĔVDPLD VLö ]ORNDOQ\P
rezerwatem przyrody na dachu, ale MHGQRF]HĈQLH QLH PRĔH ]QLHJR DN- W\ZQLHNRU]\VWDè>3URFWHULLQ
$ZDUGIRUVFKRROVpJUHHQqURRI@
Zielony dach
elementem struktury funkcjonalno-
-przestrzennej i systemu przyrodniczego
metropolii
:NDĔG\P ]SU]\WRF]RQ\FK
SU]\NäDGÑZ ]LHORQH URĈOLQQH GDFK\
RND]Dä\ VLö ZDĔQH G]LöNL VZRMHPX
ERJDFWZX JDWXQNRZHPX L]DF]öä\
IXQNFMRQRZDè MDNR RD]\ ELRUÑĔQR- URGQRĈFL PLHMVNLHM 6SRQWDQLF]QLH
SRMDZLDMñ VLö QDQLFK RNROLF]QH
URĈOLQ\ DOH UÑZQLHĔ RGQRWRZ\ZD- QH VñSWDNL LRZDG\ ZW\P PLQ
zapylacze. Potwierdza to pozytyw- Q\ ZSä\Z VñVLHG]WZD HOHPHQWÑZ
systemu przyrodniczego miasta, jak SDUNLF]\NRPSOHNV\OHĈQHQDVWUXN- WXUö JDWXQNRZñ ]LHORQ\FK GDFKÑZ
=DUÑZQR 6DUJIDEULN MDN L´NRZHUN
F]\6KDUURZZSLVDä\VLöZNRQWHNVW
systemu przyrodniczego miasta i sieci ]LHORQHMLQIUDVWUXNWXU\VWDMñFVLöHOH- mentem struktury funkcjonalno-prze- strzennej Sheffield czy metropolii, MDNSRND]Dä\WRSU]\NäDG\]:LHGQLD
L%HUOLQD >/XQGKROP @ :DUWR
WDNĔH]ZUÑFLèXZDJöĔHZNDĔG\P
]SU]\SDGNÑZUR]ZLñ]DQLD]LHORQHJR
GDFKX E\ä\ SURMHNWRZDQH ]P\ĈOñ
RG]\VNDQLD FKRèE\ F]öĈFLRZHJR powierzchni biologicznie czyn- nych na terenach zurbanizowanych.
:SU]\SDGNX6DUJIDEULNE\äRWRSR- szukiwanie dodatkowego miejsca rekreacji w bardzo intensywnej zabu- GRZLH PLHV]NDQLRZHM :´NRZHUN
doceniono i uszanowano ponad 100-letni spontanicznie utworzony SU]H]QDWXUö]LHORQ\GDFKL]DGEDQR
DE\ RQSU]HWUZDä QDZHW ZÑZF]DV
gdy rozebrano strop. W przypadku 6KHIILHOG UR]EXGRZD V]NRä\ ]DMöäD
VSRUñF]öĈèG]LDäNLFRVSRZRGRZDäR
SRWU]HEöLQWHJURZDQLDWHUHQX]LHOHQL
przestrzeni rekreacyjnych i edukacyj- Q\FKQDĈZLHĔ\PSRZLHWU]X]IRUPñ
DUFKLWHNWRQLF]Qñ
:UD] ]HZ]URVWHP UÑĔQRURG- QRĈFLSU]\URGQLF]HM]LHORQHJRGDFKX
]ZLöNV]DVLö]DLQWHUHVRZDQLHSRWHQ- FMDOQ\FK XĔ\WNRZQLNÑZ -DN SRND- ]XMñ SU]\WRF]RQH SU]\NäDG\ MHGQñ
]ZDĔQ\FKIXQNFMLWDNLFKPLHMVFVWDMH
VLöLFKURODLQWHJUDF\MQDu]DUÑZQR
ZZ\PLDU]H LQWHJUDFML VSRäHF]QHM
w Sargfabrik, jak i integracji z miej- scem w przypadku Sheffield czy identyfikowania miejsca poprzez IRUPö]LHORQHJRGDFKXZ´NRZHUN
Wnioski
Wyniki obserwacji opisanych SU]\NäDGÑZ Vñ]ELHĔQH ]SURZD- G]RQ\PL EDGDQLDPL GRW\F]ñF\PL
]GROQRĈFL Z\NRU]\VWDQLD ]LHORQ\FK
GDFKÑZ ZZDOFH R]DFKRZDQLH
ELRUÑĔQRURGQRĈFL>.DGDV/XQ- GKROP .VLD]HN *UDQW
located on the upper level, may only be watched through protective glass balustrades. The pond or the tadpoles floating in it cannot be closely ob- served, they cannot be touched and getting to know the plants is virtually LPSRVVLEOH>3URFWHUHWDO@7KLV
situation causes a serious problem and a deficiency in the educational program of the school. The entire school community takes pride in and strongly identifies itself with the Local Nature Reserve on the roof, but at the same time they are deprived of the SRVVLELOLW\WRDFWLYHO\XVHLW>3URFWHU
HWDO$ZDUGIRUVFKRROVpJUHHQq
URRI@
Green roof as an
element of the functional and spatial structure of the metropolis natural system
In each of the examples cited, the green roofs covered with vegeta- tion proved vital due to their species richness and they began to function as oases of urban biodiversity. Lo- cal plants appear on such installa- tions spontaneously. Moreover, the appearance of birds and insects is recorded, including also species that serve as pollinators. This fact confirms the positive impact exerted on green roofs species structure by the neighbourhood of elements of the City Natural System, such as
SDUNV RU IRUHVWV 6DUJIDEULN ´NRZ- erk and Sharrow have all joined the wider context of the City Natural System and the green infrastructure network, thereby becoming a part of the functional and spatial structure of Sheffield or of the metropolis, as proved by the examples from Vienna DQG%HUOLQ>/XQGKROP@
It is also worth noting that in each of the above cases, the green roof solutions were designed with the aim to recover (even partially) biologically active surfaces in urban- ized areas. In the case of Sargfabrik, it was a matter of searching for an additional space to be devoted to recreation within a very intense KRXVLQJ GHYHORSPHQW ,Q ´NRZHUN
on the other hand, the green roof was established owing to, above all, the respect and appreciation for the 100-year-old spontaneously created green roof. It was ensured that the roof survived even when the ceiling was demolished. In the case of Shef- field, the expansion of the school took up a large part of the plot on which it was situated, which resulted in the need to integrate the green area, recreational and educational spaces in the open air with the architectural form of the new building.
As the diversity of the green roof increases, the interest shown by its potential users peaks as well. As the examples illustrate, one of the impor- tant functions of such places is their integration role, both in the dimen- sion of social integration seen in case of Sargfabrik, as well as integration
with the place in the Sheffield case or identifying the place through the form of a green roof that was the case LQ´NRZHUN
The observation results ob- tained for the described examples coincide with the research conducted on the possibility to use green roofs as a measure to fight for the preservation RI ELRGLYHUVLW\ >.DGDV /XQG- KROP.VDWHN*UDQWHWDO
@DQGIRUEXLOGLQJDVXVWDLQDEOH
HQYLURQPHQW>*HWWHU5RZH@RI
WKH XUEDQ HFRV\VWHP >2EHUQGRUIHU
HWDO@5HVXOWVRIUHVHDUFKFRQ- GXFWHGPDLQO\LQ*HUPDQ\>.VLD]HN
@ *UHDW %ULWDLQ >.DGDV @
DQG 6ZLW]HUODQG >%UHQQHLVHQ @
FRQILUP WKLV WKHVLV *UHHQ URRIV
become places where one may en- counter species under protection, and even those endangered with H[WLQFWLRQ>%UHQQHLVHQ.DGDV
@7KHUHIRUHSRVWXODWHVDUHXQ- dertaken that, despite land shortages
>%UHQQHLVHQ.VLD]HN0LNHQDV
HWDO@LWLVZRUWKFRQVLGHULQJWKH
possibility of treating green roofs as a significant element of urban green LQIUDVWUXFWXUH >/XQGKROP @ DV
well as an element of the City Natural System. The creation of green roofs should thus be considered on an ur- ban and on a landscape scale while SODQQLQJWKHFLW\GHYHORSPHQW>%UHQ- QHLVHQ@
Depending on the building de- velopment parameters, green roofs may perform important integrative, recreational and educational func- WLRQV >=LQRZLHF&LHSOLN @ IRU
LLQ@RUD]EXGRZDQLH]UÑZQR- ZDĔRQHJRĈURGRZLVND>*HWWHU5RZH
@HNRV\VWHPXPLHMVNLHJR>2EH- UQGRUIHULLQ@%DGDQLDSURZD- dzone przede wszystkim w Niem- F]HFK :LHONLHM %U\WDQLL >.DGDV
@L6]ZDMFDULL>%UHQQHLVHQ@
SRWZLHUG]DMñWDNñWH]ö1D]LHORQ\FK
GDFKDFKVSRW\NDQHVñJDWXQNL]JUXS
REMöW\FK RFKURQñ DQDZHW JDWXQNL
]DJURĔRQHZ\JLQLöFLHP>%UHQQHLVHQ
.DGDV@:]ZLñ]NX]W\P
SRGHMPRZDQHVñSRVWXODW\ĔHPLPR
QLHGRVWDWNÑZ SRGäRĔD >%UHQQHLVHQ
.VLD]HN0LNHQDVLZVS@
ZDUWR]DVWDQRZLèVLöQDGPRĔOLZR- ĈFLñ WUDNWRZDQLD ]LHORQ\FK GDFKÑZ
w kategorii istotnego elementu zielo- QHMLQIUDVWUXNWXU\>/XQGKROP@
jak i systemu przyrodniczego miasta RUD]ZVNDOLXUEDQLVW\F]QHMDWDNĔH
ZVNDOLNUDMREUD]XuSU]\MHJRSODQR- ZDQLX>%UHQQHLVHQ@
:]DOHĔQRĈFL RGSDUDPHWUÑZ
]DEXGRZ\ ]LHORQH GDFK\ PRJñ
SHäQLè ZDĔQH UROH LQWHJUDF\MQH
UHNUHDF\MQHLHGXNDF\MQH>=LQRZLHF-
&LHSOLN @ ZVSRäHF]QRĈFL OR- NDOQHMJG\ĔPLHV]NDþF\SRWU]HEXMñ
NRQWDNWX ]SU]\URGñ >.HOOHUW LLQ
%URZQLQJLLQ@$QDOL]R- ZDQHUHDOL]DFMHVWDQRZLñSU]\NäDG\
NV]WDäWRZDQLDVWUXNWXU\SU]\URGQLF]HM
LVSRäHF]QHM QDSRGVWDZLH ]DJRVSR- GDURZDQLD IXQNFMRQDOQHJR eSLñWHM
HOHZDFMLs
6SRVÑE ]DJRVSRGDURZDQLD
GDFKÑZSU]\HIHNW\ZQ\PZ\NRU]\- VWDQLX]LHOHQLMHVWLVWRWQ\ZNV]WDäWR- waniu systemu zieleni miejskiej i sys- temu przyrodniczego metropolii. Nie
jest to jednak jedyny aspekt realizacji zieleni na dachach. Powierzchnie biologicznie czynne zintegrowane ]EXG\QNLHP VWDQRZLñ RELRUÑĔQR- URGQRĈFL LRGSRUQRĈFL HNRV\VWHPX
RUD]ZSä\ZDMñQDNV]WDäWRZDQLHĈUR- dowiska miejskiego i mikroklimatu.
)XQNFMHWRZDU]\V]ñFH]LHOHQLQDGD- FKXVWDQRZLñX]XSHäQLHQLHVWUXNWXU\
funkcjonalno-przestrzennej metropo- OLL1DMF]öĈFLHMZVND]\ZDQHVñIXQN- FMHVSRäHF]QHuLQWHJUDFMDXĔ\WNRZ- QLNÑZ HGXNDF\MQH UHNUHDF\MQH
i produkcyjne (farmy miejskie). Spo- VÑE]DJRVSRGDURZDQLDGDFKÑZLUH- alizacja zieleni na dachach powinny VWDQRZLè SU]HGPLRW RSUDFRZDQLD
urbanistycznego, architektonicznego, krajobrazowego oraz przyrodniczego LVRFMRORJLF]QHJR1LHVWHW\SRWHQFMDä
]DJRVSRGDURZDQLD GDFKÑZ QLH MHVW
REHFQLH ZSHäQL Z\NRU]\VW\ZDQ\
Realizacja zieleni na dachu nie jest MHV]F]HVWDQGDUGHP,VWRWQHVñ]DWHP
rozpowszechnianie i analiza dobrych SU]\NäDGÑZUHDOL]DFML]LHORQ\FKGD- FKÑZZLHORIXQNF\MQ\FKZVND]XMñF
PRĔOLZRĈFL SURMHNWRZH L]QDF]HQLH
GOD VSRäHF]QRĈFL ORNDOQHM V\VWHPX
przyrodniczego i krajobrazu metro- polii. Konieczne jest podejmowanie LQWHUG\VF\SOLQDUQHMZVSÑäSUDF\SUR- MHNWDQWÑZ EUDQĔRZ\FK RUD] DQDOL- W\NÑZ LGRUDGFÑZ LQZHVW\F\MQ\FK
w celu opracowania dobrych stan- GDUGÑZLZ\W\F]Q\FKUHDOL]DF\MQ\FK
RSUDFRZ\ZDQLD]LHORQ\FKGDFKÑZ
=DVDGQH MHVW UÑZQLHĔ RNUHĈOHQLH
QRZ\FK SDUDPHWUÑZ LZVNDĒQL- NÑZ XUEDQLVW\F]Q\FK ZGUDĔDQ\FK
w opracowaniach planistycznych
gminy oraz miejscowych planach zagospodarowania przestrzennego, ZNWÑU\FK]LHORQHGDFK\ZVND]\ZD- QHE\ä\E\MDNRX]XSHäQLHQLHVWUXNWXU\
funkcjonalno-przestrzennej miasta.
.LQJD=LQRZLHF&LHSOLN :\G]LDä$UFKLWHNWXU\
3ROLWHFKQLND:DUV]DZVND
/LWHUDWXUHu/LWHUDWXUD
1. $ZDUG IRU VFKRROV pJUHHQq URRI
%%& 1HZV KWWSQHZVEEF
co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/south_
\RUNVKLUHVWP >DFFHVV GDWH
@
2. Brenneisen S., 2006. Space for urban ZLOGOLIH'HVLJQLQJJUHHQURRIVDVKDELWDWV
LQ6ZLW]HUODQG8UEDQ+DELWDWV
3. Browning et al., 2014. 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design7HUUDSLQ%ULJKW*UHHQ
LLC, New York.
4. Colla S.R, Willis E., Packer L., 2009.
Can green roofs provide habitat for urban EHHV+\PHQRSWHUD$SLGDH"&LWLHVDQG
the Environment, Volume 2, Issue 1.
5. Dunnett N., Nolan A., 2004. The effect of substrate depth and supple- mentary watering on the growth of nine herbaceous perennial in a semi-extensi- YH JUHHQ URRI$FWD+RUWLFXOWXUDH
,6+6/HXYHQ
6. *UDQW * HW DO *UHHQ URRIV
uH[LVWLQJVWDWXVDQGSRWHQWLDOIRUFRQVH- rving biodiversity in urban areas. English Nature Research Report, No. 498.
*HWWHU ./ 5RZH '% 7KH
role of extensive green roofs in sustaina- EOHGHYHORSPHQW+RUW6FLHQFH
8. +DELWDW$FWLRQ3ODQ6KHIILHOG
Local Biodiversity Action Partnership. The
*DUGHQ5RRI&HQWHU6KHIILHOG
9. KWWSZZZWKHJUHHQURRIFHQWUHFRXN
Library/Default/Documents/Sheffield%20
the local community, as inhabitants absolutely need contact with nature
>.HOOHUW HW DO %URZQLQJ HW DO
@ 7KH DQDO\]HG SURMHFWV DUH
examples of shaping the natural and social structure on the basis of the IXQFWLRQDOGHYHORSPHQWRIWKHrILIWK
IDÅDGHs
Conclusion
The method of developing roofs with the effective use of greenery is essential for shaping the urban green- ery system and the metropolis natural V\VWHP+RZHYHUWKLVLVQRWWKHRQO\
aspect of introducing greenery atop of roofs. Actually, biologically active surfaces integrated with buildings are responsible for securing biodiversity and resilience of the ecosystem. They also influence the shaping of urban environment and its microclimate.
The functions accompanying the greenery on the roof complement the functional and spatial structure of the metropolis. Social functions are among the most often indicated RQHV7KHVHLQFOXGHXVHULQWHJUDWLRQ
educational, recreational and pro- duction (urban farms) functions. The methods of developing roofs and the implementation of greenery on roofs should be considered a subject of urban, architectural, landscape, natural and sociological planning.
Unfortunately, the potential for roof management is not yet fully applied.
Implementation of greenery on roof has not become a standard as yet.
Therefore, it is important to dissemi- nate and analyse well-functioning examples of multifunctional green roofs, indicating design opportunities, as well as the significance of such projects for the local community, the natural system and the landscape of the metropolis. It is necessary to un- dertake interdisciplinary cooperation between designers, analysts, and in- vestment advisors in order to develop good standards and implementation guidelines for the development of green roofs. It is also reasonable to define new parameters and urban indicators introduced in the studies concerning commune planning and local spatial development plans, in which the green roofs would be in- dicated as a supplement to the func- tional and spatial structure of the city.
.LQJD=LQRZLHF&LHSOLN )DFXOW\RI$UFKLWHFWXUH
:DUVDZ8QLYHUVLW\RI7HFKQRORJ\
*UHHQ5RRI+$3)HE
BSGI>DFFHVV
GDWH@
10. .DGDV * 5DUH LQYHUWHEUDWHV
colonizing green roofs in London. Urban +DELWDWV
11. .HOOHUWHWDO%LRSKLOLF'HVLJQ
The Theory, Science & Practice of Brin- JLQJ %XLOGLQJV WR/LIH +RERNHQ -RKQ
Wiley & Sons, New York.
12. Ksiazek K., 2015. Roof Top Insect
&RPPXQLWLHV %HUOLQ ´NRZHUN 1DWXUH
&REVHUYHDWLRQ &HQWHU %HUOLQ *HUPDQ\
>LQ@*UHHQ5RRI(FRV\VWHPV6XWWRQ5.
(ed.) Springer, Basel.
13. Ksiazek K., 2014. The potential of green roofs to support urban biodiversity,
>LQ@*UHHQ&LWLHVLQWKH:RUOG%UL]-
Kohler M., de Felipe I. (ed.), Cimapress.
14. Ksiazek-Mikenas K. et.al., 2018. If You Build It, Will They Come? Plant and
$UWKURSRG 'LYHUVLW\ RQ8UEDQ *UHHQ
5RRIV2YHU7LPH*UHHQ5RRIVDQG8UEDQ
Biodiversity, URBAN NATURALIST, Spe- cial Issue, 1.
15. /XQGKROP-*UHHQURRISODQW
species diversity improves ecosystem multifunctionality, Journal of Applied Ecology, 52.
16. 2EHUQGRUIHU ( HW DO *UHHQ
5RRIV DV 8UEDQ (FRV\VWHPV (FRORJLFDO
Structures, Functions, and Services.
%LR6FLHQFH1RYHPEHU9RO1R
Procter L., James A., Curtis P., 2012.
0\ *UHHQ 5RRI 6KDUURZ 6FKRRO 6KHI- field. Centre for the Study of Childhood and Youth, Departmenet of Landscape;
)DFXOW\ RI 6RFLDO 6FLHQFHV *UHHQ 5RRI
Centre, University of Sheffield, Lindum Turf Ltd.
18. 6KDUURZ3ULDPU\6FKRROKWWSZZZ
greenroofs.com/projects/sharrow-prima- U\VFKRRO>DFFHVVGDWH@
19. 6KDUURZ3ULPDU\6FKRRO*UHHQURRIV
FRPKWWSZZZJUHHQURRIVFRPSURMHFWV
VKDUURZSULPDU\VFKRRO >DFFHVV GDWH
@
20. 6KDUURZ6FKRROu*UHHQ(VWDWH/DQG- VFDSH KWWSVZZZJUHHQHVWDWHODQGVFD- pes.com/turf-case-studies/2018/1/11/
VKDUURZVFKRRO>DFFHVVGDWH@
21. Toniettoa R., 2011. A comparison of bee communities of Chicago green roofs, parks and prairies, Landscape and Urban Planning 103 (2011).
22. =LQRZLHF&LHSOLN.3RWHQFMDä
LQWHJUDFMLIRUPURĈOLQQ\FK]DUFKLWHNWXUñ
uNXOWXUDLVSRäHF]HþVWZRPHWURSROLL=H- V]\W\1DXNRZH8F]HOQL9LVWXODu9LVWXOD
8QLYHUVLW\:DUNLQJ3DSHUVu$UFKLWHNWXUD
nr 61(4).