S U R V E Y OF LITERATURE 1952—1953 389 U g o E n r i c o P a o l i , U assentiment paternel au marriage du
fils dans le droit attique (Extrait de la Revue "Archives
d'Hi-stoire du Droit Oriental et Revue Internationale des Droits de l ' A n t i q u i t é " , tome I, 1952).
This s t u d y although it concerns the Attic law will interest also the papyrologists (cf. on the rights of the f a t h e r to grant his daughter the consent for her marriage in the Greco-Egyptian law m y Law I, 37 ff.).
В o a z Cohen, Concerning Divorce in Jewish and Roman Law
(Reprinted f r o m Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, vol. X X I , [1952]).
This study devoted to the Jewish and R o m a n law will also inte-rest the papyrologists all the more as it makes use of papyrological literature p. 10, 11, 32. The author points a u t t h a t in a Greek pa-pyrus dated 390 A.D. there is a reference to a woman having given her husband a repudium (μετά το δοθέν αύτω ριπουδίον) which agrees literally w i lii R. J o h a n a n's s t a t e m e n t in this m a t t e r .
G i u s e p p e I g n a z i o L u z z a t t o , A proposito di una "Datio
tutoris mulieribus" da parte del ,,Praefectus AegyptV (Scritti
in onore di V. Arangio-Ruiz I V , 377—385).
The author endeavours to explain why the tutor in the A r a n g i o R u i z Fontes I I I , 25, p. 68 (cf. m y Law, I, p. 131), n o t w i t h -standing t h a t he is appointed b y the prefect, is called tutor
legi-timus. According to the author's opinion this designation is caused
b y the fact, t h a t the datio in this case is based on the lex. F r o m this point of view the tutor datus ex lege Julia can be named tutor
legitimus. However the t e r m tutor legitimus is nothing else t h a n the
translation of the Greek t e r m νόμιμος επίτροπος which appears in Oxy. 485 (cf. on νόμιμος επίτροπος my Law, I, 121).
V i n c e n z o A r a n g i o - R u i z , II testamento di Antonio Silvano
e il senatoconsulto di Nerone (Estr. da Studi in onore di Emilio
Albertario) 1950.
The problem concerns the case of the last will of Silvanus and the
senatus consultum, promoted b y Nero, to guarantee the secrecy
of testaments. Upon the analysis of the whole material the author comes to the conclusion t h a t not only Antonius Silvanus b u t also other Roman provincials were accustomed to write their testaments
