Indywidualizacja jako proces społeczno-kulturowy a moralność

(1)

- -

--

-1

1_{U. Beck,}

(2)

2

3

4

2_{S. Lash,} _{, [w:] U. Beck, A.}

Gid-dens, S. Lash, Modernizacja refleksyjna. Polityka, tradycj

157.

3_{P. Sztompka,}

(3)

5

-6 7

5_{Z. Bauman,} o-Lublin 2013, s. 49 62. 6_{P. Sztompka,} 7 _{E. Wnuk-} _{, Warszawa 2008, s. 346.}

(4)

-8

8 o wski, y-, Warszawa 2020y-, s. 170.

(5)

9_{F.-X. Kaufmann,} _{, [w:] Kirche Idee und}

, Hrsg. von R. Heinzmann, Freiburg im Breisgau 2014, s. 251 269.

(6)

10

-11

10_{P.L. Berger, T. Luckmann,} s. 260. 11 _{Z. Bauman,} _25.

(7)

-13 14 15

12 o-wych -s. 139 151.

13_{G. Schulze, Die Erlebnisgesellschaft. Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart, Frankfurt New York}

1992, s. 55.

14_{K. Koch, Ze}

i

-1998, nr 4, s. 18 , [w:] Wiara i rozum.

Re-ed. G. Witaszek, Lublin 1999, s. 77 112.

15_{A. Giddens,} _,

(8)

(9)

-16

-17

16 _Socjol _{, [w:]} e-go) 60.

17 _{antagonizm czy}

kom-[w:] ad aksjonormatywny w okresie kryzysu, red. D.

(10)

18

19

20

18

dzygeneracyjna, [w:] , red. D. Walczak-Duraj, J.

Ma-, Lublin 2013Ma-, s. 253 319.

19 _11.

20 _Postmoderni _{, [w:] Postmodernizm. Wyzwanie dla}

(11)

21 22

21 _{, [w:]} y-zje ublin 2009, s. 347 362. 22_{J. Ratzinger,}

(12)

23_{A. Kojder,} _{, [w:]} _- Polska X s. 256.

(13)

24

25

24 _{Uwarunkowania nowej ewangelizacji w demokratycznej Polsce, [w:] Oddanie}

i

Warszawa 2004, s. 107 166.

25_{K. Gabriel,} _{, [w:] Handbuch Religionssoziologie, Hrsg. von D. Pollack,}

(14)

26

27

-rodzinnej. Zasady sku

i prag

y-

e--

26 _67. 27 i przemi

(15)

29 30 31

28 _, Warszawa 2019, s. 125 164. 29_{J. Majka,} _obyczajowej 30 o-

e-ji rozmawia Adam Chmielewski,

-evaluation, [w:] Between Construction and Deconstruction of the Universes of Meaning. Re-search into the Religiosity of Academic Youth in the Years 1988 1998 2005 2017, red. S.H.

70.

(16)

33

32 _{Rozmowa z profesorem Zygmuntem Baumanem}

(17)

(18)

-35

34 [w:] s. 167 191.

35_{G. Pickel, Religion und Wertorientierungen, [w:] Handbuch Religionssoziologie, Hrsg. von}

(19)

37 38

36 twierdzi socjolog Piotr Sztompka. o 37 _, To-312. 38 nr 2, s. 57.

(20)

(21)

(22)

(23)

-In this article, the issue of structural individualisation, which is one of the results of social modernisation, is adopted as the subject-matter. In the processes of individualisation, it is, first and foremost, the importance of an individual human being and matters relevant to their life, in-cluding the obligation to make constant choices in all the aspects of life, that is placed emphasis upon. In the aspect of values, the process of individualisation means transfer from values seen as responsibilities (related to duties) to values connected with self-fulfilment (self-development). The consequence of individualisation is the significant changes in the realm of morality: departing from traditional moral values and standards, permissivism and moral relativism, the destruction of normativity, and the secularisation of morality. On the other hand, it creates the opportunity to de-termine one's own moral choices and shapean autonomous moral personality.

Keywords: individualisation, morality, permissivism, moral relativism, the secularisation of morality.