• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Influence of concentration of magnetic nanoparticles on the blocking temperature in 0.05Fe2O3/0.95ZnO and 0.10Fe2O3/0.90ZnO

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Influence of concentration of magnetic nanoparticles on the blocking temperature in 0.05Fe2O3/0.95ZnO and 0.10Fe2O3/0.90ZnO"

Copied!
1
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Samples of 0.05Fe O /0.95ZnO and 0.10Fe O /0.90ZnO have been prepared and investigated by using ferromagnetic 2 3 2 3 resonance (FMR) method. Samples were characterized by XRD method.

Figures 1 and 2 present the FMR spectra taken at different temperatures for both samples. The temperature dependence of parameters describing the FMR spectrum for both samples is shown in Figs. 3-5.

Influence of concentration of magnetic

nanoparticles on the blocking

temperature in 0.05Fe O /0.95ZnO and

2 3

0.10Fe O /0.90ZnO

2 3

1,2 1 2 2 3

N. Guskos , S. Glenis , G. Zolnierkiewicz , J. Typek , D. Sibera

3

and U. Narkiewicz

1

Solid State Section, Department of Physics, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, 15 784, Greece

2

Institute of Physics, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Al. Piastow 48, 70-311 Szczecin, Poland

3

Institute of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology,

Al. Piastow 17, 70-310 Szczecin, Poland

Figure 1: FMR spectra of 0.05Fe O /0.95ZnO registered at different temperatures.2 3 Figure 2: FMR spectra of 0.10Fe O /0.90ZnO registered at different temperatures.2 3

Figure 3: Temperature dependence of FMR resonance fields of 0.05Fe O /0.95ZnO and 0.10Fe O /0.90ZnO 2 3 2 3

samples.

Strong temperature dependence is observed for three important parameters: apparent resonance field (H ), linewidth (H ) r pp and amplitude (A ). Essential differences between both samples are recorded in the low temperatures range that could be pp accounted for by differences in concentration of magnetic nanoparticles. Strong differences observed for the resonance amplitude signal (Fig. 5) in both samples are attributed to differences in the blocking temperature of the superparamagnetic state: T =150 K for sample with lower concentration, and T =170 K for sample with higher concentration of magnetic b b nanoparticles.

Figure 4: Temperature dependence of FMR linewidths of 0.05Fe O /0.95ZnO and 0.10Fe O /0.90ZnO samples.2 3 2 3

Figure 5: Temperature dependence of FMR signal amplitudes of 0.05Fe O /0.95ZnO and 0.10Fe O /0.90ZnO 2 3 2 3

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

The author does not know whether the statements of Theorems 2, 3 and Proposition 1 remain true in their previous

[r]

The second case is trivial, because then M is an open tube in C 2 and by Bochner’s tube theorem any holomorphic function on M can be holo- morphically extended to the convex hull of

Przy rysowaniu SKUF istotne jest dostrzeżenie podwójnego układu szeregów i kolumn, tymczasem znaczna część dzieci w wieku do 7 lat, a także pewna grupa

Faculty of Physics Selected Topics in Fluid Mechanics. Summer

Changes in petrophysical properties in the Muschelkalk deposits mainly depend on the type of reservoir rocks and the course of dislocation zones.The didtribution of porosity

–strain state analysis are shown: defl ections of the shell, axial and circular stresses, fol- lowed by the comparison of the results with and without consideration of thermal

The aggregated CE values for three-outcome lotteries are presented in Figure 3.4 as a function of the middle outcome x.. The two horizontal dotted lines mark the CE values for