van den berg A.J.: enforcement of annulled awards?, (998) 9() ICC intl Ct Arb.
bull 5, 8.
van den berg A.J.: enforcement of arbitral awards in russia: case comment on court of appeal of amsterdam, April 8, 009, 7() J Intl. Arb 79.
van den berg A.J.: should setting aside of the arbitral award be abolished?, ICsId review 04.
Cardozo b.n.: The Paradoxes of Legal science, Clark, new Jersey: lawbook exchange 0.
dolzer r., scheuer C.: Principles of International Investment Law, oxford: oxford university Press, 008.
history of the ICsId Convention: documents Concerning the origin and the For-mulation of the Convention on the settlement of Investment disputes between states and nationals of other states vol. I–Iv (970), 4, at vol. II.
Pufendorf s.: De jure naturae et gentium, oldfarber Translation, 688 edition, oxford 934, vol. II, book v.
Ziegler A.: scope and function of the wTo appelate system: what future after millenium round?, (999) 3 Max Planck yearbook of united nations law 439.
InTerneT sourCes
a Handbook on the wTo Dispute settlement system: a wTo secretariat Publica-tion, World Trade organizaPublica-tion, Cambridge university Press, 004, source:
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/disp_settlement_cbt_e/signin_e.
Background paper on annulment for the administrative council of IcsID, eletro-htm.
nicvon, source: https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICsIdWeb/resources/docu-ments/background%0report%0on%0Annulment_english.pdf.
ICsId secretariat: Possible Improvements of the framework for IcsID arbitration,
october 004, source: https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICsIdWeb/resources/
documents/Possible%0Improvements%0of%0the%0Framework%0of%
0ICsId%0Arbitration.pdf.
ICsId secretariat: suggested changes to the IcsID rules and regulations, May
005, source: https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICsIdWeb/resources/docu-ments/suggested%0Changes%0to%0the%0ICsId%0rules%0and%0 regulations.pdf.
Mcrae d.: The wTo appellate Body: a model for and IcsID appeals facility?, Journal of Intenrational dispute settlement (00) (), p. 369, source: http://jids.
oxfordjournals.org/content///37.full.
schreuer C.h. (009): The IcsID convention. [online]. nd ed. Cambridge: Cam-bridge university Press.
schreuer C.: from IcsID annulment to appeal — Half way Down the slippery slope, The law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 0 (0), source: http://www.univie.ac.at/intlaw/wordpress/pdf/lape_00_0__5.pdf.
Tams C.J.: an appealing option? The debate about IcsID appellate structure, p. 4, source: http://www.economiclaw.uni-halle.de/sites/default/files/altbestand/
heft57.pdf.
Tams C.d.: experiences from the wTo appellate Body, Texas International law Journal, vol. 38, no. 3, source: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj/vol6/
iss6//.
WTo Agreements: Understanding on rules and Procedures governing the settle-ment of Disputes, Annex to WTo Agreesettle-ment, (994) 33 Il.M 6, source:
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dsu_e.htm
PerIodICs ICsId discussion Paper.
yearbook of the International law Commission , u.n. doc. A/Cn.4/ser.
A/953/Add. , Article 30 of the draft Convention on Arbitral Procedure.
yearbook of the International law Commission 84, u.n. doc. A/Cn.4/ser.A/95;
953 IlC yearbook I.
yearbook of the International law Commission 66, u.n. doc. A/Cn.4/ser.A/95/
Add. ; 953 IlC yearbook II.
CAse lAW
amco v. Indonesia, (amco II) decision on Annulment, 3 december 99, source:
https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&action Val=showDoc&docId=DC663_En&caseId=C126.
burroughs J. in: richardson v. mellish, bing. 9 (84), source: http://www.
uniset.ca/other/css/30er94.html.
cDc v. seyshelles, decision on Annulment, 9 June 005, source: http://opil.ouplaw.
com/view/0.093/law:iic/48-005.case./IIC048(005)d.pdf.
compañiá de aguas del aconquija s.a. and Vivendi Universal s.a. v. argentina, decission on annulment, 3 July 00, source: http://www.italaw.com/sites/
default/files/case-documents/ita0210.pdf.
Cour d’appel de Paris, Decision of 15 May 1997 (Ire Ch. C), (1998) Revue de Arbitrage, source: http://www.newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_
display&id=161&seule=1.
enron v. argentina, decision on Annulment, 30 July 00, source: http://www.italaw.
com/documents/enronAnnulmentdecision.pdf.
fraport v. Philippines, decision on Annulment, 3 december 00, source: http://
www.italaw.com/documents/Fraport-Annulment-decision.pdf.
Klöckner Industrie-anlagen gmbH and others v. United republic of cameroon and société camerounaise des engrais (Klöckner I), ICsId Case no. Arb/8/, decision of the ad hoc Committee, source: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICsId/
FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC664&ca seId=C127.
mitchell v. congo, Decision on annulment, november 006, source: http://www.
italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0537.pdf.
wena v. egypt, decision on Annulment from 5 of February 00, source: http://www.
italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0903.pdf.
yukos capital sarL v. oao rosneft, gerecht-shof Amsterdam lJn bI 45,
00.005.369 (8 April 009) s 3.5, source: http://iiiglobal.org/component/jdown-loads/finish/170/4135.html.
yukos capital sarL v. ojsc rosneft oil company [0] eWCA CIv 855 (7 June
0), source: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/eWCA/Civ/0/855.html.
yukos capital sarL v. ojsc rosneft oil company [04] eWhC 88 (Comm), source: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/eWhC/Comm/04/88.html.
AleksAnder Wróbel
The ICsId AnnulMenT CoMMITTee:
The blossoMIng FloWer or The roTTen ToMATo
s u m m a r y
The article discusses the question of the annulment proceedings under the ICSID sys-tem juxtaposed to the situation existing in international commercial arbitration. The analysis is supported with the presentation of the historical development of the grounds of an annul-ment under the ICsId system and practice formed throughout years of work of the Annulannul-ment Committees. Furthermore, the papers discusses the issue of setting aside awards under the international commercial arbitration by giving examples of the basic regulations in the area, practice in domestic legal systems of selected countries which have in some measure more liberal approach to the setting aside of the awards.
The following parts consist in analysis of the problematic aspects of the annulment system under the ICsId Convention and of the setting aside of awards in the international commercial arbitration.
Its final part is an attempt to find solutions to the presented problems by depicting pos-sible elucidations which can be borrowed from the ICsId system and adopted in the interna-tional commercial arbitration and vice versa. The author puts forward the suggestions of the model of an appellate body notwithstanding that final approach is that in today’s practice there is no prerequisite to change the system of the revision under the ICSID convention.