• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

This dissertation aimed at discussing the issue of prevocalic consonant epenthesis in selected Slavic and Germanic languages in two distinct environments ̶ in vowel hiatus, and at the beginning of a constituent. It has been shown on the example of glide epenthesis that depending on the environment (that is, __V or VV), the process itself can be analyzed separately, employing two distinct models of analysis.

As argued in Chapter 1, CV syllables are considered unmarked and thus the most universal cross-linguistically. There is ample evidence that onsetless syllables are dispreferred and consequently avoided. Languages employ several strategies of providing syllables with onsets. The typological overview supplied in Chapter 2 indicated that this generalization extends to selected Slavic and Germanic languages.

The main focus of this dissertation was the operation of prevocalic consonant epenthesis, which in Chapter 2 was discussed with reference to two separate criteria

̶ the site of epenthesis, that is, the position in which the process takes place, and the quality of the epenthetic segment. As for the site of epenthesis, two distinct environments were discussed: vowel hiatus, and the left edge of a constituent, such as, for instance, the morphological word, morphological root or stressed syllable. In the languages discussed, there are recurring patterns of prevocalic consonant insertion. Depending on the quality of the surrounding vowels and other factors, such as for instance, stress pattern, vowel hiatus is usually resolved with a homorganic glide or a glottal stop. At the left edge of the constituent, however, glottal stops are more frequent than glides. There are, however, languages, which insert glides at the beginning of words. Such occurrences are found, for instance, in some dialects of Polish and in Kashubian. In addition, it was shown that English stands out among all the languages discussed because it takes /r/ as an epenthetic consonant.

Chapter 3 showed that to date, the issue of prevocalic consonant insertion has been captured using a considerable number of theoretical approaches. In the present dissertation, the distinction was made between analyses in the generative and listener-oriented models. The section devoted to generative models provided an outline of analyses carried out in the early generative spirit of SPE phonology and Autosegmental Phonology, which, however, did not aim at optimizing syllable structure. Later models, developed in the 1990s such as Optimality Theory started to consider the

173

optimal syllable structure an important element of phonological formalism. It was shown that the OT model relies on the notion of markedness. Crucially for this dissertation, it was indicated that cross-linguistically, syllables that have onsets are less marked than onsetless syllables. In optimality-theoretic analyses, this requirement is expressed by the markedness constraint ONSET. The review of selected analyses in Chapter 3 showed that in languages that do not tolerate onsetless syllables, ONSET

needs to be ranked higher than DEP-IO, the constraint which militates against insertions. In addition, the typological overview in Chapter 2 indicated that some languages restrict consonant insertion to selected environments, such as the beginning of words or stressed syllables. In terms of OT, this requirement is achievable by postulating constraints such as ALIGN-L (which bans constituent-initial epenthesis) or CONTIGUITY (no insertion constituent-internally). Thus, from the perspective of OT, prevocalic consonant insertion aims at reducing markedness by providing onsetless syllables with an onset. However, the markedness- and ONSET- driven account of prevocalic consonant insertion has been challenged in the literature, notably by Blevins (2008). Blevins (2008) proposes a diachronic, evolutionary account to explain the emergence of, for instance, intervocalic glides. In OT terms, intervocalic glides are interpreted as onset-filling segments, which satisfy the constraint ONSET. Blevins (2008) uses the reconstructed linguistic data to show that intervocalic glides may arise as a result of a reinterpretation of formant transitions, which naturally occur between vowels of certain qualities. Blevins argues that this reinterpretation is more likely to appear in languages that have pre-existing segmental glides in different contexts.

According to Blevins (2008), the formant transitions that are interpreted as glides may undergo phonologization and further a sound change, such as glide hardening. Thus, Blevins (2008) rejects the markedness-driven explanations of glide insertion cast in models such as OT.

The literature overview indicated that in certain environments, markedness fails to make correct predictions. For instance, as discussed in Chapter 3, Blevins (2008) and Czaplicki (2010b) argue that markedness-based accounts sometimes make wrong predictions regarding segment insertion. The analysis of emergent stops in English and Polish by Czaplicki (2010b) indicated that OT and its driving force, i.e., markedness do not predict epenthesis of /p/ in words such as /samsən/ → [sampsən]. Czaplicki (2010b) shows that the analysis of this insertion in OT resulted in winning the evaluation by the candidate */samsən/, which does not, however, reflect the facts. OT is driven by markedness, and the syllable structure of the actual surface form is

174

considered marked. Instead, Czaplicki (2010b) rejects the term ‘insertion’ and uses a phonetic explanation. Stops emerge as a result of the coarticulation of neighboring segments. In her analysis, Blevins (2008) shows that synchronic, markedness-based accounts are insufficient to explain the insertion of segments such as /dz/ and /gw/.

In the synchronic approach of OT, these segments are highly marked. However, the diachronic path indicates that these segments results from the earlier glide strengthening of /j/ and /w/, respectively. Hence a diachronic, two-step way is needed to correctly account for the insertion.

Chapter 4 laid out the proposed model of analysis of glide insertion. The model of analysis considers the two environments, that is, word-initial position and vowel hiatus separately. The data from Kashubian were used to advocate the view that word-initially glides are inserted to provide syllables with onsets. This occurrence has been expressed formally within the OT framework, which proved well-equipped to explain this phenomenon. The shortcomings of standard OT, however, appeared in the analysis of prefixed words in which the prefix ends with a consonant and the stems begins with a vowel. It has been shown that in such cases Derivational Optimality Theory, which postulates level distinction, can be successfully applied to analyze epenthesis in such words. As for glide insertion in the intervocalic position, it was postulated that there is no need to account for the process in phonological terms. The summary of the analysis proposed by Blevins (2008) showed that the occurrence of seemingly epenthetic glides may be viewed as a result of a natural formant transition in hiati where one of the vowels is high. Users of languages that have glides in different contexts are prone to perceive this transition as a separate segment. One of such languages is Polish, which has glides /j/ and /w/ in contexts not related to insertion.

Thus, it was proposed that the previously postulated epenthetic glides in vowel hiatus may be explained as a perceptually-driven sound change. It was not clear, however, if the transitional (or epenthetic) glides differ in realization from lexical glides. In order to examine the possible difference, two perception studies were conducted on some users of Polish.

Chapter 5 discussed two behavioral studies conducted on the users of Polish. As said above, both studies aimed to determine whether there is a perceptual difference between lexical glides in words similar to buła [ˈbuwa] ‘big bread roll’ and transitional/epenthetic glides in words spelled like statua [staˈtua]/[staˈtuwa] ‘statue’.

175

While it is universally agreed that the words that end in <-uła> are realized with a lexical glide, there are also words that end with <-ua> in spelling, such as statua

‘statue’, which lack a unanimous interpretation. It remains unclear whether the words are realized with a glottal stop, an unresolved vowel hiatus or a transitional/epenthetic glide. To avoid bias, the study was run on nonce words that were divided into two groups, i.e., spelled <uła> and <ua>. Then, the participants were exposed to the recordings of those words made by a speaker of Polish. In the first experiment, a small group of phonetically trained participants was asked to decide if they perceive a difference in realization between the two groups of words. The results showed that the phonetically trained participants failed to distinguish differences in the realization of words spelled <ua> and <uła>. However, the results also showed that according to the participants, there were no glottal stop realizations. In the second, main experiment, a group of users of Polish was asked to decline the forms they hear according to the declension pattern they are already familiar with, that is, those of buła and statua. One of the hypotheses pertained to frequency effects. It was hypothesized that there might be a bias towards the more frequent declension pattern, in this case, the one of buła. The results of the experiment indicated that the declension pattern was applied at a similar rate, thus there was no bias in terms of frequency of the declension pattern. The similar rate of responses also indicated that the participants did not perceive substantial differences in the realization of words spelled

<uła> and <ua>.

The results of both studies have theoretical implications. If, as the results showed, there is no perceptual difference in the realization of lexical and transitional/epenthetic glides, the glides in words such as statua [staˈtua]/[staˈtuwa]

may be interpreted as intervocalic transition effects. Under such a view, the glides which emerge intervocalically may be interpreted as natural phonetically-conditioned occurrence rather than a phonological operation satisfying the constraint ONSET in the optimality-theoretic accounts. In addition, the evidence from the corpus of Polish, indicated that the declension of words ending in <ua> in Polish is sometimes aligned with the declension of words such as buła [ˈbuwa], with a lexical glide. Thus, one arrives at forms such as *statuła in the nominative singular and *statule in the dative and locative. Such evidence may indicate that the transitional glide has undergone phonologization, which aligns with the model proposed by Blevins (2008).

176

While the studies in Chapter 5 indicated that there are no perceptual differences between the lexical and transitional/epenthetic segments, the difference has not been examined articulatorily. One may not preclude the possibility that while the glides are indistinguishable perceptually, there are differences in their phonetic implementation.

Thus, an articulatory study of the glides remains to be carried out in future research.

177

References

Alber, Birgit (2001). Regional variation and edges: Glottal stop epenthesis and dissimilation in standard and southern varieties of German. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 20: 3–41.

Albright, Adam and Bruce Hayes (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition 90: 119–161.

Andersen, Henning (1973). Abductive and deductive change. Language 49(4): 765–93.

Andersen, Henning (1978). Perceptual and conceptual factors in abductive innovations. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Recent developments in historical phonology, 1–

22. The Hague: Mouton.

Anderson, Stephen R (1969). West Scandinavian Vowel Systems and the Ordering of Phonological Rules. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.

Bates Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker and Steve Walker (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1–48.

Benua, Laura (1997). Transderivational identity: Phonological relations between words. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

Berendsen, Egon and Els den Os (1987). Glide insertion: domains, speech rate and phonetic prominence. In Frits Beukema and Peter Coopmans (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1987, 13–20. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.

Berg, René van den (1989). A grammar of the Muna language. Dordrecht: Foris.

Bethin, Christina Y. (1992). Iotation and gemination in Ukrainian. The Slavic and East European Journal 36: 275–301.

Bethin, Christina Y. (1998). Slavic prosody: language change and phonological theory.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Blevins, Juliette (1995). The Syllable in Phonological Theory. In John Goldsmith (ed.), Handbook of phonological theory 1, 206–244. London: Blackwell.

Blevins, Juliette (2004). Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Blevins, Juliette. (2008). Consonant epenthesis: natural and unnatural histories. In Jeff Good (ed.), Language universals and language change, 79–107. Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

Blevins, Juliette and Andrew Garrett (1998). The origins of consonant-vowel metathesis. Language 74, 508–556.

178

Blevins, Juliette and Andrew Garrett (2004). The evolution of metathesis. In Bruce Hayes, Robert Kirchner, Donca Steriade (eds.), Phonetically Based Phonology, 117-156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bloch, Bernard (1948). A set of postulates for phonemic analysis. Language 24: 3–46.

Blust, Robert (1998). A Lou vocabulary, with phonological notes. Pacific Linguistics A-92: 35–99.

Boersma, Paul (2007). Some listener-oriented accounts of h-aspiré in French. Lingua 117(12): 1989-2054.

Booij, Geert (1999). The phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Booij, Geert (2008). Lexical storage and phonological change. In Christin Hanson and Sharon Inkelas (eds.), The Nature of the Word. Essays in Honor of Paul Kiparsky, 497-505. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Booij, Geert (2020). Principles of word formation. In Richard B. Page and Michael T.

Putnam (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics, 238‒258.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Booij, Geert and Jerzy Rubach (1987). Postcyclic versus Postlexical Rules in Lexical Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 1–44.

Bosch, Anna R. K (2011). Syllable-internal structure. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elisabeth Hume and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology 781–798. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell

Breen, Gavan and Rob Pensalfini (1999). Arrernte: A language with no syllable onsets.

Linguistic Inquiry 30: 1–25.

Breza, Edward and Jerzy Treder (1981). Gramatyka kaszubska: Zarys popularny.

Gdańsk: Zrzeszenie Kaszubsko-Pomorskie.

Bright, William (1957). The Karok language. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Brunner Jana and Marzena Żygis (2011). Why do glottal stops and low vowels like each other? In Wai-Sum Lee and Eric Zee (eds.). Proceedings of the XVIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 376–379. Hong Kong.

Bybee, Joan (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cabré, Teresa and Pilar Prieto (2004). Prosodic and analogical effects in lexical glide formation in Catalan. Probus 16: 113–150. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Cairns, Charles and Mark Feinstein (1982). Markedness and the theory of syllable structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 193–225.

179

Casali, Roderic F (1996). Resolving hiatus. Doctoral dissertation. Los Angeles:

University of California.

Casali, Roderic F (1997). Vowel Elision in Hiatus Contexts: Which Vowel Goes?

Language 73(3): 493–533. Linguistic Society of America.

Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York:

Harper & Row.

Clements, George N (1986). Compensatory lengthening and consonant gemination in LuGanda. In Leo Wetzels and Engin Sezer (eds.), Studies in Compensatory Lengthening, 37–77. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Clements, George N (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In:

John Kingston and Mary Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I:

Between the grammar and physics of speech, 283–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clements, George and Samuel Keyser J (1983). CV phonology. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.

Czaplicki, Bartłomiej (2007). Syllable Structure of Ukrainian. An OT Perspective.

Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 43(2): 23–41.

Czaplicki, Bartłomiej (2009). Non-teleological approaches to metathesis: Evidence from dialects of Polish. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45(3): 353–

367.

Czaplicki, Bartłomiej (2010a). Palatalized labials in dialectal Polish: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Slavic linguistics 18: 259–290.

Czaplicki, Bartłomiej (2010b). Emergent Stops in English and in Polish: Against Syllable-Based Accounts. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46(2): 177–

191.

Czaplicki, Bartłomiej (2013). R-metathesis in English: An account based on perception and frequency of use. Lingua 137: 172–192.

Czaplicki, Bartłomiej (2014). Frequency of use and expressive palatalization: Polish diminutives. In Eugeniusz Cyran and Jolanta Szpyra-Kozłowska (eds.), Crossing Phonetics-Phonology Lines, 141–160. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Czaplicki, Bartłomiej (2020). A Listener-Oriented Account of the Evolution of Diphthongs and Changes in the Jers in Kashubian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 28(2): 104–140.

180

Czaplicki, Bartłomiej (2021). The strength of morphophonological schemas:

Consonant mutations in Polish. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1): 25.

1–34.

Davidson, Lisa and David Erker (2014). Hiatus resolution in American English: The case against glide insertion. Language 90(2): 482–514.

De Bray, Reginald George A (1980). Guide to the west Slavonic languages. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica Publishers.

Dejna, Karol (1973). Dialekty polskie. Warsaw: Zakład Narodowy Imienia Ossolińskich.

De Lacy, Paul (2006). Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Dilley, Laura C, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel R, and Mari Ostendorf (1996).

Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics 24: 423–444.

Dunaj, Bogusław (2006). Zasady poprawnej wymowy polskiej. Język Polski LXXXVI:

161–172.

Dukiewicz, Leokadia (1995). Fonetyka. In Henryk Wróbel (ed.), Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Fonetyka i fonologia, 7–95. Cracow: Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN.

Dupoux, Emmanuel, Kazuhiko Kakehi, Yuki Hirose, Christophe Pallier and Jacques Mehler (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25: 1568–1578.

Ellis, Nick C (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143–188.

Elimelech, Baruch (1976). A tonal grammar of Etsako. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 35.

Elbert, Samuel H (1988). Echo of a culture: A grammar of Rennell and Bellona. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 22. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Féry, Caroline (1995). Alignment, syllable and metrical Structure in German. Doctoral dissertation. University of Tübingen.

Firth, John R (1948). Sounds and prosodies. Transactions of the Philological Society:

127–152.

Flemming, Edward (1995). Auditory representations in phonology. Doctoral dissertation. Los Angeles: University of California.

181

Frisch, Stefan (1996). Similarity and frequency in phonology. Doctoral dissertation.

Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.

Fujimura, Osamu, Marian Macchi and Lynn Streeter (1978). Perception of stop consonants with conflicting transitional cues: A cross-linguistic study. Language and Speech 21: 337–346.

Gąsienica-Szostak, Aldona (2016). Stymulowanie rozwoju mowy dzieci. Kompendium dla rodziców. Opracowanie sporządzone na podstawie wydawnictw medycznych, pedagogicznych i artykułów opublikowanych w Internecie. Piaseczno: Poradnia Psychologiczno-Pedagogiczna.

Gick, Bryan (1999). A gesture-based account of intrusive consonants in English.

Phonology 16: 29–54.

Giegerich, Heinz (1992). English Phonology: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goldsmith, John A (1976). Autosegmental phonology. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.

Gołąbek, Eugeniusz (2012). Słownik polsko-kaszubski. Gdańsk: Zrzeszenie Kaszubsko-Pomorskie.

Gordon, Matthew (1999). Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology and typology.

Doctoral dissertation. Los Angeles: University of California.

Greenberg, Joseph H (1978). Diachrony, synchrony, and language universals. In Joseph Greenberg H, Charles Ferguson A, and Edith Moravcsik A (eds.), Universals of human language, 61–91. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Gries, Stefan Th (2013). Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction. 2nd revised edition. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Gussenhoven, Carlos (1980). Review of Mieke Trommelen and Wim Zonneveld (1979) Inleiding in the generatieve fonologie. Gramma 4: 174–183.

Gussmann, Edmund (2007). The phonology of Polish. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Hall, Tracy A (1992). Syllable Structure and Syllable-Related Processes in German.

Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Hall, Nancy (2011). Vowel epenthesis. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen J, Elisabeth Hume and Keren Rice (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 1576–1596. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Halle, Morris (1959). The sound pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton & Co.

Halle, Morris (1992). Phonological features. In William Blight (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 207–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

182

Halle, Morris (1995). Feature Geometry and feature spreading. Linguistic Inquiry 26:

1–46.

Hamann, Silke (2003). German glide formation functionally viewed. ZAS Working Papers in Linguistics 32: 137–154.

Harris, John (2011). Deletion. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elisabeth Hume and Keren Rice (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 1597–1621.

Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Hayes, Bruce (1986). Assimilation as spreading in Toba Batak. Linguistic Inquiry 17:

467–499.

Hayes, Bruce (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 253–306.

Hockett, Charles F (1955). A manual of phonology. Memoir of International Journal of American Linguistics 11. Baltimore: Waverly Press.

Hualde, Jose I (1992). Catalan. London: Routledge.

Hume, Elisabeth (2004). The Indeterminacy/Attestation Model of Metathesis.

Language 80(2): 203–237.

Hume, Elisabeth (2011). Markedness. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume and Keren Rice (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 79–106. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Hume, Elisabeth and Keith Johnson (2001). A model of the interplay of speech perception and phonology. In Elisabeth Hume and Keith Johnson (eds.), The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology, 3–26. New York: Academic Press.

Hyman, Larry M (2014). How autosegmental is phonology? The Linguistic Review 31(2): 363–400.

Itô, Junko and Armin Mester (1995). Japanese phonology. In John A. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 817–838. Cambridge, MA & Oxford:

Blackwell.

Jakobson, Roman, Gunar M Fant and Morris Halle (1952). Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.

Jakobson, Roman (1929). Remarqes sur l’évolution phonologique du russe comparée à celle des autres langues slaves. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 2 [Reprinted (1962) in Selected Writings.Vol. I: Phonological studies. The Hague:

Mouton. 7-116.]

183

Jakobson, Roman and Linda R. Waugh (1987). The sound shape of language. Berlin:

Mouton de Gruyter.

Jacobsen, William H (1964). A grammar of the Washo language. Doctoral dissertation.

University of California Berkeley.

Jespersen, Otto (1904). Phonetische Grundfragen. Leipzig and Berlin: Teubner.

Jespersen, Otto (1913). Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig/Berlin: Teubner.

Jongenburger, Willy and Vincent van Heuven (1991). The distribution of (word initial) glottal stop in Dutch. In Frank Drijkoningen and Ans van Kemenade, (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1991, 101–110. Dordrecht: Foris.

Jun, Jongho (1995). Place assimilation as the result of conflicting perceptual and articulatory constraints. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 14: 221–237.

Jun, Jongho (2004). Place assimilation. In Bruce Hayes, Robert Kirchner and Donca Steriade (eds.), Phonetically based phonology, 58–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kahn, Daniel (1976). Syllable-Based Generalizations in English Phonology. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.

Kager, René (2004). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Karaś, Mieczysław and Maria Madejowa (1977). Słownik wymowy polskiej. Warsaw:

Wydawnictwo naukowe PWN.

Karpowicz, Tomasz (2009). Kultura języka polskiego. Wymowa, ortografia, interpunkcja.

Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Katamba, Francis (1985). A non-linear account of the syllable in Luganda. In Didier L.

Goyvaerts (ed.), African linguistics: Essays in memory of M. W. K. Semikenke, 267–

283. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kąś, Józef (2015). Ilustrowany leksykon gwary i kultury podhalańskiej. T. 1. Bukowina Tatrzańska: Bukowińskie Centrum Kultury "Dom Ludowy".

Kenstowicz, Michael (1994). Syllabification in Chukchee: A constraint-based analysis.

Proceedings of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America: 160–181.

Department of Linguistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychlý, Pavel Smrž and David Tugwell (2004). Itri-04-08 the sketch engine. Information Technology.

Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý and Vít Suchomel (2014). The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography 1: 7–36.

184

Kingston, John (2019). The interface between phonetics and phonology. In William F Katz and Peter F Assmann (eds.), The Routledge handbook of phonetics, 359–400.

London and NewYork: Routledge.

Kiparsky, Paul (1982). From Cyclic to Lexical Phonology. In Harry van der Hulst, and Norval Smith (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations. Part 1, 131–

175. Dordrecht: Foris.

Kiparsky, Paul (1998). Siever’s Law as Prosodic Optimization. In Jay Jasanoff, H, Craig Melchert, and Lisi Olivier (eds.), Mir Curad: Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins, 1–14. Innsbruck: Insbrücker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.

Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona and Marzena Żygis (2012). Phonetic and lexical gradience in Polish prefixed words. Cognitive Linguistics 23: 317–366. De Gruyter Mouton.

Kutsch Lojenga, Constance (1994). Ngiti: A Central-Sudanic language of Zaire. Cologne:

Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.

Ladefoged, Peter (2001). A Course in Phonetics. Fort Worth: Hartcourt College Publishers.

Lass, Roger (1996). Glottal stop and linking [h] in South African English: with a note on two antique connections. In Juhani Klemola, Meria Kyo and Matti Rissanen, Speech Past and Present: Studies in English Dialectology in Memory of Ossi Ihalainen, 131–141.

Levelt, Clara C., Niels O. Schiller and Willem J. Levelt (2000). The acquisition of syllable types. Language Acquisition 8: 237–264.

Levi, Susannah (2004). The representation of underlying glides: A cross-linguistic study. Doctoral dissertation. University of Washington.

Levi, Susannah (2011). Glides. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume and Keren Rice (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 341–366.

Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Lombardi, Linda (1995). Why place and voice are different: constraint-specific alternations and Optimality Theory. Rutgers Optimality Archive 105.

Lombardi, Linda (1997). Coronal epenthesis and markedness. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 156-175.

Lynch, John (2000). A grammar of Anejom. Pacific Linguistics 507. Canberra: The Australian National University.

Manova, Stela (ed.) (2015). Affix ordering across languages and frameworks. New York:

Oxford University Press

185

Mańczak, Witold (1980). Laws of analogy. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology, 283–288. The Hague: Mouton.

Malisz Zofia, Marzena Żygis, and Bernd Pompino-Marschall (2013). Rhythmic structure effects on glottalisation: A study of different speech styles in Polish and German. In Martine Grice and Doris Mücke (eds.), Temporal Structure and Mechanisms of Timing. Special Issue of Laboratory Phonology 4, 119–158.

Martin, Andrew and Sharon Peperkamp (2011). Speech perception and phonology. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 2334–2356. Malden, MA & Oxford:

Wiley-Blackwell.

Mascaró, Joan (1976). Catalan Phonology and the Phonological Cycle. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.

McMahon, April (2001). An Introduction to English Phonology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

McCarthy, John J (1993). A case of surface constraint violation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38. 169–95.

McCarthy, John J and Alan Prince (1993). Generalized alignment. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1993: 79–153. Dordrecht:

Kluwer.

McCarthy, Paul and Alan Prince (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey and Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, 249–384. Amherst: GLSA.

Michałowska, Danuta (1994). O podstawach polskiej wymowy scenicznej. Cracow:

PWST.

Osowicka-Kondratowicz, Magdalena (2018). Zwarcie krtaniowe – rodzaj fonacji czy artykulacji? Rocznik Slawistyczny 67: 39–53.

Ohala, John J (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In Carrie S Masek, Roberta A Hendrick and Mary F Miller (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, 178–203. Chicago: CLS.

Ohala, John J (1997). Emergent stops: diachronic and phonetic data. Proceedings of Seoul international conference on linguistics: 84–91. Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea.

Payne, David L (1981). The phonology and morphology of Axininca Campa. Austin, TX:

Summer Institute of Linguistics.