Index of /rozprawy2/10947

Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus 92 National Scientific and Educational Centre for Particle and High Energy Physics, Minsk,

15 Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California, Berkeley CA, United States of America.. 16 Department of Physics, Humboldt University,

Figure 12 shows the measured differential cross section as a function of the rapidity separation of the jets ð1= Z=

!‘ þ ‘  Þd=djy jj j, for both the electron and muon

The NLO pQCD predictions calculated with NLOJET++ using the CT10 PDF set with corrections for non-perturbative effects and electroweak effects applied are compared to the

18 Average jet response for anti-k t jets with R = 0.6 calibrated with the EM+JES scheme measured relative to a central reference jet within |η| < 0.8 using the matrix method in

The dominant uncertainty for the particle- level cross-section is the large-R jet energy scale, in particular its components due to the topology uncertainty at low p T and

33 Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; (b) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui;

A weighted sum of LHD distributions ( “templates”) for the signal and for the background was fitted to the LHD distribution in data, and the resulting number of signal events