• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

View of Marketing and Processing Share in Food Prices (Long Term Comparative Analysis)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "View of Marketing and Processing Share in Food Prices (Long Term Comparative Analysis)"

Copied!
7
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Rocz. AR Pozn. CCCLIX, Ekon. 3: 137-143

© Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej im. Augusta Cieszkowskiego w Poznaniu, Poznań 2004 PL ISSN 1731-0261

WALENTY POCZTA, EWA KIRYLUK

MARKETING AND PROCESSING SHARE IN FOOD PRICES

(LONG TERM COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS)

From Department of Food Management Economics of The August Cieszkowski Agricultural University of Poznań

ABSTRACT. This paper analyzes the final agricultural output value, the foodstuffs consumption value, and the price relations of primary agricultural products and food in Poland and Germany in 1960-2001. The share of the final agricultural output value in the foodstuffs consumption value has decreased in both countries. Although it is lower in Germany, the rate of its decrease is greater in Poland. In Poland and Germany the differences in prices between primary agricultural products and food have been increasing. At the same time the margin of profit for processing and trade has been growing in both countries.

Key words: final agricultural output value, foodstuffs consumption value, price rela-tions, margin of profit

Introduction

Prices, as the main factor influencing production and consumption, constitute the co-re of economics. Agricultural prices play a special role, since they determine the agri-cultural production income, consumers’ level of life and, in many countries, the value of export (Tomek and Robinson 2001).

The money farmers receive for the products they sell is just a fraction of the money spent by final consumers. Consumer expenditures for foodstuff are divided between original producers/farmers and between processing and distribution agencies. The food prices to agricultural prices index may be a base to estimate the share of final agricultu-ral production value in foodstuffs consumption value, and to assess at the same time the marketing and processing margin. The gap between the agricultural production value and the foodstuffs consumption value has recently been expanding in most of the deve-loped countries.

(2)

The aim of this publication is to assess and compare the processing and marketing share in food prices in Poland and Germany, on the basis of food consumption value, agricultural production value and price trends analysis in 1960-2002.

Germany and Poland have similar production and consumption structures thus have been chosen for comparison analysis. The data used in this paper comes from Polish and German statistical publications.

The share of agricultural production value in foodstuffs consumption

value

Most of agricultural products undergo considerable processing before being placed in the form desired by the consumer. The costs of marketing and processing of agricul-tural products are defined as a margin. A margin can be also defined as a difference between food prices and agricultural products prices (Tomek and Robinson 2001).

Figure 1 presents the final agricultural output value and foodstuffs consumption va-lue in Poland in 1960-2002. Within the analyzed period in Poland, the difference betwe-en the value of the final agricultural output and foodstuffs consumption was persistbetwe-ently trending up. The value of the final agricultural output has been increasing on average by 331 M. zl per year, while foodstuffs consumption value has been growing by 1.4 mil-liards zl per year. The annual growth of the foodstuffs consumption value has been four times bigger than the final annual agricultural output value growth.

Fig. 1. Final agricultural output value and foodstuffs consumption value in Poland in 1960-2002 (constant prices of 2001) (on the basis of Roczniki... 1961-2003) Ryc. 1. Wartość końcowej produkcji rolniczej oraz wartość spożycia żywności w Polsce

w latach 1960-2002 (ceny stałe z 2001 roku) (na podstawie Roczników... 1961-2003) y = 1.4448x + 35.138 R2 = 0.9373 y = 0.3313x + 27.28 R2 = 0.6474 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 196 0 196 2 196 4 196 6 196 8 197 0 197 2 197 4 197 6 197 8 198 0 198 2 198 4 198 6 198 8 199 0 199 2 199 4 199 6 199 8 200 0 200 2 years – lata

foodstuffs consumption value – wartość spożycia żywności final agricultural output value – wartość końcowej produkcji rolniczej

millards zl mld zł

(3)

Figure 2 presents the final agricultural output value and foodstuffs consumption va-lue in Germany in 1968-2001. The difference between the vava-lue of the final agricultural output and foodstuffs consumption in Germany has been more pronounced than in Po-land throughout the entire analyzed period. The annual growth of the final agricultural output value has been 290 M. EUR, while foodstuffs consumption value has been incre-asing by 2.4 milliards per year.

Fig. 2. Final agricultural output value and foodstuffs consumption value in Germany in 1968-2001 (constant prices of 2001) (on the basis of Statistisches... 1968-2001)

Ryc. 2. Wartość końcowej produkcji rolniczej oraz wartość spożycia żywności w Niemczech w latach 1968-2001 (ceny stałe z 2001 roku)

(na podstawie Statistisches... 1968-2001)

Figure 3 presents the proportion of final agricultural output value in foodstuffs con-sumption value in Poland and Germany between 1960 and 2002. The share of final agricultural output value in foodstuffs consumption value has been decreasing in both countries. In Poland in 1961 it amounted to over 69%, while in 2000 it fell to 37.8%. A sharp decrease of the index was noticed in the years 1990-1991, when it fell from 56.8% to 47.7%. In Germany the share of the final agricultural output value in the foodstuffs consumption value decreased from 26.3% to 19%, in years 1968-2001.

It should be emphasized that in 2001 the share of final agricultural output value in foodstuffs consumption value in Poland was twice as big as in Germany. Larger mar-gins in Germany than in Poland may indicate that the processing and marketing sector is better developed in this country. The costs of marketing and processing are more impor-tant in Germany than in Poland, since they absorb bigger part of consumer food expen-ditures. y = 2.4396x + 87.325 R2 = 0.9504 y = 0.2892x + 24.242 R2 = 0.9088 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 years – lata milliards EUR mld EUR

foodstuffs consumption value – wartość spożycia żywności final agricultural output value – wartość końcowej produkcji rolniczej

(4)

Fig. 3. Final agricultural output value share in foodstuffs consumption value in Poland and Germany in 1960-2002 (constant prices of 2001) (on the basis of Roczniki... 1961-2003,

Statistisches... 1960-2001)

Ryc. 3. Udział wartości końcowej produkcji rolniczej w wartości spożycia żywności w Polsce i w Niemczech w latach 1960-2002 (ceny stałe z 2001 roku)

(na podstawie Roczników... 1961-2003, Statistisches... 1960-2001)

However, the rate of decrease of agricultural production value share in foodstuffs consumption value has been more important in Poland than in Germany. In Poland this share has been decreasing annually by 0.6%, while in Germany only by 0.2%.

In Poland, the food market and consumer trends have been changing from the very beginning of the economic system transformation. Permanent supply failures from the former system have been changed into expanding food industry offer. Better possibili-ties of choice, growing consumer consciousness, changes in life style, and different consumer trends coming from the West resulted in increasing demand for highly pro-cessed and easy to handle food. As a result of growing consumers’ demands, further dynamic expansion of food marketing chain can be expected in coming years in Poland. This process may result in further decrease of agricultural production value share in foodstuffs consumption value.

Foodstuff to agricultural products price relations

The increasing marketing and processing margins may also be demonstrated by the food products to agricultural products price relations.

Table 1 presents food prices to agricultural prices index in Poland and Germany in 1960-2001. The differences in price relations’ indexes between products are mainly a result of differences in the level of their processing.

y = –0.6343x + 67.862 R2 = 0.8049 y = –0.1961x + 27.928 R2 = 0.7818 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 years – lata % Poland Polska Germany Niemcy

(5)

Table 1 Food prices to agricultural prices indexes in Poland and Germany in 1960-2001 (on the basis of Poczta and Wysocki 2000, Roczniki... 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991, 2001,

2002, Statistisches... 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2001) Relacje cen produktów spożywczych do cen produktów rolnych Polsce

i w Niemczech w latach 1960-2001 (na podstawie Poczty i Wysockiego 2000, Roczników... 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991, 2001, 2002, Statistisches... 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2001) Relation Relacja Country Kraj 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2001 Bread/cereal

Chleb/zboże Poland – Polska Germany – Niemcy 2.7– 1.43.9 1.65.9 3.59.8 18.3 5.1 5.2 – Flour/cereal

Mąka/zboże Poland – Polska Germany – Niemcy 2.62.6 2.12.7 1.32.9 4.23.6 3.5 5.6 2.9 – Sugar/sugar beet

Cukier/buraki cukrowe Poland – Polska Germany – Niemcy 20.015.9 17.517.7 14.3 7.4 25.019.0 26.7 21.7 24.6 – Milk in retail/milk in wholesale Mleko detaliczne/mleko w skupie Poland – Polska Germany – Niemcy 1.2 0.9 1.2 1.9 0.4 2.0 1.5 2.0 1.6 2.2 1.7 – Butter/milk Masło/mleko Poland – Polska Germany – Niemcy 27.4 21.1 24.1 19.0 10.4 16.1 40 13.3 17.4 13.8 15.5 – Cheese (Gouda)/milk Ser (Gouda)/mleko Poland – Polska Germany – Niemcy 17.7 13.6 18.9 17.0 7.6 19.0 35.5 19.8 20.6 20.2 19.6 – Joint of pork/pork Schab wieprzowy/żywiec wieprzowy Poland – Polska Germany – Niemcy 2.6 3.3 3.1 3.4 1.8 4.1 4.0 5.3 3.8 5.9 3.3 – Beef meat/beef Mięso wołowe/żywiec wołowy Poland – Polska Germany – Niemcy 3.55.1 4.54.2 2.14.7 5.97.3 5.2 9.4 5.1 – Poultry meat/poultry Mięso drobiowe/żywiec drobiowy Poland – Polska Germany – Niemcy 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 1.5 2.5 2.3 2.6 1.8 3.0 1.5 – Eggs in wholesale/eggs in retail Jajka w skupie/jajka w detalu Poland – Polska Germany – Niemcy 1.61.2 1.61.3 1.51.4 2.51.8 1.7 1.9 1.8 – Ham/pork Szynka gotowana/żywiec wieprzowy Poland – Polska Germany – Niemcy – 4.9 5.35.7 3.77.5 10.8 6.8 12.5 5.4 4.7 – Myśliwska sausage/pork Kiełbasa myśliwska/ży-wiec wieprzowy Poland – Polska Germany – Niemcy 2.43.1 5.93.5 4.24.8 6.27.3 6.1 8.6 5.4 – Potatoes in wholesale/po-tatoes in retail Ziemniaki w skupie/ /ziemniaki w detalu Poland – Polska Germany – Niemcy 2.2 4.8 2.3 2.3 1.4 3.5 2.5 6.3 2.4 8.2 3.0 –

(6)

Between 1960 and 1970, the price relation of bread, flour, eggs, potatoes to their commodities were on relatively low and at constant level in Poland. “Cheap food poli-cy” held by the government based on subsidizing every stage of agri-food chain allowed to keep relatively low food prices. The lowest prices of food in relation to agricultural products were noticed in 1980 when the biggest part of production was subsidized. Sharp increase of food prices in Poland was observed in 1990. With the change of eco-nomic system, prices of agricultural products and food, as well as all restrictions con-cerning margins were liberalized. The most important increase in the prices characteri-zed the products the most restricted before, e.g. sugar, butter and meat and its prepara-tions (Kowrygo 2000). Price relation of butter to milk in 1990 amounted to 40, and sugar to sugar-beet 25. Important growth of price relation index has been also observed for cheese. It increased from 7.6 in 1980 to 35.5 in 1990. Since 1990 bread and milk have become relatively more expensive.

In Germany the values of foodstuff to agricultural products price relations indexes have been, in most cases, bigger than in Poland. For all products presented in Table 1 these indexes have been constantly growing. The biggest discrepancies between Poland and Germany apply to bread/cereal, flour/cereal, processed meat/meat and potatoes in wholesale/potatoes in retail. The closest relations between Poland and Germany apply to cheese/milk, milk in wholesale/milk in retail and eggs in wholesale/eggs in retail. Che-ese as a highly processed product is characterized by high margins in both countries (value of index of about 20). According to food market studies (Górska-Warsewicz 2002) milk has been the only product on the Polish food market listed in Table 1 asso-ciated with a brand, which strongly influences its price. Eggs as unprocessed products, are characterized by relatively constant and similar level of price relation index in Po-land and Germany. In PoPo-land, butter and sugar prices in relation to their commodities prices have been higher.

Polish and German household expenditure structures are different (Michota-Katul-ska and Kopytek 2002). However, because of tendency of absorbing consumer patterns and consumption trends from more developed countries, the increase of prices of bread, meat, butcher’s meat and potatoes can be expected in Poland.

Conclusions

1. Falling share of agricultural production value in foodstuff consumption value is a result of more developed marketing chain of food, growing level of food processing and increasing demands of consumers.

2. The differences in prices of agricultural products and food have been expanding in Poland and Germany. At the same time marketing and processing margins have been increasing, while farmers’ share in foodstuff consumption value has been falling.

3. Similar consumption trends in Poland and Germany may cause the growth of bread, meat, processed meat and potatoes retail prices in Poland.

(7)

Literature

Górska-Warsewicz H. (2002): Preferencje względem marek produktów jako jeden z elementów zachowań konsumenckich. In: Konsument żywności i jego zachowania rynkowe. Ogólnopol-ska Konferencja Naukowa, Warszawa 12-13.10.2000. Eds K. GutkowOgólnopol-ska, I. Ozimek. Wyd. SGGW, Warszawa: 112-121.

Kowrygo B. (2000): Studium wpływu gospodarki rynkowej na sferę żywności i żywienia w Polsce. Wyd. SGGW, Warszawa.

Michota-Katulska E., Kopytek M. (2002): Poziom konsumpcji oraz struktura wydatków w polskich i niemieckich gospodarstwach domowych (analiza porównawcza). In: Konsument żywności i jego zachowania rynkowe. Ogólnopolska Konferencja Naukowa, Warszawa 12- -13.10.2000. Eds K. Gutkowska, I. Ozimek. SGGW, Warszawa: 134-140.

Poczta W., Wysocki F. (2000):Ceny i relacje cenowe jako miara zrównoważonego rozwoju ekonomicznego rolnictwa. Rocz. Nauk. SERiA 2, 4: 253-262.

Roczniki statystyczne 1960-2002. (1961-2003). GUS, Warszawa.

Statisisches Jahrbuch über Ernährung Landwirtschaft und Forsten. (1960-2001). Bundesministe-rium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, Bonn.

Tomek W., Robinson K. (2001): Kreowanie cen artykułów rolnych. Wyd. Nauk. PWN, War-szawa.

UDZIAŁ PRZETWÓRSTWA I MARKETINGU W CENIE ŻYWNOŚCI (ANALIZA PORÓWNAWCZA W DŁUGIM OKRESIE)

S t r e s z c z e n i e

Celem artykułu jest określenie udziału przetwórstwa i obrotu w cenie produktu finalnego na podstawie prezentacji trendów zmian wartości spożycia żywności, wartości produkcji rolniczej oraz relacji cenowych artykułów spożywczych do cen surowców w Polsce i w Niemczech. Róż-nica pomiędzy wartością końcowej produkcji rolniczej oraz wartością spożycia żywności wzrasta w obu krajach. W Niemczech udział wartości końcowej produkcji rolniczej w wartości spożycia żywności jest mniejszy niż w Polsce, jednak w Polsce udział ten spada szybciej. W Niemczech w całym badanym okresie oraz w Polsce od 1990 roku w przypadku większości analizowanych produktów zauważa się wzrastające różnice pomiędzy cenami produktów spożywczych a cenami surowców rolniczych. Malejący udział wartości produkcji rolniczej w wartości spożycia żywności oraz wzrastające różnice cen produktów spożywczych i ich surowców są wynikiem coraz bardziej rozwiniętej sieci marketingowej produktów spożywczych.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Cross-correlation coefficients between cyclicality of food sector markups and both the macro and the secto- rial business cycles as well as with consumer price inflation (CPI)

As research conducted in Poland and other post-communist bloc countries has shown, significant changes in food consumption have occurred as a result of the integration of

Być m oże w ydaw ca nie uniknął pewnych (drobnych zresztą) usterek. W stęp jest zbyt lakoniczny.. antreprener, flizy, asocjacja, tantiema, induit).. Instituta Russkaj

Warstwa nadawy o mniejszej jamistoœci (warstwa materia³u zawiera drobny materia³ z zawrotu i charakteryzuje siê wiêkszym zró¿nicowaniem uziarnienia) szybciej osi¹ga stabilizacjê,

For the analysis of the flux propagation and the distribution of magnetic induction for selected states of the wear and tear of the sleeve the QuickField program was

Z punktu widzenia jakoœci badanego kruszywa okreœlonej normami PN-EN 12620: 2008 i PN-EN 13043: 2004 nale¿y stwierdziæ, ¿e dla odmian afanitowej, afanitowo-porfirowej

Probability distribution parameters of roadway’s rate of advance, as well as of costs connected by area with their exploitation, collected in suitable data base, together with the

 obserwację wpływu czasu działania ustalonego wymuszenia termicznego na proces termooksydacji paliwa lotniczego (stała objętość badanej próbki, zmienny czas